Upload
vuongmien
View
215
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Dual Enrollment Taskforce
January 19, 2013
Presentation for Dual and Adjunct Faculty Professional Development Day
Anahid Petrosian, Assistant Vice President for Academic Advancement
Outline
Dual Enrollment Taskforce
Five Sub-Committees
Research Sub-Committee Report o Program Quality and Student Success
Large and Complex Program
Serving Hidalgo and Starr Counties
o 21 School Districts
o 64 High School sites
o Over 10,000 students
o Over 1,000 Sections
o Faculty involved • Over 250 DE Faculty (High School)
• Over 100 STC faculty
Issues do arise on an on-going basis that need to be addressed.
3
Dual Enrollment Taskforce
Participation
o DE Taskforce membership included representation from Faculty Senate, Council of Chairs, Enrollment Services, High School Programs & Services, and the Office of the Assistant to the Vice President for Academic Affairs.
Charge
o To focus on continuous quality enhancement of the Dual Enrollment Program.
Sub-Committees
o Five sub-committees were established to address current issues
Sub-Committees:
1. Memorandum of Understanding
• Result: Development of Principals’ Agreement
2. Annual Workshop/Meeting
• Result: Annual Dual Enrollment Principals’ Summit
3. DE Student Registration
• Result: Revised application process and new timeline
4. Professional Development
• Result: Development of reference guides
5. Research Program Quality and Student Success
• Results: ……………………..
Summit Participants
HS Principals and Assistants 25
HS Contacts and Deans 26
HS Directors and Others 25
STC Deans, Chairs, HSPS, SAES 27
Total 103
Dual Enrollment Taskforce
Research: Quality of Program and Student Success
Charge:
o To analyze the performance and success rates of DE students.
Recommendation:
• Review of Existing Research
• STC Research Briefs
• UTPA Research
• State Report
• Conduct New Research
• Dual Enrollment Course Offerings
• Grade Distribution
• Student Success in top 20 DE courses
Update Webpage
High School Programs and Services
Webpage
o http://academicaffairs.southtexascolleg
e.edu/highschool/index.html
o Links to Research Resources
STC Research Briefs
o Fall 2009, Spring 2010, and Fall 2010
Research conducted by UTPA
• A Review of Prior College Hours by Dr. Magdalena Hinojosa, Sr.
Associate Vice President for Enrollment Services, University of
Texas-Pan American, February 2012
TACC P-16 Committee Final Report
o Dual Enrollment and Early College High Schools: Findings from a
Survey of Texas Community Colleges, July 2010
State Report
o A study of Dual Credit, Access and Effectiveness in the State of
Texas, Jeryl L. Mumpower, May 2011
Review of Existing Research
STC Research Brief – Fall 2009
Student Success Rates in Traditional, Dual Enrollment, Distance Education Learning, and Hybrid Courses. Research
Brief Fall 2009 volume 19, Issue 1.
Methodology
o Data set from Spring 2009 semester. Review of 3,426 course sections of which 2,340 were traditional, 748 dual enrollment, 295 distance learning, and 43 hybrid.
Key Findings:
o Comparing student success rates (A, B, or C) by course presentation (Traditional, Dual Enrollment, Distance Learning, Hybrid) dual enrollment had the highest success rates (88%).
STC Research Brief – Spring 2010
Significance of Dual Enrollment Programs in
Designing Student Success: Becoming College
Ready, STC Research Brief Spring 2010, Volume 24, Issue 1.
Research Questions:
1) Is the percent of STC dual enrollment high school
graduates who enroll at STC or UTPA next fall
increasing?
2) Is the GPA of dual enrollment students who transfer to
UTPA the same or better than non-dual transfers?
Key Findings
Is the percent of STC dual enrollment high school
graduates who enroll at STC or UTPA next fall increasing?
o More than half of the high school graduates who have participated
in Dual Enrollment are enrolling immediately either at STC or UTPA.
The numbers are increasing every year.
Percent of STC Dual Enrollment
High School Graduates who
enroll at STC or UTPA the next
fall.
Is there a positive association
between prior college hours
and performance at UTPA?
o Positive relationship between
completed credit hours before
transferring and first fall GPA at
UTPA
o The more STC dual hours
students complete, the better
their GPA is at UTPA.
Key Findings
Performance at UTPA
STC Research Brief – Fall 2010
Dual Enrollment/Early College Participation: Findings from
Survey of Texas Community Colleges. STC Research Brief Fall
2010, volume 26, Issue I.
Key Findings: o Performance and completion after conversion.
• During the first year enrolled at the college, dual enrollment
students had course completion rates (earned C or better
grade) that were 19% higher than their peers who had not
participated in dual enrollment while in high school.
Review of Existing Research
State Report
A study of Dual Credit, Access and Effectiveness in the
State of Texas, Jeryl L. Mumpower, May 2011.
Research Question
o How does postsecondary performance of dual
credit participants compare to students who
didn’t participate in dual credit program?
• One-Year Persistence Rates
• Four-Year Graduation Rates
• Persistence Rates by Number of Dual Credits Earned
(2008 Data)
State Research
Review of Existing Research
Research Conducted by UTPA
Where are all the Freshman? A Review of Prior College
Hours. Dr. Magdalena Hinojosa, Sr. Associate VP for
Enrollment Services. February 2012
o Research Question
• Is there a significant difference between students
with prior college hours (Any PCH) and those with no
prior college hours (No PCH)?
• Retention rates
• Cumulative Grade Point Averages
• Graduation rates
Research Question: Retention Rate
Is there a significant difference between students with
prior college hours and those with no prior college hours
as it pertains to Retention Rates?
Key Findings:
o There is a significant association between students with prior
college hours
o 1st year retention rates
• 2.7 times more likely to be retained
o 2nd year retention rates
• 2.8 times more likely to be retained
UTPA Research
82.5% 82.3% 80.3%
63.1% 59.4% 62.2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Fall 08 Fall 09 Fall 10
1st yr Retention RatesAny vs No
Prior College Hours
Any PCH
No PCH
Source: Cohort Data, Office of Enrollment Services, UTPA, Edinburg, TX.
UTPA Research
1st Year and 2nd Year Retention Rate
Student with prior and student without prior year college hours
Research Question: Cumulative Grade Point Average
o Is there a significant difference between current
cumulative grade point averages of students with
prior college hours and those with no prior college
hours?
Key Findings:
o Students with PCH had significantly higher grade
point averages than those without PCH.
Source: Cohort Data, Office of Enrollment Services, UTPA, Edinburg, TX.
Cumulative GPA
Any vs No
Prior College Hours
Research Questions: Graduation Rates
o Is there a significant association between students
with prior college hours and the graduation rates?
o Key Findings:
• 4-year graduation rates
• 8.3 times more likely to graduate
• 5-year graduation rates
• 4.5 times more likely to graduate
• 6-year graduation rates
• 3.7 times more likely to graduate
UTPA Research
Source: Cohort Data, Office of Enrollment Services, UTPA, Edinburg, TX.
1. Quality of Dual Enrollment Program.
o Are students who take dual enrollment program successful?
1. Quality of Dual Enrollment Students.
o Are dual enrollment student success rates comparable to STC
traditional students?
Quality of Dual Enrollment Program o Are students taking dual enrollment program successful?
According to the findings of major studies in this area, the overall
conclusions are that students who take dual enrollment courses while
in high school perform significantly better than students with no prior
dual course work.
• A higher percentage continue their education
• Have a higher persistence rate when they enroll at the
University
• Graduate in at a higher rate
Quality of Dual Enrollment Student
o Student Performance Comparison
New Research
o To examine student success (C or better grade) in the
top 20 dual enrollment courses for the last three years
(2009, 2010, and 2011).
o Top 20 dual enrollment courses
• By course and faculty type
• Dual – HS Faculty
• Dual – STC Faculty
• STC – Traditional course
Review of STC Data
o Dual Enrollment Course Offerings
• By section, enrollment, head count
• Grade distribution comparison
• Top 20 Dual Enrollment courses
• DE student success rate comparison
Fall 2011 Dual Enrollment Numbers
o 88 Different Courses
o 1,039 sections
o 10,607 unduplicated students
o 18,572 duplicated enrollment
Dual Enrollment Grades, Fall 2011
Success: A, B, and C = 86%
A
33%
B
35%
C
18%
D
4%
F
3% W
7%
STC Overall Grades (except DE), Fall
2011 Success: A, B, and C = 67%
A
25%
B
25% C
17%
D
6%
F
15%
W
12%
Original Research
o STC Research and Analytical Services conducted
original research comparing dual enrollment student
success rates by faculty type.
o The top 20 dual enrollment courses for Fall 2009,
2010, and 2011 have been studied.
First finding: Success Rates
o There is no statistically significant difference in most
course success rates between STC faculty teaching
the course and the DE faculty teaching the course.
o The overall results indicate that course success
rates (students passing with A, B, C) for dual
enrollment students (regardless of faculty type) is
significantly higher (20% to 40%) compared to STC
traditional students.
Second Finding: Success Rate Dual compared to Traditional
o The chart below indicates the result and comparison of DE student
success and Traditional student success in the same course taught
by STC faculty.
Sections DE
Enrollment % completed Dual A, B, C
Sections STC
Enrollment %Completed Traditional
A, B, C
2010 204 3,787 79% 255 6,114 63%
2011 189 3,765 77% 272 6,946 61%
• The results indicated that at the College level, all courses taught by
same STC faculty member in dual and traditional format, dual
student success rates were higher than traditional STC students by
16%.
Emerging Themes
Dual Enrollment (DE) is an important pathway for students to successfully complete college courses while still in high school.
Growing evidence that indicates:
o DE students are doing well when they transition to institutions of higher education
• Higher GPA, higher retention rates, and higher graduation rates
o DE students do significantly better than students who enter higher education institutions without any prior college work.
Next Step:
o Focus on enhancing the program quality and student success.