Upload
dwight-webster
View
219
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
Open Mentor: Supporting tutors with their feedback to students
Denise WhitelockOpen University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes
[email protected] Watt
The School of Computing, The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
Formative feedback for tutors: OpenMentor – a training and monitoring e-Tool?
• What implicit /explicit models do tutors have about marking assignments?
• What training is given to tutors about marking assignments?
• Do we hold the company line when marking?
• Tutor questionnaire
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
What is Open Mentor?
“An open source mentoring tool for tutors”
“Open source” = free and easy to use, and to embed in an institutions infrastructure and working practices
“mentoring” = designed to help people learn how to give feedback effectively, through reflection and social networks
“tutors” = primarily intended for teaching staff, but with clear applications for those involved in quality
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
Coding into Categories
• Bales analysis
• Psychology 1950s
• Analyses talk
• Includes socio-emotive categories
• Flander’s (1970)categories inappropriate as also includes classroom control
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
Bales Categories
• Four main groupings
• A. Positive reactions; agreeing and boosting the other person
• B. Directing/teaching
• C. Questions: requesting information, clarification etc
• D. Negative reactions: disagreement
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
Coding the comments
Categories Specific Examples
Positive Reactions
A1
A2
A3
1. Shows solidarity
2. Shows tension release
3. Shows agreement
Jokes, gives help, rewards others
Laughs, shows satisfaction
Understands, concurs, complies, passively accepts
Attempted Answers
B1
B2
B3
4. Gives suggestion
5. Gives opinion
6. Gives information
Directs, proposes, controls
Evaluates, analyses, expresses feelings or wishes
Orients, repeats, clarifies, confirms
Questions
C1
C2
C3
7. Asks for information
8. Asks for opinion
9. Asks for suggestion
Requests orientation, repetition, confirmation, clarification
Requests evaluation, analysis, expression of feeling orwishes
Requests directions, proposals
Negative Reactions
D1
D2
D3
10. Shows disagreement
11. Shows tension
12. Shows antagonism
Passively rejects, resorts to formality, withholds help
Asks for help, withdraws
Deflates others, defends or asserts self
Bales’ Interaction Process
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
Identifying trends: H801
0 5 10 15 20 25
A Pass 1
A Pass 2
A Pass 3
A Pass 4
B Pass 1
B Pass 2
B Pass 3
B Pass 4
C Pass 1
C Pass 2
C Pass 3
C Pass 4
D Pass 1
D Pass 2
D Pass 3
D Pass 4
Ba
les'
In
tera
cti
on
al
Ca
teg
ori
es
at
ea
ch
Pa
ssL
leve
l
Number ofIincidences
Graph to show conflated Bale’s categories against mean number of incidences in H801 scripts
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
Identifying trends: H801
5.96
17.13
5.73
1.61
A
B
C
D
Pie Chart to show the mean number of incidences per pass per conflated Bales' Interactional Category for all four levels of pass in H801 scripts
Key:
A = Positive reactions
B = Responses
C = Questions
D = Negative reactions
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
How general is the model?
• S103 – Foundation Science Course
• B820 – Masters Business School Course
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
Identifying trends
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
Pie Charts to show the mean number of incidences per conflated Bales Interactional Category for ‘Pass 1’ and ‘Pass 4’ in the following courses:
Key:
A = Positive reactions C = Questions B = Responses D = Negative reactions
Pass 4
Pass 1
B820 S103
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
A
B
C
D
H801
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
Explaining Open Mentor’s Rules
• Four categories
• A – Positive Reactions
• B – Attempted Answers
• C – Questions
• D – Negative Reactions
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
‘A’ - Positive Reactions
Category Examples of Rules Examples of commentsA - Positive Reactions1. Shows solidarity A1 ...excellent... Excellent Conclusions.
A1 ...(good|comprehensive)... Good, you are drawing on hard facts here.A1 ...nicely... Very nicely stated. Your analysis is thorough and your
conclusions consistent regarding the attractiveness of the budget airline sector. This is a good example of critical thinking.
A1 ...well presented... Very well presented diagram with interesting information.A1 ...effective use... Effective use of the case material here.A1 …well (structured|stated)… Report very well structured.A1 ...(well|clear)(ly)*
(structured|structure|summary| summarised|presented|presentation)...
The corporate vs. business unit strategy is well presented and nicely tied to strategies.
A1 ...reasonable.... A reasonable structure as listed in your table of contents.A1 ...useful point(s)... Generally useful points in this section.
2. Shows tension release A2 ... a helpful...
A2 …(thanks|thank you)…3. Shows agreement A3 ...yes... Yes, the intellectual reactions are both real.
A3 ...indeed... Indeed – if it has one basic strategy it is surely differentiation, though it still has to control costs.
4. Praise then direction A4 good...but... Good model, good quote, but be careful about what industry you analyse ??
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
‘B’ Attempted Answers
Category Rules Examples of commentsB - Attempted Answers
B4 …perhaps… Perhaps even better here to explain the link in your mind between "analysis of stratgeies" and "strategic issues".
B4 …requires…B4 …take care… Take care with your STEP analysis not to make it too industry
focussed.B4 …useful to… Innovation is closely linked to structure and culture- it would be
useful to see some book 6-8 concepts here too.
B4 …you (might|ought)… You ought to have explicitly stated these.
B4 Don’t|never … Don’t introduce new frameworks just for the sake of it in the conclusion. The conclusion should be pulling together what went before.
B4 Please (see|refer to|look at)... Please make sure to read and understand the question correctly
5. Gives opinion B5 I (am|think)... I think I can see where you are going, though a numbered report format might have demonstrated the approach better
B5 This is.... this is an introduction rather than a “summary”B5 ...sounds...like... This sounds as if it could be very popular!!B5 ...not sure... I am not sure about the balance between the environmental
analysis and the review of the resources, capabilities (power, culture, structures and systems) as raised in the question.
B5 I (thought|agree|suggest)… I thought it was because they did not need any external input and saw a significant market sector they could address themselves.
B5 I (do|don’t) think… I don’t think this exercise has helped to develop your analysis. I also think that the development of the perspectives is superficial
6. Gives information B6 …(demonstrates|shows) this….B6 Also… Also, cross link to Leadership issues, Pettigrew on Strategic
Thinking tooB6 ...Q1... etc Q1 = 59/100
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
‘C’ Questions
Category Rules Examples of commentsC - Questions7. Asks for information C7 ...?... Is a reference and date needed here for the fit quote?
C7 Why... why is this a useful model to use?C7 (What|where|how|can)… How might you define the boundaries of the airline industry –
passenger carriers only ? charter, scheduled, no frills ? European or global ?
C7 In what…. What has caused this break? Has something changed in the environment?
C7 And where... Where does the radar data come from?8. Asks for opinion C8 what conclusions... What conclusions do you draw from using the model? Is the
industry attractive?
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
‘D’ Negative reactions
Category Rules Examples of commentsD - Negative Reactions
10. Shows disagreement D10 ...no... I've read no justification for this output!!!
D10 ...not the (point|question)... A bit of an esoteric argument about what strategy means - that is not the question posed in Part B
D10 …says nothing… This sentence says nothing.D10 …not clear… It is not clear how success factors equate to attractiveness. You
need to show the link more clearlyD10 …missed the point… You have somewhat missed the point of STEP analysis here –
STEP is about the macro issues, ie those that affect all businesses in all industries not just those relevant to this industry.
D10 …very shallow… Very shallow.D10 I disagree… I disagree. Analysis of the copier market as it then was showed a
monopoly player earning excess economic rent.
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
Example Rules
• ...you could... (B4)
• ...good...but... (B4)
• ...excellent analysis... (A1)
• ...this...does not.... (D10)
• ...what are... (C7)
• ...in my opinion... (B5)
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
Building the rule set
Comments Classified from Training Data
0102030405060708090
100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Training Iteration
% o
f co
mm
ents
cla
ssif
ied
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
Is the rule set generic?
Comments Classified from Test Data
0102030405060708090
100
B820 TestSet 1
B820 TestSet 2
B820 TestSet 3
A850 M878 S809
Test Data Set
% o
f co
mm
ents
cla
ssif
ied
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
Is this a model that works in the way tutors and students expect?
47 students and 44 tutors responded to a questionnaire to test OM’s underlying tutorial model
Findings suggest:
Lower grades should attract more detailed comments and explanation by the tutor (students)
Higher grades should attract more positive comments (students and tutors)
Lower grades attract more questions and suggestions (tutors)
Model supported by pedagogical study
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
How Open Mentor handles comments
“Good work”
“Yes, well done”
“Yes, but is this useful?”
“Can you explain what you mean”
“This does not follow”
A = positive reactions
A = positive reactions
B = attempted answers, and not a positive reaction
C = questions
D = negative reactions
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
Open Mentor in action
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
Inside Open Mentor
Course info
Assess-ments
ClassifierExtractor
AnalyserWeb
interface
Bench-marks
DMW 2007 The Open University's Institute for Educational Technology
Current and future developments Embedding in institutional practice
Enhancing quality of first year provision
Links to VLEs and information systems
Further development
Support for students
Course evaluation
Open Comment
Ensuring emotional support as well as conceptual guidance for learners