1
METHOD MARKET ANALYSIS SELF EXPERIMENTS FEASABILITY ANALYSIS PURPOSE THE DYNAMIC VISUAL ACUITY (DVA) DEFI- NES THE ABILITY TO DETECT FINE DETAILS IN MOVING OBJECTS. AVAILABLE DIGITAL TESTING DEVICES SUFFER FROM: • A POOR DISPLAY PERFORMANCE • MOTION BLUR • AFTERIMAGES CONSIDERING THE TECHNOLOGICAL PRO- GRESS OF VISUAL DISPLAY UNITS A NEW, STANDARDIZED TESTING METHOD FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF THE DVA SHOULD BE ACHIEVED. CONCLUSION DUE TO MODERN DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY IT IS POSSIBLE TO MEASURE THE DVA DEPENDING ON THE ANGULAR VELOCI- TY AND THE SIZE OF THE OPTOTYPE. THEREFORE A NEW STANDARDIZED TESTING METHOD HAS BEEN DEVELOPED. THE TECHNICAL PROGRESS NEEDS TO BE OBSERVED, ABOVE ALL: HDMI 2.0 AS WELL AS 4K-RESOLUTION.THE TEST SHOULD BE RECODED IN C++ TO MINIMIZE THE RAN- DOMIZATION AND PRESENTATION EFFORT AND TO LOWER THE REQUIRED COMPUTER PERFORMANCE. FURTHER STU- DIES SHOULD DETERMINE AND VALIDATE DEFINED VELOCI- TIES AND SIZES OF THE MOVING OPTOTYPES. VISUAL ACUITY UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES JENA/GERMANY ERIC HENKER, B.SC.; OLIVER KOLBE B.SC.; PROF. WOLFGANG SICKENBERGER DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW DISPLAY BASED TESTING METHOD DYNAMI CONTACT: [email protected] UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES JENA 07745 JENA - GERMANY RESULTS C ODE SUITABLE & EASY TO USE; BUT VERY ELABO- RATE REQUIRES EXCELENT CODING SKILLS PRESENTAT ION OP T O T YP E STANDARDIZED; MORE VALID VA; LOWER CHANCE OF GUESSING, BUT ROUND: BAD FOR DIGITAL PRESEN- TATION RECKTANGULAR. GOOD FOR DIGITAL PRESENTATION; LESS RELIABLE (DUE TO BIG CONTRAST DIFFERENCES) PATH TOO SHORT DIPLAY DURATI- ON FOR HIGHER ANGULAR VELOCITIES; VARIABLE DURATION TIME LANDOLT SNELLEN STRAIGHT CIRCLE NO END POINT - DURATION TIME CAN BE DEFINED TO A FIXED VALUE (2s) T EST ING ME T HOD DISP LAY T ECHNOLOG Y TOO SLOW (60HZ) OR POOR DPI OR TOO EXPENSIVE VERY FAST 240HZ EIZO DISPLAY (BLINKING BACKLIGHT), GOOD REACTION TIME; AKZEPTABLE DPI TOO SLOW AND POOR REACTION TIME; TOO SMALL OR TOO EX- PENSIVE POOR DPI; POOR REACTION TIME; INHOMOGENEOUS BACK- LIGHT PROJECTOR MONITOR TABLET PC TV DVA TEST P ROP ER T IES START DVA HERE SHOW RANDOMIZED OPTOTYPE ANSWER WITHIN 5s? YES CORRECT ANSWER? MORE THAN 3 NOs? NO ABLE TO REDUCE OPTOTYPE SIZE? REDUCE OPTOTYPE SIZE TEST ENDS HERE MORE THAN 3 YES? RAISE ANGULAR VELOCITY LOWER ANGULAR VELOCITY NEXT UP YES NO COUNT YES NO COUNT YES NO CHECK YES NO

DYNAMI RESULTS DVA TEST PROPERT IES C ... - JenVis Research€¦ · dva test propert ies start dva here show randomized optotype answer within 5s? yes correct answer? more than 3

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: DYNAMI RESULTS DVA TEST PROPERT IES C ... - JenVis Research€¦ · dva test propert ies start dva here show randomized optotype answer within 5s? yes correct answer? more than 3

METHOD

MARKET ANALYSIS

SELF EXPERIMENTS

FEASABILITY ANALYSIS

PURPOSETHE DYNAMIC VISUAL ACUITY (DVA) DEFI-NES THE ABILITY TO DETECT FINE DETAILS IN MOVING OBJECTS. AVAILABLE DIGITAL TESTING DEVICES SUFFER FROM:

• A POOR DISPLAY PERFORMANCE

• MOTION BLUR

• AFTERIMAGES

CONSIDERING THE TECHNOLOGICAL PRO-GRESS OF VISUAL DISPLAY UNITS A NEW, STANDARDIZED TESTING METHOD FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF THE DVA SHOULD BE ACHIEVED.

CONCLUSION

DUE TO MODERN DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY IT IS POSSIBLE TO MEASURE THE DVA DEPENDING ON THE ANGULAR VELOCI-TY AND THE SIZE OF THE OPTOTYPE. THEREFORE A NEW STANDARDIZED TESTING METHOD HAS BEEN DEVELOPED. THE TECHNICAL PROGRESS NEEDS TO BE OBSERVED, ABOVE ALL: HDMI 2.0 AS WELL AS 4K-RESOLUTION.THE TEST SHOULD BE RECODED IN C++ TO MINIMIZE THE RAN-DOMIZATION AND PRESENTATION EFFORT AND TO LOWER THE REQUIRED COMPUTER PERFORMANCE. FURTHER STU-DIES SHOULD DETERMINE AND VALIDATE DEFINED VELOCI-TIES AND SIZES OF THE MOVING OPTOTYPES.

VISUAL ACUITY

UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES JENA/GERMANYERIC HENKER, B.SC.; OLIVER KOLBE B.SC.; PROF. WOLFGANG SICKENBERGER

DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW DISPLAY BASED TESTING METHOD

DYNAMI

CONTACT:[email protected] UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES JENA07745 JENA - GERMANY

RESULTS

C ODESUITABLE & EASY TO USE; BUT VERY ELABO-RATE

REQUIRES EXCELENT CODING SKILLS

P RESENTAT IONOP T O T YP E

STANDARDIZED; MORE VALID VA; LOWER CHANCE OF GUESSING, BUT ROUND: BAD FOR DIGITAL PRESEN-TATION

RECKTANGULAR. GOOD FOR DIGITAL PRESENTATION; LESS RELIABLE (DUE TO BIG CONTRAST DIFFERENCES)

P ATHTOO SHORT DIPLAY DURATI-ON FOR HIGHER ANGULAR VELOCITIES; VARIABLE DURATION TIME

LANDOLT

SNELLEN

STRAIGHT

CIRCLE

NO END POINT - DURATION TIME CAN BE DEFINED TO A FIXED VALUE (2s)

T EST ING METHOD

DISP LAY T ECHNOLOGYTOO SLOW (60HZ) OR POOR DPI OR TOO EXPENSIVE

VERY FAST 240HZ EIZO DISPLAY (BLINKING BACKLIGHT), GOOD REACTION TIME; AKZEPTABLE DPI

TOO SLOW AND POOR REACTION TIME; TOO SMALL OR TOO EX-PENSIVE

POOR DPI; POOR REACTION TIME; INHOMOGENEOUS BACK-LIGHT

PROJECTOR

MONITOR

TABLET PC

TV

DVA T EST P ROP ERT IES

START DVA HERESHOW RANDOMIZED OPTOTYPE

ANSWER WITHIN 5s?

YES

CORRECT ANSWER?

MORE THAN 3 NOs?

NO

ABLE TO REDUCE OPTOTYPE SIZE?

REDUCEOPTOTYPE SIZE

TEST ENDS HERE

MORE THAN 3 YES?

RAISE ANGULAR

VELOCITY

LOWER ANGULAR VELOCITY

NEXT UP

YES NO

COUNT

YES NO

COUNT

YES NO

CHECK

YES NO