Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    1/65

    515 Harvard Avenue EaSeattle WA 98

    Design Review: Recommendation Propo

    (DPD#30132

    prepared or Broadway Estates LOctober 23, 2

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    2/65

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    3/65

    TABLE OF CONTENTS:

    Proposal 1

    Existing Site Conditions 2-7

    Zoning Data 8

    Pertinent Design Guidelines 9

    Site Photographs 10

    Site Survey 11

    Site Analysis / Design Concept Diagrams 12

    EDG Concept Summary 13

    EDG Report 14-15

    EDG Board Direction and Itemized Response 16

    Floor Plans 17-21

    Landscape Materials Plans 22-25

    Elevations and Context Relationship Diagrams 26-29

    Materials. Modulation & Interconnection 30-31Block Scale Perspective 32

    Street Level Views and Context 33-41

    North Wall Modulation Analysis 42

    South Wall Modulation Analysis 43

    Adjacent Windows and Privacy Diagrams 44-47

    Courtyard Entry and Through Block Link

    & Northeast Corner and Cafe Details 48-54

    Lighting and Signage Concept 55

    Site Sections 56-57

    Departures 58-61

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    4/65

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    5/65

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    6/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    2

    Zoning Map

    PROJECT

    SITE

    LR-3

    BOLYSTON AVENUE E (ACCESS STREET)

    HARVARD AVENUE E

    EROYSTR

    EET

    BROADWAY AVENUE E

    (MINOR ARTERIAL STREET)

    E

    MERCERSTREET

    (ACCESSSTREET)

    ER

    EPUBLICANSTREET

    (ACCESSSTREET)

    E

    HARRISONSTREET

    MR

    NC3P-

    40

    NC3-

    40

    NC3-

    40

    NC3P-

    40NC3P-

    40

    NC3-

    40

    LIGHTRAILSTAT

    IONO

    VERLA

    FREQUENT ALL DAY ROUTE #49

    NC3-

    40

    LIGHT RAIL STATION OVERLAY

    N0 25 50 100

    Joule Apartments

    The Mulhol-

    Camelot

    Apartments

    The Quinault

    Apartments

    Glen

    Arms

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    7/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    Existing Uses/Sit

    N

    BROADWAY EAST

    EAST HARRISON STREET

    1

    3

    2 13

    15

    14

    7

    456

    10

    1618

    19

    20

    21 21

    8

    1211

    17

    9

    22

    23

    EAST REPUBLICAN STREET EAST MERCER STREET EAST ROY STREET

    BOYLSTON AVE EAST

    HARVARD AVE EAST

    EXISTING USES

    1. Project Site

    2. Existing Phase 1

    3. Camelot

    4. The Quinault

    5. Glen Arms

    6. Aya Terrace

    7. Mulholland Apartments

    8. Capitol Hill Library

    9. Vertigo

    10.Viceroy

    11. Tashkent Park12. 615 E. Mercer Apartmen

    13. 700 E. Mercer Apartmen

    14. Cornish College

    15. Harvard Court

    16. Harvard Exit Theater

    17. Rainier Chapter House

    18. Loveless Building (Mixed

    Residential)

    19. Roy Street Cae, Fedex,

    Residential20. Byzantion, Rom Mai, Ao

    ChoiceTobbaco, Social S

    Dreamscape Massage, M

    Create: Space, Deluxe

    21. Joule Apartments (Mixed

    22. Broadway Market (QFC,

    Retail/Commercial)

    23.All Pilgrims Church

    RETAIL

    RESIDENTIAL

    PUBLIC USE

    PROJECT SITE

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    8/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    4

    EROYSTREET

    ROADWAYAVENUE E

    MER

    ER

    TREET

    EHARRISONSTREET

    Mulholland

    A. Harvard Avenue East Looking West

    B. Harvard Avenue East Looking East

    Harvard Avenue East Streetscape

    Harvard Ave East

    Harvard Ave East East Mercer StreetEast Republican Street

    A

    Camelot

    Joule ApartmentsJoule Apartments

    PROJECT SITE

    East Republican StreetEast Mercer Street

    B

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    9/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    BROADWAYAVENUE E

    EMERCERSTREET

    HARRI

    N

    TREET

    Boylston Avenue East Str

    C. Boylston Avenue East Looking West

    D. Boylston Avenue East Looking East

    Viceroy

    Aya TerraceGlen ArmsQuinalt

    Capitol Hill Libra

    Tashkent Park615 East Mercer

    PROJECT SITE

    (EXISTING PHASE I)

    Boylston Ave East

    Boylston Ave EastEast Mercer Street East Republican Street

    East Republican Street East Mercer Street

    C

    D

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    10/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    6

    Context Photographs

    6. View Looking South(Harvard Exit Theater)

    5. View Looking North On Harvard

    (Rainier Chapter House)

    2. View Looking North on Harvard (Joule & Mulholland)

    3. View Looking West on Boylston (Tashkent Park)

    4. View Looking Northeast On Harvard

    (Olivar, Joe Bar, Kobo)1. View Looking East on Boylston (Phase I)

    EROYSTREET

    BROADWAYAVENUE E

    EMERCERSTREE

    EHARRISONSTREET

    N

    2

    1

    64

    5

    3

    7. View Looking East from Harvard (The Joule)

    7

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    11/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    EROYSTREET

    ROADWAYAVENUE

    MER

    ER

    TREET

    EHARRISONSTREET

    N

    8. View Looking South On Harvard (Broadway Market Qfc)

    9. View Looking West On Harvard (Camelot)

    10. View Looking South On E. Republican (Capitol Hill Library)

    11. View Looking Southwest towards The Project Site From Harvard

    12. View Looking Northwest At The Project Site From E. Republican St.

    7

    10

    812

    911

    Context Pho

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    12/65

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    13/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    A-3 ENTRANCES VISIBLE

    FROM THE STREET

    A-6 TRANSITIONBETWEEN RESIDENCE

    AND STREET

    A-7 RESIDENTIAL OPEN

    SPACE

    C-2 ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT

    AND CONSISTENCY C-3 HUMAN SCALE

    D-1 PEDESTRIAN OPEN

    SPACES AND ENTRANCES

    Entries should be clearly

    identiable and visible rom the

    street.

    For residential projects, the

    space between the building

    and the sidewalk should

    provide security and privacy

    or residents and encourage

    social interaction among

    residents and neighbors.

    Residential projects should

    be sited to maximize

    opportunities or creating

    usable, attractive, well

    integrated open space.

    Building design elements, details

    and massing should create a well-

    proportioned and unied building orm

    and exhibit an overall architectural

    concept. Buildings should exhibit orm

    and eatures identiying the unctions

    within the building. In general, the roofine

    or top o the structure should be clearly

    distinguished rom its acade walls.

    The design o new buildings should

    incorporate architectural eatures,

    elements and details to achieve a

    good human scale.

    Convenient and attractive access

    to the building entry should be

    provided. Opportunities or creati

    lively, pedestrian-oriented open

    spaces should be considered.

    no supplement Incorporate building entry

    treatments that welcome

    and protect people rom the

    elements and emphasizes the

    building's architecture.

    Incorporate quasi-public open

    space with new residential

    development. Create

    substantial courtyard-style

    open space that is visually

    accessible to the public view

    Use materials and design that is

    compatible with structures in the vicinity i

    those represent the desired neighborhood

    character.

    Incorporate building entry

    treatments that are arched or

    ramed in a manner that welcomes

    people and protects them rom

    the elements and emphasizes the

    building's architecture.

    Provide entryways that link the

    building to the surrounding

    landscape. Create open spaces

    at street level that link to the open

    space o the sidewalk.

    City Design

    Guidelines

    Capitol Hill

    Supplemental

    Guidelines

    Pertinent Design G

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    14/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    10

    Site Photographs

    5. View Looking West Into Site From

    Joule

    4. View Looking North From Site

    2. View Looking South From Site

    3. View Looking West From Site

    1. View Looking East From Site

    BR ADWAYAVENUE E

    EMERCERSTREET

    HARRI

    N

    TREET 12

    5

    3 4

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    15/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    S

    N

    0 15 30 60

    200.01

    100.01

    100.01

    118.79

    55.03

    63.36

    344.00335.35

    345.12

    346.32346.08

    344.35

    PROJECT SITE(18,213 SQUARE FEET)

    EXISTING

    PHASE 1

    THE

    QUINALTCAMELOT

    (4 stories)

    EXISTING

    GARAGE ENTRY

    THE

    MULHOLLAND

    (3 stories)

    THE

    JOULE

    (6 stories)

    AYA TERRACE

    GLEN ARMS

    TASHKENT PARK

    EAST REPUBLICAN STREET

    EAST MERCER STREET

    ANTICIPATED

    ENTRY

    POTENTIAL LINK

    TO PARK

    340338336334332330328

    BOYLSTONEAST

    HA

    RVARDAVEEAST

    B

    ROADWAYEAST

    OAK

    EVERGREEN

    NORWAY MAPLE

    CHINESE CHERRY

    CEDAR

    WHITE ELM

    Shadow Shown: June 25, 10:15 AM

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    16/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    12

    Site Analysis / Design Concept Diagrams

    N

    Community Street Character/Pedestrian Experience

    Planting strip/street trees

    Consistent street edge

    Softened landscape buffer

    Shared residential

    exterior amenity

    space

    Commercialspace: cafe -

    Concept 'C'

    (Refined)

    Connection across

    lobby, through site

    DESIGN CONCEPT AND "CUES"

    COMMUNITYThe proposal's through lot and existing Phase 1 structu

    lends itsel to considering interaction and connection r

    public street o Harvard Ave. E through Phase 2's groun

    All proposed concepts herein position residential indoo

    outdoor amenity space as part o the entry sequence c

    residential gathering spaces visible rom the street, throthe site.

    STREET CHARACTER / PEDESTRIAN EXPERIEHarvard Ave. E rom E. Republican to E. Mercer contain

    dened street edges with only minor, but repetitive varia

    in the existing acades. Planting strips, street trees, an

    yard landscaped setbacks soten the pedestrian experi

    The proposal continues a soten landscape edge on the

    street while introduces mid block variation to the acad

    massing.

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    17/65

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    18/65

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    19/65

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    20/65

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    21/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    Level P01 -

    P02 LEVEL PARKING

    N0 8 16 32

    BOYLSTON

    AVE.E

    EXISTINGGARAGEENTRYTO REMIAN

    E XI T IN P HA E 1 T R AANDRE Y LIN L ATIT REMIA

    EXISTINGRAMP UP

    EXISTINGRAMP DNTOP02

    P HA E 2 T R AANDRE Y LIN

    M LEV

    LOBBY

    PART2

    RES

    PARKING

    PART1

    EXISTING

    PARKING

    L E T RI AL

    ROOM.

    SWITCHGEAR

    RANSFORM

    F

    FDTN

    WALL

    TOP

    L

    1'-41/4"

    1'-1

    F

    FDTNWALL

    OP

    T

    L

    21/2"

    (FNDWALLTOPL)

    ' - 0 / 4" + / -

    8'-33/4"+/-

    EXISTINGEXTERIORSTAIRFROMTERRACEABOVE

    A A V

    A

    E XI T IN P HA E 1L B BY

    CH

    UNIT

    PADS

    ART2

    RES

    PARKING

    PART1

    EXISTING

    PARKING

    ART1

    RES

    STOR

    ART1

    RES

    STOR

    RES

    STOR

    RE

    ELEV

    OBBY

    RES

    STOR

    EXISTINGRAMPUPTOP01

    F

    FDTNWALL

    T

    PL

    1'-41/4"

    1'-1

    FOFDTNWALLTOP

    2"+/-

    8'-3 3/4"+/-

    FOFDTNWALLTOPL21/4"+/-

    11'-1/2

    (FNDWALLT PL)

    9'-03/4"+/-

    P01 LEVEL PARKING

    18

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    22/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    18

    N0 8 16 32

    Level 01 Plan

    LEVEL 01 - SITE PLAN

    ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

    ^ ^ ^ ^

    *

    -

    ?

    //

    =

    //

    =

    =

    =

    =

    )

    /6

    =

    )

    /6

    =

    6

    =

    6

    =

    6

    3

    ::

    :

    :

    d

    d

    6:

    )

    :

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    23/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    D

    43'-7" 26'-1 1/2" 1'-3 5/8"

    5'-0"

    26'-6"

    78'-111/2"

    42'-6 /8

    3

    7'-91/2"

    31'-3 5/8" 4'-1 5/8"

    4 ' 1 1

    7 / 8 "

    ELEV

    OBBY

    LEV#1

    CORR

    LEVEL 03LEVEL 02

    Level 02 -

    20

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    24/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    1B

    CORR

    ELEV

    OBBY

    U1B

    4

    -1

    1/8

    28'-91

    /4"

    4'-33

    /8"

    19'-71/2"

    8

    1/4"

    2'-

    1/2

    2 ' -71/2

    Level 03 - 04 Plans

    LEVEL 04

    N0 8 16 32

    LEVELS 05 - 07

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    25/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    Roof L

    N0 8 16 32

    LEV

    OBBY

    LEV

    CNTRL

    27'- 1/2

    LEV

    LEVEL ROOF

    EXISITNG VIEWS / ROOF CONCEPT

    22

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    26/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    *

    ==

    =

    =

    =6

    =8

    d

    d

    +)

    +* 8

    1

    4

    4

    44

    4

    3

    4

    2

    2

    6

    5 5

    5

    3

    3

    3

    Landscape Materials Plan - Level 01

    N0 4 8 16

    Acer palmatum,

    typ. o 3

    Amelanchier laevis,

    typ. o 3

    Gymn

    dioicu

    Querc

    raine

    'Schm

    o 3

    Franklinia alatamaha

    t

    a

    A-6

    Perennials/Grasses/Gro ndco ers/ Vines

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    27/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    Landscape Materials

    Acer palmatum

    Rhaphiolepsis umbellataPennisetum orientale 'Karley Rose'Helichtotrichon sempervirens

    Astilbe 'Bridal Veil'

    Blechnum spicant

    Hakonechloa macra

    Polysticum munitum

    Euphorbia robbiae Ophiopogon japonicus

    Clethra alnifolia

    Asplenium scolpendriumCornus canadensis Acorus gramineus 'Ogon' Acanthus mollis

    Hydrangea paniculata Sal ix purpureaHamamelis x intermedia

    Fatsia japonica

    Cornus alba 'Elegantissima' Gymnocladus dioicusQuercus frainetto

    'Schmidt'

    Amelanchier laevis Franklinia alatam

    Perennials/Grasses/Groundcovers/ Vines

    Evergreen Shrubs

    ShrubsTrees

    3 Scored Concrete 4 Metal Planter 5 Concrete Planter2 Pedestal Paver1 Artificial Turf 6 Outdoor Seating

    Materials

    24

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    28/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    8

    7

    7

    9

    11

    10

    10

    1010

    10

    12

    10

    10

    11

    Landscape Materials Plan - Roof

    N0 4 8 16

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    29/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    11 Green Roof - Extensive9 Wood Decking 12 P-Patch Planter

    Pennisetum orientale 'Karley Lavendula angustifoliaOphiopogon japonicus

    Cornus sanguineaVaccinium corymbosum

    10 Metal Planter8 Outdoor Seating

    Perennials/Grasses/Groundcovers/Vines

    Deciduous/Evergreen Shrubs

    Landscape Materi

    Materials

    Rhaphiolepsis umbellata Ribes sanguineum

    Miscanthus 'Purpurascens'

    AvenueEast

    ew:RecommendationProposal

    2013

    081632

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    30/65

    AEt

    ationandContextRelationshipDiagram

    esandBoardRecommendationsB-1,C-1,C-2

    EREPUBLICANSTREEsmallscalerelationship

    largerscaleneighborhoodrelationship

    largerscaleneighborhoodrelationship

    Concreteframeandcolumnsreinforcesscaleandtextureofadjacentwindowanddoorsurrounds

    entrycafe

    BROADWAYAVENUEEN

    StreetcompatibilityArchitecturalconceptand

    consistency

    ArchitecturalcontextExposedconcreteframeformssimilarpatternand

    scalerelationshipw/punchedmasonryopeningsand

    windowsurroundsontheMulhollandApartments

    Eastfacadereducedtomultiplesmalerscalebuildingsrelatingtobothsmallscaleadjacentneighbors

    andlargerscalestructuresacrosstheblock

    Openpublicspaceactivatedbycafe.Residential

    lobbyinterconnectedtotheopencourtandcafe

    withoperabledoors

    Mulhollandcornicedatum

    continuedacrossproposedfacadeasaresessedbalcony

    EncourageHuman

    Activity

    Height,bulkandscale

    compatability

    height,bulkandscale

    compatability

    height,bulkandscale

    compatability

    A-2A-4

    B-1

    B-1

    B-1

    C-1

    C-2

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    31/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    BOYLSTON AVENUE E

    HARVARD AVENUE E

    utdoor terra

    Cafe / ntryt

    Court

    small scale relationship

    Camelot parking area

    Quinault apartments

    Camelot in foreground

    larger scale neighborhood relationship

    larger scale neighborhood relationship

    setback datum relative to Camelot

    North Elevation and Contex

    EDG Priorities and Board Recommendations B

    R ADWAYAVENUE E N

    0 8 16 32

    North acade reduces scale with setbacks, modulation

    and changes in material colors and texture.

    height, bulk and scale

    compatability

    height, bulk and scale

    compatability

    Respect or adjacent

    sites

    height, bulk and scal

    compatability

    B-1

    B-1

    A-5

    B-1

    28

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    32/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    etu doorterrra

    small scale relationship

    Mulholland in foregroundGlen Arms

    larger scale neighborhood relationship

    larger scale neighborhood relationship

    datum on Harvard Ave E

    wrapping the corner

    verticalbayannouncing

    outdoorterrace

    HARVARD AV ENUE EBOYLSTON AV ENUE E

    South Elevation and Context Relationship Diagram

    EDG Priorities and Board Recommendations B-1, C-1, C-2

    H V V U

    BROADWAYAVENU

    0 8 16 32

    outdoor terrace space interconnected with residential

    lobby, open court and cae

    with operable doors across lenght o wall

    Encourage Human

    ActivityA-4

    Architectural concept and

    consistency

    Mulholland cornice datum

    wrapped proposed acade

    as resessed balconies

    C-2

    South acade reduced to multiple smaler scale

    buildings relating to both small scale adjacent neigh-

    bors and larger scale structures across the block

    Height, bulk and scale

    compatabilityB-1

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    33/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    cerrut oorte

    small scale relationship

    small scale relationship

    Glen Arms in foreground Mulholland ApartmentsQuinalt Apartments in

    foreground

    Camelot Apartments

    larger scale neighborhood relationshipJoule Apartments in background

    Joule Apartments in background

    larger scale neighborhood relationshipverticalbay

    announcing

    outdoorterrace

    E Republican Street

    E Mercer Street

    West Elevation and Context

    EDG Priorities and Board Recommendations B

    R ADWAYAVENUE E N

    0 8 16 32

    outdoor terrace space interconnected wiht residential

    lobby, open court and cae

    with operable doors across lenght o wall

    Encourage Human

    ActivityA-4

    30

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    34/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    FLUSH GREY

    METAL PANEL

    FIBER CEMENT LAPPED

    SIDING 8" EXPOSURE:

    BRITTLEBUSH

    PRE-FINISHED FIBER

    CEMENT PANEL SYSTEM:

    LIGHT GREY

    CEMENT PANEL SYSTEM;

    24" HORZ JOINTS: URBANE

    BRONZE

    EXPOSED CONCRETE21 3 4 5 6FIBER CEMENT LAPPED

    SIDING 8" EXPOSURE:

    OPEN SEAS

    NORTH EAST CORNERSOUTH EAST CORNERSOUTH WEST CORNER

    5

    4

    2

    2

    7

    4

    4

    4

    1

    8

    3

    6

    6

    Materials, Modulation & Interconnection

    9

    Exterior Finish Materials

    materials and colors contribute to

    the strength o the building's ormand provide a reserved role

    exterior cladding is a supporting

    role with cement ber board

    panels and concealed asteners

    and lap siding with mitered

    corners

    exposed concrete expresses the

    nature o the "5/2" building type.

    C-4

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    35/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    RESIDENTIAL PATIOS ON HARVARD AVENUE EAST CORNER

    1

    8

    6

    7

    2

    7

    6

    8

    6

    ALUMINIUM OPERABLE

    SLIDING DOORS

    LANDSCAPE MATERIAL AT

    RESIDENTIAL PATIOSLANDSCAPE MATERIAL

    BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL

    PATIOS

    ALUMINUM AND GLASS

    GUARDRAIL

    ALUMINIUM AND TRANSLUCENT

    GLASS PRIVACY SCREEN9

    9

    1011

    10 11

    78

    Materials, Modulation & Interco

    Transition Between Resi-dence and Street

    Widened landscaping intergrated with par-

    tial screens at residential patios provide a

    deensible and semi-private

    space without complete enicing

    Streetscape Compatability

    A-6

    A-2

    32

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    36/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    BLOCK SCALE PERSPECTIVE

    N

    Board Direction #2 & #4 B-1 Street Level Views with Context, North Wall and Bulk Analysis (EDG Priorities and Board Recommendations A-2, B-1, C-1, C-2)

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    37/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    HARVARDAVENUEE

    BROADWAYAVENUE E N

    STREET LEVEL VIEWS AND C

    STREET LEVEL VIEW AND CONTEXT - HARVARD AVENUE EAST LOOKING SOUTH STREET LEVEL VIEW AND CONTEXT - HARVARD AVENUE EAST LOOKING NORTH

    EDG Board Direction #2 C

    34

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    38/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    R ADWAYAVENUE E

    EMERCERSTREET

    N

    STREET LEVEL VIEWS AND CONTEXT

    EDG Board Direction #2 C-2, D-6, A-6

    STREET LEVEL VIEW - HARVARD AVENUE EAST LOOKING WEST

    Architectural concept and

    consistency

    Mulholland cornice datumcontinued across proposed acade

    as a resessed balcony

    C-2

    Entrances visible rom street

    vertical "blue block" with projecting

    balconies annouce the building entry

    and public space rom a distance

    A-3

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    39/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    BR ADWAYAVENUE E

    MER

    ER

    TREET

    N

    STREET LEVEL VIEWS AND C

    STREET LEVEL VIEW - HARVARD AVENUE EAST LOOKING NORTHWEST

    EDG Board Direction #2 C

    Architectural concept and

    consistency

    "Yellow and blue blocks" parallel

    to the street maintaing consistant,

    well dened street edges estab-lished by surrounding buildings

    C-2

    Entrances visible rom street

    vertical "blue block" with project-

    ing balconies annouce the building

    entry and public space rom a dis-

    tance

    A-3

    36

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    40/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    NR ADWAYAVENUE E

    EMERCERSTREET

    STREET LEVEL VIEWS AND CONTEXT

    EDG Board Direction #2 C-2, D-6, A-6

    STREET LEVEL VIEW - HARVARD AVENUE EAST LOOKING SOUTHWEST

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    41/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    R ADWAYAVENUE E

    MER

    ER

    TREET

    N

    STREET LEVEL VIEWS AND C

    EDG Board Direction #2 C

    STREET LEVEL VIEW - HARVARD AVENUE EAST LOOKING NORTHWEST (VIEW FROM THE JOULE)

    38

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    42/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    BR ADWAYAVENUE E

    EMERCERSTREET

    STREET LEVEL VIEWS AND CONTEXT

    EDG Board Direction #2 C-2, D-6, A-6

    STREET LEVEL VIEW - HARVARD AVENUE EAST

    N

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    43/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    R ADWAYAVENUE

    MER

    ER

    TREET

    N

    STREET LEVEL VIEWS AND C

    EDG Board

    PEDESTRIAN VIEW - HARVARD AVENUE EAST - LOOKING NORTH

    Architectural concept and

    consistency

    Transition between residence

    and street

    Respect or adjacent sites

    Entrances visible rom street

    vertical "blue block" with project-

    ing balconies annouce the building

    entry and public space rom a dis-

    tance

    SE corner o acade angled away

    rom south neighbor

    "Yellow block" parallel to the street

    maintaing consistant, well dened

    street edges established by sur-

    rounding buildings

    C-2

    A-6

    A-5

    A-3

    40

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    44/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    NBR ADWAYAVENUE E

    EMERCERSTREET

    STREET LEVEL VIEWS AND CONTEXT

    EDG Board Direction #2 C-2, D-6, A-6

    STREET LEVEL VIEW - HARVARD AVENUE EAST, RESIDENTIAL PATIOS

    Transition between

    residence and street

    widened landscaping intergrat-

    ed with partial heightr screens

    at residential patios provide a

    sense o security and privacy

    without completly enicing o

    the patio rom the street

    A-6

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    45/65

    42

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    46/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    B-1; EDG Board Direction #4 - North Wall Modulation Analysis

    CAMELOT

    SURFACE PARKING BELOW

    CAMELOT

    SURFACE PARKING BELOW

    HARVARDAVENUE E

    R ADWAYAVENUE E

    View from East Mercer

    Street looking south

    Shadow Diagrm - North Wall noon sun; March 21st -

    Without Elevator Penthouse

    Shadow Diagrm - North Wall noon sun; March 21st -

    With Elevator Penthouse

    North Wall Axonometric

    Respect or Adjacent

    Sites

    Respect or Adjacent Sites

    A-5

    A-5

    North acade reduce

    multiple, smaller scale

    buildings relating to a

    cent neighbors

    north acade living and dinning rooms o

    units ronting surace parking lot to the

    north rather than directly opposite adjacent

    neighbors

    elevator penthouse near north acade does not add additional

    shadow to adjacent property walls but minimal shadow to its

    rootop

    Height, Bulk and Sca

    CompatabilityB-1

    Height, Bulk and

    CompatabilityB-1

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    47/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    B-1; EDG Board Direction #4 - South Wall Modulation

    SURFACE PARKING

    MULHOLLANDGLEN ARMS`AYA TERRACE

    SURFACE PARKING

    MULHOLLAND

    GLEN ARMS

    -

    MULHOLLAND

    GLEN ARMS

    HARVARD AVENUEE

    R ADWAYAVENUE E

    View from East Republican

    Street looking North

    South Wall Axonometric

    Respect or Adjacent SitesA-5

    South acade re

    tiple, smaller sc

    relating to adjace

    South Facade living and dinning rooms o units

    ronting surace parking lot to the south rather than

    directly opposite adjacent neighbors

    South acade mirroring massing concepts along

    Harvard Ave with verticle bays

    C-2 Architectural Concept and Consistency

    44

    Glen Arm east windows completely obsured

    b d i t i ll

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    48/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    Adjacent Windows and Privacy - WEST SIDE YARD

    EDG Board Direction #1 C-2,D-6 & A-6

    patios dened by pand privacy screens

    oblique views to adjace

    balconies recessed and con-

    tained in building rame obsur-

    ing oblique sight lines

    west acade treated with same im-

    portance as the ront yard to the east;

    sideyard averaging and modulation

    adds texture and a smaller scale relat-ing to Glen Arms

    42" H translucent guardrails

    obsure views to and rom adj

    windows

    occupiable balcony acing

    south, toward parking lot

    windows and doors recessed

    urther than the 7'-0" setback

    and is greater than adj. Prop-

    erty's 7'-8" non compliant rear

    yard setback

    proposed wood slat s

    hides exisitng chainli

    adjacent property wil

    vide privacy i chain

    removed

    residential terrace b

    with landscaping to sc

    provide privacy

    Respect or Adjac

    Sites

    View o exisitng

    side yard photo

    Respect or Adjac

    Sites

    Bedroom w/

    corner view

    Respect or Adjacent

    Sites

    Architectural Concept and

    Consistency

    Respect or Adja

    Sites

    landscaping to a

    special site cond

    Existing West Side Yard / Rear Yard

    of Glen Arms

    Ground level - west side yard / rear yard of Glen Arms

    levels 02 - 03 - west side yard partial plan

    West Eelvation w/ Glen Arms in Foreground

    E-3

    A-5

    A-5

    A-5

    A-5

    A-5

    C-2

    LIV LIV

    KITKIT

    KITKIT

    BR

    BR

    BR

    BRB

    B

    A-5

    by proposed screening or exterior walls

    Glen Arm east windows partially obsured by

    proposed translucent guardrails

    Glen Arm east windows opposite proposed

    windows

    Respect or Adjacent Sites

    Glen Arms windows rom occupiable spac-

    es are either ullly or paritally obsured rom

    direct opposing views rom proposed win-

    dows.

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    49/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    Adjacent Windows and Privacy - WEST S

    EDG Board Direction #1 C

    patios with planting and privacy s

    obsure oblique views to adjacent u

    proposed wood slat ence hide

    chainlink on adjacent property an

    vide privacy i ever the chainlink is

    Respect or Adjacent Sites

    Respect or Adjacent Sites

    Section through rear yard of Glen Armsnote: this Section cut has very minimal overlap with opposing windows.

    See plans and elevations for extent of exposure.

    View of West Side Yard Looking SouthA-5

    BR

    BR

    BR

    42" H translucent guardrails

    obsure views to and rom

    adj windows above eye level

    A-5

    46

    Respect or Adja

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    50/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    location o cae stotoilet room increase

    the north, mitigate s

    light

    minimal opposing

    between buildings

    w/ ground level land

    minimal opposing windows

    between buildings (proposed

    bedroom opposite circulation

    space

    majority o windows

    ing spaces opposite

    ing - not adjacent to the north

    enhanced landscap

    moval o overgrow

    trees to adj propert

    ing character o entr

    natural daylight to l

    Respect or Ad

    Sites

    Respect or Ad

    Sites

    Respect or Adjacent

    Sites

    Respect or Adja

    Sites

    Respect or Adjacent

    Sites

    Existing North Side Yard of Camelot Apartments

    at Harvard Avenue East Looking West

    Existing North Side Yard of Camelot Apartments

    at Harvard Avenue East Looking West - mid block

    Adjacent Windows and Privacy - NORTH SIDE YARD

    A-5

    A-5

    A-5

    A-5

    A-5 E-3

    North Eelvation w/ Camelot Apartments in

    foreground

    NE corner - Level 01NE corner - Level 02 - 03

    View o exisitng

    side yard photo

    c a e

    View o exisitng

    side yard photo

    p a r k i n g 1

    story below

    C a m e l o tC a m e l o t living /dining

    living /

    dining

    living /dining

    living /

    diningk i t

    k i tk i t

    k i tc i r c

    c i r c

    evelvator core setback; inrequent

    public nature

    privacy screening and landscape

    buering to soten edge at Camelot\

    retaining wall

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    51/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    Adjacent Windows and Privacy - SOUTH S

    Existing South Side Yard of Mulholland Apartments

    at Harvard Avenue East Looking West

    Existing South Side Yard of Mulholland Apartments

    at Harvard Avenue East Looking East

    South Eelvation w/ Mulholland in Foreground

    View o exisitng

    side yard photoView o exisitng

    side yard photo

    Respect o

    Sites

    Respect o

    Sites

    Respect o

    Sites

    A-5

    A-5

    A-5

    minimal oppos

    between buildin

    bedroom oppos

    space

    egress stair encl

    oot trac) oppo

    corner window

    toward street, a

    Mulholland corn

    Levels 02 -03 South Side Yard Mulholland Apartments

    Levels 02 -03 South Side Yard Mulholland Apartments

    Ground Level - South Side Yard Mulholland Apartments

    LIVLIV LIVLIV KITKIT BRBR C

    C

    C

    C

    C

    C

    48

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    52/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    Partial FloCOURTYARD ENTRY AND THROUGH BLOCK LINK

    EDG Board Direction #5 D-1, A-7

    open public space activated by cae residential

    lobby interconnected to the open court and cae

    with operable doors

    entries to the cae and building are shared

    by the outdoor court; this court expands

    to connect the lobby and cae.

    special material treatment on the south

    wall and the exposed concrete columns

    reinorce the inside-outside pedestrian

    connection o the space

    Encourage Human ActivityPedestrian Open Spaces and EntrancesArchitectural Context and ConsistencyResidential Open Space A-4D-1C-2A-7

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    53/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    Enlarged Section Axon through Entry Court, Lobby & Residential terrace

    Example of a neighborhood cafe

    (711 Bellevue Ave.)

    Cafe and Lobby Material Concept and Imagery Example of proposed operable doors

    interconnecting interior and exterior spaces

    COURTYARD ENTRY AND THROUGH BLO

    EDG Board Direction

    lobby doubles as an extension o

    the entry court and caeoutdoor terrace space interconnect-

    ed with the residential lobby, open

    court and cae by operable doorsacross lenght o wall

    Encourage Human ActivityResidential Open Space A-4A-7 A-4D-1

    open public spac

    by cae. Residenti

    lobby interconnecopen court and ca

    erable doors

    entries to the cae and building

    are shared by the outdoor entry

    court; this court is expandediconnecting the lobby and court

    via operable door

    Encourage HumanPedestrian Open Spaces and

    Entrances

    50

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    54/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    NBROADWAYAVENUE E

    EMERCERSTREET

    NORTHEAST CORNER AND CAFE DETAILS

    EDG Board Direction #6 A-2

    HARVARD AVENUE EAST LOOKING WEST

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    55/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    HARVARD AVENUE EAST LOOKING WEST - VIEW OF ENTRY COURT, CAFE ENTRY AND CAFE - LOBBY

    COURTYARD ENTRY AND THROUGH BLO

    EDG Board Direction

    R ADWAYAVENUE E

    MER

    ER

    TREET

    52

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    56/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    COURTYARD ENTRY AND THROUGH BLOCK LINK

    EDG Board Direction #5 D-1, A-7

    NBR ADWAYAVENUE E

    EMERCERSTREET

    RESIDENTIAL TERRACE - FROM CORNER OF GLEN ARMS

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    57/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    COURTYARD ENTRY AND THROUGH BLO

    EDG Board Direction

    R ADWAYAVENUE E

    EMERCERSTREET

    N

    RESIDENTIAL TERRACE - FROM NE CORNER OF GLEN ARMS

    54

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    58/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    BR ADWAYAVENUE E

    ERCERSTREET

    EM

    NORTHEAST CORNER AND CAFE DETAILS

    EDG Board Direction #6 A-2

    HARVARD AVENUE EAST LOOKING SOUTHWEST

    recessed exterior downlight surace mounted exterior

    wall sconceE1 E2

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    59/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    EXTERIOR LIGHTING PLAN AND SIGNAGE C

    N0 5 10 20

    recessed step light

    Signage Concept

    Simple door numbers and blade sign or the cae are organized around the

    entry court to strengthen the interconnectedness o the spaces.

    directional landscape acce

    lighting

    E1

    E3

    D-9

    E4

    E2

    E2

    E2

    E2

    E2

    E2

    E2

    E3

    E3

    E3

    E3

    E4

    E4

    E4

    E4

    E1

    E1E1

    Shown with CCap

    in BronzeWrinkle(BZW) fnish

    73/16"(183mm)

    Rectilinear

    MATERIAL

    ALU

    VOLTAGE

    t7tt

    2.7K

    CCT

    3 K 4 K

    56

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    60/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    EAST / WEST SITE SECTION

    BROADWAYAVENUE E

    MER

    ER

    TREET

    0 4 8 16

    EDG Board Direction #3 A-5

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    61/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    0 4 8 16

    BROADWAYAVENUE E

    NORTH / SOUTH

    EDG Board Direction #3 A-5 - S

    N

    58

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    62/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    CODE

    CITATION

    DEVELOPMENT

    STANDARD REQUIREMENT REQUEST JUSTIFICATION RELEVANT DESIGN GUIDELINES

    DRB

    PROPOSAL

    SMC 23.45.528 Structure width and

    depth limits or lots

    in Midrise zones

    greater than 9,000

    square eet in size

    The depth o principal structures

    shall not exceed 75 percent o the

    depth o the lot, except as provided

    in subsection 23.45.528.B.2.

    Waive structure depth

    requirement rom 75% to

    approximately 88% o lot

    depth

    A departure request or an increase in the allowable

    structure depth will aord the project greater fexibility

    to respond to the intent o the design guidlines and

    greater incentive to promote the CIty's workorce housign

    incentives.

    (See page 60 -61 "Departure #2 - Structure Depth")

    Note: this departure request does not impact proximity

    to adjacent neighbors and is not requesting a structure tobe deeper than allowed. The intention o the departure is

    to promote the intent o SMC 23.45.528.B.2 by providing

    meaningul public open space and acade modulation that

    allows a structure to be deeper than a simple application o

    the code (23.45.528.B.1)

    The requested departure better meets and exceeds the d

    guidlines listed below

    A-4 Encourge Human Activity

    A-5 Respect for adjacent Sites

    A-6 Transition Between Residence and Street

    A-7 Residential Open Space\

    C-3 Human Scale

    D-1 Pedestrian Open Spaces and Entrances

    SMC 23.45.518 Setbacks and

    Separations

    Table "B"- Front and side setback

    rom street lot lines: 7 oot average

    setback; 5 oot minimum setback

    Waive ront setback

    requirement.

    A departure request to the min ront setback requirement

    o 5'-0" and allow or averaging the acade area to compliy

    with the 7'-0" setback. This will aord the project greater

    fexibility to orm an open space along Harvard Avenue

    E. Project intent is to create a more linear open spacethat expands into a Also note the portion o the code

    which allows an no ront setback requirement when an

    entry courtyard is provided, but that does not meet the

    prescribed dimensions or the entry courtyard in SMC

    23.45.518.

    (See page 52 "Departure #1 - Min Front setback)

    A-6 Transition Between Residence and Street

    A-7 Residential Open Space

    Incorporate quasi-public open space with new residential

    development or redevelopment, with special ocus on corne

    landscape treatments and courtyard entries.

    Departure Requests

    SFBUILDINGAREASWITHINAVERAGESETBACKS

    FRONTYARDAMOUNTOFAREAWITHINAVESETBACK

    ROOF N/A

    LEVEL07 77

    If the structure depth departure was granted, how would this proposal meet or exceed the citys design guidelines?

    DEPARTURE JUSTIFICATION

    The proposal requests maintaining the ave setback o 7'-0." The proposal only asks to reduce the min dimension or ave

    rom 5'-0" to 0'-0." The diagrams below indicate the portions o acade set back less than 5'-0" rom the property line.

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    63/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    Departure #1 - Min 5'-0" Front Yard

    LEVEL 02 LEVEL 01LEVEL 04LEVELS 05-07 LEVEL 03

    LEVEL06 77

    LEVEL05 77

    LEVEL04 65

    LEVEL03 90

    LEVEL02 174

    LEVEL01 329

    TOTALSFAREAOFFAADEWITHINAVERAGESETBACK 247

    spirit o SMC 23.45.518, which allows or no ront yard setback, the proposal has generous public open space (see p. at

    ground level (see p.17) and signicant setbacks on the foors above to still maintain an average ront setback o s area (2

    which is greater than 7'-0" rom the property line. (see total foor area beyond 7t on the chart to the let o this page.)

    60

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    64/65

    515 Harvard Avenue East

    Design Review: Recommendation Proposal

    October 23, 201312037

    Departure #2 - Structure Depth SMC.23.45.518

    DIAGRAM 1 - COMPLIANT STRUCTURE DEPTH

    Does not regulate proximity to adjacent neighbors

    Departure request does not propose to be closer to neighbors than allowed

    Proposal does not request any side yard departures.

    23.45.528 STRUCTURE WIDTH AND DEPTH LIMITS FOR LOTS IN MIDRISE ZONES

    GREATER THAN 9,000 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE

    The width and depth limits of this Section 23.45.528 apply to lots in MR zones that are greater than 9,000

    square feet in lot area.

    A. The width of principal structures shall not exceed 150 feet.B. Structure depth.

    1. The depth of principal structures shall not exceed 75 percent of the depth of the lot, except as

    provided in subsection 23.45.528.B.2.

    2. Exceptions to structure depth limit. To allow for front setback averaging and courtyards as provided

    in Section 23.45.518, structure depth may exceed the limit set in subsection 23.45.528.B.1 if the total lot

    coverage resulting from the increased structure depth does not exceed the lot coverage that would have

    otherwise been allowed without use of the courtyard or front setback averaging provisions.

    DIAGRAM 2 - COMPLIANT STRUCTURE DEPTH

    Does not limit depth of structure

    SMC.23.45.528.b.2 allows a structure to exceed the allowed depth i the courtyard provision is met and the building

    ootprint does not increase more than determined i there was not courtyard or ront yard averageing.

    THEREFORE, IF AREA 'A' (diagram 1) = AREA 'B' W/ COURTYARD (diagram 2); then STRUCTURE

    DEPTH IS COMPLIANT - NO DEPARTURE REQUIRED

    CONCLUSION:Diagram 1 demonstrates this code does not regulate a structure rom being too close to its neighbors.

    Diagram 2 demonstrates SMC.23.45.528 allows a deeper structure than 75% o the lot depth, provied a generous

    modulation and public open space to the ront yard. The departure request ollows this intent to allow or a deeper

    structure than 75% o the lot depth by compensating via meaningul public space and modulation to the rontacade. (See Diagram 3 on p. 57)

    operable doors and windows between the sidew

    the outdoor entry court, activated by the lobby a

    ampifes the residential open space and the ped

    environment

    A-6

    A-7

  • 7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602

    65/65

    515 Harvard A

    Design Review: Recommendati

    Octo

    Departure #2 - Structure Depth SMC

    Does the departure request: better meet or exceed the intent of design guidelines than a design that simply meets

    Land Use Code. - p. iv Design Review: Guidelines for Multifamily and Commercial Buildings.

    TRANSITION BETWEEN RESIDENCE AND STREET

    ENCOURAGE HUMAN ACTIVITY

    expression o the concrete rame; translucent

    balconies and acade modulation provide human

    to the pedestrian experiance

    increased setback along Harvard Avenue East w

    landscaping and parially screened patio areas so

    the transition between residences and the street

    operable doors and windows between the sidew

    and cae and between the cae and lobby streng

    integration between the residence and public

    the outdoor court, activated by the lobby and res

    amenity space adds to the residential open spac

    pedestrian environment

    operable sliding doors to the outdoor court, activ

    the lobby and residential amenity space continue

    pedestrian experance through the site

    RESIDENTIAL OPEN SPACE

    HUMAN SCALE

    PEDESTRIAN OPEN SPACES AND ENTRANCESA-6

    A-4

    A-6

    A-7

    A-7

    C-3

    C-3

    D-1

    D-1

    D-1

    A 6

    A-6

    DIAGRAM 3- STRUCTURE DEPTH DEPAR TURE REQUESTJustification to "better meet or exceed the intent of design guidlines."

    1. The depture request promotes generous, public open space intended or gathering along the street that

    encourages human activity.

    2. The size o the proposed outdoor entry court exceeds the area required by SMC 23.45.528.b.2 This area

    extends into and through the enlarged residentail lobby. The lobby is intened to be shared between the court

    and cae. This area exceeds the resultant area in diagram 2. whose structure depth complies with the code

    without the need or a departure.

    3. The proposed departure request does not increase or aect proximity to neighbors.

    4. The proposed departure request better aligns with the City's values to increase density in the MR zone

    through the Workorce Housing Incentive. A strict interpetation o SMC 23.45.528 contradicts increasingdensity and discourages modulation.

    5. Specifc design guidlines the departure request promotes:

    encourage human activityA-4

    encourage human activityA-4