1
Earthquake Ground Motion in the San Francisco Bay Area Using Three-Dimensional Finite Difference Simulations Arthur Rodgers 1 and Anders Petersson 2 [email protected] [email protected] 1 Atmospheric, Earth and Energy Division and 2 Center for Applied Scientific Computing Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Avenue, Livermore, CA 94551 USA Simulations were performed using LLNL-developed WPP code, the USGS 3D seismic velocity model for the San Francisco Bay Area (Brocher et al., 2006) and parallel computers operated by Livermore Computing at LLNL. Piedmont 2007/07/20 Earthquake Simulation of the 2007 July 20 Piedmont earthquake was done with the WPP code for 100 km x 100 km x 30 km volume with 100 m grid spacing for accurate synthetics to 0.5 Hz. Seismograms were obtained from the NCEDC for the Berkeley Digital Seismic Network (BDSN, blue triangles), Northern Hayward Fault Network (NHFN, yellow) and strong-motion instruments of the USGS Northern CA Network (green). Comparison of observed and synthstic seismograms shows good agreement in general with satisfactory prediction of amplitudes and waveform complexity. Longer paths (> 10 km) often show the synthetics arriving ahead of the data, consistent with an earlier study (Rodgers et al., BSSA 2008). -122˚30' -122˚00' -121˚30' 37˚30' 38˚00' BK.BDM BK.JRSC BK.WENL BK.VALB NC.CAG NC.CPM N N computational domain NC.CLCB WPP is an open-source anelastic finite difference code that runs on single or multiple processors. It’s been compiled and run on Linux, AIX and Mas OS X platforms. It can represent single or multiple point force and/or moment tensor sources. WPP features mesh refinement in the vertical direction to greatly im- prove memory and computational efficiency. We will soon have a version with non-planar free surface topography. WPP is available to all free of charge. It can be requested and downloaded from https://computation.llnl.gov/casc/serpentine/ NC.CAG NC.CPM BK.VALB NC.CLCB BK.WENL BK.BDM BK.JRSC Absolute time and amplitude scaling Hayward Fault Scenario Earthquakes We performed simulations of scenario earthquakes on the Hayward Fault using re- ported finite rupture models from the 1995/01/17 (M 7) Kobe, Japan strike-slip earth- quake. We used finite source models from: Wald (1996) Mw = 6.92 Sekiguchi et al. (2000) Mw = 7.02 Zeng and Anderson (2000) Mw = 6.90 Finite source models were obtained from the database maintained by Martin Mai (http://www.seismo.ethz.ch/srcmod). Simulations were performed using WPP with a 150 km x 100 km x 50 km volume with 100 m grid spacing and minimum shear veloc- ity of 500 m/s for accurate synthetics to 0.5 Hz. Seismograms were computed on the grid of stations surrounding the fault, shown below. Horizontal component ground velocity seismograms for three rupture models with a Southern hypocenter at several locations. Records are color-coded by rupture model: KOBE/Sekiguchi et al (2000) South 0 10 20 Down Dip (km) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 slip (m) KOBE/Wald (1997) South hypocenter 0 10 20 Down Dip (km) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 slip (m) KOBE/Zeng & Anderson (2000) South 0 10 20 Down Dip (km) 0 10 20 30 40 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 slip (m) -122˚30' -122˚00' -121˚30' 37˚30' 38˚00' 0.0 0.1 0.6 1.1 3.4 8.1 16.0 31.0 60.0 116.0 150.0 200.0 Peak Ground Velocity, cm/s KOBE/Zeng & Anderson (2000) South -122˚30' -122˚00' -121˚30' 37˚30' 38˚00' 0.0 0.1 0.6 1.1 3.4 8.1 16.0 31.0 60.0 116.0 150.0 200.0 Peak Ground Velocity, cm/s KOBE/Sekiguchi et al (2000) South -122˚30' -122˚00' -121˚30' 37˚30' 38˚00' KOBE/Wald (1997) South hypocenter fault rupture epicenter 0.0 0.1 0.6 1.1 3.4 8.1 16.0 31.0 60.0 116.0 150.0 Peak Ground Velocity, cm/s MM Intensity Damage Shaking light mod. strong str/sev I none v. light none none II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X >X none light mod. heavy very heavy weak weak not felt extreme severe violent md/hv San Jose fault parallel fault normal ~ 45 cm/s East of San Jose fault parallel fault normal ~ 20 cm/s Fremont ~ 30 cm/s Sunol ~ 45 cm/s -123˚00' -122˚30' -122˚00' -121˚30' -121˚00' 37˚00' 37˚30' 38˚00' 38˚30' Oakland San Leandro San Ramon Livermore San Jose Lafayette Hayward East of San Jose Fremont Sunol Wald (1996) Sekiguchi et al (2000) Zeng & Anderson (2000) BDSN NHFN USGS Absolute time and amplitude scaling

Earthquake Ground Motion in the San Francisco Bay Area ... · Using Three-Dimensional Finite Difference Simulations Arthur Rodgers1 and Anders Petersson2 [email protected] [email protected]

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Earthquake Ground Motion in the San Francisco Bay Area ... · Using Three-Dimensional Finite Difference Simulations Arthur Rodgers1 and Anders Petersson2 rodgers7@llnl.gov andersp@llnl.gov

Earthquake Ground Motion in the San Francisco Bay Area Using Three-Dimensional Finite Difference SimulationsArthur Rodgers1 and Anders Petersson2

[email protected] [email protected], Earth and Energy Division and 2Center for Applied Scientific ComputingLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Avenue, Livermore, CA 94551 USA

Simulations were performed using LLNL-developed WPP code, the USGS 3D seismic velocity model for the San Francisco Bay Area (Brocher et al., 2006) and parallel computers operated by Livermore Computing at LLNL.

Piedmont 2007/07/20 Earthquake

Simulation of the 2007 July 20 Piedmont earthquake was done with the WPP code for 100 km x 100 km x 30 km volume with 100 m grid spacing for accurate synthetics to 0.5 Hz. Seismograms were obtained from the NCEDC for the Berkeley Digital Seismic Network (BDSN, blue triangles), Northern Hayward Fault Network (NHFN, yellow) and strong-motion instruments of the USGS Northern CA Network (green).

Comparison of observed and synthstic seismograms shows good agreement in general with satisfactory prediction of amplitudes and waveform complexity. Longer paths (> 10 km) often show the synthetics arriving ahead of the data, consistent with an earlier study (Rodgers et al., BSSA 2008).

-122˚30' -122˚00' -121˚30'

37˚30'

38˚00'BK.BDM

BK.JRSC

BK.WENL

BK.VALB

NC.CAG

NC.CPM

N

N

computational domain

NC.CLCB

WPP is an open-source anelastic finite difference code that runs on single or multiple processors. It’s been compiled and run on Linux, AIX and Mas OS X platforms. It can represent single or multiple point force and/or moment tensor sources. WPP features mesh refinement in the vertical direction to greatly im-prove memory and computational efficiency. We will soon have a version with non-planar free surface topography.

WPP is available to all free of charge. It can be requested and downloaded from https://computation.llnl.gov/casc/serpentine/

NC.CAG NC.CPM BK.VALBNC.CLCB

BK.WENLBK.BDMBK.JRSC

Absolute time and amplitude scaling

Hayward Fault Scenario EarthquakesWe performed simulations of scenario earthquakes on the Hayward Fault using re-ported finite rupture models from the 1995/01/17 (M 7) Kobe, Japan strike-slip earth-quake. We used finite source models from:

Wald (1996) Mw = 6.92 Sekiguchi et al. (2000) Mw = 7.02 Zeng and Anderson (2000) Mw = 6.90

Finite source models were obtained from the database maintained by Martin Mai (http://www.seismo.ethz.ch/srcmod). Simulations were performed using WPP with a 150 km x 100 km x 50 km volume with 100 m grid spacing and minimum shear veloc-ity of 500 m/s for accurate synthetics to 0.5 Hz. Seismograms were computed on the grid of stations surrounding the fault, shown below.

Horizontal component ground velocity seismograms for three rupture models with a Southern hypocenter at several locations. Records are color-coded by rupture model:

KOBE/Sekiguchi et al (2000) South

0

10

20

Dow

n D

ip (k

m)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5

slip (m)

KOBE/Wald (1997) South hypocenter

0

10

20

Dow

n D

ip (k

m)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5

slip (m)

KOBE/Zeng & Anderson (2000) South

0

10

20

Dow

n D

ip (k

m)

0 10 20 30 40

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

slip (m)

-122˚30' -122˚00' -121˚30'

37˚30'

38˚00'

0.0 0.1 0.6 1.1 3.4 8.1 16.0 31.0 60.0 116.0 150.0 200.0Peak Ground Velocity, cm/s

KOBE/Zeng & Anderson (2000) South

-122˚30' -122˚00' -121˚30'

37˚30'

38˚00'

0.0 0.1 0.6 1.1 3.4 8.1 16.0 31.0 60.0 116.0 150.0 200.0Peak Ground Velocity, cm/s

KOBE/Sekiguchi et al (2000) South

-122˚30' -122˚00' -121˚30'

37˚30'

38˚00'

KOBE/Wald (1997) South hypocenter

faultrupture

epicenter

0.0 0.1 0.6 1.1 3.4 8.1 16.0 31.0 60.0 116.0 150.0Peak Ground Velocity, cm/s

MM Intensity

Damage

Shaking light mod. strong str/sev

I

none v. lightnone none

II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X >X

none light mod. heavy very heavy

weak weaknot felt extremesevere violent

md/hv

San Josefault

parallel

faultnormal

~ 45 cm/s

East of San Jose

faultparallel

faultnormal

~ 20 cm/s

Fremont

~ 30 cm/s

Sunol

~ 45 cm/s

-123˚00' -122˚30' -122˚00' -121˚30' -121˚00'

37˚00'

37˚30'

38˚00'

38˚30'

Oakland

San Leandro

San Ramon

Livermore

San Jose

Lafayette

Hayward

East of San Jose

FremontSunol

Wald (1996) Sekiguchi et al (2000) Zeng & Anderson (2000)

BDSNNHFNUSGS

Absolute time and amplitude scaling