Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
SERDP Funding Opportunities
Dr. Jeffrey MarquseeSERDP Executive Director
2
2
DoD’s Environmental Technology Programs
Science and Technology Demonstration/ Validation
3
3
Strategic EnvironmentalResearch & Development Program (SERDP)
● Established by Congress in FY 1991DoD, DOE, and EPA partnership
● SERDP is a requirements driven program that:Identifies high‐priority environmental science and technology investment opportunities that address DoD requirements- Advanced technology development to address near term needs- Fundamental research to impact real world environmental management
4
4
Environmental Technology Development Process
SERDP ESTCPService
Requirements
Basic/AppliedResearch
Implementation
AdvancedDevelopment
Demonstration/Validation
DUSD(I&E) DDR&E DUSD(I&E)
REGULATORY COOPERATION
5
5
Environmental DriversSustainability of Ranges, Facilities, and Operations
Maritime SustainabilityThreatened and Endangered Species
Toxic Air Emissions and Dust
Urban Growth &Encroachment
NoiseUXO & Munitions Constituents
Climate Change
6
6
Environmental DriversReduction of Current and Future Liability
Contamination from Past Practices Pollution Prevention to ControlLife Cycle Costs
• Groundwater, Soils and Sediments
• Large UXO Liability
• Emerging Contaminants
• Elimination of Pollutants and Hazardous Materials in Manufacturing Maintenance & Operations
• Achieve Compliance Through Pollution Prevention
7
7
Focus Area Management Structure
Weapons Systems& Platforms Munitions
Management
EnvironmentalRestoration
Sustainable Infrastructure
8
8
SERDP Funding
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13
= Congressional Adds
$ M
9
9
SERDP Solicitations
● CORE Statements of Need: 16 SONsMultiple awards per SONMulti‐year Proposals & Limited Scope ProposalsBroad Agency Announcement (BAA)
- Universities, Industry and non‐governmental organizations- Pre‐proposal required
Federal Call- Fixed number of multi‐year proposal per agency- No restriction on limited scope proposals
● SEED Statements of Need: 3 SEED SONs$150K or less and approximately 1 yearSeeks innovative high risk and high payoff workBAA and Federal Call
10
10
Core Solicitation Process
Federal Call
BAA Call
CoreSONs
Pre‐proposal
Full Proposal
Peer Review
STC Review and Program Development
SAB Approval
Staff Review
Full Proposal
Private Sector BAA
Federal Sector
SERDP Selection
11
11
Core Solicitation Dates
● Broad Agency AnnouncementPre‐proposals due: 4 PM January 7, 2010- Full Proposal requested by: February 4, 2010
Full proposals due: 4 PM March 11, 2010
● Call to Federal AgenciesFull Proposals due: 4 PM March 11, 2010- Check with agency’s POC to determine internal due dates
● Proposers notified July 2010● SAB Presentation (if required) Sept. or Oct. 2010
Visit the SEDRP web site for Detailswww.serdp.org/funding
12
12
FY10 Core Solicitation Success Statistics
23%NIH* (R01 equiv.)
20%‐Engineering20%‐Environmental
Biology31%‐Geosciences
25%‐NSF* (overall)
18%‐NIEHS* 27%‐SERDP All20%‐SERDP Federal33%13%SERDP BAA
Full Proposal to SABPre‐proposal to SAB
* Award percentages in 2008
13
13
SEED Solicitation Process
BAA Call
Full Proposal
SEEDSONs
Federal Call
Full Proposal
Federal Sector
Staff Review
STC Review and Program Development
SERDP Selection
Private Sector BAA
14
14
SEED Solicitation Dates
● SERDP SEED SolicitationProposals due by: 4 PM March 11, 2010- Government, Universities, Industry and NGO
● Proposers notified July 2010
Visit the SEDRP web site for Detailswww.serdp.org/funding
15
15
FY11 Statements of Need
16
16
FY11 Statements of Need
● Environmental RestorationDetermination of the Environmental Impacts of Munitions Compounds in the Marine EnvironmentGroundwater Fate, Transport & Treatment of PerfluoroalkylContaminated GroundwaterImproved Understanding of Impacts to Groundwater Quality Post‐remediationImproved Assessment of the Munitions Constituent Source Term on Operational RangesIn‐Situ Remediation of Contaminated Aquatic Sediments ‐ SEED
17
17
FY11 Statements of Need
● Sustainable InfrastructureImpacts of Climate Change on Alaskan Ecological SystemsBehavioral Ecology of CetaceansEcological Forestry and Carbon ManagementEcology and Management of Source‐sink Populations
18
18
FY11 Statements of Need
● Weapons Systems and PlatformsDevelopment of Alternatives to Copper‐Beryllium and Aluminum‐Beryllium Alloys For Military ApplicationsEnvironmentally Benign, Insensitive, Castable, High‐Performance, Minimum‐Smoke Rocket Propellant Understanding the Corrosion Protection Requirements for AdhesiveBond Primers Combustion Science to Reduce Emissions from Military Platforms Burning Alternative FuelsEnvironmentally Benign Low Observable Coating Removal Technologies (Restricted to U.S. Government Organizations Only)Replacement of Hexachloroethane in Handheld Obscurants ‐SEED
19
19
FY11 Statements of Need
● Munitions ManagementAdvanced Technologies for Detection, Discrimination, and Remediation of Military Munitions on Improvements in the Detection and Remediation of Military Munitions UnderwaterMethods to Support Risk‐based Decisions on Munitions Response SitesAdvanced Technologies for Detection, Discrimination, and Remediation of Military Munitions on Land and Underwater ‐SEED
20
20
Core Selection Criteria
● Relevance (Pass/Fail)Does it address the SON Objective?Is it basic research, applied research, or advanced technology development?
● Technical MeritOverall scientific and technical merit of the submission
● PersonnelQualifications capabilities and achievements
● CostReasonableness for the technical complexity
● Transition PlanPlan to transition to implementation or future development
21
21
SEED Selection Criteria
● Relevance (Pass/Fail)Does it address the SON Objective?Is it basic research, applied research, or advanced technology development?
● Technical MeritOverall scientific and technical merit of the submission Strong consideration will be given to innovation
● Transition PotentialClear identification of the critical proof of conceptIdentification of the future development path
22
22
Hallmarks of a Competitive Proposal
● Clearly Addresses the Statement of Need● Demonstrates an understanding of the State of the
Science● Hypothesis Driven Work● Focused on the Technical Approach
Detailed approachClear experimental design
23
23
Sponsored BySERDP and ESTCP
Partners in Environmental TechnologyTechnical Symposium and Workshop
December 1‐3, 2009Marriott Wardman Park Hotel
Washington, D.C.
24
24
SERDP Website
www.serdp.org
25
25
Thank YouAfter viewing the links to additional resources,
please complete our online feedback form.
Thank You
Links to Additional Resources
Feedback Form