DWMA Booming Business Under Threat Sept 2012 01

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 DWMA Booming Business Under Threat Sept 2012 01

    1/3

    1 Dutch Waste Management Association September 2012

    The market in secondary raw

    materials has rapidly become

    global, but is now under intense

    pressure. The worldwide

    economic crisis is leading to

    surpluses, falling prices and

    import/export restrictions

    imposed by countries to protect

    their own industries. Many of

    our colleagues will not survive.

    The global recycling market is huge.

    Surendra Boradestimates that the eco-

    nomic value of this market is 500 billion

    dollars annually and that it provides an

    income for 20 million people. Borad ischair of the Plastics Committee of the

    Bureau of International Recycling (BIR),

    a federation and lobby organisation for

    the international recycling industry. He

    is also Chairman of Gemini Corporation,

    an Antwerp based sourcing, inspecting

    and logistics company for recyclable raw

    materials, including plastics and steel.

    During his speech to the Paper and Plastic

    Recycling Conference held in February

    this year in Dubai, Borad congratulated

    the audience: Relax and be happy in thefact that we belong to a sunrise industry

    and that it has a very bright and promising

    future.

    But how tenable is Borads vision? There

    is a strong correlation between the gross

    domestic product of a country and its use

    of secondary raw materials. The motor

    behind the global recycling market was the

    phenomenal economic growth in countries

    such as China, India, Russia, Brazil, Turkey

    and South Africa, and the fact that sup-

    plies of primary raw materials alone could

    not keep pace with this rate of growth. The

    production of primary raw materials has its

    limits. Where will we plant the millions of

    trees needed to supply the paper industry if

    we dont collect and recycle waste paper?

    points out Ranjit Baxi, managing director

    of J&H Sales International in London and

    president of the Paper Division of the BIR.

    But even the growth countries have not

    escaped the current global economic crisis

    and have seen their growth rates fall. As

    a result, countries that have traditionallyhad a strong recycling industry, especially

    the member states of the European Union

    and the United States, now have surpluses

    FREE TRADE BENEFITS GLOBAL

    RECYCLING MARKET

    Boomingbusiness

    under threat

    According to the OECD, currently 20 per cent of the scrap steel market

    is subject to import and export restrictions. (photos: BIR)

  • 7/28/2019 DWMA Booming Business Under Threat Sept 2012 01

    2/3

    Dutch Waste Management Association September 2012 2

    of secondary raw materials. In addition,

    the recycling industry has been hit hard by

    rising transport costs, making exports no

    longer always an attractive option.

    ECONOMIC NATIONALISM

    To cap it all, the crisis has precipitated

    a renewed economic nationalism. In a

    growing number of countries there are

    calls to restrict imports and exports of

    primary and secondary raw materials in

    order to protect their own industries. This

    presents a serious threat to the European

    recycling industry: in Europe much lower

    volumes of secondary raw materials are

    processed than are collected, which means

    that export restrictions are leading to sur-

    pluses. A sustained fall in prices and bank-

    ruptcies are all too likely.

    One of the material streams suffering from

    such barriers is scrap plastic. Although the

    market as a whole is growing, some coun-

    tries are closing their doors to imports.

    China wants only high quality material,

    the United States have put scrap plastic

    on the red list, and the doorway to the

    Indian market has been reduced to just

    a crack. Borad of the BIR sketches the

    consequences: In 2010 Europe produced

    about 24 million tonnes of scrap plastic.

    Only about 6 million tonnes of this is recy-

    cled, half in Europe and the other half

    elsewhere. As Europe does not have suf-

    ficient processing capacity, we are left with

    a lot of plastic for export. If other countries

    close their borders, for example in retali-

    ation for our export restrictions, then we

    will be left with a gigantic mountain of

    surplus plastic. That is why the recy-

    cling industry repeatedly emphasises the

    importance of free trade, which it argues

    is beyond dispute. No country is independ-

    ent with regard to its raw materials needs.

    Every country benefits from a functioning

    international market for raw materials,

    including those obtained from secondary

    material streams, which is why industry

    needs increasing harmonisation of the

    environmental, public health and quality

    aspects of raw materials. Free markets

    lead to competitive prices and an increas-

    ingly efficient recycling infrastructure. And

    most importantly of all, a global market

    stimulates technological innovation.

    THE MIRACLE OF CARTAGENA

    Not only the plastic sector, but also the

    tyre industry is facing import and export

    restrictions. This is a cause for concern

    to Barend ten Bruggencate, who has

    spent his whole working life in the tyre

    industry and is chairman of the BIR Tyres

    Committee. He says that although the

    market for end-of-life tyres is interna-tionally oriented, some countries do not

    permit any imports, justifying their posi-

    tion by invoking the Basel Convention on

    the Control of Transboundary Movements

    of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal.

    In this respect, the outcome of the tenth

    conference of the 118 member countries

    of the Convention gives grounds for hope.

    Some have already dubbed this agreement

    the miracle of Cartagena, referring to the

    Columbian city where the tenth Conference

    of the Parties was held. The breakthrough

    was that waste is now not just seen as

    an unwanted and costly by-product of the

    modern consumption society, but also as

    a potentially valuable raw material offer-

    ing numerous opportunities for green jobs

    and green industry. According to Katharina

    Peiry, the executive secretary of the Basel

    Convention, it means Basel is no longer

    synonymous with the control and prohi-

    bition of waste transactions. This is an

    extremely important change in the position

    held by governments, she says. The UN

    Conference on Sustainable Development

    (Rio+20) last June let the opportunity slip

    to endorse the value of waste as a raw

    material.

    UNDER THREAT

    According to Christian Rubach, president of

    the Ferrous Division of the BIR, the market

    for scrap steel has so far been the freest

    in the world. There are no monopolies,

    and even the biggest scrap producer is a

    relatively small player. Factors hindering

    free trade are the exchange rates betweenthe euro and the dollar and high transport

    costs. But this sector too is under threat

    from intervention in the free market by

    governments that prefer to keep scrap

    steel for their own markets. According

    to the OECD, currently 20 per cent of the

    scrap steel market is subject to import

    and export restrictions. Rubach fears thatthis situation will continue for some time.

    Each country blames the others. Their

    reasoning is as follows: If China imposes

    export restrictions on its rare earth ele-

    ments, we will block exports of our scrap

    steel to them. Or: Why should we in the

    EU export our cleanly produced scrap to

    India or China, where dirty technologies

    will be used to turn it into products that we

    will then import? Rubach does not have

    a good word to say about this line of rea-

    soning. They are stupid arguments which

    are only intended to bring down European

    scrap prices. The ones to profit will be the

    European steel producers. That is what is

    behind it, nothing else.

    The EU is already burdened by a scrap

    steel surplus of 20 to 30 million tonnes,

    warns Rubach, and each new export

    restriction will lead to a further drop in

    price. Producers of scrap steel also have

    to cope with the fact that the proportion of

    scrap steel used in global steel produc-

    tion is declining. The main responsibility

    for this lies with China, which reprocesses

    extremely small amounts of scrap in the

    manufacture of steel. According to Rubach,

    China produces about 700 million tonnes

    of steel per year and the proportion of

    scrap used in the manufacture of this steel

    is very low indeed, at about 10 per cent.

    China hates importing raw materials if

    it is not absolutely necessary, he says.

    However, he believes it is simply a matter

    of time. China is gradually improving its

    capacity to recycle scrap steel, an objectivewhich is also stated in its five-year plan.

    In about ten to fifteen years China will have

    caught up with the rest of the international

    RANJIT BAXI (BIR PAPER):

    Many will not survive.

    CHRISTIAN RUBACH

    (BIR FERROUS METALS):

    The EU is alreadyburdened by a steel scrap

    surplus.

  • 7/28/2019 DWMA Booming Business Under Threat Sept 2012 01

    3/3

    3 Dutch Waste Management Association September 2012

    steel-producing community. The same

    goes for the emerging economies such as

    Brazil, Russia and India.

    PAPER FIBRE SURPLUS

    The European waste paper sector faces a

    similar problem: a gigantic surplus that

    has already risen to 8 to 10 million tonnes.

    Europe recovers more waste paper than

    it needs. The cause of this malaise is the

    economic crisis and the low paper prices.

    In many countries the ambitious European

    recycling target of 70 per cent recycling

    in 2015 has led to contracts between

    waste collectors and governments that

    include fixed prices for collection. These

    take no account of a protracted economic

    crisis in which the demand for paper has

    declined substantially and prices have

    fallen, including the prices collectors

    receive from the paper manufacturers.

    The result is a backlog of waste paper.

    According to Ranjit Baxi, president of the

    BIR Paper Division, the obvious solution

    is to export the surplus, but this course

    of action is frustrated by two problems:

    the high transport costs and the unfa-

    vourable transaction costs. To reduce

    costs the collectors are prepared toaccept lower quality waste paper. Every

    week that the economic crisis continues

    lower quality paper fibre is exported to

    Asia. In response, China, Indonesia and

    other Asian countries are imposing strict

    quality requirements for imported paper.

    European waste paper was always Asias

    second choice (after American paper),

    but because of the lower quality it is in

    danger of falling further down the pecking

    order. This is not good news for European

    recyclers, says Baxi, who expects that the

    crisis will hurt many of his colleagues.

    Many will not survive.

    TYRE SECTOR THE RECYCLING CHAMPION

    The European tyre sector is the champion recycler. In almost all the countries of the

    European Union, mountains of end of life tyres have become a thing of the past. In 2011, 95

    per cent of all end of life tyres were collected and reprocessed. According to the most recent

    figures, 40 per cent of the end of life tyres go for materials recycling, 38 per cent are incin-

    erated with energy recovery (mainly in cement kilns), 10 per cent are exported, 8 per cent

    are retreaded and just 4 per cent are landfilled. For comparison, in 1994 only 17 per cent of

    European tyres were recycled or incinerated with energy recovery and no less than 62 per

    cent of end of life tyres were landfilled. Barend ten Bruggencate, chairman of the BIR Tyres

    Committee, is pleased with these figures. In the EU and the United States we have moved

    on from treating end of life tyres as waste; they are raw materials of considerable value.

    The market value of the recycled material is the big issue surrounding end-of-life tyres.

    Rubber granulate from end of life tyres is increasingly being accepted as a raw material for

    the manufacture of synthetic playing fields, asphalt and noise barriers. For one thing, the

    material is sound-absorbent. Eventually, end of life tyres will be converted into a stream

    of profitable products. The recycling of end of life tyres has a bright future. Over the next

    thirty years the rapid growth in the number of cars and lorries will lead to a doubling of

    the demand for rubber. The supply of natural rubber will never be able to keep up

    with this rate of growth. According to Ten Bruggencate, a growing number of

    initiatives are being developed for mixing granulate and rubber.

    SURENDRA BORAD

    (BIR PLASTICS):

    Europe does not havesufficient processing

    capacity.

    BAREND TEN BRUGGENCATE

    (BIR TYRES):

    Eventually, end of lifetyres will be converted into

    a stream of profitableproducts.

    translationDe

    rekMiddleton,

    Zevenaardesignsuggestie&i

    llusie,

    Utrecht