47
CHAPTER – I INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background of the Study “Dividend policy for business organization is a very important decision, which depends upon the long-term and short-term strategy of a firm. Dividend policy of a firm is an effect of dividing its net earning into two parts: the retained earnings and dividend payment.” (Pandey; 1999: 770) Business firms use the retained earnings to provide funds to the firm for long-term growth; we call it as internal financing source also. “Dividend is that portion of earning, which is paid to the common stock holders, is a return on their investment. By a dividend policy we mean some kind of consistent approaches to the distribution versus retention decision rather than making the decision on the purely ad hoc basis from period to period.” (Pearson, William & Gordon; 1972: 405) Likewise, dividend policy must be considered in relation to the overall financing decision. In practice, net earnings always may not be appropriate measure of the ability of the firm to pay dividend, that's why, what and how much it is desirable to pay dividend is always a controversial topic because shareholders expect higher dividend but companies ensure towards setting aside funds for maximizing the shareholders’ wealth. 1

Dividend-policy-Tanmay.pdf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • CHAPTER I

    INTRODUCTION

    !1.1 Background of the Study

    Dividend policy for business organization is a very important decision, which

    depends upon the long-term and short-term strategy of a firm. Dividend policy of a

    firm is an effect of dividing its net earning into two parts: the retained earnings and

    dividend payment. (Pandey; 1999: 770) Business firms use the retained earnings to

    provide funds to the firm for long-term growth; we call it as internal financing source

    also. Dividend is that portion of earning, which is paid to the common stock holders,

    is a return on their investment. By a dividend policy we mean some kind of consistent

    approaches to the distribution versus retention decision rather than making the

    decision on the purely ad hoc basis from period to period. (Pearson, William &

    Gordon; 1972: 405)

    !Likewise, dividend policy must be considered in relation to the overall financing

    decision. In practice, net earnings always may not be appropriate measure of the

    ability of the firm to pay dividend, that's why, what and how much it is desirable to

    pay dividend is always a controversial topic because shareholders expect higher

    dividend but companies ensure towards setting aside funds for maximizing the

    shareholders wealth.

    ! 1

  • When a company pays out a portion of it's earnings to the shareholders in the form of

    dividend, the shareholders are directly benefited. If company is hopeful to exploit

    other growth opportunities, the firm can avoid for paying cash dividends. In this

    condition, shareholders consider their future growth of their stock instead of getting

    cash dividend. On the other hand, the firm has to pay enough dividends to satisfy

    investors. If they are paid higher dividends, the market price of the stock also rises.

    This means of maximizing the shareholder's wealth. Thus shareholders wealth

    (return) can be increased through either dividends or capital gains. As the division and

    retention are considered as dividend policy, all aspects and questions related to the

    payment of dividends are contained in dividend policy.

    !Financial institutions have definitely contributed and played a gigantic role for

    domestic resource mobilization and economic development to build up the confidence

    of the businessmen for promoting their business and industrialists for encouraging

    opening new business venture. It maintains confidence for various segments and

    extends credit to people. (Hastings; 1996: 72)

    The banking concepts and activities started in Nepal only after the establishment of

    Nepal Bank Limited in 1937. A central bank (Nepal Rastra Bank) was established to

    regulate the banking activities and, declare & implement monetary policy of the

    nation. Then after, it was realised that the commercial bank has its own role and

    contribution in the economic development. It is the source of economic development;

    it maintains economic confidence of various segments and extends credit to people.

    So, another commercial bank, Rastriya Banijya Bank was established on 1966.

    ! 2

  • Capital market plays an important role in the economics development of a nation. But,

    in Nepal, the capital market is very small and developing slowly with disorganized.

    The Nepalese companies (especially government enterprises) have not been able to

    generate sufficient as compared to the organizations that are established and operated

    on public sector. Hence the government is not receiving dividends from public

    enterprises for several years.

    In the global perspective, joint ventures are the modes of trading through partnership

    among the nations and also a form of negotiation between various groups of industries

    and traders to achieve competitive advantages. Nepal's reform efforts in the financial

    sectors, begun in 1980's, when Nepal Rastra Bank eased entry restrictions and

    amendment of the Commercial Bank Act 1974. As a result, three banks namely,

    NABIL Bank Ltd, Nepal Investment Bank Ltd. and Standard Chartered Bank Nepal

    Ltd. came into operation prior to 1990s. In 1992, Nepal Rastra Bank adopted liberal

    outlook in permitting commercial banks to open. Then after, the financial

    liberalization really took place. Many more banks came into operation making the

    total number of the commercial banks to twenty five.

    Dividend practice in public corporations is still having problem for taking dividend

    policy. Thus, here neither corporation are able to generate sufficient earnings for

    dividend payment nor is the government expecting dividends, since it has been

    observed that dividend payment is practically a crucial problem of the public

    corporations. Corporation like Nepal Oil Corporation and Nepal Electricity Authority

    ! 3

  • are not distributing earnings as dividend but total effort is focused on minimization of

    losing through better utilization of capital. Noticeable matter is that this shifting aim

    of public corporation is failed to minimize the losses.

    The joint venture banks in Nepal have brought new hope for productive mobilization

    of funds according to their new trends of dividend.

    Although, twenty eight commercial banks are in operation in the nation; only twenty

    one commercial banks are listed in security board, on the Nepal Stock Exchange. Out

    of which only five commercial banks have been taken as sample. They are as follows:

    a. Standard Chartered Bank Nepal Ltd.

    b. Nepal Arab Bank Ltd.

    c. Everest Bank Ltd

    d. Bank of Kathmandu Ltd.

    e. Himalayan Bank Ltd.

    !!

    1. Profile of the Selected Banks

    a) Standard Chartered Bank Nepal Limited

    Standard Chartered Bank Nepal Limited has been in operation in Nepal since 1987.

    The Bank is an integral part of Standard Chartered Group having an ownership of

    75% and the balance owned by the Nepalese public. The Bank is the largest

    international bank currently operating in Nepal.

    !! 4

  • With 17 points of representation, 21 ATMs and more than 375 local staff, Standard

    Chartered Bank Nepal Ltd. is in a position to serve its customers through an extensive

    domestic network. In addition, the global network of Standard Chartered Group gives

    the Bank a unique opportunity to provide truly international banking services in

    Nepal. Standard Chartered Bank Nepal Limited offers a full range of banking

    products and services in Wholesale and Consumer banking. The Bank has been the

    pioneer in introducing customer focused products and services and aspires to

    continue to be a leader in introducing new products in delivering superior services.

    Corporate Social Responsibility is an integral part of Standard Chartereds ambition to

    become the worlds best international bank and is the mainstay of the Banks values.

    !b) Nabil Bank Limited

    Nabil Bank Limited, the first foreign joint venture bank of Nepal, started operations in

    July 1984. Nabil was incorporated with the objective of extending international

    standard modern banking services to various sectors of the society. Pursuing its

    objective, Nabil provides a full range of commercial banking services through its 40

    points of representation across the nation and over 170 reputed correspondent banks

    across the globe.

    Nabil, as a pioneer in introducing many innovative products and marketing concepts

    in the domestic banking sector, represents a milestone in the banking history of Nepal

    as it started an era of modern banking with customer satisfaction measured as a focal

    objective while doing business. Operations of the bank including day-to-day

    operations and risk management are managed by highly qualified and experienced

    ! 5

  • management team. Bank is fully equipped with modern technology which includes

    ATMs, credit cards, state-of-art, world-renowned software from Infosys Technologies

    System, Banglore, India, Internet banking system and Telebanking system.

    !c) Everest Bank Limited

    Everest Bank Limited (EBL) started its operations in 1994 with a view and objective

    of extending professionalized and efficient banking services to various segments of

    the society. The bank is providing customer-friendly services through its Branch

    Network. All the branches of the bank are connected through Anywhere Branch

    Banking System (ABBS), which enables customers for operational transactions from

    any branches. Moreover, EBL was one of the first bank to introduce Any Branch

    Banking System (ABBS) in Nepal.

    !In addition, EBL has introduced Mobile Vehicle Banking system to serve the segment

    deprived of proper banking facilities through its Birtamod Branch, which is the first

    of its kind. EBL has introduced branchless banking system first time in Nepal to cover

    unbanked sector of Nepalese society. EBL is first bank that has launched e-ticketing

    system in Nepal. EBL customer can buy yeti airlines ticket through internet.

    With an aim to help Nepalese citizens working abroad, the bank has entered into

    arrangements with banks and finance companies in different countries, which enable

    quick remittance of funds by the Nepalese citizens in countries like UAE, Kuwait,

    Bahrain, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Singapore and UK.

    !! 6

  • d) Bank of Kathmandu Limited

    Bank of Kathmandu started its operation in March 1995 with the objective to

    stimulate the Nepalese economy and take it to newer heights. BOK also aims to

    facilitate the nation's economy and to become more competitive globally. To achieve

    these, BOK has been focusing on its set objectives right from the beginning.

    !The bank targets to contribute to the sustainable development of the nation by

    mobilizing domestic savings and channeling them to productive area, to use the latest

    banking technology to provide better, reliable and efficient services at a reasonable

    cost, to facilitate trade by making financial transactions easier, faster and more

    reliable through relationships with foreign banks and money transfer agencies and to

    contribute to the overall social development of Nepal. Bank of Kathmandu Limited

    (BOK) has today become a landmark in the Nepalese banking sector by being among

    the few commercial banks which is entirely managed by Nepalese professionals and

    owned by the general public.

    !e) Himalayan Bank Limited

    Himalayan Bank was established in 1993 in joint venture with Habib Bank Limited of

    Pakistan. Despite the cut-throat competition in the Nepalese Banking sector,

    Himalayan Bank has been able to maintain a lead in the primary banking activities-

    Loans and Deposits. Legacy of Himalayan lives on in an institution that's known

    throughout Nepal for its innovative approaches to merchandising and customer

    service. Products such as Premium Savings Account, HBL Proprietary Card and

    ! 7

  • Millionaire Deposit Scheme besides services such as ATMs and Tele-banking were

    first introduced by HBL.

    !All Branches of HBL are integrated into Globus (developed by Temenos), the single

    Banking software where the Bank has made substantial investments. This has helped

    the Bank provide services like Any Branch Banking Facility, Internet Banking and

    SMS Banking. Living up to the expectations and aspirations of the Customers and

    other stakeholders of being innovative, HBL very recently introduced several new

    products and services. Millionaire Deposit Scheme, Small Business Enterprises Loan,

    Pre-paid Visa Card, International Travel Quota Credit Card, Consumer Finance

    through Credit Card and online TOEFL, SAT, IELTS, etc. fee payment facility are

    some of the products and services. HBL also has a dedicated offsite Disaster

    Recovery Management System.

    ! 8

  • !1.2 Statements of the Problem

    Dividend is desirable for the shareholders, which inspires them for the further

    investment on company's shares. But it is found that there is no satisfactory result

    about dividend decision of commercial banks in Nepal. Likewise, dividend

    distribution does not match with the earnings of the commercial banks, there does not

    exist a proper relationship between dividend and quoted market price of share.

    Similarly, commercial banks with lower returns record stable (rigid) price of share

    and banks making sound returns do not rigid in share price.

    !Dividend, the most inspiring factor for the investment on shares of the corporation, is

    an important aspect of financial management because the dividend policy determines

    the division of earnings between payment to stockholders and reinvestment in the

    firm to exploit growth opportunities. It affects the value of firm as well as overall

    financing decision such as financial structure, the flow of funds, corporate liquidity

    and investors satisfaction.

    !The dividend decision, however, is still a crucial as well as controversial area of

    managerial finance. There is no consensus among the financial scholars on this

    subject matter and its relation with stock price. Some financial scholars say that stock

    prices are least influenced by dividend per share while some others believe that its

    relevance to the stock prices is quite significant. The idea of relevance is vague as

    well. It is rather hard to define whether dividend per share has positive effect or its

    effect is negative one.

    ! 9

  • !Thus for the study, the following research problems have been raised;

    a) What is the situation of earning and dividend distribution of commercial banks

    of Nepal?

    b) What impacts do DPS and DPR and have on the MPS of the bank?

    c) Does the dividend yield and the joint effect of DPS and EPS changes the

    MPS?

    d) What will be the trend of DPS, DPR and MPS of the commercial banks in

    forthcoming years?

    !1.3 Objective of the Study

    The study primarily focuses on the dividend practices of commercial banks with a

    view to suggest ways to maximize the shareholders return, i.e. value of their

    investment is maximized. Followings are the specific objectives of the study.

    a) To analyze the earnings and the dividend distribution of the commercial banks.

    b) To examine the impact of DPS on MPS, and the effect of dividend payout ratio

    on the MPS, and the joint effect of EPS and DPS on MPS.

    c) To evaluate the relationship of dividend yield on DPS, EPS and MPS of the

    corresponding bank.

    d) To estimate the value of DPS, MPS and DPR for the forthcoming two fiscal

    years.

    !

    ! 10

  • 1.4 Significance of the Study

    Due to excess liquidity and lack of investment opportunities in the capital market,

    nowadays people are very much interested and attracted to invest in shares for getting

    higher returns. When any new company issues (floats) shares through capital markets,

    very big congregation gathers to apply for owner's certificate. It reveals that people

    have expectation on higher return for investing in shares. So the dividend decision is

    one of the most important decisions of financial management. It is an effective tool

    (way) to attract new investors, maintain present investors and controlling position of

    the firm.

    Having lack of adequate knowledge, the people are haphazardly investing in shares. It

    shows that there is an extreme necessity to establish clear conception about the return

    that yields from investing in securities. In the Nepalese perspective, we find that there

    exist almost none of the companies adopting consistent dividend policy. There may be

    many reasons behind it. But there is not sufficient study conducted in this regard.

    Therefore, considering all these facts, the study is undertaken which will help to meet

    deficiency of the literature relating to dividend practice and price of stock. So this

    study is of considerable importance.

    !So many persons and parties such as shareholders, management of banks, financial

    institutions, general public (depositors, prospective customers, investors etc.) and

    other policy making bodies which are concerned with banking (especially NABIL

    Bank Ltd, Standard Chartered Bank Ltd., Everest Bank Ltd., Bank of Kathmandu and

    Himalayan Bank Ltd.) business will be benefited from this study. It is also believed

    that it will provide valuable inputs for future research scholars.

    ! 11

  • 1.5 Limitations of the Study

    The limitations of the study are as follows:

    a) The accuracy of secondary data depends on the reliability of the annual reports

    of the concerned banks.

    b) The study is focused only on dividend practice, earning and price of stock only

    and does not cover the other financial aspects.

    c) Only five banks are taken as samples to fulfill the objectives of the study.

    d) This study covers five fiscal year period only, i.e. from 2004/05 to 2008/09.

    e) Limited time and resources are also constraints.

    !1.6 Chapter Scheme

    The study has been organized into five chapters;

    !Chapter I: Introduction

    It consists of background of the study, statement of the problem, objectives of the

    study, significance of the study and limitation of the study.

    !Chapter II: Review of Literature

    It includes a discussion on the conceptual framework on dividend and its practices. It

    also reviews the major studies relating with dividend decision of several authors/

    researchers and from the several books, journals and article, and thesis.

    !Chapter III: Research Methodology

    ! 12

  • It explains the research methodology used to evaluate dividend practices of

    commercial banks in Nepal. It consists of research design, population and sample,

    source of data collection, method of analysis financial tools and statistical tools used

    in the analysis.

    !Chapter IV: Data Presentation and Analysis

    Chapter four fulfills the objective of the study by presenting data and analyzing them

    with the help of various statistical tools as per methodology. It is concluded with the

    findings of the study.

    !Chapter V: Summary, Conclusion and Recommendations

    It states summary, conclusion and recommendation of the study based on the data

    presentation and its analysis using the tools used in the analysis.

    !Besides these chapters, Bibliography and Appendix are also included at the end of

    the study.

    ! 13

  • Chapter II: Review of Literature

    DIVIDEND DECISION AND VALUE OF FIRM:

    The value of the firm can be maximized if the shareholders wealth is maximized.

    There are contradictory views about the impact of dividend decision on the value of

    the firm.

    According to one school of thought dividend decision does not affect the

    shareholders wealth and hence the value of the firm. On the other hand, according to

    the other school of thought, dividend decision significantly affects the shareholders

    wealth and also the value of the firm. There are the views of the two schools of

    thought under two groups:

    a. The Relevance Concept of Dividend or the Theory of Relevance

    b. The Irrelevance Concept of Dividend or the Theory of Irrelevance

    The Relevance Concept of Dividends: According to this school of thought,

    dividends are relevant and the amount of dividend paid affects the value of the firm.

    Walter, Gordon and others advocated that dividend decisions are important in

    determining the value of the firm. Walter argues that the choices of dividend policies

    almost and always affect the value of the enterprise.

    The Irrelevance Concept of Dividend: The other school of thought propounded by

    Modigliani and Miller in 1961. According to MM approach, the dividend policy of a

    firm is irrelevant and it does not affect the wealth of the shareholders. They advocate

    that the value of the firm depends on the market price of the share; the dividend

    decision is of no use in determining the value of the firm.

    WALTERS MODEL:

    ! 14

  • Walters model, clearly indicates that the choice of appropriate dividend policy

    always affects the value of the enterprise. Professor James E.

    Walter has very scholarly studied the importance of the relationship between the

    firms internal rate of return, r, (or actual capitalization rate) and its Cost of Capital,

    Ke (normal capitalization rate) in determining such dividend policy as will maximize

    the wealth of the stockholders.

    Walters model is based on the following premises:

    1) The firm finance its entire investments by means of retained earnings. New equity

    stock or debenture is not issued to raise funds.

    2) Internal rate of return (r) and cost of capital (Ke) of the firm remain constant.

    3) The firms earnings are either distributed as dividends or reinvested internally.

    4) Earnings and dividends of the firm never change.

    5) The firm has long or infinite life.

    The formula used by Walter to determine the market price per share is:

    !

    Where,

    P = Market price per share

    D = Dividend per share

    E = Earnings per share

    r = Internal rate of return (Actual capitalization rate)

    K = Cost capital (External capitalization rate)

    ! 15

  • It may be noted that Walters formula has the same effect as the continuing dividend

    growth formula. It seeks to measure the effect of dividends on common stock value

    by comparing actual and normal capitalization rates.

    Another characteristic of Walters formula is that it provides an added or reduced

    Weight to the retained earnings portion of the capitalization earnings formula. The

    factors r and k are placed in front of retained earnings to change its weighted value

    under different situations as discussed below:

    !1. Growth Firms:

    In growth firms internal rate of return is greater than the normal rate(r > k). Therefore,

    r/k factor will greater than 1.

    Such firms must reinvest retained earnings since existing alternative investments offer

    a lower return than the firm is able to secure. Each rupee of retained earnings will

    have a higher weighting in Walters formula than a comparable rupee of dividends.

    Thus, large the firm retains, higher the value of the firm. Optimum dividend payout

    ratio for such a firm will be zero.

    2. Normal Firm

    Normal firms comprise those firms whose internal rate of return is equal to normal

    capitalization (r=k). These firms earn on their investments rate of return equal to

    market rate of return. For such firms dividend policy will have no effect on the market

    value per share in the Walters model. Accordingly, retained earnings will have the

    same weighted value as dividends. In this case the market value per share is affected

    by the payout ratio.

    3. Declining Firms

    ! 16

  • Firms which earn on their investments less than the minimum rate required are

    designated as declining firms. The management of such firms would like to distribute

    its earnings to the stockholders so that they may either spend it or invest elsewhere to

    earn higher return than earned by the declining firms. Under such a situation each

    rupee of retained earnings will receive lower weight than dividends and market value

    of the firm will tend to be maximum when it does not retain earnings at all.

    4. Evaluation of the Walters Model

    Professor Walter has endeavoured to show in an erudite manner the effects of

    dividend policy on value of equity shares under different situations of a firm.

    However, the basic premises on which edifice of the theory are laid down are

    unrealistic and therefore, conclusions drawn from the Walters model are hardly true

    for real life situations.

    !Thus, for instance assume that a firm finances its investment opportunities only by

    means of internal sources and no external financing is resorted to for this purpose.

    Under such a situation, either the value of the firms investment or dividend or both

    will be sub-optimum.

    In its attempt to maximize the value of the firm, the management should go on

    making investments so long as return of investment is equal to the cost of capital.

    This is the optimum level of investment; the remaining amount should be raised from

    external sources. On the contrary, Walter argues that value of the firm is maximized

    by retaining all the profits because magnitude of investments financed by retained

    earnings may be less than the optimum level of investment.

    ! 17

  • Further, Professor Walter has assumed that r remains constant under all the

    situations. As

    a matter of fact, r tends to decrease in correspondence with increase in level of

    investments.

    This is why it is suggested that the management should make investments upto

    optimal level where r = k.

    Finally, assumption of constant cost of capital k is incorrect. On the contrary, it varies

    in tune with change in risk of the firm.

    !Illustration 1 : The earnings per share of a company is Rs. 8 and the rate of

    capitalisation applicable is 10%. The company has before it an option of adopting (i)

    50%, (ii) 75% and (iii)100% dividend payout ratio. Compute the market price of the

    companys quoted

    shares as per Walters model if it can earn a return of (i) 15%, (ii) 10% and (iii) 5% on

    its retained earnings.

    Computation of market price of Companys share by applying Walters formula

    !

    Now, we can calculate the market price per share based on different IRRs and

    dividend payout rations.

    (i) Market price per share when Ra = 15%

    (a) When dividend payout ratio is 50%

    Dividend paid = 8 50/100 = Rs. 4

    ! 18

  • !

    !(b) When dividend payout ratio is 75%

    Dividend paid = Rs. 875/100 = Rs. 6

    !

    !(c) When dividend payout ratio is 100%

    i.e., dividend paid = Rs. 8

    !

    !

    ! 19

  • !

    GORDONS MODEL:

    Myron Gordon has also developed a model on the lines of Prof. Walter suggesting

    that dividends are relevant and the dividend decision of the firm affects its value. His

    basic valuation model is based on the following assumptions:

    1. The firm is an all equity firm.

    2. No external financing is available or used. Retained earnings represent the only

    source of financing investment programmes.

    3. The rate of return on the firms investment r, is constant.

    4. The retention ratio, b, once decided upon is constant. Thus, the growth rate of the

    firm (g = br), is also constant.

    5. The cost of capital for the firm remains constant and it is greater than the growth

    rate, i.e. k > br.

    6. The firm has perpetual life.

    7. Corporate taxes do not exist.

    ! 20

  • According to Gordon, the market value of a share is equal to the present value of

    future stream of dividends. Thus, Gordons basic valuation formula is as under:

    !

    OR

    !

    !Where,

    P = Price of shares

    E = Earnings per share

    b = Retention Ratio

    ke = Cost of equity capital

    br = g = growth rate in r, i.e., rate of return on investment of an all-equity firm

    D = Dividend per share

    The implications of Gordons basic valuation model may be summarized as below :

    1. When the rate of return of firms investment is greater than the required rate of

    return, i.e. when r > k, the price per share increases as the dividend payout ratio

    decreases.

    Thus, growth firm should distribute smaller dividends and should retain maximum

    earnings.

    2. When the rate of return is equal to the required rate of return, i.e, when r = k, the

    price per share remains unchanged and is not affected by dividend policy. Thus, for a

    normal firm there is no optimum dividend payout.

    ! 21

  • 3. When the rate of return is less than the required rate of return, i.e., when r
  • MODIGLIANI-MILLERS MODEL (M-MS MODEL) :

    Modigliani-Millers (M-Ms) thoughts for irrelevance of dividends are most

    comprehensive and logical. According to them, dividend policy does not affect the

    value of a firm and is therefore, of no consequence. It is the earning potentiality and

    investment policy of the firm rather than its pattern of distribution of earnings that

    affects value of the firm.

    Basic Assumptions of M-M Approach

    (1) There exists perfect capital market where all investors are rational. Information is

    available to all at no cost; there are no transaction costs and floatation costs. There is

    no such investor as could alone influence market value of shares.

    (2) There does not exist taxes. Alternatively, there is no tax differential between

    income on dividend and capital gains.

    (3) Firm has uncertainty as to future investments and profits of the firm. Thus,

    investors are able to predict future prices and dividend with certainty. This assumption

    is dropped by M-M later.

    M-Ms irrelevance approach is based on arbitrage argument. Arbitrage is the process

    of entering into such transactions simultaneously as exactly balance or completely

    offset each other. The two transactions in the present case are payment of dividends

    and garnering funds to exploit investment opportunities. Suppose, for example, a firm

    decides to invest in a project it has alternatives:

    (1) Pay out dividends and raise an equal amount of funds from the market;

    (2) Retain its entire earnings to finance the investment programme. The arbitrage

    process is involved where a firm decides to pay dividends and raise funds from

    outside.

    ! 23

  • When a firm pays its earnings as dividends, it will have to approach market for

    procuring funds to meet a given investment programme. Acquisition of additional

    capital will dilute the firms share capital which will result in drop in share values.

    Thus, what the stockholders gain in cash dividends they lose in decreased share

    values. The market price before and after payment of dividend would be identical and

    hence the stockholders would be indifferent between dividend and retention of

    earnings. This suggests that dividend decision is irrelevant.

    M-Ms argument of irrelevance of dividend remains unchanged whether external

    funds are obtained by means of share capital or borrowings. This is for the fact that

    investors are indifferent between debt and equity with respect to leverage and cost of

    debt is the same as the real cost of equity.

    Finally, even under conditions of uncertainty, divided decision will be of no relevance

    because of operation of arbitrage. Market value of share of the two firms would be the

    same if they identical with respect to business risk, prospective future earnings and

    investment policies.

    This is because of rational behavior of investor who would prefer more wealth to less

    wealth.

    Difference in respect of current and future dividend policies cannot influence share

    values of the two firms.

    M-M approach contains the following mathematical formulations to prove irrelevance

    of dividend decision.

    The market value of a share in the beginning of the year is equal to the present value

    of dividends paid at the year end plus the market price of the share at the end of the

    year, this can be expressed as below :

    ! 24

  • !

    Where,

    P0 = Existing price of a share

    K = Cost of capital

    D1 = Dividend to be received at the year end

    P1 = Market value of a share at the year end

    If there is no additional financing from external sources, value of the firm (V) will be

    number of share (n) multiplied by the price of each share (Po). Symbolically:

    !

    If the firm issues m number of share to raise funds at the end of year 1 so as to finance

    investment and at price P1, value of the firm at time o will be :

    !

    Thus, the total value of the firm as per equation (3) is equal to the capitalized value of

    the dividends to be received during the period, plus the value of the number of share

    outstanding at the end of the period, less the value of the newly issued shares.

    A firm can finance its investment programme either by ploughing back of its earnings

    or by issue of new share or by both. Thus, total amount of new share that the firm will

    issue to finance its investment will be :

    mP1 = I1 (X1 - nD1)

    Where,

    ! 25

  • mP1 = Total amount of funds raised by issue of new share to finance investment

    projects.

    I1 = Total amount of investment during first period

    X1 = Total amount of net profit during first period

    Criticism of MM Approach

    MM hypothesis has been criticised on account of various unrealistic assumptions as

    given below.

    1. Perfect capital market does not exist in reality.

    2. Information about the company is not available to all the persons.

    3. The firms have to incur flotation costs while issuing securities.

    4. Taxes do exit and there is normally different tax treatment for dividends and capital

    gain.

    5. The firms do not follow a rigid investment policy.

    6. The investors have to pay brokerage, fees etc., while doing any transaction.

    7. Shareholders may prefer current income as compared to further gains.

    Illustration: Agile Ltd. belongs to a risk class of which the appropriate capitalisation

    rate is

    10%. It currently has 1,00,000 shares selling at Rs. 100 each. The firm is

    contemplating declaration of a dividend of Rs.6 per share at the end of the current

    fiscal year which has just begun. Answer the following questions based on Modigliani

    and Miller Model and assumption of no taxes:

    (i) What will be the price of the shares at the end of the year if a diviend is not

    declared?

    (ii) What will be the price if dividend is declared?

    ! 26

  • (iii) Assuming that the firm pays dividend, has net income of Rs. 10 lakh and new

    investments of Rs. 20 lakhs during the period, how many new shares must be issued?

    !Solution:

    Modigliani and Miller - Dividend Irrelevancy Model

    !

    !

    100 1.10 = P1 + 6

    110 = P1 + 6

    P1 = 110 - 6

    P1 = Rs. 104

    ! 27

  • !(ii) Calculation of No. of Shares to be issued

    !Alternatively, the number of new shares to be issued is calculated as follows :

    !

    Where,

    n = Number of Shares outstanding at the beginning of the period i.e., 1,00,000 shares

    N = Change in the number of Shares outstanding during the period (to be

    ascertained)

    I = Total investment required for capital budget i.e., Rs. 20,00,000

    E = Earning of the firm during the period after payment of dividend.

    If dividend declared =10,00,000 - 6,00,000 = Rs. 4,00,000

    If no dividend declared = 10,00,000

    Now we can calculate the number of new shares to be issued :

    (I) If dividend declared:

    !

    Particulars Dividend Declared

    Dividend not declared

    Net Income Less: Dividend Paid Retained Earning New investment Amount to be raised by new issue (A) Market Price per share (B) New shares to be issued (A / B)

    10,00,000 6,00,000

    10,00,000

    4,00,000 10,00,000

    16,00,000 10,00,000

    104 110

    15,385 9,091

    ! 28

  • (II) If no dividend declared :

    !

    MM Dividend irrelevance theory

    !

    Therefore, whether dividends are paid or not, value of the firm remains the same as

    per M.M. approach.

    !TYPES OF DIVIDEND POLICY:

    The various types of dividend policies are discussed as follows:

    1. Regular Dividend Policy

    Payment of dividend at the usual rate is termed as regular dividend. The investors

    such as retired persons, widows and other economically weaker persons prefer to get

    regular dividends.

    A regular dividend policy offers the following advantages.

    a. It establishes a profitable record of the company.

    b. It creates confidence amongst the shareholders.

    c. It aids in long-term financing and renders financing easier.

    d. It stabilizes the market value of shares.

    Particulars Dividend Declared

    Dividend not declared

    Existing shares New shares issued Total No. of shares at the end Market price per share Total market value of shares at the year end

    1,00,000 15,385

    1,00,000 9,091

    1,15,385 1,09,091

    104 110

    1,20,00,000 1,20,00,000

    ! 29

  • e. The ordinary shareholders view dividends as a source of funds to meet their day-

    today living expenses.

    f. If profits are not distributed regularly and are retained, the shareholders may have to

    pay a higher rate of tax in the year when accumulated profits are distributed.

    However, it must be remembered that regular dividends can be maintained only by

    companies of long standing and stable earnings. A company should establish the

    regular dividend at a lower rate as compared to the average earnings of the company.

    2. Stable Dividend Policy

    Under this policy, stable or almost stable rate of dividend is maintained.

    Company maintains reserves in the years of prosperity and uses them in paying

    dividend in lean years. If company follows stable dividend policy, the market price

    of its shares shall be higher. 'There are several reasons why investors prefer

    stable dividend policy. Main reasons are

    (a) Confidence among Shareholders: A regular and stable dividend payment

    may serve to resolve uncertainty in the minds of shareholders. There are 'many resorts

    not to cut the dividend rate even if its profits are declining, it maintains the -rate of

    dividend by appropriating its reserves. Stable dividend presents a good

    image of the company and thus gains the confidence of the shareholders and the

    goodwill of the company increases in the eyes of the investors

    (b) Income Conscious Investors: The second factor favoring stable dividend

    policy is that some investors are income conscious and favor a stable rate of

    dividend. They, too, never favor an unstable rate of dividend. A stable

    dividend policy may also satisfy such investors.

    ! 30

  • (c) Stability in Market Price of Shares: Other things being equal, the market

    price vary with the rate of dividend the company declares on its equity shares.

    The value of shares of a company 'laving a stable dividend policy fluctuates

    not widely even if the earnings of the company is lower than the previous year.

    Thus, this policy buffers the market price of the stock.

    (d) Encouragement to Institutional Investors: A stable dividend policy attracts

    investments from institutional investors. Such institutional investor generally

    prepare a list of securities, mainly incorporating the securities of the companies

    having stable dividend policy in which they invest their surpluses or their long-

    term funds such as pensions or provident funds etc.

    In this way, stability and regularity of dividends not only affects

    the market price of shares but also increases the general credit of the

    company that benefits the company in the long run. The company with stable

    dividend policy can formulate its financial planning very easily because the

    financial manager can correctly estimate the future demand and supply of

    capital in the firth. Timing of dividend payment can also be forecasted

    easily by preparing cash flow statement.

    !Stability of dividends can taken three distinct forms:

    !(a) Constant dividend per share: Under this policy, the management follows the policy

    of paying a fixed amount of dividend per share every year irrespective of the

    fluctuations in the earnings. It does not imply that the rate of dividend will never

    ! 31

  • be increased. When the earnings of the company increase at a new level and the

    management is of the view that it can easily .maintain that level of earnings, it

    increases the rate of dividend per share. The policy is easy to follow when company

    earnings are stable. lf earnings fluctuate widely, the company can policy by

    maintaining a dividend fluctuation fund in surplus years.

    !

    (b) Constant payout ratio: Some companies follow the policy of paying a fixed per cent

    or net profits as dividend every year, i e., policy of constant' payout ratio.

    Suppose, a

    company adopts a 40 per cent payout ratio, it means, 40 per cent net earnings of

    the company will be paid-out to shareholders every year as dividend. In the year of

    loss, no dividend is paid. Internal financing under this policy is automatic. For

    example, in the above case, 60% of the profits are transferred to reserves. Thus the

    policy leaves nothing to the management discretion.

    ! 32

  • !

    (c) Stable rupee dividend plus extra dividend: Some companies follow a policy of

    paying constant low dividend per share plus an extra dividend in the years of high

    profits.

    Such a policy is most suitable to the firm having fluctuating earnings from year to

    year.

    Dangers of Stable Dividend Policy

    In spite of many advantages, the stable dividend policy suffers from certain

    limitations. Once a stable dividend policy is followed by a company, it is not easier to

    change it. If the stable dividends are not paid to the shareholders on any account

    including insufficient profits, the financial standing of the company in the minds of

    the investors is damaged and they may like to dispose off their holdings. It adversely

    affects the market price of shares of the company.

    And if the company pays stable dividends in spite of its incapacity, it will be suicidal

    in the long-run.

    !3. Irregular Dividend Policy

    ! 33

  • Some companies follow irregular dividend payments on account of the following:

    a. Uncertainty of earnings.

    b. Unsuccessful business operations.

    c. Lack of liquid resources.

    d. Fear of adverse effects of regular dividends on the financial standing of the

    company.

    !4. No Dividend Policy

    A company may follow a policy of paying no dividends presently because of its

    unfavourable working capital position or on account of requirements of funds for

    future expansion and growth.

    !5. Residual Dividend Policy

    When new equity is raised floatation costs are involved. This makes new equity

    costlier than retained earnings. Under the Residual approach, dividends are paid out

    of profits after making provision for money required to meet upcoming capital

    expenditure commitments.

    !STABILITY OF DIVIDEND:

    Another important dimension of a dividend policy is the stability of dividends i.e.

    how stable, regular or steady should the dividend stream be, over time? It is generally

    said that the shareholders favour stable dividends and those dividends, which have

    prospects of steady upward growth. If a firm develops such a pattern of paying stable

    and steady dividends, then the investors/shareholders may be willing to pay a higher

    ! 34

  • price for the shares. So while designing a dividend policy for the firm, it is also to be

    considered as to whether the firm will have a consistency in dividend payments or the

    dividends will fluctuate from one year to another. In the long run, every firm will like

    to have a consistent dividend policy, yet fluctuations from one year to another may be

    unfavourable.

    Rationale for stability of dividend

    Most of the firms follow stable dividends or gradually increasing dividends due to

    following reasons

    a. Many investors consider dividends as a part of regular income to meet their

    expenses.

    Hence, they prefer a predictable pattern of dividends rather than fluctuating pattern.

    A fall in the dividend income may lead to sale of some shares. On the other hand

    when the dividend income increases, an investor may invest some of the proceeds as

    reinvestment in shares. Both the cases involve transaction cost and inconvenience for

    investor. Hence, they prefer regular dividends.

    b. The dividend policy of firms conveys a lot to the investors. Increasing dividends

    means better prospects of the company. On the contrary, decreasing dividends suggest

    bad earnings expectations. In addition, stable dividends are sings of stable earnings of

    the company. On the other hand, varying dividends lead to uncertainty in the mind of

    shareholders.

    c. Certain investors mainly institutional, consider the stability of dividends as an

    important criterion before they decide on the investment in that particular firm.

    !

    ! 35

  • Illustration 1

    A company has following capital :

    7% Preference Shares of Rs. 100 each 6,00,000

    Ordinary Shares of Rs. 10 each 16,00,000

    22,00,000

    The following information are available relating to its financial year ending

    31-12-2008:

    i) Profit, after taxation @ 40%, Rs. 5,42,000

    ii) Ordinary dividend paid 20%.

    iii) Depreciation Rs. 1,20,000

    iv) Market price of Ordinary Shares Rs. 40

    v) Capital Commitment Rs. 2,40,000.

    You are required to calculate the following:

    a) The dividend yield on the Ordinary Shares.

    b) The cover for the preference and Ordinary dividends.

    c) The earnings yield,

    d) The price - earnings ratio,

    e) The Net Cash Flow,

    f) The reason for the comparison of net cash flow with capital commitment.

    Solution:

    a) Dividend yield on ordinary shares (or) dividend yield ratio

    = (DPS / market price) 100

    = (10 20% /40) 100

    = 5%

    ! 36

  • [Market price = Capitalized value of dividend]

    b) Dividend coverage ratio:

    Preference = (PAT / Preference dividend)

    = 542000 / 42000

    = 12.9 times

    Equity = (PAT Preference dividend) / equity dividend

    = 500000 / 320000

    = 1.5625 times

    c) Earnings yield ratio = (EPS / market price ) x 100

    = (3.125 / 40) x 100

    = 7.8125 %

    [EPS = 500000 / 160000 = Rs 3.125]

    d) Price Earning Ratio = [(40 / 3.125)] = 12.8 times

    (Market price / EPS)

    e) Net cash flow Rs

    PAT 542000

    (+) depreciation 120000

    662000

    (-) preference dividend 42000

    (-) equity dividend 320000

    Net cash flow 300000

    f) Since the cash flow position shows the firms ability to meet the capital expenditure

    / Capital commitment.

    !! 37

  • Illustration 2: ABC Ltd. has a capital of Rs.10 lakhs in equity shares of Rs.100 each.

    The shares currently quoted at par. The company proposes declaration of a dividend

    of Rs.10 per share at the end of the current financial year. The capitalisation rate for

    the risk class to which the company belongs is 12%.

    What will be the market price of the share at the end of the year, if

    i) A dividend is not declared?

    ii) A dividend is declared?

    iii) Assuming that the company pays the dividend and has net profits of Rs.5,00,000

    and makes new investments of Rs.10 lakhs during the period, how many new shares

    must be issued? Use the M.M. model.

    !Solution:

    Modigliani Miller Approach

    n = no of shares = 10000

    P0 = market price = Rs100

    D1 = Expected dividend = Rs10

    Ke = cost of capital = 12%

    i. Market price of share ( P1) if dividend not declared

    Given D1 = 0

    We know,

    P0 = (D1+P1)/ (1+Ke)

    P1 = 112

    ii. P1 if dividend declared

    D1 = Rs10

    ! 38

  • P0 = (D1+P1) / (1+ Ke )

    P1 = Rs.102

    iii. No of shares to be issued :

    n = (I E + n D1 )/ P1

    = (1000000 500000 + 100000) / 102

    = 5882 shares

    !Illustration 3

    A textile company belongs to a risk-class for which the appropriate PE ratio is 10. It

    currently has 50,000 outstanding shares selling at Rs.100 each. The firm is

    contemplating the declaration of Rs.8 dividend at the end of the current fiscal year

    which has just started. Given the assumption of MM, answer the following questions:

    i) What will be the price of the share at the end of the year: (a) if a dividend is not

    declared, (b) if it is declared?

    ii) Assuming that the firm pays the dividend and has a net income of Rs.5,00,000 and

    makes new investments of Rs.10,00,000 during the period, how many new shares

    must be issued?

    iii) What would be the current value of the firm: (a) if a dividend is declared, (b) if a

    dividend is not declared?

    !Solution:

    Given,

    P/E ratio = 10

    n = 50,000shares

    ! 39

  • P0 = Rs. 100

    D1 = Rs. 8

    E = Rs. 5,00,000

    I = Rs. 10,00,000

    Ke = 1 / (P/E ratio)

    1. Calculation of P1

    1. If dividend not declared:

    P0 = (D1+ P1) / (1+Ke)

    P1 = Rs110

    2. if dividend declared:

    P0 = (D1+ P1) / (1+Ke)

    P1 = Rs.102

    3. If the company pay dividend:

    P1 = Rs102

    n = (I E +nD1) / P1

    No of new shares, n = 900000 / 102 = 8823.5294 shares

    4. Value of the firm:

    a) If the company pay dividend:

    V = (n + n) P1 = (58823.5294) 102

    = Rs6000000

    b) If the company does not pay dividend:

    V = (n+n) P1 = 54545.4545 x 110

    = Rs6000000

    Working notes:

    ! 40

  • n = (1000000 - 500000) / 110 = 4545.4545

    !Illustration 4

    (i) From the following information supplied to you, ascertain whether the firms D/P

    ratio is optimal according to Walter. The firm was started a year ago with an equity

    capital of Rs. 20 lakh.

    Earnings of the firm Rs 2,00,000.00

    Dividend paid 1,50,000.00

    P/E ratio 12.50

    Number of shares outstanding, 20,000 @ Rs.100 each. The firm is expected to

    maintain its current rate of earnings on investment.

    ii) What should be the P/E ratio at which the dividend payout ratio will have no effect

    on the value of the share?

    iii) Will your decision change if the P/E ratio is 8, instead of 12.5?

    Solution:

    i. Ke = (EPS / market price) = 1 /(12.5) = 8 %

    r = (200000 / 2000000) x 100 = 10 %

    Payout ratio = (150000/200000) x 100 = 75%

    It is the growth firm (r > Ke), as per WALTERs model the optimum payout ratio is

    Zero.

    So in the given case pay out ratio is not optimum.

    Proof:

    a). Market price at 75% payout ratio

    EPS = Rs10

    ! 41

  • DPS =Rs7.5

    r = 10 % & Ke = 8%

    !

    !b). Market price at zero payout:

    EPS = Rs10

    DPS = Rs0

    r = 10 % & Ke = 8 %

    !

    Therefore Zero Payout is optimum.

    i. The payment of dividend in case of normal firms(r = Ke) has no effect on the

    market value of the share.

    Ke = r = 10%

    P/E ratio = 10times i.e [ 1 / Ke]

    ii. If P/E ratio = 8 , Ke= 12.5 %

    r = 10%

    When r < Ke the firm is Decline firm as per WALTER and its Optimum payout ratio

    is 100%.

    So in the given case it is 75% payout only, it is not optimum payout.

    !! 42

  • Proof:

    Market price at 75% payout:

    !

    100% payout

    !

    !Illustration 5

    Excellence Ltd registered earnings of Rs. 800,000 for the year ended 31st March.

    They finance all investments out of retained earnings. The opportunities for

    investments are many. If such opportunities are not availed their earnings will stay

    perpetually at Rs. 800,000. Following figures are relevant.

    !

    The returns to shareholders are expected to rise if the earnings are retained because of

    the risk attached to new investments. As for the current year, dividend payments will

    be made with or without retained earnings. What according to you, should be

    retained?

    !Solution:

    !

    ! 43

  • Evaluation of different dividend policies:

    !

    !From the above policies, policy B gives more value to the share holders. Hence it is

    advisable to adopt the policy B.

    Illustration 6

    X Ltd. has 1000 shares of Rs 10 each raised at a premium of Rs. 15 per share. The

    companys retained earnings are Rs. 552500. The Companys stock sells for Rs. 20

    per share.

    a. If a 10% stock dividend is declared how many new shares would be issued?

    b. What would be the market price after the stock dividend?

    c. How would the equity account change?

    d. If a 25% stock dividend is declared what changes will take place?

    e. If the company instead declares a 5:1 stock split, how many shares will be

    outstanding?

    What would be the new par value? What would be the new market price?

    ! 44

  • f. If the company declares a 1:4 reverse split, how many shares will be outstanding?

    What would be the new par value? What would be the new market price?

    g. If the company declares a dividend of Rs. 2 per share and the stock goes ex

    dividend tomorrow, what will be the price at which it will sell?

    !Solution:

    a) If 10% stock dividend declared:

    No of new shares issued as bonus = 100

    b) Market price after bonus issue = [(1000 x 20) + (100 x 0 )] / 1100

    = Rs.18.18

    c) Change in equity account

    Equity share capital increased by Rs1000

    Reserves decreased by Rs1000.

    Hence, there is no change in the Net Equity

    d) If 25% stock dividend declared

    1) No. of new shares issued = 1000 @ 25 % = 250 shares

    2) Market price after stock dividend = [(1000 x 20) + (250 x 0)] / 1250

    = Rs.16

    3) Change in EQUITY account:

    Capital increased by Rs. 2500

    Reserve decreased Rs.2500

    There is no change in Net Equity.

    e) If the company declares 5 : 1 stock split i.e. 5 shares issued in exchange of 1 share

    each.

    ! 45

  • No of shares outstanding = 5000

    New face value of share = 10/ 5 = Rs.2

    New market price = 20 / 5 = Rs.4

    f) If the company declares 1: 4 reverse split i.e 1 share issued in exchange of every 4

    shares.

    No of shares outstanding = 250

    New face value = 4 x 10 = Rs.40

    Market price = 20 x 4 = Rs.80

    g) Cum dividend market price = Rs. 20

    (-) dividend = 2

    Ex-dividend market price Rs. 18

    Illustration 7

    Following is the capital structure of Progressive Co. Ltd. as on 31st March, 2009.

    Rs.

    Equity Share Capital (1,00,000 shares of Rs. 10 each) 10,00,000

    Share premium 15,00,000

    Reserves & Surpluses 5,00,000

    Net worth 30,00,000

    On 1st April, 2007, the company made a bonus issue of two shares for every five held.

    The market price at the time of bonus issue was Rs. 40 per share. X holds 100 shares

    of the Progressive Co. Ltd. purchased on 1st April, 2003 a market price of Rs. 30. He

    sold these shares on 31st March, 2009 at Rs. 50 per share. The income tax rate for X

    is 20% and capital gain tax is 15% for him. If the company pays a regular dividend of

    10% on par before transferring earnings to reserves and surpluses, state whether X

    ! 46

  • was able to earn his required rate of return of 10% on his investment? (The PV at 10%

    1st year 0.91; 2nd year 0.83; 3rd year 0.75; 4th year 0.68; 5th year 0.62 and 6th year

    0.56)

    Solution:

    Appraisal of Investment decision: [NPV method ]

    1) Initial Investment (out flow): 100 shares @ 30 each = 3000

    2) Present value recurring cash inflows

    !

    !3) Present value of terminal cash inflow:

    Sale proceeds 140shares @ 50 each = 7000

    (-) capital gain tax 4000@ 15% = 600

    6400

    Its present value = 6400 x 0.56 = 3584

    4) NET PRESENT VALUE:

    Present value of cash inflow (407.52+3584) = 3,991.52

    (-) outflow 3,000

    Net present value 991.52

    The investment yields more than 10 % return to the investor.

    ! 47