Upload
lyque
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
October 14, 2016
SCHOOL:Oakview Elementary School
PRINCIPAL: Heidi Jenkins
School Leadership Team MembersName PositionHeidi Jenkins PrincipalJanis Heller Instructional FacilitatorGaynor Fitzgerald School Counselor/PBIS LeadNancy Blomdahl 4th Grade PLC LeadMichael Kennish 5th Grade PLC LeadLeilani Harmon 6th Grade PLC LeadMelissa Sikel Behavioral RTI LeadBambi Donahue Support Staff LeadKelli Erb Parent Representative/PTO PresidentTBD Special Education PLC Lead
2016-17
2016-17 Centralia School District Improvement Plan
October 14, 2016Ia. DATA: Summary of State Test Results
Use this page to insert a summary of state test results including ELA, math, and science (if applicable) with a state comparison. Include subgroups: All, Hispanic, ELL, Special Education, and low Socioeconomic.
2016-17
* Primary Source: OSPI Report Card* Secondary Source: Online Reporting System (ORS)
ELA Same Grade Level, Multiple Years
All & Subgroups
October 14, 2016
2016-17
* Primary Source: OSPI Report Card* Secondary Source: Online Reporting System (ORS)
Math Same Grade Level, Multiple Years
All & Subgroups
October 14, 2016
2016-17
ALL Hispanic ELL SPED Low Socio
49.744.8
21.1
29.2
42.6
57
38.8
20.624.9
40.246.1
36.6
2015
40.2
60.1
42.2
18.824.5
43.541.1
20
0
25
38.5
56.6
37.7
11
18
39.3
ELA Oakview compared to State
2015 - 2016
OV 4th State 4th OV 5th State 5th OV 6th State 6th
ALL Hispanic ELL SPED Low Socio
51.6
41.4
21.1
37.5
46.7
55.4
37.5
24.3 26
38.9
29.7
17.113.3
5
22.7
49.2
30.7
15.118.7
32.534.1
25.7 27.331.3 30.8
48
28.8
9.313.1
30.5
MATHOakview compared to State
2015 - 2016
OV 4th State 4th OV 5th State 5th OV 6th State 6th
October 14, 2016
2016-17
5th Grade Science MSPYear Oakview State2013 - 2014 68% 66.8%2014 - 2015 62.7% 63.4%2015 - 2016 51.9% 65.3%
October 14, 2016
Ib. Data Summary
1. Using all the assessment data available at your school (more than just the statewide assessment data), write a narrative which summarizes your student achievement results. Which groups of students are doing well at your school in ELA, Math and Science (if applicable)? Which groups are your lowest performing students? Which strands within ELA, Math or Science is the most improvement needed?ELA Strand Data AnalysisPrioritized. First listed is the lowest performing strand, last listed is strongest performance strand
4th 5th 6thSummary
Strands listed with lowest-performing first
SBA Data- Performance by Claim/Target
Reading: Info & Literary Key Details Central Ideas Word Meanings Language Use
Writing: Editing
Research/Inquiry
Reading: Info & Literary Key Details Central Ideas Word Meanings Language Use
Writing: Editing
Writing: ExplanatoryWriting: ArgumentWriting: Narrative
Reading: Info & Literary Key Details Central Ideas Word Meanings Language Use
Writing: Editing
Writing: ExplanatoryWriting: Argument
Lowest to Highest Performance:* Reading: Info & Literary
Key Details Central Ideas Word Meanings Language Use
* Writing: Editing* Writing: Explanatory* Writing: Argument*Writing: Narrative* Research & Inquiry
iReady Data - Needs Analysis by Domain
Comprehension: InformationVocabularyComprehension: LiteraturePhonics
VocabularyComprehension: InformationComprehension: LiteraturePhonics
VocabularyComprehension: InformationComprehension: LiteraturePhonics
Lowest to Highest Performance:* Vocabulary* Comprehension: Information* Comprehension: Literature* Phonics
Summary of Strand Analysis:All iReady domains align with Vocabulary and Comprehension: Information as top areas of need with Comprehension: Literature in third place.This aligns with SBA claim/target data identifying Reading: Information and Reading: Literary as top priorities. Additionally, the Reading subskills of Word Meanings and Language Use include academic and domain-specific vocabulary which aligns with iReady Vocabulary domain. In order to prioritize efforts towards highest need and highest impact actions, Reading Comprehension: Informational & Literary and Vocabulary will be the two focus areas for ELA SIP.
2016-17
October 14, 2016
Math Strand Data AnalysisPrioritized. First listed is the lowest performing strand, last listed is strongest performance strand
4th 5th 6thSummary
Strands listed with lowest-performing first
SBA Data- Performance by Claim/Target
Problem Solving and Modeling & Data Analysis
Communicating Reasoning
Concepts & Procedures
Communicating Reasoning
Problem Solving and Modeling & Data Analysis
Concepts & Procedures
Communicating Reasoning
Problem Solving and Modeling & Data Analysis
Concepts & Procedures
Lowest to Highest Performance:
* Communicating Reasoning* Problem Solving and
Modeling & Data Analysis* Concepts & Procedures
iReady Data - Needs Analysis by Domain
Number and Operations
Geometry
Measurement and Data
Algebra & Algebraic Thinking
Geometry
Algebra & Algebraic Thinking
Numbers and Operations
Measurement and Data
Geometry
Algebra & Algebraic Thinking
Number and Operations
Measurement and Data
Lowest to Highest Performance:* Geometry* Algebra & Algebraic Thinking* Numbers and Operations* Measurement and Data
Summary of Strand Analysis:The SBA strands of Communicating Reasoning and Problem Solving/Modeling & Data Analysis align most closely with iReady foundational strands of Algebra & Algebraic Thinking and Numbers & Operations. According to iReady recommendations, students must master foundational strands before others. Furthermore, 4th grade was Oakview’s highest performing grade level in math whereas 5th and 6th were areas of significant challenge in math, so prioritizing needs of these grade levels is appropriate. For these reasons, Oakview SIP will target the iReady domains of Algebra & Algebraic Thinking and Number & Operations.
2016-17
October 14, 2016II. Academic Action Plan: Each school will write goals for academic achievement areas. Primary level will write goals on 3rd grade ELA and math. Intermediate will write goals on 5th grade science, 6th grade ELA, and 6th grade Math. Middle school will write goals on 8th grade science, ELA, and math. High school will write goals on 10th grade science, 11th grade ELA and math.
A.Content Area: ELA Grade level: 6thStudent Achievement Goal (SMART GOAL):
46% of current 6th grade students met standard on the 5th grade Spring 2016 ELA Smarter Balanced Assessment. By Spring of 2017, 54% of sixth grade students will reach proficiency or above on the Spring 2017 ELA Smarter Balanced Assessment.
ACTION PLAN RESOURCESSIP ActionsExamples:Specific instructional strategies.
Professional Development: How will you increase staff capacity to implement this strategy?
System or process changes / improvements: PLC, data collection, use of time, monitoring plan, etc.
Assess Progress: Formative and Summative Measures
1. Implementation: what approaches will be used by instructional leaders to assure the strategy is implemented (e.g., classroom learning walks, monitoring strategies, grade level discussions, lesson plan review).
2. Desired Student Outcomes: specific assessments, assignments and other indicators of student success
Person (s) Responsible:
Be specific (.i.e, PLC leads, principal, instructional facilitator, etc.)
Resources Needed:
How will you align your resources (people, time, dollars, materials, and partnerships) to accomplish your goals?
Implementation Timeline
Many initiatives will take more than one year. Break initiative into multiple “phases” if necessary.
11Grade Level PLCs and any staff working with students (e.g. intervention paras, Special Education staff, etc.) will use iReady diagnostic and growth-monitoring assessment data as well as iReady teacher-led instruction and individual student online lessons to increase student achievement in VOCABULARY. Special emphasis will be given to the two subcategories listed
Implementation: Grade levels teams will develop instructional
collective commitments (as part of a data inquiry cycle) for each bullet point in first column (e.g. iReady pdf lessons linked to individual student profile recommendations) based on ongoing analysis of iReady data.
Teachers will ensure every student completes iReady diagnostics three times this year within district assessment windows.
Grade level teams will collectively commit to administering related SBA practice and interim assessments
All below-level students will receive 45
PLC Leads – lead team instructional planning and data cycles
Instructional Facilitator & District Coaches – coach PLCs, assist with data, identify resources, deliver related PD
Leadership Team
iReady - program
iReady –training and PD
PLC time
Para-ed Collaboration & Training
Language Use & Word
Language Use – Data cycles coordinated with CSD curriculum map
Word Meanings – Data cycles coordinated with CSD curriculum map
Instruction in both vocab areas of focus prioritized all year.
2016-17
October 14, 2016below.(iReady & SBA domains)
1) Language Useo Figurative languageo Nuances of wordso Impact of word
choice on meaning
2) Word Meanings o iReady & SBA
vocabulary lists for academic and domain-specific vocabulary
o Greek/Latin rootso Vocabulary across
content areas taught in context (Science & Math)
minutes per week in their area of need (reading and/or math) of individual online instruction.
Teachers will attend three iReady training sessions.
Summative Measures: “Needs Analysis by Grade Report” after each
diagnostic window (Fall, Winter, Spring) looking for growth in Vocabulary Domain
Formative Measures: Progress monitoring by class with
“Instructional Grouping Profile” and “Growth Monitoring” reports looking for growth in Vocabulary Domain
– Monitor progress of SIP
Principal – monitor progress, collect evidence
Meanings Instructional Resources & Materials
2016-17
October 14, 2016Grade Level PLCs and any staff working with students (e.g. intervention paras, Special Education staff, etc.) will use iReady diagnostic and growth-monitoring assessment data as well as iReady teacher-led instruction and individual student online lessons to increase student achievement in READING COMPREHENSION – Literary & Informational. Special emphasis will be given to the two subcategories listed below.(iReady & SBA domains)
1) Key Detailso Using details to
support inferences or conclusions (L/I)
2) Central Ideaso Determine central
ideas (L/I)o Summarize text (L/I)
Implementation: Grade levels teams will develop instructional
collective commitments (as part of a data inquiry cycle) for each bullet point in first column (e.g. iReady pdf lessons linked to individual student profile recommendations) based on ongoing analysis of iReady data.
Teachers will ensure every student completes iReady diagnostics three times this year within district assessment windows.
Grade level teams will collectively commit to administering related SBA practice and interim assessments
All below-level students will receive 45 minutes per week in their area of need (reading and/or math) of individual online instruction.
Summative Measures: “Needs Analysis by Grade Report” after each
diagnostic window (Fall, Winter, Spring) looking for growth in both Comprehension Domains
Formative Measures: Progress monitoring by class with
“Instructional Grouping Profile” and “Growth Monitoring” reports looking for growth in both Comprehension Domains
PLC Leads – lead team instructional planning and data cycles
Instructional Facilitator & District Coaches – coach PLCs, assist with data, identify resources, deliver related PD
Leadership Team – Monitor progress of SIP
Principal – monitor progress, collect evidence
iReady - program
iReady –training and PD
PLC time
Para-ed Collaboration & Training
Key Details & Central Ideas Instructional Resources & Materials
Key Details – Data cycles coordinated with CSD curriculum map
Central Ideas – Data cycles coordinated with CSD curriculum map
Instruction in both comprehension areas of focus prioritized all year.
2016-17
October 14, 2016B. Content Area: Math Grade level: 6th GradeStudent Achievement Goal (SMART GOAL):
29.6% of current 6th grade students met standard on the 5th grade Spring 2016 MATH Smarter Balanced Assessment. By Spring of 2017, 48% of sixth grade students will reach proficiency or above on the Spring 2017 ELA Smarter Balanced Assessment.
ACTION PLAN RESOURCESSIP Actions
Examples:Specific instructional strategies tied to your problem of practice.
Professional Development: How will you increase staff capacity to implement this strategy with fidelity?
System or process changes / improvements: PLC, data collection, use of time, monitoring plan, etc.
Assess Progress: Formative and Summative Measures
1. Implementation: what approaches will be used by instructional leaders to assure the strategy is implemented (e.g., classroom learning walks, monitoring strategies, grade level discussions, lesson plan review).
2. Desired Student Outcomes: specific assessments, assignments and other indicators of student success
Person (s) Responsible:
Be specific (.i.e, PLC leads, principal, instructional facilitator, etc.)
Resources Needed:
How will you align your resources (people, time, dollars, materials, and partnerships) to accomplish your goals?
Implementation Timeline
Many initiatives will take more than one year. Break initiative into multiple “phases” if necessary.
Grade Level PLCs and any staff working with students (e.g. intervention paras, Special Education staff, etc.) will use iReady diagnostic and growth-monitoring assessment data as well as iReady teacher-led instruction and individual student online lessons to increase student achievement in ALGEBRA & ALGEBRAIC THINKING. Special emphasis will be given to the points listed below.(iReady domain that encapsulates Concepts & Procedures SBA Claim/Target)
Implementation: Grade levels teams will develop instructional
collective commitments (as part of a data inquiry cycle) for each bullet point in first column (e.g. iReady pdf lessons linked to individual student profile recommendations) based on ongoing analysis of iReady data.
Teachers will ensure every student completes iReady diagnostics three times this year within district assessment windows.
Grade level teams will collectively commit to administering related SBA practice and interim assessments
School-wide fluency practice All below-level students will receive 45
PLC Leads – lead team instructional planning and data cycles
Instructional Facilitator & District Coaches – coach PLCs, assist with data, identify resources, deliver related
iReady - program
iReady –training and PD
PLC time
Para-ed Collaboration & Training
Algebra & Algebraic Thinking
Data cycles coordinated with CSD curriculum maps
Instruction in areas of focus prioritized all year.
Mastery of skills in areas of focus prioritized and revisited all year until all students
2016-17
October 14, 2016o Factors & Multipleso Mult./Division Fluencyo Algebraic expressions
minutes per week in their area of need (reading and/or math) of individual online instruction.
Summative Measures: “Needs Analysis by Grade Report” after each
diagnostic window (Fall, Winter, Spring) looking for growth in Algebra & Algebraic Thinking Domain
Formative Measures: Progress monitoring by class with
“Instructional Grouping Profile” and “Growth Monitoring” reports looking for growth in Algebra & Algebraic Thinking Domain
PD
Leadership Team – Monitor progress of SIP
Principal – monitor progress, collect evidence
Instructional Resources & Materials
show adequate progress.
Grade Level PLCs and (e.g. intervention paras, Special Education staff, etc.) will use iReady diagnostic and growth-monitoring assessment data as well as iReady teacher-led instruction and individual student online lessons to increase student achievement in NUMBERS & OPERATIONS. Special emphasis will be given to the points listed below.(iReady Domain that encapsulates Concepts & Procedures SBA Claim/Target)
o Number – Base Teno Number – Fractions &
Decimalso Operations – Add, Subtract,
Multiply, Divide multi-digit
Implementation: Grade levels teams will develop instructional
collective commitments (as part of a data inquiry cycle) for each bullet point in first column (e.g. iReady pdf lessons linked to individual student profile recommendations) based on ongoing analysis of iReady data.
Teachers will ensure every student completes iReady diagnostics three times this year within district assessment windows.
Grade level teams will collectively commit to administering related SBA practice and interim assessments
All below-level students will receive 45 minutes per week in their area of need (reading and/or math) of individual online instruction.
Summative Measures: “Needs Analysis by Grade Report” after each
PLC Leads – lead team instructional planning and data cycles
Instructional Facilitator & District Coaches – coach PLCs, assist with data, identify resources, deliver related PD
Leadership Team – Monitor
iReady - program
iReady –training and PD
PLC time
Para-ed Collaboration & Training
Numbers & OperationsInstructional Resources & Materials
Data cycles coordinated with CSD curriculum maps
Instruction in areas of focus prioritized all year.
Mastery of skills in areas of focus prioritized and revisited all year until all students show adequate progress.
2016-17
October 14, 2016numbers
o Operations – Add, Subtract, Multiply, Divide multi-step problems
diagnostic window (Fall, Winter, Spring) looking for growth in Numbers & Procedures Domain
Formative Measures: Progress monitoring by class with
“Instructional Grouping Profile” and “Growth Monitoring” reports looking for growth in Numbers & Procedures Domain
progress of SIP
Principal – monitor progress, collect evidence
2016-17
October 14, 2016C.Content Area: Science Grade level: 5th GradeStudent Achievement Goal (SMART GOAL):
By Spring 2017, 58% of fifth grade students will meet or exceed standard on the Science MSP
ACTION PLAN RESOURCESSIP Actions
Examples:Specific instructional strategies tied to your problem of practice.
Professional Development: How will you increase staff capacity to implement this strategy with fidelity?
System or process changes / improvements: PLC, data collection, use of time, monitoring plan, etc.
Assess Progress: Formative and Summative Measures
1. Implementation: what approaches will be used by instructional leaders to assure the strategy is implemented (e.g., classroom learning walks, monitoring strategies, grade level discussions, lesson plan review).
2. Desired Student Outcomes: specific assessments, assignments and other indicators of student success
Person (s) Responsible:
Be specific (.i.e, PLC leads, principal, instructional facilitator, etc.)
Resources Needed:
How will you align your resources (people, time, dollars, materials, and partnerships) to accomplish your goals?
Implementation Timeline
Many initiatives will take more than one year. Break initiative into multiple “phases” if necessary.
All teachers will learn and teach NGSS Scientific Practices for grades 4-6 with special emphasis on inquiry-based learning and STEM instruction.
Implementation: All grade level team teams will commit to
60 – 90 minutes of science instruction weekly
All grade level teams will collectively commit to administering related MSP and/or NGSS practice tests if and/or when available
XLT STEM, Robotics Club, STEM Classroom Challenges
Measurement:
PLC Leads – lead team instructional planning and data cycles
Instructional Facilitator, XLT Cert Lead, & District Coaches – coach PLCs, assist with data, identify resources, coordinate before and after school activities
PLC time
Science Inquiry, Scientific Process, and STEM Resources & Materials
NGSS Training & Support
MSP Science
All grade levels will complete one full science unit including at least one scientific process each grading period.
2016-17
October 14, 2016 Grade Level Science Leads will introduce
sample lessons and district science committee work and suggestions to teachers.
Grade Level PLCs will pilot lessons and give feedback to Science Leads.
Leadership Team – Monitor progress of SIP
Principal – monitor progress, collect evidence, collaborate with Nicoe
formatted practice activities and assessments
2016-17
October 14, 2016III. Professional Development Plan: Use the space below or attach a separate document. The plan should align with your SIP, other school or district initiatives requiring PD, and reflect the components of effective PD. Please summarize all CEA and early release Fridays (if available) within the plan as well.
2016-17 Professional Development Planning – Use of CEA DaysDays Elementary Secondary Building Your Plan1 ….Teacher Directed…. Not available for PD1 ….Teacher Directed…. Not available for PD1 ….Teacher Directed…. Not available for PD1 ….Teacher Directed…. Not available for PD1 ….Teacher Directed…. Not available for PD1 ….Teacher Directed…. Not available for PD1 ….Teacher Directed…. Not available for PD1 ….Teacher Directed…. Not available for PD1 ….Teacher Directed…. Not available for PD1 ….Teacher Directed…. Not available for PD.5 .5 Superintendent’s Day
9/1/16: ½ Superintendent, ½ Building Not available for PD
1 K-6 Literacy DayOV Library & ClassroomsAugust 30 @ 8:00-3:30
Building Principals – be aware of need to plan w/ your literacy reps (they will need PD time to complete their plan)
Elementary-Not available for building PD
Secondary - ?Not all staff involved
1 Data DayOV LibraryAugust 31 @ 8:00-3:30
1TRI1
iReadyOV/WA Libraries3 Trainings – 9/13/16,
Elementary not available for PD Secondary - ? not all staff involved
1TRI2
“Lit Tuesdays” Building Literacy PDOV Library @ Tuesdays 3:25 – 4:25October – March (7hrs)
1TRI3
DataWise PLCsBuilding PDOV Library @ Tuesdays 3:25 – 4:25October – March (7hrs)
2016-17
October 14, 20161TRI4
OTHER*TENTATIVE* October 14th – ½ ELP; ½ PLC*TENTATIVE* Make-up day later in SY
16 Total
2 Hour Early Dismissal Friday PDDate Elementary
9-30-16 DataWise – Defining the Improvement Process (DW #1-3) Using our data for SIP, GL & SG Goals (DW #4)
10-28-16 District: Active Shooter Training 1-27-17 DataWise –
SIP & SGGs Midyear Review
2-24-17 iReady(?) * Will use swapped TRI time elsewhere for same as 3-24-17 (see below)3-24-17 SBA Preparation and Proctor Training
TPEP Evidence for PG & SG GoalsPBIS
4-28-17 Math Adoption PD (Bldg)PBIS
5-26-17 Math Adoption PD (Bldg)PBIS
2016-17