22
Economics of Regulation Rate-of-Return Regulation 

Economics of Regulation Rate of Return

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

8/13/2019 Economics of Regulation Rate of Return

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/economics-of-regulation-rate-of-return 1/22

Economics of Regulation

Rate-of-Return Regulation 

8/13/2019 Economics of Regulation Rate of Return

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/economics-of-regulation-rate-of-return 2/22

Definition

 where Pi is the price of the ith service

qi is the quantity of the ith service

n is the number of services

s is the allowed rate of return

RB is the rate base; a measure of the value of theregulated firm's investment

8/13/2019 Economics of Regulation Rate of Return

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/economics-of-regulation-rate-of-return 3/22

Definition

Regulatory authority must

•  A. determine the allowed expenses, allowed RB

and s

• B. determine mix of prices that will achievethat revenue requirement

8/13/2019 Economics of Regulation Rate of Return

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/economics-of-regulation-rate-of-return 4/22

Practical Difficulties

 A. Determining COC.

• 1. Needs a fair rate of return that is sufficiently

high to attract new investment for newprojects. To economists this is the opportunitycost of capital.

2. Important court case - Hope Natural Gas(1944) stated that return "should becommensurate with return on investments inother enterprises having corresponding risks."

to maintain its credit and to attract capital."

8/13/2019 Economics of Regulation Rate of Return

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/economics-of-regulation-rate-of-return 5/22

Practical Difficulties

[continued...]  And "should be sufficient to assureconfidence in the financial integrity of the

enterprise so as• 3. Firms finance through bonds and stock. COC

of bonds is easy - paid a fixed interest rate.Shareholder equity return is harder. Riskinessis an element

• 4. Methods of determining ROE - DCF; CE; E-Pratio; CAPM.

8/13/2019 Economics of Regulation Rate of Return

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/economics-of-regulation-rate-of-return 6/22

Practical Difficulties

• 5. Discounted Cash Flow - DCF -

 where P is the price of the stock , D1 is expected dividend in year 1, D2 is expected dividend in year 2, Di is expected dividendin year I

k is cost of equity capital

this solves to K = D sub 1 over P + g

or current dividend yield e.g. 8% plus constant growth rate of

dividends e.g. 7% so that k = 15%.

8/13/2019 Economics of Regulation Rate of Return

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/economics-of-regulation-rate-of-return 7/22

Practical Difficulties

6. Comparable earnings (Kolbe, Read & Hall,p. 41) aka comparable industry or

comparable risk - select a sample of firmsbelieved to be of comparable risk andcalculate ROE.

7. Earnings-Price ratio - r=E/P (simplifiedDCF]

8/13/2019 Economics of Regulation Rate of Return

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/economics-of-regulation-rate-of-return 8/22

Practical Difficulties

8. Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)

• E(ri) = rf + i * [E(rm) - rf]

•  where ri is the expected ROR for firm I

• rf is risk free ROR

• Bi is firms beta (measure of riskiness)

• rm market return for that level of riskiness

8/13/2019 Economics of Regulation Rate of Return

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/economics-of-regulation-rate-of-return 9/22

Practical Difficulties

8/13/2019 Economics of Regulation Rate of Return

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/economics-of-regulation-rate-of-return 10/22

Practical Difficulties

B. Determining Rate Base

• 1. Assets - Accumulated depreciation

• 2. How much is depreciation? Economicdepreciation versus accounting depreciation

• 3. What to do with appreciation?

8/13/2019 Economics of Regulation Rate of Return

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/economics-of-regulation-rate-of-return 11/22

Practical Difficulties

• 4. What are prudent investments?

"In May 1987, California PUC staff

recommended that of the $5.518 billion thatPG&E spent before commercial operation of theDiablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant only $1.150billion should be allowed to be collected inrates. The staff alleged that unreasonablemanagement was to blame for a large part ofthis cost overrun."

8/13/2019 Economics of Regulation Rate of Return

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/economics-of-regulation-rate-of-return 12/22

Practical Difficulties

C. Regulatory Lag - once new prices are set,they remain unchanged until the next rate

case. Hence, the period during whichprices remain fixed provides an incentivefor the company to be cost efficient.

8/13/2019 Economics of Regulation Rate of Return

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/economics-of-regulation-rate-of-return 13/22

Practical Difficulties

• 1. Rate cases usually involve significant resources(manpower and money); cost studies; demand studies,COC studies. Expensive to initiate. Typically last for 2

 years - need forward planning.

• 2. What happens to all those people between ratecases?

3. Usually initiated by the company. No incentive tobring rate case if COC falls, costs fall, etc.

8/13/2019 Economics of Regulation Rate of Return

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/economics-of-regulation-rate-of-return 14/22

Practical Difficulties

D. Rate Structure (Viscus p. 391)

• 1. Has to do with how prices vary across

customer classes & products.

• 2. Fully Distributed Cost (FDC) pricing

8/13/2019 Economics of Regulation Rate of Return

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/economics-of-regulation-rate-of-return 15/22

Practical Difficulties

Consider a two-product natural monopolyselling electricity to two classes of customers:

residential buyers X and industrial buyers Y.(They are different products because it islower voltage to residential customers).

 –  To produce X alone: Cx = 700+20X  

 –  To produce Y alone: C y = 600+20Y  

 –  To produce both: Cxy=1050+20X+20Y

 –  Joint production of X & Y is subadditive.

8/13/2019 Economics of Regulation Rate of Return

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/economics-of-regulation-rate-of-return 16/22

Practical Difficulties

Common costs are distributed on the basis ofsome physical measure of utilization such as

minutes, circuit-miles, cubic feet, or kilowatt-hours employed or consumed by each. Or theymay be distributed in proportion to the coststhat can be directly assigned to the various

services.

8/13/2019 Economics of Regulation Rate of Return

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/economics-of-regulation-rate-of-return 17/22

Practical Difficulties

Suppose some reasonable method leads to anallocation of 75% to product X and 25% to product Y.Then ACx  = 787.5/X + 20 and Ac y = 262.5/Y + 20.

Demand function: Px =100-X and P y=60-0.5Y , we get

Px =ACx =$31.5; X = 68.5; P y=AC y=$23.6; Y = 72.8

So FDC leads to TR=TC but not economically efficient.

Ramsey prices would be Px =30; P y=25; X = 70; Y = 70. 

Issues of fairness in pricing (more later)

8/13/2019 Economics of Regulation Rate of Return

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/economics-of-regulation-rate-of-return 18/22

Practical Difficulties

E. Incentive problems - no incentive toinnovate or reduce costs.

8/13/2019 Economics of Regulation Rate of Return

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/economics-of-regulation-rate-of-return 19/22

 Averch-Johnson Effect

 A. Profit = Revenue (K,L) - wL - rK subject to{R(K,L)-wL}/K=s

•  where w is wage rate, L is quantity of labor, r iscost of capital, K is quantity of capital, s isallowed rate of return.

8/13/2019 Economics of Regulation Rate of Return

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/economics-of-regulation-rate-of-return 20/22

 Averch-Johnson Effect

B. Key assumptions of the model

• 1. Firm seeks to maximize profit

• 2. Market cost of capital is constant

• 3. Allowed rate of return exceeds cost ofcapital (s>r)

• 4. No regulatory lag

8/13/2019 Economics of Regulation Rate of Return

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/economics-of-regulation-rate-of-return 21/22

8/13/2019 Economics of Regulation Rate of Return

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/economics-of-regulation-rate-of-return 22/22

 Averch-Johnson Effect

D. Simpler version

Profit = TRa-TC=(expenses + sK)-(expenses+rK)=(s-r)K. On every extra $ of Kthe firms earns s-r more.