Upload
dollysood19
View
250
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
1/26
Chapter 1
1. INTRODUCTION:
The nuclear physics is one of the most extensively studied fields. It has beendifferentiated in 4 major branches:
One of the branch discuss about deconfinement and quark-gluon plasma.
Second branch deals with study of-ray spectroscopy.
The third branch led to the study of nuclear collectivity through giant resonances
and lastly, the branch that deals with the study of intermediate energy heavy ion
collision. In last two decades, a lot of efforts have been made experimentally aswell as theoretically to understand the nuclear physics at intermediate energies
which ranges between 10A MeV and 2A GeV.
1.1 HEAVY ION COLLISIONS
The term heavy ion is used for the nucleous more massive than helium. The branch of
physics which deals with the phenomenon that occur when two heavy nuclei are
brought into close contact such that nuclear forces that hold the neutrons and protons
together within the nucleous are felt by other nucleons is called heavy ion physics [Bha-
71, Pri-62,Holf-95 ,Bro-72]
Heavy ion physics has attracted much attention during the last three decades. The
behavior of heavy nucleous under extreme conditions of temprature.,density, angular
momentum etc. is a very important aspect of heavy ion physics .
A large no. of accelerators have been developed to study these heavy ion reactions
[Sche-05, Bart-05] The energy of accelerated heavy ions is usually classified intofollowing three groups :
Low energy (E 20 MeV/nucleons )
Intermediate Energy ( 10MeV E 2 GeV/nucleons )
1
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
2/26
Relativistic Energy ( E 200 MeV/neucleons )
There are so many theoretical models to study heavy ion collisions at these different
energies such as TDHF model which is applecable for collisions at low energies. INC
model applicable at high energies, BUU and QMD models work at intermediateenergies.Here we will study these models in detail.
1.2 Review of theoretical models
Theoretically several models have been developed to explain some of observed heavy
ion phenomenon. The heavy ion collisions involve very complicated non- equilibriumphysics. Due to lack of free space at low incident energies about 98% of the attempted
collisions are blocked. The whole dynamics at low energies is governed by the mean
field or by the mutual two or three body collisions. At relativistic energy(2A GeV ) Pauli
principle play role quite small(roughly 4%collisions are blocked)and hence the
dynamics of reaction is governed by Cascade picture. On the other hand both cascade
and mean field picture emerges at intermediate energies.
The conventional theories like the time dependent Hartree- Fock(TDHF)or semiclassical version the so called Vlasov equation is suitable approach at low energies,
where nucleon- nucleon collisions are negligible. A suitable approach for intermediate
energy heavy ion physics should treat the nucleon- nucleon collisions and the mean
field on equal footing. Some attempts were made in the literature to extend the TDHF to
take care of residual nucleon- nucleon (NN) interactions which are responsible for two
body collisions.(this was dubbed as ETDHF). However, due to complications, this theory
could not be used for large scale investigations.
In first attempt, the semi classical version of ETDHF(i.e Vlasov equation)
[1,2,3,4,5]was coupled with nucleon-nucleon collisions and thus a new realization
named as Boltzmann-Uehling-Uhlenbeck equation (BUU) is used till date to study the
large deviating problems of low, intermediate and relativistic heavy ion collisions. Many
more names like Landau-Vlasov (LV) equation or Vlasov Uehling-Uhlenbeck(VUU) Or
2
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
3/26
Boltzmann Nordheim equation also exist for same realization. The solution of BUU
equation provides the time evaluation of one body distribution function in six
dimensional phase space. In actual calculations , one does not solve the Boltzmann
Uehling-Uhlenbeck(BUU)[2,6,8,,9] equation directly, instead one solves the classical
hamiltonian equations of motion for propagation of particles in mean field . Due to one
body nature BUU can not describe correctly, for example the multi fregmentation
phenomenon which involve the correlations between nucleons. Recently, some
attempts were made to extend the equation by including stochastic two -body
correlations so that the N body phenomenon like multifregmentation can be studied.
[10,11,12,13]
Basically there are three different microscopical realizations: the Intra Nuclear Cascade
(INC) Quantum Molecular Dynamics (QMD) and the BoltzmanUehlingUhlenbeckmodel (BUU) In the INC model the nucleusnucleus collision is simulated as the sum of
all individual nucleonnucleon collisions without taking into account self consistent
meanfield potentials and Pauli blocking for the collisions.The QMD follows the same
scheme as the INC, but takes into account the Pauli blocking in the collisions and a
nucleus potential which is calculated as the sum of all twobody potentials.
3
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
4/26
CHAPTER 2
2 Methodologies
2.1 TIME DEPENDENT HARTREE FOCK THEORY
The time dependent Hartree Fock theory is a quantum mechanical theory which is used
to describe the low energy heavy Ion collisions. A no of different physical situations
have been studied: fission, heavy ion fussion and heavy inelastic collisions
The time dependent Hartree Fock theory is based on the assumption of independent
particle behaviour for the near equilibrium situations if the excitation energy is less than
10A MeV .
The TDHF describes the many body wave function by a single slatter determinant.
Since the heavy ion collision is a time dependent process, it is more convenient to use
the time dependent schrodinger equation. The wave function for the system at any time
t is given
(t)> = |(0)> (1)
Where H is many body Hamiltonian given by
H = T + V = + (2)
The state > contains all the information of the system , which we need for a good
description of the dynamics .We often need only expection values of one body
observables , such as the position of the fregments , their shapes and particle numbers.
These quantities are determined from one body density matrix with elements
=
The expectation value of one body observable is given as =
4
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
5/26
The first step towards the TDHF theory is to restrict the description to one body
observable, and to seek for an equation giving the evaluation to .
Starting from eq(1) and using the ( BBGKY) Hierarchy [14-15] we can show that the
one body density matrix follows [16]
I = [h[] , ] + C(1 ,2 ) ] (3)
Where h[] is the HF single particle Hamiltonian with matrix element
= < i| h[] | j >
= < | H |>
And C is the correlated part of the two body density matrix.
The eq.(3) is exact but has two unknown quantities : and C.
The equation of motion shows that one body density matrix is related to two body
density matrix. Similarly equation of motion for two body density matrix is related to
three body density matrix , and so on. This series of equations is called BBGKY
(Bogoliubov-bonn-Green-Kirkwood-Yvon) hierarchy which is equivalent to the fullsolution of the time dependent schrodinger equation. To reduce this equation to one
body equation, we have to introduce some approximation. The TDHF assumes
= -
The second step towards the TDHF equation is to neglect the second term of right hand
side in eq(3). This can be done in two alternative ways :
The correlation C vanishes if we impose |> to be an independent particles stateat any time.
The truncation of the BBGKY hierarchy can also be done by neglecting the
residual interaction
5
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
6/26
= (i)
This is a mean-field approximation because the Hamiltonian is approximated by a one-
body operator . In this case, a system described by a Slater determinantat an initial time will be an independent particles state at any time.
We finally get the TDHF equation I = =[h[] , ]
Where is now the one-body density matrix of an independent particles state. The
operator associated to acts in the Hilbert space of single-particle states. It is written
= >< | where denotes an occupied single-particle
state.
The TDHF theory neglects the pairing correlations which are contained in C. In fact,
TDHF describes occupied single-particle wave functions in the mean field generated by
all the particles and obeys the Pauli principle during the dynamics.
RESULTS
In this work, we focus on head-on collisions of two heavy-ions and take the collision
direction as the x axis. Following Ref. [19], we define center-of-mass coordinateR, total
momentum P and mass number A of projectile-like (+) and target-like () fragments
by introducing the separation plane. The separation plane can be conveniently defined
as the plane at position where isocontours of projectile-like and target-like densities
cross each other. We indicate position of the separation plane, i.e., position of the
window at X = . Illustration of density profiles and separation plane locations are
displayed at different times of the symmetric reaction 40Ca+40Ca
6
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
7/26
in Fig. 1.
Fig .1 Density profile ( x,y,0) with TDHF for the + reacton of = 100
MeV at different R. The iso-densities are plotted energy
Advantages
The time dependent Hartree Fock theory is used to describe the low
energy heavy Ion collisions.
7
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
8/26
The TDHF has been applied to study different physical processes with
bombarding energies upto 10A MeV.
The TDHF Iis also able to explain the fussion , compound nucleous
formation, dissipation, shock wave propagation and fragmentation.
Disadvantages:
TDHF Theory does not include the effect of nucleon-nucleon collisions al low
energy.
Here fluctuations and correlations were not present because the nucleons
behave independently.
Some attempts are also made in in the literature to extend the TDHF equation to
include the residual nucleon- nucleon (NN) interactions which are responsible for
two body collisions. This is called as extended time dependent Hartree Fock
(ETDHF) equation. Unfortunately ETDHF is too complicated to be used for large
scale investigations in heavy ion collisions [17]
2.2 Intra nuclear cascade model (INC)
At intermediate energies, the mean field and the two body nucleon- nucleon collisions
play an equally important role in the evaluation of the system.
Assumption
The Cascade model simulates the heavy ion collisions as a superposition of
independent two body NN collisions. Naturally in the absence of mean field, the
nucleons move on straight line trajectories until they collide.
In INC model each nucleon is considered as a collection of point particles distributed
within a sphere without any fermi momentum.
When two nuclei approach each other, the position of each nucleon ( within a sphere) is
assigned by Monti -carlo sampling. The time evolution is followed by dividing the whole
8
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
9/26
reaction time into the small intervals . Two nucleons are supposed to collide if they
pass the point of closest approach is with ( as the total
nucleon nucleon cross section in their center of mass system and is the center of
mass energy. The colliding particles can also scatter elastically or inelastically.
Elastic:
Inelastic:
The cross sections for channels (a) and (b) are taken from experiments . the cross
section for channel (e) is obtained by detailed balance method . The cross sections for
channels (b) and (c) are taken to be same as (a).
At the end of simulations, all s decay isotropically into nucleons and pions by
conserving the charge, isospin quantum number. In other words the number of s at the
end of reaction gives the number of pions.
One can also calculate the entropy generated in a nuclear system after the collision.
The entropy for noninteracting Fermionic system is given by
S = d [ f ln f + (1 - f )ln (1 - f ) ] ,
Here f is the occupation probability in the phase space which is given by f = With R
being totel number of events and N are the number of particles in a given cell
The d in the phase space volume element given by
d = 4 .
To calculate the f, the whole phase space is divided into cells i. the distribution function f
is then estimated by relatation
=
The INC gave excellent opportunity to extract lnformation about several experimental
observables [11]. As the INC does not contain the mean free field of nucleons , it is
9
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
10/26
more suitable for high energy experiments . The other models which include the mean
field as well as the nucleon-nucleon collisions are based on Based on Boltzmann-
Uehling-Uhlenbeck (BUU) equation.
Merits and Demarits
The intranuclear cascade model is capable of describing the high energy heavy
ion collisions.
In this model the mean field is completely neglected and the nucleon-nucleon
(NN) Collisions are taken without Pauli blocking .
Note that this was the first microscopic dynamical model used to understand the
experimental data of heavy ion collisions.
2.3 Introduction to BUU model
The Boltzmann-Ueling-Uhlenbeck (BUU) model is a semi-classical transport model that
is used to study nuclear collisions. The colliding nuclei are represented as individual test
particles (nucleons) which follow classical trajectories in a nuclear mean field potential,
which contains information about the nuclear EoS. Classical billiard-ball collisions may
occur if two nucleons pass close enough to one another. The Pauli-exclusion principle is
employed and forbids any collision which would cause more than one nucleon to
occupy the same state.
The dynamical description of nucleus-nucleus reactions is based on the equation ofmotion.
+ v. f - U. f = d
10
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
11/26
{ [ f ( 1 - )(1 - (1 - f ) ( 1 -
) ]
( p + ) }
The right hand side denotes the collision integral which also include the pauli blocking .
This equation is solved by test particle method .Here the phase- space of each nucleon
is represented by large number of pseudo particles( called test particles ).In its
numerical implementation , the above equation reduces to a set of 6 ( ) N
couple of first order differential equation in time . Here N is the number of test particles
per nucleon, and A are the target and projectile, respectively. The test particle method
replaces the expectation value of a single particle observable;
= f (r, p, t) O (r, p) r p ,
By a Monte Carlo integration
= (t) , (t) ) ,
With r(t) and p(t) denote the points in phase space which are distributed according to
f(r,p,t)
f(r,p,t) = lim (r-r(t))(p-(t))
It is obvious that a large number of test particles will be needed to avoid the numerical
noise. These test particles are treated as classical point particles. In recent calculations,
one has also succeeded to use the gaussians wave packets for test particles. These
particles are then propagated under the classical hamiltonians equation of motion.
= -
=
One should also keep in mind that the forces acting on test particles are calculated
from the entire distribution which includes the test particles of all events. In other words,
the n parallel events are inter- connected and an event by event correlations cannot be
11
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
12/26
analyzed within these models. In the limit n the distribution of these test particles
represents a true one body distribution function. The BUU model is able to explain the
one body observables like collective flow stopping and particle spectra, nicely. Due to
the lack of fluctuations and correlations, the N body predictions are beyond the scope of
these models. The N body features can be described nicely with molecular dynamics
models. In the following we discuss the quantum molecular dynamics (QMD) model in
detail.
2.4 Quantum molecular dynamics (QMD) modelThe quantum molecular dynamics (QMD) model is based on an event by event m
ethod.Here each nucleon interacts via two or three body interactions that preserve thenucleon -2 correlations and fluctuations that are important for N-body phenomena like
multifragmentation. This is in contrast to the one- body dynamical models which are
suitable for one-body observable only.
QMD model needs these steps:
First, one has to generate the nuclei. This procedure is called initialization.
These nucleons then propagate under the influence of surrounding mean field.
This is termed as propagation.
Finally, nucleons are bound to collide if they come too close to each other . This
part is dubbed as collision.
In this we shall disscuss each of these parts.
Initialization
Here each nucleon is represented by Gaussian wave packet or by acoherent state of form
(r , (t), (t)) = exp [ (t). r - ]
12
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
13/26
The parameter L, which is related to the extension of the wave packet in phase space,
is fixed. The totel N body function is assumed to be a direct product of the coherent
states.
= ( r , , , t)
Note that we do not use a Slater determinant (with ( + ) Summation terms) and thus,
neglect antisymmetrization. First successful attempts to simulate the heavy- ion reaction
with antisymmertrized states have been performed for smaller systems. A consistent
derivation of the QMD equation of motion for the wave function under the influence of
real and imaginary part of the constant cross section (G- Matrix), is however, missing.
Therefore we shall add the imaginary part as a cross section and treat the collision in
cascade approach.
The Wigner transform of the coherent states with ( + ) nucleons is given by
(r, p, (t) (t)) =
Where (t) and (t) define the center of gaussian wave packet in phase space,
whereas the squared width L is assumed to be independent of the time. The density of
particle is
(r) = (r ,p , (t) , (t) ) p ,
=
To initialize a nucleus, we have to assign the coordinates and momenta of all nucleons.
In three dimensional spaces inside a sphere of radius R= 1.14 , Where A is the
number of nucleons of nucleus under consideration], The center of gaussian wave
packet is uniformaly distributed in polar coordinate by:
r = R ,
Cos = 1 - 2
= 2
13
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
14/26
Where , , are the random numbers. The coordinates of nucleons are rejected if
the distance between them is less than 1.5 fm. The local fermi momentum is determined
by relation:
=
Where U( ) is local potential. The center of each gaussian wave packet in momentum
space is uniformaly distributed in polar coordinates by:
= ( ,
Cos = 1 - 2 ,
= 2
We reject those distributions where two particles are closer than some distance .
In other words , we demand
Typically 1 out of 50,000 initializations is accepted under typically 1 out of 50,000
initializations is accepted under present criteria. The initial phase space distribution for
the colliding nuclei on QMD agrees fairly well with the experiments.
Propagation
The successfully initialized nuclei are then boosted towards each other with proper
center of mass velocity using relativistic kinematics. The center of each distribution
moves along the coulomb trajectories. This distribution is kept fixed until the distance
between surfaces of nuclei is 2 fm. The equation of motion of many body systems is,then, calculated by means of a generalized variational principle:
We start from the action
14
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
15/26
S = , *] d
With the Lagrange functional
=
The time evaluation is obtained by the requirement that the action is stationary under
the allowed variation of wave function
S = *]dt =0
The Hamiltonian H contains a kinetic term and mutual interactions . The time
evaluation of the parameters is obtained by the requirement that the action is stationary
under allowed variation of wave function. This yields an Euler Lagrange equation for
each parameter. We obtain for each parameter , an Euler- Lagrange equation :
- = 0
If the true solution of the Schrdinger equation is contained in the restricted set of
wave function (r, (t), (t)), this variation of action gives the exact solution of the
schrodinger equation. If the parameter space is too restricted, we obtain the wavefunction in the restricted parameter space which comes closest to the solution of
Schrdinger equation. Note that the set of wave functions which can be covered with
special parameterizations is not necessarily a subspace of Hilbert space, thus the
superposition principal does not hold.
For the coherent states and a Hamiltonian of the form H = -
( = kinetic energy, = potential energy), the lagrangian and the variation caneasily be calculated and we obtain:
= - > - ,
= + > = ,
15
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
16/26
= - > = - ,
With = + t and = < *|V ( )| > .
These equations represent time evolution and can be solved numerically. Thus thevariational principle reduces the time evolution of the N- body Schrodinger equation to
time evolution equations 6. ( + ). The equations of motion now show a similar
structure like classical Hamiltonian equations.
= - ; = .
The numerical solution can be achieved in the spirit of the classical molecular dynamics.
[27,28,29]The wave functions (other than the Gaussians ..) Yields more complex
equation of motion for other parameters and hence the analogy to classical molecular
dynamics is lost. The total energy of particle is the sum of kinetic and potential
energies:
= + = + + ,
Where refers to the kinetic energy of particle and and are the two andthree body interactions.
The total momentum in QMD is conserved because the Hamiltonian is well defined for
the whole system. Apart from local Skyrme interaction , a finite range Yukawa term
and an effective coulomb interaction are also included to account for various
effects. The final potential reads as:
= + + ,
The Yukawa term has been added to improve the surface properties of interaction. In
nuclear matters where the density is constant, the interaction density coincides with
16
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
17/26
single particle density and as well as are directly proportional to . The three
body part of interaction is proportional to (
In nuclear matter, the local potential energy has the form
= ( ) +
Here , are the free parameters.
In order to investigate the influence of different compressibilities one can generate the
above potential energy.
= ( ) + Depending on the values these parameters, one can have the
soft(S) and hard (H) equations of state .
Fig 3 equation of state . the density dependence of the energy per particle in nuclear
matter at temperature T=0 is displayed for four different sets of parameters.[25]
17
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
18/26
The resulting compressional energy is shown in figure for the soft (S) and hard (H)
equation of state and for the soft and hard EOS with MDI, (SM,HM). Note that all
equations of state give the same ground state binding (E/A=-16MeV at ) ,but
they differ drastically for higher densities . Here the hard EOS leads to much more
compression energy than the soft EOS at the same density the inclusion of momentum
dependent interaction leads for infinite nuclear matter at rest to almost no difference
between the cases S,SM and H,HM, respectively. This changes drastically if one
consider the heavy ion collisions the additional repulsion due to separation of projectile
and target in momentum space shifts the curve for the SM, (HM) interactions to higher
energies.
Fig 4
18
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
19/26
Fig 5
Fig. 4, 5 Time evolution of the paricle distribution in configuration space for the
reaction Au (150 MeV/A) +Au for the impact parameter of b= 3fm. The projection of all
particles in the reaction plane (x-z) is displayed for four different times as indicated.
The time-reversal symmetry of the MD calculations shows that system follows an
isentropic path. It is tempting to use the concept of the back propagation in order to
time-revert the expansion of a simulated heavy ion collision, which is assumed to
conserve the entropy. A typical evolution of a single event is shown in Fig. 4.the QMD-
MD simulation no longer leads back to two wellseparated nuclei. All particles seem to
stem from a single compact source. In momentum-space, however, the nonisotropicemission pattern is present, even after the back propagation is completed. The future
evolution of a classical dynamical system in general is strongly dependent on the
distribution of matter in phase-space. In particular the initial correlation between
configuration and momentum space determines the dynamics. In order to study the
19
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
20/26
physics of the expansion phase in more detail, we have calculated the time-evolution of
the one-body distribution function in QMD. Technically this is achieved by superposition
of many events with the same incident energy and impact parameter. The result of this
procedure is equivalent to a test particle distribution of a VUU/BUU calculation. It allows
for determination of the local velocity distribution with arbitrary precision, which is only
limited by the number of events. The first and the second moment of the local velocity
distribution are related to collective motion and the local temperature respectively.
Advantages
One would like to have the methods where correlations and fluctuations among
the nucleons can be preserved.
The classical molecular dynamics (MD)[61,62] approach ,in principle , is capable
of treating both the compression and fragment formation .
The molecular dynamics predicts the collective flow in a quantitative agreement
with the data.
It incorporates the complete N-Body dynamics which is necessary to describe
the formation of fragments . Naturally the simple classical molecular dynamics
needs more refinements which should also include the quantum features. The
quantum features play very important role at low energies..This approach was
latter extended to incorporate the quantum features was dubbed as quantum
molecular dynamics (QMD).[30,31,32,33,34,35,36,,37,38,39,40,41].Model.
In past decade several refinements and improvements were made over the original
QMD. These new versions were named as IQMD (isospin QMD)[39,42], GQMD(G-
matrix-QMD)[41,45,46,47] etc
2.5 Isospin Quantum Molecular Dynamics Model (IQMD)
20
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
21/26
Quantum molecular dynamics (QMD) model contains two dynamical ingredients, the
density dependent mean field and the in-medium nucleon-nucleon cross-section. In
order to describe the isospin dependence appropriately, the QMD model should be
modified properly. Considering the isospin effects in mean field, two-body collision and
Pauli blocking, important modifications in QMD have been made to obtain an isospin
dependent quantum molecular dynamics (IQMD). The Isospin-QMD (IQMD) treats the
different charge states of nucleons, e.g deltas and pions explicitly, as inherited from the
VUU model. IQMD has been used for the analysis of collective flow effects of nucleons
and pions. As it has been developed from the VUU-model, its coding is therefore
independent of the original QMD. The isospin degrees of freedom enter into the cross
sections (here cross sections of VUU similar to the parameterizations of VerWest and
Arndt have been taken, see also) as well as in the Coulomb interactions. The elasticand inelastic cross sections for proton-proton and proton-neutron collisions used in
IQMD are shown in Fig. 2.1. The cross section for neutron-neutron collisions is
assumed to be equal to the proton-proton cross sections[44]
21
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
22/26
Fig 6
Elastic and inelastic cross sections for proton-proton (pp) and proton neutron (pn)used in IQMD
Summery
22
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
23/26
There are many statistical as well as dynamical models to study heavy ion collisions
such as TDHF theory which is applicable at low energy, in this model only mean field is
taken into account. But no nucleon nucleon collisions are involved here.INC model is
applicable at high energy. Here mean field is totally negligible, only cascade picture
comes to play role here. Whereas BUU and QMD models play role quite effectively at
intermediate energies where both mean field as well nucleon 2 collisions are treated
on equal footing. So there models are much more useful to study the dynamics of heavy
ion reactions at intermediate energy.
REFFERENCES
[1] J.J Molitoris, H. Stocker and B.L. Winer,phys. Rev.C 36,220(1987)
[2] G.F.Bertsch,H .Kruse and S.Das Gupta,Phys.rev.C 29,673(1984)
[3] Ch.Gregoire ,B.Remoud,F.Sebille,L.Vienet and Y. Raffray, Nucl.Phys A 465,317
(1987)
[4] C.Gale, G.M. Welke, M. Prakash, S.J.Lee and S.Das Gupta, Phys.Rev.C
41, 1545(1990)
[5] W.Cassing, W.Metag, U.Mosel and K.Nitta, Phys.Rep.188,363(1990)
[6] E.A.Uehling and G.E.Uhlenbeck, Phys.Rev.43, 552(1933)
[7] J. Aichelin, C.Hartnack, A.Bohnet, L.Zhuxia , G. Peilert ,H.Stocker and W.
Greiner,Phys.Lett.B 224,34 (1989)
[8] W .Bauer, G.F .Bertsch , W .Cassing and U.Mosel, Phys. Rev. C 34,2127(1986)
[9] W. Bauer Phys.Rev.Lett.61,2534(1988);ibid Nucl.Phys.A 471,604 (1987)
23
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
24/26
[10] S .Ayik and Ch. Gregoire, Nucl.Phys.A 513,187(1990)
[11] J .R andrup and B.Remaud Nucl.Phys.A 514,339(1990)
[12] S.Ayik,Phys.Lett.B 265,47(1991)
[13] P. G. Reinhard and E.Suraud.Ann. of Phys.216,98(1992)
[14] N. N. Bogolyubov, J. Phys. (U RSS) 10 (1946) 256
[15] J. G.Kirwood, J. Chem. Phys. 14 (1946) 180[16] D. Lacroix, S. Ayik and Ph. Chomaz, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 52 (2004) 497
[17] E.Suraemin,ud,Ch.Gregoire andB.Tamian,Prog.Part.Nucl.Phys.23,357(1989)
[18] K. Washiyama and D. Lacroix, Phys. Rev. C 78, 024610(2008).
[19] Ch. O. Bacri et al., Int. Workshop on multiparticle correlations and nuclear
reactions, Nantes , France , p.338(1994).
[20] j.Aichelin et al. private communication.
[21] D.R Bowman et al., Nucl. Physics. A 523, 386(1991).
[22] K.Hagel et al., Phys.Rev. Lett. 68, 2141(1992)
[23] L. Phair et al., Phys. Lett . B 285, 10(1992)
[24] M .B Tsang et al. Phys. Rev. Lett.71,1502(1993)
[25] R.T. de Souza et al., Phys. Lett B 268, 6(1991)
[26] T. Li et al., Phys.Rev. L ETT.69, 889(1992)
[27] Molitoris.J.B.Hoffer,H.Kruse and H.STOCKER,Phys.Rev.Lett.53,899(1984)
[28] L .Wilets,Yariv and R.Chestnur,Nucl.Phys.A301, 359(1978)
[29] S.M .Kiselew and Y .E.Polrowskil,Sov.Journ,Nucl.Phys. 38,46(1983
[30] E. Suraud, Ch. Gregorie and B. Tamain , Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 23,357(1987)
[31] Li zhuxia,Z.Yizhong,Gu Yizhong,.s. Ziqiang,M.Sano, Nucl.Phys.A559,603(1993)
[32] M .Belkacem et al.,Phys.Rev.C 58,1727(1998)
[33] A. Dumitru,M.Blaicher, S.A. Bass, C.Spieles, L.Neise,H.Stocker and W.Greiner,
24
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
25/26
Phys. Rev. C 57, 3271(1998).
[34] S.A.Bas et al.,Prog.Part.Phys.(to the published),nucl-th/9803035
[35] M. Blaicher et al.,Structure of Vaccume and Elementary Matter, in proc. Of Int.
Conf. on Nuclear Phycics at the turn of Millenium , Wilderness/George, South
Africa, (1997),p.452:S.Bass et al.,ibid, p399.
[36] R.K.Puri,E.Lehmann,A.Faessler and S.W.Huang,Z.Phys.A 351,59(1995)
[37] G..Peilert J.Radrup,H.Stocker and W.Greiner, Phys.Lett.B260,271(1991)
[38] G Peilert , J. Konopka , H. Stocker, W. Greiner , M. Blann and M.G. Mustafa,
Phys. Rev. C46,1457 (1992)
[39] C.O.Duarte and J.Randrup, Phys. Lett.B 188,287(1987);C.Dorso and J.Randrup,
Phys .Lett. B 215,611(1988)Phys.Lett. B 232,29(1989)
[40] P.B.Gossiaux and J.Aichelin, Phys. Rev.C57,2109(1997)
[41] R.K. Puri and S.Kumar, Phys. Rev.C57,.2274(1998)
[42] S.Kumar and R.K.Puri, Phys. Rev. C 58, 320(1998)
[43] S.Kumar and R.K.Puri, Phys. Rev. C 58,2858(1998)
[44] S.Leray,C. Ngo,S. Leray and M.E. Spina., Nucl.Phys. A 499,148(1989)
[45] S.Leray,C.Ngo, M.Spina,B.Remaud and F.Sebille, Nucl.PhyS.a511,414(1990)
[46] S.Leray,C.Ngo,P.Bouissou,B.Remoud and F.Sebille, Nucl.Phys.A 53,177(1991)
[47] Ch. Hatrtnack, Rajeev K. Puri, J. Alchelin..Eur Phys. J. A 1 151- 35
[48] Molitoris.J.B.Hoffer,H.Kruse and H.STOCKER,Phys.Rev.Lett.53,899(1984)
[49] L .Wilets,Yariv and R.Chestnur,Nucl.Phys.A301, 359(1978)
[50] S.M .Kiselew and Y .E.Polrowskil,Sov.Journ,Nucl.Phys. 38,46(1983)
25
8/14/2019 Dolly Seminar
26/26