Upload
dinhnhu
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DOCUMENT RESUME
ED 412 587 CS 509 628
AUTHOR Flores, Norma LandaTITLE How Golden West College Is Addressing Pedagogical,
Assessment, and Accountability Concerns through IntegratedSpoken Communication Labs.
PUB DATE 1997-11-00NOTE 72p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National
Communication Association (83rd, Chicago, IL, November19-23, 1997).
AVAILABLE FROM Golden West College Speech Center, Golden West College,15744 Golden West Street, Huntington Beach, CA 92647 (1 copyfree) .
PUB TYPE Reports Descriptive (141) Speeches/Meeting Papers (150)EDRS PRICE MF01/PC03 Plus Postage.DESCRIPTORS Course Descriptions; Curriculum Development; Higher
Education; Interpersonal Communication; LearningLaboratories; Performance Based Assessment; *SpeechCommunication; *Student Evaluation; Student Placement
IDENTIFIERS *Communication Competencies; *Golden West College CA;Nonnative Speakers
ABSTRACTThis paper describes how results of the Golden West College
Speech Department's program review led to the alignment of performance-basedcommunication prerequisite and outcome expectations for: student elacementrecommendation; consistency of course curriculum and sequencing; measures ofcontent-based competencies; and measures of performance-based criteria. Oralcommunication lab experiences can be coordinated, supervised, and monitoredfor pre-mainstream speech courses instilling functional communication skillsfor non-native speakers. Also, the report shows what the alignment ofprerequisite and outcomes expectations can do to coordinate interrelatedmainstream classroom communication skills through the development of coursespecific skills demonstration assessment forms used by peer assessors in theSpeech Communication Center to assess skills in interpersonal communication,public speaking, and principles of communication. Finally, the paper pointsout that using performance-based criteria guarantees bias free "goodness offit" assessment measures. Golden West College has discovered that assessorscan avoid cultural bias by using the concept of "goodness of fit" to thecontext as the criteria to measure the appropriateness of the speaker'sverbal and nonverbal behaviors in the coordinated/integrated oralcommunication lab settings. Contains 23 references. (RS)
********************************************************************************
Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be madefrom the original document.
********************************************************************************
tioriS
Alorkna Londe' Flores, Associate Professor.9Golden West College Speech Comynunication Department15744 Golden West Steeet, -Huntington Beach, Co. 92647Phone (714) 892-7711 ext. 5114 Fax (714) 895-8243
1-401/11 Golden West College L.7s AddeessingPeclagogiccil,Assessment,
And AccountabilityConceens TheotAgh (..7ntegecitedSpoken Comunication Labs
"PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THISMATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY
L .
TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)."
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONOffice of Educational Research and Improvement
EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATIONCENTER (ERIC)
This document has been reproduced asreceived from the person or organizationoriginating it.
Minor changes have been made toimprove reproduction quality.
Points of view or opinions stated in thisdocument do not necessarily representofficial OERI position or policy.
Presented At The 6 ighty Third Annual Meeting Of TheAlational Communication Association, Chicago, Jllinois
Aloveknbee 19-23, 1997
by
p.12
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
ContentsPage
How Golden West College is Addressing Pedagogical, Assessment, and Accountability Concerns 3
Sample Perception Checking Labs Skills Revisions 4
Spring/Fall 1994 Program Review Qualitative Data Addressed 6
Fall 1995 Revised Course Numbering As Related To Speech, ESL and English Prerequisites 9
GWC Speech Communication Center Lab Processes for Mainstream Courses 10
Sp 100, Interpersonal Communication: Assertion Skill Demonstration Assessment 10
Sp 108, Communication Principles: Expressing Opinions Skill Demonstration Assessment 12
Sp 110, Public Speaking: Outlining & Practicing a Speech to Motivate to Action Peer Evaluation 14
Evaluation of a Persuasive Speech to Motivate to Action Presentation 17
GWC Integrated Spoken Communication Lab Processes for Non-Native Speakers of English 19
Sp 027, Advanced Pronunciation Skills: Outlining & Practicing a Speech to Describe aJob-Related Object Skill Demonstration Assessment 19
Sp 025, Speaking and Listening Skills: Process Speech Skill Practice Session Assessment 20
Sp 020, Intermediate Pronunciation Skills: Outlining & Practicing a Speech ofSelf-Introduction Skill Demonstration Assesment 25
Sp 020: Assessment of Oral Communication & Pronunciation Competency 28
Development of Oral Communication Curriculum Guidelines for K-8, High School, and College 29
A.L. Chaney and T.L. Burk's (1998), Teaching Oral Communication in Grades K-8 29
Interviews and Constructed -Response Assessments in Communication Portfolios 31
Assessment of Communication Competency and English Speaking Skills- -
Elementary School Oral Performance, N.L. Flores(1996) 33
Facilitating Authentic Cultural Collaboration and RedefinitionProcesses in Communication-Friendly Classrooms, N.L.Flores (1993)
Intercultural Assessment of Communication Competency & English Speaking
SkillsHigh School Edition, N.L. Flores (1994)
Intercultural Assessment of Communication Competency & English Speaking Skills-
Project AERO/Community College Edition, N.L. Flores (1994) 39
Sp 060 (formerly Sp 020) Content Review and Pronouncing, Speaking, Listening Skills Standards 41
Sp 110 (formerly Sp 105) Content Review and Pronouncing, Speaking, and Listening Skills Standards 46
GWC Speech Dept. Pedagogical, Assessment, and Accountability Concerns As Related to Speech Labs 54
35
37
2
How Golden West College is Addressing Pedagogical, Assessment, andAccountability Concerns through Dialogic and Integrative Strategies
This presentation will describe how results of the Golden West College Speech Department's
program review led to the alignment of performance-based communication prerequisite andoutcome expectations for:(1) student placement recommendation, (2) consistency of coursecurriculum and sequencing, (3) measures of content-based competencies, (4) measures ofperformance-based criteria in order to more effectively and efficiently assess multiculturalstudents' communication competency skills.
The Golden West College Speech Department's goal is to provide speech students with "real"
"genuine" and "authentic" feedback through speech interaction demonstrations and assessments
in "speaker friendly" communication settings. This goal was derived from the Department'sphilosophy that the importance and centrality of communication to the students in our specific
community is, "the skill of facilitating a coming together of shared meaning within culturallydiverse contexts." Thus, our objectives will be described as (1) to coordinate the English andESL Department's matrixes of prerequisite and outcome expectations with the Speech Depart-
ment's matrix of prerequisite and outcome expectations, (2) to develop and teach competency-
based curriculum (3) to establish course consistency in cohesiveness of content and sequencingof levels of proficiency and(4) to form more perfect articulation links from K -12 to College
and from College to University and/or Work through the identification of criterion referencedspeaking, listening and media literacy standards.
In terms of services that the Golden West College Speech Communication Center offers, this
report will show how oral communication lab experiences can be coordinated, supervised, and
monitored for pre-mainstream speech courses instilling functional communication skills fornon-native speakers. Oral lab interactions with volunteers and tutors evaluating non-nativespeaker's cross-cultural context-based pronunciation, and spoken vocational communicationskills, will be described. Listening and media literacy feedback interaction in the Language Lab
will be described as well as the use of mainstream speech students' peer assessment of speaking
and listening skill demonstrations in the Intercultural Center, Speech Center, and LearningAssistance/Tutoring Center for both mainstream speakers and non-native speakers of English.
Also, this report will show what the alignment of prerequisite and outcomes expectations can
do to coordinate interrelated mainstream classroom communication skills through the develop-ment of course specific skills demonstration assessment forms used by peer assessors in theSpeech Communication Center to assess skills in (1) interpersonal communication, (2) publicspeaking and 3) principles of communication.
Finally, this paper will point out that using performance-based criteria guarantees bias free
"goodness of fit" assessment measures. The springboard to motivation to maintain inter-raterreliability and content validity in assessment of oral communication instruments and speaker's
responses, is the concept of "goodness of fit." At Golden West College we have discovered thatassessors can avoid cultural bias by using the concept of "goodness of fit" to the context as thecriteria to measure the appropriateness of the speaker's verbal and nonverbal behaviors inour coordinated/integrated oral communication lab settings.
P.3
4
Skill #2:Clarifying Perceptions
Name Instructor Class(Hr/Day)
Purpose: To demonstrate the ability to check perceptions by:
1. Describing observed behavior.2. Describing probable assumptions about the observed behavior to demonstrate
flexible thinking.3. Making an open-ended request for feedback.4. Using owned language.
Mastery:
1. I begin by identifying the topic I want to discuss with my partner._2. I describe an instance of my partner's behavior (something my partner has said or done).
3. I state 2 different probable assumptions I am making about my partner's behavior._4. I make an objective and open-ended request for feedback about the accuracy of my
observations and assumptions.5. I close the conversation by restating my partner's response to clarify my understanding,
and I express support or appreciation.6. I consistently use owned language.
Satisfactory:
1. I begin by identifying the topic I want to discuss with my partner.2. I describe an instance of my partner's behavior.
_3. I state 1 probable assumption I am making about my partner's behavior._4. I make an objective and open-ended request for feedback about the accuracy of my
observations and assumptions._5. I close the conversation by restating my partner's response to clarify my understanding.
6. I used owned language no more than 1 time.
Needs To Be Repeated:
_1. I do not begin by identifying the topic I want to discuss with my partner._2. I do not report an example of my partner's behavior._3. I do not state an assumption I am making about this behavior._4. I do not request feedback from my partner or I use a closed or leading question to
request feedback.5. I do not close the conversation by summarizing or do not express support or appreciation.
_6. I use disowned language 2 or more times.
Comments:
MasterySatisfactory
_Repeat STAFF SIGNATURE
12114ptio,o
Skill Demonstration # Speech Communication Center
NAMEINSTRUCTOR
BRING A PARTNER TO LABRelational Situation will be assigned from a list
Purpose: To demonstrate the ability to clarify perceptions about another's behavior.During this skill demonstration you successfully:
1. YES NO Consistently Used Owned Language during skill Demonstration - ( I, My, Me).
2. YES NO Initiated conversation by greeting partner.
3. YES NO Identified time/place of event to clarify with partner.
4. YES NO Described two or more of partner's behaviors (what was seen or heard) related to this event.
5. YES NO Described two or more possible assumptions about partner's behavior.
6. YES NO Requested feedback about the accuracy of observations and interpretations.
7. YES NO Restated partner's response to clarify understanding of this event.
8. YES NO Closed the conversation by using one of the following:expressed appreciation and/ or supportsummarizedestablished future contactprovided a reason
9. YES NO Speaking during this skill demonstration was easy to understand.
10. YES NO Avoided Nonverbal Behaviors that contradict, distract, and/or disrupt the conversation
Comment:
Mastery - Yes on All items STAFF SIGNATURESatisfactory -Yes on items 2-7Needs to be repeated - No on item 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 or 7_
5 6
Golden West College Date: Spring/Fall 1994
Program Review Resource Data
QUALITATIVE DATA
Division: Language ArtsInstructional Program: Speech Communication
1. Provide evidence that faculty and administrators in discipline work cooperatively towardmutually identified goals.
Full time and adjunct speech faculty provided input in orderto identify program strengths and weaknesses and to makerecommendations on what to maintain and what to change,by interfacing with the Department Chair and the LanguageArts Division Dean to consolidate and prioritize goals.
2. Provide evidence that the discipline is responsive to changing conditions within the field.
Department members attended the California SpeechCommunication Association's Conference on Articulationand Standards, as well as reviewing updates on the A.ICATask Force for Speaking, Listening, and Media LiteracyStandards progress and how standards effect the aWCcompetency-based speech communication program.
3. Provide evidence that the discipline is responsive to changing enrollment patterns.
c.701 order to provide basic skills courses for students planningto transfer to four year institutions and to meet the needs ofstudents whose majors require public presentations, we haveincreased the amount of sections we offer in (1) principles ofcommunication (2) publiuc speaking and (3) argumentation.3-n addition, we have increased the amount of courses andsections we offer in functional spoken communication for ourgrowing number's of non-native speakers of English to bridgethem into our fundamental and basic skills speech classeswhich require increased levels of speaking and listening skillspro ficiency. Furthermore, we have developed vocationallyrelated courses to serve the needs of those entering the workforce.
p.6
4. If this program were to be reduced or eliminated, please provide evidence that otherprograms in the college would be seriously affected.
Sp Com 100, Sp Com 110, Sp Com 175, and Sp Com 205are required general education courses to be completed toearn an A.A. degree, to transfer to CSIA and 14C systems,and as part of many majors requiring oral communicationskills in dealing with the public. Furthermore, using effectivespeaking, listening and media literacy skills increases thequality of classroom student/teacher interactions and enablesinteractants to adapt authentic anwers to authentic questionswhich contributes to growth in student degrees of coursework abilities.
5. Provide evidence that discipline faculty and administrators are actively involved in pro-fessional enrichment, advancement, and growth. How is this directly benefitting the program?
Our Department Chair participates in campus decisionmaking that affects department policies and practices as heserves on the Academic Senate, The Budget PlanningCommittee, and as a member of the California CommunityCollege Consortium. One of our faculty members is activein the development of intercultural communication curriculumthrough her participation in the jnternational CommunicationAssociation and the ,intercultural ,7nterests Areas of theNational Speech Communication Association and wasrecently honored by the Western States CommunicationAssociation as the Outstanding Community College Teacherof the Year. Our third full time member of the Speech Dept.,has designed curriculum for and taught ground breakingcourses in functional spoken communication for our specificnon-native speaker's of English student population. She isa member of the Speech Communication Association'sCommittee on Assessment and Testing interest group andhas developed, administeecl and validated two authentic
P.7
oral response assessment instruments endorsed by theNational Speech Communication Association. The progressreports to each other and to our Dean contribute toward agoal of coordinating assessment, counseling, and entry levelproficiencies with learning assistance/tutoring/ speechcenter services in a format preserving the speech program'sintegrity.
6. Provide evidence of community support, involvement, and need for the program.
The .intercultural Center facilitates spoken interactionsbetween Pronunciation Skills; Speaking and Listening Skills;.intercultural Communication) Communication Leadershipstudents and Community Volunteers. These lab assignmentsgive students realistic practice in speaking and listening togenuine feedback utilizing per formanced -based assessmentforms the Speech Department- has prepared. These methodshave also been used in curriculum designed for (1) I/6%SLPrograms (2) Project- AC-R69 (3) The Aluesing Program andmore recently (3) An Intercultural Communication unit inthe Broodcasting Program. On General, grant writers needto include oral communication skills components in all of theirproposals because the current job market demands it.
7. Provide evidence of how the program promotes success for non-traditional students.
The competency-based program provides speech studentsan opportunity to select speaking, listening, & media literacycourses at clearly identified degrees of ability and levels ofproficiency by sequencing and articulating courses so thatentry level communication apprehensive, racially, ethnically,linguistically or lifestyle diverse students can realisticallydecide which speech course will best serve their lifestyle andlearning needs and where they can go to get additional helpfrom coordinated speech lab/support services on campus.
p.8
Golden West College Speech Communication Department Revised Course Numbers:As Related To Speech, ESL and English Courses Completed and
Concurrent Enrollment Advisories For Entry/Exit Skills Prerequisites
;COURSE # BEFORE Complete Concurrent COURSE# AFTER Complete Concurrent
Sp Corn 020: ESL 002 ESL 003 Sp Corn 060: Intermediate. ESL 033 ESL 043
'Pronunciation Skills Pronun/Functional Corn
Sp Corn 027: Vocational ESL 004 ESL 005 Sp Corn 070: Advanced ESL 043 ESL 053
'Pronunciation Skills Sp Corn 020 Pronun/Voc Corn Skills Sp Corn 020
Sp Corn 030: Vocational ESL 004 ESL 005 Sp Corn 080: Vocational ESL 043 ESL 053
Commmunication Skills Sp Corn 027s Fundamental Corn Skills Sp Corn 060
Sp Com 070
Sp Corn 025: Speaking ESL 003 ESL 004
and Listening Skills
Sp Com 100:Interpersonal Corn
Sp Corn 090: Intro Corn ESL 043 ESL 053
Interpersonal/Academic Sp Corn 060
Sp Corn 070
Sp Corn 100: Sp Corn 090 English 010
Interpersonal Corn Sp Corn 095
Sp Corn 110: Sp Corn 108: Sp Corn 090 English 010
Introduction to Corn :Introduction to Corn Sp Corn 095
Sp Corn 105: English 100
Public Speaking
Sp Com 110:Public Speaking
Sp Corn 090 English 100Sp Corn 095
Sp Corn 220: 1Sp Corn 100 English 010 Sp Corn 220:
Argumentation Essen Argumentation Essen
Sp Corn 100: English 100
Sp Com 105:
Sp Corn 240: Sp Corn 100
Leadership Corn
Sp Corn 240: Sp Corn 100 English 100
Sp Com 110 Leadership Com Sp Com 10&
ESL 003, 004, 005 are ESL 033,043 053 are
ESL Intro Core Coursesincluding Oral Corn of
ESL Speaking/Listeningand Study Skills focusing
grammatical concepts on Oral Proficiency ofspoken grammar
ID-9
Take ESL 063 or 073Listening/Spealdng & Study Milt,
NAME
INSTRUCTOR
INTERPERSONALCOMMUNICATION
SPEECH COMMUNICATION 100
SKILLCOMPETENCY
DEMONSTRATIONPACKET
Interfacing throughCommunication SkillsSpeech Communication Center
895-8303
GOLDEN WEST COLLEGE
NOTE: Instructors will not record assessments in their grade booksunless the student's name is printed, in ink, on each lab sheet.
101
SPRING 1997
ASSOrlion
Skill Demonstration #NAMEINSTRUCTOR
Speech Communication Center
BRING A PARTNER TO LABTOPIC WILL BE ASSIGNED FROM LIST
Purpose: To demonstrate the ability to describe a conflict situation assertively.During this skill demonstration you successfully:
1. YES NO Consistently Used Owned Language during skill Demonstration- ( I, My, Me).
2. YES NO Initiated the conversation by referring to the topic.
3. YES NO Described your partner's behavior(s) which have prompted your concern.
4. YES NO Described your interpretation of your partner's behavior(s).
5. YES NO Indicated the consequences or result of those behaviors on you and/or your relationship.
6. YES NO Requested the specific behavioral change you want to occur in the future.
7. YES NO Described benefit(s) change may have on you, your partner or your relationship.
8. YES NO Made an Open Ended request for partner to respond.
9. YES NO Closed Conversation by:expressing appreciation and supportestablishing future contact
10.YES NO Speaking during this skill demonstration was easy to understand.
11. YES NO Used Nonverbal Behaviors that compliment and/or accent the conversation
Comment:
Mastery - Yes on all items STAFF SIGNATURESatisfactory - Yes on items 1-8Needs to be Repeated - No on item 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ,8.
11
NAME
,INSTRUCTOR
COMMUNICATIONPRINCIPLES
SPEECH COMMUNICATION 108
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
SKILLCOMPETENCY
DEMONSTRATIONPACKET
Jr..es
fr- Interfacing through5, Communication Skills
Speech CommuniCation Center>.7._ 895-8303
GOLDEN WEST COLLEGE
NOTE: Instructors will not record assessments in their grade booksunless the student's name is printed, in ink, on each lab sheet.
FALL 1997
opiNIONS
Skill Demonstration # Speech Communication Center
NAMEINSTRUCTOR
BRING A PARTNER TO LABTOPIC WILL BE ASSIGNED FROM LIST
Purpose: To demonstrate the ability to clearly describe, support and compare your opinion withanother person in an objective manner.
1. YES NO Consistently Used Owned Language during skill Demonstration- ( I, My, Me).
2. YES NO Initiated conversation by using one of the following strategies:small talk greeting compliment
3. YES NO Continued the conversation by introducing a topic for discussion.
4. YES NO Clearly stated your opinion on this topic, without using judgmental labels.
5. YES NO Provided two or more different and specific reasons in support of this opinion.Personal experiencebelieffactvaluepreferenceexpectation
6. YES NO Described what you currently do or will do because of your opinion.
7. YES NO Asked their partner to describe his/her opinion on this topic.
8. YES NO Summarized the discussion by identifying differences and/or similarities of opinions
9. YES NO Closed the conversation byexpressing appreciation and/ or supportestablishing future contactproviding a reason
10. YES NO Speaking during this skill demonstration was easy to understand.11. YES NO Spoke at an appropriate volume.
Comment:
Mastery- Yes on All items STAFF SIGNATURESatisfactory- Yes on items 1- 8Needs to Repeat - No on item 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8
13 14
Golder West College
Speech Communication 1 1 0Public Speaking Competency
Lab Interaction Workbook
Speaker's Name:
Fall 1997 TTH 11-12:30 p.m. Norma Flores, Instructor
Sp Corn 110: OL41-lining & Practicing a Speeck to Motivate to ActionSpeech Lab Interaction Procedure
(a) Speaker: Use the following outline to write in your key ideas, phrases and words.
(b) Listener: Look at the following Speech Outline as the speaker shares his/her data with you.Circle , underline, or write in any missing data you think the speaker left out.
(c) Speaker: After describing your speech strategies, the listener will give you feedback.Explain how you will improve your presentation for the day you are scheduled to speak.
Introduction
1. Attention will arouse interest
2. Relevance to listeners will create dissonance
3. Credibility: will share speaker's belief,value or attitude and intention
4. Proposition: will specifically state who should do what
5. Preview: will provide motivational guide to logic of speech
Body
I. First Main Point identifying the problem and harm of a condition
A. Factual claim of the problem condition is
1. Facts will compare numbers, percentages, occurrences
2. Second order opinion to explain cause of facts will be
3. First order evaluative opinion of the cause of the facts will be
4. Warrant linking facts and opinions to audience & speaker's value
B. Evaluative claim of harmful consequence is
1. Definition of terms in the harm are
2. Ilustration of harm & empathy is
3. Warrant linking illustration and definitions to audience & speaker's value
Transition motivational language from problem to solution
II. Second Main Point identifying speaker's concept for solving the problem
A. Coined term for alternative plan is
1. Summary of how alternative plan works is
2. Disadvantage of alternative plan is
151
B. Claim advocating speaker's plan assertively stated
1. How to start the process of solving the problem
2. Behaviors to get involved in the process
3. How to maintain the solution
Transition motivational language from solution to visualization is
III. Third Main Point adapting to audience cost/reward expectations
A. Claim of harm in ignoring speaker's solution assertively stated
1. First order testimony to illustrate cost or disadvantage is
2. Empathy in reporting consequence of cost or disadvantage is
B. Claim of benefit in following speaker's solution assertively stated
1. First order testimony to illustrate reward or advantage is
2. Empathy in reporting results of reward or advantage is
Conclusion
1. Summary of problem, solution, benefit included
2. Proposition restated
3. Initial steps to start the plan of action described
4. Wrap up reduced audience & speaker's cognitive dissonance
Listener: Circle the rating number that best indicates how competently the speakercommunicated his/her ideas for this persuasive speech to motivate to action.
1. Visual aids were discussed and will make a persuasive impact 1 2 3 4 5
2. Motivational language, transitions, and arrangement were discussed 1 2 3 4 5
3. Speaker used eye contact to adapt to listener's feedback 1 2 3 4 5
4. Speaker pronounced, articulated and emphasized persuasive meanings clearly_____ 1 2 3 4 5
5. Speaker cited sources of facts, explanations, opinions and own value 1 2 3 4 5
Points Earned: 25/21 20/16 _ 15/11 10/6 _ 5/0
Listener's Signature Speaker
Total:
Date: Lab Staff Signaturep.16
Sp
Introduction
110, Public Speaking Speaker
Evaluation of a Persuasive Speech to Motivate To Action
Rating
51. Attention aroused interest 1 2 3 4
2. Relevance to listeners created dissonance 1 2 3 4 5
3. Credibility:shared speaker's belief,value or attitude and intention__ ____ 1 2 3 4 5
4. Proposition:specifically stated who should do what 1 2 3 4 5
5. Preview:provided motivational guide to logic of speech 1 2 3 4 5
Body
I. First Main Point identified the problem and harm of a condition 1 2 3 4 5
A. Factual claim of the problem stated 1 2 3 4 5
1. Facts compared numbers, percentages, occurrences 1 2 3 4 5
2. Used second order opinion to explain cause of facts 1 2 3 4 5
3. Used first order evaluative opinion of the cause of the facts 1 2 3 4 5
4. Warrant linked facts and opinions to audience & speaker's value________ 1 2 3 4 5
B. Evaluative claim of harmful consequence stated 1 2 3 4 5
1. Definition of terms in the harm provided 1 2 3 4 5
2. Ilustration of harm provided empathy 1 2 3 4 5
3. Warrant linked illustration and definitions to audience & speaker's value__ 1 2 3 4 5
Transition motivational language from problem to solution used 1 2 3 4 5
II. Second Main Point identified speaker's concept for solving the problem_______1 2 3 4 5
A. Coined term for alternative plan provided 1 2 3 4 5
1. Summary of how alternative plan works provided 1 2 3 4 5
2. Disadvantage of alternative plan identified 1 2 3 4 5
p. 17
B. Claim advocating speaker's plan assertively stated 1 2 3 4 5
1. Informed how to start the process of solving the problem 1 2 3 4 5
2. Described behaviors to get involved in the process 1 2 3 4 5
3. Described how to maintain the solution 1 2 3 4 5
Transition motivational language from solution to visualization used 1 2 3 4 5
III. Third Main Point adapted to audience cost/reward expectations 1 2 3 4 5
A. Claim of harm in ignoring speaker's solution assertively 1 2 3 4 5
1. Used first order testimony to illustrate cost or disadvantage 1 2 3 4 5
2. Used empathy in reporting consequence of cost or disadvantage_________ 1 2 3 4 5
B. Claim of benefit in following speaker's solution assertively stated__ 1 2 3 4 5
1. Used first order testimony to illustrate reward or advantage 1 2 3 4 5
2. Used empathy in reporting results of reward or advantage_ 1 2 3 4 5
Conclusion
1. Summary of problem, solution, benefit included 1 2 3 4 5
2. Proposition restated 1 2 3 4 5
3. Initial steps to start the plan of action described 1 2 3 4 5
4. Wrap up reduced audience & speaker's cognitive dissonance 1 2 3 4 5
Delivery
1. Visual aids made persuasive impact 1 2 3 4 5
2. Eyes and kinesics used to include and reinforce audience needs 1 2 3 4 5
3. Para linguistics used to emphasize and clarify speaker's intentions_ 1 2 3 4 5
4. Language spoken clearly and used pathos to adapt to audience needs__ 1 2 3 4 5_ _
5. Use of time: start end total 1 2 3 4 5
Outline + References____ +Speech =Total_ /235= _%=Grade_ _
A=Effective B=Proficient C=Functional D=At Risk F=Restricted Multicultural Pub. Sp. Skills
5 4 3 2 1
p. 18
10
Golden West College
Speech Communication 027Advanced Pronunciation
Skills Demonstration Portfolio
Student:
Vocational Interest:
Class Meets: MW 4:30-6:00 p.m. In: Technology Bldg. Room 116
Norma Landa Flores, InstructorFall 1997
I.D.
2019
Skill #6: Outlining & Practicing a Speech To Describe a Job-Related Object
Step 1.
(a) Student: Look at pages 11 and 12 of this Lab Skills Portfolio. Notice that there are threemain ideas to talk about in your speech to (i) describe what the object looks like (ii) howtwo special features work and (iii) how to maintain the object. Look around your place ofbusiness, job-related classroom or in a vocational textbook to find a job-related object youcan show your classmates as you follow the three mainpoints listed above to describe theobject to them. Next, write words or phrase to provide the information in the blank spaceson your speech outline. After you prepare what you want to say in the body of the speech,plan what you will say in the Introduction and the Conclusion of the speech.
(b) Listener: Look at the student's outlined information on pages 11 and 12 of this LabSkills Portfolio. The student will practice speaking, in a conversational manner, (not
reading all of it) what has been outlined. As you listen to the student, write the confusingword you hear in the space on the line provided for you below. After the student has finishedpracticing the speech, share your listening observations with the student and pronouncethe words so that the student can practice pronouncing and be prepared for the speechpresentation in class.
(c) Student: Look at your speech outline, just enough to remember what you want to say. Thenspeak as though you were having a friendly conversation with the listener. When you arefinished speaking, the listener will give you some feedback about your pronunciation androle model the appropriate way to say your words. Don't forget to ask, "What did you hearme say?
Stec) II.
(a) Listener: As you listen, write in any words you think the speaker mispronounced.
Introduction (write in mispronounced words) Pronunciation (write in)
1. Hold up a picture or an actual job-related object, tool, productor some equipment and ask us to notice something about it.
2. Tell us how we can save our life, health, money, time, energyor help prevent accidents or problems by knowing about this object.
3. Tell us what kind of work this object is used in and the name of theplace of business where you have use (will use) this object.
4. Preview Main Ideas: "The purpose of my message is to describewhat this (name of object) looks like, how somespecial features of this function and how to maintain it.
Body of the Speech:
I . First I'll tell you how you can recognize the object.
A. This is what it looks like on the outside (or/top, leftside)
1. (shape, color, composition)
2. (logos, labels, size, weight)
20 21
B. On the inside (or/bottom, rightside) this is what you'll notice.
1. (shape, color, composition, smell, sound)
2. (logos, labels, size, taste, feel)
II. Next I'll explain how some special features of this object function.
A. The (name of the feature) on the outside (or/top, leftside)works this way.
1. (first you do this)
2. (second, you do this)
3. (third, you do this)
B. Another feature is called the_ (name). It's on the inside(or/bottom, rightside) and works this way:
1. (first, you do this)
2. (second, you do this)
3. (third, you do this)
III. Now that you know how to recognize the (name of object)and how to use the special functions, I'll tell you how to maintain it.
A. Before you need to use this (name of object)
1. (getting one)
2. (storing it until ready to use)
B. Safety & Efficiency Tips When Using It
1. (Safety)
2. (Efficiency)
C. After using this _ __(name of object)
1. (how to shut down, dis-assemble, re-pack)
2. (how to clean)
3. (how to put away safely & conveniently)
Conclusion:
1. Summary: (Key ideas of 3 main points)
2. Common Ground: Relate back to what we noticed about the pictureor object you showed us in the introduction
(Step II continued next page)
21
22
(b) Student: Ask the Listener, " What did you hear me say ?"
(c) Listener: Point to the area in the speech outline where you heard a confucing wordpronounced, say "Iheard you say in this place," and ask an open question
related to the word (What does the writing say on the label?") ( How do you open thebattery storage space?) (Why do you have to wait two minutes for it to shut down?" Then,help the student select an alternate word or phrase to say (without changing the student'spurpose or idea) and pronounce it outloud so that the student will follow your"pronunciation role modeling."
Step III.
(a) Listener: Circle the rating number that best indicates how competently the studentcommunicated and pronounced his/her ideas in this speech practice session. The ratingscale is: Effective=5 Proficient=4 Functional=3 At-Risk=2 Limited=1
1. Eye Contact: student looked up at me as he/she shared information 1 2 3 4 5
2. Enunciation: student student spoke loudly and clearly enough to be heard 1 2 3 4 5
3. Articulation: student explicitly pronounced word endings 1 2 3 4 5
4. Emphasis: student verbally stressed purpose & meaning of words 1 2 3 4 5
5. Organization: information & details were arranged in logical sequence 1 2 3 4 5
Total points circled=
(b) Listener: put an x next to the total points of functional/vocational pronunciationbehaviors the student demonstrated this session:
_Effective=25/ 21 _ Proficient=20/1 6 _Functional=1 5/1 1 _At-Risk=1 0/6 _ Limited=5/0
Listener's Signature_ Student.
22 2
NAME: INSTRUCTOR.
SPEECH COMMUNICATION 025
SPEAKING ANDLISTENING SKILLS
VOLUNTEER PRACTICE SESSION
and
SKILL DEMONSTRATION FORMS
INTERCULTURAL CENTER 895-8906SPEECH COMMUNICATION CENTER 895-8303
23 2SPRING 1997
PROCESS SPEECH SKILLVolunteer Practice Session
NAME:
Make an appointment in the Intercultural Center (Library, Room 116) during the week before thedue date. Bring a partner to the study session.
TAKE THIS FORM AND EXERCISE 4.3 WITH YOU TO THE APPOINTMENT.
At the appointment, you will:
1. State the process you want to explain to the class.
2. Explain your specific purpose. (For example, "I want my listeners to be able to...")
3. Give your preview statement. (This is the 3 to 5 steps of the process you want to describe tothe class.)
4. Ask your partner for suggestions about how to show the class the process so each classmatecan use the process.
FOR VOLUNTEER USE:
This student has completed 1 2 3 4 of the above material during our practice session.
I suggest the student work on:
Volunteer's Signature:
Golden West College
Speech Communication 020Intermediate PronunciationSkills Demonstration Portfolio
Student: I.D. Class Days/Hours:
Norma Landa Flores, Instructor Fall 1997
25 2
Step I.
Skill #3: Outlining & Practicing A Speech of Self-Introduction
(a) Student: Look at pages 61 and 62 in your textbook. Notice that There are two main ideasto talk about in your speech to introduce yourself to your classmates. Read Part I & II andwrite a word or short phrase in the empty lines. The words or short phrases should bein Standard American English and should relate to the outlined area of information.
(b) Listener: Look at the student's outlined information on pages 61-62 in the textbook. Thestudent will practice speaking, in a conversational manner (not reading all of it) what has
been outlined . As you listen to the student, write the confusing word you hear in the spaceon the outline provided for you below. After the student has finished practicing the speechshare your listening observations with the student and pronounce the words so that thestudent can practice pronouncing and be prepared for the speech presentation in class,
(c) Student: Look at your speech outline, just enough to remember what you want to say.Then,speak as though you were having a friendly conversation with the Listener. When you arefinished speaking, the Listener will give you some feedback about your pronunciation androle model the appropriate way to say your words. Don't forget to ask, "What did you hearme say?"
Step II.
(a) Listener: As you listen, write in any words you think the speaker mispronounced.
Body (write in mispronounced words)
I. This is some information about my background.
A. This is who I am.
1. My name is . It means __
2. The city I was born in is
3. The first language I learned to speak is
4. The amount of time I have been speaking English is
(months, years....)
B. This is what I'm interested in.
1. I'm studying pronunciation because I want to major
in
2. I'm working/have worked as a
3. I would like to work as a
4. My leisure interests are
(outlined continued next page)
Pronunciation (write phrases)
II. These are my personal values.
A. If the place I live in were burning and I could only savethree things, not people, I would save:
1. because
2 because
3. because
B. If I won nine million dollars on the "California Lotto Show,"this is what I would do with the money:
1. because
2. because
3 because
(b) Student: Ask the Listener, "What did you hear me say ? "
(c) Listener: Point to the area in the speech outline where you heard a confusing word
pronounced, Say, "'heard you say in this place," andask an open question related to the word ( What did you mean? Why did you want to saythat? Where is that place? When did you do that? Who will you help? How will youdo that?) Then, help the student select an alternate word or phrase to say (withoutchanging the student's purpose or idea) and pronounce it outloud so that the student will
follow your "pronunciation role modeling."
Step III.
(a) Listener: circle the rating number that best indicates how competently the studentcommunicated and pronounced his/her ideas in this speech practice session. The rating
scale is: Effective=5 Proficient=4 Functional=3 At-Risk=2 Limited=1
1. Eye contact, the student looked up at me as he/she shared information__1 2 3 4 5
2. Enunciation, the student spoke loudly and clearly enough to be heard 1 2 3 4 5
3. Articulation, the student explicitly pronounced word 2 3 4 5
4. Emphasis, the student verbally stressed purpose & meanings of words_____ 1 2 3 4 5
5. Organization, information & details were arranged in logical sequence 1 2 3 4 5
total points circled=
(b) Listener: put an X next to the total points of funtional/practicalpronunciation behaviors the student demonstrated this session:
_Effective =25/21 Proficient=20/1 6 Functional=1 5/1 1 At-Risk=1 0/6 Limited=5/0
Listener's Signature: Student:
27.t
SP 020:2 ssessment of Oral- Communication & Pronunciation Competency
Competency
Question Number 1:
Q:What do you like the most about this countryand why do you like that behavior or idea?
A:
Criteria Rating
__Is Audible/Encodes__Uses Standard Vowel & Consonant Sounds__Explicitly Articulates Word Endings
__Conveys Meaning of Emphasized Syllables__Communicates Message Function & Intention
Question Number 2:
Q: What is your favorite kind of work to doand why do you like that kind of work?
A:
1 2 3 4 5
__Is Audible/Encodes__Uses Standard Vowel & Consonant Sounds
__Explicitly Articulates Word Endings__Conveys Meaning of Emphasized Syllables__Communicates Message Function & Intention
Question Number 3:
Q: Give me an example of someone who didn'tunderstand you when you spoke English. Whatdid you say and what did they hear you say?
A:
1 2 3 4 5
__Is Audible/Encodes__Uses Standard Vowel & Consonant Sounds
Explicitly Articulates Word Endings__Conveys Meaning of Emphasized Syllables
__Communicates Message Function & Intention
1 2 3 4 5
Diagnostic: Work on [ ] Contrasted to [ ] Date:__ ___ Assessor:
Rating:5=Effective 4=Proficient 3=Functional 2=At-Risk 1=Restricted Tot al Score___/3=___
Sp Corn Placement Recommendation: Sp 020 _ Sp 025 _ Sp 027 _ Sp 030 _Sp 090
__ Sp 100 __ Sp 108 __ Sp 110 _ Sp 112 _ Sp 175 Sp 200 Sp 240
p.28
Prefacereaching C7ea
Communication inGrades 1-<-8Ann L. Chaney and Tamara L. BurkAllyn and Bacon, 1998
Teaching Oral Communication in Grades K-8 was inspired by our involve-ment in a project to develop a language arts curriculum for K through 8high-ability learners. Directed by Dr. Joyce Van Tassel-Baska (Center forGifted Education, The College of William and Mary) and funded by theU.S. Department of Education and the Javits Act Program (BOCES, SaratogaSprings, New York), participants collaborated to design content standardsand curriculum guidelines for K through 8 high-ability learners with ac-companying curriculum units integrating reading, writing, thinking, andoral language.
In the process of consulting with language arts teachers about contem-porary issues in oral communication pedagogy, we learned that there arevery few resources readily available to teachers that address oral commu-nication competency in the K through 8 classroom. We were also struck bythe lack of interdisciplinary scholarship on oral communication. Most ofthe literature we reviewed was either highly theoretical and directed to-ward an audience of speech communication professionals; or, at the otherextreme, directed toward language arts practitioners, but subject to somesignificant theoretical misconceptions (noted below) about the nature oforal language and its interrelationship to other strands of the language arts.Several of the most useful and theoretically sound books were written morefor an audience of undergraduate or secondary speech communicationeducators rather than for the K through 8 classroom teacher, educationgraduate student, or curriculum supervisor.
Three primary misconceptions occur frequently in oral language in-struction. First, while there is much evidence to suggest that oral commu-nication is a vital aspect of literacy and critical thinking development, aprominent misconception that oral communication is merely the ability to
293
Preface
talk has nonetheless persisted. The result has been a significant under-emphasis on oral communication within the language arts. A second factorinhibiting the effectiveness of oral language instruction is the misconcep-tion that oral communication skills central to life management, work, andlearning competence are acquired naturally as a child develops and thusneed less emphasis following the achievement of basic literacy skills. Athird, and corollary, misconception is that writing skills are highly transfer-able into oral communication skills, an assumption recently underminedby strong scholarly criticism.
In writing this book, it was our intention to address these three persis-tent misconceptions about oral communication and literacy and, thus, tohelp bridge the interdisciplinary gap between contemporary oral commu-nication theory and its actual application in the K through 8 classroom. Wehave tried to explain fundamental concepts in contemporary oral commu-nication instruction while suggesting practical strategies for implementinga competency-based approach to oral communication, both within the in-dividual classroom and as part of a larger curriculum development effort.Toward this end, the first four chapters of the book constitute a theoreticalfoundation for practical strategies suggested in later chapters.
Chapter 1 presents a view of oral communication-as-process and sug-gests that it is appropriate to place a stronger emphasis on oral languagecompetency within the integrated language arts classroom. Chapter 2 ad-dresses the creation of a communication-friendly climate in the classroomand discusses the impact of climate on communication competency, self-concept, and communication apprehension. Gender and cultural sensitiv-ity are discussed here as well. Chapter 3 presents a theoretical scope andsequence for a variety of oral communication contexts, including formalinformative and persuasive public speaking, debate, conversation, small-group discussion, dramatic performance, and media literacy. Chapter 4 isdevoted exclusively to active listening. It reviews the four primary func-tions of listening and how they interrelate to four primary speakingfunctions.
The second part of this book is more practical in its discussion of teach-ing and assessment strategies. Chapter 5 tackles the practical assessmentissues facing teachers who would like to include a greater emphasis onoral communication in their classroom, including a discussion of authenticperformance assessment, assessment methods, and tips on informal class-room evaluation. Chapter 6 suggests practical ways in which teachers canmake the most of basal and traditional language arts texts in teaching oralcommunication as process. Chapters 7 through 9 contain exercises for threelevels (K-2, 3-5, and 6-8) for use with integrated language arts programs
30
Teaching OealCommunication in
aeocles /-<-8Ann L. Chaney and Tamara L. BurkAllyn and Bacon, 1998
One of the most effective uses of videotaping is to turn the tendency to be self-critical on its head by asking the student to identify pleasant characteristics thatwere surprises, for example, "You have a good delivery. Let's talk about it for aminute. What do you think your strengths are, after viewing this tape of yourspeech/discussion/negotiation?"
Video or Audiotape PortfoliosWe recommend a system of creating and storing video or audio work products inconjunction with a speech folder containing written work products. Audiovisualwork products include:
an impromptu speechan interpersonal or conflict-management role-play exercisea small-group discussiona prepared speechpractice sessions of the activities above as well as the final products
Written work products include:
outlines of speechesnotes or concept maps to demonstrate active listeningessays about an oral communication experienceteacher evaluationsself- and peer evaluations
Another use of the videotape portfolio is to provide examples of a student'sprogress for parents. It may be important to explain to the parents what the stu-dent had learned prior to the assignment and what you were looking for in theassignment, so that they can place the activity they are viewing in its proper context.
Interviews and Constructed-Response AssessmentsExhibit 5.7 is an example of an assessment which uses the constructed-responsemethod (Flores 1995). That is, the rater asks an open-ended question and thenapplies a uniform criteria to the listener's response, which is recorded as closelyas possible on the evaluation.
31
CHAPTER 5
Exhibit 5.7 Assessment of Oral Communication and Pronunciation Competency
Rating: 5 = effective 4 = proficient 3 = functional 2 = at-risk 1 = restricted
QUESTION CRITERIA
1. What do you like most about this country, and why do Is Audibleyou like that feature? Uses Standard Vowel and Con-
sonant SoundsExplicitly Articulates WordEndingsConveys Meaning of EmphasizedSyllablesCommunicates Message Functionand Intention
Answer:
2. What is your favorite game to play and why do youlike that game?
Answer:
Is AudibleUses Standard Vowel andConsonant SoundsExplicitly Articulates WordEndingsConveys Meaning of EmphasizedSyllablesCommunicates Message Functionand Intention
3. Give me an example of someone who doesn't under-stand you when you speak English. What happenswhen you try to speak with that person?
Answer:
Is AudibleUses Standard Vowel andConsonant SoundsExplicitly Articulates WordEndingsConveys Meaning of EmphasizedSyllablesCommunicates Message Functionand Intention
Total Score: = 3
Diagnostic: Contrasted to: Date:
Reprinted with permission of Fiores (1995).
32
Assessment of Communication Competency and Ena lish
Soeakino Skills--Elementary School Oral Performance
Student's Name Teacher's Name
Message Context:
Directions: Watch the sample conversation on the tv monitor so that you can practice and take aturn presenting a a TV Conversation About an Unusual Problem Situation" withyour teacher as a tv interviewer, and your classmates as the audience that will be listeningso that they can interact with you after your conversation with the tv interviewer.
Part I.
Interviewer Question: Where were you and who was there when you noticed that an unusualproblem situation was starting to happen?
Speaker Response: (May be rated on scale as student performs skill and/or response may bewritten in the space provided on the right of this form).
Part II.
Interviewer Question: What happened that caused a problem for you, and how did you say or dosomething to solve the problem so that everyone would be happy with how you took care ofthe unusual situation?
Speaker Response: (May be rated on scale as student performs skill and/or response may bewritten in the space provided on the right of this form).
Part III.
interviewer: What part of the speaker's message needs to be clearer, audience? Who has aquestion for the speaker? (Teacher encourages audience to paraphrase, and ask an openquestion about the speaker's message).
Speaker Response: (May be rated on scale as student performs skill and/or response may bewritten in the space provided on the right of this form).
Part IV.
Interviewer: What lesson do you think you learned from your unusual problem situation andyour interaction with the audience?
Speaker Response: (May be rated on scale as student performs skill and/or response may bewritten in the space provided on the right of this form).
33 34;
Content-Based Competencies & Performance-Based Criteria Evaluation Form
FunctionalCommunication
Skills
___ParaphrasesOther's Purpose
_HighlightsOther's Ideas
Discloses Own
InformationResponds to
Questions
_Focuses onProblem/SolutionReports Other'sPerceptions
Expresses Own
Opinion & Feeling
Strategy &Interaction
Skills
_Previews MethodOf Responding
Uses Transitionsto Start, Maintain& End Interactions
_Describes SpecificCultural /Contextual
Conditions_HighlightsOccurrences inChronological Order
_Gives RelevantExamples & DetailsDefines RelevantCultural/ContextualWords & Phrases
_SummarizesReasoning Process
Receptive &Evaluative
Skills
Gives PertinantOral Responses to
Spoken & Visual
Messages
__Clarifies AttitudeCorresponding withOther's Spoken &
Visual Messages
Provides CriticalEvaluation of Own
& Other's Spoken
& Visual Messages
_Explains OwnInterpretation ofMessage Function
& Intention_Explains Method
of Using Other'sInterpretation ofMessage Function
& Intention
Verbal &Nonverbal
Skills
Encodes & Speaks
English Audibly
,Avoids GrossMispronunciationof Vowel &Consonant Sounds
Uses GrammaticalContinuity &ExplicitlyArticulates
Word Endings
Conveys Meaningof Emphasized
Syllables
Avoids VagueWords, Phrases, &
Abrupt Responses_Avoids Distractive
Verbal & Nonverbal
Behaviors_Balances Use of
Time for RelationshipMaintenance Purposes
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
7 Criteria x 3 Competencies-21 points5 Criteria x 1 Competency= 5 Points
Total Possible 26 PointsExample: 26-12-14/4-3.5-Proficient
Total Points-26- ______/4 Score
Rating Scale: 5-Effective 4-Proficient 3-Functional 2-At-Risk 1-Non English Speaker
ACCESSElementary School Oral Performance (c) by N. L. Flores, 1996 for the SCA
Exammee's responses may be written in the space below;
Tecichine OealCommunication in
Geodes K-13Ann L. Chaney and Tamara L. BurkAllyn and Bacon, 1998
Multiculturalism and InterculturalCommunicationAccording to Flores (1993), intercultural communicators collaborate to build mean-
ing. Collaboration occurs when the source and the receiver give each other addi-
tional information or offer appropriate verbal and nonverbal feedback. The extra
information helps the other person redefine, or reinterpret, the original message.Two important forms of feedback are (1) paraphrasing how the message has beeninterpreted, so that the speaker has an opportunity to redefine the message; and
(2) providing follow-up information, if necessary, to indicate confusion or a lack of
understanding.In addition to valuing difference in culture, a communication-friendly class-
room allows opportunity for cultural collaboration. Exhibit 2.1 provides a closer
look at the cultural collaboration and redefinition process. You will notice that it
uses elements of the SMCR model (sourcemessagechannelreceiver) introducedin Chapter 1.
The Importance of a Communication-Friendly Classroom
Exhibit 2.1 Cultural Collaboration and Redefinition Process
Context. The appropriate words, grammar, examples, and actions that are expectedbecause of the occasion, time, place, and relationship of the participants in theinteraction. In intercultural communication situations, factors such as culturalnorms and fields of experience may be key to determining context.
Source. The person or group that originates the message or speech. In interculturalcommunication, the source makes an initial effort to define a meaningful messageby using four communication skills:
1. Thinking/feeling to determine the purpose of the communication2. Selecting symbols to use in sending the message3. Analyzing and adapting to the receiver4. Sending the message
Message. The intended message is the set of verbal and nonverbal symbols used bythe source to further the purpose of the communication. Often, however, thesource may send unintentional messages that may impede understanding. Thisproblem may occur frequently in intercultural communication, where symbolmeanings, cultural norms, and field of experience are likely to differ greatly. Othercommunication barriers arising from various forms of interference (describedbelow) can also obscure the meaning of an intended message.
When a source recognizes that the receiver has not understood the intendedmessage, he or she must redefine, or clarify, the message using the following three
communication skills:
1. Use ideas and beliefs that are likely to mean something to the receiver.
2. Use an arrangement of examples, reasons, grammar, pronunciation, and non-verbal behavior that will be perceived as logical by the receiver.
3. Adjust the message as necessary by alternating symbols for ideas and feelings.
Channel. The different ways a verbal or nonverbal message can be sent to the receiver.By sight (nonverbal) and by sound (verbal).
(continued)
3 5 3 BEST COPY AVAILABLE
reaching C'ealCommunication inGeodes 1-<-8Ann L. Chaney and Tamara L. BurkAllyn and Bacon, 1998
CHAPTER 2
Exhibit 2.1 Continued
Receiver. The person(s) for whom the message is intended. The receiver collaborateswith the source to build and share meaning by:
1. Physically sensing the message (hearing and/or seeing).2. Interpretingmaking sense of the message.3. Evaluating the message to determine a response. Based on the interpretation
of the message, the receiver formulates a purpose in responding to themessage.
4. Responding to the message.
In defining a response to a message, the receiver employs the samecommunication skills that are used by the source in defining the original message:
using thoughts and feelings to determine the purpose of the communica-tionselecting symbols to use in the messageadapting the symbols so that they are meaningful to the other person, andthenactually delivering the message.
If the source does not accept the response as leading to an understanding, thereceiver must reinterpret the original message and redefine the response to thatmessage. In doing so, the receiver uses the following skills:
anticipating the ideas and beliefs that will be meaningful to the otherperson;using a logical arrangement of examples, reasons, grammar, pronunciation,and nonverbal behavior; andalternating symbols for ideas and feelings, as necessary, to build a sharedunderstanding.
Interference. Barriers to interpretation of the intended message. There are threeprimary types of interference:
1. external interferencephysical stimuli that draw the receiver's attention awayfrom the message;
2. internal interferencepsychological stimuli that distract the receiver, such as,mood; field of experience; and cultural beliefs, values, or attitudes; and
3. semantic interferencemispronunciation or inappropriate vocabulary.
Sometimes words or nonverbal behaviors can have a variety of meanings, whichacts as interference.
Adapted and reprinted with permission of N. L. Flores (1993, p. 35).
36
BEST COPY AVAILABLE
I ACCESS-HS:lntercultural Assessment of CommunicationCompetency & English Speaking Skills-High School Edition(c) Norma Landa Flores, 1995
Directions: Look at the communication interactions on this page so that you can notice the different processesand procedures high school students use to do their school, sports, work or family tasks in theirculturally diverse speaking and listening situations.
..4101L-
Directions: Listen to these 3 questions and then answer the 3 questions by talking to the interviewer.
Ql: What task do you know how to do that might involve you in a culturally diverse high school studentspeaking and listening situation?
Q2: What kind of actions or procedures would you have to use in order to complete the task safely andeffectively?
Q3: Why do you think that your way of getting your task done will be beneficial to all of the people involved inthe culturally diverse speaking and listening situation?
BEST COPY AVAILABLE 373
Inte
rcul
tura
l Ass
essm
ent o
f C
omm
unic
atio
n C
ompe
tenc
yc
Eng
lish
Spea
king
Ski
ffs
-510
Sch
ool.
Exa
min
ee's
Las
t Nam
e:
Exa
min
er:
Exa
min
er:
Exa
min
ee's
Firs
t Nam
e.I.D
.#
Look
at t
he c
omm
unic
atio
n in
tera
ctio
ns o
n th
is p
age
so th
atyo
u ca
n no
tice
the
diffe
rent
pro
cess
es a
nd p
roce
dure
s hi
gh
scho
ol s
tude
nts
use
to d
o th
eir
scho
ol, s
port
s, w
ork
or fa
mily
task
s In
thei
r cu
ltura
lly a
vers
e sp
eaki
ng &
list
enin
g si
tuat
ions
.
Mak
e be
lieve
that
you
are
at a
col
lege
ent
ranc
e ex
amin
atio
nan
d ar
e be
ing
inte
rvie
wed
abo
ut th
e m
ajor
that
inte
rest
s yo
u.A
nsw
er th
ese
ques
tions
abo
ut th
e m
ajor
that
inte
rest
s yo
u.
Exa
min
erQ
:W
hat t
ask
do y
ou k
now
how
to d
o th
at m
ight
Invo
lve
you
In a
cultu
rally
div
erse
H.S
. stu
dent
spe
akin
g &
list
enin
g si
tuat
ion?
Exa
min
erQ
:W
hat k
ind
of a
ctio
ns o
r pr
oced
ures
wou
ld y
ou h
ave
to u
se In
orde
r to
com
plet
e th
e ta
sk s
afel
y an
d ef
fect
ivel
y?
Exa
min
erQ
:W
hy d
o yo
u th
ink
that
you
r w
ay o
f get
ting
the
task
don
e w
illbe
ben
efid
al to
al o
f the
peo
ple
invo
lved
In th
e cu
ltura
llydi
vers
e sp
eaki
ng a
nd li
sten
ing
situ
atio
n?
Com
pete
ncie
s 8
Crit
eria
Exa
min
ee's
res
pons
es m
ay b
e w
ritte
n in
the
spac
e be
low
:
One
:T
wo
Thr
ee:
Fou
r:F
ive:
Shc
Sev
en:
(Pur
pose
/Foc
us)
(Org
aniz
atio
n)(E
xam
ples
)(V
ocab
ular
y/G
ram
mar
)(P
ronu
ncia
tion/
Em
phas
is)
(Non
verb
al C
ongr
uenc
y)(U
se o
f Tim
e A
llotte
d)P
arap
hras
es O
ther
's P
urp.
_Pre
view
s B
hvrs
._R
epor
ts M
on. B
ehvr
s._.
_Spe
aks
Eng
lish
_Is
Aud
ibe/
Enc
odes
_Giv
es O
ral R
espo
nses
_Avo
ids
Pau
ses
_Hig
hlig
hts
Oth
er's
Idea
__U
ses
Tra
nsiti
ons
_Des
crib
es C
onte
xt C
ond.
_Is
Acc
urat
e/P
reds
e_U
ses
Sta
ndar
d V
owel
to A
ural
Pro
mpt
s_A
void
s E
xten
sive
Dis
clos
es Q
ualif
icat
ions
__G
ives
Spe
cific
s_D
efin
es T
ech.
Ter
ms
in L
inki
ng W
ords
and
Phr
ases
to Q
uest
ions
_Use
s C
ontin
uity
and
Con
sona
nt S
ound
sC
larif
ies
Atti
tude
Non
-Per
tinen
t Res
pons
es_R
espo
nds
to Q
uest
ion
_Hig
hlig
hts
Inst
r.R
epor
ts O
ther
's P
erce
p.E
xplic
itly
Art
icul
ates
Cor
resp
ondi
ng w
ith_,
_Avo
ids
Abr
uptn
ess
Foc
uses
On
Dire
ctio
nsS
umm
ariz
esG
ives
Ow
n O
pini
onW
ord
End
ings
Vis
ual P
rom
pts
__A
void
s F
alla
ciou
sG
ives
Viv
id D
etai
s_C
onve
ys M
eani
ng o
f_D
iscl
oses
Cul
. Per
cep.
Rea
soni
ng P
roce
ss
Rel
evan
t to
Oth
erE
mph
asiz
ed S
ylla
bles
Rei
nfor
ces
Cul
. Val
ue_S
uffic
ient
ly B
alan
ces
Use
of
_Avo
ids
Vag
ue T
erm
sC
omm
unic
ates
Mes
sage
Avo
ids
Dis
trac
tive
Tim
e fo
r E
ach
Res
pons
e in
Fun
ctio
n an
d In
tent
ion
Ver
bal/N
onve
rbal
Bhv
rR
elat
ion
to M
utua
l Pur
pose
s0
12
3 4
50
12
3 4
50
12
3 4
50
12
34
50
12
34
50
12
3 4
50
12
34
5
5 cr
iteria
x 7
com
pete
ncie
s -3
5 po
ints
exp:
35-8
.27/
7.23
.859
6mP
rofid
ent
Rat
ing
Sca
le:
5-E
ffect
ive
4.P
rofld
ent
3-F
unct
iona
l2-
At-
Ris
k
Tot
al p
ossi
ble
poin
ts-3
5-__
_.__
_/7_
scor
e
1- R
estr
icte
d
3ci
I AC
CE
SS
-HS
0 b
y N
orm
a Li
nda
Sor
es, 1
994
Dep
artm
ent o
f Spe
ech
Com
mun
icat
ion,
Gol
den
Wes
t Col
lege
, Hun
tingt
on B
each
, CA
4R
ES
T C
OP
Y A
VA
ILA
BLE
2
I ACCESS:intercultural Assessment of CommunicationCompetency & English Speaking Skills
Directions:Look at the communication interactions on this page so that you can notice the various processespeople use to do their work-related tasks in their culturally diverse job situations.
Q:
Q:
Q:
What kind of work do you know how to do that might involve you in a culturally diverse job situation?
What kind of actions or procedures would you have to use in order to get your job done safely andeffectively?
Why do you think that your way of getting the job done will be beneficial to all of the people involved inthe culturally diverse job situation?
39
Inte
rcul
tura
l Ass
essm
ent o
f C
omm
unic
atio
n C
ompe
tenc
y &
Eng
lish
Spea
kins
SK
ills
Exa
min
ee's
Las
t Nam
e:
Exa
min
er:
Exa
min
er:
Exa
min
ee's
Firs
t Nam
e:I 0
If
Look
at t
he c
omm
unic
atio
n in
tera
ctio
ns o
n th
is p
age
so th
at
you
can
notic
e th
e va
rious
pro
cess
es p
eopl
e us
e to
do
thei
r
wor
k-re
late
d ta
sks
In th
eir
cultu
rally
div
erse
job
situ
atio
ns.
Mak
e be
lieve
that
you
are
at a
job
inte
rvie
w a
bout
the
kind
of w
ork
that
Inte
rest
s yo
u an
d an
swer
the
follo
win
gqu
estio
ns a
bout
you
r ki
nd o
f wor
k.
Exa
min
erQ
:W
hat k
ind
of w
ork
do y
ou k
now
how
to d
o th
atm
ight
invo
lve
you
in a
cul
tura
lly d
iver
se s
ituat
ion?
Exa
min
erQ
:W
hat k
ind
of a
ctio
ns o
r pr
oced
ures
wou
ld y
ou h
ave
to u
sein
ord
er to
get
you
r jo
b do
ne s
afet
y an
d ef
fect
ivel
y?
Exa
min
erQ
:
Com
pete
ncie
s &
Crit
eria
Why
do
you
thin
k th
at y
our
way
of g
ettin
g th
e jo
bdo
ne w
ill b
e be
nefic
ial t
o al
l of t
he p
eopl
e in
volv
edin
the
cultu
rally
div
erse
job
situ
atio
n?
Exa
min
ee's
res
pons
es m
ay b
e w
ritte
nin
the
spac
e be
low
:
One
:T
wo:
Thr
ee:
Fou
r.F
ive:
Six
:S
even
:
(Pur
pose
/Foc
us)
(Org
aniz
atio
n)(E
xam
ples
)(V
ocab
ular
y/G
ram
mar
)(P
ronu
ncia
tion/
Em
phas
isi
(Non
verb
al C
ongr
uenc
y)(U
se o
f Tim
e A
llotte
d)
__P
arap
hras
es O
ther
's P
urp.
_Pre
view
s B
hvrs
._R
epor
ts C
hron
. Beh
vrs.
_Spe
aks
Eng
lish
Is A
uckb
e/E
ncod
es_G
ives
Ora
l Res
pons
es__
Avo
ids
Pau
ses
__H
ighl
ight
s O
ther
's Id
ea__
Use
s T
rans
ition
sD
escr
ibes
Con
text
Con
d._I
s A
ccur
ate/
Pre
cise
__U
ses
Sta
ndar
d V
owel
to A
ural
Pro
mpt
s__
Avo
ids
Ext
ensi
ve
__D
iscl
oses
Qua
lific
atio
ns__
Giv
es S
peci
fics
__D
efin
es T
ech.
Ter
ms
in L
inki
ng W
ords
and
and
Con
sona
nt S
ound
s__
Cla
rifie
s A
ttitu
deN
on-P
ertin
ent R
espo
nses
__R
espo
nds
to Q
uest
ion
__H
ighl
ight
s In
str.
_Rep
orts
Oth
er's
Per
cep.
Phr
ases
to Q
uest
ions
__E
xplic
itly
Art
icul
ates
Cor
resp
ondi
ng w
ith_A
void
s A
brup
tnes
s
__F
ocus
es O
n D
irect
ions
__S
umm
ariz
es_G
ives
Ow
n O
pini
on_U
ses
Con
tinui
ty__
Giv
es V
ivid
Det
ails
Wor
d E
ndin
gs
_Con
veys
Mea
ning
of
Vis
ual P
rom
pts
_Dis
clos
es C
ul. P
erce
p.__
Avo
ids
Fal
laci
ous
Rea
soni
ng P
roce
ss
_Suf
ficie
ntly
Bal
ance
s U
se o
fR
elev
ant t
o O
ther
Em
phas
ized
Syl
labl
es_R
einf
orce
s C
ul. V
alue
__A
void
s V
ague
Ter
ms
__C
oMm
unic
ates
Mes
sage
__A
void
s D
istr
activ
eT
ime
for
Eac
h R
espo
nse
in
Fun
ctio
n an
d In
tent
ion
Ver
bal/N
onve
rbal
Bhv
rR
elat
ion
to M
utua
l Pur
pose
s
0 1
2 3
4 5
0 '1
2 3
45
0 1
23
4 5
0 1
23
45
0 1
23
45
0 1
23
45
0 1
23
45
crite
ria x
7 c
ompe
tend
es.3
5 pa
nts
exp:
35 -
8 -2
7 /7
.3.8
5%-
Pro
ficie
nt
Rat
ing
Sca
le:
5-E
ffect
ive
4-P
rofic
ient
3...F
unct
iona
l2=
At-
Ris
k
I AC
CE
SS
(3
by N
orm
a La
nda
Flo
res,
199
4 D
epar
tmen
t of S
peec
h C
omm
unic
atio
n, G
olde
n W
est
Col
lege
, Hun
tingt
on B
each
, CA
A 7
,
12C
CT
PA
DV
Al/A
ll A
PI r
Tot
al p
ossi
ble
poin
ts.3
5-__
_.__
_/7_
__sc
ore
1 ',R
estr
ict e
d
43
GOLDEN WEST COLLEGE
CONTENT REVIEW FORM
Request for () 'Prerequisite Corequisite Advisory
TARGET COURSE (Name and Number): SfPC.CC. A- Covv 0 (.0 CFaymerly sfdi°1°Course for which the prerequisite, corequisite or advisory is proposed
Content review requires identification of ALL of the following by the discipline/department faculty of therespective course(s):
1. Before entering the target course the student should be able to:List skills, attitudes. competencies. and or knowledge.
SEE ATTACHED
2. Upon completion of the prerequisite, corequisite, advisory course, the student should be able to:List skills, attitudes. competencies and or knowledge.
SEE ATTACHED
3. Compare the entry skills required for the target course (#1) with the exit skills of the requestedprerequisite, corequisite, advisory (#2). If there is a significant match, it supports the prerequisite,corequisite or advisory are necessary for student success in the targeted course.
SEE ATTACHED
4. Upon completion of the target course, the student should be able to:List skills. attitudes. competencies and/or knowledge.
CCI ACTION:
SEE ATTACHED
Approved Denied Date:
NOTE: Content Review is deferred to the program review year for the respective disciplines for the following:Prerequisite is required by statute or regulation'Prerequisite is part of a closely related lecture-laboratory course pairing within a discipline
41 A17
TA
RG
ET
CO
UR
SE
:S
PE
EC
H C
OM
MU
NIC
AT
ION
060
-IN
TE
RM
ED
IAT
E P
RO
NU
NC
IAT
ION
Adv
isor
y C
ours
e:C
ompl
etio
n of
ES
L 03
3 (
enro
llmen
tin
ES
L 04
1/04
2 st
rong
lyen
cour
aged
)
EN
TR
Y L
EV
EL
SK
ILLS
need
ed b
efor
e en
teri
ngta
rget
cou
rse:
Cou
rse:
Sp
Com
060
Inte
rmed
iate
Pro
nunc
iatio
n(F
unct
iona
l Com
mun
icat
ion
Em
phas
is)
1. T
he s
tude
nt h
as a
lim
ited
degr
eeof
abi
lity
in u
nder
stan
ding
pron
unci
atio
n ap
preh
ensi
onan
d ca
n id
entif
y si
tuat
ions
whe
nhe
/she
mig
ht h
ave
to in
tera
ct to
ask
ques
tions
.
2. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
ask
and
answ
er q
uest
ions
abou
t rea
ding
san
d sp
oken
expr
essi
ons.
3. T
he s
tude
nt h
as a
lim
ited
degr
eeof
abi
lity
in u
nder
stan
ding
how
tocl
arify
pron
unci
atio
nm
isun
ders
tand
ings
by a
skin
gqu
estio
ns to
sel
ect a
ppro
pria
tevo
wel
and
con
sona
nt p
ronu
ncia
tion.
45
EX
IT L
EV
EL
SK
ILL
Sac
quir
ed u
pon
com
plet
ion
of ta
rget
cou
rse:
Cou
rse:
ESL
033
ES
L Li
sten
ing/
Spe
akin
g, L
evel
3
1. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill le
arn
how
tore
cogn
ize
pron
unci
atio
npa
ttern
s fo
r ga
inin
g in
form
atio
nin
sim
ple
spea
king
situ
atio
ns s
uch
as in
the
pron
unci
atio
n ne
eded
whe
n op
enin
g a
bank
acc
ount
and
inpo
lite
conv
ersa
tions
.
2. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill le
arn
how
toas
k an
d an
swer
que
stio
nsab
out c
lass
wor
k, r
eadi
ngs,
and
expr
essi
ons.
3. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill le
arn
how
tore
cogn
ize
and
use
limite
d co
ntro
l iin
pro
noun
cing
ofte
n co
nfus
edsi
mpl
e w
ords
by
havi
ng h
is/h
erpr
onun
ciat
ion
of v
owel
sou
nds
ingr
oups
and
end
con
sona
nt c
lust
ers
corr
ecte
d.
Com
pari
son
of e
ntry
ski
llsfo
r ta
rget
cou
rse
with
exi
tsk
ills
of a
dvis
ory
cour
se:
Sign
ific
ant M
atch
?
EX
IT L
EV
EL
SK
ILL
Sac
quir
ed u
pon
com
plet
ion
of ta
rget
cou
rse:
Cou
rse:
Sp
Cor
n 06
0In
term
edia
te P
ronu
ncia
tion
(Fun
ctio
nal C
omm
unic
atio
n E
mph
asis
)
1. Y
ES
skill
des
crip
tors
mat
ch1.
The
stu
dent
has
an
intr
oduc
tory
degr
ee o
f abi
lity
in u
nder
stan
ding
inte
rcul
tura
l pro
nunc
iatio
nap
preh
ensi
on a
nd c
an id
entif
yco
ntex
ts w
hen
he/s
he m
ight
hav
eto
inte
ract
to a
sk q
uest
ions
tocl
arify
ver
bal a
nd n
onve
rbal
mis
unde
rsta
ndin
gs.
2. Y
ES
- s
kill
desc
ripto
rs m
atch
2. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
verb
ally
ask
and
ans
wer
ques
tions
abo
ut fu
nctio
nal
com
mun
icat
ion
cont
exts
,pr
onun
ciat
ion
read
ings
&or
alin
tera
ctio
ns.
3. Y
ES
skill
des
crip
tors
mat
ch3.
The
stu
dent
can
inte
ract
tocl
arify
pron
unci
atio
nm
isun
ders
tand
ings
at a
nin
trod
ucto
ry d
egre
e of
abi
lity
by v
erba
lly p
arap
hras
ing,
and
aski
ng o
pen
ques
tions
bef
ore
sele
ctin
g al
tern
ate
exam
ples
and
soun
ds to
pro
noun
ce in
func
tiona
lco
mm
unic
atio
n co
ntex
ts.
46
[TAR
GE
T C
OU
RS
E:
SP
EE
CH
CO
MM
UN
ICA
TIO
N 0
60 -
INT
ER
ME
DIA
TE
PR
ON
UN
CIA
TIO
N
Adv
isor
y C
ours
e:C
ompl
etio
n of
ES
L 03
3 (e
nrol
lmen
t in
ES
L 04
1/04
2 st
rong
ly e
ncou
rage
d)
EN
TR
Y L
EV
EL
SK
ILL
Sne
eded
bef
ore
ente
ring
targ
et c
ours
e:
Cou
rse:
Sp
Com
060
Inte
rmed
iate
Pro
nunc
iatio
n(F
unct
iona
l Com
mun
icat
ion
Em
phas
is)
4. T
he s
tude
nt h
as a
lim
ited
degr
eeof
abi
lity
in u
nder
stan
ding
how
toar
ticul
ate
Sta
ndar
d A
mer
ican
Eng
lish
spok
en g
ram
mar
inve
rbs,
tens
es, a
nd d
escr
iptiv
eph
rase
s.
5. T
he s
tude
nt h
as a
lim
ited
degr
eeof
abi
lity
in u
nder
stan
ding
how
toen
unci
ate
Sta
ndar
d A
mer
ican
Eng
lish
to lo
gica
lly a
ndde
scrip
tivel
ygi
ve d
irect
ions
.
6. T
he s
tude
nt h
as a
lim
ited
degr
eeof
abi
lity
in u
nder
stan
ding
how
tous
e S
tand
ard
Am
eric
an E
nglis
h to
emph
asiz
e pu
rpos
e, s
tres
s an
din
tona
tion
to c
onve
yor
gani
zed
info
rmat
ion
incl
udin
gsu
bord
inat
ion
of d
etai
ls.
47
EX
IT L
EV
EL
SK
ILL
Sac
quir
ed u
pon
com
plet
ion
of a
dvis
ory
cour
se:
Cou
rse:
ESL
033
ES
L Li
sten
ing/
Spe
akin
g, L
evel
3
4. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
use
Eng
lish
as a
Sec
ond
Lang
uage
spok
en g
ram
mar
to p
rono
unce
verb
s, te
nses
and
mod
als
in s
ongs
,ex
erci
ses,
and
brie
f con
vers
atio
ns.
5. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
pron
ounc
e E
nglis
h as
a S
econ
dLa
ngua
ge u
sing
pre
posi
tiona
lsp
eech
pat
tern
s gi
ving
dire
ctio
ns to
pla
ces
on o
r ne
arca
mpu
s.
6. U
sing
Eng
lish
as a
Sec
ond
Lang
uage
the
stud
ent w
ill b
e ab
le to
use
stre
ss, p
itch,
and
junc
ture
toco
nvey
mea
ning
in b
rief,
orga
nize
d su
mm
arie
s , u
sing
narr
ativ
e se
quen
ce, f
rom
sto
ries
perf
orm
ed li
ve, h
eard
or
wat
ched
on te
levi
sion
.
Com
pari
son
of e
ntry
ski
llsE
XIT
LE
VE
L S
KIL
LS
fort
arge
tcou
rse
with
exi
tac
quir
ed u
pon
com
plet
ion
skill
ls o
f ad
viso
ry c
ours
e:of
targ
et c
ours
e:
Sign
ific
ant M
atch
?
4. Y
ES
skill
des
crip
tor
mat
ch
5. Y
essk
ill d
escr
ipto
rs m
atch
6. Y
ES
skill
des
crip
tors
mat
ch
Cou
rse:
Sp
Com
060
Inte
rmed
iate
Pro
nunc
iatio
n(F
unct
iona
l Com
mun
icat
ion
Em
phas
is)
4. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
artic
ulat
e S
tand
ard
Am
eric
anE
nglis
h sp
oken
gra
mm
ar in
tens
es, p
lura
ls, p
osse
ssiv
es, a
ndth
ird p
erso
n si
ngul
ar w
ord
endi
ngs
of fu
nctio
nal o
ral c
omm
unic
atio
nm
essa
ges.
5. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
enun
ciat
e S
tand
ard
Am
eric
anE
nglis
h to
logi
cally
and
desc
riptiv
ely
pres
ent a
func
tiona
l spe
ech
desc
ribin
gan
d ex
plai
ning
how
, whe
re a
nd w
hyto
find
an
obje
ct o
r pr
oduc
t.
6. U
sing
Sta
ndar
d A
mer
ican
Eng
lish
the
stud
ent w
ill b
e ab
le to
emph
asiz
e pu
rpos
e, s
ylla
bles
,st
ress
, and
into
natio
n in
ora
lm
essa
ges
to c
onve
y in
form
atio
nin
out
lined
form
focu
sing
on
subo
rdin
ated
det
ails
and
an
oral
requ
est f
or li
sten
er fe
edba
ck.
48
TA
RG
ET
CO
UR
SE:
SP
EE
CH
CO
MM
UN
ICA
TIO
N06
0IN
TE
RM
ED
IAT
E P
RO
NU
NC
IAT
ION
Adv
isor
y C
ours
e:C
ompl
etio
n of
ES
L 03
3 (e
nrol
lmen
t in
ES
L 04
1/04
2 st
rong
ly e
ncou
rage
d)
EN
TR
Y L
EV
EL
SK
ILL
Sne
eded
bef
ore
ente
ring
targ
et c
ours
e:
Cou
rse:
Sp
Com
060
Inte
rmed
iate
Pro
nunc
iatio
n(F
unct
iona
l Com
mun
icat
ion
Em
phas
is)
7. T
he s
tude
nt h
as a
lim
ited
degr
eeof
abi
lity
in u
nder
stan
ding
how
tous
e S
tand
ard
Am
eric
an E
nglis
h to
brie
fly m
aint
ain
ave
rbal
conv
ersa
tion
by a
skin
g an
dan
swer
ing
othe
r's q
uest
ions
.
8. T
he s
tude
nt h
as a
lim
ited
degr
eeof
abi
lity
in u
nder
stan
ding
how
tore
spon
d to
an
inte
rvie
wer
'squ
estio
ns.
9. T
he s
tude
nt h
as a
lim
ited
degr
eeof
abi
lity
in u
nder
stan
ding
how
toin
tera
ct w
ith s
peak
ers
ofS
tand
ard
Am
eric
an E
nglis
h,by
witi
ng r
epon
ses
to r
ecor
ded
Eng
lish
as a
Sec
ond
Lang
uage
wor
dsph
rase
s an
d m
essa
ges
in th
eG
WC
com
mun
icat
ion
labs
.
4-9-
EX
IT L
EV
EL
SK
ILL
Sac
quir
ed u
pon
com
plet
ion
of a
dvis
ory
cour
se:
Cou
rse:
ESL
033
ES
L Li
sten
ing/
Spe
akin
g, L
evel
3
7. U
sing
Eng
lish
as a
Sec
ond
Lang
uage
the
stud
ent w
ill b
e ab
le to
prac
tice
spea
king
insi
mpl
eco
nver
satio
ns,
will
lear
n ho
wto
par
ticip
ate
in w
ork
grou
ps, a
ndw
ill p
ract
ice
the
skill
s of
pol
iteco
nver
satio
n.
8. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill b
e in
trod
uced
to w
ays
of u
nder
stan
ding
how
tore
spon
d to
sim
ple
requ
ests
,in
stru
ctio
ns, c
omm
ands
and
ques
tions
, and
will
lear
n to
resp
ond
polit
ely
and
com
plet
ely.
9. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
resp
ond
to a
udia
l/vis
ual
Eng
lish
as a
Sec
ond
Lang
uage
in th
e E
SL
Lab
whe
neve
r au
dial
/vi
sual
med
ia is
ava
ilabl
e.
Com
pari
son
of e
ntry
ski
llsfo
r ta
rget
cou
rse
with
exi
tsk
ills
of a
dvis
ory
cour
se:
Sig
nific
antM
atch
?
7. Y
ES
skill
des
crip
tors
mat
ch
8. Y
ES
- s
kill
desc
ripto
rs m
atch
9. N
O -
ski
ll de
scrip
tors
mat
chfo
r sy
stem
atic
eva
luat
ion
ofst
uden
t's in
tera
ctio
nw
ithsp
eake
rs o
f Sta
ndar
dA
mer
ican
Eng
lish.
EX
IT L
EV
EL
SK
ILL
Sac
quir
ed u
pon
com
plet
ion
of ta
rget
cou
rse:
Cou
rse:
Sp
Com
060
Inte
rmed
iate
Pro
nunc
iatio
n(F
unct
iona
l Com
mun
icat
ion
Em
phas
is)
7. U
sing
Sta
ndar
d A
mer
ican
Eng
lish
the
stud
ent w
ill b
e ab
le to
brie
fly m
aint
ain
ave
rbal
dial
ogue
by
intr
oduc
ing
self
toot
hers
, dis
clos
ing
pron
unci
atio
nap
preh
ensi
on, a
nd r
eque
stin
g or
alfe
edba
ck fr
om li
sten
ers.
8. T
he s
tude
nt h
as a
n in
trod
ucto
ryde
gree
of a
bilit
y in
pra
ctic
ing
how
to r
espo
nd to
an
inte
rvie
wer
's q
uest
ions
usin
gat
tend
ing
beha
vior
s an
d ve
rbal
lypa
raph
rasi
ng, a
t an
inte
rmed
iate
pron
unci
atio
n le
vel o
f fun
ctio
nal
com
mun
icat
ion
skill
s.
9. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
verb
ally
and
non
verb
ally
inte
ract
with
spe
aker
s of
Sta
ndar
d A
mer
ican
Eng
lish,
at a
n in
term
edia
te p
ronu
ncia
tion
leve
l of f
unct
iona
l com
mun
icat
ion
skill
s, in
the
GW
C c
omm
unic
atio
nla
bs.
50
Gol
den
Wes
t Col
lege
Spe
ech
Coh
ori u
nica
/ion
Pro
gram
Peo
noun
cing
, Spe
akin
g, a
nd L
iste
ning
Ski
lls S
tand
cled
s(D
eriv
ed fr
om th
e 19
97 P
rogr
am a
nd C
onte
nt R
evie
w c
ondu
cted
by
the
Gol
den
Wes
t Col
lege
Spe
ech
Com
mun
icat
ion
Dep
artm
ent,
Hun
tingt
on B
each
, CA
.)
Ski
lls N
eede
d B
efor
e E
nter
ing
Sp
Cor
n 02
0
1. T
he s
tude
nt s
houl
d ha
ve a
lim
ited
degr
ee o
f abi
lity
in u
nder
stan
ding
pron
unci
atio
n ap
preh
ensi
on a
nd c
an id
entif
ysi
tuat
ions
whe
n he
/she
mig
ht h
ave
toin
tera
ct to
ask
que
stio
ns.
2. T
he s
tude
nt s
houl
d be
abl
e to
ask
and
answ
er q
uest
ions
abo
ut r
eadi
ngs
and
spok
en e
xpre
ssio
ns.
3. T
he s
tude
nt s
houl
d ha
ve a
lim
ited
degr
eeof
abi
lity
in u
nder
stan
ding
how
to c
larif
ypr
onun
ciat
ion
mis
unde
rsta
ndin
gs b
y as
king
ques
tions
to s
elec
t app
ropr
iate
vow
el a
ndco
nson
ant p
ronu
ncia
tion.
4. T
he s
tude
nt s
houl
d ha
ve a
lim
ited
degr
eeof
abi
lity
in u
ders
tand
ing
how
to a
rtic
ulat
eS
tand
ard
Am
eric
an E
nglis
h sp
oken
gra
mm
arin
ver
bs, t
ense
s, a
nd d
escr
iptiv
e ph
rase
s.
5. T
he s
tude
nt s
houl
d ha
ve a
lim
ited
degr
eeof
abi
lity
in u
nder
stan
ding
how
to e
nunc
iate
Sta
ndar
d A
mer
ican
Eng
lish
to lo
gica
lly a
ndde
scrip
tivel
y gi
ve d
irect
ions
.
6. T
he s
tude
nt s
houl
d ha
ve a
lim
ited
degr
eeof
abi
lity
in u
nder
stan
ding
how
to u
seS
tand
ard
Am
eric
an E
nglis
h to
em
phas
ize
purp
ose,
str
ess
and
into
natio
n to
con
vey
orga
nize
d in
form
atio
n in
clud
ing
subo
rdin
atio
nof
det
ails
.
Ski
lls A
cqui
red
Upo
n C
ompl
etio
n of
Sp
Com
020
1. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill h
ave
an in
trod
ucto
ry d
egre
eof
abi
lity
in u
nder
stan
ding
inte
rcul
tura
lpr
onun
ciat
ion
appr
ehen
sion
and
can
iden
tify
cont
exts
whe
n he
/she
mig
ht h
ave
to in
tera
ctto
ask
que
stio
ns to
cla
rify
verb
al a
ndno
nver
bal m
isun
ders
tand
ings
.
2. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
ver
bally
ask
and
answ
er q
uest
ions
abo
ut fu
nctio
nal
com
mun
icat
ion
cont
exts
, pro
nunc
iatio
nan
d or
al in
tera
ctio
ns.
3. T
he s
tude
nt c
an in
tera
ct to
cla
rify
pron
unci
atio
n m
isun
ders
tand
ings
at a
nin
trod
ucto
ry d
egre
e of
abi
lity
by v
erba
llypa
raph
rasi
ng, a
nd a
skin
g op
en q
uest
ions
bef
ore
sele
ctin
g al
tern
ate
exam
ples
and
sou
nds
topr
onou
nce
in fu
nctio
nal c
omm
unic
atio
n co
ntex
ts
4. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
art
icul
ate
Sta
ndar
d A
mer
ican
Eng
lish
spok
en g
ram
mar
in te
nses
, plu
rals
, pos
sess
ives
, and
third
pers
on s
ingu
lar
wor
d en
ding
s of
func
tiona
lor
al c
omm
unic
atio
n m
essa
ges.
5. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
enu
ncia
teS
tand
ard
Am
eric
an E
nglis
h to
logi
cally
and
desc
riptiv
ely
pres
ent a
func
tiona
l spe
ech
desc
ribin
g an
d ex
plai
ning
how
, whe
re a
ndw
hy to
find
an
obje
ct o
r pr
oduc
t.
6. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
use
Sta
ndar
dA
mer
ican
Eng
lish
to e
mph
asiz
e pu
rpos
e,
sylla
bles
, str
ess,
and
into
natio
n in
ora
lm
essa
ges
to c
onve
y in
form
atio
n in
out
lined
form
focu
sing
on
subo
rdin
ated
det
ails
and
an o
ral r
eque
st fo
r lis
tene
r fe
edba
ck.
p.45
Ski
lls N
eede
d B
efor
e E
nter
ing
Sp
Cor
n 02
0S
kills
Acq
uire
d U
pon
Com
plet
ion
of S
p C
orn
02Q
7. T
he s
tude
nt s
houl
d ha
ve a
lim
ited
degr
eeof
abi
lity
in u
nder
stan
ding
how
to u
seS
tand
ard
Am
eric
an E
nglis
h to
brie
flym
aint
ain
a ve
rbal
con
vers
atio
n by
ask
ing
and
answ
erin
g ot
her's
que
stio
ns.
8. T
he s
tude
nt s
houl
d ha
ve a
lim
ited
degr
eeof
abi
lity
in u
nder
stan
ding
how
to r
espo
ndto
an
inte
rvie
wer
's q
uest
ions
.
9. T
he s
tude
nt s
houl
d ha
ve a
lim
ited
degr
eeof
abi
lity
in u
nder
stan
ding
how
to in
tera
ctw
ith S
peak
ers
of S
tand
ard
Am
eric
an E
nglis
hby
writ
ing
resp
onse
s to
rec
orde
d E
nglis
has
a S
econ
d La
ngua
ge w
ords
, phr
ases
and
mes
sage
s in
the
GW
C c
omm
unic
atio
n la
bs.
7. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
use
Sta
ndar
dA
mer
ican
Eng
lish
to b
riefly
mai
ntai
n a
verb
aldi
alog
ue b
y in
trod
ucin
g se
lf to
oth
ers,
disc
losi
ng p
ronu
ncia
tion
appr
ehen
sion
, and
requ
estin
g or
al fe
edba
ck fr
om li
sten
ers.
8. T
he s
tude
nt h
as a
n in
trod
ucto
ry d
egre
eof
abi
lity
in p
ract
icin
g ho
w to
res
pond
toan
inte
rvie
wer
's q
uest
ions
usi
ng a
ttend
ing
beha
vior
s an
d ve
rbal
ly p
arap
hras
ing,
at a
nin
term
edia
te p
ronu
ncia
tion
leve
l of f
unct
iona
lco
mm
unic
atio
n sk
ills.
9. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
ver
bally
and
nonv
erba
lly in
tera
ct w
ith s
peak
ers
ofS
tand
ard
Am
eric
an E
nglis
h, a
t an
inte
rmed
iate
pro
nunc
iatio
n le
vel o
ffu
nctio
nal c
omm
unic
atio
n sk
ills,
in th
eG
WC
com
mun
icat
ion
labs
.
CO
PY A
VA
ILA
BL
E
52
GOLDEN WEST COLLEGE
CONTENT REVIEW FORM
Request for () Prerequisite Corequisite Advisory
TARGET COURSE (Name and Number): S PEP C11.14A O (-ForMerki Sp cows losCourse for which the prerequisite, corequisite or advisory is proposed
Content review requires klentification of ALL of the following by the discipline/department faculty of therespective course(s):
1. Before entering the target course the student should be able to:List skills. attitudes. competencies and or knowledge.
SEE ATTACHED
2. Upon completion of the prerequisite, corequisite, advisory course, the student should be able to:List skills, attitudes. competencies and or knowledge.
SEE ATTACHED
3. Compare the entry skills required for the target course (#1) with the exit skills of the requestedprerequisite, corequisite, advisory (#2). If there is a significant match, it supports the prerequisite,corequisite or advisory, are necessary for student success in the targeted course.
SEE ATTACHED
4. Upon completion of the target course, the student should be able to:List skills, attitudes, competencies and or knowledge.
CCI ACTION:
SEE ATTACHED
Approved Denied Date:
NOTE: Content Review is deferred to the program review year for the respective disciplines for the following:Prerequisite is required by statute or regulationPrerequisite is part of a closely related lecture-laboratory course pairing within a discipline
46
53
Tar
get C
ours
e :S
PE
EC
H C
OM
MU
NIC
AT
ION
110
-P
UB
LIC
SP
EA
KIN
GA
dvis
ory
Cou
rse
: Spe
ech
Com
mun
icat
ion
090
or09
5, E
nglis
h 01
0N
OT
E: S
tude
nts
with
an
iden
tifie
d di
sabi
lity
will
be
acco
mm
odat
ed in
an
appr
opria
te m
anne
r af
ter
cons
ulta
tion
with
the
Dis
able
d S
tude
nts
Ser
vice
s.
EN
TR
Y L
EV
EL
SK
ILLS
EX
IT L
EV
EL
SK
ILLS
- U
pon
CO
MP
AR
ISO
N o
fE
XIT
LE
VE
L S
KIL
LS -
Upo
n
Nee
d be
fore
ent
erin
g T
arge
t Cou
rse
com
plet
ion
of A
dvis
ory
Cou
rse
cntr
Y lc
vcl s
kills
with
exi
tsk
ills
ofA
dvis
ory
cour
seco
mpl
etio
n of
Tar
get C
ours
e
,
Spe
ech
110
Spe
ech
090
or 0
95S
peec
h 11
0
The
stu
dent
has
an
intr
oduc
tory
unde
rsta
ndin
g of
com
mun
icat
ion
appr
ehen
sion
and
can
iden
tify
situ
atio
nsw
hen
he/s
he m
ight
be
likel
y to
expe
rienc
e it.
The
stu
dent
has
an
intr
oduc
tory
unde
rsta
ndin
g of
com
mun
icat
ion
appr
ehen
sion
and
can
iden
tify
situ
atio
ns w
hen
he/s
he m
ight
be
likel
y to
exp
erie
nce
it.
Yes
- S
igni
fican
tT
he s
tude
nt h
as u
tilita
rian
unde
rsta
ndin
g of
com
mun
icat
ion
appr
ehen
sion
and
can
iden
tify
situ
atio
ns w
hen
he/s
he m
ight
be
likel
y to
exp
erie
nce
it an
d ca
nap
ply
at le
ast t
hree
diff
eren
tte
chni
ques
to r
educ
eC
omm
unic
atio
n A
ppre
hens
ion.
mat
ch
Stu
dent
will
be
able
to v
erba
lly a
skot
hers
app
ropr
iate
que
stio
ns to
gai
nIn
form
atio
n ab
out t
he o
ther
usi
ngde
scrip
tive
Sta
ndar
d A
mer
ican
Eng
lish.
Stu
dent
will
be
able
to v
erba
lly a
skot
hers
app
ropr
iate
que
stio
ns to
gain
Info
rmat
ion
abou
t the
oth
erus
ing
desc
riptiv
e S
tand
ard
Am
eric
an
Eng
lish.
Yes
- S
igni
fican
tS
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
inte
rvie
wot
hers
for
the
purp
ose
ofin
trod
ucin
g th
em to
a g
roup
of
clas
s m
ates
in a
pub
lic s
ettin
gus
ing
cong
ruen
t non
verb
albe
havi
ors
and
desc
riptiv
e S
tand
ard
Am
eric
an E
nglis
h.
mat
ch
.
The
stu
dent
und
erst
ands
the
diffe
renc
ebe
twee
n on
e-w
ay a
nd tw
o-w
ayco
mm
unic
atio
n pr
oces
ses.
The
stu
dent
und
erst
ands
the
diffe
renc
e be
twee
n on
e-w
ay a
ndtw
o-w
ay c
omm
unic
atio
npr
oces
ses.
.
Yes
- S
igni
fican
tT
he s
tude
nt u
nder
stan
ds th
eco
mpl
exity
of t
he c
omm
unic
atio
npr
oces
s an
d ca
n ex
plai
n th
edi
ffere
nce
betw
een
the
linea
r,in
tera
ctiv
e an
d tr
ansa
ctio
nal
com
mun
icat
ion
mod
els.
Add
ition
ally
the
Stu
dent
unde
rsta
nds
the
impo
rtan
tdi
ffere
nces
in c
omm
unic
atio
nco
ntex
ts -
inte
rper
sona
l, gr
oup,
publ
ic a
nd m
ass.
mat
ch
54A
:\CO
NT
R11
0.B
BB
June
19,
199
7
56
Tar
get C
ours
e :S
PE
EC
HC
OM
MU
NIC
AT
ION
110
- P
UB
LIC
SP
EA
KIN
G
Adv
isor
y C
ours
e : S
peec
hC
omm
unic
atio
n 09
0 or
095
, Eng
lish
010
NO
TE
:S
tude
nts
with
an
iden
tifie
d di
sabi
lity
will
be
acco
mm
odat
ed in
an
appr
opria
te m
anne
r af
ter
cons
ulta
tion
with
the
Dis
able
d S
tude
nts
Ser
vice
s.
EN
TR
Y L
EV
EL
SK
ILLS
EX
IT L
EV
EL
SK
ILLS
- U
pon
CO
MP
AR
ISO
N o
fE
XIT
LE
VE
L S
KIL
LS -
Upo
n
Nee
d be
fore
ent
erin
g T
arge
t Cou
rse
com
plet
ion
of A
dvis
ory
Cou
rse
entr
y le
vel s
kills
with
exi
tsk
ills
ofA
dvis
ory
curs
eco
mpl
etio
n of
Tar
get C
ours
e
Usi
ng S
tand
ard
Am
eric
an E
nglis
h th
eU
sing
Sta
ndar
d A
mer
ican
Eng
lish
Yes
- S
igni
fican
tU
sing
Sta
ndar
d A
mer
ican
Eng
lish
stud
ent w
ill b
e ab
le to
ver
bally
mai
ntai
nth
e st
uden
t will
be
able
to v
erba
llym
atch
and
cong
ruen
t non
verb
al b
ehav
iors
a co
nver
satio
n by
usin
g op
en q
uest
ions
,hi
ghlig
htin
g, a
skin
g fo
llow
-up
ques
tions
and
dis
clos
ing
info
rmat
ion
mai
ntai
n a
conv
ersa
tion
by u
sing
open
que
stio
ns,
high
light
ing,
aski
ng fo
llow
-up
ques
tions
and
the
stud
ent w
ill b
e ab
le to
ver
bally
initi
ate
mai
ntai
n an
d co
nclu
de a
form
al in
terv
iew
usi
ng o
pen
abou
t sel
fdi
sclo
sing
info
rmat
ion
abou
t sel
fqu
estio
ns, a
skin
g fo
llow
-up
ques
tions
, tak
ing
adeq
uate
not
esan
d ve
rifyi
ng e
ssen
tial
info
rmat
ion.
Usi
ng S
tand
ard
Am
eric
an E
nglis
hth
eU
sing
Sta
ndar
d A
mer
ican
Eng
lish
Yes
- S
igni
fican
tU
sing
Sta
ndar
d A
mer
ican
Eng
lish
stud
ent w
ill b
e ab
le to
con
stru
ct a
the
stud
ent w
ill b
e ab
le to
con
stru
ctm
atch
the
stud
ent w
ill b
e ab
le to
out
line
sim
ple
proc
ess
spee
ch o
utlin
eIn
clud
ing
a si
mpl
e pr
oces
s sp
eech
outli
nea
spee
ch in
clud
ing
a pu
rpos
e
a pu
rpos
e st
atem
ent,
thes
is, a
ndor
gani
zing
mat
eria
l in
a ch
rono
logi
cal
incl
udin
g a
purp
ose
stat
emen
t,th
esis
, and
org
aniz
ing
mat
eria
l in
a
stat
emen
t, th
esis
sta
tem
ent,
and
an a
ppro
pria
teor
gani
zatio
nal
orde
r.ch
rono
logi
cal o
rder
.pa
ttern
for
both
info
rmat
ive
and
pers
uasi
ve s
peec
hes.
Usi
ng S
tand
ard
Am
eric
anE
nglis
h th
eU
sing
Sta
ndar
d A
mer
ican
Eng
lish
Yes
-S
igni
fican
tU
sing
Sta
ndar
d A
mer
ican
Eng
lish
stud
ent w
ill b
e ab
le to
pre
pare
an
the
stud
ent w
ill b
e ab
le to
pre
pare
mat
chth
e st
uden
t will
be
able
to p
repa
re
intr
oduc
tion
to a
pro
cess
spe
ech
an in
trod
uctio
n to
a p
roce
sssp
eech
an in
trod
uctio
n fo
rbot
h
incl
udin
g a
way
to g
ain
the
atte
ntio
nof
incl
udin
g a
way
to g
ain
the
info
rmat
ive
and
pers
uasi
ve
the
audi
ence
and
est
ablis
h ra
ppor
tw
ithat
tent
ion
of th
e au
dien
ce a
ndsp
eech
es. S
tude
nts
will
be
able
to
them
.es
tabl
ish
rapp
ort w
ith th
em.
use
at le
ast f
our
diffe
rent
stra
tegi
es fo
r ga
inin
g au
dien
ceat
tent
ion
A:\C
ON
TR
110.
BB
BJu
ne 1
9, 1
997
57
Tar
get C
ours
e :S
PEE
CH
CO
MM
UN
ICA
TIO
N 1
10 -
PU
BL
ICSP
EA
KIN
G
Adv
isor
y C
ours
e : S
peec
hC
omm
unic
atio
n 09
0 or
095
, Eng
lish
010
NO
TE
: Stu
dent
s w
ith a
n id
entif
ied
disa
bilit
y w
illbe
acc
omm
odat
ed in
an
appr
opria
te m
anne
raf
ter
cons
ulta
tion
with
the
Dis
able
d S
tude
nts
Ser
vic
EN
TR
Y L
EV
EL
SK
ILL
SE
XIT
LE
VE
L S
KIL
LS
- U
pon
CO
MPA
RIS
ON
ofE
XIT
LE
VE
L S
KIL
LS
-Upo
n
Nee
d be
fore
ent
erin
g T
arge
t Cou
rse
com
plet
ion
of A
dvis
ory
Cou
rse
entr
y le
vel s
kills
wis
h ex
itsk
ills
of A
dvis
ory
cour
seco
mpl
etio
n of
Tar
get C
ours
e
Usi
ng S
tand
ard
Am
eric
an E
nglis
h th
est
uden
t will
be
able
topr
epar
e a
conc
lusi
on f
or a
pro
cess
spe
ech
incl
udin
g a
sum
mar
y of
the
maj
orst
eps.
Usi
ng S
tand
ard
Am
eric
an E
nglis
hth
e st
uden
t will
be
able
topr
epar
ea
conc
lusi
on f
or a
pro
cess
spe
ech
incl
udin
g a
sum
mar
y of
the
maj
orst
eps.
Yes
- S
igni
fican
tU
sing
Sta
ndar
d A
mer
ican
Eng
lish
the
stud
ent w
ill b
e ab
leto
util
ize
atle
ast f
our
diff
eren
t str
ateg
ies
inpr
epar
ing
a co
nclu
sion
sap
prop
riat
e fo
r in
form
ativ
e or
pers
uasi
ve s
peec
hes.
mat
ch
Usi
ng S
tand
ard
Am
eric
an E
nglis
hth
eU
sing
Sta
ndar
d A
mer
ican
Eng
lish
Ygs
- S
igni
fican
tU
sing
Sta
ndar
d A
mer
ican
Eng
lish
stud
ent w
ill b
e ab
le to
verb
ally
pre
sent
the
stud
ent w
ill b
e ab
le to
verb
ally
mat
chth
e st
uden
t will
be
able
tove
rbal
ly
his/
her
proc
ess
spee
ch to
the
clas
spr
esen
t his
/her
pro
cess
spee
ch to
prev
ent b
oth
and
info
rmat
ive
and
usin
g an
out
line.
the
clas
s us
ing
an o
utlin
ea
pers
uasi
ve s
peec
h to
the
clas
sus
ing
appr
opri
ate
orga
niza
tiona
lpa
ttern
s, a
dequ
ate
supp
ort,
effe
ctiv
e de
liver
y sk
ills,
and
cong
ruen
t non
verb
al b
ehav
iors
Stu
dent
will
be
able
tow
ork
with
aS
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
wor
k w
ith a
Yea
-S
igni
fican
tS
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
wor
k w
ith
smal
l gro
up o
f cl
assm
ates
tode
fine
,re
sear
ch a
nd a
naly
ze a
pro
blem
.
smal
l gro
up o
f cl
assm
ates
to d
efin
e,re
sear
ch a
nd a
naly
ze a
pro
blem
.m
atch
a sm
all g
roup
of
clas
smat
es to
choo
se a
pro
blem
, bra
inst
orm
Idea
s re
late
d to
this
topi
c, d
efin
eth
e pr
oble
m in
term
s of
fac
t,va
lue,
or
polic
y, r
esea
rch
pote
ntia
l sol
utio
ns u
sing
a v
arie
tyof
res
ourc
es a
nd p
repa
re a
gro
uppr
esen
tatio
n us
ing
an a
ppro
pria
tefo
rmat
.
5859
A:\C
ON
TR
110.
BB
BJu
ne 1
9, 1
997
Tar
get C
ours
e :S
PE
EC
H C
OM
MU
NIC
AT
ION
110
- P
UB
LIC
SP
EA
KIN
GA
dvis
ory
Cou
rse
: Spe
ech
Com
mun
icat
ion
090
or09
5, E
nglis
h 01
0N
OT
E: S
tude
nts
with
an
iden
tifie
d di
sabi
lity
will
be
acco
mm
odat
ed in
an
appr
opria
te m
anne
raf
ter
cons
ulta
tion
with
the
Dis
able
d S
tude
nts
Ser
vice
s.
EN
TR
Y L
EV
EL
SK
ILLS
EX
IT L
EV
EL
SK
ILLS
- U
pon
CO
MP
AR
ISO
N o
fE
XIT
LE
VE
L S
KIL
LS -
Upo
n
Nee
d be
fore
ent
erin
g T
arge
t Cou
rse
com
plet
ion
of A
dvis
ory
Cou
rse
entr
y le
vel s
kills
with
exi
tsk
ills
of A
dvis
ory
cour
seco
mpl
etio
n of
Tar
get C
ours
e
Stu
dent
will
be
able
to r
espo
nd to
oth
ers
Stu
dent
will
be
able
to r
espo
nd to
Yes
-S
igni
fican
tS
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
res
pond
to
by u
sing
app
ropr
iate
turn
taki
ng,
owne
d la
ngua
ge, a
ttend
ing
beha
vior
san
d si
mpl
e pa
raph
rasi
ng in
one
on
one
inte
ract
ions
..
othe
rs b
y us
ing
appr
opria
te tu
rnta
king
, ow
ned
lang
uage
, act
ive
liste
ning
and
agr
eein
g/di
agre
eing
in o
ne o
n on
e in
tera
ctio
ns.
mat
chot
hers
by
usin
g a
varie
ty o
fap
prop
riate
list
enin
g sk
ills,
incl
udin
g; p
arap
hras
ing,
perc
eptio
n ch
ecki
ng, e
xpre
ssin
gag
reem
ent a
nd d
isag
reem
ent,
turn
taki
ng, o
wne
d la
ngua
ge,
atte
ndin
g be
havi
ors,
ask
ing
open
,cl
osed
and
follo
w-u
p qu
estio
ns.
Stu
dent
will
be
able
to r
espo
nd to
oth
ers
Stu
dent
will
be
able
to r
espo
nd to
Yes
-S
igni
fican
tS
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
res
pond
to
by u
sing
app
ropr
iate
eye
con
tact
, fac
ial
othe
rs b
y us
ing
appr
opria
te e
yem
atch
othe
rs b
y us
ing
appr
opria
te e
ye
expr
essi
ons,
ges
ture
s an
d m
ovem
ents
tode
mon
stra
te in
tere
st a
nd a
ttent
iven
ess
cont
act,
faci
al e
xpre
ssio
ns, g
estu
res
and
mov
emen
ts to
dem
onst
rate
cont
act,
faci
al e
xpre
ssio
ns,
gest
ures
and
mov
emen
ts to
in o
ne o
n on
e in
tera
ctio
ns.
inte
rest
and
atte
ntiv
enes
s in
one
on
one
inte
ract
ions
.
dem
onst
rate
inte
rest
atte
ntiv
enes
san
d un
ders
tand
ing
in a
var
iety
of
com
mun
icat
ion
cont
exts
,in
clud
ing;
info
rmal
and
form
alpr
esen
tatio
ns, s
mal
l gro
updi
scus
sion
s an
d, a
nd in
divi
dual
clas
sroo
m p
rese
ntat
ions
.
A:\C
ON
TR
110.
BB
BJu
ne 1
9, 1
997
61
82
Tar
get C
ours
e :S
PE
EC
HC
OM
MU
NIC
AT
ION
110
- P
UB
LIC
SP
EA
KIN
G
Adv
isor
y C
ours
e : S
peec
hC
omm
unic
atio
n 09
0 or
095
, Eng
lish
010
NO
TE
: Stu
dent
s w
ith a
n id
entif
ied
disa
bilit
y w
illbe
acc
omm
odat
ed in
an
appr
opria
te m
anne
rafte
r co
nsul
tatio
n w
ith th
e D
isab
led
Stu
dent
s S
ervi
ces.
EN
TR
Y L
EV
EL
SK
ILLS
EX
IT L
EV
EL
SK
ILLS
- U
pon
CO
MP
AR
ISO
N o
fE
XIT
LE
VE
L S
IMM
S -
Upo
n
Nee
d be
fore
ent
erin
g T
arge
t Cou
rse
com
plet
ion
of A
dvis
ory
Cou
rse
entr
y le
vel s
kills
with
cut
skill
s of
Adv
isor
y co
urse
com
plet
ion
of T
arge
t Cou
rse
Stu
dent
will
be
able
tore
spon
d to
oth
ers
by u
sing
app
ropr
iate
var
iatio
n of
spee
ch v
olum
e, r
ate
and
enun
ciat
ion
ata
func
tiona
l lev
el o
fcom
mun
nica
tion.
Stu
dent
will
be
able
tore
spon
d to
othe
rs b
y us
ing
appr
opri
ate
vari
atio
n of
spe
ech
volu
me,
rat
ean
d en
unci
atio
n at
a f
unct
iona
lle
vel o
f co
mm
unni
catio
n. .
yo -
Sig
nific
ant
mat
ch
Stu
dent
will
be
able
tous
eap
prop
riat
e va
riat
ion
of v
ocal
pitc
h, v
olum
e, r
ate
and
into
natio
n to
rei
nfor
ce th
em
eani
ng o
f w
ords
in a
var
iety
of
com
mun
icat
ion
cont
exts
,in
clud
ing;
info
rmal
and
form
al o
neon
one
inte
ract
ions
,sm
all g
roup
disc
ussi
ons
and
pres
enta
tions
, and
indi
vidu
al c
lass
room
pres
enta
tions
..
st,
,?
,,
...
.
h 61
0,
eA4A
1 f1
'
..,
Soe
ch 1
Stu
dent
will
be
able
topr
ouno
unce
.pa
raph
rase
, ask
ope
n A
clo
sed
ques
tions
abo
ut p
ublic
spe
akin
gsi
tuat
ions
Stu
dent
will
be
able
tous
evo
cabu
lary
in a
var
iety
of
cont
exts
,fo
llow
dir
ectio
nsfo
r as
sign
men
ts.
Yes
-S
igni
fican
tS
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
use
SAE
inpr
esen
ting
spee
ches
and
inpr
ovid
ing
oral
fee
dbac
k to
clas
smat
es p
rese
ntat
ions
mat
ch
Stu
dent
will
be
able
tous
e SA
E in
givi
ng o
ral i
nstr
uctio
ns a
bout
how
to
follo
w s
teps
In
a pr
oces
s
Stu
dent
will
be
able
to m
aint
ain
SWE
In
full
supp
ort p
arag
raph
sus
ing
chro
nolo
gica
l dev
elop
men
t
Yes
-S
igni
fican
tS
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
use
SA
Ein
info
rmat
ive
spee
ches
high
light
ing,
tim
e, o
rder
&se
quen
ce.
mat
ch
Stu
dent
will
be
able
tous
e m
odif
r ve
rbal
and
nonv
erba
l beh
avio
rsw
hen
spea
king
.
Stu
dent
will
be
able
tore
vise
and
use
rhet
roic
al f
eatu
res
&
voca
bula
ry p
atte
rns
its -
Sig
nific
ant
mat
ch
Stu
dent
will
be
able
tous
e a
vari
ety
of v
erba
l and
non
verb
alst
rata
gies
to e
nhan
ce m
essa
geim
pact
whe
n sp
eaki
ngin
sev
eral
diffe
rent
con
text
s.
A:\C
ON
TR
I 10
.BB
BJu
ne 1
9, 1
997
'63
64
Tar
get C
ours
e :S
PEE
CH
CO
MM
UN
ICA
TIO
N 1
10-
PUB
LIC
SPE
AK
ING
Adv
isor
y C
ours
e : S
peec
h C
omm
unic
atio
n 09
0 or
095
, Eng
lish
010
NO
TE
: Stu
dent
s w
ith a
n id
entif
ied
disa
bilit
y w
ill b
e ac
com
mod
ated
inan
app
ropr
iate
man
ner
afte
r co
nsul
tatio
n w
ith th
e D
isab
led
Stu
dent
s S
ervi
ces.
EN
TR
Y L
EV
EL
SK
ILL
SE
XIT
LE
VE
L S
KIL
LS
- U
pon
CO
MPA
RIS
ON
ofE
XIT
LE
VE
L S
KIL
LS -
Upo
nN
eed
befo
re e
nter
ing
Tar
get C
ours
eco
mpl
etio
n of
Adv
isor
y C
ours
een
try
leve
l ski
lls w
ith e
xit
skill
s of
Adv
isor
y co
urse
com
plet
ion
of T
arge
t Cou
rse
Stu
dent
will
be
able
to o
bjec
tivel
yci
teso
urce
s of
fac
t & o
pini
on, s
tate
ow
n &
desc
ribe
oth
ers
perc
eptio
ns in
spe
eche
s
Stu
dent
will
be
able
tore
vise
& u
seed
itori
als
argu
men
ts a
nd r
ecog
nize
argu
men
tativ
e pa
ttern
s of
pro
of o
rin
cons
iste
ncie
s
Yes
- S
igni
fican
tS
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
use
audi
ence
cen
tere
d. lo
gica
l,em
otio
nal l
angu
age
in p
ersu
asiv
esp
eech
es to
gai
n m
utua
l ben
ifit
mat
ch
Stu
dent
will
be
able
to li
sten
crit
ical
ly,
use
caus
e/ef
fect
/con
sequ
ence
sbeh
avio
rde
scri
ptio
ns to
res
earc
h, o
utlin
e an
dan
alyz
e cu
rren
t top
ics
affe
ctin
gm
ultic
ultu
ral a
udie
nces
Stu
dent
will
be
able
tore
adan
alyt
ical
ly, w
rite
ess
ays
unif
ied
byth
esis
& c
onta
inin
g an
intr
oduc
tion,
con
tnen
t with
ord
er o
fid
eas,
tran
skito
ns {
con
clus
ions
ina
publ
ic d
isco
urse
mod
e
Yes
-S
igni
fican
tS
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
anal
yze
audi
ence
nee
ds &
exp
ecta
stio
ns,
focu
s on
coo
rdin
ated
&su
bord
inat
ed o
rgan
izat
ion
ofm
ainp
oint
s &
use
incl
usiv
ela
ngua
ge in
publ
ic s
peak
ing
cont
exts
mat
ch
Stu
dent
will
be
able
tous
e SA
E in
wor
king
with
a p
eer
In th
e L
ab.
Stu
dent
will
be
able
tow
rite
inW
ritn
g C
ente
r to
pra
ctic
e E
nglis
h01
0 w
ritte
n di
scou
rse
skill
s
Yes
-S
igni
fican
tS
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
satif
acto
rial
ly c
ompl
ete
Spee
ch11
0 L
ab a
ssig
nmen
ts.
mat
ch
A:\C
ON
TR
110.
BB
BJu
ne 1
9, 1
997
65
Gol
den
Wes
t Col
lege
Spe
ech
Com
mun
icat
ion
Pro
gram
PeO
r101
AV
ICili
g, S
pear
ing,
and
Lis
teni
ng S
ki IL
Sto
vidc
mis
(Der
ived
from
the
1997
Pro
gram
and
Con
tent
Rev
iew
con
duct
ed b
y th
e G
olde
n W
est C
olle
ge S
peec
h C
omm
unic
atio
n D
epar
tmen
t, H
untin
gton
Bea
ch,
CA
.)
Ski
lls N
eede
d B
efor
e E
nter
ing
Sp
Cor
n 11
0S
kills
Acq
uire
d U
pon
Com
plet
ion
of S
o C
orn
110
1. T
he s
tude
nt s
houl
d ha
ve a
n in
trod
ucto
ry
unde
rsta
ndin
g of
com
mun
icat
ion
appr
ehen
sion
and
can
iden
tify
situ
atio
ns w
hen
he/s
he
mig
ht h
e lik
ely
to e
xper
ienc
e it.
2. T
he s
tude
nt s
houl
d be
abl
e to
ver
bally
ask
and
answ
er q
uest
ions
to g
ain
info
rmat
ion
abou
t
publ
ic s
peak
ing
assi
gnm
ents
and
inte
ract
ions
.
3. T
he s
tude
nt s
houl
d be
abl
e to
und
erst
and
the
diffe
renc
e be
twee
n on
e-w
ay a
nd tw
o-w
aym
essa
ge c
larif
icat
ion
proc
esse
s us
ed to
sel
ect
alte
rnat
e rh
etor
ical
feat
ures
to m
odify
ver
bal
& n
onve
rbal
beh
avio
rs w
hen
spea
king
to o
ther
s.
4. T
he s
tude
nt s
houl
d be
abl
e to
art
icul
ate
Sta
ndar
d A
mer
ican
Eng
lish
spok
en g
ram
mar
in g
ivin
g or
al in
stru
ctio
ns a
bout
how
tofo
llow
ste
ps in
a c
hron
olog
ical
ord
er.
5. T
he s
tude
nt s
houl
d be
abl
e to
cle
arly
enun
ciat
e S
tand
ard
Am
eric
an E
nglis
h to
desc
riptiv
ely,
obj
ectiv
ely
& lo
gica
lly c
iteso
urce
s of
fact
& o
pini
ons,
sta
te o
wn
and
desc
ribe
othe
r's p
erce
ptio
ns in
pub
lic
spea
king
and
list
enin
g si
tuat
ions
.
60
1. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill h
ave
a ut
ilita
rian
unde
rsta
ndin
g of
com
mun
icat
ion
appr
ehen
sion
,ca
n id
entif
y si
tuat
ions
whe
n he
/she
mig
ht b
elik
ely
to e
xper
ienc
e it
and
can
appl
y at
leas
tth
ree
diffe
rent
tech
niqu
es to
red
uce
it.
2. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
ver
bally
ask
othe
rs p
ertin
ant q
uest
ions
to g
ain
and
give
info
rmat
ion
durin
g la
b an
d cl
assr
oom
inte
rvie
ws,
inte
ract
ions
& d
iscu
ssio
ns.
3. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
col
labo
rativ
ely,
clar
ify p
ublic
spe
akin
g m
essa
ges
& in
tera
ctio
nsin
mul
ticul
tura
l con
text
s by
usi
ng a
var
iety
of
verb
al &
non
verb
al s
trat
egie
s in
cul
tura
llydi
vers
e in
terp
erso
nal,
grou
p, p
ublic
& m
ass-
med
ia s
peak
ing
& li
sten
ing
inte
ract
ions
.
4. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
exp
licitl
yar
ticul
ate
Sta
ndar
d A
mer
ican
Eng
lish
spok
en
gram
mar
in o
ral p
rese
ntai
ons
of in
form
ativ
e,gr
oup
& p
ersu
asiv
e sp
eech
es to
gui
de &
focu
slis
tene
r's a
ttent
ion
to th
e pr
actic
al &
logi
cal
prog
ress
ion
of v
erba
l & n
onve
rbal
sup
port
.
5. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
cle
arly
enu
ncia
teS
tand
ard
Am
eric
an E
nglis
h to
des
crip
tivel
y,ob
ject
ivel
y, lo
gica
lly &
crit
ical
ly c
ite &
use
audi
ence
-cen
tere
d is
sues
, fac
ts &
opi
nion
s in
info
rmat
ive,
gro
up &
per
suas
ive
spee
ches
tom
aint
ain
reci
proc
al r
elat
ions
hips
and
/or
gain
mut
ual b
enef
its.
BE
ST
CO
PY
AV
AIL
AB
LE
Ski
lls N
eede
d B
efor
e E
nter
ing
Sp
Cor
n 11
0
6. T
he s
tude
nt s
houl
d be
abl
e to
use
Sta
ndar
d
Am
eric
an E
nglis
h by
em
phas
izin
g th
e sp
eech
purp
ose
in s
ylla
bles
, str
ess
& in
tona
tion
&by
ver
bally
con
veyi
ng r
esea
rche
d an
d ou
tline
dm
ultic
ultu
ral p
ublic
dis
cour
se m
ater
ials
that
incl
ude
an in
trod
uctio
n, s
ubor
dina
ted
deta
ils,
a co
nclu
sion
and
tran
sitio
ns li
nkin
g su
ppor
tda
ta to
func
tion
& in
tent
ion
of th
e sp
eech
.
7. T
he s
tude
nt s
houl
d be
abl
e to
use
Sta
ndar
d
Am
eric
an E
nglis
h to
ver
bally
mai
ntai
n or
alin
tera
ctio
ns w
ith o
ther
s in
sm
all g
roup
s to
wor
k w
ith c
ultu
rally
div
erse
cla
ssm
ates
to
defin
e, r
esea
rch,
ana
lyze
& o
rgan
ize
anau
dien
ce-c
ente
red
prob
lem
-sol
ving
dis
cuss
ion.
8. T
he s
tude
nt s
houl
d be
abl
e to
res
pond
to
cultu
rally
div
erse
oth
ers
by d
emon
stra
ting
atte
ndin
g be
havi
ors
& u
sing
turn
taki
ng,
owne
d la
ngua
ge &
cle
ar p
arap
hras
ing
appr
opria
te to
the
imm
edia
te c
onte
xt.
9. T
he s
tude
nt s
houl
d be
abl
e to
ver
bally
&no
nver
bally
inte
ract
with
spe
aker
s of
Sta
ndar
d A
mer
ican
Eng
lish
whe
n w
orki
ngw
ith p
eers
or
assi
stan
ts in
the
GW
C la
bs.
p.53
Ski
lls A
cqui
red
Upo
n C
ompl
etio
n of
Sp
Cor
n 11
0
6. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
use
Sta
ndar
d
Am
eric
an E
nglis
h to
str
ateg
ical
ly e
mph
asiz
eth
e sp
eech
pur
pose
in s
ylla
bles
, str
ess
&in
tona
tion
& b
y ve
rbal
ly c
onve
ying
res
earc
hed
& o
utlin
ed m
ater
ials
ana
lyze
d to
mee
t the
need
s of
mul
ticul
tura
l aud
ienc
e be
liefs
, val
ues
& e
xpec
tatio
ns &
that
pro
vide
incl
usiv
ela
ngua
ge fo
cusi
ng o
n a
unifi
ed th
esis
of
shar
ing
mea
ning
in in
form
ativ
e, g
roup
and
pers
uasi
ve p
ublic
spe
akin
g co
ntex
ts.
7. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
use
Sta
ndar
d
Am
eric
an E
nglis
h to
ver
bally
& n
onve
rbal
lypa
rtic
ipat
e in
task
orie
nted
& r
elat
ions
hip
orie
nted
pro
blem
-sol
ving
gro
up in
tera
ctio
ns to
defin
e a
prob
lem
in te
rms
of fa
ct, d
efin
ition
,va
lue
or p
olic
y, r
esea
rch
pote
ntia
l sol
utio
nsus
ing
a va
riety
of c
ultu
rally
div
erse
res
ourc
es
and
prep
are
a gr
oup
pres
enta
tion
usin
g a
colla
bora
tive
criti
cal t
hink
ing
form
at to
reac
h a
cons
ensu
s on
a fe
asib
le s
olut
ion.
8. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
res
pond
to
cultu
rally
div
erse
oth
er's
pub
lic s
peak
ing
verb
al &
non
verb
al m
essa
ges
by n
onve
rbal
ly
dem
onst
ratin
g at
tend
ing
beha
vior
s in
clud
ing
eye
cont
act,
faci
al e
xpre
ssio
n, g
estu
res
&m
ovem
ents
indi
catin
g in
tere
st &
atte
ntiv
enes
s
& b
y ve
rbal
ly u
sing
turn
taki
ng, o
wne
dla
ngua
ge, c
onte
xt-r
elat
ed p
arap
hras
ing
& a
stat
emen
t of a
ppre
ciat
ion
prov
idin
g an
exam
ple
of h
ow th
e lis
tene
r ha
s, is
or
will
be a
ble
to r
elat
e to
the
spea
ker's
mes
sage
.
9. T
he s
tude
nt w
ill b
e ab
le to
ver
bally
&no
nver
bally
inte
ract
with
spe
aker
s of
Sta
ndar
d A
mer
ican
Eng
lish
whe
n w
orki
ng w
ithpe
ers
or a
ssis
tant
s to
sat
isfa
ctor
ily c
ompl
ete
Spe
ech
110
Lab
Ass
ignm
ents
.
67
To: Marilyn Dorfman, Learning Resources DeanFrom: Norma Flores, Speech Communication 020, 027, and 110 Instructor
Ref: GWC Speech Dept. Pedagogical, Assessment, and -Accountability Concerns
As Related to The ...Intercultural, Speech Communication, and Tutoring Centers
Date: 11/3 /97
Problems
1. LACK OF STAFFING for Sp 020and Sp 027 students requiringlisteners for skills #1, 4, & 7.
2. LACK OF TRAINING for I.C. staffin giving feedback for skills #1,4and 7.
3. LACK IN THE AVAILABILITY OFAPPOINTMENT TIME SLOTS toserve the needs of the students(limited hours listeners in ICC)
Criteria
1. LACK OF STAFFING: (a)Studentsshould not be deprived of theopportunity to practice speaking andlistening skills (b)instructorsneed to provide students with amethod for practicing their oralpronunciation skills (c) CenterStaffs need to know they can fit theirfree time into an open endedschedule.
2. LACK OF TRAINING: (a)Studentsshould not be deprived of role modelnative speakers of Englishwhen interacting to maintainintercultural relationships throughstructured pronouncing,speaking, and listening lab centerexperiences (b)Instructors need toprovide students with a method formaintaining relationships by usingpronunciation in interculturalcontexts (c) Center Staffs needeasy to follow instructions of howto fill out lab interaction forms toprovide students and instructorswith feedback about skill levels.
3. LACK IN THE AVAILABILITY OFAPPOINTMENT TIME SLOTS:(a) Students shouldn't have to misswork or family obligations toreturn to campus for appointments(b) Instructors need to know whenthe Integrated Lab Centers will beopen and staffed in order to plantheir lab assignments before eachsemester starts (c)Center Staffsneed increased resources beforethey can increase appointmenttimes and days labs will be open.
p. 55 fli
Suggested Solutions
1. LACK OF STAFFING:Coordinate Scheduling Needs(a) Complie a list of the dates andtimes each instructor expectsstudents to use the IC Center(b) count the number of studentsexpected to use labs (c) design aMon-Fri calendar for each week ofthe semester showing available timeslots (d) estimate how manyvolunteers will be needed (e) printthe list of days, times, & numberof volunteers needed (f) use list asrecruitment/sign up sheet inmainstream speech classes, inbusiness corn classes, in English,Spanish and Vietnamese languageclasses, in social science classes,in campus and community serviceclubs.
2. LACK OF TRAINING:Provide Training Videos(a) each instructor demonstrateshow to use their skill packets(b) videotapes a sample speaker/listener skill demonstration and(c) leaves the video in the Centerfor both students and volunteersto use for their guidelines.
3. LACK IN AVAILABILITY OFAPPOINTMENT TIME SLOTS:Study Skills Scholarships(a) Make a large poster size signof the center's services and hours(b) list expectations of studentswhich include being on time, beingprepared, and method of enforcingexcessive appointment cancelations(c)consult with the GWC FoundationsOffficer to ask for donations forCommunication Study Skills fundsto cover additional expensesincurred by keeping the IntegratedIC/Speech/Tutoring Center openM-F for the use of speech students aswell as international students.
References
Bryan, J.W. (1997), Interpersonal Communication-Speech Communication 100-Skill CompetencyDemonstration Packet: Assertion Skill Demonstration. Huntington Beach, CA: Golden West College,
Speech Communication Department.
Bryan, J.W. (1997), Interpersonal Communication-Speech Communication 100-Skill CompetencyDemonstration Packet: Perceptions Skill Demonstration. Huntington Beach, CA: Golden West College,
Speech Communication Department.
Bryan, J.W. (1997), Communication Principles,-Speech Communication 108-Skill CompetencyDemonstration Packet: Opinions Skill Demonstration. Huntington Beach, CA: Golden West College,
Speech Communication Department.
Bryan, J.W. (1997), Public Speaking-Speech Communication 110- Content Review and Comparison ofEntry Level Skills with Exit Level Skills of Advisory Course. Huntington Beach, CA: Golden West College,
Speech Communication Department and Language Arts Division.
Chaney, A. L., & Burk, T. L. (1998), Teaching Oral Communication in Grades K-8: Preface, pp. xiii-xv.Needham Heights, MA., Allyn and Bacon Publishing.
Chaney, A.L., & Burk, T.L. (1998), Teaching Oral Communication in Grades K-8: The Importance of aCommunication-Friendly Classroom, Multicultural and Intercultural Communication, pp. 38-40.
Needham Heights, MA., Allyn and Bacon Publishing.
Chaney, A.L., & Burk, T.L. (1998), Teaching Oral Communication in Grades K-8: Authentic PerformanceAssessment, Interviews and Constructed-Response Assessments, pp. 139-140. Needham Heights, MA.,Allyn and Bacon Publishing.
Flores, N.L., & Ratliffe, S.A. (1994), Clarifying Perceptions Skill Competency Demonstration RevisionPrototype. How To Develop A Competency-Based Speech Communication Laboratory Assessment Program.1994 SCA Summer Conference Proceedings and Prepared Remarks on "Assessing College StudentCompetency in Speech Communication", Speech Communication Association, Annandale, VA.
Flores, N.L. (1994), Intercultural Assessment of Communication Competency and English Speaking Skills:I ACCESS Test & User's Guide. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Summer Conference onAssessing College Student Competency in Speech Communication, Alexandria, VA., August 4-7.
Flores,N.L., & Ratliffe, S.A. (1994) How To Develop A Competency-Based Speech Communication LaboratoryAssessment Program. 1994 SCA Summer Conference Proceedings and Prepared Remarks on "AssessingCollege Student Competency in Speech Communication", Speech Communication Association, Annandale, VA.
Flores, N.L. (1995), Using Dialogue Between Researcher And Participants As A Method Of Coping WithIssues Of Credibility In Translation Of Hispanics' Pronunciation : Bicultural Oral Communication
Assessment, Pronunciation Skills. Paper presented at the SCA Convention, San Antonio, Nov. 18-21.ERIC DOC. 390 096.
56
References
Flores, N.L. (1995), Assessment of Oral Communication and Pronunciation Competency . Huntington Beach,
CA: Speech Communication Department.
Flores, N.L. (1995), Intercultural Assessment of Communication Competency and English Speaking Skills-High School Edition. Highlights of the SCA Assessment Conference & Instrument Users Workshop. Paperpresented at the California Speech Communication Association Conference at California State University,
San Francisco, April.
Flores, N.L. (1995), Multicultural Collaborative Communication Model: Using Indigenous Strategies ToManage Learning In Multicultural Public Speaking Classrooms. Paper presented at the SCA Convention,
San Antonio, Nov. 18-21. ERIC DOC. 390 095.
Flores, N.L. (1996), Assessment of Communication Competency and English Speaking Skills--ElementarySchool Oral Performance: SCA Prototype. Assessment Format Developed in Consultation with SCA's
Committee on Assessment and Testing Panel Discussions at the SCA Convention, San Diego, Nov. 1996.
Flores, N.L., & Bryan, J.W. (1997), Speech Communication 110-Public Speaking CompetencyLabInteraction Workbook: Outlining & Practicing a Speech to Motivate to Action. Huntington Beach, CA:
Golden West College, Speech Communication Department.
Flores, N.L. (1997), Speech Communication 027-Vocational Communication-Advanced PronunciationSkills Demonstration Portfolio: Outlining & Practicing a Speech to Describe a Job-Related Object.
Huntington Beach, CA: Golden West College, Speech Communication Department.
Flores, N.L. (1997), Speech Communication 020-Intermediate Pronunciation-Skills DemonstrationPortfolio: Outlining & Practicing a Speech of Self-Introduction. Huntington Beach, CA: Golden West
College, Speech Communication Department.
Flores, N.L. (1997), Intermediate Pronunciation Skills-Speech Communication 060-Content Review andComparison of Entry Level Skills with Exit Level Skills of Advisory Course. Huntington Beach, CA:
Golden West College, Speech Communication Department and Language Arts Division.
Flores, N.L. (1997), Golden West College Speech Communication Program Pronouncing, Speaking, andListening Skills Standards for Speech Communication 020. Huntington Beach, CA: Golden West College,
Speech Communication Department.
Flores, N.L. (1997), Golden West College Speech Communication Program Pronouncing, Speaking, andListening Skills Standards for Speech Communication 110. Huntington Beach, CA: Golden West College,
Speech Communication Department.
Flores, N.L. (1997), GWC Speech Dept. Pedagogical, Assessment, and Accountability Concerns As Related ToThe Intercultural, Speech Communication, and Tutoring Centers. Huntington Beach, CA: Golden West
College, Speech Communication Department and Learning Assistance Resource Center.
Sudweeks, S., Ratliffe, S., & Hudson, D. (1997), Speech Communication 025-Speaking and Listening SkillsVolunteer Practice Session and Skill Demonstration: Process Speech Skill, Volunteer Practice Session.
Huntington Beach, CA: Golden West College, Speech Communication Department.
5772
C_Cs'oc/ (,,2git Would you like to put your paper in ERIC? Please send us a dark, clean copy!
U.S. Department of EducationOffice of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI)
Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC)
REPRODUCTION RELEASE
I. DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION:
(Specific Document)
ERIC
Title: +40-AA-) )-J 61_4-Q4A- Certhip-oC ax;e_cp-a4,2"-c<-6--kh_4( C-G-h_C_pyt..)44L- -7-11A.(74,t_
Author(s): LA- lJ I) c-0 S
Corporate Source: I Publication Date:
Noi. (7II. REPRODUCTION RELEASE:
In order to disseminate as widely as possible timely and significant materials of interest to the educational community, documents announcedin the monthly abstract journal of the ERIC system, Resources in Education (RIE), are usually made available to users in microfiche, reproducedpaper copy, and electronic/optical media, and sold through the ERIC Document Reproduction Service (EDRS) or other ERIC vendors. Credit isgiven to the source of each document, and, if reproduction release is granted, one of the following notices is affixed to the document.
If permission is granted to reproduce and disseminate the identified document, please CHECK ONE of the following two options and sign atthe bottom of the page.
CCheck here
For Level 1 Release:Permitting reproduction inmicrofiche (4' x 6* film) orother ERIC archival media(e.g., electronic or optical)and paper copy.
The sample sticker shown below will beaffixed to all Level 1 documents
PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE ANDDISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL
HAS BEEN GRANTED BY
TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)
Level 1
The sample sticker shown below will beaffixed to all Level 2 documents
PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE ANDDISSEMINATE THIS
MATERIAL IN OTHER THAN PAPERCOPY HAS BEEN GRANTED BY
\e,
TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)
Level 2
Documents will be processed as indicated provided reproduction quality permits. If permissionto reproduce is granted, but neither box is checked, documents will be processed at Level 1.
Check hereFor Level 2 Release:Permitting reproduction inmicrofiche (4' x 6' film) orother ERIC archival media(e.g., electronic or optical),but not in paper copy.
hereby grant to the Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC) nonexclusive permission to reproduce and disseminatethis document as indicated above. Reproduction from the ERIC microfiche or electronieoptical media by persons other thanERIC employees and its system contractors requires permission from the copyright holder. Exception is made for non-profitreproduction by libraries and other service agencies to satisfy information needs of educators in response to discrete inquiries.'
Sign Signature:
here-4please
Organization/Andress:
Gb I DP IA) C----ST Cal EC-7E 5feecks- 7 `-t./ C of 1.),Al west stRGET-i-i-um 67 ---4e/4
Printed Name/Position/Tide:
NORMA LAWM Ro RES Assoc. ?ko-Fissolz.
TeTialone: (.4 ) FAX
19? 77// 6,2(7- sn (71y) Fq g9,- 73-Mail Address: Date:
/DI 2 7
III. DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY INFORMATION (FROM NON-ERIC SOURCE):
If permission to reproduce is not granted to ERIC, or, if you wish ERIC to cite the availability of the document from another source,please provide the following information regarding the availability of the document. (ERIC will not announce a document unless it ispublicly available, and a dependable source can be specified. Contributors should also be aware that ERIC selection criteria aresignificantly more stringent for documents that cannot be made available through EDRS.)
Publisher/Distributor: 60 DC Aj w es-7- CO /I /1/7-Eg---
Address:601 iDeo co( I.EGE
4./t/ Goioe/4-(AN-7-11 NEa-e)c\) SE40+ 9.62"-c2V
Price.
C-6211-k2,_
IV. REFERRAL OF ERIC TO COPYRIGHT/REPRODUCTION RIGHTS HOLDER:
If the right to grant reproduction release is held by someone other than the addressee, please provide the appropriate name and address:
Name:
Address:
V. WHERE TO SEND THIS FORM:
Send this form to the following ERIC Clearinghouse: ch4V--: c/16.cf
ERIC/REC2805 E. Tenth StreetSmith Research Center,150Indiana UniversityBloomington, IN 47408
However, if solicited by the ERIC Facility, or if making an unsolicited contribution to ERIC, return this form (and the document beingcontributed) to:
-E.R4G-12xacasaiag-efid-Referenee-Feettity-1-1136-Weet-Stmat,-.24-Ektoz
-Erraret-tvlarytand-20-707=25t8
--Telerthernen-901-07-408044,14-Freel-699-7994742---FAX4-304443-0,26.1
[email protected]&gam_WWW7tritp-itericiaevieeertkoseTeam
(Rev. 6/96)