Upload
dinhminh
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
5/12/2014
1
CRYPTOGENIC STROKECRYPTOGENIC STROKE
Victor Barredo, M.D.,Neurologist
Baptist and South Miami Hospitals
DisclosuresI have no relevant commercial relationships to disclose.
Ischemic Artery
Occlusion (85%)
Hemorrhagic Vessel Rupture (15%)
Breakdown of Ischemic Strokes:
Atherothrombotic (25-30%)Stenotic artery feeding area of infarction
Cardioembolic (20%)A thrombus or other material dislodges from theA thrombus or other material dislodges from the heart or aortic arch
Lacunar/Small Vessel (15-20%)Small, deep infarct
Other/Uncommon (5-10%)
Cryptogenic (25-40%)Unknown cause
Adams HP Jr, Stroke. Jan 1993; 24; 35-41Data from NINCDS Stroke Data Bank: Foulkes et al. Stroke. 1988;19:547
Small vessel strokes
Generally due to metabolic disease Hypertension Hyperlipidemia Diabetes Smoking
Not due to embolic disease The arteries are microscopic, and too small to hold an
embolus Workup and treatment generally consists of
Carotid dopplers Lipids Glucose monitoring Blood pressure control Antiplatelet agents
3
5/12/2014
2
Thalamic Lacunar stroke
4
Embolic Strokes
Strokes often line up at the watershed distribution or at the cortex
May be a small shower representing a lysed clot May be in one or multiple vascular territories Multiple vascular territories is pathognomonic for
emboli or vasculitisemboli or vasculitis Infarcts tend to be larger, with more severe
symptoms and deficits Aphasia Neglect Field cuts seizures
Can cause edema and death
5
Watershed Distributions
6
5/12/2014
3
Embolic stroke
7
Why MRI Matters
• Delayed diagnosis
• Missed diagnosis
8 8
MRICT
diagnosis
• Increased risk from alternative imaging modalities
Patient presents with mild left sided weakness
• Examination shows no cortical signs, only slight Left sided weakness.• Most consistent with lacunar syndrome.
• CT at left is normal.• MRI at right shows embolic, cortical infarct.
Copyright © American Heart Association
9
5/12/2014
4
Embolic Stroke Workup
Carotid Dopplers to rule out artery to Artery Embolus Fasting Lipids Blood Sugar MRA or CTA of intracranial vessels to rule out stenosis
The SAMPRIS trial shows that intracranial angioplasty does not reduce the risk of recurrent stroke
Medical management Does give a culprit
Transesophageal Echocardiogram Rule out thrombus in the Left Atrial Appendage
Cannot be seen on 2D surface Echo PFO is of no clinical importance most of the time given
CLOSURE study.
10
Cardioembolic Stroke Causes
Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Low EF Cardiac Thrombus or “Smoke” Rare Causes: Rare Causes: Cardiac Tumor Vegetation on valve Mobile aortic arch atheroma (>3mm) Endocarditis PFO with venous source of embolism
11
The dilemma of Cryptogenic Stroke
If all tests are negative (and the patient has no history of Atrial Fibrillation) we now have a cryptogenic stroke
The patient is at high risk for a recurrent stroke and hence further disability and stroke, and hence further disability and death
The stroke obviously looks embolic in nature, but how to prove it? Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation may only be
present for a few minutes a month, but that is enough to cause a devastating stroke.
12
5/12/2014
5
Cryptogenic StrokeWhy AF Matters
AF equals 5 fold increase for stroke risk¹
Up to 90% of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PAF) episodes may be asymptomatic.²
Risk of stroke annually is equal for PAF and permanent AF ³
Detection of AF in Cryptogenic Stroke Patients changes treatment
Guidelines state change from antiplatelet to OAC4
1. Wolf PA, et al. Stroke 1991;22:983‐988 ; 2. Isreal et al, J AM Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:47‐52; 3. Page, RL, et al Circulation. 1994;89:224‐227
Hart RG, et al Coll Cardiol. 2000; 35:183‐187 4. Camm et al, European Heart Journal . 2012;
33, 2719‐2747
Importance of AF and Stroke
• AF is frequently paroxysmal and asymptomatic, making detection of AF difficult
• 25% of those with AF-associated stroke have no known prior history of AF
• Even in stroke patients with known PAF, 50-70% are in p ,sinus rhythm at time of stroke
• AF is one of the only reasons to use anticoagulation for secondary stroke prevention
• For almost all other reasons antiplatelet agents are used
• Anticoagulants have significantly high risk associated with use.
14
• 163 patients with previous ischemic stroke/TIA, no known AF, were continuous monitored via pacemaker or ICD
• NDAF > 5 minute
from AT/AF
0.8
0.9
1.089% of NDAF patients identified beyond 1 day
78% of NDAF patients identified beyond 7 days
60% of NDAF patients identified beyond 30 days
Ziegler P. et al. Stroke. 2010;41
duration were found in 28% patients.
• 73% of patients had newly detected AT/AF on <10% of follow-up days
Time from Device Implant (months)
0 3 mo. 6 mo. 9 mo. 12 mo.
Freedom f
0.5
0.6
0.7
Number at Risk:
163 127 111 106 67
5/12/2014
6
AT/AF burden >5.5 hours on any of 30 prior days appeared to double thromboembolic (TE) risk2
“35% of all strokes and systemic emboli were preceded by device detected atrial tachyarrhythmia's”2
1. Glotzer T. et al. The TRENDS Study Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2009.
2. http://m.theheart.org/article/1153461.do
16
Clinical Impact of NDAF in Stroke Patients
Risk of stroke recurrence is 4 times greater among prior stroke patients with NDAF (15.5%) compared to those with either known AF or no AF (3.9%).
Emphasizes the need for timely detection of AF
17
p<0.0001
Kamel et al. J Stroke Cerebrolvasc Dis ;2009 Nov‐Dec; 18(6):453‐7
Ziegler PaperTopic: Intermittent and symptom-based monitoring
• Data from 574 AT500 IPG
patients were analyzed
retrospectively over 1 year,
with intermittent monitoring
simulated by analyzing data
from randomly selected
days
1. Ziegler P. Comparison of continuous versus intermittent monitoring of atrial arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm 2006;3:1445–1452).
days
• “Intermittent and
symptom-based
monitoring is highly
inaccurate for identifying
patients with any or long-
duration AT/AF and for
assessing AT/AF burden.”
Example: Quarterly Holter recording detects AF in
54% of the patients with AF, and is correct 29% of
the time in ruling out AF in patients. 18
5/12/2014
7
How AF is Detected in Cryptogenic Stroke PatientsThe more you look, the more AF you find
20%
30%
•N = 1491
•Acute stroke or TIA and
no history of AF
•ECG monitoring in
Incremental % AF Detection
Acute Workup
After CS Diagnosis
a
0%
10%
2.7%4.1% 5.0% 5.7%
Hospital
•24‐hour Holter
recording if normal ECG
•7‐day event monitor if
normal Holter
Cotter / Ritter Data
1. Jabaudon D. Et al. Usefulness of Ambulatory 7‐Day ECG Monitoring for the Detection of Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter After Acute Stroke and Transient Ischemic Attack Stroke 2004;35:1647‐1651.2. Cotter, P.E., et al., Incidence of atrial fibrillation detected by implantable loop recorders in unexplained stroke. Neurology, 2013 Apr 23;80(17):1546‐503. Ritter, M.A., et al., Occult Atrial Fibrillation in Cryptogenic Stroke: Detection by 7‐Day Electrocardiogram Versus Implantable Cardiac Monitors. Stroke, 2013 May;44(5):1449‐52.
SURPRISE Study Updated Results
Methods: 85 patients with cryptogenic stroke/TIA and no AF on 24‐hour telemetry
were implanted with Reveal XT All patients had a minimum of 6 months of monitoring
Results 14 of 85 (16.5%) of patients diagnosed with AF
Median time from stroke onset to first recorded event ‐ 98 days Average AF burden was 2 hours per day monitored CHADS2Vasc in AF group was 4.14 vs. 3.24 in no AF (p=0.03)
Christensen LM. et al. Paroxystic Atrial Fibrillation (PAF) in Patients with minor ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. 2013 EuroStroke
Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation detected by Implantable Loop Recorders in Unexplained Stroke
Methods: 51 patients with cryptogenic stroke
implanted Patient workup included vascular &
cardiac imaging, at least 24 hours of cardiac rhythm monitoring
l
21
Results: AF was identified in 25.5% (13)
patients Median time to AF detection after
implant was 48 days Median duration of first detected AF
episode was 6 minutes AF was associate with increasing age (p
= 0.018), interarterial conduction block (p = 0.02), left atrial volume (p = 0.025) and the occurrence of atrial premature contractions on preceding external monitoring (p = 0.004)
Clinical action (OAC) was taken on all patients where AF was detected
Cotter et al, Neurology, 2013; 80 (14)
5/12/2014
8
Occult Atrial Fibrillation in Cryptogenic StrokeDetection by 7‐day ECG vs. ICM
Methods: 60 patients with cryptogenic stroke implanted Compared ICM to 7-day Holter monitor• Patient workup included Cerebral imagining, ECG,
72 hour telemetry, 24-hour Holter, TEE
Results: AF was identified in 17% (10) patients Average time to detection 64 days post-stroke Yield of ICM (17%) vs. 7-day ECG
(1.7%) significantly higher p=0.0077
Ritter et al, Stroke, 2013; Volume 44, Issue 5
22
Insertable Cardiac Event Recorder in Detection of AtrialFibrillation After Cryptogenic Stroke: An Audit Report
Etgen et al., 2013
MethodsPatient work‐up included MRI, 12‐lead ECG, 24‐72 hr. bedside telemetry, 24‐hr Holter, TEE, computed tomography/MRI angiography
22 patients with cryptogenic stroke and eligible for oral anticoagulation were implanted with Reveal XT
AF defined as episode ≥ 6 minutes
ResultsAF detected in 27.3% (6) patientsAverage time to detection post‐stroke was 161 days
Etgen et al, Insertable Cardiac Event Recorder in Detection of Atrial Fibrillation After Cryptogenic Stroke: An Audit Report. Stroke. 2013;44:2007‐2009
Patient Pathway for Acute Stroke
24
5/12/2014
9
Patient Pathway for Acute Stroke
25
ReimbursementCryptogenic Stroke – Appropriate Diagnosis Coding
“Cryptogenic stroke” usually refers to strokes with no clearly definable cause even after extensive workup.
Although atrial fibrillation (AF) may be suspected in these patients, it can’t be assigned as a diagnosis code until the diagnosis is established.
Diagnosis coding for cardiac monitoring insertion depends on the circumstances:
Inpatient (during the same admission as the acute stroke)
The acute stroke is the principal diagnosis code
Outpatient (after discharge from the acute stroke admission)
If a specific symptom or sign is present that necessitated the device insertion test/procedure, that should be used as the principal diagnosis code; however, these patients are usually asymptomatic
If the patient has residuals from the stroke, a code from category 438.XX (late effects of cerebrovascular disease) is appropriate as the principal diagnosis code
If the patient has no residuals from the stroke, code V12.54 (personal history of stroke or TIA w/o residual deficits) is appropriate as the principal diagnosis
Code V12.54 can also be used as secondary diagnosis codes if a specific symptom or sign is coded as the principal diagnosis
2013 coding analysis & recommendations provided by Clarity Coding; www.claritycoding.com
ICMs are UnderutilizedICMs are recommended by clinical guidelines; yet significantly underutilized
Up to 3 in 4 patients who met appropriate criteria
for ICM implantation
did not receive one1
5/12/2014
10
Cardiac Diagnostics Landscape
24-Hour Holter
2.5 Million
Event Recorder
1.5 Million
14-30 Day “MCOT”
250,000
Insertable Cardiac Monitor
25,000
Source: Frost & Sullivan report: North American Cardiac Monitoring and Diagnostic Services Markets
Symptoms and Intermittent MonitoringThe Tip of the AF Iceberg
Symptoms/Intermittent monitoring
Continuous monitoring
29
Conclusion
Embolic strokes have a specific appearance on a diagnostic MRI
With no known hx of AF, the workup is usually negative, leaving us with a diagnosis of cryptogenic strokediagnosis of cryptogenic stroke
The yield of diagnosing AF in these patients can be quite high if proper protocol is followed
An enthusiastic and cooperative partnership between a neurologist and cardiologist is imperative
30
5/12/2014
11
ThankThank YouYou
Thank you
31
Baptist Children’s HospitalBaptist Hospital Doctors Hospital
Baptist Cardiac &Vascular Institute
Homestead Hospital Mariners Hospital
West KendallBaptist Hospital
Baptist Outpatient Services
South Miami Hospital
32