Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DOES MY PATIENT NEED
FLUID?
Value of mean systemic filling
pressure
Antoine Vieillard-Baron, Boulogne, France
Disclosures
• Baxter
• GSK
I
Physiology
Am J Physiol 1957
SVR = MSFP – RAP/RVR
Am J Physiol 1954
Dogs
Ventricular fibrillation
MSFP is defined as the pressure generated by the elastic
recoil in the overall systemic circulation during a no-flow state
MSFP (the forward pressure)
Guyton, Am J Physiol 1957
2 determinants
- Vasomotor tone (the “container”)
- Blood volume (the “contents”)
THE “STRESSED”
VOLUME
Epinephrine Fluid expansion
Clinical death and the measurement of stressed vascular volume.Magder S
Critical Care Medicine 1998
The average stressed volume was 1290 +/- 296
mL or 20.2 +/- 1.0 mL/kg. If one assumes a
normal blood volume of 65 mL/kg for women
and 69 mL/kg for men, this estimate gives an
average of 30 +/- 17% of the total predicted
blood volume.
7 surgical patients requiring cardiopulmonary bypass
“Bathtub” model
RAP (the backward pressure)
Am J Physiol 2017
Fessler HE Am Rev Respir Dis 1991
Nanas and Magder 1992
RESISTANCE TO VR
Am J Physiol 2016
Intensive Care Med 2004
II
Limitations in the ICU
(i)
Accurate measurement of MSFP
in heart-beating patients
Crit Care Med 2012
3 assumptions
• 1- Resistance to VR is constant during
mechanical ventilation
• 2- CO and SVR are similar, which means
that cardiac function does not change during
mechanical ventilation
J Appl Physiol 1999
3 assumptions
• 1- Resistance to VR is constant during
mechanical ventilation
• 2- CO and SVR are similar, which means
that cardiac function does not change during
mechanical ventilation
• 3- MSFP is not sensitive to change in intra-
thoracic pressure
Berger, Takala, Am J Physiol 2016
Jellinek H, JAP 2000
J Appl Physiol 2017
(ii)
Application of the concept in
critically-ill patients
Am J Physiol 2015
202 patients
MSFP 12.8 ± 5.6 mmHg
III
Published studies in fluid
“guiding”
Guérin, Crit Care 2015
Conclusion
• Too many limitations for using MSFP and the
driving pressure for venous return in clinical
practice
• Probably more suitable to train residents and
fellows to cardiopulmonary physiology which is
key for well-manage fluids requirement
• Look at the SVC to have an evaluation of the
resistance to venous return which is probably the
most important parameter with CVP