dshe.portal.gov.bddshe.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/dshe.portal... · Web viewSYLHET TOTAL Table 58: Zone wise performance of schools as per Indicator 7 and Sub-Indicator

Zone -wise ranking as per PBM ISAS criteria and standard

SL. Zones Total Assessed A,B,C %(A,B,C) Ranking (ABC)

1 BARISAL2 CHITTAGONG3 COMILLA4 DHAKA5 KHULNA6 MYMENSHING7 RAJSHAHI8 RANGPUR9 SYLHET

Zone -wise D & E category institution as per PBM ISAS criteria and standard

SL. Zones Total Assessed D,E %(D, E)

1 BARISAL2 CHITTAGONG3 COMILLA4 DHAKA5 KHULNA6 MYMENSINGH7 RAJSHAHI8 RANGPUR9 SYLHET

TOTAL

PBM ISAS Indicator-wise score availed by the institutions

SL. No. Indicator

Assessment with %

A % B % C % D % E %

1 Teaching-LearningEnvironment

2 Leadership of HT/ Super

3 Role of SMC/GB

4 Teacher’s Professionalism

5 Student Performance

6 Co-Curricular Activities

7 Institution/Community and Guardian/Teacher Relations

1

Year -wise PBM implementation comparison data of last three years

YearNos. of

Institutions

Assessed Institutions

GradeA %

GradeB

%Grad

eC

% GradeD %

GradeE

%

201620172018

Year- wise PBM implementation comparison data clustering into A, B & C and D & E category

YearNos. of

Institutions

Assessed Institution

sGradeA/B/C % Grade

D/E %

201620172018

Position of zones in three consecutive years as per PBM ISAS ranking

Zone Ranking (as per A/B/C school percentage)Year Year Year

BarisalChittagong

ComillaDhakaKhulna

MymensinghRajshahiRangpurSylhet

Table 1: ISAS Scoring with Institutional Classification.Score Institutional Classification

From To Description Category90% 100% Top Performing A80% 89.9% Well Performing B70% 79.9% Moderate Performing C50% 69.9% Poor Performing D20% 49.9% Non Performing E

Table 1: Zone-wise total number of assessed institution

SN Zone

Number of

District

Number of

Institution

Number of AssessedInstitution

% of AssessedInstitution

1 BARISAL 62 CHITTAGONG 73 COMILLA 44 DHAKA 115 KHULNA 106 MYMENSINGH 67 RAJSHAHI 88 RANGPUR 89 SYLHET 4

TOTAL 64

| 2

Table 2: Zone –wise classification of Institutions

SL. ZoneNumber of Institutions Institution Number as per

Category Percentage as per Category

Total Assessed A B C D E A B C D E


TOTAL

Table 3: Ranking of zones with A, B & C category

SL Zone Total Assessed A,B,C %

(A,B,C)Ranking(A,B,C)

1 BARISAL2 CHITTAGONG3 COMILLA4 DHAKA5 KHULNA6 MYMENSHING7 RAJSHAHI8 RANGPUR9 SYLHET TOTAL

Table 4: Statement on zone -wise D& E category institution

SL Zone Total Assessed D,E %(D,E) Ranking

(D,E)


| 3

Table 5: Indicator-wise institutional performance assessment

SL. No. Indicator

Assessment with %

A % B % C % D % E %



3 Role of SMC/GB




Institution/Community and Guardian/Teacher Relations

Table 6: Zone Wise Performance of Institutions in the area of Teaching Learning Environment. Ind-I

SL.No. Zones Assessed

InstitutionsCategory wise Number of Institution with Percentage

A % B % C % D % E %1 BARISAL2 CHITTAGONG3 COMILLA4 DHAKA5 KHULNA6 MYMENSINGH7 RAJSHAHI8 RANGPUR9 SYLHET

TOTAL

Table 7: Zone wise performance of institutions as per Indicator-1 and SubIndicator-1.1: Minimum classroom space available for each student per shift

SL.No.

Zones

AssessedInstitution

sCategory wise Number of Institution with Percentage


TOTAL

Table 8: Zone wise performance of schools as per indicator 1 and sub-indicator 1.2:Average number of students per class room (section wise)

SL. Zones Assessed Category wise Number of Institution with Percentage

| 4

No.

Institutions A % B % C % D % E %


TOTAL

Table 9: Zone wise performance of schools as per indicator 1 and sub-indicator 1.3: Safe drinking water facilities

SL.No. Zones

AssessedInstitution



TOTAL

Table 10: Zone wise performance of schools as per indicator 1 and sub-indicator 1.4: Availability of furniture for students’ use

SL.No.

Zones

AssessedInstitution



TOTAL

Table 11: Zone wise performance of schools as per indicator 1 and sub-indicator 1.5 : Condition of Library facilities

SL.No. Zones

AssessedInstitution


A % B % C % D % E %

| 5


TOTAL

Table 12: Zone wise performance of schools as per indicator 1 and sub-indicator 1.6:Head of the Institutions office room with shortage of secured facilities for keeping institutional records

SL.No.

Zones

AssessedInstitutions

Category wise Number of Institution with Percentage

A % B % C % D % E %


TOTAL

Table 13: Zone wise performance of schools as per indicator 1 and sub-indicator 1.7 : Condition of teachers’ common room

SL.No.

Zones

AssessedInstitution



TOTAL

Table 14: Zone wise performance of schools as per indicator 1 and sub-indicator 1.8: Condition of toilets

SL.No.

Zones

AssessedInstitution

s

Category wise Number of Institution with PercentageA % B % C % D % E %

| 6


TOTAL

Table 15: Zone wise performance of schools in the area of Head of the Institutions Leadership (Indicator2)

Sl. ZonesAssessed Institution

s



TOTAL

Table 16: Zone wise performance of schools as per indicator 2 and sub indicator 2.1:Head of the institution’s role in developing strategic five years/ annual plan for institutional development

SL.No. Zones

Assessed

Institutions


A % B % C % D % E %

1 BARISAL

2 CHITTAGONG

3 COMILLA4 DHAKA5 KHULNA

6 MYMENSINGH

7 RAJSHAHI8 RANGPUR9 SYLHET

TOTAL

Table 17: Zone wise performance of schools as per indicator 2 and sub indicator 2.2 Head of the institution’s role in discussing with each of the subject teachers regularly regarding teaching-learning

| 7

SL.No.

Zones

AssessedInstitution

s


A % B % C % D % E %


TOTAL

Table 18: Zone wise performance of schools as per indicator 2 and sub indicator 2.3: Head of the institution’s role in organizing full staff meeting

SL.No.

Zones

AssessedInstitution

s



TOTAL

Table 19: Zone wise performance of schools as per indicator 2 and sub indicator 2.4:Head of the institution’s role in organizing formal meetings for subject teachers

SL.No.

Zones

AssessedInstitution



TOTAL

Table 20:Zone wise performance of schools as per indicator 2 and sub indicator 2.5: Head of the institution’s role in facilitating in-service training for the teachers


| 8

No.

Institutions A % B % C % D % E %


TOTAL

Table 21:Zone wise performance of schools as per indicator 2 and sub indicator 2.6:Head of the institution’s role in completion of Annual Performance Evaluation Report (APER) for the teachers

SL.

No

ZonesAssessedInstitution

s


A % B % C % D % E %


TOTAL

Table 22: Zone wise performance of schools as per indicator 2 and sub indicator 2.7: Head of the institution’s role towards professional development

SL.

No

Zones

AssessedInstitution

s


A % B % C % D % E %


TOTAL

Table 23: Zone wise performance of schools as per indicator 2 and sub indicator 2.8: Head of the institution’s awareness about the overall conditions of the Institution

| 9

SL.

No

Zones

AssessedInstitution

s


A % B % C % D % E %


TOTAL

Table 24: Zone wise performance of schools as per indicator 2 and sub indicator 2.9:Head of the institution’s role in collecting and supplying teaching-learning materials

SL.

No

Zones AssessedInstitution



TOTAL

Table 25: Zone wise performance of schools as per indicator 2 and sub indicator 2.10: Head of the Institutions’ role regarding stop gap arrangement in absence of any teacher

SL.

No

Zones

AssessedInstitution

s


A % B % C % D % E %


TOTALTable 26: Zone wise performance of schools as per indicator 2 and sub indicator 2.11:Head of the Institutions’ role in ensuring classes to be held as per teaching-learning days in a year

| 10

SL.No. Zones

AssessedInstitution

s



TOTAL

Table 27: Zone wise performance of schools as per indicator 2 and sub indicator 2.12:Head of the Institutions’ role in ensuring classes to be taken by each of the teachers as per approved teaching periods in a week

SL.No. Zones

AssessedInstitution



TOTAL

Table 28: Zone wise performance of schools in the area of Effectiveness of SMC/GB /Academic Council (Indicator3)

SL.No. Zones Assessed

Institutions


A % B % C % D % E %


TOTALTable 29: Zone wise performance of schools as per Indicator 3 and Sub-indicator 3.1 Involvement of SMC / GB /Academic Council in developing strategic/ institutional annual development plan

| 11

SL.No. Zones

AssessedInstitution



TOTAL

Table 30: Zone wise performance of schools as per Indicator 3 and Sub-indicator 3.2 SMC / GB / AC’s participation in the meetings held onbudget and resource allocation

SL.No. Zones

AssessedInstitution



TOTAL

Table 31: Zone Wise Performance of schools as per Indicator 3 and sub-indicator 3.3 SMC / GB / AC’ s meeting held on student admission, attendance and performance.

SL.No. Zones

AssessedInstitution



TOTAL

Table 32: Zone wise performance of Schools in Teachers’ Professionalism

SL.No.

Zones

AssessedInstitution


| 12

s1 BARISAL2 CHITTAGONG3 COMILLA4 DHAKA5 KHULNA6 MYMENSINGH7 RAJSHAHI8 RANGPUR9 SYLHET

TOTAL

Table 33: Zone wise performance of schools as per Indicator 4 and Sub-Indicator 4.1 Punctuality and attendance of Teacher

SL.No Zones

AssessedInstitution



TOTAL

Table 34: Zone wise performance of schools as per Indicator 4 and Sub-Indicator 4.2 Percentage of Teachers who prepare written lesson plan

SL.No Zones Assessed

Institutions


A % B % C % D % E %


TOTAL

Table 35: Zone wise performance of schools as per Indicator 4 and Sub-Indicator 4.3 Collection and use of local teaching aids by the teachers


| 13

No Institutions A % B % C % D % E %


TOTAL

Table 36: Zone wise performance of schools in Indicator 4 and Sub-Indicator 4.4 Identification and additional support to the low performing students

SL.No Zones

AssessedInstitution



TOTAL

Table 37: Zone wise performance of schools as per Indicator 4 and Sub-Indicator 4.5 Number of teacher who attend and participate in staff meetings regularly

SL.No Zones

AssessedInstitution



TOTAL

Table 38: Zone wise performance of schools as per Indicator 4 and Sub-Indicator 4.6 Number of teacher who attend and participate in subject-based meeting


| 14

No Institutions A % B % C % D % E %


TOTAL

Table 39: Zone wise performance of schools as per Indicator 4 and Sub-Indicator 4.7 Participation of teachers in service teachers’ training

SL.No Zones

AssessedInstitutio

nsCategory wise Number of Institution with Percentage


TOTAL

Table 40: Zone wise performance of schools as per Indicator 4 and Sub-Indicator 4.8 Maintenance of student performance record by the teachers

SL.No Zones

AssessedInstitutio

nsCategory wise Number of Institution with Percentage


TOTAL

| 15

Table 41: Zone wise performance in the area of Student Performance (Ind-5)

SL.No.

Zones Category wise Number of Institution with Percentage

AssessedInstitution

s A % B % C % D % E %


TOTAL

Table 42: Overall Performance of Zones in the area of Student Performance (Ind.-V)SL Zones Total Assesse

dA,B,C %

(A,B,C)D,E %

(D,E)1 BARISAL2 CHITTAGONG3 COMILLA4 DHAKA5 KHULNA6 MYMENSHING7 RAJSHAHI8 RANGPUR9 SYLHET

TOTAL

Table 43: Zone wise performance as per Indicator 5 and Sub-Indicator 5.1 Students’ attendance for minimum of 90% for the scheduled class days in a year

SL.

No ZonesAssessedInstitutio

ns


A % B % C % D % E %


TOTAL

| 16

Table 44: Zone wise performance as per Indicator 5 and Sub-Indicator 5.2 Average number of students that remain absent during the year

SL.

No ZonesAssessedInstitution

s


A % B % C % D % E %


TOTAL

Table 45: Zone wise performance as per Indicator 5 and Sub-Indicator 5.3 Average number of students who repeated in same class

SL.


s


A % B % C % D % E %


TOTAL

Table 46: Zone wise performance as per Indicator 5 and Sub-Indicator 5.4 Average number of students who completed assignments and projects and made continuous progress throughout the year

SL.No Zones

AssessedInstitution



TOTAL

| 17

Table 47: Zone wise performance as per Indicator 5 and Sub-Indicator 5.5 Average number of students those enrolled in Grade-VIII/ X/ XII and sit for the JSC/JDC/SSC/HSC Examinations

SL.

No ZonesAssessedInstitutio

ns


A % B % C % D % E %


TOTAL

Table 48: Zone wise performance as per Indicator 5 and Sub-Indicator 5.6 Pass rate of JSC/JDC/ SSC/HSC Examination similar to or better than SBA/CA Score

SL.


s


A % B % C % D % E %


TOTAL

Table 49: Zone wise performance as per Indicator 5 and Sub-Indicator 5.7 Pass Rate of JSC/JDC/SSC/HSC is similar to or better than the national average

SL.


s


A % B % C % D % E %


TOTAL

| 18

Table 50: Zone wise performance as per Indicator 5 and Sub-Indicator 5.8 Percentage of student those achieved the highest score (A+) in JSC/JDC/ SSC / HSC examinations

SL.


s


A % B % C % D % E %


TOTAL

Table 51: Zone wise performance in the area of Co-curricular Activities (Ind-6)

SL.No.

Zones

AssessedInstitution

s



TOTAL

Table 52: Zone wise performance of schools as per Indicator 6 and Sub-Indicator 6.1 Planning of Co-Curricular Activities

SL.No Zones

AssessedInstitution



TOTAL

| 19

Table 53: Zone wise performance of schools as per Indicator6 and Sub-Indicator6.2 Implementation of co-curricular activitiesSL.No Zones

AssessedInstitution



TOTAL

Table 54: Zone wise performance of schools as per Indicator 6 and Sub-Indicator 6.3 Participation rate of student in co-curricular activitiesSL.No Zones

AssessedInstitution

s



TOTAL

Table 55: Zone wise performance of schools in the area of Teacher and Community/ Guardians Relationships

SL.No.

Zones Category wise Number of Institution with Percentage

AssessedInstitution

s A % B % C % D % E %


TOTAL

| 20

Table 56: Zone wise performance of schools as per Indicator 7 and Sub-Indicator 7.1 Communications between institution and guardiansSL.No Zones

AssessedInstitution



TOTAL

Table 57: Zone wise performance of schools as per Indicator 7 and Sub-Indicator 7.2 Invitation of guardians to attend the meetings on student progress

SL.No Zones

AssessedInstitution



TOTAL

Table 58: Zone wise performance of schools as per Indicator 7 and Sub-Indicator 7.3 Communications between institution and community groupsSL.No Zones

AssessedInstitution



TOTAL

Table 59: Districts of Barisal Zone

| 21

Sl. No.

Name of Districts

Nos. of Institution

Institution Nos. as per Category Percentage as per category

Assessed A B C D E A B C D E1 BARGUNA2 BARISAL3 BHOLA4 JHALKATI5 PATUAKHALI6 PIROJPUR

TOTAL

Table 61: Districts of Chittagong Zone

Sl. No.

Name of Districts

Nos. of Institution


Assessed A B C D E A B C D E1 CHITTAGONG2 RANGAMATI3 kHAGRACHARI4 BANDARBAN5 NOAKHALI6 FENI7 COX’S BAZAR

TOTAL

Table 62: Districts of Comilla Zone

Sl. No.

Name of Districts

Nos. of Institution


Assessed A B C D E A B C D E1 Cumilla2 Chandpur3 Brahmanbaria4 Laxmipur

TOTAL

| 22

Table 63: Districts of Dhaka Zone

Sl. No.

Name of Districts

Nos. of Institution


Assessed A B C D E A B C D E1 Dhaka2 Faridpur3 Gazipur4 Gopalganj5 Madaripur6 Manikganj7 Munshiganj

8 Narayanganj

9 Narshindi10 Rajbari11 Shariatpur

TOTAL

Table 64: Districts of Khulna Zone

Sl. No.

Name of Districts

Nos. of Institution


Assessed A B C D E A B C D E1 Bagerhat2 Chuadanga3 Jessore4 Jhenaidah5 Khulna6 Kustia7 Magura8 Meherpur9 Narail

10 SatkhiraTOTAL

Table 65: Districts of Mymensingh Zone

Sl. No.

Name of Districts

Nos. of Institution


Assessed A B C D E A B C D E

1 Mymensingh2 Tangail3 Jamalpur4 Kishoregang5 Netrakona6 Sherpur

TOTAL

| 23

Table 66: Districts of Rajshahi Zone

Sl. No.

Name of Districts

Nos. of Instituti

onInstitution Nos. as per

Category Percentage as per category


1 BOGRA2 CHAPAINAWABGANJ3 JOYPURHAT4 NAOGAON5 NATORE6 PABNA7 RAJSHAHI8 SIRAJGANJ

TOTAL

Table 67: Districts of Rangpur Zone

Sl. No.

Name of Districts

Nos. of Institutio

nInstitution Nos. as per


Assessed A B C D E A B C D E1 Dinajpur2 Gaibandha3 Kurigram4 Lalmonirhat5 Nilphamari6 Ponchagorh7 Rangpur8 Thaakurgaon

TOTAL

Table 68: Districts of Sylhet Zone

Sl. No.

Name of Districts

Nos. of Instituti

onInstitution Nos. as per



1 Sylhet2 Moulvibazar3 Hobigonj4 Sunamgonj

TOTAL

| 24

Table 69: Zone wise performance of govt. secondary schools as per PBM ISAS criteria and standard

SL Zone

Govt. Inst.

Assessed

Numbers as per category with percentage

A %(A) B %

(B) C %(C) D %

(D) E %(E)


Total

Table 70: Zone wise number of girls’ secondary schools as per PBM ISAS criteria and standard

SL Zone

TotalAssesse

dGirls Ins.

Number of schools as per category and in percentage

A%(A) B %(B) C

%(C) D

%(D) E %(E)

1 BARISAL

2 CHITTAGONG

3 COMILLA

4 DHAKA

5 KHULNA

6 MYMENSHING

7 RAJSHAHI

8 RANGPUR

9 SYLHETTotal

Table 71: PBM performance of school situated in Hilly Districts.

DistrictTotal

Assessed

A %(A) B %

(B) C %(C) D %

(D) E %(E)

BANDARBANKHAGRACHARIRANGAMATITOTAL

Table 72: PBM performance of schools situated in Coastal areas.

Sl. No.

Name of

District

Name of

Upazila

Assessed

Inst.

Institution No. as per

CategoryPercentage as per

categoryA B C D E A B C D E

| 25

Sl. No.

Name of

District

Name of

Upazila

Assessed

Inst.




Total

Table 73: PBM performance of schools situated in Haor areas.

Sl. No.

Name of

District

Name of

Upazila

Assessed

Inst.




Total

Table 74: Year wise PBM implementation comparison (Last 3 years)

YearNos. of

Institutions

Assessed Institutions

GradeA %

GradeB

%Grad

eC

% GradeD %

GradeE

%

Table 75: Year wise PBM implementation comparative assessment report: Barisal zone(Last 3 years)

Year

No. of Institutio

n


s

Number of Institution as per categoryA %

(A) B %(B) C %

(C) D %(D) E %

(E)

Table 76: Year wise PBM implementation comparative assessment report: Chittagong zone(Last 3 years)

Year

No. of Institutio

n


s


(A) B %(B) C %

(C) D %(D) E %

(E)

Table 77: Year wise PBM implementation comparative assessment report: Comilla zone(Last 3 years)

Year

No. of Institutio

n


s


(A) B %(B) C %

(C) D %(D) E %

(E)

Table 78: Year wise PBM implementation comparative assessment report: Dhaka zone(Last 3 years)

Year

No. of Institutio

n


s


(A) B %(B) C %

(C) D %(D) E %

(E)

| 26

Table 79: Year wise PBM implementation comparative assessment report: Khulna zone(Last 3 years)

Year

No. of Institutio

n


s


(A) B %(B) C %

(C) D %(D) E %

(E)

Table 80: Year wise PBM implementation comparative assessment report: Mymensingh zone(Last 3 years)

Year

No. of Institutio

n


s


(A) B %(B) C %

(C) D %(D) E %

(E)

Table 81: Year wise PBM implementation comparative assessment report: Rajshahi zone. (Last 3 years)

Year

No. of Institutio

n


s


(A) B %(B) C %

(C) D %(D) E %

(E)

Table 82: Year wise PBM implementation comparative assessment report: Rangpur zone. (Last 3 years)

Year

No. of Institutio

n


s


(A) B %(B) C %

(C) D %(D) E %

(E)

Table 83: Year wise PBM implementation comparative assessment report: Sylhet zone.(Last 3 years)

Year

No. of Institutio

n


s


(A) B %(B) C %

(C) D %(D) E %

(E)

Zone -wise ranking as per PBM ISAS criteria and standard

| 27

SL. Zones Total Assessed A,B,C %(A,B,C) Ranking (ABC)


TOTAL

Zone -wise D & E category institution as per PBM ISAS criteria and standard

SL. Zones Total Assessed D,E %(D, E)


TOTAL

PBM ISAS Indicator-wise score availed by the institutions

SL. No. Indicator

Assessment with %

A % B % C % D % E %



3 Role of SMC/GB




7 Institution/Community and Guardian/Teacher Relations

PBM ISAS Indicator-wise institutional performance clustering into A/B/C and D/E category score

SL. Indicator Assessment with %No. A,B,C % D,E %1 Teaching-Learning

| 28

Environment2 Leadership of HT/ Super3 Role of SMC/GB4 Teacher's Professionalism5 Student Performance6 Co-Curricular Activities7 Institution/Community and

Guardian/Teacher Relations

Year -wise PBM implementation comparison data (Last 3 years)

Year

Nos. of Institutio

ns

Assessed Institutio

ns

GradeA

%Grad

eB

%Grad

eC

%Grad

eD

%Grad

eE

%

Year- wise PBM implementation comparison dataclustering into A, B& C and D&E category (Last 3 years)

YearNos. of

Institutions


sGradeA/B/C % Grade

D/E %

Positions of zones in three consecutive years as per PBM ISAS ranking (Last 3 years)

Zone Ranking (as per A/B/C school percentage)Year 20 Year 20 Year

BarisalChittagong

ComillaDhakaKhulna

MymensinghRajshahiRangpurSylhet

| 29

Zonal Institution Information – Year -

School &School & College

Non-Govt.

Zone Boys Girls Co-education Total

BarisalChittagongCumillaDhakaKhulnaMymensinghRajshahiRangpurSylhet

Total =



Govt.

BarisalChittagongCumillaDhakaKhulnaMymensinghRajshahiRangpurSylhet

Total =



Non-Govt.

All

Govt. AllTotal =

| 30

Year –

Sl. Category Grade TotalA B C D E

1

Govt.

Govt. Boys2 Govt. Girls3 Govt. Co-edu(Combined)4 Govt. Co-edu(Separate)5 Govt. School & College Total


1Non-Govt

.

Girls School2 Boys School3 Co-edu(Combined)4 Co-edu(Separate)5 School & College Total


Other

s

College/Tech Local Govt. Autonomous (School) Autonomous (School &Coll)

Others Total


1 Govt.2 Non-Govt.3 Others

Total

*** Others Institutions under Local Govment, Autonomous & Others (City Corporation, Cadet College, Model School, Railway, Police, Cantonment etc.)(& Also some Duplicate Entry) etc.

| 31

Documents

dshe.portal.gov.bddshe.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/dshe.portal... · Web viewSYLHET TOTAL Table 58: Zone wise performance of schools as per Indicator 7 and Sub-Indicator