25

Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE
Page 2: Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE
Page 3: Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE

du

ou

tdo

or M

esh

-WiF

i

du

WiF

i H

ots

po

ts

du

Pre-W

iMA

X P

oin

t-to

-Po

int

& P

oin

t-to

-Mu

ltip

oin

tLin

ks t

o S

ite

Off

ices

du W

iMAX n

etw

ork

for

the D

ubai M

etr

o*

du

Fix

ed

netw

ork

Servic

es

du

UA

E N

ati

on

wid

e M

ob

ile N

etw

ork

Mo

bile B

ro

ad

ban

d

3

* W

inn

er o

f 2

00

9 m

ost

inn

ovati

ve m

ob

ilit

y p

ro

ject

by C

isco

Netw

orkers e

ven

t

Page 4: Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE

4

Page 5: Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE

5

So

urce:

QU

ALC

OM

M w

hit

e p

ap

er “

HS

PA

+ f

or E

nh

an

ced

Mo

bile B

ro

ad

ban

d”

2010

2011

2009

2012+

No

te:

Esti

mate

d c

om

mercia

l d

ate

s

DL:

28

Mb

ps

UL:

11

Mb

ps

DL:

42

Mb

ps

1

UL:

11

Mb

ps

DL:

84

Mb

ps

2

UL:

23

Mb

ps

2

DL:

1.8

-14

.4 M

bp

s

UL:

5.7

Mb

ps

2x

da

ta c

ap

ac

ity

>2

x v

oic

e c

ap

ac

ity

Bro

ad

ba

nd

do

wn

loa

ds

an

d u

plo

ad

s, Q

oS

Mu

ltic

arr

ier-

2x

da

ta r

ate

s t

o a

ll

20

MH

z

de

plo

ym

en

ts

Mu

ltic

arr

ier

en

ha

nc

em

en

ts

DL:

10

0+

Mb

ps

3

UL:

23

+ M

bp

s

1R8 w

ill re

ach 4

2 M

bps b

y c

om

bin

ing 2

x2 M

IMO

and H

OM

(64Q

AM

) in

5 M

Hz,

or

by u

tilizin

g H

OM

(64Q

AM

) and m

ultic

arr

ier

in 1

0 M

Hz.

2R9 c

om

bin

es m

ultic

arr

ier

and M

IMO

in

10 M

Hz t

o r

each 8

4 M

bps p

eak r

ate

s.

Uplink m

ultic

arr

ier

double

the u

plink peak d

ata

rate

to 2

3 M

bps.

3Rele

ases b

eyond R9 m

ay e

xpand m

ultic

arr

ier

to 2

0 M

Hz a

nd u

tilize c

om

bin

ations o

f m

ultic

arr

ier

and M

IMO

to r

each d

ata

rate

s e

xceedin

g 1

00 M

bps.

Create

d 0

6/

10

/0

9

Rel-

7

Rel-

8

Rel-

9

Beyo

nd

Rel-

9

Rel-

6

(H

SU

PA

)

Rel-

99

R

el-

5

(H

SD

PA

)

HS

PA

H

SP

A+

(H

SP

A E

vo

lved

)

WC

DM

A

Page 6: Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE

HS

DP

A S

ing

le C

arr

ier

– 5

MH

z

Du

al C

arr

ier

– 1

0M

Hz

HS

PA

+ Im

pro

ve

s P

ea

k R

ate

s w

hile

pro

vid

ing

Hig

he

r Q

oS

an

d C

us

tom

er

Lo

ya

lty

14

.4M

21

M

28

M

42

M

28

M

42

M

56

M

84

M

64

QA

M

MIM

O

64

QA

M+

MIM

O

DC

DC

+6

4Q

AM

D

C+

MIM

O

DC

+M

IMO

+6

4Q

AM

6

Page 7: Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE

Ch

oic

e d

ep

en

ds

on

av

aila

ble

fre

qu

en

cy, o

pe

rato

r’s

str

ate

gy

an

d t

erm

ina

l’s

ma

turi

ty.

Step 3

HS

DP

A 4

2 M

64

QA

M +

MIM

O

HS

DP

A 2

1M

64

QA

M

HS

DP

A 1

4.4

Op

tio

n A

O

pti

on

B

Step 1 Step 2

HS

DP

A 4

2M

64

QA

M +

MIM

O

HS

DP

A 2

8M

MIM

O

HS

DP

A 8

4M

DC

+ 6

4Q

AM

+ M

IMO

HS

DP

A 7

.2

HS

DP

A 2

1M

64

QA

M

HS

DP

A 4

2M

64

QA

M +

DC

Op

tio

n C

7

Page 8: Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE

Da

ta s

tre

am

1

Da

ta s

tre

am

2

MIM

O h

as

be

tte

r th

rou

gh

pu

t g

ain

s c

los

e t

o N

od

e-B

& c

ell c

en

tre

.

! D

ou

ble

th

rou

gh

pu

t b

y u

sin

g d

ou

ble

str

ea

ms

pe

r U

se

r

! O

nly

ne

ed

1 c

arr

ier

fre

qu

en

cy

R5

HS

DP

A

R7

MIM

O

2x

2 M

IMO

1

4.4

Mb

ps

28

.8M

bp

s

8

Page 9: Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE

An

ch

or

Ca

rrie

r F

req

uen

cy 1

Su

pp

lem

en

tary

Ca

rrie

r F

req

uen

cy 2

Du

al c

ells

co

ve

rs t

he

sa

me

g

eo

gra

ph

ical are

a

Do

wn

link p

ea

k r

ate

d

ouble

28

.8M

/42

Mb

ps

5M

Hz

5M

Hz

fre

qu

en

ce

y1

fr

eq

ue

nce

y2

f

Tw

o f

req

ue

nc

ies

are

ad

jacen

t

Us

e 2

ad

jac

en

t c

arr

iers

to

tra

ns

mit

sim

ult

an

eo

us

ly d

ata

to

th

e s

am

e u

se

r

Fu

ll u

se

of

the

tw

o c

ells

re

so

urc

e b

y J

oin

t S

ch

ed

ulin

g a

nd

Lo

ad

Ba

lan

ce

9

Page 10: Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE

Cri

teri

a/E

vo

luti

on

D

CM

IMO

Pe

ak

Ra

te

42

Mb

ps

in

10

Mh

z b

an

d

42

Mb

ps

in

5M

z b

an

d

Co

ve

rag

e P

erf

orm

an

ce

B

ett

er

--

Th

rou

gh

pu

t P

erf

orm

an

ce

--

Be

tte

r

La

ten

cy

Pe

rfo

rma

nc

e

Be

tte

r --

Se

rvic

e T

yp

e (

Fu

ll B

uff

er)

--

Be

tte

r

Se

rvic

e T

yp

e (

Bu

rst)

B

ett

er

--

CA

PE

X In

ve

stm

en

t L

ow

Hig

h

10

Page 11: Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE

No

tes:

1) P

A3

an

d m

acro

cell m

od

es a

re s

up

po

sed

. 2

) U

sers a

re u

nif

orm

ly d

istr

ibu

ted

. 2

)A

s c

an

be o

bserved

, th

e D

C g

ain

is m

ore p

ro

no

un

ced

at

low

lo

ad

(2

5%

at

2

u

sers/

secto

r) c

om

pared

to

hig

h lo

ad

(7

% a

t 1

6 u

sers/

secto

r).

3) D

C im

pro

vem

en

t co

mes f

ro

m f

req

uen

cy d

iversit

y a

nd

bett

er s

tati

sti

cal m

ult

iple

xin

g

Th

e t

hro

ug

hp

ut

ga

in o

f D

C w

ill fa

st

de

cre

as

e w

ith

th

e c

ell u

se

rs in

cre

as

ing

11

Sourc

e o

f firs

t gra

ph:

R1-0

82094,

“Text

pro

posal fo

r TR o

n s

imula

tion r

esults”

(initia

l subm

issio

n),

Qualc

om

m E

uro

pe,

3G

PP T

SG

-RAN

WG

1 #

53bis

, M

ay 2

008.

Page 12: Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE

12

Ce

ll R

ad

ius

De

ns

e U

rba

n

Urb

an

Su

bu

rb

Ru

ral

MIM

O+

64

QA

M

0.3

30

.51

.73

.9

DC

+6

4Q

AM

0

.43

0.6

32

.25

.3

Re

ma

rk:

Ce

ll e

dg

e t

hro

ug

hp

ut

10

24

kb

ps

12

Sourc

e:

du

’s P

artn

er S

imu

lati

on

Page 13: Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE

13

Page 14: Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE

! In

sta

nta

neo

us d

ow

n/

up

lin

k p

eak d

ata

rate

s o

f at

least

10

0/

50

Mb

ps w

ith

in 2

0 M

Hz a

llo

cati

on

,

resp

ecti

vely

.

! D

ow

n/

up

lin

k:

averag

e u

ser t

hro

ug

hp

ut

per M

Hz,

(3

-4)/

(2

-3) t

imes R

ele

ase 6

HS

(D

/U

)P

A,

resp

ecti

vely

.

! M

ob

ilit

y s

hall b

e m

ain

tain

ed

at

sp

eed

s 1

20

km

/h

-35

0km

/h

(o

r e

ven

up

to

50

0 k

m/

h d

ep

en

din

g o

n

th

e f

req

uen

cy b

an

d)

! S

pectr

um

fle

xib

ilit

y:

scala

ble

to

op

erate

in

1.4

, 2

.5,

5,

10

, 1

5 a

nd

20

Mh

z a

llo

cati

on

s:

Up

lin

k a

nd

do

wn

lin

k,

pair

ed

(FD

D m

od

e) a

nd

un

pair

ed

(TD

D m

od

e)

14

Sourc

e:

GSA “

Evolu

tion t

o L

TE -

an o

verv

iew

, D

ecem

ber

2009

Page 15: Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE

15

Sourc

e:

QU

ALCO

MM

white p

aper

“LTE r

ele

ase 8

and b

eyond”

2010

2011

2009

2012+

N

ote

: Esti

mate

d c

om

mercia

l d

ate

s

Leverag

es n

ew

, w

ider

an

d T

DD

sp

ectr

um

DL:

73

– 1

50

Mb

ps

3

UL:

36

– 7

5 M

bp

s3

(

10

MH

z –

20

MH

z)

DL:

28

Mb

ps

UL:

11

Mb

ps

DL:

42

Mb

ps

1

UL:

11

Mb

ps

DL:

84

Mb

ps

2

UL:

23

Mb

ps

2

(1

0 M

Hz )

DL:

1.8

-14

.4 M

bp

s

UL:

5.7

Mb

ps

2x d

ata

cap

acit

y

>2

x v

oic

e c

ap

acit

y

Bro

ad

ban

d d

ow

nlo

ad

s

an

d u

plo

ad

s,

Qo

S

Mu

ltic

arrie

r-

2x

data

rate

s t

o a

ll

20

MH

z

dep

loym

en

ts

Mu

ltic

arrie

r

en

han

cem

en

ts

DL:

10

0+

Mb

ps

3

UL:

23

+ M

bp

s

(1

0 M

Hz )

Create

d 0

8/

18

/0

9

1R

8 w

ill reach

42

Mb

ps b

y c

om

bin

ing

2x2

MIM

O a

nd

HO

M

(6

4Q

AM

) in

5M

Hz,

or b

y u

tilizin

g H

OM

(6

4Q

AM

) a

nd

mu

lti carrie

r in

10

MH

z.

2R

9 a

nd

beyo

nd

may u

tilize c

om

bin

ati

on

s o

f m

ult

i carrie

ran

d M

IM

O t

o r

each

84

Mb

ps p

eak r

ate

s.

Sim

ilarly

, u

plin

k m

ult

i carrie

r

can

do

ub

le t

he u

plin

k d

ata

rate

s.

3

Peak r

ate

s f

or 1

0 a

nd

20

MH

z F

DD

usin

g 2

x2

MIM

O,

sta

nd

ard

su

pp

orts

4x4

MIM

O e

nab

lin

g p

eak r

ate

s o

f 3

00

Mb

ps.

TD

D

rate

s a

re a

fu

ncti

on

of

up

/d

ow

nlin

k a

sym

metr

y

4P

eak r

ate

s c

an

reach

or e

xceed

30

0 M

bp

s b

y a

gg

reg

ati

ng

mu

ltip

le 2

0

MH

z c

arrie

rs a

s c

on

sid

ered

fo

r L

TE A

dvan

ced

(LTE R

el-

10

).

Mu

ltic

arrie

r >

20

MH

z

dep

loym

en

ts

DL:

30

0+

Mb

s4

UL:

15

0+

Mb

ps

4

( B

eyo

nd

20

MH

z)

Rel-

7

Rel-

8

Rel-

9

Beyo

nd

Rel-

9

Rel-

6

(H

SU

PA

)

Rel-

99

R

el-

5

(H

SD

PA

)

HS

PA

H

SP

A+

(H

SP

A E

vo

lved

)

WC

DM

A

LTE

LTE

Ad

van

ced

Rel-

10

R

el-

8

Rel-

9

Page 16: Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE

21

00

M

26

00

M

Ce

ll R

ad

ius

18

%

Fre

qu

en

cy B

an

d

Ce

ll R

ad

ius

(k

m)

LT

E 2

60

0M

hz

0.9

5

LT

E 2

10

0M

hz

1.1

6

Re

ma

rk: U

rba

n s

ce

na

rio

, ce

ll e

dg

e th

rou

gh

pu

t 2

00

0kb

ps

16

Sourc

e:

du

’s P

artn

er S

imu

lati

on

Page 17: Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE

17

Page 18: Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE

HS

PA

+

LT

E

!"#$%&'

()#*+,

(-.#$%&'

.)#/+,0.1.2,

3.45"#$%&'

.)#*+0"1"2,

!5"$%&6*+,0789:,;<=,>?@,#

A#B,

@,4"CD#2,

!54$%&6*+,0789:,;<=,.1.,#

A#B2,

(5"."6)54,0#A#

B@4"CD#2,

(5-(-6)5EE,0.1.,#

A#B2,

F1G&HIJ,

K88L,M<,9%%NO,<=,$PO,

Q<RS9=8,<=,TGI<=,/9=LS9=8,

P%J=9L8,

K8SNO,$PGNL,

UPNN,&O&M8T,$9ILSGLM/,

V9=G9$N8,P%,M<,;PNN,&O&M8T,$9ILSGLM/,

W8XPG=8&,&GJIGYZ9IM,Z<T%PHIJ,

%<S8=,LP8,M<,&GJI9N,$8GIJ,

L8YI8L,GI,M/8,HT8,L<T9GI,9IL,

<I,M<%,<;,&%=89LGIJ, ,

AL89N,;<=,#A#

B,LP8,M<,&GJI9N,

=8%=8&8IM9H<I,GI,M/8,;=8XP8IZO,L<T9GI,

9IL,%<&&G$GNGMO,<;,I9==<S$9IL,9NN<Z9H<I,

M<,;<NN<S,=89N[HT8,\9=G9H<I&,GI,M/8,

Z/9II8N,

18

Page 19: Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE

19

Sc

en

ari

o

Ce

ll R

ad

ius

in

DL

(K

m)

De

ns

e u

rba

n

Urb

an

Su

bu

rba

n

Ru

ral

HS

PA

2.1

GH

z

0.3

80

.57

2.3

44

.62

LT

E 2

.1G

Hz

0.4

90

.78

3.1

85

.33

LT

E 2

.6G

Hz

0.4

0.6

42

.58

4.6

8

DL

Ce

ll R

ad

ius

Co

mp

ari

so

n. D

L C

ell e

dg

e t

hro

ug

hp

ut

51

2k

bp

s, In

do

or

Co

ve

rag

e, 9

0%

Ce

ll L

oa

din

g

Page 20: Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE

Ce

llL

oad

ing

(%)

Ce

ll R

ad

ius

(K

m)

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

10

0%

UL

0

.80

.77

0.7

40

.71

0.6

70

.63

0.5

90

.52

0.4

30

.02

98

%

DL

0

.79

0.7

50

.71

0.6

70

.62

0.5

80

.54

0.4

90

.45

0.4

34

5%

HS

PA

+ 2

.1G

Hz,U

rba

n s

ce

na

rio

, in

do

or

co

ve

rag

e, 1

28

kb

ps

/51

2k

bp

s in

UL

/DL

Page 21: Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE

21

Ce

ll L

oa

din

g(%

)

Ce

ll R

ad

ius

(K

m)

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

10

0%

UL

0

.52

0.5

10

.50

.49

0.4

80

.47

0.4

60

.45

0.4

40

.42

19

%

DL

0

.79

0.7

70

.76

0.7

40

.72

0.7

10

.68

0.6

60

.64

0.6

12

3%

LT

E 2

.6G

Hz,U

rba

n s

ce

na

rio

, In

do

or

co

ve

rag

e, 1

28

kb

ps

/51

2K

bp

s in

UL

/DL

.

Page 22: Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE

• 

Cell R

ad

ius s

hrin

ks a

s a

fu

ncti

on

of

nu

mb

er o

f u

sers a

t cell e

dg

e

meeti

ng

th

e 5

12

Kb

ps T

hro

ug

hp

ut

 O

nly

6 u

sers c

an

ach

ieve t

he t

hro

ug

hp

ut

an

d t

he c

ell r

ad

ius s

hrin

ks t

o

20

0m

on

ly

22

Page 23: Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE

23

Sc

he

me

U

L A

ve

rag

e C

ell

Th

rou

gh

pu

t R

em

ark

HS

UP

A 1

0m

s

2.1

Mb

ps

CA

T5

,urb

an

,UL c

ell

loa

d 7

5%

HS

UP

A 2

ms

2

.3M

pb

s

CA

T6

,urb

an

,UL c

ell

loa

d 7

5%

HS

UP

A 1

6Q

AM

3

.0M

bp

s

CA

T7

,urb

an

,UL c

ell

loa

d 9

0%

LT

E 1

0M

Hz

9.7

Mp

bs

Urb

an

,2.6

GH

z

LT

E 2

0M

Hz

19

.8M

bp

s

Urb

an

,2.6

GH

z

S

ch

em

e

DL

Av

era

ge

Ce

ll

Th

rou

gh

pu

t R

em

ark

HS

PA

(16

QA

M)

6.0

Mp

bs

Urb

an

, b

an

dw

idth

5M

Hz

HS

PA

+(6

4Q

AM

) 6

.41

Mb

ps

Urb

an

,ba

nd

wid

th 5

MH

z

HS

PA

+(M

IMO

) 6

.98

Mp

bs

Urb

an

,ba

nd

wid

th 5

MH

z

HS

PA

+(M

IMO

+6

4Q

AM

) 7

.12

Mb

ps

Urb

an

,ba

nd

wid

th 5

MH

z

HS

PA

+(D

C+

16

QA

M)

6.4

3M

pb

s

Urb

an

,ba

nd

wid

th 5

MH

z

HS

PA

+(D

C+

64

QA

M)

6.8

9M

bp

s

Urb

an

,ba

nd

wid

th 5

MH

z

LT

E 1

0M

Hz

16

.92

Mp

bs

Urb

an

,2.6

GH

z

LT

E 2

0M

Hz

34

.34

Mb

ps

Urb

an

,2.6

GH

z

Page 24: Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE

24

" A

ssu

mp

tio

ns:

-

Urb

an

Scen

ario

-

HS

PA

+

1. 

Scen

ario

1:

1st carrie

r R

99

+H

SA

P(5

co

des),

2n

d c

arrie

r H

SP

A+

(1

5 c

od

es)

2. 

Scen

ario

2:

1st carrie

r H

SP

A+

(1

5 c

od

es),

2n

d c

arrie

r H

SP

A+

(1

5 c

od

es)

-

LTE b

an

dw

idth

: 1

0 &

20

MH

z

-

Traff

ic M

od

el assu

mp

tio

n:

data

user 5

0kb

ps,

vo

ice u

ser 0

.02

5Elr

-

HS

PA

+ c

an

su

pp

ort

CS

an

d P

S s

ervic

e,

LTE o

nly

su

pp

ort

PS

servic

e.

Ca

pa

cit

y/C

ell

su

bs

cri

be

rs

su

pp

ort

ed

/Ce

ll

Nu

mb

er

of

su

pp

ort

ed

sim

ult

an

eo

us

us

ers

HS

PA

2.1

GH

z

( scenario 1

)2

2E

lr(C

S A

MR

12

.2)

9.3

Mb

ps

(PS

HS

PA

+)

88

0 v

oic

e s

ub

sc

rib

er

+ 1

86

B

roa

db

an

d s

ub

sc

rib

er

10

0K

HS

PA

2.1

GH

z

( scenario 2

)

13

Mb

ps

:2 n

ati

ve

HS

PA

+ c

arr

iers

, n

o v

oic

e w

ith

DC

-HS

PA

+

26

0 B

roa

db

an

d s

ub

sc

rib

er

14

2K

LT

E 1

0M

Hz @

at

2.6

GH

z

16

.92

Mb

ps

3

38

Bro

ad

ba

nd

su

bs

cri

be

r 1

85

K

LT

E 2

0M

Hz @

2

.1G

Hz

34

.7M

bp

s

694 B

road

ban

d s

ub

scri

ber

38

0 K

LT

E 2

0 @

2

.6G

Hz

34

.3M

bp

s

68

6 B

roa

db

an

d s

ub

sc

rib

er

37

6K

Page 25: Dr Ayman Elnashar- Du- HSPA+ vs LTE

25