Upload
plinio-santos
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DocumentNo.6
Mr.TeltschiksMemorandumforChancellorKohl
Bonn,December6,1989
Re:TheSovietUnionandtheGermanQuestion
IamforwardingtheattachedofficialaswellasunofficialconsiderationsthroughtheconfidentialchannelthatYouandGeneralSecretaryGorbachevagreeduponbeforehand.1Thebearertoldmeexplicitlythattheofficialpositioncontainedtheconsiderationsofthehighestcircles(GeneralSecretaryGorbachev);theunofficialdeliberationsareideasthatwerediscussedintheInternationalDepartmentoftheCentralCommittee(PolitburomemberYakovlev).
Numbers1through7showthatsignificantconsiderationsinyour10PointPlanforDeutschlandpolitikgobacktoSovietleadership.
TheunofficialsecondpartdocumentsthattheSovietleadershipisseriouslydiscussingthevariouspossibilitiesofthereunificationissue.Your10PointPlanpreventstheworldpublicfromfacingtheGermanquestionwithSovietproposals,withoutbeingawareoftheFederalGovernmentsposition.
Vote:
ThepointscoveredinPartIIshouldbediscussedassoonaspossibleintheGermanyCircle[Deutschlandkreis]convenedbyMinisterSeiters.ThroughconfidentialchannelsGeneralSecretaryGorbachevshouldbeofferedtospeakwithyou.AtthistalkyoushouldbeinthepositiontodiscusstheaddressedtopicswiththeSovietside.
Teltschik
SovietUnionandtheGermanQuestion
I. OfficialPosition
1. TheSovietleadershiphasabasicallypositiveattitudetowardsthedevelopmentsintheGDR.
1Portugalov,ananalystintheCCCPSUInternationalDepartment,gavethedocumenttoMr.TeltschikonthemorningofNovember21,1989.DuringtheconversationTeltschikinitiatedameetingbetweenChancellorKohlandGeneralSecretaryGorbachev.ImmediatelyafterwardheinformedKohl.IfGorbachevandhisadvisersarealreadydiscussingthepossibilityofreunificationandtherelatedquestionsitishightimeforDeutschlandpolitiktogoontheoffensive.Kohlwasalreadyonthewaytothenextmeetingbutwantedtospeakaboutitindetailassoonaspossible.TheChancelloralsoconsidereditnecessarytomeetwithGorbachevinpersonsoon.(Teltschik,329Tage,4245).
2. NointerferenceintheGDRsaffairs,butdevelopmentswithouttheSovietUnion,letaloneagainstit,wouldhavebeeninconceivable.
Fromthebeginning,theSovietUnionknewwhatconsequencesitsownreformpoliticswouldhaveintheGDR.
3. IntheSovietUnion,structuraltransformationinallareas(political,economic,thenationalitiessphere)isstillinthebeginningstages.ItisevenmoresointheGDR.
However,contrarytotheUSSR,thedevelopment,qualityandspeedofthetransformationintheGDRcruciallydependsonthepoliciesoftheFederalGovernment.
4. Politicalslogansmaysoundsensible,forexampletheprecedenceofthecommonEuropeanorderforlastingpeaceoverthesolutionoftheGermanquestion,orthesolutionoftheGermanquestionexclusivelyunderaEuropeanroof.Buttheycouldalsoprovetobeemptyformulasor,whichwouldbeworse,theycouldcontradictrealisticpolicies.
TheSovietUnionisconcernedthatthedevelopmentofGermanGermanrelationscangoinanundesirableanddangerousdirectionduringthedecidingphaseoftheselandmarkmomentsonthesamegroundsasalways.
5. ThedevelopmentsintheGDRshouldremaininaccordwiththespiritandtheletterofthejointGermanSovietdeclarationfromJune12,1989.ThisconcernsaboveallthingstherecognitionoftheexistingEuropeanpostwarstructuresasthebasisfornewdevelopmentsfortheforeseeablefuture.
FortheSovietUnionthismeansthattheconstructionofacommonEuropeanorderforlastingpeacehastohavepriorityoverthesolutionoftheGermanquestion,i.e.beforefiguringouttheformoftheGermansfuturenationalandstateexistence.ThecommonEuropeanorderforpeacehastobeacceptedasanindispensableconditionforthesolutionoftheGermanquestion.
6. Thestrict,unlimitedandabsoluteadherencetotheMoscowandWarsawAgreements,includingtheBasicTreatywiththeGDR,mustbethematterofcourseuntilthenewEuropeanpeaceorderandstabilityaresecurelyinplace.
7. TodaythereisanewsituationintheGDR.AtthispointitwouldbesuitabletofindanewModusvivendionthebasisoftheBasicTreatywiththeGDR.
PrimeMinisterModrowsproposalofthewiderangingcooperationtreaty[Vertragsgemeinschaft]shouldmakeitpossibletohandletheFRGsexclusivemandate[Alleinvertretungsanspruch]restrictivelyandpragmatically.OtherwisetheGDRsExistencewouldobjectivelybethreatened.
II. UnofficialConsiderations
ThehourhascometofreetherelationshipbetweentheGDRandtheFRGfromrelicsofthepast.
1. TheGDRisdependentoneconomiccooperation.PreconditionsshouldnotleadtotherenunciationanddestabilizationoftheGDR.TheFederalGovernmentshouldbegenerousandhavepatience.
2. InthesphereofdisarmamentadditionalgreatpossibilitiesareopeningupforbothStatesoftheGermanNation.ItisnowcompletelyuptotheFederalGovernmenthowquicklyandcomprehensivelyprogresscanbeachievedonthedisarmamentissuesintheinterestsofbothGermanstates.
3. ItistheSovietUnionsdesireandrequestthatthelongtermsolutiontotheGermanQuestionnotbetiedupindailypoliticsortheelectioncampaign.
4. Apurelytheoreticalquestion:iftheFederalGovernmentintendstointroducethequestionofthereunificationand/ornewunificationtopracticalpolicythenitwouldbereasonabletoopenlyconsiderthefutureallianceaffiliationofbothGermanstatesandthewithdrawalclauseoftheParisTreaties2andtheRomeTreatiesinthecaseofreunification.3
5. Theoretically,iftheGDRweretobequicklyintegratedintotheEuropeanCommunity,shouldtheSovietUnionthensitatthesidetableandcarryouttheirbusinesswiththeGDRthroughBrussels,payingEuropeantaxesandrenouncingtheircurrentmost
2ThroughtheProtocolforamendingandaddingtotheTreatyofBrussels,signedonOctober23,1954,inParis(withadditionsandcorrespondencein:UNTS.Vol.211,342349,350387;BGBI.1955II,258261,262282),theFederalRepublicandItalyenteredintotheTreaty(Treatyoncooperationineconomic,socialandculturalaffairsandforcollectiveselfdefense,signedonMarch17,1948inBrussels,in:UNTS.Vol.19,5163),thatwouldberedefinedintheWestEuropeanUnion;accordingtoArticleXIIoftheTreatyofBrusselsanexitispossibleaftertheexpirationoffifteenyears.AtthesametimetheforeignministerofNATOStatesdecidedinParistoinvitetheFRGtojoinNATO(ProtocolfromOctober23,1954,ibidemVol.243,308313).Accordingtoarticle12oftheNorthAtlanticTreatyfromApril4,1949(asamendedintheprotocolfromOctober17,1951:ibidemVol.34,243255andVol.126,352;BGBI.1955II,289294)eachpartycanlettheTreatybephasedoutafteraperiodof20years.
3Accordingtoarticle240,theAgreementtofoundtheEuropeanEconomicCommunity,signedonMarch25,1957inRome(withadditionsin:BGBI.1957II,766963,here900)wasvalidforunlimitedtime.TheGermandelegationattheintergovernmentalconferenceforthejointmarketandtheEuropeanAtomicEnergyCommunity[Euratom]statedonFebruary28,1957toacommitteeofdelegationleaderstheacknowledgementthattheleadershipoftheGDRstemsfromthepremisethatthefoundingagreementoftheEuropeanEconomicCommunityandtheEuropeanAtomicEnergyCommunitywouldberevisedincaseofGermanreunification(draftofaprotocolfromameetingonFebruary28andMarch1,2and3,1957inBrussels,Ch.Del.406,MAE777d/57,Mach9,1957;BArchB102/10870.Also:compilationofthedisplayedstatementsfortheEuropeanEconomicCommunityandtheEuropeanAtomicEnergyCommunityAgreement,MAE874d/57andMAE890d/57,March26,1957,ibidem.).
favorednationstatuswiththeGDR?ThisisalsosomethingtheFederalGovernmentshouldthinkabout.
6. TogetherwiththeGermanquestion,theSovietUnionisthinkingaboutallthepossiblealternatives,even,inamannerofspeaking,theunthinkable.TheyknewfromthebeginninghowtobeinvolvedincaseofareformationoftheGDR.Inthiscontext,theUSSRwouldbeinterestedtoknowtheFederalRepublicsattitudetowardsapossiblepeacetreaty.TheFRGcannotrelyonitsalliesinthis,whowouldnotwanttodoawaywiththeOccupationStatute.
7. TheUSSRfollowswithlaughterandtearssomeofthecleverheadsinBonnwhoseeasolutioninafutureGermanConfederationintegratedintotheEuropeanCommunity,therebyembellishingtheallEuropeanintegration.ThisdirectiondoesnotsuittheUSSR.TheFederalGovernmentshouldconsiderthattheSovietUnioncanbaittheWesternAlliesinPariswiththeideaoftwopeacetreaties,onewiththeFRGandonewiththeGDR.InthiscaseyoucanbesurethattheWesternallieswouldcallformorepowerintheFRGthantheUSSRcallsforintheGDR.
8. ThereforeitcanbeassumedthatonthepathofthetwoGermanstatesgrowingclosertogetherthequestionofapeacetreatywillariseverysoon.Itwouldbethereforereasonabletoconfidentiallythinkaboutittogether,possiblyalsotogetherwiththeGDR.
9. Itisconceivablethatintheforeseeablefuture,inthemediumterm,theUSSRcouldgivethegreenlighttoaGermanconfederationoftheusualnature.ThiswouldrequirethattherewouldbenomoreforeignnuclearpresenceonGermansoil.ThiswouldperhapsbetheonlyConditiosinequanonthattheSovietUnioncouldhavetoupholdfuturegoodconductintermsofGermanregulations.
[Source:DokumentezurDeutschlandpolitik:DeutscheEinheit.SondereditionausdenAktendesBundeskanzleramtes1989/90.TranslatedbyAnnaMelyakova.]