69
Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

Dr David MitchellUniversity of Canterbury

New Zealand

2014

1

1

Page 2: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

What are evidence-based teaching strategies?

“clearly specified teaching strategies that have been shown in controlled research to be effective in bringing about desired outcomes in a delineated population of learners.”

2

2

Page 3: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

3

Page 4: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

What do we mean by evidence?1. Treatment fidelity2. Behavioural outcomes are clearly described3. Learner characteristics are clearly described4. Variables are controlled5. Freedom from contamination6. Acceptable side effects7. Sound theory underlying the intervention8. Adequate follow-up9. Research has been carried out in natural

conditions10.Published results have been reviewed by peers11.Research has been replicated12.Intervention is cost effective13.Research is accessible

4

4

Page 5: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

What do we mean by evidence?Meta-analyses-synthesise results from a range of similar

studies

Effect size**** Convincing: 0.7 or greater:

percentile scores increase from 50 to 76+, for example

*** Good: 0.31-0.69percentile scores increase from 50 to 62-75

* Modest: 0.2-0.3percentile scores increase from 50 to 58-61

5

5

Page 6: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

What do we mean by evidence?Effect size = 0.7

6

6

50%ile 76%ile

Page 7: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

7

7

Strategy Rating

✔Cooperative group teaching ****

Page 8: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

1. Co-operative Group Teaching‘Help learners to learn from each other’

Learners work together in small groups, helping each other to carry out individual and group tasks.

8

8

Page 9: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

1. Co-operative Group Teaching‘Help learners to learn from each other’

Learners work together in small groups, helping each other to carry out individual and group tasks.

Two types of groups* Mutual assistance groups* Cooperative groups (jig-saw puzzle)

9

9

Page 10: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

1. Co-operative Group Teaching‘Help learners to learn from each other’

Learners work together in small groups, helping each other to carry out individual and group tasks.

Two types of groups* Mutual assistance groups•Cooperative groups (jig-saw puzzle)

What are the teacher’s roles in cooperative group teaching?* Design appropriate group tasks* Teach group process skills* Deal with problems

10

10

Page 11: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

1. Co-operative Group Teaching‘Help learners to learn from each other’

Learners work together in small groups, helping each other to carry out individual and group tasks.

Two types of groups* Mutual assistance groups•Cooperative groups (jig-saw puzzle)

What are the teacher’s roles in cooperative group teaching?* Design appropriate group tasks* Teach group process skills•Deal with problems

Ability vs mixed ability groups11

11

Page 12: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

1. Co-operative Group TeachingThe evidence

Hattie: Effect size for all learners: 0.591987 US study:

- elementary school- students with learning disabilities- 22 3rd and 4th grade classes: * 9 used Cooperative Reading and Composition in heterogeneous groups * 13 controls- Students in Cooperative classes did best on reading & writing 12

12

Page 13: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

13

13

Strategy Rating

✔Cooperative group teaching ****

✔Peer tutoring ****

Page 14: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

2. Peer Tutoring‘utilise peers to teach each other’

One learner (a ‘tutor) assists another learner (a ‘tutee’) with a task.

14

14

Page 15: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

2. Peer Tutoring‘utilise peers to teach each other’

One learner (a ‘tutor) assists another learner (a ‘tutee’) with a task.

Who benefits from peer tutoring?

15

15

Page 16: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

2. Peer Tutoring‘utilise peers to teach each other’

One learner (a ‘tutor) assists another learner (a ‘tutee’) with a task.

Who benefits from peer tutoring?

How does peer tutoring work?

16

16

Page 17: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

2. Peer Tutoring‘utilise peers to teach each other’

One learner (a ‘tutor) assists another learner (a ‘tutee’) with a task.

Who benefits from peer tutoring?

How does peer tutoring work?

How can we reduce any risks of peer tutoring?

17

17

Page 18: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

2. Peer TutoringThe evidence

Hattie: Effect size for all learners: 0.55

New Zealand study: * 11-year-olds tutored 6-year-olds* 10 weeks: 4 20-minute sessions per week* Responsive feedback emphasised* Both tutees and tutors made gains in writing rate and accuracy

18

18

Page 19: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

19

19

Strategy Rating

✔1.Cooperative group teaching ****

✔2.Peer tutoring ****

✔3.Parent involvement & support

****

Page 20: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

3. Parent Involvement & Support

‘respect parents’ rights, skills and needs’

Parents play a very important role in educating and supporting learners with special needs.

20

20

Page 21: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

3. Parent Involvement & Support

‘respect parents’ rights, skills and needs’

Parents play a very important role in educating and supporting learners with special needs.

They should be involved in developing individual education programs and have a major say in their children’s placement.

21

21

Page 22: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

3. Parent Involvement & Support

‘respect parents’ rights, skills and needs’

Parents play a very important role in educating and supporting learners with special needs.

They should be involved in developing individual education programs and have a major say in their children’s placement.

Some will need counselling. 22

22

Page 23: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

3. Parent Involvement & SupportThe evidence

Hattie: parents’ expectations: Effect size 0.80Incredible Years programme: a New Zealand study:- 214 parents- at least 9 sessions, videotape modelling + discussion - significant improvements in children’s behaviour (effect sizes 0.50-0.77)- both Maori and non-Maori parents satisfied

23

23

Page 24: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

24

24

Strategy Rating

✔1. Cooperative group teaching ****

✔2. Peer tutoring ****

✔3.Parent involvement & support

****

✔4. Cognitive strategy instruction

***1/2

Page 25: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

4. Cognitive Strategy Instruction‘teach learners ways of thinking’

Help children how to learn, as well as what to learn.

25

25

Page 26: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

4. Cognitive Strategy Instruction‘teach learners ways of thinking’

Help children how to learn, as well as what to learn.

Teach such skills as:- visualizing- planning- self-regulation- remembering- analyzing- predicting- thinking about their thinking

26

26

Page 27: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

4. Cognitive Strategy Instruction‘teach learners ways of thinking’

Help children how to learn, as well as what to learn.

Teach such skills as:- visualizing- planning- self-regulation- remembering- analyzing- predicting- thinking about their thinking

General strategy instruction: think ahead, think during, think back

27

27

Page 28: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

4. Cognitive Strategy Instruction‘teach learners ways of thinking’

Help children how to learn, as well as what to learn.

Teach such skills as:- visualizing- planning- self-regulation- remembering- analyzing- predicting- thinking about their thinking

General strategy instruction: think ahead, think during, think back

Specific strategy instruction, e.g., story-writing: W W W What=2, How=2 28

28

Page 29: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

4. Cognitive Strategy InstructionThe evidence

Hattie: Teaching metacognition: Effect size = 0.69

US review of several studies of teaching mathematics to middle and secondary school students with learning disabilities:

- - Students taught to READ, PARAPHRASE, VISUALIZE, HYPOTHESIZE, ESTIMATE, COMPUTE AND CHECK

- -Results: students improved mathematical problem-solving

29

29

Page 30: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

What do we mean by evidence?Effect size = 0.7

30

30

50%ile 76%ile

Page 31: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

31

31

Strategy Rating

✔1. Cooperative group teaching ****

✔2. Peer tutoring ****

✔3. Parent involvement and support

****

✔4. Cognitive strategy instruction

***1/2

✔5. Memory strategies ****

Page 32: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

5. Memory Strategies‘help learners remember important

information’

32

32

Page 33: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

5. Memory Strategies‘help learners remember important

information’

Teach short-term and long-term memory strategies

33

33

Page 34: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

5. Memory Strategies‘help learners remember important information’

Teach short-term and long-term memory strategies

Some methods:- key facts in primary memory- mnemonics- attending to important features of a task- rehearsal- mental representations- chunking

34

34

Page 35: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

5. Memory StrategiesThe evidence

Mnemonics:e.g. a recent meta-analysis on using

mnemonics with learners with mild disabilities: effect size = 1-38

35

35

Page 36: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

36

36

Strategy Rating

✔1. Cooperative group teaching ****

✔2. Peer tutoring ****

✔3. Parent involvement and support

****

✔4. Cognitive strategy instruction

***1/2

✔5. Memory strategies ****

✔6. Review and practice ****

Page 37: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

6. Review and Practice‘practice makes perfect’

37

37

Page 38: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

6. Review and Practice‘practice makes perfect’

Three key ideas:provide opportunities to engage with the same idea at different times

38

38

Page 39: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

6. Review and Practice‘practice makes perfect’

Three key ideas:provide opportunities to engage with the same idea at different times

provide opportunities to practice new skills in different contexts

39

39

Page 40: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

6. Review and Practice‘practice makes perfect’

Three key ideas:provide opportunities to engage with the same idea at different times

provide opportunities to practice new skills in different contexts

give appropriate homework

40

40

Page 41: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

6. Review and PracticeThe evidence

Hattie: spaced practice: Effect size = 0.71A 2001 meta-analysis of 93 studies of

adolescents with learning disabilities: - explicit practice the single most important

strategy

41

41

Page 42: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

42

42

Strategy Rating

✔7. Behavioural approaches ****

Page 43: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

7. Behavioural Approaches‘control antecedents and consequences to change

behaviors’

43

43

Page 44: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

7. Behavioural Approaches‘control antecedents and consequences to change

behaviors’

Focus on events that occur before or after children do something.

44

44

Page 45: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

7. Behavioural Approaches‘control antecedents and consequences to change

behaviors’

Focus on events that occur before or after children do something.

Positive reinforcement is most important.

45

45

Page 46: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

7. Behavioural Approaches‘control antecedents and consequences to change

behaviors’

Focus on events that occur before or after children do something.

Positive reinforcement is most important.Functional behavioral assessment:- Analyse what purposes are served by

undesirable behaviours- Design an appropriate behavioural

intervention programme to replace undesirable behaviours with more acceptable ones and extinguish undesirable behaviours. 46

46

Page 47: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

7. Behavioural ApproachesThe evidence

Comprehensive review of meta-analyses involving 20 strategies:

- Behaviour modification placed third: - Social outcomes: Effect size = 0.69- Academic outcomes: Effect size = 1.57

47

47

Page 48: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

48

48

Strategy Rating

✔6. Review and practice ****

✔7. Behavioural approaches ****

✔8. Formative assessment & feedback

****

Page 49: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

8. Formative Assessment and Feedback

‘regularly check and inform learners of their progress’

Probe for knowledge and understanding within lessons

49

49

Page 50: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

8. Formative Assessment and Feedback

‘regularly check and inform learners of their progress’

Probe for knowledge and understanding within lessons

Adjust teaching methods

50

50

Page 51: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

8. Formative Assessment and Feedback

‘regularly check and inform learners of their progress’

Probe for knowledge and understanding within lessons

Adjust teaching methods

Feedback should be:- timely- explicit- focused on learner’s strategies- able to be used by the learner 51

51

Page 52: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

8. Formative Assessment and Feedback

The evidenceHattie: formative evaluation: Effect size = 0.90

feedback: Effect size = 0.73

52

52

Page 53: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

53

53

Strategy Rating

✔6. Review and practice ****✔7. Behavioural approaches

****

✔8. Formative assessment & feedback

✔9. Optimal physical environment

****

****

Page 54: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

9. Optimal Physical Environment

‘provide a physical environment that enables learning’

54

54

Page 55: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

9. Optimal Physical Environment

‘provide a physical environment that enables learning’

Pay attention to * the design and arrangement of furniture

55

55

Page 56: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

9. Optimal Physical Environment

‘provide a physical environment that enables learning’

Pay attention to * the design and arrangement of furniture * acoustics

56

56

Page 57: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

9. Optimal Physical Environment

‘provide a physical environment that enables learning’

Pay attention to * the design and arrangement of furniture * acoustics * lighting

57

57

Page 58: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

9. Optimal Physical Environment

‘provide a physical environment that enables learning’

Pay attention to * the design and arrangement of furniture * acoustics * lighting* temperature

58

58

Page 59: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

9. Optimal Physical Environment

‘provide a physical environment that enables learning’

Pay attention to * the design and arrangement of furniture * acoustics * lighting* temperature* ventilation

59

59

Page 60: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

9. Optimal Physical EnvironmentThe evidence

* New York study: students in over-crowded schools scored lower in maths and reading

* Swedish study: air cleaning reduced absenteeism from 8.3% to 3.7%

* New Zealand study: sound field amplification system improved children with Down syndrome’ perception of speech

US study of a school located next to train track

60

60

Page 61: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

61

61

Strategy Rating

✔6. Review and practice ****✔7. Behavioural approaches

****

✔8. Formative assessment & feedback

✔9. Optimal physical environment

✔ 10. Classroom climate

****

****

***

Page 62: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

10. Classroom Climate‘create a positive, motivating classroom

climate’

62

62

Page 63: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

10. Classroom Climate‘create a positive, motivating classroom

climate’

Aim for high levels of student engagement

63

63

Page 64: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

10. Classroom Climate‘create a positive, motivating classroom

climate’

Aim for high levels of student engagement

Create an emotionally safe environment that children can trust

64

64

Page 65: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

10. Classroom Climate‘create a positive, motivating classroom

climate’

Aim for high levels of student engagement

Create an emotionally safe environment that children can trust

Help learners set appropriate goals

65

65

Page 66: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

10. Classroom Climate‘create a positive, motivating classroom

climate’

Aim for high levels of student engagement

Create an emotionally safe environment that children can trust

Help learners set appropriate goals

Provide a motivating learning environment

Establish clear rules and boundaries 66

66

Page 67: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

10. Classroom ClimateThe evidence

Dutch review of 99 studies of affective teacher-student relationships (ATSRs):

- * ATSRs had medium to large influence on student engagement and small to medium influence on student achievement

- * ATSRs more important for at-risk students and those with learning difficulties

67

67

Page 68: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

.

68

68

Criterion Indicators EvaluationThe teacher regularly uses co-operative group teaching in which all learners work together in small groups of 6-8, helping each other to carry out individual and group tasks. Groups are usually mixed ability. The teacher teaches group process skills and carefully supervises group interaction.

1.In most lessons the teacher uses co-operative group activities.

2.The teacher uses a combination of (a) mutual assistance groups and (b) ‘jig-saw type groups.

3.Mostly, groups are comprised of learners with mixed abilities.

4.The teacher teaches group process skills and carefully supervises group activities.

A.All indicators are regularly met.

B.The teacher occasionally uses both forms of co-operative group activities with ability and mixed ability groups.

C.The teacher occasionally uses mutual assistance groups.

D.None of the indicators are met.

Page 69: Dr David Mitchell University of Canterbury New Zealand 2014 1 1

Reference

Mitchell, D. (2014). What really works in special and inclusive education: Using evidence-based teaching strategies. Second edition. Abingdon Oxon: Routledge.

69

69