Upload
docong
View
216
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Doctoral
& Dissertation
Doctoral Proposal
& Dissertation Guidelines
Revised as of April 28, 2010
Proposal
Guidelines
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 2
Walsh College of Accountancy & Business Administration
3838 Livernois Road
Troy, MI 48007
Walsh College is accredited by the Higher Learning Commission and is a member of the
North Central Association 30 North LaSalle St., Suite 2400, Chicago, IL 60602.
http://www.ncahigherlearningcommission.org
Walsh College is accredited by the International Assembly for Collegiate Business
Education (IACBE). http://www.iacbe.org
Walsh College has a policy of nondiscrimination in admission to, access to, and
employment in its programs and activities. Walsh does not discriminate on the basis of
race, color, sex, age, religion or creed, marital status, handicap or disability, national or
ethnic origin, socioeconomic status, or sexual orientation.
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 3
Table of Contents
Preface 6
Doctoral Proposal and Dissertation Guidelines Organization 6
The Doctoral Candidacy Process 6
The Walsh College Dissertation Proposal Format 7
Section 1: The Walsh College Dissertation 9
Introduction 9
Steps in the Dissertation Process 9
The Walsh College Dissertation Format 10
UMI/ProQuest 12
Printed Copies 12
Special Instructions for Reporting Quantitative Studies 12
Special Instructions for Reporting Qualitative Studies 13
Confidentiality of Sources 13
Integrity and Accuracy 13
Formatting Interview Transcripts 14
Participant/Observer Field Notes 14
Additional Observations 14
Institutional Review Board Policies and Procedures 15
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 4
Policy on Academic Integrity and Plagiarism 15
Section 2: Style at Walsh College 17
The APA Style 17
Font Type and Size 17
Type of Paper, Margins and Justification 17
Spacing 18
Pagination and Sequence of Preliminary Pages 18
Section 3: Preliminary & Subsequent Pages 19
Title Page 19
Abstract 19
Trademark and Copyright Information 19
Copying Test Instruments, Surveys, and Questionnaires 20
Dedication Page 20
Acknowledgements Page 20
Table of Contents 21
List of Tables and List of Figures 21
Definition of Terms & Acronyms 22
Body Text Reference List 22
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 5
Appendices and Exhibits 23
Curriculum Vitae 23
Section 4: Body Text 23
Headings 23
Tables and Figures 24
Formatting Lists in Block Quotes 24
Words Defined and Words Used as Words 24
Verb Tense 25
First Person and Third Person 25
Numbers and Percentages 25
Section 5: Documenting Sources 25
Parenthetical In-Text Citations 25
Electronic Sources 26
Content Footnotes 26
Section 6: Writing Mechanics 26
Inclusive Language 26
Section 7: Examples 28
Sample Title Page 28
Sample Abstract Page 29
Sample Copyright Page 30
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 6
Preface
The Doctoral Research Guidelines is the official style guide for the Doctor of Management
in Executive Leadership dissertation. It is to be used in conjunction with the 6th edition of
the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, hereafter referred to
as APA. The Doctoral Research Guidelines complements the Doctor of Management in
Executive Leadership Program Handbook.
Doctoral Proposal and Dissertation Guidelines Organization
Section I of the Guidelines contains information about the dissertation, which
includes an overview of the fundamental characteristics of a Walsh College of
Accountancy and Business Administration (referred to hereafter as Walsh) dissertation,
and dissertation guidelines that describes the college’s standards for dissertation content.
Form and style guidelines for the proposal and dissertation appear in Section 2. Unless
noted otherwise, references to APA style reflect the sixth edition of the manual. Section 3
provides examples of a title page, copyright page, and abstract page. Section 4 provides
information about the arrangement of the dissertation. Section 5 provides clarification on
documenting sources. Section 6 provides details on writing mechanics. Section 7 gives
examples of dissertation pages.
Doctoral Candidacy Process In order to proceed to the dissertation research and writing phase of the Doctor of
Management in Executive Leadership, the following steps must be completed:
Successful completion of all DMEL coursework;
Successful completion of qualifying examination #3;
Successful completion of the oral examination;
An acceptable dissertation proposal signed off by your dissertation committee.
The Oral Examination will be a defense of the Dissertation Proposal and will be
conducted by the student’s Dissertation Committee. One additional faculty member,
selected by the Chairperson of the student’s Dissertation Committee and who is not
already a member of the student’s Dissertation Committee will participate in the oral
examination. The expected outcome of the Oral Examination is Committee approval of
the Dissertation Proposal.
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 7
The Walsh College Dissertation Proposal Format
Title Page
Abstract
Table of Contents
List of Tables
Chapter I: Significance and Purpose of the Study (Introduction)
� Introduces the Study - Overview
� States the Purpose of the Study (Identification of Researchable
Problem)
� Provides a Rationale of the Study (Stating Significance)
� Formulates Overarching Research Questions or Hypotheses or
Models (Objective(s) of the Study)
� Explains Limitations/Delimitations
� Delineates Related Theories & Theoretical Concepts & Research
� Provides Definitions
Chapter II: Review of Literature (Conceptualization)
• Introduces the Literature in an Overview
• Discusses the Historical Background of the Problem/Opportunity
• Reviews and Analyzes Related Theories and Theoretical Concepts
• Provides analysis and summary of current studies relevant to study
• Summarizes Literature as it relates to study
• Explicates study’s Research Questions or Hypotheses
Chapter III: Methodology (Operationalization)
• Provides Overview of Research Plans
• States appropriateness of methodology (provides rationale for
method over others)
• Explains Planned Research Design and Procedures
o Offers Full Description of Design
o Discusses Strengths/Weaknesses of Study Method
o Site and Participant/Subject Selection, Rationale for Selection o Addresses IRB Concerns and Procedures (Human Subjects
Research Procedures)
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 8
o Explains plans for Data Collection Procedures (Provides
techniques/instruments/protocols)
• Proposed Data Reduction and Analysis techniques
• Ethical Considerations
• Quality Assurance (validity & reliability; trustworthiness criteria)
• Address possible Limitations
• Summarizes Data Management section
References (in proper APA style)
Appendices (Provide supplementary material, such as:)
• Proposed time schedule for executing study, including
o Approximate dates for IRB approval
o Dissertation timeline
o Walsh College program dates & deadlines
o Specified timeframe for data collection and data analysis
o Specified timeframe for drafting and revising chapters
o Approximate date for distributing final draft to committee members
o Approximate date for final oral examination and public dissertation
defense
• Dissertation Chapter Outline
• Institutional Review Board forms (subject consent forms)
• Letters and other relevant documents
• Research instruments (Copies of survey instruments, interview protocols)
• Diagrammatic models of research design, statistical analysis
• Supporting evidence of possible funding sources
• Potential outlets for distributing dissertation findings (specific conferences,
journals, workshops, teaching potential)
• Supplementary annotated bibliography
*DM-EL students should check with their dissertation advisor to tailor the above outline
if necessary.
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 9
Section 1: The Walsh College Dissertation
Introduction
The final phase of your program of study as a Walsh Doctor of Management (DM)
student begins with the preparation of a dissertation proposal, which is affirmed in an
oral proposal defense and then followed by the execution of a research study resulting in
an acceptable doctoral dissertation. Walsh does not specify any particular research
approach or methodology, but does require that the dissertation reflect a high level of
conceptual understanding of your research question(s) and contributes to innovation in
your subject matter. Walsh requires you to demonstrate your knowledge of the subject
and its application, of research design and your ability to interpret research findings both
written and orally.
Steps in the Dissertation Process
• Establish a Dissertation Committee.
• Select, manage and validate a dissertation topic.
• Complete a Dissertation Proposal.
• Secure Institutional Review Board approval for the protection of human
participants in research.
• Conduct the dissertation research.
• Write the dissertation manuscript.
• Review the dissertation manuscript and secure committee approval.
• Submit and publish the dissertation manuscript.
These steps are outlined in greater detail as part in MGT 795 (Proposal and Dissertation Process).
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 10
The Walsh College Dissertation Format
Cover Page
Blank
Abstract
Title Page
Copyright Page (optional)
Dedication Page (optional)
Acknowledgements (optional)
Table of Contents
List of Tables
List of Figures
Definition of terms and acronyms
Chapter I: Significance and Purpose of the Study (Introduction)
� Introduction - Overview
� Purpose of the Study (Problem/Opportunity)
� Significance (Rationale of the Study)
� Objective of the Study (Overarching Research Questions or
Hypotheses)
� Delineation of Theories & Theoretical Concepts (Definitions)
� Limitations/Delimitations
Chapter II: Review of Literature (Conceptualization)
• Overview
• Review (and criticism) of Related Theories and Theoretical Concepts
o Historical background of problem/opportunity
o Analysis and summary of current studies relevant to study
• Summary of Literature as it relates to study
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 11
• Research Questions & Hypotheses
Chapter III: Methodology
• Overview of Research
• Appropriateness of Methodology (rationale for method over others)
• Research Design
o Full Description of Design
o Strengths/Weaknesses of Study Method
o IRB Procedures (Human Subjects Research Procedures)
o Data Collection Procedures
(techniques/instruments/protocols)
o Data Reduction and Analysis
• Summary of Data Management
Chapter IV: Results and Discussion
• Overview
• Results/Findings (Data Interpretation)
Chapter V: Implications and Conclusions
• Overview of Major Findings
• Summary of Major Findings
• Implications (Value to Others)
• Ethical Considerations
• Limitations
• Directions for Future Research
• Concluding Remarks
Appendices
References
Curriculum Vitae
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 12
UMI/ProQuest
UMI/ProQuest (previously University Microfilms) produces microfilms of
dissertations and publishes the abstracts online in its monthly publication, Dissertation
Abstracts International. Walsh plans to participate in the ProQuest Digital Dissertations™
process. You will receive instructions on electronic submission to ProQuest from the DM
Program Director at the proper time. You will need to submit your dissertation to UMI/
ProQuest in order to be validated for graduation.
You may request that UMI/ProQuest file an application for copyright on your
behalf. If you choose to do this option, you must indicate so when completing the
electronic submission form. Fees for abstract publication are included in the Walsh
College graduation fees. You may request bound copies of your dissertation for personal
use from UMI/ProQuest for an additional fee. Publication may take 3 to 6 months.
Printed Copies
Walsh requires an electronic copy as well as 5 paper copies of your dissertation,
and the following guidelines apply to the bound-and-printed dissertation for submission
to UMI/ProQuest. The dissertation must be printed with letter-quality type. All print
must be in black ink and appear on only one side of each page, including appendix
material. Do not use color in any figures or tables. If reprinting material from published
sources, be sure that the copy is clean and sharp, preferably the original or a first-
generation reprint. Except in cases of fair use, permission from the copyright holder to
reproduce such material must be obtained. (See the Trademark and Copyright Information
section for more details). Guidelines for electronic submission to UMI/Proquest will be
provided when a candidate is ready to submit the dissertation
Special Instructions for Reporting Quantitative Studies
Research methods focus on the choice of information and tend to follow two lines
of inquiry: deductive and inductive reasoning. Quantitative methods, those that present
their results in the form of numbers, are typically confirmatory or deductive but can be
exploratory or inductive. Research techniques refer to different ways of gathering,
analyzing, and interpreting information. They include questionnaire design, content
analysis, and statistical analysis of all kinds. Selection of an appropriate method, design
and technique is defensible on an academic basis rather than on a personal preference for
one method over another. DM students should answer the research question(s) in a
manner consistent with the underlying methodological assumptions that provide the best
approximation to valid conclusions. DM students should also consult with their
committee frequently throughout the design phase of the dissertation to develop a study
that is methodologically sound. Quantitative Studies are either experimental or non-
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 13
experimental in nature. Experimental designs fall into categories of true experimental,
quasi-experimental, natural or ex post facto (casual-comparative). Non experimental
designs include surveys, correlational studies, developmental studies or Delphi.
Special Instructions for Reporting Qualitative Studies
If you are undertaking qualitative research, you face the challenge of reporting the
findings in an appropriate way. Guidance and requirements may vary. For example,
some dissertation committees require students to include lengthy portions of interviews,
i.e., the raw data within the dissertation. Others request that interview transcripts appear
in an appendix; still others do not require raw data to be included in the dissertation at
all, but ask that interview notes and tapes be kept in a secure location for later review, if
necessary. You should follow your dissertation committee’s recommendations and
requirements in presenting and analyzing the data, and always keep raw data secured for
5 years. Several common form and style issues related to interviews, participant/observer
notes, and other raw qualitative data to be included in the dissertation bear mentioning.
In some qualitative research studies the conceptual solution to the research problem is
followed by a demonstration of concept by way of a case study, prototype or simulation.
The appropriate way to do this should be determined in collaboration with the
dissertation chair and dissertation committee at the time of designing the research study.
Confidentiality of Sources
Your sources may or may not wish to be identified in a dissertation. You are
obligated to notify participants and managers of research sites that all Walsh dissertations
enter the public arena. How you refer to anonymous locales and participants can vary.
Your reader should know the city or state, or at least the region, where the research took
place. You should introduce the pseudonym for an organization with a sentence such as
the following: To ensure confidentiality, the facility will be referred to as XYZ Automotive
Manufacturer throughout this dissertation.
You may refer to participants who wish to remain anonymous as Participant 1 or
P1, by an initial, by any other logical abbreviation, or by a pseudonym. You should
inform your reader in the narrative if pseudonyms will be used throughout.
Integrity and Accuracy
A predetermined bias leads almost invariably to selective use of quotations. But as
scientists, researchers are obligated to report findings as completely, accurately, and
objectively as possible, lest the integrity of the narrative be compromised. Your reviewers
expect that the speaker’s actual words are reported and portrayed in an honest context,
including judicious use of blatant grammatical errors and vulgar language. Be prepared
to negotiate with the dissertation committee what the word judicious implies. Use an
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 14
ellipse to show that some words have been deleted, or brackets to indicate that words
have been changed or added. If a substantial portion of an interview is deleted or
changed, paraphrase that section of the interview.
Formatting Interview Transcripts
In many qualitative dissertations, portions of interview transcripts appear in the
narrative. While your dissertation committee members will guide your reporting and
analysis of the data, you should remember that an important goal is to help the reviewer
navigate the text. As such, be consistent and try to format the text with the reader in
mind. APA’s 40-word rule may be helpful here: If an interview excerpt is 40 words or longer,
set the transcript off in block form, customarily single spaced. Establishing a consistent pattern
whereby all transcript segments are set off in block form may be helpful.
The dissertation committee may require a listing of all interview dates. Here, too, you
have choices, depending on how the integrity of the transcriptions is established, while
also aiding the reader during what can become a tedious journey. Citing specific dates for
each interview may seem obtrusive. Some authors offer a summary statement in the
narrative such as: Unless otherwise noted, all interviews took place between May 1, 2000 and
May 21, 2000. If complete transcripts are in the appendix, you could list the actual date of
the interview.
Participant/Observer Field Notes
As previously noted, one challenge you may face when using field notes is that the
first person is generally unacceptable in Walsh College dissertations. You and your
committee members should carefully consider this guideline, negotiating between the
needs of you as the writer, of the reader, and of the scholarly community. One method
that has been used successfully is to format first-person field notes in block form, single-
spaced, and thus set them apart from the third-person narrative.
Additional Observations
As is often the case in scholarship, and most forms of writing, you must first weigh
the needs of the audience and publisher with your own needs as an interpreter of
research data. Rules are often obscure or nonspecific for good reason, because no two
situations are alike. Thus, when reporting qualitative research, you should be concerned
less with prescribed rules and more with (a) accuracy and integrity, (b) protection of
confidential sources, and (c) ease of reading.
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 15
Institutional Review Board Policies and Procedures DM students are expected to comply with all provisions of the College’s
Institutional Review Board as part of the dissertation process. The College must review
and approve any research sanctioned by the College involving human subjects. All
policies and procedures pertaining to the Institutional Review Board are contained in the
Walsh College publication “Institutional Review Board Policies and Procedures”.
Policy on Academic Integrity and Plagiarism
Walsh College regards academic honesty to be essential to the entire academic
enterprise and will not tolerate any violation. Like all other Walsh students, doctoral
students have agreed to comply with the Walsh Academic Integrity Policy as stated on
the following web page: http://www.walshcollege.edu/currentstudents/ and affiliated
web pages. An excerpt is as follows:
“Students, faculty, and staff are expected to follow established standards of academic integrity and
honesty. Academic misconduct entails dishonesty or deception in fulfilling academic requirements
and includes but is not limited to cheating, plagiarism, or the furnishing of false information to the
College or a College affiliate in matters related to academics. An affiliate of the College is any
person, organization, or company who works in conjunction with Walsh College of Accounting
and Business for the purposes of assisting students in fulfilling their academic requirements. It is
therefore this institution’s stated policy that no form of dishonesty among its faculty or students
will be tolerated. Although all members of the College community have an obligation to report
occurrences of dishonesty, each individual is principally responsible for his or her own conduct.”
In The Craft of Research (Booth, Colomb, and Williams, 1995), the authors offer a useful
definition of plagiarism:
”You plagiarize even when you do credit the author but use his exact words without so indicating with
quotation marks or block indentation. You also plagiarize when you use words so close to those in your
source, that if your work were placed next to the source, it would be obvious that you could not have written
what you did without the source at your elbow.” (p.167)
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 16
The following excerpts show the difference between plagiarism and paraphrasing,
according to the Booth et al. definition:
Original from Severin and
Tankard (1992)
Plagiarism per Booth et al.
(1995)
Acceptable Paraphrase per Booth et al. (1995)
There is evidence to suggest that newsmakers
are becoming particularly savvy about placing
items on the media agenda. When, for example,
President Reagan was running for his second
term, he took a tour to promote his
administration’s record on environmentalism.
The tour was full of photo opportunities,
including the president standing on a fishing
boat in the Chesapeake Bay and the president
wearing a park ranger’s hat at Mammoth
Cave, Kentucky. Even though some thought
that the Reagan administration had a terrible record on the environment, many people were
likely to see photos of the president in the
ranger hat and make a positive link between
Reagan and the environment.
Evidence suggests that newsmakers are
becoming keenly aware about placing
items on the media agenda.
When, for instance, President Reagan ran
for his second term, he took a tour to
promote his administration’s
environmental record. The tour was full
of photo ops, including Reagan on a
fishing boat in the Chesapeake Bay and the
president wearing a park ranger’s hat in
Kentucky. Even though a few
environmentalists said Reagan’s record on
the environment was terrible, people who
saw photos of the president in the ranger
hat made a positive association between
Reagan and the environment.
(Severin & Tankard, 1992, p.224).
Sererin and Tankard (1992) observed that a
president has considerable power to form public
opinion by using the media to his advantage. As
an example, they cite President Reagan’s photo ops
during the 1984 campaign, in which he was shown
visiting several remote national resources.
Although environmentalists complained about
Reagan’s record on the environment, “many people
were likely to see photos of the president in the
ranger hat and make a positive link between
Reagan and the environment” (p.224).
In the above example of plagiarism, the authors were credited with an author-
date-page number citation at the end of the paragraph, but the words and ideas are
straight out of Severin and Tankard. Because of the conventions of documenting sources,
the reader cannot distinguish in the plagiarized example who originated the ideas and
words. For a lengthy discussion of the ethics of scholarly writing, see section 8.05 in the
fifth edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA).
Walsh uses a service provided by turnitin.com to check manuscripts (dissertations and
theses) for plagiarism. Submission to this service is handled and determined by the
committee Chairperson. Any instance of suspicion will be expressed to the committee
members and student, and will slow the completion process.
Walsh reserves the right to rescind the Doctor of Management in Executive Leadership
degree once conferred if subsequent evidence of academic misconduct is determined.
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 17
Section 2: Style at Walsh College
The APA Style
Students writing dissertations must use the sixth edition of the Publication Manual
of the American Psychological Association (APA). In instances where the APA manual may
conflict with Walsh’s requirements, the College style standards prevail.
Font Type and Size
The recommended font is Palatino Linotype. You may choose to use Arial or
Times New Roman fonts if you prefer. All text copy must be printed in the same font.
The size of the body text, tables, and figures font should be 12 points, with title, headings
and subheadings 14 points. The font size used in tables and figures may be smaller than
that used in the text; however, to ensure legibility on microfilm, use fonts no smaller than
8 points. Grayscale (shading) and color used in figures often will not reproduce well on
microfilm. Instead, use crosshatching or broken lines.
The title of the dissertation should not include chemical or mathematical formulas,
symbols, superscripts, subscripts, Greek letters, or other nonstandard characters; words
must be substituted for any such characters. (The UMI/ProQuest guidebook goes into
this in more depth.) In general, boldface type should be avoided in dissertations,
although exceptions are made in tables and figures when its use improves readability.
Highlighted words, such as words being defined on first reference, and titles of books,
journals, newspapers, and magazines, must appear in italics or underlined, not set in
quotation marks or boldface. Be consistent in the use of either italics or underlines
throughout the dissertation.
Type of Paper, Margins and Justification
The dissertation must be printed on letter size paper (8.5 inches wide by 11 inches
high) 25% white cotton bond paper. Bond paper has an embedded water mark indicating
the cotton content which is visible when held up to the light. Onionskin or regular copier
paper is NOT acceptable. Nothing should appear in the margins. All page numbers, text,
tables, and illustrations must be contained completely inside the area bounded by the
margins. Pages containing tables and figures may be formatted in landscape page setup.
The bound margin must be 1½ inches wide. Page numbers should be placed consistently
with the rest of the manuscript. Students who use Microsoft Word should be certain that
the page number placement is defaulted to 1 full inch from the bottom edge of the paper
and centered in the footer.
The margins of the dissertation must conform to the following guidelines (this
includes the appendices, exhibits and the curriculum vitae (CV)):
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 18
Left: 1½ inches (to allow for binding).
Right: 1 inch. The right margin must be ragged—not justified—throughout the
dissertation.
Top: 1 inch.
Bottom: 1 inch.
The page number must appear one full inch from the bottom edge of the page, centered
within the footer.
The first page of the body of the dissertation (Chapter 1 page) is numbered 1.
Spacing
• Double-spacing should be used between lines of text, between text and a block
quotation, between paragraphs, and between a heading and subsequent text.
• Acknowledgments and dedications must be double-spaced.
• Triple-spacing must be used between a heading and preceding text.
• Do not leave a heading “floating” at the bottom of a page without accompanying
text.
• Begin each chapter on a new page.
• Do not begin each section (within a chapter) on a new page. Sections should
follow one another immediately in order to avoid large blank spaces.
• One-line “widows” and “orphans” are acceptable at the top and bottom of a page;
however, for increased readability, two lines are preferred.
• Single-space block quotations.
• Double-space table of contents and figure and table captions.
• Double-space reference list entries.
• Triple-space between tables and figures and subsequent and preceding text.
• If a table or figure takes up more than three fourths of a page, do not place any
additional text on the page.
• End-of-line hyphenation is not acceptable in Walsh dissertations.
Pagination and Sequence of Preliminary Pages
Page Number Spacing In Table of
Contents?
Blank page Mandatory Not counted, not numbered No
Title page Mandatory Counted, not numbered No
Abstract Mandatory Counted, not numbered Double No
Copyright Optional Counted, not numbered Double No
Dedication Optional Counted, Roman numbered Double No
Acknowledgements Optional Counted, Roman numbered Double No
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 19
Table of Contents Mandatory Counted, Roman numbered Double No
List of Tables Optional Counted, Roman numbered Double Yes
List of Figures Optional Counted, Roman numbered Double Yes
Definitions of
Terms and
Acronyms
Optional Counted, Roman numbered Double Yes
Body Mandatory Counted, Arabic numbered Double Yes
Reference List Mandatory Counted, Arabic numbered Double Yes
Appendices Optional Counted, Arabic numbered Depends
on content
Yes
Curriculum Vitae Mandatory Counted, Arabic numbered Yes
Section 3: Preliminary and Subsequent Pages
Title Page
The title page is the cover page of the dissertation. Chairperson’s name and
signature appears on the title page.
Abstract
The abstract must be double-spaced and no longer than 350 words; one page is
preferred. No page number appears on the abstract. The abstract is used by researchers
as an overview of the topic before accessing the entire dissertation. As noted in the sixth
edition of the APA manual, the abstract should be accurate, self-contained, concise and
specific, coherent, readable, and informative. As a marketing tool, the abstract should
provide a succinct, descriptive account of the paper that includes the following elements:
• A brief statement of the research problem and purpose.
• A brief exposition of methods and procedures.
• A brief summary of the findings.
• A brief summary of the implications of the research on practice and theory.
Double-space all lines and include all pertinent place names and other proper
nouns, which are very useful in automated retrieval. Do not include tables or figures in
the abstract.
Trademark and Copyright Information
A statement of copyright ownership to a dissertation is required, even though by
federal law a copyright exists once a work is “fixed in a tangible form of expression.” If a
copyright notice is added, place this wording at the bottom of the acknowledgments
page: © [year] by [author’s name]. All rights reserved.
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 20
Copyrights are not required for a proposal, but they are for a dissertation. When a
dissertation is submitted to UMI/ProQuest, copyrights are included in the process.
If previously copyrighted material is used in the dissertation beyond “fair use,”
certification to reproduce the material by the copyright owner is required. To determine
if something is “fair use,” consider four issues:
• The purpose and character of the use.
• The nature of the copyrighted work.
• The amount and substantiality of the portion used.
• The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work.
You should seek permission if any of the following criteria exists:
• Long quotations. One and one half pages or 500 words or more.
• Reproduced publications. This includes standard survey instruments or
questionnaires and articles, such as newspaper or magazine articles, included in
the appendix.
• Graphic or pictorial works.
In general, permission to reproduce tables and figures reproduced or modified from
published works not in the public domain must be demonstrated, most often by a copy of
the letter of permission in an appendix. Permission to reprint is usually indicated on the
first page of a copyrighted document, following the wording requested by the copyright
holder.
Copying Test Instruments, Surveys, and Questionnaires
Gaining permission to reproduce a survey instrument for participants in a study is
not the same as permission to reproduce it in the dissertation. If the committee asks to
include a published document in the dissertation itself, specific authorization must be
obtained from the copyright holder.
Dedication Page
This optional page is counted and numbered and must be double-spaced.
Acknowledgments Page
Many writers choose to recognize the help of friends, colleagues, mentors and
family members on this page. The acknowledgments page, too, is optional. Research
funding, grants, permission to reprint copyrighted materials, and any other copyright
information that is not placed in the appendix should be acknowledged on this page.
Publishers usually require specific wording. The word ACKNOWLEDGMENTS appears
in uppercase letters at the top of the page, centered. The preferred spelling of
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 21
acknowledgments is without the letter e after the g. The page is double-spaced. The
pagination is page ii and is centered 1 inch from the bottom of the page.
Table of Contents
Do not list anything in the table of contents that appears before it. The use of a dot
leader is preferred. The table of contents acts as the outline for the dissertation and
should reflect the levels of organization within the dissertation. For example:
LIST OF TABLES…………………………………. VIII
LIST OF FIGURES…………………………………... IX
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY….….1
Background…………………………………..1
Garden Flowers………………………………2
Tulips………………….…...3
Roses……………………….7
Daisies………………….......9
In this table of contents, the organizational structure is apparent to the reader and
identifies how the subsections relate to each other. The table of contents in the
dissertation should be organized to fully represent the various levels used in the
dissertation itself. Please see the section on pagination for instructions on numbering the
page of the Table of Contents.
List of Tables and List of Figures
A list of tables is required if one table or more is used. The list of tables must be on
a separate page following the table of contents and must include table numbers, titles,
and page numbers, even if only one item is listed.
A list of figures is required if one table or more is used. The list of figures must be
on a separate page following the table of contents and list of tables (if any), and must
include figure numbers, figure title, and page numbers, even if only one item is listed.
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 22
Definitions of Terms and Acronyms
Many dissertations include a brief listing of key terms that the author interprets
and clarifies for the reader’s benefit. In general, do not define a common terms, list only
ambiguous, controversial, or operational terms used throughout the dissertation. If
necessary, technical terms are usually defined in the text. Definitions must be explicit,
specific, and scholarly.
Walsh suggests these two options for defining key terms. Consult your
dissertation committee chairperson about what is most appropriate for the reader’s
comprehension.
1. Define more common terms, particularly acronyms and technical terms with only
immediate application for the reader, upon first usage.
2. List key words or phrases in a section called Definition of Terms and Acronyms,
prior to the first chapter.
Note that it is important to give proper credit to the originator of the definition.
When defining a term, determine whether the definition belongs in the list or in the text.
Body Text Reference List
The reference list comes after the body of your dissertation and before the
appendices.
Note that a reference list cites works that specifically support the dissertation. A
bibliography cites works for further reading. As such, dissertations require reference lists
but not bibliographies. Please refer to the sixth edition of the APA publication guide for
more information regarding the Reference List. Here are some general features of the
Reference List:
• The reference list must be paginated.
• Use the first and middle (if any) initials of all authors; do not write out the first
name. There should be a space between the initials. With two or more authors, use
& rather than and before the last author. Separate the names with a comma.
• Et al. cannot be used in the reference section. If known, all authors must be listed.
• If two or more of the works by a single author or set of authors have the same
publication date, the dates are assigned the letters a, b, c, and so on.
• For the titles of books and journal articles, capitalize only the first word of the title
and of the subtitle, and any proper nouns. Use italics or underlines in a manner
consistent with the rest of the manuscript. Italics are preferred for titles of books.
The titles of journals are capitalized in the “normal” title case manner and
underlined or italicized in a manner consistent with the rest of the dissertation.
• Quotation marks should not be used around titles of journal articles.
• The abbreviations Vol. and No. are not used in reference to journals.
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 23
• The volume number should be underlined or italicized (consistent with the rest of
the document), and the issue number (if any) should be in parentheses, followed
by a comma and the page numbers.
• In reference lists, use U.S. postal code abbreviations for state names. Some large
cities, including New York, Chicago, and San Francisco, do not need to be
identified by state. In text copy, spell out the names of states and countries.
• Page numbers of journal articles should not be preceded by p. or pp.
Appendices and Exhibits
The appendices and exhibits follow the Reference List. They are lettered A, B, C,
and so on. Appendices are the equivalent of tables within the text but are usually more
extensive, or may be a letter or a form. Exhibits are the equivalent of figures and
diagrams within the text. Individual items within the appendices are labeled A1, A2, and
so forth, and items within the Exhibits are labeled E1, E2, E3. If there is only one
appendix, it gets no letter. A (blank) divider page is unnecessary between appendices
unless the reader is served or if a heading cannot be placed on the first page of an
appendix. (Typically this could be a reprinted document.) The materials in the appendix
must not extend beyond the margins of the rest of the dissertation: reduce the appendix
materials on a photocopier as needed. Use only one side of the page. Avoid color on any
appendix materials that will be photocopied or microfilmed.
In general, permission to reproduce tables and figures reproduced or modified
from published works not in the public domain must be demonstrated, most often by a
copy of the letter of permission in an appendix. Permission to reprint is usually indicated
on the first page of a copyrighted document, following the wording requested by the
copyright holder.
Curriculum Vitae
The curriculum vitae (CV) is the final item listed in the table of contents. A copy of
the author’s CV or résumé must be included at the very end of the dissertation. The CV
may be formatted in either basic outline form, as a résumé, or full-sentence form. The CV
must conform to the same margin specifications as the dissertation and be included in the
pagination.
Section 4: Body Text
Headings
Headings must be worded identically in the table of contents and the text. Do not
strand a heading at the bottom of a page. Headings should not be labeled with letters or
numbers.
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 24
Different from the 6th Edition APA, follow the following guidelines for dissertation
headings:
CHAPTER III: METHODOLOGY – Centered, uppercase
Methods of Data Collection – Centered, title case
Method 1: Qualitative Interviews- Centered, italicized, title case
Elite Interviews – flush left, italicized, title case
Challenges Interviewing CEOs. – Indented, italicized, title case. Paragraph heading
ending with a period.
Tables and Figures In the body of the dissertation, information that does not appear in textual form
must be formatted and labeled as either a table or figure. APA does not allow for the
words graph, illustration, or chart. Refer to them as either a table or a figure.
Tables and figures are to be numbered without a suffix or indicator of the chapter
in which they appear: Table 1, Table 2, Table 3; Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, and so on. In
the appendixes, tables are called A1, A2, A3, and so forth. Figures are called E1, E2, E3,
and so on. In the text, capitalize the words TABLE or FIGURE when referring to them.
Refer to the specific table number, not to the page number on which it appears. A table
or figure must be referenced within the text prior to the appearance of table or figure.
Place the word Table and the table number above the table, flush left. The title of
the table appears alongside, on top of the table, title case, flush left in bold.
Place the word Figure and the figure number double-spaced under the figure, flush
left in bold. The title of the figure goes next to the number in title case. In dissertations,
do not type captions on a separate page.
Formatting Lists in Block Quotes
If copying from text that already appears in list form in the original source,
determine if the entire quote needs to be included. The text may be better served with a
paraphrase. If a block quote of a list is required, single-space the block quote and indent
the entire set of items in the list. By single-spacing and properly punctuating the end of
the block quote, the reader will identify this as a block quote.
Words Defined and Words Used as Words
To emphasize a word or highlight a word used as a word, set it in italic type or
underline it on first reference. Be consistent throughout the document. This most often
occurs in the context of defining a word, term, or phrase. Roman, not italic, type, should
be used for such scholarly words and abbreviations as ibid, et al., and etc. An exception is
made for the term sic, which is always set in brackets.
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 25
Verb Tense
A significant portion of the dissertation proposal will be written in future tense. In
the review of literature, use the past tense when discussing another’s work (e.g., Jones
(2009) showed). Once the study has been completed, the dissertation will appear in
present and past tense as appropriate. As a general rule ongoing issues and current
realities should be reported in present tense. What has occurred, what has been reported,
and what the writer and sources have accomplished should be reported in past tense.
First-Person and Third-Person
Narratives in Walsh dissertations are written in the third person. Any exceptions
to this Walsh policy should be approached only in careful consultation with your
Chairperson. First-person narratives are permissible in the dedication, acknowledgments,
and CV.
Numbers and Percentages
The sixth edition of the APA style guide has an extensive section dealing with the
nuances of typing numbers. Always check the manual if unsure of the proper style.
1. In general, numbers 10 or greater are written as numerals.
2. Write as numerals all numbers that denote a specific place in a numbered series or
in parts of books and tables, and each number in a list of four or more numbers.
Use a percentage sign, not the word percent, unless connected to a number at the
start of a sentence.
3. Write as numerals all numbers that represent time, dates, ages, or points on a scale;
numerals as numerals; and numbers preceding a unit of measurement. Ordinal
numbers follow the pattern of cardinal numbers.
4. Use commas in most figures of 1,000 or more.
Section 5: Documenting Sources
Parenthetical In-Text Citations
APA requires the parenthetical referencing (author-date) system. Authors’ names
and dates of publication are given in parentheses within the text or at the end of block
quotations. These parenthetical citations are reflections of items in a reference list placed
at the end of the paper and arranged alphabetically by the authors’ last names and
chronologically within lists of works by a single author. Any reference listed on the
experience page must be cited within the dissertation. Any source cited within the
dissertation must be listed on the references page.
Consult the APA’s section and examples on in-text and block citations when
writing scholarly papers, including exceptions and explications.
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 26
Electronic Sources
Please refer to the sixth edition of the APA Manual regarding the citing of
electronic sources of information.
Content Footnotes
APA does not allow for endnotes or source footnotes. Content footnotes, used
sparingly, may assist the reader. In general, however, something important enough to
appear in a content footnote is important enough to appear in the text, so Walsh
encourages minimal use of content footnotes.
Section 6: Writing Mechanics
Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate Dictionary (11th ed.) is Walsh’s authority for matters of
spelling. Follow the guidelines for mechanics of style in the sixth edition of the APA.
Consult the index of the style manual for more information.
• In most cases, make the possessive form of proper names ending in s by
adding an apostrophe and s.
• Quotation marks nearly always go outside the final punctuation.
• The proper format for a dash is two hyphens with no space between them
or on either side.
• Use double quotation marks for quotations. Use single quotation marks
within double quotation marks only.
• For a quote within a quote in a block quotation, the internal quote gets
double quotation marks.
• The subject and verb must agree in number (i.e., singular or plural). Data
and media are plural nouns. Datum and medium are singular nouns.
• Pronouns must agree in number and gender with the nouns they replace.
• Do not use contractions.
• No comma appears between the month and year when used alone.
Inclusive Language
Language used in scholarly writing should be inclusive. By now, most writers
know the gender-restrictive nature of words like policeman, mailman, or fireman.
Accordingly, students should employ words that are not sexist and more accurately
describe American society.
Some ethnicity and nationality titles require sensitivity due to historically racist
usage: Oriental, American Indian, and Eskimo, for example. Please consult the sixth
edition of the APA Style Guide for examples and remedies.
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 27
One of the most troublesome issues related to sexist language for writers revolves
around the pronouns he and she. The combination he or she is common if cumbersome;
some readers resent if he always precedes she. Some writers choose as a matter of course
to only use the word he and then add a note of apology at the beginning of a manuscript.
This is dated and seen as a poor solution by many readers. Some writers go back and
forth between he and she—also cumbersome, but effective in certain instances.
One frequent solution is changing the singular third-person pronoun to the plural
they.
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 28
This is a sample of a Title page.
EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE, SHARED VISION
AND TEAMWORK EFFECTIVENESS
by
JOHN JAMES DOE
Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements
for the degree of Doctor of Management in Executive Leadership
Advisory Comittee: Joseph Jones, Ph.D, Advisor
Sally Smith, Ph.D
Mike Lee, Ph.D
WALSH COLLEGE OF ACCOUNTANCY AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
June, 2010
(anticipated date of graduation)
Doctoral Proposal & Dissertation Guidelines 29
This is a sample of an abstract page.
EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE, SHARED VISION
AND TEAMWORK EFFECTIVENESS
ABSTRACT
Work teams have become increasingly important, yet do not always perform in an
efficient manner. Researchers have developed conceptual and normative models of
group behavior and have mapped them to teamwork effectiveness criteria such as team
composition, conscientiousness, agreeableness, and emotional stability. Despite these
behavioral-science research attempts to improve teamwork effectiveness, operational
models and guidelines for practitioners are still lacking.
Moreover, there is a gap in the literature concerning two particular factors that
contribute to teamwork effectives, emotional intelligence and group shared vision.
Qualitative research based on semi-structured interviews with members of successful and
struggling teams is proposed to produce a grounded theory about how these two factors
contribute to team effectiveness. Implications for both scholars and practitioners are
suggested.