17
Development of an Advanced Node High Selectivity Tungsten Slurry James Schlueter Blake Lew, Hongjun Zhou, and Tom Shi Air Products and Chemicals Electronics Division, Planarization Platform Tempe, AZ Tempe, AZ CMP Users Group Meeting Albany, NY 15-May-2013 5/10/2013 1

Development of an Advanced Node High Selectivity Tungsten ......Corrosion Inhibitor Selection Removal Rates Selectivity 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 Tungsten Removal

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Development of an Advanced NodeHigh Selectivity Tungsten Slurry

    James SchlueterBlake Lew, Hongjun Zhou, and Tom Shi

    Air Products and ChemicalsElectronics Division, Planarization Platform

    Tempe, AZTempe, AZ

    CMP Users Group Meeting

    Albany, NY

    15-May-2013

    5/10/20131

  • Agenda

    •Tungsten Background / Overview

    •Tungsten Polish Mechanism

    •Performance Targets

    •Key Slurry Component Selection

    •Polishing Performance Results

    •Summary

    5/10/20132

  • Tungsten CMP Overview

    •Tungsten History:- CMP replaced RIE for Tungsten plug overburden removal

    CMPTungsten

    •Other Applications Followed:- Local Interconnect Lines

    - High K Metal Gate (HKMG)

    5/10/20133

  • H2O2 Based Tungsten Slurry Mechanism

    • H2O2 (hydrogen peroxide) is used as an oxidant and has a standard redox potential of 1.68eV.

    H2O2 + HO* + OH-Solid

    StateCatalyst

    Solid State

    Catalyst

    4

    • Addition of a metal oxide solid state (heterogeneous) catalyst decomposes H2O2 into hydroxyl radicals and anions.

    • Hydroxyl radicals (*OH) have a much stronger oxidizing potential than H2O2.- 1.68 vs > 2.60eV

  • H2O2 Based Tungsten Slurry Mechanism

    • Hydroxyl radicals rapidly form a WO3 and WO42- mixture on the metallic W surface.

    • WO42- exists as H2WO4 at acidic pH.

    • H2WO4 and WO3 films are removed from the surface under applied mechanical force during polishing.

    5

    under applied mechanical force during polishing.

    WWO3/H2WO4/WO4

    2-

  • Tungsten Slurry MechanismeV-pH Equilibrium Diagram for Tungsten in Water

    5/9/20126

    Oxidation

    pH

  • Tungsten High Selectivity Slurry Performance Targets

    •High Removal Rate (>4000Å/min.)

    • Low WIW NU (< 3% 1s)

    •High or Tunable Selectivity (>100:1) *

    • Low Defectivity

    • Low Oxide Loss and Array Erosion *• Low Oxide Loss and Array Erosion *

    • Long Shelf Life (> 1 yr)

    • Low Cost of Ownership

    *High Selectivity is required to minimize overalldielectric loss and array erosion (topography)

    5/10/20137

  • Key Base Slurry Components

    Key Component Purpose Result

    Oxidizer (H2O2)Oxidize Metallic W into WO3

    and WO42- Create/Support W Removal Rate

    CatalystCreate Super Oxidizing Hydroxyl Radicals (*OH)

    Support/Increase W Removal Rate

    Abrasive Mechanical Removal of WO3 Increase W Removal Rate

    • Tungsten CMP mechanism has unique slurry formulation requirements- Unique catalytic oxidation process

    5/10/20138

    Corrosion Inhibitor Protect W MetalLow Static Etch Rate (SER)

    Eliminated/Minimized W Corrosion

    pH Adjustor Adjust pH of Formulation Modulation of Film Selectivity

  • Experimental Setup

    • AMAT Mirra 200mm Polisher (Titan head)

    • Dow IC1000 Pad

    • Diamond Disc Pad Conditioning

    • 3 psi Downforce• 3 psi Downforce

    • 120 rpm Platen Speed

    •Base Slurry: Medium-High Selectivity

    5/10/20139

  • Key Slurry ComponentspH Adjustor

    • Base Tungsten Formulation: Medium-High Tungsten : TEOS Selectivity• W Removal Rate: > 5000 Å/min.• TEOS Removal Rate: 250 Å/min.

    • W : TEOS Selectivity: ~20:1

    Removal Rates Selectivity

    300

    350

    5000

    6000

    TE

    OS

    Re

    mo

    va

    l Ra

    te (

    A/m

    in.)

    Tun

    gst

    en

    Re

    mo

    va

    l Ra

    te (

    A/m

    in.)

    Tungsten and TEOS Removal Rate by pHMirra, IC1000 Pad, 3psi

    200

    250

    Tun

    gst

    en

    : T

    EO

    S R

    R S

    ele

    ctiv

    ity

    Tungsten and TEOS Selectivity by pHMirra, IC1000 Pad, 3psi

    Control

    5/10/201310

    • Increasing pH decreased TEOS RR and increased W : TEOS Selectivity

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    TE

    OS

    Re

    mo

    va

    l Ra

    te (

    A/m

    in.)

    Tun

    gst

    en

    Re

    mo

    va

    l Ra

    te (

    A/m

    in.)

    Increasing pH

    W RR

    TEOS RR

    Control

    20 2229

    37 42

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    Tun

    gst

    en

    : T

    EO

    S R

    R S

    ele

    ctiv

    ity

    Increasing pH

  • Key Slurry ComponentsSolid State Catalyst Selection

    Removal Rates Selectivity

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    Tun

    gst

    en

    Re

    mo

    va

    l R

    ate

    (A

    /min

    .)

    Tungsten and TEOS Removal Rate by Catalyst TypeMirra, IC1000, pH, 3psi

    W RR

    TEOS RR

    6371

    100

    150

    200

    250

    Tun

    gst

    en

    : T

    EO

    S

    RR

    Se

    lect

    ivit

    y

    Tungsten to TEOS Selectivity by Catalyst TypeMirra, IC1000, 3psi

    5/10/201311

    • Type C Solid Catalyst provides:- Highest W RR

    - Lowest TEOS RR

    - Highest W:TEOS Selectivity (>70:1 in Base Formula)

    - Also provides WIW NU benefit (later slide)

    0

    20

    40

    0

    1000

    Type A Type B Type C

    Tun

    gst

    en

    Re

    mo

    va

    l R

    ate

    (A

    /min

    .)

    Catalyst Type

    Control

    34

    0

    50

    Type A Type B Type C

    Tun

    gst

    en

    : T

    EO

    S

    RR

    Se

    lect

    ivit

    y

    Catalyst Type

    Control

  • Key Slurry ComponentsCorrosion Inhibitor Selection

    Static Etch Rate (SER)

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    Tun

    gst

    en

    Sta

    tic

    Etc

    h R

    ate

    (N

    orm

    ali

    zed

    )

    Tungsten Static Etch Rate by Corrosion Inhibtor Type40C

    • High Static Etch Rate (SER) has been correlated to tungsten corrosion.

    • Some Corrosion Inhibitors can reduce SER, but often also decrease tungsten Removal Rate.

    5/10/201312

    0

    1

    2

    3

    None Type A Type B Type C Type D

    Tun

    gst

    en

    Sta

    tic

    Etc

    h R

    ate

    (N

    orm

    ali

    zed

    )

    Corrosion Inhibitor

    Control

  • Key Slurry ComponentsCorrosion Inhibitor Selection

    Removal Rates Selectivity

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    TE

    OS

    Re

    mo

    va

    l R

    ate

    (A

    /min

    .)

    Tun

    gst

    en

    Re

    mo

    va

    l R

    ate

    (A

    /min

    .)

    Tungsten & TEOS Removal Rate by Corrosion Inhibtor TypeMirra, IC1000, 3psi

    W RR

    TEOS RR137

    109

    86

    110

    203

    100

    150

    200

    250

    Tun

    gst

    en

    : T

    EO

    S

    RR

    Se

    lect

    ivit

    y

    Tungsten to TEOS Selectivity by Corrosion Inhibtor Type

    Mirra, IC1000, 3psi

    • Corrosion Inhibitor Types A, B, & C reduce tungsten RR & Selectivity.

    • Corrosion Inhibitor Type D:- Does not reduce tungsten RR

    - Reduces TEOS RR

    - Increases W to TEOS Selectivity

    - Suppresses SER (previous slide)

    5/10/201313

    0

    20

    40

    0

    1000

    None Type A Type B Type C Type DT

    EO

    S R

    em

    ov

    al

    Ra

    te (

    A/m

    in.)

    Tun

    gst

    en

    Re

    mo

    va

    l R

    ate

    (A

    /min

    .)

    Corrosion Inhibitor

    Control0

    50

    None Type A Type B Type C Type D

    Tun

    gst

    en

    : T

    EO

    S

    RR

    Se

    lect

    ivit

    y

    Corrosion Inhibitor

    Control

  • Key Slurry ComponentsPrimary Abrasive Selection

    Removal Rates Selectivity

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    TE

    OS

    Re

    mo

    va

    l R

    ate

    (A

    /min

    .)

    Tun

    gst

    en

    Re

    mo

    va

    l R

    ate

    (A

    /min

    .)

    Tungsten & TEOS Removal Rate by Abrasive TypeMirra, IC1000, 3psi

    W RR

    TEOS RR

    182

    90 93

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    Tun

    gst

    en

    : T

    EO

    S

    RR

    Se

    lect

    ivit

    y

    Tungsten & TEOS Removal Rate by Abrasive TypeMirra, IC1000, 3psi

    • Presence of primary Abrasive, in addition to Solid Catalyst, is critical for providing tungsten removal rate.

    • Abrasive Type A or Type B show similar performance

    5/10/201314Air Products Internal Use Only

    0

    20

    40

    0

    1000

    None Type A Type BT

    EO

    S R

    em

    ov

    al

    Ra

    te (

    A/m

    in.)

    Tun

    gst

    en

    Re

    mo

    va

    l R

    ate

    (A

    /min

    .)

    Abrasive Type

    0

    50

    None Type A Type B

    Tun

    gst

    en

    : T

    EO

    S

    RR

    Se

    lect

    ivit

    y

    Abrasive Type

  • Tungsten Removal Rate Profiles60 sec. Polish Time

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    W R

    em

    ov

    al

    Ra

    te(A

    /60

    se

    c.)

    W Removal Rate Profile (40 sec.)Mirra, IC1000 Pad, 3 psi

    Control - wafer 1

    Control

    New Formulation

    5/10/201315

    0

    1000

    2000

    -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100

    W R

    em

    ov

    al

    Wafer Radius (mm)

    Control - wafer 1

    Control - wafer 2

    New Formulation - wafer 1

    New Formulation - wafer 2

    • New Formulation shows improve performance vs Control• Higher W Removal Rate• Improved WIW NU• Higher W : TEOS Selectivity (previous slides)

  • Tungsten Removal Profiles (40 sec.)Corrosion Inhibitor Type B vs Type D

    Catalyst Type A vs Type C

    Type C Catalyst

    Type A Catalyst

    Type B Corrosion Inhibitor Type D Corrosion InhibitorType C Catalyst

    Type A Catalyst

    Rem

    oval A

    mount

    (Å/40 s

    ec.)

    Rem

    oval A

    mount

    (Å/40 s

    ec.)

    5/10/201316

    Wafer Radius (mm) Wafer Radius (mm)

    • Corrosion Inhibitor Type D increases tungsten removal rate and improves RR non-uniformity (lower center to edge delta)

    • Catalyst Type C increases tungsten removal rate at the edge- Allows process tuning for the achievement of a potentially desirable fast edge

    removal rate

    Rem

    oval A

    mount

    (Å/40 s

    ec.)

    Rem

    oval A

    mount

    (Å/40 s

    ec.)

  • Summary• Tungsten was the First Metal Based CMP Process

    Implemented by the Semiconductor Industry.

    • CMP of Tungsten Films is a Unique Mechanism Requiring a Specialized CMP Slurry Formulation.

    • High Selectivity of W to SiO2 is Required to Minimize Dielectric Loss and Topography.Dielectric Loss and Topography.

    • Selection of Key Slurry Formulation Components is Critical for Achieving:- High Tungsten and Tunable Dielectric Removal Rates

    - Desired Tungsten Removal Rate Profile (WIW NU)

    - High or Tunable Selectivity

    - Low Corrosion (Defects)

    5/10/201317