Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
RIZZO REFORM PROGRAM
2013 – 2017
NAVAL ENGINEERING
STRATEGIC PLAN
DP
S:J
UL0
31/1
3
NAVAL ENGINEERING
STRATEGIC PLAN2013 – 2017
Table of ContentsStatement of Direction 5
Statement of Commitment 7
Statement of Intent 9
Role Statement 10
Our Mission 11
Our Primary Goal 11
Approach to Naval Engineering Strategy 13
Naval Engineering Goals and Objectives 2013 – 2017 16
Glossary of Terms 24
NAVA
L EN
GINE
ERIN
G S
TRAT
EGIC
PLA
N
3
NAVA
L EN
GINE
ERIN
G ST
RATE
GIC
PLAN
4
STATEMENT OF DIRECTIONChief of Navy
Vice Admiral Ray Griggs, AO, CSC, RAN Technology is at the very heart of our modern Navy. As we look to the future, our reliance on engineering and technology is not expected to diminish. All of our people need to understand technology’s central role, however it is state-of-the-art materiel and engineering excellence that will continue to be the keystones to providing us with confidence to “Fight and Win at Sea”.
The Navy operates ships, submarines and other operational systems with the intent to:
• maximise the likelihood of achieving and continuing to achieve the defined operational outcomes; whilst
• minimising the risk posed to personnel, public safety, and the environment.
The ability to design, construct and maintain materiel elements of capability is fundamental to achieving this desired outcome. Materiel design establishes inherent levels of operational performance, safety, reliability and environmental protection; well designed and maintained materiel together with competent personnel, delivers operational effectiveness. Any deterioration in the materiel quality through operational wear and tear is addressed through the conduct of maintenance and system grooming.
The delivery of these functions is not the sole responsibility of the technical workforce. All Navy people must understand the fundamental importance of engineering and maintenance to the safety of our people, protection of the environment and the delivery of operational effectiveness. We all have an obligation to provide and foster the climate for proper discharge of these functions and ensure that an appropriate balance of priorities is applied as we consider materiel state among the many tasks that we have to manage.
In exercising my duties as the Capability Manager, I have directed Head Navy Engineering to:
• set, policies, standards and specifications that support delivery of materiel availability, consistent with Defence materiel policies and standards;
• establish and maintain requirements for competent people, processes and organisation to deliver and maintain platform capability within that policy regime;
• establish and maintain processes for the materiel certification of platforms and equipment;
• oversee an independent audit function to ensure compliance with regulations and standards; and
• develop and promulgate guidance to ensure the wider Navy understands its role in maintaining the technical integrity of the maritime materiel capability.
MissionTo fight and win at sea
NAVA
L EN
GINE
ERIN
G S
TRAT
EGIC
PLA
N
5
I expect all commanders, and invite other managers who impact the maritime capability, to accept personal responsibility to ensure that they:
• are aware of the high priority I place on the technical integrity of maritime materiel and therefore, the criticality of maintenance;
• establish an environment for the proper discharge of duties and decision making in relation to the design, construction and maintenance of materiel. One where the operational imperative is but one of the factors that drives the final decision;
• understand the competency and qualification requirements of engineering and technical personnel that provide materiel design, construction and maintenance support; and
• undertake informed risk assessments and exercise judgement when conflicting priorities arise.
I look to all personnel to play their part in ensuring compliance with proper engineering and maintenance practice as we work together to as stewards of our equipment, our people, our reputation and our Navy.
Chief of Navy Vice Admiral Ray Griggs, AO, CSC, RAN
NAVA
L EN
GINE
ERIN
G ST
RATE
GIC
PLAN
6
STATEMENT OF COMMITMENT CEO Defence Materiel Organisation
Mr Warren KingIn his Statement of Direction, CN has stated his requirements from engineering services, to allow him to effectively discharge his duties as the Maritime Capability Manager of the Australian Defence Force. The Capability Manager’s requirements apply to the engineering effort in all organisations, which contribute to the Maritime Capability.
The DMO delivers capability and through-life sustainment of military equipment, including all Maritime Materiel. As the Maritime Capability Manager, CN is the primary consumer of the DMO’s maritime products and services. The DMO’s goal is to be a business-like, accountable and o u t c o m e - d r i v e n
organisation. Understanding our customer’s requirement is a critical input into achieving the right outcomes, by delivering products and services that match our client’s needs and expectations.
Naval engineering plays a significant role in the delivery of those products and services. And therefore, it is my commitment that the DMO will:
• align with the CN’s Statement of Direction for engineering services.
• partner with the RAN in its effort to establish a strong Naval Engineering function.
• foster the development of the wider Naval Engineering Community that cuts across Defence and Industry.
VISIONTo be recognised and respected as a global leader in defence materiel solutions.
GOALSDeliver Defence sustainment and acquisition capability to achieve our vision by:• Providingsound,timely,respectedandindependentadvice• Deliveringgovernmentapprovedsustainmentandacquisitionoutcomes• ImprovingourunderstandingofDefence’srequiredoutcomesand
providing cost-effective materiel options to meet those outcomes • Improvingthetransparencyofourbusiness• Buildingstrongerandmoretrustedpartnerships• Maintainingabalancedandflexibleorganisationwithstrong
governance to support the performance of the DMO • Buildingacapableworkforcewithastrongsafetyandperformance
culture to support our core functions • Improvingandleveragingourrelationshipswithsuppliers• Buildingstrongerlinkstocreatefuturecapabilitysolutionsand
managed technology
NAVA
L EN
GINE
ERIN
G S
TRAT
EGIC
PLA
N
7
In his Statement, CN has explained the importance of ensuring technical integrity of Maritime Materiel and expects the wider Maritime community to understand this requirement, I endorse CN’s views on this matter and support the initiative to establish, develop and embed within our people, process and organisations the awareness and appreciation of the importance of ensuring the technical integrity of Maritime Materiel.
I expect all DMO managers, engineers and technicians who contribute to the Maritime Capability to:
• ensure they understand the requirements set by the Capability Manager;
• have in place processes and procedures to comply with these requirements; and
• act under the leadership and guidance of the Head Navy Engineering to provide confidence to CN in the technical integrity of Maritime Materiel.
I look to all staff to contribute to the DMO’s vision to be a ‘recognised and respected as a global leader in defence materiel solutions’ by:
• gaining a better understanding of the role of engineering services,
• appreciating the importance of technical integrity; and
• deepening our relationship with the wider Naval Engineering community.
CEO Defence Materiel OrganisationMr Warren King
NAVA
L EN
GINE
ERIN
G ST
RATE
GIC
PLAN
8
STATEMENT OF INTENTHead of Navy Engineering
Rear Admiral Michael Uzzell, AM, RANAs HNE during this period when the reform required by the remediation of the findings of the Rizzo Review are to be developed and implemented, I am presented with a once-in-a-generation opportunity to guide the re-establishment of a robust, competent Naval Engineering Function that satisfies the Chief Of Navy’s Statement Of Direction.
In taking full advantage of this opportunity, it is my intent to:
• Develop a complete definition of the inter-related Engineering Functions that are required to generate the materiel outcomes required during each phase of the maritime capability life-cycle.
• Identify the processes (existing and new) that deliver these functions across the Defence and DMO spectrum.
• Ensure that these functions are executed within the context of the Defence Capability Lifecycle and Defence-wide engineering policies and procedures.
• Identify the technical workforce requirements, both in competency and capacity terms that enable these functions and create sustainable arrangements to continue to deliver that workforce.
• Identify the data and information requirements that enable these functions and create sustainable arrangements to continue to satisfy those data delivery demands.
• Identify the requirements of the tools that are needed to process the data, manage the information, and interact with the workforce to create the required outcomes.
• Organise the workforce to ensure that competence in specified technology domains relevant to maritime capability is developed, nurtured, and sustained,
• Identify sustainable professional awareness and development pathways for the engineering and technical workforce to ensure that the potential benefits of technology developments can be recognised, analysed, and harnessed.
Over the next 5 years, if we are to achieve what is required of us by the Rizzo Review, it is necessary for the following to be achieved:
• A continuous increase in the mastery in, and knowledge, of the technology employed in the maritime domain.
• A workforce that is organised, educated, trained, and consequently capable of sustained delivery of the engineering functions that are required to generate the materiel outcomes required during each phase of the maritime capability life-cycle.
• A clearly defined engineering management regime that allows for responsibility and accountability for the outcomes of engineering functions to be allocated as it best suits the Force Element.
• A relevant, contemporary, and suitable Seaworthiness Assurance Framework that assures the delivery of safety, environmental protection, and operational effectiveness outcomes.
It is my stated intent to deliver the best possible outcomes within the constraints of the environment in which we operate.
Head of Navy EngineeringRear Admiral Michael Uzzell, AM, RAN
NAVA
L EN
GINE
ERIN
G S
TRAT
EGIC
PLA
N
9
Role StatementThe role of Head of Navy Engineering (HNE) is to:
• Provide advice to CN regarding ADF Maritime technical matters.
• Ensure Navy strategic technical policies relating to the Seaworthiness Assurance Framework are generated within the framework of standardised Defence materiel delivery processes, to inform and guide suppliers of support to maritime capability and to provide direction for Navy technical services at the operational level.
• Provide strategic oversight, governance and performance monitoring of the delivery of technical support products and services from supplier organisations.
• Provide “one voice” for all Naval Engineering requirements and sustainment for Maritime capability.
• Act as a Head of Community and represent Navy Engineering personnel matters directly to CN.
To discharge these responsibilities, HNE is to establish functions within Navy to:
Oversee• Monitor that the naval engineering functions are delivered in line with applicable civilian and defence
legislation, processes and professional standards, by engineering personnel across Defence and Industry, towards conceptualising, designing, acquiring, constructing and maintaining the Maritime Materiel Capability.
• Promulgate the Technical Seaworthiness Framework (and associated policies, procedures and practices) for the effective delivery of engineering functions across the Capability System Lifecycle by engineering personnel across Defence and Industry.
• Consistently apply of defence-wide technical and business processes and business in the execution of Navy engineering functions.
• Capture requirements for engineers and technologists; then develop and maintain a workforce management plan, education and training strategy and career management plans, which enable HNE to foresee, plan and meet the demand for engineering and technical personnel and skills across Defence and Industry.
Execute• Review, certify and accept the technical capability of platforms to provide confidence to the Navy on a
platform’s capability to ‘Fight and Win at Sea’.
• Assure the performance of the technical capability of platforms to the Statement of Operating Intent (SOI), by monitoring technical performance metrics and conducting spot audits and inspections; to ensure adherence to the applicable standards, regulations and performance standards in line with the operating environment.
• Certify engineering organisations and personnel to perform engineering functions required for the design, construction and maintenance of the technical capability of platforms.
• Review and approve (as per delegation from HNE) the Through Life Engineering Management Plans (TLEMP) at the time of acquisition and throughout the lifetime of Maritime Materiel.
Support• Provide guidance and mentoring to practising naval engineers and technologists across Defence and
Industry.
• Provide professional input to stakeholders (e.g. SPOs, capability managers, commanders, etc.) on naval engineering related matters as required.
NAVA
L EN
GINE
ERIN
G ST
RATE
GIC
PLAN
10
OUR VISION is to....Deliver seaworthy materiel to enable us to Fight and Win at Sea.
OUR MISSION is to....Conceptualise, design, construct and maintain maritime materiel, while assuring, certifying and monitoring the technical seaworthiness of that materiel over its lifecycle through technical mastery and business excellence; with a professional workforce across Defence and Industry.
OUR PRIMARY GOAL IS...By2017,enableallplatformstomeettheirtechnicalcapabilityrequirementsas stated in the Navy’s Statement of Operating Intent.
Naval Engineering plans to achieve this by pursuing four main goals:
Goal 1: Ensure HNE is established and recognised as the authority for defining the Naval Engineering functions that will deliver seaworthy materiel throughout the entire lifecycle.
Goal 2: Implement a risk based assurance model that provides confidence to the Chief of Navy, in the seaworthiness of materiel over the lifecycle.
Goal 3: Develop, maintain and improve engineering and maintenance support provided to materiel through the fostering of technical mastery.
Goal 4: Rebuild the naval engineering workforce to ensure that it is professionally competent, aligned and prepared to meet the present and future demands of Defence and Industry.
NAVA
L EN
GINE
ERIN
G S
TRAT
EGIC
PLA
N
11
NAVY VALUES1
• Honour is the fundamental value on which the Navy’s and each person’s reputation depends. To demonstrate honour demands honesty, courage, integrity and loyalty and to consistently behave in a way that is becoming and worthwhile.
• Honesty is always being truthful, knowing and doing what is right for the Navy and ourselves.
• Courage is the strength of character to do what is right in the face of personal adversity, danger or threat.
• Integrity is the display of truth, honesty and fairness that gains respect and trust from others.
• Loyalty is being committed to each other and to our duty of service to Australia.
DEFENCE VALUES2
• Professionalism is striving for excellence in everything we do.
• Loyalty is being committed to each other and to Defence
• Integrity is doing what is right
• Courage is the strength of character to honour our convictions (moral courage) and bravery in the face of personal harm (physical courage)
• Innovation is actively looking for better ways of doing our business
• Teamwork is working together with respect, trust and a sense collective purpose
DMO BEHAVIOURS3
• Outcome focused: Respond to Defence’s needs
• Cost self awareness: Understand the true cost
• Managed urgency: Embrace a driven and agile approach
• Personal accountability:Beaccountabilityfor outcomes
• Business acumen: Understand industry’s motivations and work cooperatively to deliver value for money outcomes
• People management: Improve organisational capability by developing our people
• Organisational effectiveness: Strengthen governance to enhance effectiveness
• Simplify processes: Rationalise and standardise
• Building industry capability: Develop and implement strategies that contribute to industry and enable Defence
OUR BEHAVIOURS will be to... • work hard to deliver high quality results.
• do our jobs to the best of our ability and take pride in our achievements.
• be sensitive to changes in our working environment and ready to respond.
• provide impartial, comprehensive, timely and accurate advice.
• constantly seek to innovate and improve.
• strive for efficiency and cost-effectiveness
NAVY ENGINEERING CODE OF CONDUCT4
• at all times place their responsibility for the welfare, health and safety of the Navy community before their responsibility to sectional or private interests, or to other members;
• act in order to merit the trust of the Naval community and membership in the honour, integrity and dignity of the Members of the Naval Engineering Community and the profession at arms;
• offer services, or advise on or undertake engineering assignments, only in areas of their competence and shall practise in a careful and diligent manner;
• act with fairness, honesty and in good faith towards all in the Navy Engineering and Navy community;
• apply their skill and knowledge in the interest of the Navy for whom they shall act as faithful agents or advisers, without compromising the welfare, health and safety of the Navy community;
• take all reasonable steps to inform themselves and the Navy community of the social and environmental consequences of the actions and projects in which they are involved;
• express opinions, make statements or give evidence with fairness and honesty and on the basis of adequate knowledge;
• continue to develop relevant knowledge, skill and expertise throughout their careers and shall actively assist and encourage those under their direction to do likewise; and
• not assist, induce or be involved in a breach of these principles and shall support those who seek to uphold them.
1. Source: http://www.navy.gov.au/Values2. Source: http://www.defence.gov.au/publications/defence_values.pdf3. Source: http://intranet.defence.gov.au/dmoweb/sites/_home/comweb.asp?page=91597&Title=DMO%20Purpose,%20Vision%20%20Values4.Source:ABR6492Vol1:NavyTechnicalRegulationsManual(NTRM)
• always respect and recognise the contribution of fellow engineers and technicians.
• promote the wellbeing and development of the NE community.
• communicate effectively and regularly.
• uphold the professional ethos of engineering.
• consistently demonstrate integrity and merit the trust of our stakeholders.
• seek opportunities to learn and develop.
NAVA
L EN
GINE
ERIN
G ST
RATE
GIC
PLAN
12
Approach to Naval Engineering StrategyThe Engineering function is carried out widely within Defence and Industry and is central to the Maritime Capability Systems Lifecycle (CSL). It is a professional function carried out by skilled, trained and certified personnel, who follow professional standards and uphold the ethics and values of their profession, alongside the ethics, behaviours and values of the organisations they represent - Defence or Industry.
The Naval Engineering Strategy (NE Strategy), detailed herein, seeks to create and maintain a professional engineering and technical network which is respected and valued by all Maritime Capability stakeholders. It is based on the three underlying enablers for value creation in the public sector.
• Ensuring legitimacy and authorisation,
• Buildingoperationalcapability;and
• Delivering value.
Public Value
NAVA
L EN
GINE
ERIN
G S
TRAT
EGIC
PLA
N
13
Enabler 1: Ensuring Legitimacy and AuthorisationEnsuring and securing the right authority and legitimacy for the function is the first and most critical step in enabling value creation. Through his Statement of Direction, the Chief of Navy has provided clarity and delegated authority to the Head of Navy Engineering. NE Strategy (Goal 1) aims to further establish and recognise the authority of HNE over defining the Naval Engineering functions that will deliver seaworthy materiel through the entire lifecycle.
NE Strategy also aims to implement a risk based assurance model (Goal 2), which employs the appropriate regulation (internal and/or external) based on risk profile and provides traceability back to governing legislation. This will clarify the purpose of the regulations and provide further legitimacy to the assurance function of Naval Engineering.
Enabler 2: Building Operational CapabilityDeveloping strong operational capability provides confidence and the foundational strength to effectively deliver Naval Engineering output and create value. Building strength in operational capability requiresdevelopment underlying - processes and people.
NE Strategy targets the development of the engineering and technical people and processes through the goal to achieve ‘technical mastery and business excellence’ (Goal 3). The development of a ‘master-set’ for Naval Engineering functions and Through Life Engineering Management Plans for each class and platform are some of the strategies that will be adopted to achieve this goal.
The focus on people aspect is also to be addressed through (Goal 4), which includes strategies to develop workforce capability to meet the demands of the Naval Engineering function across the CSL and across Defence and Industry. Strategies to achieve workforce capability development will align, unite and develop Engineering personnel, irrespective of where they are located, i.e. Navy, Defence or Industry, under the leadership of the Head of Navy Engineering, as a professional community.
Goal 1: Ensure HNE is established and recognised as the authority for defining the Naval Engineering functions that will deliver seaworthy materiel throughout the entire lifecycle.
Goal 2: Implement a risk based assurance model that provides confidence to the Chief of Navy, in the seaworthiness of materiel over the lifecycle.
Goal 3: Develop, maintain and improve engineering and maintenance support provided to materiel through the fostering of technical mastery.
Goal 4: Rebuild the naval engineering workforce to ensure that it is professionally competent, aligned and prepared to meet the present and future demands of Defence and Industry.
NAVA
L EN
GINE
ERIN
G ST
RATE
GIC
PLAN
14
Enabler 3: Delivering ValueIn order to deliver value effectively, there is a need to clearly define the goals and objectives (outcomes) and to establish a process of measurement to ensure planned outcomes are achieved and value is created.
Embedded within this Strategic Plan (Goals 1 & 3) are strategies such as the development of a Naval EngineeringBlueprint,whichwillclearlyarticulatethevalueandcontributionoftheNavalEngineeringfunctionand implementation of performance management and assurance functions that will provide measurement and monitoring of planned value creation. A stakeholder engagement and communication strategy will also be developed to ensure that the Naval Engineering function is recognised and appreciated by its stakeholders.
The Navy Engineering functions must also be delivered within the standardised framework of Navy and Defence materiel and capability business processes. Delivering value within the Defence-wide context is a key indicator of the effectiveness and sustainability of the Navy Engineering function.
NAVA
L EN
GINE
ERIN
G S
TRAT
EGIC
PLA
N
15
Nava
l Eng
inee
ring
Goa
ls a
nd O
bjec
tives
201
3 –
2017
GOA
L 1:
En
sure
HNE
is e
stab
lishe
d an
d re
cogn
ised
as
the
auth
ority
for d
efini
ng th
e Na
val E
ngin
eerin
g fu
nctio
ns th
at w
ill d
eliv
er s
eaw
orth
y m
ater
iel t
hrou
ghou
t the
ent
ire li
fecy
cle.
#Ob
ject
ive
Stra
tegi
esKe
y Pe
rfor
man
ce
Indi
cato
rsTi
me
Fram
esRe
spon
sibi
lity
1.1
The
Head
of N
aval
Eng
inee
ring
is re
cogn
ised
, em
powe
red
and
held
acc
ount
able
for t
he
seaw
orth
ines
s of
mat
erie
l.
•Ch
ief o
f the
Nav
y to
pro
vide
a ro
le s
tate
men
t for
Na
val E
ngin
eerin
g gi
ving
the
func
tion
legi
timac
y, au
thor
ity a
nd re
quire
d pe
rform
ance
out
com
es in
ac
cord
ance
with
Nav
y’s S
trate
gic
Plan
.•
Head
of N
aval
Eng
inee
ring
(HNE
) to
have
de
lega
ted
auth
ority
for t
he N
aval
Eng
inee
ring
func
tion
(Ser
vice
s an
d Pr
oduc
ts) t
hrou
gh th
e Ca
pabi
lity
Syst
ems
Life
cycl
e (C
SL) a
nd w
ill
be a
ccou
ntab
le fo
r the
func
tion’
s de
liver
y ac
ross
Def
ence
and
Indu
stry
and
with
in th
e fra
mew
ork
of a
sta
ndar
dise
d De
fenc
e M
ater
iel
deliv
ery
syst
em.
•HN
E is
to e
stab
lish
a Te
chni
cal S
eawo
rthin
ess
Boar
d,w
hich
will
be
resp
onsi
ble
fora
ssur
ing
the
qual
ity o
f Nav
al E
ngin
eerin
g Se
rvic
es a
nd
Prod
ucts
acr
oss
the
CSL,
del
ivere
d by
Def
ence
an
d In
dust
ry.
•HN
E is
to d
eleg
ate
the
resp
onsi
bilit
y to
Ex
ecut
ive in
-cha
rge
of th
e di
ffere
nt d
elive
ry
grou
ps (M
SD, F
EG a
nd C
DG) a
nd N
avy
Engi
neer
ing
Dire
ctor
ates
, res
pons
ible
for t
he
deliv
ery
of e
ngin
eerin
g se
rvic
es d
urin
g th
e di
ffere
nt p
hase
s of
the
CSL
and
prod
ucts
to
Defe
nce
and
Indu
stry
.
•Au
thor
ised
role
sta
tem
ent f
or
HNE
from
CN.
•De
lega
tion
of a
utho
rity
to
HNE
from
CN/
CDF
to c
ontro
l Na
val E
ngin
eerin
g fu
nctio
n.•
Seaw
orth
ines
sBo
ard
esta
blis
hed
and
oper
atio
nal.
•HN
E on
ward
s de
lega
tion
of re
spon
sibi
lity
to M
SD,
FEG
and
CDG
for d
elive
ry o
f en
gine
erin
g fu
nctio
ns a
cros
s th
e CS
L.•
Alig
nmen
t of N
avy
Engi
neer
ing
Mat
erie
l del
ivery
to
sta
ndar
dise
d De
fenc
e pr
oces
ses.
12 m
onth
sA:
HNE
(ass
ures
, mon
itors
, as
sess
es q
ualit
y of
NE
func
tion
serv
ices
and
pro
duct
s).
R: E
xecu
tive
in-c
harg
e of
del
ivery
e.
g., M
SD, F
EG, o
r CDG
, DGT
S (e
nsur
es d
elive
ry o
f NE
func
tion
serv
ices
and
pro
duct
s).
1.2
All m
embe
rs D
efen
ce a
nd In
dust
ry re
cogn
ise
Nava
l Eng
inee
ring’
s va
lue
and
cont
ribut
ion
to
seaw
orth
ines
s of
mat
erie
l ove
r the
life
cycl
e.
•De
velo
p Na
val E
ngin
eerin
g’s
Stra
tegi
c In
tent
, St
rate
gic
Plan
and
Blu
eprin
tto
artic
ulat
eits
va
lue
and
cont
ribut
ion
to s
eawo
rthin
ess
of
mat
erie
l thr
ough
out t
he li
fecy
cle.
•Na
val E
ngin
eerin
g St
rate
gic
Inte
nt.
•Co
rpor
ate
(Stra
tegy
) Pla
n.•
NEF
utur
eBl
uepr
int.
•An
nual
Pla
ns.
12 m
onth
sA/
R: H
NE
1.3
NE C
omm
unic
atio
n Pl
an c
onve
ys N
aval
En
gine
erin
g va
lue
to D
efen
ce a
nd In
dust
ry.
•He
ad o
f Nav
al E
ngin
eerin
g to
impl
emen
t a
com
mun
icat
ion
and
stak
ehol
der e
ngag
emen
t st
rate
gy to
pro
mul
gate
awa
rene
ss, r
ecog
nitio
n an
d fe
edba
ck to
ulti
mat
ely
achi
eve
bette
r un
ders
tand
ing
and
appr
ecia
tion
of th
e va
lue
of n
aval
eng
inee
ring.
•NE
Com
mun
icat
ion
and
Stak
ehol
der M
anag
emen
t Pl
an.
12 m
onth
sA/
R: H
NE
NAVA
L EN
GINE
ERIN
G ST
RATE
GIC
PLAN
16
GOA
L 2:
Im
plem
ent a
risk
bas
ed a
ssur
ance
mod
el th
at p
rovi
des
confi
denc
e to
the
Chie
f of N
avy
in th
e se
awor
thin
ess
of m
ater
iel o
ver t
he li
fecy
cle.
#Ob
ject
ive
Stra
tegi
esKe
y Pe
rfor
man
ce
Indi
cato
rsTi
me
Fram
esRe
spon
sibi
lity
2.1
HNE
enab
les
com
plia
nce
with
gov
erni
ng W
orkp
lace
He
alth
&
Sa
fety,
En
viro
nmen
tal,
Mar
itim
e an
d De
fenc
e le
gisl
atio
n, re
gula
tions
and
pro
cess
es.
•HN
E to
laun
ch a
wor
k pr
ogra
mm
e to
iden
tify
all r
elev
ant g
over
ning
legi
slat
ions
app
licab
le
to th
e NE
func
tions
.•
HNE
to le
ad a
nd e
stab
lish
the
engi
neer
ing
regu
latio
ns, p
olic
ies,
pro
cedu
res
and
proc
esse
s th
at a
lign
with
gov
erni
ng
legi
slat
ion
for O
ccup
atio
nal H
ealth
& S
afet
y, En
viro
nmen
tal,
Mar
itim
e an
d De
fenc
e le
gisl
atio
n, re
gula
tions
and
eng
inee
ring
proc
esse
s.
•HN
E to
initi
ate
and
lead
wor
k pr
ogra
mm
es to
re
view
and
ens
ure
legi
timac
y an
d cu
rrenc
y of
Nav
al E
ngin
eerin
g re
gula
tions
, pol
icy,
proc
edur
es a
nd p
roce
sses
in a
ccor
danc
e wi
th
gove
rnin
g le
gisl
atio
n, D
efen
ce re
gula
tions
and
st
anda
rdis
ed p
roce
sses
.
•Na
val E
ngin
eerin
g As
sura
nce
and
Com
plia
nce
Envi
ronm
ent
is d
efine
d.•
Adhe
renc
e to
gov
erni
ng
legi
slat
ion
and
defe
nce-
wide
pol
icie
s an
d re
gula
tions
is m
onito
red
and
com
mun
icat
ed.
•HN
E le
vel o
f eng
agem
ent
with
ext
erna
l aut
horit
ies
resp
onsi
ble
for d
evel
opm
ent
of le
gisl
ative
and
pro
cedu
ral
guid
elin
es.
18 m
onth
sA:
HNE
R: N
omin
ated
del
egat
ed a
utho
ritie
s.
2.2
Impl
emen
t a
risk
base
d as
sura
nce
mod
el t
hat
assu
res,
ce
rtifie
s an
d m
onito
rs
the
mat
erie
l’s
seaw
orth
ines
s ov
er it
s lif
ecyc
le.
•HN
E m
ust d
eter
min
e th
e ap
prop
riate
as
sura
nce
mod
el (D
efen
ce In
stru
ctio
n DI
(G)
LOG
4-5-
012
and
ANAO
Ris
k M
anag
emen
t Be
tterp
ract
ice
guid
e)th
ato
ptim
ises
pro
cess
ef
ficie
ncy
agai
nst o
pera
tiona
l out
com
es,
and
in c
onju
nctio
n wi
th p
rodu
ct a
ssur
ance
, pr
ovid
es c
onfid
ence
in m
ater
iel s
eawo
rthin
ess
over
its
lifec
ycle
. −Es
tabl
ish
risk
base
d as
sura
nce,
cer
tifica
tion
and
mon
itorin
g fra
mew
ork
that
pro
vide
s co
nfide
nce
in th
e pl
atfo
rm’s
tech
nica
l ca
pabi
lity
over
its
lifec
ycle
. −En
sure
lice
nsin
g bo
dies
are
est
ablis
hed
as p
art o
f the
Tech
nica
l Sea
worth
ines
s As
sura
nce
fram
ewor
k ce
rtify
ing
the
plat
form
s te
chni
cal s
eawo
rthin
ess
over
its
lifec
ycle
.•
Esta
blis
h a
Tech
nica
l Sea
worth
ines
s As
sura
nce
func
tion
that
will
insp
ect a
pla
tform
’s co
mpl
ianc
e an
d pe
rform
ance
aga
inst
Nav
al
Engi
neer
ing
datu
m, s
tand
ards
and
the
assu
ranc
e fra
mew
ork.
•Es
tabl
ish
enfo
rcea
ble
inst
rum
ents
that
pr
omul
gate
adh
eren
ce to
the
legi
slat
ion,
re
gula
tions
and
sta
ndar
ds.
•Na
val E
ngin
eerin
g ris
k ba
sed
assu
ranc
e Co
mpl
ianc
e M
odel
de
velo
ped
and
impl
emen
ted.
•Te
chni
cal S
eawo
rthin
ess
Assu
ranc
e Ag
ency
(TSA
A) is
es
tabl
ishe
d an
d op
erat
iona
l.•
Appr
opria
te in
stru
ctio
ns/
orde
rs a
re in
pla
ce
prov
idin
g pe
nalti
es th
at
may
be
enfo
rced
for n
on-
com
plia
nce.
18 m
onth
sA:
HNE
R: N
CAA,
lice
nsin
g bo
dies
and
ot
her d
esig
nate
d te
chni
cal
auth
oriti
es*.
(* H
NE to
est
ablis
h as
sura
nce
func
tions
and
pro
vide
app
ropr
iate
de
lega
tions
.)
NAVA
L EN
GINE
ERIN
G S
TRAT
EGIC
PLA
N
17
#Ob
ject
ive
Stra
tegi
esKe
y Pe
rfor
man
ce
Indi
cato
rsTi
me
Fram
esRe
spon
sibi
lity
2.3
Impl
emen
t adm
inis
trativ
e po
licie
s, p
roce
sses
an
d pr
oced
ures
to g
ive e
ffect
to th
e le
gisl
ative
fra
mew
ork
and
supp
ort t
he a
ssur
ance
mod
el
in p
rovi
ding
con
fiden
ce in
the
mat
erie
l’s
seaw
orth
ines
s ov
er it
s lif
ecyc
le.
•HN
E to
iden
tify
all a
dmin
istra
tive
polic
ies,
pr
oced
ures
and
pro
cess
es re
quire
d to
effe
ctive
ly e
xecu
te th
e as
sura
nce
requ
irem
ents
and
com
ply
with
gov
erni
ng
legi
slat
ions
and
def
ence
-wid
e pr
oces
ses.
•HN
E to
dev
elop
the
fram
ewor
k of
pol
icy,
proc
edur
es a
nd p
roce
sses
that
opt
imis
e ad
min
istra
tive
effo
rt, w
hils
t pro
vidi
ng
trans
pare
ncy,
acco
unta
bilit
y an
d tra
ceab
ility
to
the
assu
ranc
e fra
mew
ork
and
the
gove
rnin
g le
gisl
atio
n.•
HNE
to e
nsur
e th
e ac
cura
cy, c
urre
ncy
and
rele
vanc
e of
adm
inis
trativ
e po
licie
s,
proc
edur
es a
nd p
roce
sses
.
•Na
val E
ngin
eerin
g Po
licy
and
Assu
ranc
e Fr
amew
ork
is
deve
lope
d.•
Polic
ies,
pro
cedu
res
and
inst
ruct
ions
iden
tified
by
the
Nava
l Eng
inee
ring
polic
y fra
mew
ork
are
curre
nt, a
ccur
ate
and
rele
vant
.
24 m
onth
sA:
HNE
R:
Nom
inat
ed a
utho
rised
del
egat
es.
NAVA
L EN
GINE
ERIN
G ST
RATE
GIC
PLAN
18
#Ob
ject
ive
Stra
tegi
esKe
y Pe
rfor
man
ce
Indi
cato
rsTi
me
Fram
esRe
spon
sibi
lity
2.3
Impl
emen
t adm
inis
trativ
e po
licie
s, p
roce
sses
an
d pr
oced
ures
to g
ive e
ffect
to th
e le
gisl
ative
fra
mew
ork
and
supp
ort t
he a
ssur
ance
mod
el
in p
rovi
ding
con
fiden
ce in
the
mat
erie
l’s
seaw
orth
ines
s ov
er it
s lif
ecyc
le.
•HN
E to
iden
tify
all a
dmin
istra
tive
polic
ies,
pr
oced
ures
and
pro
cess
es re
quire
d to
effe
ctive
ly e
xecu
te th
e as
sura
nce
requ
irem
ents
and
com
ply
with
gov
erni
ng
legi
slat
ions
and
def
ence
-wid
e pr
oces
ses.
•HN
E to
dev
elop
the
fram
ewor
k of
pol
icy,
proc
edur
es a
nd p
roce
sses
that
opt
imis
e ad
min
istra
tive
effo
rt, w
hils
t pro
vidi
ng
trans
pare
ncy,
acco
unta
bilit
y an
d tra
ceab
ility
to
the
assu
ranc
e fra
mew
ork
and
the
gove
rnin
g le
gisl
atio
n.•
HNE
to e
nsur
e th
e ac
cura
cy, c
urre
ncy
and
rele
vanc
e of
adm
inis
trativ
e po
licie
s,
proc
edur
es a
nd p
roce
sses
.
•Na
val E
ngin
eerin
g Po
licy
and
Assu
ranc
e Fr
amew
ork
is
deve
lope
d.•
Polic
ies,
pro
cedu
res
and
inst
ruct
ions
iden
tified
by
the
Nava
l Eng
inee
ring
polic
y fra
mew
ork
are
curre
nt, a
ccur
ate
and
rele
vant
.
24 m
onth
sA:
HNE
R:
Nom
inat
ed a
utho
rised
del
egat
es.
GOA
L 3:
De
velo
p, m
aint
ain
and
impr
ove
engi
neer
ing
and
mai
nten
ance
sup
port
pro
vide
d to
mat
erie
l thr
ough
the
fost
erin
g of
tech
nica
l mas
tery
.
#Ob
ject
ive
Stra
tegi
esKe
y Pe
rfor
man
ce
Indi
cato
rsTi
me
Fram
esRe
spon
sibi
lity
3.1
Thro
ugh-
life
Engi
neer
ing
Man
agem
ent P
lans
(T
LEM
P) th
at a
re a
ppro
ved
by th
e Te
chni
cal
Seaw
orth
ines
s Au
thor
ity a
nd p
rovi
de a
co
nsis
tent
and
com
preh
ensi
ve v
iew
of th
e ‘w
hole
-of-l
ife’ e
ngin
eerin
g ne
eds
at th
e cl
ass
and
plat
form
leve
ls.
•HN
E to
lead
and
driv
e wo
rk p
rogr
amm
es to
de
fine
the
NE fu
nctio
nal ‘m
aste
r set
’ of b
est
prac
tice
func
tions
and
pro
duct
s, ac
ross
the
CSL.
•Na
val E
ngin
eerin
g to
dev
elop
and
impl
emen
t pl
ans
for t
he d
iffer
ent c
lass
es, p
latfo
rms
and
equi
pmen
t to
cons
truct
, ope
rate
, mon
itor a
nd
mai
ntai
n th
e te
chni
cal c
apab
ility
thro
ugh
its li
fe.
−Id
entif
y fu
nctio
ns a
nd p
rodu
cts
from
the
‘mas
ter s
et’ t
hat a
re re
quire
d to
mee
t a
plat
form
’s te
chni
cal c
apab
ility
requ
irem
ents
wi
thin
app
ropr
iate
bud
geta
ry c
onst
rain
ts.
−M
ap th
e fu
nctio
ns a
nd p
rodu
cts
acro
ss th
e CS
L to
cap
ture
the
whol
e of
life
eng
inee
ring
need
s. −Pu
blis
h th
e st
anda
rds
for T
LEM
P fo
r all
clas
ses,
pla
tform
s an
d eq
uipm
ent.
•De
liver
y gr
oups
(MSD
, FEG
, CDG
, DTS
etc
.) to
en
sure
that
the
info
rmat
ion
requ
irem
ents
of
TLEM
Ps a
re a
vaila
ble
and
accu
rate
: −fo
r all
clas
ses,
pla
tform
s an
d eq
uipm
ent,
−fo
r the
CSL
pha
se th
at th
ey e
ach
man
age;
an
d −en
sure
the
info
rmat
ion
prov
ided
in th
e TL
EMPs
are
con
sist
ent w
ith s
tand
ards
pr
escr
ibed
by
HNE
and
acro
ss D
efen
ce.
•HN
E to
revi
ew (a
dher
ence
to s
tand
ards
) and
ap
prov
e th
e TL
EMPs
for a
ll cu
rrent
and
futu
re
tech
nica
l cap
abili
ty.
•NE
func
tiona
l gol
d-se
t is
defin
ed a
nd a
ppro
ved
by
HNE.
•TL
EMP
stan
dard
s ar
e de
fined
fo
r eac
h cl
ass
and
plat
form
ty
pe a
nd a
ppro
ved
by H
NE.
•TL
EMPs
that
mee
t the
st
anda
rds
set a
cros
s De
fenc
e an
d th
roug
h HN
E ar
e av
aila
ble
for a
ll cl
asse
s an
d at
leas
t 95%
of o
pera
tiona
l pl
atfo
rms.
36 m
onth
sA:
HNE
R:
Nom
inat
ed a
utho
rised
del
egat
es.
NAVA
L EN
GINE
ERIN
G S
TRAT
EGIC
PLA
N
19
#Ob
ject
ive
Stra
tegi
esKe
y Pe
rfor
man
ce
Indi
cato
rsTi
me
Fram
esRe
spon
sibi
lity
3.2
Gove
rnan
ce fr
amew
ork
is im
plem
ente
d th
at c
lear
ly a
rticu
late
s ac
coun
tabi
litie
s an
d re
spon
sibi
litie
s fo
r the
del
ivery
of N
aval
En
gine
erin
g ou
tput
s fo
r a p
latfo
rm a
cros
s th
e CS
L.
•HN
E to
est
ablis
h an
d im
plem
ent t
he
gove
rnan
ce fr
amew
ork
whic
h de
lega
tes
the
appr
opria
te a
utho
rity
and
iden
tifies
the
resp
onsi
bilit
ies
for t
he d
elive
ry o
f Nav
al
Engi
neer
ing’
s fu
nctio
ns a
nd p
rodu
cts
to
resp
ectiv
e ag
enci
es s
uch
as D
efen
ce a
nd
Indu
stry
.•
HNE
to re
view
, rev
ise
and
upda
te a
ll cu
rrent
de
lega
tions
and
ens
ure
that
they
are
alig
ned
to th
e Na
val E
ngin
eerin
g St
rate
gic
Plan
, as
sura
nce
mod
el a
nd g
over
nanc
e fra
mew
ork.
•HN
E to
ens
ure
rele
vant
ord
ers
are
impl
emen
ted
to e
nfor
ce p
rope
r dis
char
ge
of d
eleg
ated
aut
horit
y, to
ward
s ex
ecut
ion
of
man
date
d re
spon
sibi
litie
s.
•NE
gov
erna
nce
fram
ewor
k es
tabl
ishe
d fro
m H
NE d
own
to th
e le
vel o
f eac
h te
chni
cal
capa
bilit
y an
d te
chni
cian
.•
Tech
nica
l del
egat
ions
for a
re
curre
nt fo
r at l
east
95%
of
al N
E pe
rson
nel a
nd 9
8% o
f en
gine
erin
g or
gani
satio
ns.
18 m
onth
sA:
HNE
R:
Nom
inat
ed a
utho
rised
del
egat
es.
3.3
An In
form
atio
n M
anag
emen
t Fun
ctio
n, w
hich
ca
n st
anda
rdis
e, s
ynch
roni
se a
nd p
rovi
de a
n in
tegr
ated
‘sin
gle
sour
ce o
f tru
th’ f
or a
ll te
chni
cal
data
cap
ture
d an
d m
aint
aine
d ac
ross
the
CSL
for
a cl
ass
by d
iffer
ent e
ngin
eerin
g or
gani
satio
ns.
•HN
E to
laun
ch a
nd d
rive
a wo
rk p
rogr
amm
e to
co
nduc
t a c
ompl
ete
stoc
k ta
ke o
f the
diff
eren
t so
urce
s of
tech
nica
l dat
a an
d de
velo
p an
ap
proa
ch to
sta
ndar
dise
and
syn
chro
nise
the
capt
ure
of th
e te
chni
cal d
ata
acro
ss C
SL.
•HN
E to
laun
ch a
nd d
rive
a wo
rk p
rogr
amm
e to
exp
lore
, dev
elop
and
aut
horis
e ap
prop
riate
in
form
atio
n m
anag
emen
t tec
hnol
ogie
s an
d pr
actic
es, s
uch
as c
omm
on w
orki
ng
envi
ronm
ents
, to
supp
ort a
n in
tegr
ated
vie
w ac
ross
the
CSL.
−Ex
plor
e op
tions
ava
ilabl
e wi
thin
Def
ence
and
th
ose
used
in In
dust
ry b
y ot
her N
avie
s an
d m
erch
ant fl
eet o
pera
tors
. •
Auth
oris
ed E
ngin
eerin
g Or
gani
satio
ns to
im
plem
ent t
he a
utho
rised
info
rmat
ion
tech
nolo
gies
and
pra
ctic
es to
cap
ture
thei
r te
chni
cal d
ata.
•St
ock
take
of a
ll so
urce
s of
te
chni
cal d
ata
is c
ompl
eted
.•
Appr
opria
te in
form
atio
n m
anag
emen
t tec
hnol
ogy
has
been
iden
tified
with
app
rove
d fu
ndin
g fo
r im
plem
enta
tion.
•In
tegr
ated
info
rmat
ion
man
agem
ent s
yste
m
impl
emen
ted
and
auth
oris
ed.
24 m
onth
sA:
HNE
R: N
omin
ated
aut
horis
ed d
eleg
ates
.
3.4.
A Pe
rform
ance
Man
agem
ent F
unct
ion
that
m
onito
rs a
nd e
valu
ates
tech
nica
l cap
abili
ty o
f pl
atfo
rms
agai
nst t
heir
Stat
emen
t Ope
ratin
g In
tent
and
ena
bles
the
plat
form
s to
evo
lve, a
dapt
to
thei
r ope
ratin
g en
viro
nmen
t and
faci
litat
es
cont
inuo
us im
prov
emen
t.
•HN
E to
dev
elop
and
impl
emen
t a P
erfo
rman
ce
Man
agem
ent f
unct
ion
that
can
mea
sure
, m
onito
r and
repo
rt ef
fect
ively
and
in a
tim
ely
man
ner t
echn
ical
per
form
ance
of p
latfo
rms
agai
nst t
he S
OI.
•Au
thor
ised
del
egat
es (o
rgan
isat
ions
and
in
divi
dual
s) to
cap
ture
and
repo
rt (m
ake
avai
labl
e) p
erfo
rman
ce m
etric
s wi
thin
the
man
date
d tim
efra
mes
.
•Pe
rform
ance
Man
agem
ent
stan
dard
s ar
e de
fined
by
HNE.
•M
etric
s as
per
per
form
ance
m
anag
emen
t sta
ndar
ds a
re
bein
g ca
ptur
ed.
18 m
onth
sA:
HNE
R:
Nom
inat
ed a
utho
rised
del
egat
es.
NAVA
L EN
GINE
ERIN
G ST
RATE
GIC
PLAN
20
#Ob
ject
ive
Stra
tegi
esKe
y Pe
rfor
man
ce
Indi
cato
rsTi
me
Fram
esRe
spon
sibi
lity
3.2
Gove
rnan
ce fr
amew
ork
is im
plem
ente
d th
at c
lear
ly a
rticu
late
s ac
coun
tabi
litie
s an
d re
spon
sibi
litie
s fo
r the
del
ivery
of N
aval
En
gine
erin
g ou
tput
s fo
r a p
latfo
rm a
cros
s th
e CS
L.
•HN
E to
est
ablis
h an
d im
plem
ent t
he
gove
rnan
ce fr
amew
ork
whic
h de
lega
tes
the
appr
opria
te a
utho
rity
and
iden
tifies
the
resp
onsi
bilit
ies
for t
he d
elive
ry o
f Nav
al
Engi
neer
ing’
s fu
nctio
ns a
nd p
rodu
cts
to
resp
ectiv
e ag
enci
es s
uch
as D
efen
ce a
nd
Indu
stry
.•
HNE
to re
view
, rev
ise
and
upda
te a
ll cu
rrent
de
lega
tions
and
ens
ure
that
they
are
alig
ned
to th
e Na
val E
ngin
eerin
g St
rate
gic
Plan
, as
sura
nce
mod
el a
nd g
over
nanc
e fra
mew
ork.
•HN
E to
ens
ure
rele
vant
ord
ers
are
impl
emen
ted
to e
nfor
ce p
rope
r dis
char
ge
of d
eleg
ated
aut
horit
y, to
ward
s ex
ecut
ion
of
man
date
d re
spon
sibi
litie
s.
•NE
gov
erna
nce
fram
ewor
k es
tabl
ishe
d fro
m H
NE d
own
to th
e le
vel o
f eac
h te
chni
cal
capa
bilit
y an
d te
chni
cian
.•
Tech
nica
l del
egat
ions
for a
re
curre
nt fo
r at l
east
95%
of
al N
E pe
rson
nel a
nd 9
8% o
f en
gine
erin
g or
gani
satio
ns.
18 m
onth
sA:
HNE
R:
Nom
inat
ed a
utho
rised
del
egat
es.
3.3
An In
form
atio
n M
anag
emen
t Fun
ctio
n, w
hich
ca
n st
anda
rdis
e, s
ynch
roni
se a
nd p
rovi
de a
n in
tegr
ated
‘sin
gle
sour
ce o
f tru
th’ f
or a
ll te
chni
cal
data
cap
ture
d an
d m
aint
aine
d ac
ross
the
CSL
for
a cl
ass
by d
iffer
ent e
ngin
eerin
g or
gani
satio
ns.
•HN
E to
laun
ch a
nd d
rive
a wo
rk p
rogr
amm
e to
co
nduc
t a c
ompl
ete
stoc
k ta
ke o
f the
diff
eren
t so
urce
s of
tech
nica
l dat
a an
d de
velo
p an
ap
proa
ch to
sta
ndar
dise
and
syn
chro
nise
the
capt
ure
of th
e te
chni
cal d
ata
acro
ss C
SL.
•HN
E to
laun
ch a
nd d
rive
a wo
rk p
rogr
amm
e to
exp
lore
, dev
elop
and
aut
horis
e ap
prop
riate
in
form
atio
n m
anag
emen
t tec
hnol
ogie
s an
d pr
actic
es, s
uch
as c
omm
on w
orki
ng
envi
ronm
ents
, to
supp
ort a
n in
tegr
ated
vie
w ac
ross
the
CSL.
−Ex
plor
e op
tions
ava
ilabl
e wi
thin
Def
ence
and
th
ose
used
in In
dust
ry b
y ot
her N
avie
s an
d m
erch
ant fl
eet o
pera
tors
. •
Auth
oris
ed E
ngin
eerin
g Or
gani
satio
ns to
im
plem
ent t
he a
utho
rised
info
rmat
ion
tech
nolo
gies
and
pra
ctic
es to
cap
ture
thei
r te
chni
cal d
ata.
•St
ock
take
of a
ll so
urce
s of
te
chni
cal d
ata
is c
ompl
eted
.•
Appr
opria
te in
form
atio
n m
anag
emen
t tec
hnol
ogy
has
been
iden
tified
with
app
rove
d fu
ndin
g fo
r im
plem
enta
tion.
•In
tegr
ated
info
rmat
ion
man
agem
ent s
yste
m
impl
emen
ted
and
auth
oris
ed.
24 m
onth
sA:
HNE
R: N
omin
ated
aut
horis
ed d
eleg
ates
.
3.4.
A Pe
rform
ance
Man
agem
ent F
unct
ion
that
m
onito
rs a
nd e
valu
ates
tech
nica
l cap
abili
ty o
f pl
atfo
rms
agai
nst t
heir
Stat
emen
t Ope
ratin
g In
tent
and
ena
bles
the
plat
form
s to
evo
lve, a
dapt
to
thei
r ope
ratin
g en
viro
nmen
t and
faci
litat
es
cont
inuo
us im
prov
emen
t.
•HN
E to
dev
elop
and
impl
emen
t a P
erfo
rman
ce
Man
agem
ent f
unct
ion
that
can
mea
sure
, m
onito
r and
repo
rt ef
fect
ively
and
in a
tim
ely
man
ner t
echn
ical
per
form
ance
of p
latfo
rms
agai
nst t
he S
OI.
•Au
thor
ised
del
egat
es (o
rgan
isat
ions
and
in
divi
dual
s) to
cap
ture
and
repo
rt (m
ake
avai
labl
e) p
erfo
rman
ce m
etric
s wi
thin
the
man
date
d tim
efra
mes
.
•Pe
rform
ance
Man
agem
ent
stan
dard
s ar
e de
fined
by
HNE.
•M
etric
s as
per
per
form
ance
m
anag
emen
t sta
ndar
ds a
re
bein
g ca
ptur
ed.
18 m
onth
sA:
HNE
R:
Nom
inat
ed a
utho
rised
del
egat
es.
GOA
L 4:
Re
build
the
nava
l eng
inee
ring
wor
kfor
ce to
ens
ure
that
it is
pro
fess
iona
lly c
ompe
tent
, alig
ned
and
prep
ared
to m
eet t
he p
rese
nt a
nd fu
ture
dem
ands
of D
efen
ce a
nd In
dust
ry.
#Ob
ject
ive
Stra
tegi
esKe
y Pe
rfor
man
ce
Indi
cato
rsTi
me
Fram
esRe
spon
sibi
lity
4.1
HNE
ensu
res
the
engi
neer
ing
inpu
t to
a wo
rkfo
rce
stra
tegy
mee
ts b
oth
pres
ent a
nd fu
ture
dem
and
requ
irem
ents
.
STRU
CTUR
AL•
HNE
to le
ad w
ork
prog
ram
mes
to c
ondu
ct a
n as
sess
men
t of p
rese
nt a
nd fu
ture
ava
ilabi
lity
and
dem
and
situ
atio
n fo
r tra
ined
and
cer
tified
en
gine
erin
g pe
rson
nel a
cros
s De
fenc
e an
d In
dust
ry.
•HN
E to
est
ablis
h wo
rkfo
rce
man
agem
ent
prin
cipl
es th
at e
ncou
rage
inte
grat
ed c
lass
m
anag
emen
t acr
oss
the
CSL,
shar
ing
of
engi
neer
ing
and
tech
nica
l res
ourc
es, k
nowl
edge
an
d in
form
atio
n be
twee
n De
fenc
e an
d In
dust
ry.•
HNE
to in
itiat
e wo
rk p
rogr
amm
e to
dev
elop
an
d pu
blis
h a
futu
re s
tate
wor
kfor
ce
profi
le, i
nclu
ding
cle
ar a
rticu
latio
n of
Nav
al
Engi
neer
ing
care
er p
athw
ays,
incl
udin
g tra
inin
g pr
ogra
mm
es, fl
exib
ility,
mob
ility
an
d po
rtabi
lity
optio
ns to
ena
ble
Nava
l En
gine
erin
g to
attr
act,
recr
uit a
nd re
tain
a
skill
ed a
nd ta
lent
ed w
orkf
orce
. •
HNE
to in
itiat
e wo
rk p
rogr
amm
e to
iden
tify
and
esta
blis
h sp
ecifi
c, s
peci
alis
ed s
kills
en
viro
nmen
ts (w
here
nec
essa
ry),
to e
nabl
e th
e de
liver
y of
spe
cial
ised
Nav
al E
ngin
eerin
g re
quire
men
ts.
BEHA
VIOU
RAL
•HN
E to
est
ablis
h pr
inci
ples
of e
ffect
ive
dele
gatio
n to
cre
ate
a cu
lture
of d
eleg
atin
g de
cisi
on m
akin
g an
d ac
cept
ance
of
resp
onsi
bilit
y to
an
appr
opria
te le
vel o
f au
thor
ity a
nd c
ompe
tenc
e to
incr
ease
op
erat
iona
l effi
cien
cy a
nd e
ffect
ivene
ss.
•HN
E to
ens
ure
engi
neer
ing
and
tech
nica
l pe
rson
nel r
ecei
ve ta
rget
ed tr
aini
ng, c
oach
ing
and
certi
ficat
ion
that
pro
vide
them
with
co
nfide
nce
and
com
pete
nce
to d
isch
arge
to
the
limit
of th
eir d
eleg
atio
n.
•W
orkf
orce
man
agem
ent
prin
cipl
es h
ave
been
defi
ned
by H
NE.
•NE
futu
re s
tate
wor
kfor
ce
profi
le p
ublis
hed.
•Sp
ecia
lised
ski
lls
envi
ronm
ents
hav
e be
en
iden
tified
whe
re n
eces
sary
.•
HNE’
s pr
inci
ples
for e
ffect
ive
dele
gatio
n ar
e de
fined
and
ci
rcul
ated
to N
E pe
rson
nel.
•NE
per
sonn
el’s
confi
denc
e is
test
ed a
nd fo
und
to h
ave
incr
ease
d.
18 m
onth
sA:
HNE
R:
Nom
inat
ed a
utho
rised
del
egat
es.
NAVA
L EN
GINE
ERIN
G S
TRAT
EGIC
PLA
N
21
#Ob
ject
ive
Stra
tegi
esKe
y Pe
rfor
man
ce
Indi
cato
rsTi
me
Fram
esRe
spon
sibi
lity
4.2
A ca
reer
man
agem
ent f
unct
ion
that
allo
ws
pers
onne
l to
deve
lop
acro
ss th
e ca
reer
con
tinuu
m
and
ensu
res
ongo
ing
avai
labi
lity
of s
kille
d an
d ta
lent
ed p
erso
nnel
to e
xecu
te N
aval
Eng
inee
ring
func
tions
.
•HN
E to
impl
emen
t a p
roce
ss o
f suc
cess
ion
plan
ning
that
is a
dopt
ed b
y en
gine
erin
g or
gani
satio
ns to
ens
ure
ongo
ing
tech
nica
l in
tegr
ity o
f NE
spec
ialis
ts, o
pera
tors
and
re
gula
tors
. The
NE
func
tion
is o
nly
as g
ood
as
the
qual
ity o
f its
wor
kfor
ce c
ompo
nent
s (fr
om
both
a p
rofe
ssio
nal a
nd te
chni
cal a
spec
t).
•HN
E to
initi
ate
and
drive
wor
k pr
ogra
mm
e to
es
tabl
ish
a ph
ased
and
func
tiona
lly s
tream
ed
Nava
l Eng
inee
ring
work
forc
e pr
ofile
for t
he
pres
ent a
nd th
e fu
ture
.
•Su
cces
sion
pla
nnin
g is
av
aila
ble
for a
t lea
st 6
5% o
f NE
tech
nica
l pos
ition
s.•
The
NE w
orkf
orce
pro
file
is
phas
ed a
nd fu
nctio
nally
st
ream
ed.
24 m
onth
sA:
HNE
R: N
omin
ated
aut
horis
ed d
eleg
ates
4.3
Nava
l Eng
inee
ring
train
ing
and
educ
atio
n st
rate
gy
is a
ligne
d to
mee
t the
pre
sent
and
futu
re s
kill
need
s of
Def
ence
and
Indu
stry
; and
is a
ware
an
d re
spon
sive
to th
e la
test
eng
inee
ring
and
tech
nolo
gy tr
ends
.
•HN
E to
laun
ch a
nd d
rive
a wo
rk p
rogr
amm
e to
HNE
to e
nsur
e al
l tra
inin
g an
d ed
ucat
ion
prov
ided
by
engi
neer
ing
orga
nisa
tions
to th
eir
tech
nica
l per
sonn
el a
re a
ligne
d to
the
NE
stra
tegi
c di
rect
ion
and
work
forc
e st
rate
gy.
•HN
E to
lead
and
driv
e a
work
pro
gram
me
to c
ondu
ct a
sto
ck ta
ke a
nd d
evel
op a
n in
vent
ory
and
dist
ribut
ion
of fu
nctio
nal s
kills
(m
appe
d to
the
gold
-set
of N
E fu
nctio
ns)
avai
labl
e wi
thin
the
curre
nt te
chni
cal
work
forc
e ac
ross
Def
ence
and
Indu
stry
. •
NE to
iden
tify
gaps
whi
ch c
an b
e ad
dres
sed
thro
ugh
train
ing,
edu
catio
n an
d ex
perie
nce
and
impl
emen
t a b
ridgi
ng p
rogr
amm
e to
cl
ose
gaps
in th
e sk
ill p
rofil
e us
ing
the
curre
nt
work
forc
e.
•Tra
inin
g an
d Ed
ucat
ion
stra
tegy
is d
evel
oped
pr
ovid
ing
alig
nmen
t to
NE
Corp
orat
e St
rate
gy.
•Sk
ill g
ap a
naly
sis
is
com
plet
ed a
nd in
put i
nto
Train
ing
and
Educ
atio
n St
rate
gy.
12 m
onth
sA:
HNE
R: N
omin
ated
aut
horis
ed d
eleg
ates
4.4
The
Nava
l Eng
inee
ring
com
mun
ity u
nder
stan
ds
and
appr
ecia
tes
the
uniq
ue v
alue
add
ition
and
co
ntrib
utio
n th
ey m
ake
to N
avy
as p
rofe
ssio
nals
an
d di
spla
ys a
cul
ture
and
beh
avio
urs
that
up
hold
s th
eir p
rofe
ssio
nal e
thic
s an
d va
lues
.
•HN
E to
com
mun
icat
e th
e Na
val E
ngin
eerin
g Em
ploy
men
t Val
ue P
ropo
sitio
n (E
VP) t
o at
tract
, rec
ruit
and
reta
in s
uita
bly
qual
ified
an
d ex
perie
nced
per
sonn
el.
•HN
E to
mak
e av
aila
ble
appr
opria
te c
hann
els
of
com
mun
icat
ion
(e.g
., ne
wsle
tters
, gro
up e
mai
l, ph
one
lines
, int
rane
t pag
es) f
or E
ngin
eerin
g pe
rson
nel t
o sh
are
thei
r exp
erie
nce,
kno
wled
ge
and
insi
ghts
and
dev
elop
the
feel
ing
of b
eing
on
e co
mm
unity
.•
HNE
to e
nsur
e th
at th
ere
is a
dire
ct c
hann
el
of c
omm
unic
atio
n wi
th a
ll Na
val E
ngin
eerin
g pe
rson
nel o
n al
l pro
fess
iona
l eth
ics
rela
ted
mat
ters
.
•NE
EVP
has
bee
n ap
prov
ed
and
publ
ishe
d to
all
NE
pers
onne
l.•
NE C
omm
unity
is a
ble
to
inte
ract
thro
ugh
at le
ast 2
ch
anne
ls o
f com
mun
icat
ion.
•HN
E Ho
tline
est
ablis
hed.
12 m
onth
s•A/
R: H
NE
NAVA
L EN
GINE
ERIN
G ST
RATE
GIC
PLAN
22
#Ob
ject
ive
Stra
tegi
esKe
y Pe
rfor
man
ce
Indi
cato
rsTi
me
Fram
esRe
spon
sibi
lity
4.2
A ca
reer
man
agem
ent f
unct
ion
that
allo
ws
pers
onne
l to
deve
lop
acro
ss th
e ca
reer
con
tinuu
m
and
ensu
res
ongo
ing
avai
labi
lity
of s
kille
d an
d ta
lent
ed p
erso
nnel
to e
xecu
te N
aval
Eng
inee
ring
func
tions
.
•HN
E to
impl
emen
t a p
roce
ss o
f suc
cess
ion
plan
ning
that
is a
dopt
ed b
y en
gine
erin
g or
gani
satio
ns to
ens
ure
ongo
ing
tech
nica
l in
tegr
ity o
f NE
spec
ialis
ts, o
pera
tors
and
re
gula
tors
. The
NE
func
tion
is o
nly
as g
ood
as
the
qual
ity o
f its
wor
kfor
ce c
ompo
nent
s (fr
om
both
a p
rofe
ssio
nal a
nd te
chni
cal a
spec
t).
•HN
E to
initi
ate
and
drive
wor
k pr
ogra
mm
e to
es
tabl
ish
a ph
ased
and
func
tiona
lly s
tream
ed
Nava
l Eng
inee
ring
work
forc
e pr
ofile
for t
he
pres
ent a
nd th
e fu
ture
.
•Su
cces
sion
pla
nnin
g is
av
aila
ble
for a
t lea
st 6
5% o
f NE
tech
nica
l pos
ition
s.•
The
NE w
orkf
orce
pro
file
is
phas
ed a
nd fu
nctio
nally
st
ream
ed.
24 m
onth
sA:
HNE
R: N
omin
ated
aut
horis
ed d
eleg
ates
4.3
Nava
l Eng
inee
ring
train
ing
and
educ
atio
n st
rate
gy
is a
ligne
d to
mee
t the
pre
sent
and
futu
re s
kill
need
s of
Def
ence
and
Indu
stry
; and
is a
ware
an
d re
spon
sive
to th
e la
test
eng
inee
ring
and
tech
nolo
gy tr
ends
.
•HN
E to
laun
ch a
nd d
rive
a wo
rk p
rogr
amm
e to
HNE
to e
nsur
e al
l tra
inin
g an
d ed
ucat
ion
prov
ided
by
engi
neer
ing
orga
nisa
tions
to th
eir
tech
nica
l per
sonn
el a
re a
ligne
d to
the
NE
stra
tegi
c di
rect
ion
and
work
forc
e st
rate
gy.
•HN
E to
lead
and
driv
e a
work
pro
gram
me
to c
ondu
ct a
sto
ck ta
ke a
nd d
evel
op a
n in
vent
ory
and
dist
ribut
ion
of fu
nctio
nal s
kills
(m
appe
d to
the
gold
-set
of N
E fu
nctio
ns)
avai
labl
e wi
thin
the
curre
nt te
chni
cal
work
forc
e ac
ross
Def
ence
and
Indu
stry
. •
NE to
iden
tify
gaps
whi
ch c
an b
e ad
dres
sed
thro
ugh
train
ing,
edu
catio
n an
d ex
perie
nce
and
impl
emen
t a b
ridgi
ng p
rogr
amm
e to
cl
ose
gaps
in th
e sk
ill p
rofil
e us
ing
the
curre
nt
work
forc
e.
•Tra
inin
g an
d Ed
ucat
ion
stra
tegy
is d
evel
oped
pr
ovid
ing
alig
nmen
t to
NE
Corp
orat
e St
rate
gy.
•Sk
ill g
ap a
naly
sis
is
com
plet
ed a
nd in
put i
nto
Train
ing
and
Educ
atio
n St
rate
gy.
12 m
onth
sA:
HNE
R: N
omin
ated
aut
horis
ed d
eleg
ates
4.4
The
Nava
l Eng
inee
ring
com
mun
ity u
nder
stan
ds
and
appr
ecia
tes
the
uniq
ue v
alue
add
ition
and
co
ntrib
utio
n th
ey m
ake
to N
avy
as p
rofe
ssio
nals
an
d di
spla
ys a
cul
ture
and
beh
avio
urs
that
up
hold
s th
eir p
rofe
ssio
nal e
thic
s an
d va
lues
.
•HN
E to
com
mun
icat
e th
e Na
val E
ngin
eerin
g Em
ploy
men
t Val
ue P
ropo
sitio
n (E
VP) t
o at
tract
, rec
ruit
and
reta
in s
uita
bly
qual
ified
an
d ex
perie
nced
per
sonn
el.
•HN
E to
mak
e av
aila
ble
appr
opria
te c
hann
els
of
com
mun
icat
ion
(e.g
., ne
wsle
tters
, gro
up e
mai
l, ph
one
lines
, int
rane
t pag
es) f
or E
ngin
eerin
g pe
rson
nel t
o sh
are
thei
r exp
erie
nce,
kno
wled
ge
and
insi
ghts
and
dev
elop
the
feel
ing
of b
eing
on
e co
mm
unity
.•
HNE
to e
nsur
e th
at th
ere
is a
dire
ct c
hann
el
of c
omm
unic
atio
n wi
th a
ll Na
val E
ngin
eerin
g pe
rson
nel o
n al
l pro
fess
iona
l eth
ics
rela
ted
mat
ters
.
•NE
EVP
has
bee
n ap
prov
ed
and
publ
ishe
d to
all
NE
pers
onne
l.•
NE C
omm
unity
is a
ble
to
inte
ract
thro
ugh
at le
ast 2
ch
anne
ls o
f com
mun
icat
ion.
•HN
E Ho
tline
est
ablis
hed.
12 m
onth
s•A/
R: H
NE
#Ob
ject
ive
Stra
tegi
esKe
y Pe
rfor
man
ce
Indi
cato
rsTi
me
Fram
esRe
spon
sibi
lity
4.5
HNE
to e
nsur
e no
n-en
gine
ers
bene
fit fr
om w
hat
engi
neer
ing
brin
gs to
the
mar
itim
e ca
pabi
lity
and
are
ably
info
rmed
to b
alan
ce te
chni
cal
seaw
orth
ines
s re
quire
men
ts w
ith o
pera
tiona
l de
man
d.
•HN
E to
ens
ure
NE S
take
hold
er E
ngag
emen
t St
rate
gy in
clud
es c
omm
unic
atio
n to
wid
er
audi
ence
abo
ut th
e va
lue
of e
ngin
eerin
g. −Ex
plor
e an
d pu
rsue
opt
ions
to c
omm
unic
ate
with
non
-tech
nica
l aud
ienc
e th
roug
h ot
her
Navy
-wid
e fo
rum
s an
d co
mm
unic
atio
n ch
anne
ls.
• Th
e No
n-te
chni
cal w
orkf
orce
ha
s be
en m
ade
awar
e of
the
role
of N
E, a
t lea
st o
nce
a ye
ar, t
hrou
gh N
avy
wide
or
grou
p sp
ecifi
c co
mm
unic
atio
n ch
anne
l.
12 m
onth
sA/
R: H
NE
NAVA
L EN
GINE
ERIN
G S
TRAT
EGIC
PLA
N
23
Glossary of terms
CDG Capability Development Group
CN Chief of Navy
CSL Capability Systems Lifecycle
DMO Defence Material Organisation
DTS Directorate of Technical Seaworthiness
EVP Employment Value Proposition
FEG Force Element Group
HMS Head of Maritime Systems
HNE Head Navy Engineering
NCAA Naval Capability Assurance and Assessment
NE Naval Engineering
SOI Statement of Operating Intent
SPO Systems Program Office
TLEMP Through Life Engineering Management Plan
NAVA
L EN
GINE
ERIN
G ST
RATE
GIC
PLAN
24
RIZZO REFORM PROGRAM
2013 – 2017
NAVAL ENGINEERING
STRATEGIC PLAN
DP
S:J
UL0
31/1
3
