Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Kerr-Tar RPO TCC and TAC Meeting Thursday, July 30, 2020– 3:00PM – 5:00PM
Pursuant to NC Gen Stat §138A-15 (e): ETHICS AWARENESS & CONFLICT OF INTEREST REMINDER
Does any member have any known conflict of interest with respect to any matters coming before the board today? If so, please identify the conflict and refrain from any participation in the particular matter involved.
Please attend meeting via Zoom Link or Call In Number
I. Roll Call for TCC & TAC- Stephanie Harmon
II. Call the Meeting to Order– 3:00pm TAC Chair & TCC Chair
III. TCC Action Item I – Approval of June 25, 2020 meeting minutes
IV. TAC Action Item I- Approval of April 23, 2020 and June 25, 2020 meeting minutes
V. TAC/TCC Updates
P6.0 Final Draft Highway Project List - Stephanie Harmon
Amendment to KTRPO TAC Bylaws to Permit Remote Meetings & Voting- Stephanie Harmon i. Article V, Section 1, Section 4, & Section 7
VI. TCC/TAC Action Item II- Approval of P6.0 Draft Highway Project List
VII. TAC Action Item III- Approval of TAC Bylaw Amendments to Permit Remote Meetings & Voting
VIII. NCDOT Reports – Provided by NCDOT Division Engineer and Division Planning Engineer
IX. Other Business
X. Public Comment
XI. Adjourn – Thank you for your participation!
Tentative (Revised) 2020 KTRPO Meeting Schedule (3:00 – 5:00 PM) – Major Meeting Items
August 2020- No Meeting Scheduled September 2020 - No Meeting Scheduled
October 22, 2020 November 2020 – No Meeting Scheduled December 2020 – No Meeting Scheduled
*Please note, meeting dates are subject to change in order to accommodate NCDOT deadlines
Kerr-Tar RPO TAC/TCC Meeting Meeting Date: Thursday, April 23, 2020
Meeting Time: 4:00 PM- 5:00 PM Meeting Location: Virtual Meeting Via Conference Call
Due to COVID-19 Updates from Governor Cooper, the meeting time was delayed one hour.
Pursuant to NCGS §138A‐15 (e): ETHICS AWARENESS & CONFLICT OF INTEREST REMINDER
In accordance with the State Government Ethics Act, it is the duty of every TAC member to avoid conflicts of
interest. Does any TAC member have any known conflict of interest with respect to matters coming before the
TAC today? If so, please identify the conflict and refrain from any participation in the particular matter involved.
TCC Members Present (All Joined Via Phone): Mr. Ken Krulik, Planning Director, Warren County Planning, Zoning and Code Enforcement, and TCC Vice-Chair Ms. Diane Cox, Executive Director, Kerr-Tar Regional Council of Governments Mr. Michael Kelly, Planning Director, Kerr-Tar Regional Council of Governments Ms. Angela Blount, Planner, Vance County Planning and Development Mr. Bob Deaton, Corridor Development Engineer, NCDOT Division 5 Ms. Cheryl Hart, Planning Director, City of Oxford Ms. Lori Oakley, Planning Director, Person County Mr. G. Paylor Spruill, Assistant City Manager, City of Henderson Mr. Philip Geary, PE, Transportation Engineer III, NCDOT Ms. Lauren Johnson, Planning Director, City of Roxboro Mr. Joey Hopkins, PE, Division Engineer, NCDOT Division 5 Mr. Mike Ciriello, Planning and Recreation Director, Town of Butner Mr. Jason Rogers, Planning Administrator, Franklin County Planning and Inspections Mr. Tony L. King, Assistant Town & Zoning Administrator, Town of Louisburg Mr. Justin Jorgensen, Sr. Transportation Planner, Granville County Planning and Zoning Mr. Kurt Neufang, Transportation Director, Person Area Transportation System (PATS) Ms. Irene Johnson, Executive Director, Kerr Area Transportation Authority (KARTS) Mr. Harry Mills, Economic Development Director, Granville County Ms. Peggy Richardson, Economic Development Coordinator, Warren County Mr. Brooks Lockhart, Manager, City of Roxboro Mr. David Keilson, PE, Division Planning Engineer, NCDOT Division 5 TAC Members Present (All Joined Via Phone): Mr. Sidney Dunston, Franklin County Commissioner, and TAC Chair Mr. Tom Lane, Town of Butner Councilman, and TAC Vice-Chair Mr. Reggie Horton, City of Roxboro Councilman Mr. Jimmy Clayton, Person County Commissioner Ms. Emma Ruth Stewart, City of Louisburg Councilwoman Mr. Walter Gardner, Jr., Mayor Town of Warrenton
Kerr-Tar RPO Staff Present (All Joined Via Phone): Ms. Stephanie Harmon, RPO Coordinator I. Welcome and Call to Order
Due to the meeting being held by conference call, RPO Coordinator Stephanie Harmon completes a roll call for both the TCC and TAC to determine the number of attendees. TCC Vice-Chair Ken Krulik serves as the acting Chairman due to the fact TCC Chair Barry Baker is unable to attend. Recognizing quorums, TCC Acting Chair Krulik calls the TCC meeting to order and TAC Chair Dunston calls the TAC meeting to order.
II. TAC/TCC Action Item I - Receive and approve minutes from February 27, 2020 TAC.TCC meeting TCC Acting Chair Krulik recognizes the first order of business being approval of the February 27, 2020 TAC.TCC meeting minutes. TCC Acting Chair Krulik receives a motion from Cheryl Hart, a second from Lori Oakley, and the TCC vote in the affirmative to approve the previous meeting minutes. TCC Acting Chair Krulik carries the recommendation to the TAC. TAC Chair Sydney Dunston receives a motion from Emma Stewart, a second from Walter Gardner, and the TAC vote in the affirmative to approve the previous meeting minutes.
III. TAC/TCC Updates
TCC Acting Chair Krulik recognizes Stephanie Harmon to begin the updates.
P6.0 Project List and Modified Submittal Schedule Stephanie led the committee members in a review of a NCDOT memo describing a 3 month modification for the P6.0 process. The new deadline for RPOs to submit all projects into the SPOT system is now Friday, July 31st by 5pm. Stephanie then moved on to discussion about the highway project list for SPOT P6.0 submittal by the KTRPO. The KTRPO can submit 21 projects in each category and the current highway list has 34 highway projects. The draft highway project list was available for public review on the KTCOG website from Tuesday, March 10th to Wednesday, April 8th, no public comments were received by the KTRPO Staff during the 30 day window. The highway project list was presented for discussion only at this time, action on the final list will be taken at the next TAC/TCC meeting. Granville County decided to remove 2 highway projects from the possible submittal list (H140487-A & H170622).
Draft KTRPO PWP for FY’21 Stephanie led the committee members in a review of the draft KTRPO PWP for the new fiscal year beginning on July 1st. The TAC and TCC received a copy of the draft PWP at the February 27th meeting. The only changes since February have been meeting dates due to COVID-19.
IV. TCC/TAC Action Item II- Approval of Draft KTRPO PWP for FY’21
Acting TCC Chair Krulik calls for a vote to approve the KTRPO PWP FY’21 as presented. Acting TCC Chair Krulik receives a motion to approve from Mike Ciriello and a second from Tony King. The TCC vote in affirmative to approve the motion. Acting TCC Chair Krulik carries the recommendation to the TAC. TAC Chair Dunston calls for a vote to approve the KTRPO PWP FY’ 21 as presented. TAC Chair Dunston receives a motion to approve from Walter Gardner and a second from Jimmy Clayton. The TAC vote in the affirmative to approve the motion.
V. NCDOT Reports Acting TCC Chair Krulik recognizes Joey Hopkins to provide the Committees with updates on NCDOT’s budget deficiencies and the effect on current and future projects. Bob Deaton stated the information in his memo have been covered by Joey and had no further information to add.
VI. Other Business TCC Acting Chair Krulik recognizes Stephanie to discuss any additional items of business. Stephanie provided a reminder about the NCDOT Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning Grant and details of the next meeting in May.
VII. Public Comment
None to report. VIII. Adjourn
Hearing no further comments, Acting TCC Chair Krulik requests a motion to adjourn. Brooks Lockhart makes a motion to adjourn and it is seconded by Lori Oakley. All members of the TCC vote to adjourn. TAC Chair Dunston requested a motion to adjourn. Emma Stewart makes a motion to adjourn and it is seconded by Tom Lane. All members of the TAC vote to adjourn. There being no further business before the Committees, the meeting adjourns.
Kerr-Tar RPO TAC Bylaws, as amended January 2008 Page 1 of 4
Kerr-Tar Rural Transportation Planning Organization (RPO) Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) Bylaws
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ARTICLE I-NAME
The name of this committee shall be the Kerr-Tar Rural Transportation Planning Advisory Committee (TAC), hereinafter referred to as the TAC.
ARTICLE II-PURPOSE
The purpose and goals of this committee shall be to: 1. Develop long-range local and regional multi-modal transportation plans in cooperation the North Carolina
Department of Transportation (NCDOT). 2. Provide a forum for public participation in the rural transportation planning process. 3. Develop and prioritize suggestions for transportation projects that the Rural Planning Organization (RPO)
believes should be included in the State Transportation Improvement Program. 4. Provide transportation-related information to local governments and other interested organizations and
persons. 5. Conduct transportation related studies and surveys for local governments and other interested
entities/organizations. 6. Undertake mutually agreed upon transportation related tasks to enhance transportation system
development, coordination and efficiency.
ARTICLE III-MEMBERS Section 1-Memberhsip
As specified in the Kerr-Tar RPO Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Kerr-Tar RPO and North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT), the TAC shall consist of officials from local and state governmental agencies directly related to and concerned with the transportation planning process for the Kerr-Tar RPO planning area, which includes Person, Vance, and Warren Counties, portions of Franklin and Granville Counties, as well as the incorporated municipalities within each County that are members of the Kerr-Tar RPO. The initial voting membership shall include the following eleven (11) members:
One County Commissioner representing Franklin County. One municipal elected official representing the municipalities within Franklin County. The Mayors of the municipality within Franklin County that is a member of the Kerr-Tar RPO shall determine the elected official to represent the Franklin County municipality on the Kerr-Tar Rural Transportation Advisory Committee.
One County Commissioner representing Granville County. One municipal elected official representing the municipalities within Granville County. The Mayors of the municipalities within Granville County that are members of the Kerr-Tar RPO, shall meet jointly to determine the elected official to represent the Granville County municipalities on the Kerr-Tar Rural Transportation Advisory Committee. A majority vote of the Mayors shall determine the municipal representative.
One County Commissioner representing Person County. One municipal elected official representing the municipalities within Person County. The Mayor of the municipality within Person County that is a member of the Kerr-Tar RPO shall determine the elected official to represent the Person County municipality on the Kerr-Tar Rural Transportation Advisory Committee.
One County Commissioner representing Vance County. One municipal elected official representing the municipalities within Vance County. The Mayors of the municipalities within Vance County that are
Kerr-Tar RPO TAC Bylaws, as amended January 2008 Page 2 of 4
members of the Kerr-Tar RPO, shall meet jointly to determine the elected official to represent the Vance County municipalities on the Kerr-Tar Transportation Advisory Committee. A majority vote of the Mayors shall determine the municipal representative.
One County Commissioner representing Warren County. One municipal elected official representing the municipalities within Warren County. The Mayors of the municipalities within Warren County that are members of the Kerr-Tar RPO shall meet jointly to determine the elected official to represent the Warren County municipalities on the Kerr-Tar Transportation Advisory Committee. A majority vote of the Mayors shall determine the municipal representative.
The North Carolina Board of Transportation member representing the North Carolina Department of Transportation Division 5.
Section 2-Term of Membership
Term of office for all seats on the TAC is four years. Re-appointment is possible. To facilitate staggered terms and thereby promote continuity, the initial appointments from Franklin County and Warren County to the TAC shall be for one (1) year. All subsequent appointments shall be for four (4) years. Representatives from Vance, Granville and Person Counties shall be reappointed in odd-number years; representatives from Franklin and Warren Counties shall be reappointed in even-number years Section 3 – Alternates Each member may appoint an alternate to its representative as reflected in the membership roster. That alternate may serve as a full voting member during any meeting where that board’s primary representative is not in attendance. Absentee voting will not be permitted.
ARTICLE IV-OFFICERS
Section 1-Officers Defined
The officers of the TAC shall consist of a Chairman and a Vice-Chairman serving annual terms, but limited to two (2) consecutive terms. The Kerr-Tar COG Transportation Planner, as staff to the Kerr-Tar RPO, shall act as Secretary to the TAC.
Section 2-Duties of Officers
2.1 The Chairman shall call meetings of the TAC to order, and shall act as presiding officer of such meetings. The Chairman shall see that all orders and action items, including amendments, are carried into effect. The Chairman will:
Sign all official documents of the TAC.
Preside at all meetings of the TAC.
Decide all points of order or procedure.
Transmit all recommendations of the TAC to NCDOT.
With assistance from the Kerr-Tar COG Transportation Planner, draft the meeting agendas and make said available to the TAC members in a timely manner.
2.2 The Vice-Chairman shall conduct the duties of the Chairman in the event of the Chairman’s absence.
2.3 The administrative coordination for the TAC shall be performed by the Kerr-Tar COG Transportation Planner, as staff for the Kerr-Tar RPO. The Kerr-Tar RPO Transportation Planner shall:
Kerr-Tar RPO TAC Bylaws, as amended January 2008 Page 3 of 4
Keep minutes of the TAC meetings in proper form for the approval of the TAC at its next regular meeting.
Mail notices of regular meetings of the TAC, with a copy of the agenda, in accordance with Article V of these rules.
Give notice of special meetings called in accordance with North Carolina Open Meeting Law.
Maintain all files, records, and correspondence of the TAC.
2.4 Should neither the Chairman nor Vice-Chairman be able to preside at a meeting, the TAC shall appoint a Chairman Pro-Temp for that meeting nor until such time as the Chairman or Vice-Chairman can resume their responsibilities.
ARTICLE V-MEETINGS Section 1-Regular Meetings
The TAC shall meet when it is deemed necessary, appropriate, and advisable. The TAC shall meet on an as needed (on-call) basis as determined by the Chairman of the TAC and at a time to be determined by the Chairman of the TAC. Meeting notice and agenda are to be mailed no later than seven (7) days prior to a determined TAC meeting date. In the event of public health declaration or other disaster declaration by the State of North Carolina or the Federal Government, the TAC shall meeting via conference call or other virtual method (e.g. Zoom, GoToWebinar).
Section 2-Special Meetings
Special meetings may be called by the Chairman, or at the request of three (3) eligible voting members of the TAC petitioning the Chairman. Notice of special meetings shall be given in accordance with Open Meeting Laws of the North Carolina General Statues.
Section 3-Workshops
The TAC may choose to hold workshops from time to time. Notification of all workshops shall be mailed to TAC members in the same manner as regular meetings of the TAC.
Section 4-Attendance
TAC member are expected to attend each regular meeting and each special meeting of the TAC in person. If a TAC member is unable to attend a meeting, either in person or via conference call or other virtual method, notice should be given by the member to be absent, to the Kerr-Tar RPO Transportation Planner. TAC members are allowed to designate an alternate to attend meetings in their absence, providing such alternate member meets the same membership requirements as the absent member. Should a member fail to attend, or make arrangements for an alternate to attend, two (2) or more meetings in any one (1) fiscal year period (July to June), the TAC Chairman shall contact said member to discuss consideration of a replacement member for that unit of government or organization.
Section 5-Quorum A simple majority of eligible voting members or their alternates shall constitute a quorum. If a quorum is not established, the meeting shall be rescheduled. All business (action and no action items) will not be discussed until a quorum is established at the meeting.
Section 6 -- Agenda The agenda is a list of considerations for discussion at a meeting. Any member of the TAC can place items on the agenda prior to its distribution, by notifying the TAC Chairman and/or the Kerr-Tar RPO Transportation Planner.
Kerr-Tar RPO TAC Bylaws, as amended January 2008 Page 4 of 4
Additional items may be placed on the regular agenda at the beginning of the TAC meeting on the date of the meeting, if approved by a majority vote of the present and eligible voting members. Section 7-Voting Procedures:
The Chairman may call for a vote on any issue, provided that it is seconded and within the purposes set forth in Article II and provided the issue is on the agenda as outlined in Section 6 of this article. Each voting member of the TAC shall have one (1) vote. A majority vote of the members (or their authorized alternates) present in person or attending via conference call or other virtual method, and eligible to vote, shall be sufficient for approval of matters coming before the TAC. The Chairman is permitted to vote. In the event of a tie, where the Chairman has already voted, the Chairman cannot vote again to break the tie and the motion does not pass. Abstentions on issues requiring a vote is permitted, provided members desiring to abstain obtain approval by the TAC for said abstention by a majority vote of the TAC members present. Any member present and not voting shall be recorded as a positive vote on the motion. In the absence of any direction from these Bylaws or other duly adopted voting procedures pursuant to certain approval actions, Robert’s Rules of Order will designate procedures governing voting.
ARTICLE VI-AMENDMENTS TO BYLAWS
Amendments to these Bylaws shall require the affirmative vote of a majority of the TAC’s eligible voting members, provided that written notice of the proposed amendment has been mailed seven (7) days prior to the meeting at which the amendment is to be considered and provided that such amendment does not conflict with the letter or fundamental intent of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for the Kerr-Tar RPO, which is the governing document for these By-Laws. In the event of any conflict, the MOU shall carry precedence over these By-Laws.
The Kerr-Tar RPO Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) approved these By-Laws on the 21st day of May 2002. Amendments to these Bylaws were approved on the _28___ day of ___January____, 2008. Amendments to these Bylaws were approved on the ____________________________________
Sidney Dunston
Chairman
Kerr-Tar RPO TAC
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Stephanie Harmon
Secretary
Kerr-Tar RPO TAC
Statewide Funding Tier Score Ranking P6 Estimated Score P6 Estimated Score P6 Estimated Score
Projects are Arranged in Order from Highest Score (in that Funding Tier) to Lowest Score (in that Funding Tier)
SPOT ID TIP Project Category RouteFrom / Cross
StreetTo Description
Specific
Improvement TypeCost to NCDOT
Statewide Mobility
Quantitative Score
(Out of 100)
Regional Impact
Quantitative Score
(Out of 70)
Division Needs
Quantitative Score
(Out of 50)
County Notes
H171085 Statewide Mobility US 158
US 158 Loop at
Williamsboro Street
in Oxford
I-85
Widen US 158 as a
modification of H149004. The
project has been shortened
to where it has the highest
volume.
1 - Widen Existing
Roadway$9,700,000
P6 Estimated Score =
65.3665
P5 Score = 65.87
P6 Estimated Score =
49.488 P5
Score = 46.26
P6 Estimated Score =
38.73 P5
Score = 38.81
Granville
P6 Score. Scores higher as a
widening than a
modernization.
Score as Modernization =
49.81 / 34.25 / 27.22
H170329 Statewide Mobility US 158 Bypass US 158 BusinessAdd northeast bound left
turn lane
10 - Improve
Intersection$600,000
P6 Estimated Score =
45.079
P6 Estimated Score =
31.669
P6 Estimated Score =
20.041Warren P6 Score
H171164 Statewide MobilityUS 158 (New Route -
Roxboro Bypass)
US 158 west of
Roxboro
US 158 east of
Roxboro
This project is part of
H090152. The New Location
is referenced in the Person
County CTP on page C-13
and is referenced as R-2585.
The project is estimated to
be 3.6 miles in length.
5 - Construct Roadway
on New Location$27,600,000
P6 Estimated Score =
41.3405
P6 Estimated Score =
26.797
P6 Estimated Score =
20.0655Person P6 Score
H192538 Statewide US 158 Business US 158 Business
SR 1107
Ridgeway-
Warrenton Road
Improve lanes, shoulders 16 - Modernize Road $3,659,000Estimated P6 Score =
40.98
Estimated P6 Score =
31.41
Estimated P6 Score =
22.97Warren
Regional Funding Tier Score Ranking P6 Estimated Score
Projects are Arranged in Order from Highest Score (in that Funding Tier) to Lowest Score (in that Funding Tier)
SPOT ID TIP Project Category RouteFrom / Cross
StreetTo Description
Specific
Improvement TypeCost to NCDOT
Statewide Mobility
Quantitative Score
(Out of 100)
Regional Impact
Quantitative Score
(Out of 70)
Division Needs
Quantitative Score
(Out of 50)
County Notes
H171084 Regional Impact US 501SR 1521 (Halifax
Road)
SR 1329 (Old NC
501)
Modernize this segment of
US 501. This project is a
modernization version of
H090073-B (TIP R-2241B)
16 - Modernize
Roadway$15,200,000 N/A
P6 Estimated Score =
51.902 / P5
Score = 33.66
P6 Estimated Score =
38.977 /
P5 Score = 27.04
PersonP6 Modernization Score is
improved from P5 scoring.
H170486 Regional ImpactUS 1 BUS (Raleigh
Road)
Old County Home
Road, Belmont DriveImprove intersection
10 - Improve
Intersection$1,300,000 N/A
P6 Estimated Score
48.232 /
P5=47.90
P6 Estimated Score
35.2635 /
P5= 38.38
Vance P6
H149005 Regional Impact US 1, US 158Satterwhite Point
Road
Ridgeway Drewry
RoadWiden Roadway
1 - Widen Existing
Roadway$79,800,000 N/A
P6 Estimated Score
Widening = 41.87/
P6 Modernization = 30.94
P6 Estimated Score
Widening = 32.55/
P6 Modernization =
23.25
Vance/WarrenScores better in P6 as a
Widening than in P6 as a
Modernization.
Version: July 23, 2020A Total of 21 Slots are Available to be filledKerr Tar P6 Project List for
2020
SPOT ID TIP Project Category RouteFrom / Cross
StreetTo Description
Specific
Improvement TypeCost to NCDOT
Statewide Mobility
Quantitative Score
(Out of 100)
Regional Impact
Quantitative Score
(Out of 70)
Division Needs
Quantitative Score
(Out of 50)
County Notes
H171083 Regional ImpactUS 1 Business (Raleigh
Road)US 1 Bypass
SR 1267 (Dabney
Drive)
Modernize this section of US
1 BUS. This is the same
section as H090097-widen
existing roadway. This is a
modernization version.
16 - Modernize
Roadway$15,400,000 N/A
P6 Estimated Score
Modernization = 40.7725 /
P6 Widening = 31.10
P6 Estimated Score
Modernization = 34.918 /
P6 Widening = 24.81
Vance P6
H170622 Regional Impact US 15 (US 15)SR 1514 (Chewning
Road)
US 158 (Oxford
Loop Road)
Widen roadway to 3 lanes
from Chewning Road to US
158 Oxford Loop Road in
Oxford. The 2008 Granville
county CTP proposes 4
lanes, but this will be less
expensive and will require
less ROW.
16 - Modernize
Roadway$23,800,000 N/A
P6 Estimated Score
Modernization = 40.06 /
P6 Widening = 28.73
P6 Estimated Score
Modernization = 32.28
/ P6 Widening = 19.33
Granville P6
H172185 Regional ImpactHenderson Citywide
Signal SystemITS
13 - Citywide Signal
System$3,368,000 N/A P 5 Score = 39.657 P5 Score = 32.0245 Division 5 P5 Score
H170619 Regional Impact NC 39 Burnette Road
Upgrade existing
intersection with Burnette
Road
10 - Improve
Intersection$1,800,000 N/A
P6 Estimated Score =
38.882
P6 Estimated Score =
31.0225Granville
H150970 Regional ImpactNC 96 Business (Broad
Street, Linden Ave)Industry Drive
North of 3rd
Street
Road Diet on NC 96 from
Industry Drive to North of 3rd
Street
24 - Implement Road
Diet to Improve Safety$2,100,000 N/A
P6 Estimated Score =
37.615
P6 Estimated Score =
29.4915Granville
Slight change in score due to
P6 Criteria changes.
H170616 Regional Impact NC 49 (Virgilina Road)SR 1521/ Halifax
Road
Upgrade and improve
intersection at NC 49
(Virgilina Road) and SR 1521
(Halifax Road)
10 - Improve
Intersection$700,000 N/A
P6 Estimated Score =
36.224
P6 Estimated Score =
29.184Person
H090819-A Regional ImpactNew Route - Henderson
Western Outer Loop
SR 1101 (Old County
Home Road)
US 1 Business
(Raleigh Road)
6 - Construct 2 Lane
Roadway, Part on New
Location. Continuation of
the Western Outer Loop.
6 - Widen Existing
Roadway and
Construct Part on New
Location
$26,700,000 N/A
P6 Estimated Score =
34.223 / P5
= 32.51
P6 Estimated Score =
26.615 /
P5 = 30.18
VanceSlight change in score due to
P6 Criteria changes.
H192514 Regional US 501SR 1329 (Old NC
501)
North of Virginia
State LineModernize Roadway 16 - Modernize Road $6,247,000 N/A
Estimated P6 Score =
28.88
Estimated P6 Score =
18.21Person
This is a modernization
version of H090073-C
H192554 Regional NC 75 (SR1004)Veazey Road (SR
1174)
Amed Road (SR
1624)
Improve lanes, shoulders,
minor geometric
deficiencies.
16 - Modernize Road $2,767,000 N/AEstimated P6 Score =
20.09
Estimated P6 Score =
12.64 Granville
H192552 RegionalCentral Ave (SR 1103),
in Butner
Veazey Road (SR
1174)
I-85 Service Road
(SR 1209)
Road Diet on Central Ave in
Butner to improve safety and
add bike/ped facilities.
24 Road Diet to
improve safety$13,628,000 N/A No Scores yet No Scores yet Granville
P6 Estimated Score
Projects are Arranged in Order from Highest Score (in that Funding Tier) to Lowest Score (in that Funding Tier)
SPOT ID TIP Project Category RouteFrom / Cross
StreetTo Description
Specific
Improvement TypeCost to NCDOT
Statewide Mobility
Quantitative Score
(Out of 100)
Regional Impact
Quantitative Score
(Out of 70)
Division Needs
Quantitative Score
(Out of 50)
County Notes
H090782 Division Needs SR 1001 Henderson WarrentonWiden to 12-Foot Lanes from
Henderson to Warrenton.
16 - Modernize
Roadway$29,000,000 N/A N/A
P6 Estimated Score =
26.623Warren/Vance Similar score to P5 scoring
Division Funding Tier Score Ranking
SPOT ID TIP Project Category RouteFrom / Cross
StreetTo Description
Specific
Improvement TypeCost to NCDOT
Statewide Mobility
Quantitative Score
(Out of 100)
Regional Impact
Quantitative Score
(Out of 70)
Division Needs
Quantitative Score
(Out of 50)
County Notes
H192535 Division Central / Lake Holt
Road, ButnerOld NC 75 (SR 1004) Improve intersection
10- upgrade and
improve intersection$1,430,000 N/A N/A
Estimated P6 Score =
21.1Granville
H192526 Division Central Ave (SR 1103),
in Butner
Veazey Road (SR
1174)Improve intersection
10- upgrade and
improve intersection$1,674,000 N/A N/A
Estimated P6 Score =
16.53Granville
H171078 Division NeedsSR 1649 (New
Commerce Drive)
End of SR 1649 (New
Commerce Drive)
SR 1607 (Knotts
Grove Road)
Construct an extension of
New Commerce Drive (SR
1649) to tie in to Knotts
Grove Road (SR 1607). This
project is included in the
new Granville County CTP
Update, which is due to be
adopted in late 2017 or early
2018.
5 - Construct Roadway
on New Location$5,400,000 N/A N/A
P6 Estimated Score =
12.682Granville Similar score to P5 scoring
SPOT ID TIP Project Category RouteFrom / Cross
StreetTo Description
Specific
Improvement TypeCost to NCDOT
Statewide Mobility
Quantitative Score
(Out of 100)
Regional Impact
Quantitative Score
(Out of 70)
Division Needs
Quantitative Score
(Out of 50)
County Notes
H192539 Statewide US 158 Business Country Club RoadUS 158 Bypass
near MaconImprove lanes, shoulders 16 - Modernize Road $7,513,000
Estimated P6 Score =
26.24
Estimated P6 Score =
18.64
Estimated P6 Score =
11.07Warren
H192541 Regional NC 49 Burlington RoadHesters Store Road
(SR 1162)
Lake Shore Drive
(SR 1194) Improve lanes, shoulders 16 - Modernize Road $2,916,000 N/A
Estimated P6 Score =
15.02
Estimated P6 Score =
9.05Person
H192542 U-5829 Division 26th Street Butner (SR
1219)
Wilkins Road (SR
1107)
East Lyon Station
Road (SR 1104)
Upgrade and extend
roadway, including a grade
separation over I-85
6 - Widen Existing
Roadway and
construct part on new
location
$18,437,000 N/A N/A No Scores yet Granville
H192555 Statewide I-85Exit 183 Redwood
Road
Exit 186 A / Gate 1
Road
Widen I-85 to accommodate
increasing traffic
1 - Widen Existing
Roadway$38,262,000 No Scores yet No Scores yet No Scores yet Granville/ Durham
H192563 Statewide US 158 BypassUs 158 Business
(Norlina)
Us 158 Business
near MaconImprove lanes, shoulders 16 - Modernize Road $7,116,000
Estimated P6 Score =
34.98
Estimated P6 Score =
24.88
Estimated P6 Score =
15.11Warren
H192515 RegionalMLK Jr. and Hillsboro
Street - OxfordImprove intersection
10 - upgrade and
improve intersection$1,430,000 N/A No Scores yet No Scores yet Granville
H090017 Statewide Mobility I-85 US 1Provide Additional Traffic
Movements
8 - Improve
Interchange$24,200,000
P6 Estimated Score
46.8895
P6 Estimated Score
27.374
P6 Estimated Score
15.4425Vance P6 Score
H170496 Statewide Mobility I-85 US 1 Improve interchange8 - Improve
Interchange$6,000,000
P6 Estimated Score =
46.6165
P6 Estimated Score =
30.363
P6 Estimated Score =
20.8615Vance P6 Score
H090073-C R-2241-C Regional Impact US 501SR 1329 (Old NC
501)
To just North of
Virginia State
Line
Widen to Multi-Lanes1 - Widen Existing
Roadway$25,800,000 N/A
P6 Modernization = 34.20
/ P6
Widening = 23.43
P6 Modernization =
27.20 /
P6 Widening = 18.96
PersonScores better in P6 as a
Modernization than in P6 as a
Widening.
Projects Below Will NOT be Submitted for this P6 SPOT
Cycle;This is the Discard List.
SPOT ID TIP Project Category RouteFrom / Cross
StreetTo Description
Specific
Improvement TypeCost to NCDOT
Statewide Mobility
Quantitative Score
(Out of 100)
Regional Impact
Quantitative Score
(Out of 70)
Division Needs
Quantitative Score
(Out of 50)
County Notes
H150761 Regional Impact US 15Belltown Rd., SR
1133Industry Drive
Widen 1.5 miles of US-15
from Belltown Rd (near I-85
near Walmart in Oxford) to
Industry Drive
16 - Modernize
Roadway$21,200,000 N/A
P6 Estimated
Modernization = 31.91 /
P6 Estimated Widening =
27.20
P6 Estimated Score
Modernization = 28.35 /
P6 Widening = 24.46
Granville
*Scores are very close
whether as a
Modernization/Widening or
Access Management
improvements.
H090073-B R-2241-B Regional Impact US 501SR 1521 (Halifax
Road)
SR 1329 (Old NC
501)
Widen to Multi-Lanes, Part
on New Location
1 - Widen Existing
Roadway$42,700,000 N/A
P6 Estimated Score
Widening = 31.27 P5
Score = 23.72
P6 Estimated Score
Widening = 24.76 P5
Score = 15.82
PersonScores better in P6 as a
Modernization than in P6 as a
Widening.
H170493 Regional Impact US 1 US 401, US 158Add turn lane at intersection
in Norlina
10 - Improve
Intersection$800,000 N/A
P6 Estimated Score =
31.045
P6 Estimated Score =
22.0205Warren
Slight improvement in P6
scoring over P5 due to
criteria.
H090813 Regional Impact NC 56Mays Crossroads
Road
Peach Orchard
RoadWiden to 4 Lanes 16-Modernize Roadway $55,900,000 N/A
P6 Estimated Score
Modernization = 34.70
/P6 Widening = 22.35
P6 Estimated Score
Modernization = 27.09
/P6 Widening = 15.68
Franklin
P6 Scores better as a
modernization than a
widening under the P6
criteria. P6 score as Widening
is 22.35/ 15.68
SPOT ID TIP Project Category RouteFrom / Cross
StreetTo Description
Specific
Improvement TypeCost to NCDOT
Statewide Mobility
Quantitative Score
(Out of 100)
Regional Impact
Quantitative Score
(Out of 70)
Division Needs
Quantitative Score
(Out of 50)
County Notes
H170618 R-5893 Regional Impact NC 56 Peach Orchard Road US 401
Widen roadway. The project
is a modification of H090813
(NC56 from Fanklinton
Bypass to US 401/NC 56 in
Louisburg, NC where the
proposal is to widen to 4
lanes. This abbreviated
project shortens the length
of the project and widens to
4-lanes, and is located
entirely in KTRPO.
1 - Widen Existing
Roadway$18,500,000 N/A P5 Score = 50.22 P5 Score = 39.70 Franklin
This project is a CARRYOVER
project, meaning that it has
made the STIP, but is not yet
secured funding, so it must
be re-submitted.
H170689 Division Needs SR 1162 (Dabney Drive)South of South
Beckford Drive US 158 Bypass
Upgrade Dabney Drive (SR
1162) from the end of U-5890
corridor upgrade from south
of South Beckford Drive to
US 158 Bypass. This access
management project should
include planted medians and
sidewalks as well as bike
lanes.
11 - Access
Management$14,800,000 N/A N/A
P6 Estimated Score =
32.83Vance
Slight change in score due to
P6 Criteria changes.
Carryover Projects- These do not count towards our
submittals