Upload
jane-young
View
215
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Discussion of Unpaid Claim Estimate Standard
Raji BhagavatulaMary Frances MillerJason Russ
November 13, 2006
CAS Annual Meeting
San Francisco, CA
2
Background
Guidance in estimating unpaid claims, applicable to most work, not just opinion work
Exposure draft released in March Comment period through June 32 comments received In process of reviewing comments and amending
proposed standard Have not finalized revisions to standard – thoughts
expressed today are still being considered
3
Main Points of Discussion
Title of standard Scope of standard Consideration of purpose and use Handling of constraints Identification of scope of work Understanding of nature of claims Methods and models Assumptions Uncertainty Communications and Disclosures
4
Title of Standard
“Unpaid Claim Estimates,” not “Reserves” Comments received argued both ways “Reserves” is a line item on a US financial
statement, not the estimate of future payments itself, but improper usage common in US
“Unpaid claim estimates” is more accurate, more generic and better accepted globally
5
Scope of Standard
Includes evaluation of self-insureds, not just insurance entities
Excludes ratemaking purposes– Some comments expressed disagreement, but deemed
necessary to limit scope Excludes oral communication– Some comments expressed disagreement, but practical
necessity Excludes any actions taken after production of
unpaid claim estimate
6
Consideration of Purpose and Use
Should identify in communication Has an impact on many items, such as– Selection of intended measure– Choice of method or model– Whether uncertainty needs to be measured– Presentation of results– Documentation and disclosures
Once the intended measure is decided, the purpose and use should not bias the estimate relative to that intended measure
7
Handling of Constraints
Sometimes constraints exist in the performance of an actuarial analysis, such as those due to limited data, staff or time. Where the actuary believes that such constraints create a significant risk that a more in-depth analysis would produce a materially different result, the actuary should notify the principal of that risk and attempt to discuss the constraints on the analysis with the principal.
8
Scope of Work
Must identify what you are estimating:– Intended measure– Gross or net– Collectibility risk– Unpaid claim adjustment expenses– Cohorts of claims– Other items needed to sufficiently describe
scope
9
Intended Measure
Want it to be clear what the actuary is estimating – “Best Estimate” or “Actuarial Estimate” not sufficient– Best estimate of what? Mean? Mode? Low or High?
Risk margin included? Etc. Original exposure draft introduced term “Actuarial
Central Estimate” to use as a default Many comments concerning whether a default should
exist and if so what it should be– Concerns that ACE as default advocates something
biased lower than desired Discussing option of removing default – require
disclosure of intended measure in all cases
10
Actuarial Central Estimate
Defined in exposure draft – “An estimate that represents a mean excluding remote or speculative outcomes that, in the actuary’s professional judgment, is neither optimistic nor pessimistic. An actuarial central estimate may or may not be the result of the use of a probability distribution or a statistical analysis. This definition is intended to clarify the concept rather than assign a precise statistical measure, as commonly used actuarial methods typically do not result in a statistical mean.”
Intention was for definition to cover estimates produced by “typical” actuarial methods such as loss development
Never intention to imply this is estimate actuary should produce
Considering retaining term with reworded definition, but not as default – gives actuary option to use term rather than re-define in own communication.
11
Understanding Nature of Claims
Should have an understanding appropriate to the analysis
Will not include a long list of considerations as existed in original Principles– Such educational material is better suited for practice
notes than for standards or principles
12
Methods and Models
Consider what is appropriate, even if same method as used before
Original exposure draft only mentioned “methods”, adding “models” to language in response to comments
Significant discussion on language concerning use of multiple methods– Want to encourage use of more than one method– Under what circumstances can the actuary use just one
method?
13
Assumptions
Consider what is reasonable and appropriate given intended measure– Assumptions should “have no known significant bias to
underestimation or overestimation of the identified intended measure”
– Bias with regard to an expected value estimate would not necessarily be bias with regard to a measure intended to be higher or lower than an expected value estimate
Consider sensitivity of result to alternative assumptions
May rely on assumptions provided by principal, with appropriate disclosure
14
Uncertainty
Some comments received stating actuaries should be encouraged or required to measure uncertainty
This may or may not be appropriate given the situation
Language will require consideration of uncertainty, but not necessarily measurement
15
Communications and Disclosures
General guidance in other ASOPs – ASOP 9, ASOP 23, ASOP 41
Additional communication and disclosure requirements specific to this standard
This does “raise the bar”, particularly for company actuaries
16
Communications and Disclosures
Clearly convey the intended purpose or use– More than one intended use?– Any compromises in order to produce a single
work product for multiple intended uses? Any resource constraint issues? Clearly define the scope of the estimate Include discussion of the uncertainties in
the estimated claim liability
17
Communications and Disclosures - Dates
Actuarial communication should include– Accounting date– Valuation date
Review date may have to be included in certain circumstances
As an example, “This unpaid claim estimate as of December 31, 2005 was based on data evaluated as of November 30, 2005 and additional information provided to me through January 17, 2006”
18
Communications and Disclosures – Significant Events and Assumptions
Include explicit discussion of any significant assumptions or events underlying the estimate that may not be obvious to the intended audience, including significant assumptions regarding the accounting basis or application of an accounting rule
Where the final work product reflects a material assumption or methodology that differs from what the actuary believes to be reasonable – Disclose the dependency of the final result and
– Disclose the source
19
Communications and Disclosures – Ranges
What is the range intended to convey? For example:– a range of estimates of the actuarial central
estimate; – a range representing a confidence interval
within the range of outcomes produced by a particular model or models;
– a range representing a confidence interval reflecting both process and parameter risk;
– some other clearly defined range
20
Communications and Disclosures – Material Changes
If the analysis is an update, disclose any material changes in assumptions to the extent known by the actuary
Disclose the reasons for the change Not required to quantify the effect