1

E-government Development Collaboration

18th, January, 2011

Initiation meeting (2011)

2

WeGo is a neutral and virtual organization to facilitate world e-government development

focusing cities and local government level

Seoul Metropolitan Government : WeGo

3

1985 1996 2006 20102002 2003

Korea’s current national ICT prosperity started from a well-made strategic master plan

in the beginning with successful local government integration

Cyber Korea 21

e-KoreaVision 2006

Next GenerationE-Government

AdministrationComputerization

u-Government e-Government

2007

e-Gov Level I

e-Gov Level II-III

e-Gov Level III-IV

“Information Super-highway”Broadband Information N/W

Wireless InternetMobile Application

Stand-alone System Web-based Integration“Transaction-enabled”

“Ubiquitous”Shared-Service

Picture Source: Ministry of Public Administration and Security (2007)

Introduction : Korea e-Government

4

2003 2004 2005 2007 2010 Top 4 Countries(2010)

United

Nation

e-Readiness index 13 5 5 6 12nd: United Stated, 3rd: Canada

4th: United Kingdom, 5th: Netherland

e-Participation index 12 6 4 2 12nd: Australia, 3rd: Spain

4th: New Zealand, United Kingdom, 5th: Japan

Korea is ranked as the world most advanced E-government country by UN, 2010

Partner

searchE-Government

Consulting Pilot

Project

Main

Project

Follow-up

ProjectJointly discuss to define prioritized area

Master Plan, ICT Feasibility StudyProfessional dispatch

Pilot module project application

Linkage with EDCF, Korea Trust Fund, PPP for fund

Joint technology transfer and seminars

Sharing the experience of Korea’s e-government &

representing its “Best Practice” to worldwide

WeGo’s

Role

Introduction : International Cooperation Program

International Cooperation Stage

Korea has been providing various professional ICT promotion services to emerging

countries

5

E-government Master plan (8 nations) : Mongolia, Nepal, Indonesia, Kazakhstan,

Dominica, Senegal, Peru, Kyrgizstan

Feasibility Studies (31 nations, 73 projects) : Vietnam, Indonesia, Mongolia, Tanzania,

Uzbekistan etc.

Introduction : International Cooperation Program Reference

Source: NIPA, Korea

CASE STUDY: Dar Es Salaam City Council

7

Project Organization

Organization Role & Responsibility

SMG Program Management- Overall management

- Provides best practices and e-Government experiences

DCC Project Coordination - F/S project coordination

POSCO ICT F/S Consulting

- Project Management (Scope, Schedule, etc.)

- Expertise sharing through Assessment, Analysis, and To-Be

modeling

Tanzania government & Dar es Salaam City council

Korea Government &Seoul Metropolitan Government

Planning & CoordinationSection

Information Technology Unit

The project has been progressed by both Dar es Salaam and Global e-Government

team of Seoul Metropolitan Government (SMG)

Information and Communication Division

Global e-Government Team

POSCO ICTIT Consulting Team

8

CASE: Dar Es Salaam Project

Project : Dar es Salaam e-Government Feasibility Study

Project Duration: November, 2010 – January, 2011

F/S consulting framework: problem-solving approach (As-Is To-Be)

AS-ISAnalysis

Benchmarking(Seoul)

To-BeModeling

Project Execution

Plan

Process / Weeks JanuaryDecemberNovember

Preliminary Analysis

AS-IS Current Analysis

On-Site Survey

ICT Infrastructure Analysis

New Architecture Modeling

Project Defining

Execution Planning

Project Duration (November 22, 2010 – January 21, 2011)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Final Report

9

Analysis - Interview

As-Is Analysis has been done through several interviews with leader and staffs

10

Analysis- On site survey

Systems, work processes, and environments were surveyed in on-site manner

11

Analysis- Document research

Also the study produced customized assessment in decision making structure, current

status and importance of capital city in a developing country

12

Analysis- Comparative research

Through finding gap between expected goal and current standpoint for defining

feasible solutions for DAR,

13

Suggested solutions (To-Be Image)

Administration Information System Office AutomationService Portal

File Management

System

Groupware

Eg. School

enrollment Info.

Eg. Tax

Payment Info.

…

LAN & MAN

Network Security

IT

Infrastructure

School Enrollment Management DB

… DB

EPICOR DB

MRECOM DB

Human Resource & Salary Management DB

Intranet

-Portal

Urban Infra Information System

Road & Parking Slot Management DB

GIS DB

… DB

Front Office Back Office

1

2

1

2

2

Office

Equipment

(PC etc)

1

Information

& Service

Operating System FS Implementation System Long-Term Implementation SystemIndex:

1 21st Implementation System 2nd Implementation System

Linkage

Linkage

Linkage

Directions

• Promoting office

automation & IT

Infrastructure

reinforcing for the next

2 ~ 3 year

The team therefore suggested further development plan such as office automation

and IT infrastructure reinforcement

Key Achievements

1. Implementation of

electronic working

process environment

2. Modernization of IT

Infrastructure

3. Strengthen of IT

organization Capacity

14

Implementation Schedule

Groupware and EP implementation is followed by BPR/ISP establishment, FMS

implementation, LAN environment modernization and security strengthening

Both parties need to make effort promoting in its country as well as utilizing 3rd party

resources such as Trust Fund and Grant from KOICA as financial resources

Enhancement Capacity

of IT Organization

Enhancement of IT

Infra

Office Automation

• Usage of KOICA Grant aid• Usage of Korea Trust Fund

Financial Resources

Year 2Year 1YearLayers

Reinforcement of Organization

PCs

Groupware & EP

PC & Internet Training

Groupware Training

File Management System

Document Digitalization

BPR & ISP

Ready for KTF

Request

Ready for KOICA

Grant aid Request

E-Government Expert

Training by Korea

E-Government Expert

Training by Korea

Enhancement of

Network Security

PCs & LAN

DCC’s Part SMC’s Part

Discussion

16

Cooperative Relationship Building among Organizations

Through Mutual-cooperation between WeGO and EAC will generate significant benefits to

multiple parties

WeGo

Seoul City Gov’tStrategic / Technical

Cooperation

EAC MDB

MoFA MoFA

Local City e-GovernmentCooperation(i.e. MOU)

KOICA

East African Community

City A City B City …

e-Gov. policy Sponsorship for

member countries

Request Grant aid / Accept

Cooperative Supporting for

Grant aid

Supporting Agreement on Grant

Grant

KOREA EAC Countries

Consulting Sponsorship Proven

project development Financial

arrangement support

Drastic and Feasible projects are on hand

as a result of collaboration

EAC provides a new, simple but powerful

e-gov development triggering method for

member countries

Strong bond with Korean government

through actual co-projects experiences

and MOU setup

Best Practice Training Program

EAC gains further recognition as a sound

regional body from other governments

Supporting Utilize

of Korea Trust Fund

Korea Trust Fund

Cooperation Values

17

Thank you