Upload
aleda
View
26
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
E01-011 Analysis update Adjust of the Splitter-HKS Side. Yuncheng Han May 09, 2012 Hampton University JLab hypernuclear collaboration meeting. Outline. Overview of the E01-011 experiment Principle of the forward optics tune Methods of the optical matrix modification - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
E01-011 Analysis updateAdjust of the Splitter-HKS Side
Yuncheng HanMay 09, 2012
Hampton UniversityJLab hypernuclear collaboration meeting
2
Outline
• Overview of the E01-011 experiment• Principle of the forward optics tune• Methods of the optical matrix modification• Further optimize the optical matrices from
focal plane to sieve slit plane• Status using the new optical matrices
3
Overview of the E01-011 ExperimentCarried out at JLab in 2005, to obtain high resolution, high yield rates hypernuclear spectroscopy, for study of hyperon-nucleon interaction.
e + p → / 0+ e’+ K+
Target N
e + N → N + e’+ K+
e
γ*
e’
K+
p
/0
Three generations : E89-009 (2000), E01-011 (2005), E05-115(2009)
4
The Results of E01-011 Experiment-6.730.02 0.2 MeV
7He
FWHM ~500 keV
12B
12B : consistent of JLab E89-009;
much better resolution.
28Al :1st medium-heavy hyper-nuclear
spectrum w/ clear s-, p-, d-shell state peaks; space of s- and p- shell states 1~2 MeV wider but p- and d- shell states ~1 MeV narrower than expected
7He: 1st time w/ high statistics;
BΛ and feature confirmed;Paper drafted: n-halo state, CSB.
B (MeV)
HKSJLAB
Cou
nts
(150
keV
/bin
)
s
p d
28Al
5
The Status of E01-011 Experiment
• Data analysis was already done, 7He, 12
B, 28Al;
• However, the splitter magnet actual current in this exp was 8.5 % bigger than the designed value, which made the real optics different a lot from the designed one. The previous analysis used the designed optics as an initial, and relying on mathematical method (nonlinear χ2 fit ) for optimization;
• Freedom of the mathematical tune is large (1260 elements in the optics matrices), so the reliability of the final results was not solid;
• Since the fringe field near the splitter magnet region introduce asymmetry to the magnetic field map, a better optics can be gotten if consider the asymmetry.
6
Previous analysis method
Nonlinear least χ2 fittingkinematical scan
Geant3
CH2 data
Λ & Σ0 mass spectroscopy
Field map
Kinematics: masses and emit angles of Λ & Σ0
Mathematical tune of optics matrices
Initialoptics matrices
Tuned matrices
Exp. data
Backward tune
Λ-hypernuclear spectroscopy
Final matrices
7
New Analysis method
Magnetic field study
Geant3 simulation Sim focal plane distribution
Exp data
Calculated Λ/Σ spectroscopy
Field map
A
Reconstructedsieve slit distri
B
Mass/angle independence
C
Qualifications of A, B and C
Optical matrices Exp focal plane distribution
Sieve slitgeometry
8
Relationship between sieve slit and focal plane
Target SplitterSieveSlit Q1-Q2-Dipole
Focal Plane K+
9
• New optical matrices was introduced to satisfy Focal plane distribution sim match exp data Reconstructed sieve slit distribution match real sieve slit geometry Calculated masses independent on kinematical parameters of kaons (p, X’, Y’)
• New optical matrices was gotten by Introduce asymmetry function to the magnetic field map offset of the field map geometry Adjust position of focal plane
Strategy of introduce new opticsTarget Splitter Sieve
SlitQ1-Q2-Dipole Focal
Plane K+
Focal plane position 235 cm to 265 cmChambers’ distance 100 cm to 36 cm
Splitter asymmetry
Q1 asymmetry
Q2 asymmetry
Dipole asymmetry
14
FP X’-X FP Y-X Sieve Slit
Comparison of focal plane/sieve slit distribution
W/ initial optical matrices
W/ new optical matrices
15
Comparison of mass dependence on kinematics
W/ initial optical matrices
W/ new optical matrices
16
Region of one hole Center of the hole (X-X0)2 + (Y-Y0)2 < R2 (X0,Y0)
Further optimize the optical matrices
17
Masses and emit angles of Λ/ w/ new matrices
18
W/ initial optical matrices
W/ new optical matrices
Comparison of Λ/0 mass spectrum
Mathematical method (nonlinear least χ2 fit )
19
12B
Δ ~ 10.79 MeV
Δ ~ 11.64 MeV
Δ ~ 10.97 MeV
Δ ~ 11.05 MeV
Comparison of 12B mass spectrum
20
Summary• E01-011 experiment was carried out in 2005 at JLab, analysis was
already done, 7He, 12
B, 28Al;
• Initial optical matrices was poor, by introduce scaling asymmetry function, offset field map geometry, and adjust position of focal plane, new optical matrices for Splitter-HKS side was obtained;
• Quality of Λ/0 spectrum w/ new optical matrices is already comparable of previous finalized results;
• 12B mass spectrum was checked w/ new optical matrices ;
• New optical matrices for electron arm will be tune soon• More reliable and higher quality results are expected with the new
optical matrices (for both electron arm and kaon arm) and the powerful nonlinear least χ2 fit mathematical tune.
21
Residual of present optical matrices