Upload
roanna-abbott
View
30
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Early Learning Leadership, Governance, and Stakeholder Engagement November 15, 2011 John Pruette (NC) Stacie Demchak (CO) Jaci Holmes (ME). North Carolina. Phase I Data Management Group (DMG) Established in 2009 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
1
Early Learning Leadership, Governance, and Stakeholder Engagement
November 15, 2011
John Pruette (NC)Stacie Demchak (CO)
Jaci Holmes (ME)
2
North Carolina
Phase I
Data Management Group (DMG)• Established in 2009
• Designed to ensure agency compliance with state statutes, NC State Board of Education Policy and best practice standards for data management (collection, storage and sharing)
• Focused upon meeting responsibility to provide accurate and timely data to key stakeholders
Elements of Success• Established comprehensive enterprise data management guidelines and policies
regarding data collection, management and use• Established Collaboration and Buy-in between Source System Owners (22+)
• Operationalized Unique Student and Staff Identifiers (UID)
• Recognized Authoritative Sources for Data
• Established Uniform Guidelines for Internal/External Data Sharing
3
North Carolina
Phase II
ECAC Data Management• Proposed in RTT-ELC Grant• Cross Agency Representation• Emulate Successful Strategies and Structures of DMG
o Collaboration and Buy-ino UIDo Authoritative Sourceo Uniform Guidelines for Data Sharing
• Establish Effective Linkage to existing DMG at NC Department of Public Instruction
4
North Carolina
Value Added
• Streamlined Data Collection for Source Systems
• Enabled by UID and File Transfer
• Consistency across Data Collections
• Individual Agency Data Needs
• External Stakeholders
• Strengthened Reliability of State Longitudinal Data System (CEDARS)
• Adherence to Policy
• Demonstrated Capacity for Expansion
• PK-12 >> P-20 >> P-20W
5
Colorado
Colorado SLDS Governance Overview – Three Levels of Governance
• While management consists of actual decisions made, governance offers a structure for making those decisions. With a program like SLDS, it is critical that a governance structure is put into place so the program’s executive sponsors may steer the program as necessary, and the more tactical business and technical personnel can continue with the day to day development of effective results.
• The role of Governance in SLDS is to offer a decision-making mechanism that consists of
committees, review boards and policy-makers. Members of the high level executive steering governance committee focus on strategy, investment and architecture. They also have responsibility to assign the decision-making authority and accountability.
• Membership must be chosen carefully, so that each stakeholder with a vested interest is able to voice his/her opinion.
• The SLDS Program Team integrates each tier of governance and provides the conduit between the tiers. The SLDS Program Team addresses any and all issues that may arise between the independent groups at each level. The team strives for consensus decision making and utilizes the Executive Steering Committee only when necessary to resolve issues.
6
Colorado
Feedback to stakeholders for decision-making-Interactive Web Portals-Collaboration Tools-Others -Continuous Improvement
Technology Foundation -Integration cross agencies-Foundational Unique Identifier-Comms and interfaces in/out of Link phase-Others-Continuous Improvement
Collect Student Data (cross Districts)-Technical Imp Strategy-SIS-ADE Replacement-Others-Continuous Improvement
Stakeholder feedback, decisions, improvements
District student and educator information, reported data, business criteria
Data/access tools available to stakeholders
Master Data ManagementStrategy
Program Management
SLDS Governance –CO Students/Citizens/StakeholdersProgram-level Acceptance Criteria
Focus/User Groups –districts,
reporting teams, SIS user
groups/state user feedback
Focus/User Groups – state cross-agency
stakeholders/state level business input
Project Governance-Project-level Acceptance
Criteria
7
Leadership, Governance & Stakeholder Engagement
Leadership• Top down implementation strategy is critical
• Need to include representation from both business and technical areas
• Coordination between all groups involved (Department of Education, Governor's Office, Human Services)
• Focus on the most important questions to be answered
• Keep sustainability in mind when planning and implementing
Governance• All lay stakeholders contribute to governance• Emphasis on leadership for priority settings on the data to be accessed• Important to implement a layered approach that includes diverse stakeholders
Colorado
8
Colorado
Leadership, Governance & Stakeholder Engagement
Stakeholder Involvement• Identify & involve stakeholders groups early and keep them engaged
• On-going communication strategy
• Formalize their involvement through the governance structure
9
Maine
Data Management Team• Established in 2006 by the Commissioner of Education
• Need identified to manage data collections and centralize data systems in order to reduce burden on LEAs, improve efficiency of data requests and control costs
• Membership includes representatives of DOE leadership, program areas, data management, school finance, State Office of Information Technology, LEAs, public pre-k, early intervention/early childhood special education, and Head Start
• Serves as steering committee for SLDS grants and projects
• Meets monthly in Augusta – web conferencing for remote access
Responsibilities• Maintains data standards and data use policies
• Manages security and user access to education data
• Ensures adherence to Federal and State policies including FERPA
• Approves data collections and surveys – “Only collect data elements once”
• Maintains file of all data related MOUs and MOAs, including Interagency Agreements
Projects/Accomplishments• Sponsored Education Data Sources Inventory
• Established and maintains Education Data Dictionary
• Hired Education Data Manager – now chairs Data Management Team
• Assisted with SLDS and other grant applications
• Established Data Standards documentation
• Reduced number of LEA data collections
• Eliminated redundant data repositories
• Developing single student identifier for early childhood across departments
Challenges
• Regular participation – Obtain leadership support, provide remote access
• Maintaining relevance – Provide value, not just control and compliance. Be seen as the core resource for education data
• Policy limitations – Escalate policy issues/recommendations to DOE leadership
• Data sharing/policies with other State agencies – Cross team membership
10
Maine
11
Focused Early Childhood Governance – Aligning and Coordinating Early Childhood Across the State
MACECDMaine Children’s Growth Council
Department of Health and Human Services
Department of Education
Governor LePage
SAIEL Team of Participating State Agencies
12
Contact Info and Resources:John Pruette, [email protected]
Stacie Demchak, [email protected]
Jaci Holmes, [email protected]
To Request SST Support: Fill out a TA Request
Form on GRADS
Early Learning Leadership, Governance and Stakeholder Engagement