Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
KEY QUESTIONS:
What does the future hold for digital transformation budgets and how will companies leverage technology to effect change?
P4
Can you really budget for digital transformation since it represents more than adoption of new technologies?
P2
Are budgets for transformational technologies increasing, decreasing or staying the same?
P3
KEY QUESTIONS:
DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION BUDGET TRENDS IN INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES
IFS WHITE PAPER Charles Rathmann, Senior Marketing Communications Analyst, North America, IFS
2 DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION TRENDS IN INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES
…While companies may need to budget for these technologies that enable transformation, it is the creative application of these technologies that can truly transform business models and drive business results beyond incremental year-over-year increases.
DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION BUDGET TRENDS IN INDUSTRIAL COMPANIESBY CHARLES RATHMANN
SENIOR MARKETING COMMUNICATIONS ANALYST, NORTH AMERICA
IFS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYDigital transformation may be the most frequently misunderstood and misused term in business discourse today. Technology vendors love to talk about digital transformation. But while digital transformation involves the use of digital technologies that may be purchased, simply adopting a new technology does not deliver digital transformation.
While companies may need to budget for the technologies that enable transformation, it is the creative application of these technologies that can truly transform business models and drive business results beyond incremental year-over-year increases.
Just as Uber enabled a startup company to harness the vehicles owned by independent contractors and dispatch them based on demand in real time, new technologies are being applied to transform existing, traditional industries including manufacturing, field service, oil and gas, and aerospace and defense. Thanks to the steady progression of technology adoption in many industries, we are seeing signifi-cant sea changes in the results of a primary research study conducted by IFS among 200 industrial executives. As new technologies become widely available, and as businesses adopt them, this in turn enables wholesale change in how organizations create and exchange value. We see this pattern playing out in the study results. Companion studies available from IFS also highlight how companies in specific industries are leveraging technology to augment product offerings with services or make manufacturing more responsive to customer demand. But in this document, we will look at planned expenditures among respondent companies. Are they planning to spend more or less on digital transformation in the years to come? What projects are currently funded? What types of disruptive technology have they already implemented? How will digital transformation affect who leads and who follows in coming years.
An analysis of study data provides significant takeaways:
• Just over half of respondents expect their budget for digital transformation initiatives to increase in the next two years. Less than 5 percent expect their budget to decrease, leaving a sizable minority of 42 percent expecting budgets to remain the same.
• Some companies are better prepared for digital transformation than
3 DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION TRENDS IN INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES
A 2017 IFS study…showed that 38 percent of respondents were Digital Transformation Laggards. Of that, 5 percent indicated their software was actually an impediment as opposed to under 3 percent in the 2018 study. This indicates a rapid increase in technological sophistication as the percentage of Digital Transformation Laggards has fallen by 18 percent.
others. Just over 20 percent of respondents said their enterprise software did not do a very good job of preparing them for digital transformation, or was actually an impediment. These companies—characterized in the study as Digital Transformation Laggards—exhibited lower adoption levels of crucial transformational technologies than their Digital Transformation Leader counterparts.
• Companies have already made software investments to prepare for digital transformation. A 2017 IFS study of a similar demographic showed that 38 percent of respondents were Digital Transformation Laggards. Of that, 5 percent indicated their software was actually an impediment as opposed to under 3 percent in the 2018 study. This indicates a rapid increase in technological sophistication as the percentage of Digital Transformation Laggards has fallen by 18 percent.
• Those who are behind on digital transformation are positioning themselves to catch up by budgeting more for transformational technologies. Digital Transformation Laggards were 6 percent more likely to say their budget would increase by 10 percent or more.
• While internet of things (IoT), augmented reality (AR) and artifi cial intelligence (AI) grab headlines, predictive analytics are the most frequently budgeted transformational technology for the next two years. Companies that already have analytics systems in place were more likely to identify themselves as Digital Transformation Leaders.
0.0%
50.0%
100.0%
150.0%
200.0%
250.0%
300.0%
350.0%
400.0%
450.0%
Increase Stay the Same Decrease
Digital Transformation Budget Trend
4 DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION TRENDS IN INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES
Digital Transformation Leaders had more transformational technology already in place. The largest gap was in analytics, where Digital Transformation Leaders were more likely to have systems in place that enabled them to “use data to predict rather than react.”
1. COMPANIES ARE BUDGETING AGGRESSIVELY FOR DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION.The majority of study respondents, 54 percent, said their budget for digital transformation was increasing. More than 36 percent said their budget would increase by more than 10 percent—which is a significant boost in a typical enterprise technology budget.
Digital Transformation Leaders had more transformational technology already in place. The largest gap was in analytics, where Digital Transformation Leaders were more likely to have systems in place that enabled them to “use data to predict rather than react.”
Interestingly, the two groups were nearly in a dead heat when it came to the IoT, and Digital Transformation Laggards were more likely to cite funded initiatives around AI.
Leaders Laggards 0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
For which of the following technologies do you have funded projects in place?
Mobility (access to enterprise software whenever and wherever)
IoT (observing and acting upon asset performance in real time)
Analytics (using data to predict rather than react)
Augmented Reality (adding data and context to the employee’s field of vision)
Artificial Intelligence (let the machines make the decisions)
Other
IFS’S RESPONSE
“Mobility and analytics are the most readily available transformational technologies, and current investment is going there broadly across industrial sectors. While Digital Transformation Laggards appear to be investing just as heavily in IoT and AI as other companies, that may be because they are investing in plant fl oor automation—which Digital Transformation Leaders already have in place. Digital Transformation Leaders would be more likely investing in IoT for business decision making. When you say AI to the Digital Transformation Leaders, they likely think of AI to support the business decision making process.”
RICK VEAGUE, CTO, NORTH AMERICA, IFS
5 DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION TRENDS IN INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES
While budgets for digital transformation initiatives are set to increase, there is evidence of investment in the past years. A comparison of the data in this study with data IFS collected from a similar sample in 2017 shows a 26 percent increase in Digital Transformation Leader status.
2. COMPANIES HAVE ALREADY RAPIDLY INCREASED THEIR READINESS FOR DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION.While budgets for digital transformation initiatives are set to increase, there is evidence of investment in the past years. A comparison of the data in this study with data IFS collected from a similar sample in 2017 shows a 26 percent increase in Digital Transformation Leader status.
Enterprise technologies may take months to implement and years to fully manifest and transform an organization. Therefore, the transformational technology likely responsible for this double-digit change is ERP software. In 2015, according to a Panorama Consulting study, 81 percent of companies had already implemented ERP software or were in the process of implementation. Software license sales revenue numbers also show a rapid increase in ERP software adoption that could contribute to a delta in digital transformation readiness. Statista data reveals that ERP software sales increased from $23.8 billion in 2011 to $25.4 billion in 2013, with expected growth to $34.4 billion in 2017.
As a whole, Digital Transformation Leaders were more likely than the sample to say their enterprise software—including ERP—had prepared them for digital transformation by:
• Providing native connectivity to data from the IoT
• Providing an open architecture so any part of the application can be exposed as a web service
• Being mobile-friendly across the entire application suite
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
Leaders Laggards
Increasing Digital Sophistication
2017
2018
6 DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION TRENDS IN INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES
Leaders Laggards 0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
What has your enterprise software done to help prepare your company for a digital transformation?
Native functionality to incorporate data from the Internet of Things.
Open architecture so any portion of the application can be exposed as a web service.
Mobile-friendly across the entire application suite (not just CRM or specific modules).
Offers native Android and/or iPhone apps for tasks commonly performed on the go.
Built-in role-specific dashboards so each user has key information at their fingertips.
Easy to configure and re-configure so the software can evolve with changing business processes.
Designed for easy and fast upgrades.
Artificial Intelligence.
Functionality to support Augmented Reality.
Functionality to support Virtual Reality.
Other (please specify)
IFS’S RESPONSE
“A lot more companies feel they are prepared for digital transformation now than a year ago. It is not likely that 20 percent of the market replaced their enterprise systems. It takes longer than that to Identify a project, select technology and implement. Some may have already had projects in place and seen them come to fruition. But a good per-centage are now, a year later, just more aware of the possibilities. There are simple wins to be had by leveraging more accessible tech-nologies like mobility and increasingly, IoT. Now that enterprise soft-ware vendors have planned their offerings around these technologies, the pace of change can pick up quickly. Those who cannot change at the pace of their competitors will be left behind.”
RICK VEAGUE, CTO, NORTH AMERICA, IFS
7 DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION TRENDS IN INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES
3. LAGGARDS AND SMALLER COMPANIES SETTING A COURSE TO CATCH UP.Digital Transformation Laggards are on a course to catch up to their more progressive counterparts, potentially disrupting markets as smaller, nimble companies overtake market leaders.
Among Digital Transformation Laggards, 22 percent expected their budget to increase by 10 percent or more, versus only 16 percent of Digital Transformation Leaders. The two groups were in a statistical dead heat when it came to those expecting their budget to increase by less than 10 percent. But 44 percent of Digital Transformation Leaders said they expected their budget to stay the same as opposed to only 29 percent of Digital Transformation Laggards.
As would be expected, the largest companies in the study—those with more than $5 billion in revenue—were most likely to report plans to increase digital transforma-tion budgets by more than 10 percent. While 28 percent of these large enterprises reported aggressive budget increases, the second most aggressive companies were middle-market companies with revenue between $100 million and $250 million. Next came $500 million and $1 billion, in a statistical dead heat with the smallest companies in the study—those with less than $50 million in revenue.
Leaders Laggards 0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
Do you expect your company’s budget for these and other digital transformation-enabling technologies to increase,
decrease or stay the same over the next two years?
Increase modestly (less than 10 percent)
Increase significantly (more than 10 percent)
Stay the same
Decrease modestly (less than 10 percent)
Decrease significantly (more than 10 percent)
Among Digital Transformation Laggards, 22 percent expected their budget to increase by 10 percent or more, versus only 16 percent of Digital Transformation Leaders.
8 DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION TRENDS IN INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES
$100-$250M $250-$500M $500M-$1B $1-$5B Over $5B $50-$100M Less Than $50M
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
Do you expect your company’s budget for these and other digital transformation-enabling technologies to increase, decrease
or stay the same over the next two years?
Increase modestly (less than 10 percent)
Increase significantly (more than 10 percent)
Stay the same
Decrease modestly (less than 10 percent)
Decrease significantly (more than 10 percent)
IFS’S RESPONSE
“At IFS, we are seeing more midsized companies investing in transformational technologies. The cost of technologies has come down whereas cost may have been prohibitive a few years ago. A lot more companies are providing access to IoT technology through highly accessible cloud and SaaS-based software solutions, and barriers to adoption are falling.”
RICK VEAGUE, CTO, NORTH AMERICA, IFS
9 DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION TRENDS IN INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES
METHODOLOGYIFS in North America designed a survey instrument to capture insights on how manufac-turers and other industrial companies were being affected by digital transformation. IFS then collaborated with the research arm of IEN, a joint venture between Thomas Register and Rich Media Group, which collected 200 survey respondents from a sample of indus- trial executives. Respondents were asked a screening question on whether they were involved with decisions about or usage of enterprise software in their company, and only those who responded in the affirmative were allowed to take the survey. Data collection and tabulation were managed by Jeff Reinke of IEN. IFS in North America reviewed these tabulations and cross-tabulations to draw inferences relevant to enterprise technology used to manage industrial organizations in specific NAICS codes including:
• Contractors:o 238220 – HVACo 515 – Telecomo 517 – Telecom
• Manufacturers that serviceo 332* – Fabricated Metal Manufacturerso 333* – Machine Manufacturerso 334510 – High Tech manufacturerso 3391 – Med Device
• General Manufacturingo 332*o 333*o 334*o 335*
o A – Excludes 334511 (Search, Detection, Navigation, Guidance, Aeronautical, and Nautical System and Instrument Manufacturing. See Defense Manufacturing table for details.
o B – Excludes 3364 (Aircraft Manufacturing) and 336992 (Military Vehicle Manufacturing). See Defense Manufacturing table for details.
• A&D Civil Aviationo 481*o 4881*o 488999
• Oil & Gaso 211*o 213111o 213112o 32411*o 4869*
• Food & Beverageo 311*o Exclude 3115 (Dairy Manufacturing, 3116 (Carcass Processing), and
31181 (Retail & Commercial Bakeries)o 312*
10 DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION TRENDS IN INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES
• Defense Manufacturingo 334511o 3364*o 336992
11 DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION TRENDS IN INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES
RESULTS
Can in
corpora
te data
from Io
T
Open a
rchite
cture
that c
an be
expo
sed a
s a web
Mobile
-frien
dly acro
ss th
e entire
applic
ation
suite
Native
Android an
d/or iP
hone a
pps
Built-in ro
le-sp
ecific
dashboa
rds
Easy t
o con
figure
and re
-config
ure
Design
ed fo
r eas
y and fa
st upgra
des
Artifici
al Intel
ligen
ce
Functi
onali
ty to
support
Augm
ented
Reality
Functi
onali
ty to
support
Virtual
Reality
Other
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
What has your enterprise software done to help prepare your company for a digital transformation?
Mobility (access to enterprise
software whenever and
wherever)
IoT (observing and acting upon
asset performance in
real time)
Analytics (using data to predict
rather than react)
Augmented Reality (adding
data and context to the employee’s
field of vision)
Artificial Intelligence (let the machines
make the decisions )
Other 0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
50.0%
For which of the following technologies do you have funded projects in place?
12 DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION TRENDS IN INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES
Increase modestly (less than 10
percent)
Increase significantly (more than 10
percent)
Stay the same Decrease modestly (less than 10
percent)
Decrease significantly (more than 10 percent)
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
35.0%
40.0%
45.0%
Do you expect your company’s budget for digital transformation-enabling technologies to increase,
decrease or stay the same over the next two years?
Very well Somewhat well Not very well It is an impediment 0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
How well does your enterprise software prepare you for digital transformation?
13 DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION TRENDS IN INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES
Food
& Bev
erage
HVA
C
Telec
ommunica
tions
Metal F
abricatio
n
Medica
l
Capital E
quipmen
t
Aeros
pace/A
viatio
n
Oil & Gas
Other 0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
Your company is most closely aligned with which of the following industry segments:
$100-$250M $50-$100M $250-$500M $500M-$1B $1-$5B Over $5B Less Than $50M
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
Your company’s estimated annual revenue is:
En0
37
2-1
Pro
duct
ion:
IFS
Cor
por
ate
Mar
keti
ng,
July
20
18
IFSworld.comCOPYRIGHT © 2018 INDUSTRIAL AND FINANCIAL SYSTEMS, IFS AB. IFS AND ALL IFS PRODUCTS AND SERVICES NAMES ARE TRADEMARKS OF IFS. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THIS DOCUMENT MAY CONTAIN STATEMENTS OF POSSIBLE FUTURE FUNCTIONALIT Y FOR IFS’S PRODUCTS AND TECHNOLOGY. SUCH STATEMENTS ARE FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD NOT BE INTERPRETED AS ANY COMMITMENT OR REPRESENTATION. THE NAMES OF ACTUAL COMPANIES AND PRODUCTS MENTIONED HEREIN MAY BE THE TRADEMARKS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS.
IFS AB ©2018
IFS develops and delivers enterprise software for customers around the world who manufacture and distribute goods, maintain assets, and manage service-focused operations. The industry expertise of our people and solutions, together with commitment to our customers, has made us a recognized leader and the most recommended supplier in our sector. Our team of 3,500 employees supports more than 10,000 customers worldwide from a network of local offices and through our growing ecosystem of partners. For more information about IFS, visit IFSworld.com
AMERICAS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +1 888 437 4968
ARGENTINA, BRAZIL, CANADA, ECUADOR, MEXICO, UNITED STATES
ASIA PACIFIC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +65 63 33 33 00
AUSTRALIA, INDONESIA, JAPAN, MALAYSIA, NEW ZEALAND, PHILIPPINES, PR CHINA, SINGAPORE, THAILAND
EUROPE EAST AND CENTRAL ASIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +48 22 577 45 00
BALKANS, CZECH REPUBLIC, GEORGIA, HUNGARY, ISRAEL, KAZAKHSTAN, POLAND, RUSSIA AND CIS, SLOVAKIA, TURKEY, UKRAINE
EUROPE CENTRAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +49 9131 77 340
AUSTRIA, BELGIUM, GERMANY, ITALY, NETHERLANDS, SWITZERLAND
EUROPE WEST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +44 1494 428 900
FRANCE, IRELAND, PORTUGAL, SPAIN, UNITED KINGDOM
MIDDLE EAST AND AFRICA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .+971 4390 0888
INDIA, SOUTH AFRICA, SRI LANKA, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
SCANDINAVIA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .+46 13 460 4000
DENMARK, NORWAY, SWEDEN
FINLAND AND THE BALTIC AREA. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . +358 102 17 9300
ESTONIA, FINLAND, LATVIA, LITHUANIA
ABOUT IFS