DR. BRENNER INGENIEURGESELLSCHAFT MBH 1 Consulting Engineers for Transport and Traffic Consulting – Planning – Design – Engineering – Research - Coordination

DR. BRENNERINGENIEURGESELLSCHAFT MBH

1

Consulting Engineers for Transport and Traffic Consulting – Planning – Design – Engineering – Research - Coordination

TRANSPORT AND TRAFFIC

MASTER PLANNING

IN FAST GROWING CITIES

Dr.-Ing. Manfred F. BrennerManaging Director

Contact:[email protected]

2

DR. BRENNER INGENIEURGESELLSCHAFT MBH

PC-005..\ankara\2011\Ankara01.ppt

The current growth of cities in fast-developing countries is unique in human history, concerning scale and speed.

To maintain mobility will be one of the essential challenges of urban planning in the future.

3



"urban quality"

has become one of the most decisive criteria for attracting high-tech industries, investors, residents and tourists.

intact, safe and healthy urban environment, good infrastructure, high-class cultural scene and educational institutions, attractive urban spaces with high amenity values, etc.

sustainability of the urban development

4



• is the superior strategic guideline, placed over all sectoral planning

• is not a feasibility study or a preliminary design

• based on a "vision" of the city

• ensures liability

• has a comprehensive view and considers interdependences and interactions

The Status of the Transport and Traffic Master Plan

5



• open-minded incorporation of the complete spectrum of planningoptions, oriented on premises

• intermodal referring to all traffic modes (individual traffic, publictransport, bicycle and pedestrian traffic)

• integrative addressing all fields affected by traffic, coordinationwith land use /urban planning

• efficiency-based all planning decisions made on a quantitative basisby use of advanced traffic models

• communicative continuous information, involvement of all protagonistsand the public

Essential Demands on Urban Transport Master Planning

6



Subdivision of the project execution into 4 project stages in order to

use caesurae between phases to

- review and evaluate interim results

- determine and fix necessary planning tasks and scope of followingphases and avoid unnecessary time input and costs

- ensure target-oriented project execution

- provide transparency and understanding of the planning process

Structuring of the Planning Process

7



Planning Structure and Process

Coordination Meetings Project ManagementActive Participation of Project Partners

Workshop Presentations

field investigations of roads and junctions

parking traffic survey

analysis of existing public transport system

review of existing traffic dataplans and studies

collection of socio-economic,land use and further relevant

data

traffic data collection

road-side interviewssurveys

household travelsurveys

automatic and manual traffic counts

status quo analysis“vision” of the future

development

STAGE 1

Traffic Data Base----

Analysis of the Status Quo---

Planning Targets

environmental impact analysis

understanding of thecity's identity

analysis of non-motorizedtraffic

8




Workshop Presentations Filtering of planning scenarios

heavy duty and freight transport

parking trafficsupply and management

bicycle and pedestrianinfrastructure information technology and

control systems (ITS/UTC)

public transport network and infrastructure

definition of alternativeplanning scenarios

STAGE 2

Planning Policy Development

---Development of

Planning Scenariosroad safety strategies

urban road network

environmental impactassessment (EIA)

coordination with land use planning

planning policycontrol mechanisms

betweenagencies

Planning Structure and Process

9



comprehensive analysis of planning scenarios


Workshop Presentations Staff training

analysis of land use andsocio-economic data

calibration and validationof the models

prognosis of future traffic development

development of the traffic demand and assignment models

model application on selected

planning scenarios

STAGE 3

Development of transport models

---Analysis of alternative

planning scenarios

prognosis of futureparking space demands

analysis of economic data

economic evaluation

Structure of the TMP - Key Components

training coursesfor Client´s staff

10



Public TransportConcept 2020Haidian District

Passenger LoadsMorning Peak Traffic 2020

HCBS3

M10

M1

M11

M6

Comprehensive Transport MasterplanHAIDIAN DISTRICTBeijing / P.R. China

11



STAGE 3

TRAFFIC MODELS

3. Microscopic Traffic Simulation Model

Task:

- detailed analysis of traffic

operation based on single-

vehicle simulation

- optimization of design and control solutions

- visualisations forpresentations in

councils and public

future conditions in the city center of Potsdam after rebuilding historical monuments

12



New design of the station area in Berlin-Schöneweide

13



Structure of the TMP - Key Components


Workshop Final presentation

ranking of scenarios

scheme implementationstrategy

phased realization plan

packages of measures

integration of policymeasures

STAGE 4Transport Implementation

Plan (TIP)

preparation of the TIPpresentation of the

Transport Masterplan

cost estimation

identification of therealization scenario

14



Current Situation fast-growing Cities in Turkey

What are the major influencing criteria on the future mobility development ? ----------------------------------------- age distribution of the local population- availability of private cars- mobility indices, particularly of female population- modal choice

overload of the urban primary street network(partly in bad physical condition)

insufficient urban secondary street network

lack of efficient public transport systems

frequently unfavorable land use concepts

15



Bursa Hane yapısına göre nüfusunCinsiyeti ve yaşi

BursaAge Distribution of

Population

femalemale

16



BursaAvailability ofMotor Vehicles(% of households)

Istanbul 2007: 0 cars 65 % of households

1 car 31 % of households

2+ cars 5 % of households36 %

Vehicle TypeBursa

total

Districts

17



BursaMotorization Rate

Istanbul (2006): 144 cars/1000 inhabitants

motorization rate

[ cars/1000 inhabitants]

Bursatotal

Districts

18



München 418 Pkw/1.000 Einwohner

Düsseldorf 394 Pkw/1.000 Einwohner

Stuttgart 400 Pkw/1.000 Einwohner

Hamburg 370 Pkw/1.000 Einwohner

Motorization Rate (2006)in German Large Cities

[ cars/1000 inhabitants]

19



BursaMobility ofHousehold Population

DistrictBursatotal

average trips/all persons

average trips/mobile persons

average tripsmale - mobile

average tripsfemale - mobile

share of mobilepersons

malefemale

share of unmobilepersons

share of tripsby male

share of tripsby female

20



DistrictBursatotal

average trips/all persons

average tripsall / male

average tripsall / female

BursaMobility Indicesacc. to gender(all interviewed persons)

German Cities 2,7 to3,3

Istanbul 1,8

21



33,5%

7,7%5,3%Bus

12,2%Tram

0,5%Railway

1,7%2,5%

36,3%

40,5 %private motorized

mobility

41,2 %non-motorized

mobility

18,0 %public transport

By Foot

Bicycle

Bus

Tram

Railway

Taxi

Motorcycle

Car

Pieton

Bicicletă

Aotobuz

Tramvai

Tren

Taxi

Motocicletă

Autoturism

Modal split in the city of Arad (Romania)

22



Modal Split - Städtevergleich Modal SplitComparison of Cities

City Population Walking BicyclePublic

Transportprivate car

year ofsurvey

23



Modal Split - Metropolitan Municipality of Bursa

43,5 %non-motorized

mobility

41,0 %public transport

(all modes)

15,5 %private motorized

mobility

24



Cinsiyet ve Yaş gruplarıModal Split dağılımları

BursaModal Split depending

on gender and age

Car

Motorbike

Taxi

Minibus

Company Shuttle

Bus

LRT

Bicycle

Walking

Dolmuş

25



City of Wuhan

Status Quo

Mobility volume 2004: 8.570.000 Trips

Scenario 1


passenger cars/

public transport

taxi

bicycles

pedestrians

11

22

6

28

33

942.700 Trips

1.885.400 Trips

514.200 Trips

2.228.200 Trips

2.828.100 Trips

20

40

5

21

14

3.310.000

6.620.000

827.500

3.475.500

2.317.000

+ 251 %

+ 251 %+ 60 %

+ 56 %

- 18 %

small buses

26



City of Wuhan

Status Quo


Scenario 2


11

22

6

28

33

11

60

5

13

11

1.820.500

9.930.000

827.500

2.151.500

1.820.500

+ 60 %

- 6 %

- 36 %

+ 93 %

+ 426 %

passenger cars/

public transport

taxi

bicycles

pedestrians

small buses942.700 Trips

1.885.400 Trips

514.200 Trips

2.228.200 Trips

2.828.100 Trips

27



An efficient and attractive public transport system is the only reasonable answer to growing private car volumes

28



THE ART OF TRANSPORT AND TRAFFIC PLANNING

IS

TO FIND THE SOLUTION

THAT

KEEPS THE RIGHT BALANCE

BETWEEN

COMPETING DEMANDS

Thank youfor your kind attention !

Contact:[email protected]

29

Consulting Engineers for Transport and Traffic Consulting – Planning – Design – Engineering – Research - Coordination

DR. BRENNERINGENIEURGESELLSCHAFT MBH

Documents

DR. BRENNER INGENIEURGESELLSCHAFT MBH 1 Consulting Engineers for Transport and Traffic Consulting – Planning – Design – Engineering – Research - Coordination