30
Economics of abiotic resources

Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

Economics of abiotic resources

Page 2: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

Non-renewables

• Fossil Fuels

• Minerals

• Land

Page 3: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

The Hubbert curve-discovery

Page 4: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

The Hubbert curve-production

Page 5: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

The Hubbert curve (cont.)

• Production requires discovery• Peak discovery year was 1969

• Operating at net deficit since 1980s

– Depends to some extent on how you measure reserves

Page 6: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

Price trends of oil

Page 7: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

Why aren’t oil prices increasing?

• Scarcity effect and information effect

• Traditional theory

• A dose of reality

Page 8: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

Scarcity effect vs. information effect

• Discovery is followed by production

• Production increases scarcity• Discovery provides information,

increases known reserves

• Information can counterbalance use=depletion for a time

Page 9: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

Marginal extraction costs

• Easiest to extract deposits extracted first, therefore should become increasingly expensive to extract. Why then do resources get cheaper?– Are easiest to extract deposits discovered first?– What has happened to the size of discoveries over

time?

• Technology can reduce costs• Energy costs of extraction increase, more

limiting than financial costs.

• What does this tell us about Exhaustibility?

Page 10: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

Efficient extraction- Static efficiency

• Maximize profits in current time period• Increasing marginal extraction cost

Page 11: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

What about scarcity?

Marginal extraction cost increases over time

Page 12: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

Efficient extractionDynamic efficiency

• What happens when the resource starts to run out?

• Does it make sense to produce for zero profit in this time period?

• Profit maximizing extraction in this time period while accounting for profits in future time periods

• Maximization of Net Present Value

Page 13: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

Intertemporal valuation and discounting

• What is discounting?– Compounded interest in reverse.– What would you rather have, $1000 now or $1000

in five years? Why?

– How economists value future benefits now

• Discount rate– Many justifications for discounting, therefore many

possible rates

• Discount factor: (1/(1+r))t

Page 14: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

Example

year income DF w/10% DR

value ofincome

10%growth in

I0 $100 1.00 $100.00 $38.551 $100 0.91 $90.91 $42.412 $100 0.83 $82.64 $46.653 $100 0.75 $75.13 $51.324 $100 0.68 $68.30 $56.455 $100 0.62 $62.09 $62.096 $100 0.56 $56.45 $68.307 $100 0.51 $51.32 $75.138 $100 0.47 $46.65 $82.649 $100 0.42 $42.41 $90.91

10 $100 0.39 $38.55 $100.00

Page 15: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

How is discounting used?

Cost-Benefit Analysis: NPV=(Bt-Ct)/(1+r)t

Page 16: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

Justifications for discounting

• opportunity cost – Returns on investments

• Time preference for consumption– Impatience

– Eat drink and be merry, for tomorrow we die

– Consumer sovereignty

– Theoretically equivalent to opportunity cost

Page 17: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

User cost• If oil supplies are finite, then if we extract and use

oil now, that reduces the amount left to extract and sell in the future.

• Assumptions: – Use = depletion = growing scarcity– price reflects scarcity– Prices are increasing over time

• If we extract the resource now, we lose the opportunity to extract it in the future, at which time it will have a higher price. The value of this lost opportunity for future profits is User Cost. It is a real cost of production.

• User Cost= opportunity cost of producing now instead of in the future

Page 18: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

Marginal user cost• Marginal User Cost = opportunity cost of

producing one more barrel• The more we extract now, the lower the price is in

the current period (greater current supply=lower current price)

• The more we extract now, the less we have next year, and the higher next year’s price will be (lower future supply= higher future price)

• This means that each additional unit of production has a higher user cost than than the previous unit, so MUC is increasing with total production.

Page 19: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

MUC and production by firm

The individual producer takes prices as fixed, and produces until marginal benefit (price) = marginal private cost

Page 20: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

Other definitions (meanings) of Marginal user cost

• Marginal user cost = user cost from additional unit

• User cost is value of resource in the ground– Resource has value because it is scarce. Remember

diamond water paradox

• User cost is unearned economic profit– No one created resource in ground, therefore profit

unearned

• User cost = royalty (how much resource owner can charge producer)

Page 21: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

How fast should MUC increase?

• $$ in future worth less than $$ in present

• NCE: In profit maximizing equilibrium, MUC increases at same rate as discount rate

Pt = MECt + MUC0(1+r)t

•Treat resource as an investment•If MUC increases slower than interest rate in bank (discount rate), then extract resource now and invest profit in the bank•If MUC increases faster than interest rate in bank, then leave the resource in the ground as a more profitable investment

Page 22: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

Can we measure marginal user cost?

• Theoretically, MUC = price - extraction cost

• For this to be true, each individual producer would have to know how much of the resource exists.

• Price is intersection of supply and demand, but we do not know the supply.

Page 23: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

Price in future determined by Supply and Demand: What is future demand?

• Substitutes reduce demand– Technological progress– Scarcity --> price increase --> innovation

– Backstop resource/technology.

– Justification for discounting

• Complements increase demand– Are technology and natural resources

substitutes or complements?

• Increasing size of economy or number of people increase demand

Page 24: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

Why do Prices fail to increase in Spite of Increasing Scarcity?

• Producers are ignorant of in ground supply• Price determined by above-ground scarcity • Money in the bank grows, resource prices do

not• If prices do not grow, there is no reason for

producer to leave resource in ground. • Producer should produce until increasing

marginal extraction cost = price (i.e. static optimization)

Page 25: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

Scarcity effect vs. Information effect

• Scarcity effect: as we use up the resource, we have less– Drives price up

• Information effect: the more we explore and extract, the more we learn– We can find more– It becomes cheaper to extract– Drives price down

• As scarcity effect comes to dominate information effect, producer will reduce production, price will rise, and producer will reduce production even more.

Page 26: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

Marginal External Costs

• Negative externalities– Extraction

– Waste disposal

• Socially efficient price should include marginal external cost

Page 27: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

Non-renewables and sustainability

• Binding constraints: source or sink?• Impact of non-renewable extraction and use• Can non-renewables increase optimal scale?

• Is the current population level dependent on non-renewables?

• Solutions?

• Invest MUC (rent) from non-renewables into renewable substitutes (and technology).

Page 28: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

Discount rates revisited

• Opportunity cost– Why does money in the bank grow?

• economic growth

– Ignoring environmental cost

– Treating natural resources as free good

– Discounting goods and services which can’t be invested

• Time preference for consumption– Interpersonal comparisons

Page 29: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

Ethical question of how much we have the right to consume

• Rights of future generations• Technology and the ethics of resource

depletion

• WHAT IS AN ALTERNATIVE?- maybe making sure that our use of exhaustible resources doesn’t leave future generations worse off, and not leaving future generations dependent on resources in imminent danger of exhaustion.

Page 30: Economics of abiotic resources. Non-renewables Fossil Fuels Minerals Land

Land

• Supply curve for land

• Who creates the value in land?

• How can society capture the value it creates?