Upload
chs-blog
View
221
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
1/65
515 Harvard Avenue EaSeattle WA 98
Design Review: Recommendation Propo
(DPD#30132
prepared or Broadway Estates LOctober 23, 2
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
2/65
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
3/65
TABLE OF CONTENTS:
Proposal 1
Existing Site Conditions 2-7
Zoning Data 8
Pertinent Design Guidelines 9
Site Photographs 10
Site Survey 11
Site Analysis / Design Concept Diagrams 12
EDG Concept Summary 13
EDG Report 14-15
EDG Board Direction and Itemized Response 16
Floor Plans 17-21
Landscape Materials Plans 22-25
Elevations and Context Relationship Diagrams 26-29
Materials. Modulation & Interconnection 30-31Block Scale Perspective 32
Street Level Views and Context 33-41
North Wall Modulation Analysis 42
South Wall Modulation Analysis 43
Adjacent Windows and Privacy Diagrams 44-47
Courtyard Entry and Through Block Link
& Northeast Corner and Cafe Details 48-54
Lighting and Signage Concept 55
Site Sections 56-57
Departures 58-61
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
4/65
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
5/65
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
6/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
2
Zoning Map
PROJECT
SITE
LR-3
BOLYSTON AVENUE E (ACCESS STREET)
HARVARD AVENUE E
EROYSTR
EET
BROADWAY AVENUE E
(MINOR ARTERIAL STREET)
E
MERCERSTREET
(ACCESSSTREET)
ER
EPUBLICANSTREET
(ACCESSSTREET)
E
HARRISONSTREET
MR
NC3P-
40
NC3-
40
NC3-
40
NC3P-
40NC3P-
40
NC3-
40
LIGHTRAILSTAT
IONO
VERLA
FREQUENT ALL DAY ROUTE #49
NC3-
40
LIGHT RAIL STATION OVERLAY
N0 25 50 100
Joule Apartments
The Mulhol-
Camelot
Apartments
The Quinault
Apartments
Glen
Arms
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
7/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
Existing Uses/Sit
N
BROADWAY EAST
EAST HARRISON STREET
1
3
2 13
15
14
7
456
10
1618
19
20
21 21
8
1211
17
9
22
23
EAST REPUBLICAN STREET EAST MERCER STREET EAST ROY STREET
BOYLSTON AVE EAST
HARVARD AVE EAST
EXISTING USES
1. Project Site
2. Existing Phase 1
3. Camelot
4. The Quinault
5. Glen Arms
6. Aya Terrace
7. Mulholland Apartments
8. Capitol Hill Library
9. Vertigo
10.Viceroy
11. Tashkent Park12. 615 E. Mercer Apartmen
13. 700 E. Mercer Apartmen
14. Cornish College
15. Harvard Court
16. Harvard Exit Theater
17. Rainier Chapter House
18. Loveless Building (Mixed
Residential)
19. Roy Street Cae, Fedex,
Residential20. Byzantion, Rom Mai, Ao
ChoiceTobbaco, Social S
Dreamscape Massage, M
Create: Space, Deluxe
21. Joule Apartments (Mixed
22. Broadway Market (QFC,
Retail/Commercial)
23.All Pilgrims Church
RETAIL
RESIDENTIAL
PUBLIC USE
PROJECT SITE
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
8/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
4
EROYSTREET
ROADWAYAVENUE E
MER
ER
TREET
EHARRISONSTREET
Mulholland
A. Harvard Avenue East Looking West
B. Harvard Avenue East Looking East
Harvard Avenue East Streetscape
Harvard Ave East
Harvard Ave East East Mercer StreetEast Republican Street
A
Camelot
Joule ApartmentsJoule Apartments
PROJECT SITE
East Republican StreetEast Mercer Street
B
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
9/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
BROADWAYAVENUE E
EMERCERSTREET
HARRI
N
TREET
Boylston Avenue East Str
C. Boylston Avenue East Looking West
D. Boylston Avenue East Looking East
Viceroy
Aya TerraceGlen ArmsQuinalt
Capitol Hill Libra
Tashkent Park615 East Mercer
PROJECT SITE
(EXISTING PHASE I)
Boylston Ave East
Boylston Ave EastEast Mercer Street East Republican Street
East Republican Street East Mercer Street
C
D
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
10/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
6
Context Photographs
6. View Looking South(Harvard Exit Theater)
5. View Looking North On Harvard
(Rainier Chapter House)
2. View Looking North on Harvard (Joule & Mulholland)
3. View Looking West on Boylston (Tashkent Park)
4. View Looking Northeast On Harvard
(Olivar, Joe Bar, Kobo)1. View Looking East on Boylston (Phase I)
EROYSTREET
BROADWAYAVENUE E
EMERCERSTREE
EHARRISONSTREET
N
2
1
64
5
3
7. View Looking East from Harvard (The Joule)
7
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
11/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
EROYSTREET
ROADWAYAVENUE
MER
ER
TREET
EHARRISONSTREET
N
8. View Looking South On Harvard (Broadway Market Qfc)
9. View Looking West On Harvard (Camelot)
10. View Looking South On E. Republican (Capitol Hill Library)
11. View Looking Southwest towards The Project Site From Harvard
12. View Looking Northwest At The Project Site From E. Republican St.
7
10
812
911
Context Pho
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
12/65
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
13/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
A-3 ENTRANCES VISIBLE
FROM THE STREET
A-6 TRANSITIONBETWEEN RESIDENCE
AND STREET
A-7 RESIDENTIAL OPEN
SPACE
C-2 ARCHITECTURAL CONCEPT
AND CONSISTENCY C-3 HUMAN SCALE
D-1 PEDESTRIAN OPEN
SPACES AND ENTRANCES
Entries should be clearly
identiable and visible rom the
street.
For residential projects, the
space between the building
and the sidewalk should
provide security and privacy
or residents and encourage
social interaction among
residents and neighbors.
Residential projects should
be sited to maximize
opportunities or creating
usable, attractive, well
integrated open space.
Building design elements, details
and massing should create a well-
proportioned and unied building orm
and exhibit an overall architectural
concept. Buildings should exhibit orm
and eatures identiying the unctions
within the building. In general, the roofine
or top o the structure should be clearly
distinguished rom its acade walls.
The design o new buildings should
incorporate architectural eatures,
elements and details to achieve a
good human scale.
Convenient and attractive access
to the building entry should be
provided. Opportunities or creati
lively, pedestrian-oriented open
spaces should be considered.
no supplement Incorporate building entry
treatments that welcome
and protect people rom the
elements and emphasizes the
building's architecture.
Incorporate quasi-public open
space with new residential
development. Create
substantial courtyard-style
open space that is visually
accessible to the public view
Use materials and design that is
compatible with structures in the vicinity i
those represent the desired neighborhood
character.
Incorporate building entry
treatments that are arched or
ramed in a manner that welcomes
people and protects them rom
the elements and emphasizes the
building's architecture.
Provide entryways that link the
building to the surrounding
landscape. Create open spaces
at street level that link to the open
space o the sidewalk.
City Design
Guidelines
Capitol Hill
Supplemental
Guidelines
Pertinent Design G
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
14/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
10
Site Photographs
5. View Looking West Into Site From
Joule
4. View Looking North From Site
2. View Looking South From Site
3. View Looking West From Site
1. View Looking East From Site
BR ADWAYAVENUE E
EMERCERSTREET
HARRI
N
TREET 12
5
3 4
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
15/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
S
N
0 15 30 60
200.01
100.01
100.01
118.79
55.03
63.36
344.00335.35
345.12
346.32346.08
344.35
PROJECT SITE(18,213 SQUARE FEET)
EXISTING
PHASE 1
THE
QUINALTCAMELOT
(4 stories)
EXISTING
GARAGE ENTRY
THE
MULHOLLAND
(3 stories)
THE
JOULE
(6 stories)
AYA TERRACE
GLEN ARMS
TASHKENT PARK
EAST REPUBLICAN STREET
EAST MERCER STREET
ANTICIPATED
ENTRY
POTENTIAL LINK
TO PARK
340338336334332330328
BOYLSTONEAST
HA
RVARDAVEEAST
B
ROADWAYEAST
OAK
EVERGREEN
NORWAY MAPLE
CHINESE CHERRY
CEDAR
WHITE ELM
Shadow Shown: June 25, 10:15 AM
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
16/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
12
Site Analysis / Design Concept Diagrams
N
Community Street Character/Pedestrian Experience
Planting strip/street trees
Consistent street edge
Softened landscape buffer
Shared residential
exterior amenity
space
Commercialspace: cafe -
Concept 'C'
(Refined)
Connection across
lobby, through site
DESIGN CONCEPT AND "CUES"
COMMUNITYThe proposal's through lot and existing Phase 1 structu
lends itsel to considering interaction and connection r
public street o Harvard Ave. E through Phase 2's groun
All proposed concepts herein position residential indoo
outdoor amenity space as part o the entry sequence c
residential gathering spaces visible rom the street, throthe site.
STREET CHARACTER / PEDESTRIAN EXPERIEHarvard Ave. E rom E. Republican to E. Mercer contain
dened street edges with only minor, but repetitive varia
in the existing acades. Planting strips, street trees, an
yard landscaped setbacks soten the pedestrian experi
The proposal continues a soten landscape edge on the
street while introduces mid block variation to the acad
massing.
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
17/65
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
18/65
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
19/65
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
20/65
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
21/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
Level P01 -
P02 LEVEL PARKING
N0 8 16 32
BOYLSTON
AVE.E
EXISTINGGARAGEENTRYTO REMIAN
E XI T IN P HA E 1 T R AANDRE Y LIN L ATIT REMIA
EXISTINGRAMP UP
EXISTINGRAMP DNTOP02
P HA E 2 T R AANDRE Y LIN
M LEV
LOBBY
PART2
RES
PARKING
PART1
EXISTING
PARKING
L E T RI AL
ROOM.
SWITCHGEAR
RANSFORM
F
FDTN
WALL
TOP
L
1'-41/4"
1'-1
F
FDTNWALL
OP
T
L
21/2"
(FNDWALLTOPL)
' - 0 / 4" + / -
8'-33/4"+/-
EXISTINGEXTERIORSTAIRFROMTERRACEABOVE
A A V
A
E XI T IN P HA E 1L B BY
CH
UNIT
PADS
ART2
RES
PARKING
PART1
EXISTING
PARKING
ART1
RES
STOR
ART1
RES
STOR
RES
STOR
RE
ELEV
OBBY
RES
STOR
EXISTINGRAMPUPTOP01
F
FDTNWALL
T
PL
1'-41/4"
1'-1
FOFDTNWALLTOP
2"+/-
8'-3 3/4"+/-
FOFDTNWALLTOPL21/4"+/-
11'-1/2
(FNDWALLT PL)
9'-03/4"+/-
P01 LEVEL PARKING
18
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
22/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
18
N0 8 16 32
Level 01 Plan
LEVEL 01 - SITE PLAN
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
^ ^ ^ ^
*
-
?
//
=
//
=
=
=
=
)
/6
=
)
/6
=
6
=
6
=
6
3
::
:
:
d
d
6:
)
:
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
23/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
D
43'-7" 26'-1 1/2" 1'-3 5/8"
5'-0"
26'-6"
78'-111/2"
42'-6 /8
3
7'-91/2"
31'-3 5/8" 4'-1 5/8"
4 ' 1 1
7 / 8 "
ELEV
OBBY
LEV#1
CORR
LEVEL 03LEVEL 02
Level 02 -
20
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
24/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
1B
CORR
ELEV
OBBY
U1B
4
-1
1/8
28'-91
/4"
4'-33
/8"
19'-71/2"
8
1/4"
2'-
1/2
2 ' -71/2
Level 03 - 04 Plans
LEVEL 04
N0 8 16 32
LEVELS 05 - 07
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
25/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
Roof L
N0 8 16 32
LEV
OBBY
LEV
CNTRL
27'- 1/2
LEV
LEVEL ROOF
EXISITNG VIEWS / ROOF CONCEPT
22
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
26/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
*
==
=
=
=6
=8
d
d
+)
+* 8
1
4
4
44
4
3
4
2
2
6
5 5
5
3
3
3
Landscape Materials Plan - Level 01
N0 4 8 16
Acer palmatum,
typ. o 3
Amelanchier laevis,
typ. o 3
Gymn
dioicu
Querc
raine
'Schm
o 3
Franklinia alatamaha
t
a
A-6
Perennials/Grasses/Gro ndco ers/ Vines
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
27/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
Landscape Materials
Acer palmatum
Rhaphiolepsis umbellataPennisetum orientale 'Karley Rose'Helichtotrichon sempervirens
Astilbe 'Bridal Veil'
Blechnum spicant
Hakonechloa macra
Polysticum munitum
Euphorbia robbiae Ophiopogon japonicus
Clethra alnifolia
Asplenium scolpendriumCornus canadensis Acorus gramineus 'Ogon' Acanthus mollis
Hydrangea paniculata Sal ix purpureaHamamelis x intermedia
Fatsia japonica
Cornus alba 'Elegantissima' Gymnocladus dioicusQuercus frainetto
'Schmidt'
Amelanchier laevis Franklinia alatam
Perennials/Grasses/Groundcovers/ Vines
Evergreen Shrubs
ShrubsTrees
3 Scored Concrete 4 Metal Planter 5 Concrete Planter2 Pedestal Paver1 Artificial Turf 6 Outdoor Seating
Materials
24
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
28/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
8
7
7
9
11
10
10
1010
10
12
10
10
11
Landscape Materials Plan - Roof
N0 4 8 16
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
29/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
11 Green Roof - Extensive9 Wood Decking 12 P-Patch Planter
Pennisetum orientale 'Karley Lavendula angustifoliaOphiopogon japonicus
Cornus sanguineaVaccinium corymbosum
10 Metal Planter8 Outdoor Seating
Perennials/Grasses/Groundcovers/Vines
Deciduous/Evergreen Shrubs
Landscape Materi
Materials
Rhaphiolepsis umbellata Ribes sanguineum
Miscanthus 'Purpurascens'
AvenueEast
ew:RecommendationProposal
2013
081632
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
30/65
AEt
ationandContextRelationshipDiagram
esandBoardRecommendationsB-1,C-1,C-2
EREPUBLICANSTREEsmallscalerelationship
largerscaleneighborhoodrelationship
largerscaleneighborhoodrelationship
Concreteframeandcolumnsreinforcesscaleandtextureofadjacentwindowanddoorsurrounds
entrycafe
BROADWAYAVENUEEN
StreetcompatibilityArchitecturalconceptand
consistency
ArchitecturalcontextExposedconcreteframeformssimilarpatternand
scalerelationshipw/punchedmasonryopeningsand
windowsurroundsontheMulhollandApartments
Eastfacadereducedtomultiplesmalerscalebuildingsrelatingtobothsmallscaleadjacentneighbors
andlargerscalestructuresacrosstheblock
Openpublicspaceactivatedbycafe.Residential
lobbyinterconnectedtotheopencourtandcafe
withoperabledoors
Mulhollandcornicedatum
continuedacrossproposedfacadeasaresessedbalcony
EncourageHuman
Activity
Height,bulkandscale
compatability
height,bulkandscale
compatability
height,bulkandscale
compatability
A-2A-4
B-1
B-1
B-1
C-1
C-2
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
31/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
BOYLSTON AVENUE E
HARVARD AVENUE E
utdoor terra
Cafe / ntryt
Court
small scale relationship
Camelot parking area
Quinault apartments
Camelot in foreground
larger scale neighborhood relationship
larger scale neighborhood relationship
setback datum relative to Camelot
North Elevation and Contex
EDG Priorities and Board Recommendations B
R ADWAYAVENUE E N
0 8 16 32
North acade reduces scale with setbacks, modulation
and changes in material colors and texture.
height, bulk and scale
compatability
height, bulk and scale
compatability
Respect or adjacent
sites
height, bulk and scal
compatability
B-1
B-1
A-5
B-1
28
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
32/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
etu doorterrra
small scale relationship
Mulholland in foregroundGlen Arms
larger scale neighborhood relationship
larger scale neighborhood relationship
datum on Harvard Ave E
wrapping the corner
verticalbayannouncing
outdoorterrace
HARVARD AV ENUE EBOYLSTON AV ENUE E
South Elevation and Context Relationship Diagram
EDG Priorities and Board Recommendations B-1, C-1, C-2
H V V U
BROADWAYAVENU
0 8 16 32
outdoor terrace space interconnected with residential
lobby, open court and cae
with operable doors across lenght o wall
Encourage Human
ActivityA-4
Architectural concept and
consistency
Mulholland cornice datum
wrapped proposed acade
as resessed balconies
C-2
South acade reduced to multiple smaler scale
buildings relating to both small scale adjacent neigh-
bors and larger scale structures across the block
Height, bulk and scale
compatabilityB-1
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
33/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
cerrut oorte
small scale relationship
small scale relationship
Glen Arms in foreground Mulholland ApartmentsQuinalt Apartments in
foreground
Camelot Apartments
larger scale neighborhood relationshipJoule Apartments in background
Joule Apartments in background
larger scale neighborhood relationshipverticalbay
announcing
outdoorterrace
E Republican Street
E Mercer Street
West Elevation and Context
EDG Priorities and Board Recommendations B
R ADWAYAVENUE E N
0 8 16 32
outdoor terrace space interconnected wiht residential
lobby, open court and cae
with operable doors across lenght o wall
Encourage Human
ActivityA-4
30
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
34/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
FLUSH GREY
METAL PANEL
FIBER CEMENT LAPPED
SIDING 8" EXPOSURE:
BRITTLEBUSH
PRE-FINISHED FIBER
CEMENT PANEL SYSTEM:
LIGHT GREY
CEMENT PANEL SYSTEM;
24" HORZ JOINTS: URBANE
BRONZE
EXPOSED CONCRETE21 3 4 5 6FIBER CEMENT LAPPED
SIDING 8" EXPOSURE:
OPEN SEAS
NORTH EAST CORNERSOUTH EAST CORNERSOUTH WEST CORNER
5
4
2
2
7
4
4
4
1
8
3
6
6
Materials, Modulation & Interconnection
9
Exterior Finish Materials
materials and colors contribute to
the strength o the building's ormand provide a reserved role
exterior cladding is a supporting
role with cement ber board
panels and concealed asteners
and lap siding with mitered
corners
exposed concrete expresses the
nature o the "5/2" building type.
C-4
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
35/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
RESIDENTIAL PATIOS ON HARVARD AVENUE EAST CORNER
1
8
6
7
2
7
6
8
6
ALUMINIUM OPERABLE
SLIDING DOORS
LANDSCAPE MATERIAL AT
RESIDENTIAL PATIOSLANDSCAPE MATERIAL
BETWEEN RESIDENTIAL
PATIOS
ALUMINUM AND GLASS
GUARDRAIL
ALUMINIUM AND TRANSLUCENT
GLASS PRIVACY SCREEN9
9
1011
10 11
78
Materials, Modulation & Interco
Transition Between Resi-dence and Street
Widened landscaping intergrated with par-
tial screens at residential patios provide a
deensible and semi-private
space without complete enicing
Streetscape Compatability
A-6
A-2
32
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
36/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
BLOCK SCALE PERSPECTIVE
N
Board Direction #2 & #4 B-1 Street Level Views with Context, North Wall and Bulk Analysis (EDG Priorities and Board Recommendations A-2, B-1, C-1, C-2)
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
37/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
HARVARDAVENUEE
BROADWAYAVENUE E N
STREET LEVEL VIEWS AND C
STREET LEVEL VIEW AND CONTEXT - HARVARD AVENUE EAST LOOKING SOUTH STREET LEVEL VIEW AND CONTEXT - HARVARD AVENUE EAST LOOKING NORTH
EDG Board Direction #2 C
34
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
38/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
R ADWAYAVENUE E
EMERCERSTREET
N
STREET LEVEL VIEWS AND CONTEXT
EDG Board Direction #2 C-2, D-6, A-6
STREET LEVEL VIEW - HARVARD AVENUE EAST LOOKING WEST
Architectural concept and
consistency
Mulholland cornice datumcontinued across proposed acade
as a resessed balcony
C-2
Entrances visible rom street
vertical "blue block" with projecting
balconies annouce the building entry
and public space rom a distance
A-3
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
39/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
BR ADWAYAVENUE E
MER
ER
TREET
N
STREET LEVEL VIEWS AND C
STREET LEVEL VIEW - HARVARD AVENUE EAST LOOKING NORTHWEST
EDG Board Direction #2 C
Architectural concept and
consistency
"Yellow and blue blocks" parallel
to the street maintaing consistant,
well dened street edges estab-lished by surrounding buildings
C-2
Entrances visible rom street
vertical "blue block" with project-
ing balconies annouce the building
entry and public space rom a dis-
tance
A-3
36
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
40/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
NR ADWAYAVENUE E
EMERCERSTREET
STREET LEVEL VIEWS AND CONTEXT
EDG Board Direction #2 C-2, D-6, A-6
STREET LEVEL VIEW - HARVARD AVENUE EAST LOOKING SOUTHWEST
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
41/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
R ADWAYAVENUE E
MER
ER
TREET
N
STREET LEVEL VIEWS AND C
EDG Board Direction #2 C
STREET LEVEL VIEW - HARVARD AVENUE EAST LOOKING NORTHWEST (VIEW FROM THE JOULE)
38
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
42/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
BR ADWAYAVENUE E
EMERCERSTREET
STREET LEVEL VIEWS AND CONTEXT
EDG Board Direction #2 C-2, D-6, A-6
STREET LEVEL VIEW - HARVARD AVENUE EAST
N
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
43/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
R ADWAYAVENUE
MER
ER
TREET
N
STREET LEVEL VIEWS AND C
EDG Board
PEDESTRIAN VIEW - HARVARD AVENUE EAST - LOOKING NORTH
Architectural concept and
consistency
Transition between residence
and street
Respect or adjacent sites
Entrances visible rom street
vertical "blue block" with project-
ing balconies annouce the building
entry and public space rom a dis-
tance
SE corner o acade angled away
rom south neighbor
"Yellow block" parallel to the street
maintaing consistant, well dened
street edges established by sur-
rounding buildings
C-2
A-6
A-5
A-3
40
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
44/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
NBR ADWAYAVENUE E
EMERCERSTREET
STREET LEVEL VIEWS AND CONTEXT
EDG Board Direction #2 C-2, D-6, A-6
STREET LEVEL VIEW - HARVARD AVENUE EAST, RESIDENTIAL PATIOS
Transition between
residence and street
widened landscaping intergrat-
ed with partial heightr screens
at residential patios provide a
sense o security and privacy
without completly enicing o
the patio rom the street
A-6
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
45/65
42
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
46/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
B-1; EDG Board Direction #4 - North Wall Modulation Analysis
CAMELOT
SURFACE PARKING BELOW
CAMELOT
SURFACE PARKING BELOW
HARVARDAVENUE E
R ADWAYAVENUE E
View from East Mercer
Street looking south
Shadow Diagrm - North Wall noon sun; March 21st -
Without Elevator Penthouse
Shadow Diagrm - North Wall noon sun; March 21st -
With Elevator Penthouse
North Wall Axonometric
Respect or Adjacent
Sites
Respect or Adjacent Sites
A-5
A-5
North acade reduce
multiple, smaller scale
buildings relating to a
cent neighbors
north acade living and dinning rooms o
units ronting surace parking lot to the
north rather than directly opposite adjacent
neighbors
elevator penthouse near north acade does not add additional
shadow to adjacent property walls but minimal shadow to its
rootop
Height, Bulk and Sca
CompatabilityB-1
Height, Bulk and
CompatabilityB-1
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
47/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
B-1; EDG Board Direction #4 - South Wall Modulation
SURFACE PARKING
MULHOLLANDGLEN ARMS`AYA TERRACE
SURFACE PARKING
MULHOLLAND
GLEN ARMS
-
MULHOLLAND
GLEN ARMS
HARVARD AVENUEE
R ADWAYAVENUE E
View from East Republican
Street looking North
South Wall Axonometric
Respect or Adjacent SitesA-5
South acade re
tiple, smaller sc
relating to adjace
South Facade living and dinning rooms o units
ronting surace parking lot to the south rather than
directly opposite adjacent neighbors
South acade mirroring massing concepts along
Harvard Ave with verticle bays
C-2 Architectural Concept and Consistency
44
Glen Arm east windows completely obsured
b d i t i ll
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
48/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
Adjacent Windows and Privacy - WEST SIDE YARD
EDG Board Direction #1 C-2,D-6 & A-6
patios dened by pand privacy screens
oblique views to adjace
balconies recessed and con-
tained in building rame obsur-
ing oblique sight lines
west acade treated with same im-
portance as the ront yard to the east;
sideyard averaging and modulation
adds texture and a smaller scale relat-ing to Glen Arms
42" H translucent guardrails
obsure views to and rom adj
windows
occupiable balcony acing
south, toward parking lot
windows and doors recessed
urther than the 7'-0" setback
and is greater than adj. Prop-
erty's 7'-8" non compliant rear
yard setback
proposed wood slat s
hides exisitng chainli
adjacent property wil
vide privacy i chain
removed
residential terrace b
with landscaping to sc
provide privacy
Respect or Adjac
Sites
View o exisitng
side yard photo
Respect or Adjac
Sites
Bedroom w/
corner view
Respect or Adjacent
Sites
Architectural Concept and
Consistency
Respect or Adja
Sites
landscaping to a
special site cond
Existing West Side Yard / Rear Yard
of Glen Arms
Ground level - west side yard / rear yard of Glen Arms
levels 02 - 03 - west side yard partial plan
West Eelvation w/ Glen Arms in Foreground
E-3
A-5
A-5
A-5
A-5
A-5
C-2
LIV LIV
KITKIT
KITKIT
BR
BR
BR
BRB
B
A-5
by proposed screening or exterior walls
Glen Arm east windows partially obsured by
proposed translucent guardrails
Glen Arm east windows opposite proposed
windows
Respect or Adjacent Sites
Glen Arms windows rom occupiable spac-
es are either ullly or paritally obsured rom
direct opposing views rom proposed win-
dows.
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
49/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
Adjacent Windows and Privacy - WEST S
EDG Board Direction #1 C
patios with planting and privacy s
obsure oblique views to adjacent u
proposed wood slat ence hide
chainlink on adjacent property an
vide privacy i ever the chainlink is
Respect or Adjacent Sites
Respect or Adjacent Sites
Section through rear yard of Glen Armsnote: this Section cut has very minimal overlap with opposing windows.
See plans and elevations for extent of exposure.
View of West Side Yard Looking SouthA-5
BR
BR
BR
42" H translucent guardrails
obsure views to and rom
adj windows above eye level
A-5
46
Respect or Adja
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
50/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
location o cae stotoilet room increase
the north, mitigate s
light
minimal opposing
between buildings
w/ ground level land
minimal opposing windows
between buildings (proposed
bedroom opposite circulation
space
majority o windows
ing spaces opposite
ing - not adjacent to the north
enhanced landscap
moval o overgrow
trees to adj propert
ing character o entr
natural daylight to l
Respect or Ad
Sites
Respect or Ad
Sites
Respect or Adjacent
Sites
Respect or Adja
Sites
Respect or Adjacent
Sites
Existing North Side Yard of Camelot Apartments
at Harvard Avenue East Looking West
Existing North Side Yard of Camelot Apartments
at Harvard Avenue East Looking West - mid block
Adjacent Windows and Privacy - NORTH SIDE YARD
A-5
A-5
A-5
A-5
A-5 E-3
North Eelvation w/ Camelot Apartments in
foreground
NE corner - Level 01NE corner - Level 02 - 03
View o exisitng
side yard photo
c a e
View o exisitng
side yard photo
p a r k i n g 1
story below
C a m e l o tC a m e l o t living /dining
living /
dining
living /dining
living /
diningk i t
k i tk i t
k i tc i r c
c i r c
evelvator core setback; inrequent
public nature
privacy screening and landscape
buering to soten edge at Camelot\
retaining wall
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
51/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
Adjacent Windows and Privacy - SOUTH S
Existing South Side Yard of Mulholland Apartments
at Harvard Avenue East Looking West
Existing South Side Yard of Mulholland Apartments
at Harvard Avenue East Looking East
South Eelvation w/ Mulholland in Foreground
View o exisitng
side yard photoView o exisitng
side yard photo
Respect o
Sites
Respect o
Sites
Respect o
Sites
A-5
A-5
A-5
minimal oppos
between buildin
bedroom oppos
space
egress stair encl
oot trac) oppo
corner window
toward street, a
Mulholland corn
Levels 02 -03 South Side Yard Mulholland Apartments
Levels 02 -03 South Side Yard Mulholland Apartments
Ground Level - South Side Yard Mulholland Apartments
LIVLIV LIVLIV KITKIT BRBR C
C
C
C
C
C
48
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
52/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
Partial FloCOURTYARD ENTRY AND THROUGH BLOCK LINK
EDG Board Direction #5 D-1, A-7
open public space activated by cae residential
lobby interconnected to the open court and cae
with operable doors
entries to the cae and building are shared
by the outdoor court; this court expands
to connect the lobby and cae.
special material treatment on the south
wall and the exposed concrete columns
reinorce the inside-outside pedestrian
connection o the space
Encourage Human ActivityPedestrian Open Spaces and EntrancesArchitectural Context and ConsistencyResidential Open Space A-4D-1C-2A-7
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
53/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
Enlarged Section Axon through Entry Court, Lobby & Residential terrace
Example of a neighborhood cafe
(711 Bellevue Ave.)
Cafe and Lobby Material Concept and Imagery Example of proposed operable doors
interconnecting interior and exterior spaces
COURTYARD ENTRY AND THROUGH BLO
EDG Board Direction
lobby doubles as an extension o
the entry court and caeoutdoor terrace space interconnect-
ed with the residential lobby, open
court and cae by operable doorsacross lenght o wall
Encourage Human ActivityResidential Open Space A-4A-7 A-4D-1
open public spac
by cae. Residenti
lobby interconnecopen court and ca
erable doors
entries to the cae and building
are shared by the outdoor entry
court; this court is expandediconnecting the lobby and court
via operable door
Encourage HumanPedestrian Open Spaces and
Entrances
50
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
54/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
NBROADWAYAVENUE E
EMERCERSTREET
NORTHEAST CORNER AND CAFE DETAILS
EDG Board Direction #6 A-2
HARVARD AVENUE EAST LOOKING WEST
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
55/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
HARVARD AVENUE EAST LOOKING WEST - VIEW OF ENTRY COURT, CAFE ENTRY AND CAFE - LOBBY
COURTYARD ENTRY AND THROUGH BLO
EDG Board Direction
R ADWAYAVENUE E
MER
ER
TREET
52
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
56/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
COURTYARD ENTRY AND THROUGH BLOCK LINK
EDG Board Direction #5 D-1, A-7
NBR ADWAYAVENUE E
EMERCERSTREET
RESIDENTIAL TERRACE - FROM CORNER OF GLEN ARMS
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
57/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
COURTYARD ENTRY AND THROUGH BLO
EDG Board Direction
R ADWAYAVENUE E
EMERCERSTREET
N
RESIDENTIAL TERRACE - FROM NE CORNER OF GLEN ARMS
54
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
58/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
BR ADWAYAVENUE E
ERCERSTREET
EM
NORTHEAST CORNER AND CAFE DETAILS
EDG Board Direction #6 A-2
HARVARD AVENUE EAST LOOKING SOUTHWEST
recessed exterior downlight surace mounted exterior
wall sconceE1 E2
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
59/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
EXTERIOR LIGHTING PLAN AND SIGNAGE C
N0 5 10 20
recessed step light
Signage Concept
Simple door numbers and blade sign or the cae are organized around the
entry court to strengthen the interconnectedness o the spaces.
directional landscape acce
lighting
E1
E3
D-9
E4
E2
E2
E2
E2
E2
E2
E2
E3
E3
E3
E3
E4
E4
E4
E4
E1
E1E1
Shown with CCap
in BronzeWrinkle(BZW) fnish
73/16"(183mm)
Rectilinear
MATERIAL
ALU
VOLTAGE
t7tt
2.7K
CCT
3 K 4 K
56
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
60/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
EAST / WEST SITE SECTION
BROADWAYAVENUE E
MER
ER
TREET
0 4 8 16
EDG Board Direction #3 A-5
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
61/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
0 4 8 16
BROADWAYAVENUE E
NORTH / SOUTH
EDG Board Direction #3 A-5 - S
N
58
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
62/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
CODE
CITATION
DEVELOPMENT
STANDARD REQUIREMENT REQUEST JUSTIFICATION RELEVANT DESIGN GUIDELINES
DRB
PROPOSAL
SMC 23.45.528 Structure width and
depth limits or lots
in Midrise zones
greater than 9,000
square eet in size
The depth o principal structures
shall not exceed 75 percent o the
depth o the lot, except as provided
in subsection 23.45.528.B.2.
Waive structure depth
requirement rom 75% to
approximately 88% o lot
depth
A departure request or an increase in the allowable
structure depth will aord the project greater fexibility
to respond to the intent o the design guidlines and
greater incentive to promote the CIty's workorce housign
incentives.
(See page 60 -61 "Departure #2 - Structure Depth")
Note: this departure request does not impact proximity
to adjacent neighbors and is not requesting a structure tobe deeper than allowed. The intention o the departure is
to promote the intent o SMC 23.45.528.B.2 by providing
meaningul public open space and acade modulation that
allows a structure to be deeper than a simple application o
the code (23.45.528.B.1)
The requested departure better meets and exceeds the d
guidlines listed below
A-4 Encourge Human Activity
A-5 Respect for adjacent Sites
A-6 Transition Between Residence and Street
A-7 Residential Open Space\
C-3 Human Scale
D-1 Pedestrian Open Spaces and Entrances
SMC 23.45.518 Setbacks and
Separations
Table "B"- Front and side setback
rom street lot lines: 7 oot average
setback; 5 oot minimum setback
Waive ront setback
requirement.
A departure request to the min ront setback requirement
o 5'-0" and allow or averaging the acade area to compliy
with the 7'-0" setback. This will aord the project greater
fexibility to orm an open space along Harvard Avenue
E. Project intent is to create a more linear open spacethat expands into a Also note the portion o the code
which allows an no ront setback requirement when an
entry courtyard is provided, but that does not meet the
prescribed dimensions or the entry courtyard in SMC
23.45.518.
(See page 52 "Departure #1 - Min Front setback)
A-6 Transition Between Residence and Street
A-7 Residential Open Space
Incorporate quasi-public open space with new residential
development or redevelopment, with special ocus on corne
landscape treatments and courtyard entries.
Departure Requests
SFBUILDINGAREASWITHINAVERAGESETBACKS
FRONTYARDAMOUNTOFAREAWITHINAVESETBACK
ROOF N/A
LEVEL07 77
If the structure depth departure was granted, how would this proposal meet or exceed the citys design guidelines?
DEPARTURE JUSTIFICATION
The proposal requests maintaining the ave setback o 7'-0." The proposal only asks to reduce the min dimension or ave
rom 5'-0" to 0'-0." The diagrams below indicate the portions o acade set back less than 5'-0" rom the property line.
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
63/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
Departure #1 - Min 5'-0" Front Yard
LEVEL 02 LEVEL 01LEVEL 04LEVELS 05-07 LEVEL 03
LEVEL06 77
LEVEL05 77
LEVEL04 65
LEVEL03 90
LEVEL02 174
LEVEL01 329
TOTALSFAREAOFFAADEWITHINAVERAGESETBACK 247
spirit o SMC 23.45.518, which allows or no ront yard setback, the proposal has generous public open space (see p. at
ground level (see p.17) and signicant setbacks on the foors above to still maintain an average ront setback o s area (2
which is greater than 7'-0" rom the property line. (see total foor area beyond 7t on the chart to the let o this page.)
60
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
64/65
515 Harvard Avenue East
Design Review: Recommendation Proposal
October 23, 201312037
Departure #2 - Structure Depth SMC.23.45.518
DIAGRAM 1 - COMPLIANT STRUCTURE DEPTH
Does not regulate proximity to adjacent neighbors
Departure request does not propose to be closer to neighbors than allowed
Proposal does not request any side yard departures.
23.45.528 STRUCTURE WIDTH AND DEPTH LIMITS FOR LOTS IN MIDRISE ZONES
GREATER THAN 9,000 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE
The width and depth limits of this Section 23.45.528 apply to lots in MR zones that are greater than 9,000
square feet in lot area.
A. The width of principal structures shall not exceed 150 feet.B. Structure depth.
1. The depth of principal structures shall not exceed 75 percent of the depth of the lot, except as
provided in subsection 23.45.528.B.2.
2. Exceptions to structure depth limit. To allow for front setback averaging and courtyards as provided
in Section 23.45.518, structure depth may exceed the limit set in subsection 23.45.528.B.1 if the total lot
coverage resulting from the increased structure depth does not exceed the lot coverage that would have
otherwise been allowed without use of the courtyard or front setback averaging provisions.
DIAGRAM 2 - COMPLIANT STRUCTURE DEPTH
Does not limit depth of structure
SMC.23.45.528.b.2 allows a structure to exceed the allowed depth i the courtyard provision is met and the building
ootprint does not increase more than determined i there was not courtyard or ront yard averageing.
THEREFORE, IF AREA 'A' (diagram 1) = AREA 'B' W/ COURTYARD (diagram 2); then STRUCTURE
DEPTH IS COMPLIANT - NO DEPARTURE REQUIRED
CONCLUSION:Diagram 1 demonstrates this code does not regulate a structure rom being too close to its neighbors.
Diagram 2 demonstrates SMC.23.45.528 allows a deeper structure than 75% o the lot depth, provied a generous
modulation and public open space to the ront yard. The departure request ollows this intent to allow or a deeper
structure than 75% o the lot depth by compensating via meaningul public space and modulation to the rontacade. (See Diagram 3 on p. 57)
operable doors and windows between the sidew
the outdoor entry court, activated by the lobby a
ampifes the residential open space and the ped
environment
A-6
A-7
7/27/2019 Dr Proposal 3013291 Agenda Id 4602
65/65
515 Harvard A
Design Review: Recommendati
Octo
Departure #2 - Structure Depth SMC
Does the departure request: better meet or exceed the intent of design guidelines than a design that simply meets
Land Use Code. - p. iv Design Review: Guidelines for Multifamily and Commercial Buildings.
TRANSITION BETWEEN RESIDENCE AND STREET
ENCOURAGE HUMAN ACTIVITY
expression o the concrete rame; translucent
balconies and acade modulation provide human
to the pedestrian experiance
increased setback along Harvard Avenue East w
landscaping and parially screened patio areas so
the transition between residences and the street
operable doors and windows between the sidew
and cae and between the cae and lobby streng
integration between the residence and public
the outdoor court, activated by the lobby and res
amenity space adds to the residential open spac
pedestrian environment
operable sliding doors to the outdoor court, activ
the lobby and residential amenity space continue
pedestrian experance through the site
RESIDENTIAL OPEN SPACE
HUMAN SCALE
PEDESTRIAN OPEN SPACES AND ENTRANCESA-6
A-4
A-6
A-7
A-7
C-3
C-3
D-1
D-1
D-1
A 6
A-6
DIAGRAM 3- STRUCTURE DEPTH DEPAR TURE REQUESTJustification to "better meet or exceed the intent of design guidlines."
1. The depture request promotes generous, public open space intended or gathering along the street that
encourages human activity.
2. The size o the proposed outdoor entry court exceeds the area required by SMC 23.45.528.b.2 This area
extends into and through the enlarged residentail lobby. The lobby is intened to be shared between the court
and cae. This area exceeds the resultant area in diagram 2. whose structure depth complies with the code
without the need or a departure.
3. The proposed departure request does not increase or aect proximity to neighbors.
4. The proposed departure request better aligns with the City's values to increase density in the MR zone
through the Workorce Housing Incentive. A strict interpetation o SMC 23.45.528 contradicts increasingdensity and discourages modulation.
5. Specifc design guidlines the departure request promotes:
encourage human activityA-4
encourage human activityA-4