DONOR CHARTS - OECD · Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment DONOR CHARTS March 2016 Statistics based on DAC Members’ reporting on the Gender Equality

Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment

DONOR CHARTS

March 2016

Statistics based on DAC Members’ reporting on the Gender Equality Policy Marker, 2013-2014

Creditor Reporting System database

DEFINITION

THE GENDER EQUALITY POLICY MARKER

DEFINITION

An activity should be classified as gender equality focused (score Principal or Significant) if:

It is intended to advance gender equality and women’s empowerment or reduce discrimination and inequalities based on sex.

CRITERIA FOR ELIGIBILITY Gender equality is explicitly promoted in activity documentation through specific measures which:

a) Reduce social, economic or political power inequalities between women and men, girls and boys, ensure that women benefit equally with men from the activity, or compensate for past discrimination; or

b) Develop or strengthen gender equality or anti-discrimination policies, legislation or institutions.

This approach requires analysing gender inequalities either separately or as an integral part of agencies’ standard procedures.

EXAMPLES OF TYPICAL ACTIVITIES

Examples of activities that could be marked as principal objective:

-- legal literacy for women and girls; -- male networks against gender violence; -- a social safety net project which focuses specifically on assisting women and girls as a particularly disadvantaged group in a society; -- capacity building of Ministries of Finance and Planning to incorporate gender equality objectives in national poverty reduction or comparable strategies.

Such activities can target women specifically, men specifically or both women and men. Examples of activities that could be marked as significant

objective:

-- activity which has as its principal objective to provide drinking water to a district or community while at the same time ensuring that women and girls have safe and easy access to the facilities; -- a social safety net project which focuses on the community as a whole and ensures that women and girls benefit equally with men and boys.

N.B. Support to women’s equality organisations and institutions (CRS sector code 15170) scores, by definition, principal objective.

OVERVIEW

Gender Equality Focus of DAC Members’ Aid by Sector Average annual value of commitments in 2013-2014

constant 2013 USD 33.9 billion

Coverage – All DAC members report on the gender equality focus of their aid. As from 2010 data, the

calculation of allocable aid is no longer based on sectors but on types of aid. This new methodology slightly extends the scope of aid screened, mainly with the inclusion of humanitarian aid. The calculation includes the following types of aid: sector budget support, core support to NGOs, support to specific funds managed by international organisations, pooled funding, projects, donor country personnel and other technical assistance, and scholarships in donor country. The term bilateral allocable aid in this publication refers to this new methodology.

This chart is based on commitment data, which best reflect current policies by donors. A two-year average is given, as the focus and volume of commitments vary from year to year. DAC members use a ‘marker’ to identify activities that have gender equality as a principal or significant objective. Reporting has strongly improved over the years, and although some members encounter difficulties in applying the methodology, the currently available data nevertheless give a reliable indication of the extent to which those donors that report address gender equality in their aid programmes.

10%

9%

11%

5%

19%3%2%

2%3%

3%

8%

2%

3%

9%

10%

Education

Health

Population Pol./Progr. & Reproductive Health

Water Supply & Sanitation

Government & Civil Society

Other Social Infrastructure & Services

Other Economic Infrastrustures & Services

Energy

Banking & Financial Services

Business & Other Services

Agriculture & Rural Development

Other Multisector

General Environment Protection

Industry, Mining,Construction, Trade &

Tourim

USD 33.9 bn

Humanitarian Aid

AID AT A GLANCE - DONORS' CHARTS

The following charts (2013-2014) summarise statistics on aid focused on gender equality and women’s empowerment extended by each DAC member. Information shown includes the gender equality policy marker coverage, the top ten recipients and a sector breakdown of aid focused on gender equality and women’s empowerment.

Guidance for the interpretation of the charts: The first element to take into account when analysing the data for one country or when comparing data between countries is the COVERAGE RATIO, i.e. the proportion of aid which is screened. A high percentage of gender equality focused aid ALONE does not mean that aid is well aligned with the gender equality policy objective, such a conclusion would only be valid for a donor with 100% coverage. When comparing data between donors, both coverage ratio and % of aid focused on gender equality and women’s empowerment have to be considered. (A number of members do not screen contributions that are by nature likely to fall under the “not targeted” category, e.g. imputed student costs. Therefore, a high amount in the category “not screened” generally increases the percentage of gender equality focused aid significantly.)

Aid in support of Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment,

2013-2014 average (2013 USD million)

Note: An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and fundamental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was screened for promoting gender equality, but was found to not be targeted to it.

Principal Significant

Sub-Total:

Gender

Equality

focused

as % of aid

screenedNot targeted

Total:

aid screenedNot screened

Bilateral

allocable, total

a b c = a + b c / e d e = c + d f included in (a)

Australia 181 1,553 1,734 56 1,356 3,090 415 3,505 43

Austria 11 84 95 27 261 357 1 358 4

Belgium 100 646 746 72 288 1,034 51 1,085 5

Canada 717 1,104 1,821 61 1,144 2,964 0 2,964 3

Czech Republic 1 8 9 23 29 38 7 44 0

Denmark 61 837 898 50 895 1,792 119 1,912 2

EU Institutions 178 3,971 4,148 25 12,278 16,427 3,446 19,872 22

Finland 40 262 303 43 408 711 0 711 12

France 42 739 781 17 3,917 4,697 1,762 6,459 3

Germany 225 5,124 5,349 40 7,990 13,339 411 13,750 30

Greece 0 4 5 78 1 6 1 7 0

Iceland 2 18 21 82 5 25 0 25 2

Ireland 18 199 218 46 254 472 2 474 10

Italy 30 189 219 65 119 338 209 546 9

Japan 253 2,604 2,856 20 11,547 14,404 1,866 16,269 5

Korea 60 194 255 12 1,927 2,182 0 2,182 9

Luxembourg 11 60 70 25 206 276 0 276 0

Netherlands 281 899 1,179 43 1,545 2,724 0 2,724 31

New Zealand 9 179 188 49 193 381 0 381 0

Norway 349 962 1,311 33 2,626 3,936 0 3,936 93

Poland 1 1 2 1 162 164 4 167 0

Portugal 1 37 38 14 229 267 0 267 0

Slovak Republic 0 1 1 5 11 12 0 12 0

Slovenia 0 1 1 10 10 12 0 12 0

Spain 121 226 347 57 258 605 0 605 27

Sweden 425 1,954 2,379 83 491 2,871 48 2,919 52

Switzerland 46 363 409 15 2,329 2,738 0 2,738 1

United Kingdom 1,154 1,982 3,136 59 2,213 5,349 1,409 6,758 31

United States 1,511 3,889 5,400 22 19,622 25,023 0 25,023 8

Total DAC members 5,828 28,089 33,916 32 72,315 106,232 9,750 115,982 404

Support to

women's

equality

organisations

and institutions

Australia

2013 2014

Principal objective 193 168

Significant objective 1,554 1,552

Not targeted 1,394 1,319

Not screened 404 427

Total bilateral allocable aid 3,545 3,466

Gender equality focused aid (3) 56% 57%

Memo:

Total non bilateral allocable aid 605 278

Aid to Women's equality organisations

(included in principal) 33 53

Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0 9

(*) break in bilateral allocable calculation method in 2010

Indonesia 514 514 65%

Papua New Guinea 461 461 62%

Solomon Islands 174 173 64%

Philippines 142 142 44%

Viet Nam 141 141 51%

Afghanistan 132 132 40%

Timor-Leste 102 102 65%

Bangladesh 92 92 86%

Myanmar 83 83 40%

Cambodia 78 78 48%





Viet Nam 141 66 51%



Pakistan 71 49 72%


Vanuatu 56 40 73%

Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women's Empowerment2013-2014

(1)

Investment in gender equality and women’s empowerment is vital for improving economic, social and political conditions in developing countries within the framework

of sustainable development. A focus on gender equality and women’s empowerment in development co-operation is a means for enhancing the total effectiveness of

aid (2).

An activity can target gender equality as a "principal objective" or "significant objective". Principal means gender equality was an explicit objective of the activity and

fundemental in its design. Significant means gender equality was an important, but secondary, objective of the activity. Not targeted means that the activity was

screened for promoting gender equality, but was not found to have targeted it.

Not all activities have been screened against the gender marker: the coverage ratio for bilateral allocable activities is 88%.

Gender equality focus of donor's aid programme2013 USD million

(1) Amounts are average commitments for 2013-2014, unless otherwise shown

Sector breakdown Top ten recipients

Percentage of gender equality focused aid by sector Gender equality focus in aid to

top ten recipients 2013 USD million

Total aid Total bilateral

allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)

Top ten recipients of gender equality

focused aid

Gender equality focus of sectors

2013 USD million2013 USD million

Total bilateral

allocable aid

Gender equality focused aid

(3)

(2) DAC Guidelines for Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in Development Co-operation, 1999

(3) % of bilateral allocable aid excluding activities not screened against the gender equality marker.

Note: Statistics on gender focus exclude bilateral non-allocable aid since several members do not apply the gender marker on these forms of aid. This category

includes programme assistance (e.g. general budget support...), debt relief and in-donor expenses.

Source: (Creditor Reporting System) CRS Aid Activity database at www.oecd.org/dac/stats/gender

020406080

100

Economicinfrastructure

Education

Government and civilsociety

Health

MultisectorOther social

infrastructure

Population andreproductive health

Production

Water and sanitation

0

200

400

600

800

1000

Education Health andPopulation

Other SocialInfrast., incl.

Women'sequality

EconomicInfrastructure

Production Multisector

Gender equality focused aid Not targeted Not screened

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 * 11 12 13 2014

Significant Principal Gender Eq. focused, %

2013 USD million % of bilateral allocable

Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Austria

2013 2014


Significant objective 89 79

Not targeted 312 211

Not screened 2 0

Total bilateral allocable aid 416 299


Memo:



(included in principal) 7 0.8

Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0.4 0.3


Myanmar 70 0 19%

Turkey 32 7 0%

Bosnia and Herzegovina 28 13 4%

China (People's Republic of) 17 13 0%

Albania 17 15 3%

Kosovo 14 10 30%

Ethiopia 13 12 79%

Uganda 13 12 87%

Serbia 11 2 17%

Viet Nam 10 9 0%

Uganda 12 11 87%

Ethiopia 12 10 79%

Burkina Faso 6 5 84%

Moldova 7 4 56%

Mozambique 7 4 50%

West Bank and Gaza Strip 7 4 51%

Kosovo 10 3 30%

Armenia 6 2 41%

Georgia 4 2 54%

Nepal 4 2 39%


(1)

Investment in gender equality and women’s empowerment is vital for improving economic, social and political conditions in developing countries within the

framework of sustainable development. A focus on gender equality and women’s empowerment in development co-operation is a means for enhancing the total

effectiveness of aid (2).




All activities have been screened against the gender marker: the gender coverage ratio is thus 100%.







allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

20

40

60

80

100



Women'sequality




0%

6%

12%

18%

24%

30%

0

20

40

60

80

100

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 * 11 12 13 2014


2013 USD million % of bilateral allocableRight hand scale

Left hand scale

Belgium

2013 2014




Not screened 75 26



Memo:






Democratic Republic of the Congo 164 163 81%

Burundi 69 68 82%

Rwanda 59 58 80%

Viet Nam 39 39 90%


Tanzania 27 26 85%

Benin 26 26 90%

Niger 26 25 97%

Mozambique 26 26 84%

South Africa 24 23 50%


Burundi 68 55 82%

Rwanda 58 46 80%

Viet Nam 39 33 90%


Niger 25 23 97%

Benin 26 23 90%


Tanzania 26 21 85%

Uganda 20 19 96%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

50

100

150

200



Women'sequality




30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

0

200

400

600

800

1000

2007 08 09 10 * 11 12 13 2014



Right hand scaleLeft hand scale

Canada

2013 2014


Significant objective 953 1,255


Not screened 0 0



Memo:






Ukraine 172 172 31%


Mali 148 148 92%

Ethiopia 136 136 81%


Senegal 102 93 12%

South Sudan 92 92 79%

Jordan 92 92 61%

Syrian Arab Republic 84 84 42%

Haiti 75 75 71%

Mali 148 136 92%





Jordan 92 56 61%

Ukraine 172 54 31%

Haiti 75 54 71%

Colombia 66 52 78%

Ghana 45 44 97%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

100

200

300

400

500

600



Women'sequality




0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 * 11 12 13 2014



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Czech Republic

2013 2014



Not targeted 21 37

Not screened 12 1



Memo:



(included in principal) 0 0.1

Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0 0.0

Ukraine 5.7 2.1 8%

Afghanistan 4.9 4.8 8%

Moldova 4.7 4.6 21%

Ethiopia 3.7 3.7 60%

Bosnia and Herzegovina 3.7 3.7 18%

Mongolia 3.3 3.2 13%

Georgia 3.0 2.7 23%

Kosovo 1.8 1.6 34%

Syrian Arab Republic 1.7 0.7 25%

Serbia 1.7 1.6 4%

Ethiopia 3.7 2.1 60%

Moldova 4.6 0.9 21%


Georgia 2.7 0.5 23%

Kosovo 1.6 0.5 34%

Cambodia 1.2 0.5 42%

Mongolia 3.2 0.4 13%


Zambia 0.7 0.2 32%

Iraq 0.3 0.2 88%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

3

6

9

12

15



Women'sequality




0%

6%

12%

18%

24%

30%

0

2

4

6

8

10

2012 2013 2014



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Denmark

2013 2014



Not targeted 1,083 707

Not screened 66 172



Memo:






Tanzania 204 165 62%


Uganda 93 93 94%

Mali 66 66 53%

Bolivia 63 63 99%

Nepal 56 56 91%



Ghana 49 49 92%



Uganda 93 87 94%


Bolivia 63 60 99%

Nepal 56 51 91%

Ghana 49 44 92%

Mali 66 33 53%



Pakistan 19 18 94%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

100

200

300

400

500

600



Women'sequality




10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 * 11 12 13 2014



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

EU Institutions

2013 2014




Not screened 6,891 0



Memo:

Total non bilateral allocable aid 1,999 1,526





Turkey 3,661 3,661 26%

Ukraine 716 527 1%

Serbia 698 698 0%

Morocco 696 631 52%

Tunisia 651 512 6%


Bosnia and Herzegovina 446 446 0%



Mali 333 184 24%

Turkey 3,661 570 26%


Morocco 631 247 52%



South Africa 268 103 38%

Pakistan 189 100 53%


Viet Nam 239 85 61%

Jordan 231 81 35%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

2000

4000

6000

8000



Women'sequality




0%

7%

14%

21%

28%

35%

42%

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 * 11 12 13 2014



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Finland

2013 2014




Not screened 0 0



Memo:






Kenya 47 45 30%


Nepal 36 34 75%

Ethiopia 27 24 68%


Somalia 24 24 64%

Zambia 21 19 40%

Viet Nam 19 18 3%


Tanzania 15 13 43%


Nepal 34 26 75%

Ethiopia 24 16 68%

Somalia 24 15 64%

Kenya 45 13 30%



Myanmar 10 8 79%

Zambia 19 8 40%

Lebanon 7 6 85%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

50

100

150

200



Women'sequality




10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

0

100

200

300

400

500

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 * 11 12 13 2014



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

France

2013 2014




Not screened 2,923 600



Memo:






Morocco 568 453 27%


Côte d'Ivoire 302 286 3%

Myanmar 299 6 29%

India 298 287 1%

Senegal 292 209 24%

Tunisia 292 238 13%

Cameroon 259 233 6%

Colombia 257 241 2%

Brazil 254 225 2%

Dominican Republic 119 107 93%

Morocco 453 69 27%

Senegal 209 42 24%



Tanzania 59 30 53%

Guinea 61 29 63%

Tunisia 238 28 13%

Niger 82 18 34%

Algeria 32 18 93%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

500

1000

1500

2000



Women'sequality




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

2008 09 10 * 11 12 13 2014



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Germany

2013 2014







Memo:






India 1,214 1,136 6%


Morocco 778 752 2%


Turkey 443 396 1%

Viet Nam 360 340 20%

Brazil 303 279 15%



Egypt 269 218 29%


Mexico 232 102 44%


Tunisia 174 96 55%

Colombia 160 90 56%


Yemen 90 78 87%

Ethiopia 93 75 82%

Chile 198 74 38%

Kenya 148 73 50%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000



Women'sequality




10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

2002 04 06 08 10 * 12 2014



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Greece

2013 2014

Principal objective 0.0 0.1

Significant objective 3.8 5.2

Not targeted 0.9 1.7

Not screened 1.1 1.4

Total bilateral allocable aid 5.7 8.3


Memo:

Total non bilateral allocable aid 37.9 38.8


(included in principal) 0.0 0.1



Ukraine 2.3 0.3 100%

Albania 2.1 1.0 99%

West Bank and Gaza Strip 1.2 0.4 15%


Democratic Republic of the Congo 0.7 0.1 100%

Egypt 0.7 0.5 100%

Iran 0.6 0.1 100%

Moldova 0.5 0.1 99%

Turkey 0.5 0.3 99%

Belarus 0.4 0.0 100%

Albania 1.0 0.9 99%

Egypt 0.5 0.5 100%

Ukraine 0.3 0.3 100%

Turkey 0.3 0.2 99%

Jordan 0.2 0.2 100%

Tunisia 0.1 0.1 100%

Serbia 0.3 0.1 48%

Argentina 0.1 0.1 100%

Armenia 0.1 0.1 100%

Democratic Republic of the Congo 0.1 0.1 100%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0



Women'sequality




0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

0

25

50

75

100

125

2002 04 06 08 10 * 12 2014



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Iceland

2013 2014



Not targeted 4 5

Not screened 0 0



Memo:





Malawi 5.3 5.3 100%

Uganda 3.7 3.7 100%

Mozambique 2.7 2.7 100%




Ethiopia 0.3 0.3 100%

Philippines 0.2 0.2 100%

Belarus 0.2 0.2 100%

Somalia 0.1 0.1 100%

Malawi 5.3 5.3 100%

Uganda 3.7 3.7 100%

Mozambique 2.7 2.7 100%




Ethiopia 0.3 0.3 100%

Philippines 0.2 0.2 100%

Belarus 0.2 0.2 100%

Somalia 0.1 0.1 100%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

2

4

6

8



Women'sequality




40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

0

5

10

15

20

25

2011 12 13 2014



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Ireland

2013 2014




Not screened 0 5



Memo:







Ethiopia 47 45 69%

Tanzania 38 31 70%

Uganda 34 32 62%

Malawi 26 25 51%

Zambia 25 23 73%

Viet Nam 17 15 38%

Sierra Leone 14 13 50%



Ethiopia 45 31 69%


Tanzania 31 22 70%

Uganda 32 20 62%

Zambia 23 17 73%

Malawi 25 13 51%

Liberia 9 7 72%


Viet Nam 15 6 38%

Zimbabwe 9 6 64%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

20

40

60

80

100

120



Women'sequality




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

2007 08 09 10 * 11 12 13 2014



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Italy

2013 2014







Memo:







Ethiopia 27 26 96%


Albania 22 22 70%



Lebanon 17 17 42%

Niger 15 15 98%

India 12 12 79%

Viet Nam 12 12 91%


Ethiopia 26 20 96%

Niger 15 15 98%

Albania 22 14 70%


Viet Nam 12 9 91%

Mozambique 15 8 80%

Senegal 7 6 90%

Somalia 8 5 90%

South Sudan 8 5 96%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

25

50

75

100

125



Women'sequality




0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

0

70

140

210

280

2008 09 10 * 11 12 13 2014



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Japan

2013 2014




Not screened 2,326 1,405



Memo:



(included in principal) 1.5 8

Contribution to UN Women (multilateral) 0.2 5


India 3,126 3,126 28%

Myanmar 2,944 952 1%

Viet Nam 1,873 1,721 0%

Bangladesh 1,533 1,533 30%




Uzbekistan 553 553 0%

Sri Lanka 509 509 6%

Tunisia 315 315 1%

India 3,126 866 28%

Bangladesh 1,533 449 30%



Nepal 118 80 82%

Cabo Verde 79 78 100%

Tanzania 162 63 42%


Morocco 115 47 43%

Somalia 47 42 96%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

2000

4000

6000

8000



Women'sequality




0%

6%

12%

18%

24%

0

800

1600

2400

3200

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 * 11 12 13 2014



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Korea

2013 2014




Not screened 0 0



Memo:






Viet Nam 243 242 15%

Myanmar 208 208 13%

Cambodia 149 149 9%




Ethiopia 87 87 18%

Mozambique 86 86 0%

Uzbekistan 80 80 0%

Sri Lanka 79 79 1%

Viet Nam 242 37 15%

Myanmar 208 26 13%

Lao People's Democratic Republic 56 17 31%

Ethiopia 87 15 18%

Cambodia 149 13 9%

Rwanda 57 12 22%

Bolivia 20 12 62%


Iraq 21 10 49%

Nepal 20 10 48%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700



Women'sequality




0%

5%

10%

15%

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

2007 08 09 10 * 11 12 13 2014



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Luxembourg

2013 2014




Not screened 0 0



Memo:







Senegal 18 16 41%

Mali 18 17 27%


Niger 18 16 70%

Cabo Verde 17 15 5%

Nicaragua 14 12 61%

Viet Nam 12 11 10%

El Salvador 9 9 53%

Kosovo 9 8 0%


Niger 16 11 70%

Nicaragua 12 7 61%

Senegal 16 7 41%


El Salvador 9 5 53%

Mali 17 5 27%

Viet Nam 11 1 10%


Peru 1 1 70%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

10

20

30

40

50



Women'sequality




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2008 09 10 * 11 12 13 2014



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Netherlands

2013 2014


Significant objective 516 1,282


Not screened 0 0



Memo:

Total non bilateral allocable aid 640 1,158







Mali 76 76 81%


Rwanda 73 73 5%

Ghana 61 61 70%


Burundi 51 51 24%


Ethiopia 32 32 46%


Mali 76 62 81%

Ghana 61 43 70%


Benin 31 27 87%

Yemen 29 26 89%


Ethiopia 32 15 46%


Burundi 51 12 24%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

200

400

600

800



Women'sequality




0%

15%

30%

45%

60%

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 * 11 12 13 2014



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

New Zealand

2013 2014




Not screened 0 0



Memo:



(included in principal) 0.4 0





Tonga 30 30 33%

Cook Islands 24 24 6%

Samoa 23 23 38%

Vanuatu 20 20 72%

Tokelau 18 9 10%

Tuvalu 17 17 5%


Indonesia 15 15 8%




Vanuatu 20 14 72%

Tonga 30 10 33%

Samoa 23 9 38%

Philippines 9 6 66%

Kiribati 13 4 31%

Nauru 4 4 100%



(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

20

40

60

80



Women'sequality




0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

0

50

100

150

200

250

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 * 11 12 13 2014



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Norway

2013 2014


Significant objective 1,080 843


Not screened 0 0



Memo:






Brazil 187 186 1%

Malawi 161 140 70%





Somalia 102 101 47%

Ethiopia 100 99 34%

Nepal 83 83 51%

Uganda 70 70 44%

Malawi 140 98 70%


Somalia 101 47 47%

Liberia 47 42 91%

Nepal 83 42 51%



Ethiopia 99 34 34%


Uganda 70 31 44%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

200

400

600

800

1000



Women'sequality




0%

15%

30%

45%

0

500

1000

1500

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 * 11 12 13 2014



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Poland

2013 2014



Not targeted 48 276

Not screened 7 0



Memo:





Moldova 69 68 0%

Kyrgyzstan 27 27 0%

Ethiopia 25 25 0%

Belarus 21 14 0%

Ukraine 19 9 1%

Georgia 3 3 8%

Afghanistan 2 2 6%


Kazakhstan 1 1 0%

Kosovo 1 1 0%


Tanzania 0.4 0.2 61%

Georgia 2.9 0.2 8%

Mali 0.2 0.2 99%


Tajikistan 0.5 0.1 25%


Burundi 0.1 0.1 48%

South Sudan 0.3 0.1 23%

Ukraine 9.5 0.1 1%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

20

40

60

80

100



Women'sequality




0%

1%

2%

3%

4%

5%

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

2013 2014



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Portugal

2013 2014




Not screened 0 0



Memo:






Cabo Verde 146 136 1%



Sao Tome and Principe 12 9 53%

Angola 12 11 33%


Guinea-Bissau 10 8 54%

Brazil 4 4 0%

South Africa 2 2 0%

Rwanda 1 1 100%



Sao Tome and Principe 9 5 53%

Guinea-Bissau 8 4 54%

Angola 11 4 33%

Cabo Verde 136 2 1%

Rwanda 0.5 0.5 100%

Kosovo 0.2 0.1 95%


Georgia 0.1 0.1 87%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

20

40

60

80



Women'sequality




0%

5%

10%

15%

0

20

40

60

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 * 11 12 13 2014



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Slovak Republic

2013 2014







Memo:

Total non bilateral allocable aid 4.2 4.0





Kenya 1.5 1.5 33%

Serbia 1.3 1.3 0%

Ukraine 1.2 1.2 0%

Moldova 0.8 0.8 0%


Kosovo 0.5 0.5 1%

Georgia 0.5 0.5 2%


Montenegro 0.3 0.3 0%

South Sudan 0.3 0.3 0%

Kenya 1.5 0.5 33%

Georgia 0.5 0.0 2%

Kosovo 0.5 0.0 1%

Albania 0.2 0.0 3%

Uganda 0.0 0.0 33%


Serbia 1.3 0.0 0%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0



Women'sequality




0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

2013 2014



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Slovenia

2013 2014







Memo:





Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 3.2 0.9 0%



Kosovo 1.3 1.3 54%

Serbia 1.1 0.8 7%

Cabo Verde 0.4 0.4 0%

Albania 0.3 0.3 0%

Moldova 0.3 0.3 0%



Kosovo 1.3 0.7 54%





Serbia 0.8 0.1 7%

Rwanda 0.1 0.0 50%

Uganda 0.04 0.04 100%

Georgia 0.00 0.00 62%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

1

2

3

4

5

6



Women'sequality




0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

2010 11 12 13 2014




Spain

2013 2014




Not screened 0 0



Memo:






Côte d'Ivoire 118 0 88%

Colombia 42 42 50%

Morocco 37 37 84%

Peru 35 35 63%

El Salvador 29 24 81%

Bolivia 23 23 90%



Nicaragua 18 18 82%

Mali 17 16 65%

Morocco 37 31 84%

Peru 35 22 63%

Bolivia 23 21 90%

Colombia 42 21 50%

El Salvador 24 20 81%

Guatemala 17 15 88%

Nicaragua 18 15 82%



Mali 16 10 65%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

50

100

150

200

250



Women'sequality




0%

15%

30%

45%

60%

75%

0

300

600

900

1200

1500

2006 07 08 09 10 * 11 12 13 2014




Sweden

2013 2014




Not screened 38 58



Memo:






Tanzania 123 58 74%



Somalia 99 99 96%

Zambia 82 82 93%

Kenya 77 77 95%



Cambodia 49 49 94%

Mali 45 45 98%


Somalia 99 92 96%

Zambia 82 76 93%

Kenya 77 73 95%



Cambodia 49 46 94%


Mali 45 44 98%

Tanzania 58 43 74%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200



Women'sequality




0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 * 11 12 13 2014



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

Switzerland

2013 2014




Not screened 0 0



Memo:






Nepal 88 87 23%

Kosovo 85 84 10%

Mali 67 66 9%

Bolivia 56 54 22%



Tajikistan 48 47 20%

Chad 45 44 32%

Albania 45 44 5%

Myanmar 43 41 15%

Nepal 87 20 23%

Viet Nam 28 17 59%

Mongolia 34 14 42%

Chad 44 14 32%


Bolivia 54 12 22%


Tunisia 27 9 35%

Tajikistan 47 9 20%

Kosovo 84 8 10%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

200

400

600

800



Women'sequality




0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

0

100

200

300

400

500

2007 08 09 10 * 11 12 13 2014



Right hand scale Left hand scale

United Kingdom

2013 2014

Principal objective 420 1,887



Not screened 1,521 1,297



Memo:






Kenya 1,056 1,054 98%

India 323 316 95%







Nigeria 119 114 83%

Uganda 117 116 80%

Kenya 1,054 1,007 98%


India 316 163 95%



Nigeria 114 77 83%



Malawi 106 68 74%

Uganda 116 67 80%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

500

1000

1500

2000



Women'sequality




5%

20%

35%

50%

65%

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

2002 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 * 11 12 13 2014



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

United States

2013 2014

Principal objective 1,193 1,830



Not screened 0 0



Memo:





Afghanistan 2,278 2,278 35%

Jordan 954 766 10%



Kenya 813 813 23%




Nigeria 524 524 27%


Afghanistan 2,278 799 35%



Kenya 813 191 23%


Nigeria 524 141 27%

Colombia 393 122 31%



Liberia 353 110 31%


(1)














allocable aid

Gender

equality

focused aid (3)


focused aid



Total bilateral

allocable aid


(3)






020406080

100


Education


Health


infrastructure


Production


0

2000

4000

6000

8000



Women'sequality




0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

2011 12 13 2014



Right hand scale

Left hand scale

OECD-DAC Secretariat www.oecd.org/dac/stats/gender

Documents

DONOR CHARTS - OECD · Aid in Support of Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment DONOR CHARTS March 2016 Statistics based on DAC Members’ reporting on the Gender Equality