1
CONTENTS Editor’s Choice David L. Turpin, Editor-in-Chief Psychiatry in orthodontics: Part 1. Typical adolescent psychiatric disorders and their relevance to orthodontic practice; Part 2. Substance abuse among adolescents and its relevance to orthodontic practice By Wendell W. Neeley II, Thomas Kluemper, and Lon R. Hays Our cover story in this issue is a unique two-part review of the psychiatric and substance abuse issues that can afflict young people. Adolescence is a time of rapid physical and mental development, and it is a time when many psychiatric diseases are first noticed. In Part 1, the authors review the psychiatric problems that are most often noted during the teen years. Does the fact that orthodontic treatment occurs regularly over the course of several years—including the teen years— bestow any special responsibility on clinicians? What is the orthodontist’s responsibility for recognizing prob- lems and making referrals? Part 2 of this article examines various types of substance abuse, and looks at diagnosis, options for referral, and potential orthodontic implications. Once again, what is the role of the orthodontic practitioner when recent data show that nearly 40% of all tenth graders across the United States will try an illicit drug? It is imperative that the orthodontist become familiar with the statistics of drug use, be aware of which drugs are “popular” at the moment, learn to detect signs of substance abuse, and know what steps to take to help patients who might have a substance abuse problem. Orthodontists and sleep-disordered breathing By Alan Lowe As our profession recognizes the importance of interac- tions between craniofacial form and overall health, orthodon- tists might be expected to become proficient in a broader range of health care issues. Under Canadian guidelines, patients who require oral appliances for treatment of snoring or obstructive sleep apnea are referred directly to an orth- odontist. Are orthodontists uniquely equipped to manage the more than 80 different oral appliances currently available to treat snoring and sleep apnea? If not, is this becoming an unmet need within the larger community? Alan Lowe’s commentary introduces 4 original research reports related to sleep apnea treatment. In a 2-part article, Almeida et al documented some of the changes observed in the dentition after long-term wear of oral appliances. It appears that the occlusal changes are predominantly dental in nature and occur after more than 2 or 3 years of wear. Marklund found a reduction in overjet over time associated with initial bite depth, type of device, and nasal congestion. Otsuka documented a better response to therapy in those posttitration subjects who exhibited a more anterior velopharyngeal wall, a larger radius of curvature of the airway, and an increase in velopharyngeal size. Orthodontists who treat patients with sleep-disordered breathing are often surprised at how grateful their patients are after only a few nights of uninterrupted sleep. Sub- stantially changing the quality of a patient’s life with an oral appliance can be a very rewarding experience. Factors influencing treatment time in orthodontic patients By Kirsty J. Skidmore, Karen J. Brook, W. Murray Thomson, and Winifred J. Harding At the end of an extended period of treatment, reviewing a patient’s chart will usually reveal the reasons treatment was delayed. What factors are typically related to excessive time in braces? And how valuable would it be to your practice if you could more accurately predict treatment time by using a small number of personal characteristics and treatment decisions? This study is a retrospective analysis of meticu- lously maintained treatment notes kept by a single practicing orthodontist. Factors found to adversely influence treatment time included maxillary crowding of 3 mm or more, a Class II molar relationship, and delayed extractions. Variables associated with patient cooperation included poor oral hygiene, poor elastic wear, bracket breakage, and brackets rebonded for repositioning. Every practitioner can find something for immediate use in this article. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:10A 0889-5406/$32.00 Copyright © 2006 by the American Association of Orthodontists. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.021 10A

Editor’s Choice

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Editor’s Choice

CONTENTS

Editor’s Choice

David L. Turpin, Editor-in-Chief

Psychiatry in orthodontics: Part 1. Typicaladolescent psychiatric disorders and theirrelevance to orthodontic practice; Part 2.Substance abuse among adolescents andits relevance to orthodontic practiceBy Wendell W. Neeley II, Thomas Kluemper, andLon R. Hays

Our cover story in this issue is a unique two-partreview of the psychiatric and substance abuse issuesthat can afflict young people. Adolescence is a time ofrapid physical and mental development, and it is a timewhen many psychiatric diseases are first noticed. InPart 1, the authors review the psychiatric problems thatare most often noted during the teen years. Does thefact that orthodontic treatment occurs regularly over thecourse of several years—including the teen years—bestow any special responsibility on clinicians? What isthe orthodontist’s responsibility for recognizing prob-lems and making referrals?

Part 2 of this article examines various types ofsubstance abuse, and looks at diagnosis, options forreferral, and potential orthodontic implications. Onceagain, what is the role of the orthodontic practitionerwhen recent data show that nearly 40% of all tenthgraders across the United States will try an illicit drug?It is imperative that the orthodontist become familiarwith the statistics of drug use, be aware of which drugsare “popular” at the moment, learn to detect signs ofsubstance abuse, and know what steps to take to helppatients who might have a substance abuse problem.

Orthodontists and sleep-disorderedbreathingBy Alan Lowe

As our profession recognizes the importance of interac-tions between craniofacial form and overall health, orthodon-tists might be expected to become proficient in a broaderrange of health care issues. Under Canadian guidelines,patients who require oral appliances for treatment of snoring

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:10A0889-5406/$32.00Copyright © 2006 by the American Association of Orthodontists.

doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.12.021

10A

or obstructive sleep apnea are referred directly to an orth-odontist. Are orthodontists uniquely equipped to manage themore than 80 different oral appliances currently available totreat snoring and sleep apnea? If not, is this becoming anunmet need within the larger community? Alan Lowe’scommentary introduces 4 original research reports related tosleep apnea treatment.

In a 2-part article, Almeida et al documented someof the changes observed in the dentition after long-termwear of oral appliances. It appears that the occlusalchanges are predominantly dental in nature and occurafter more than 2 or 3 years of wear. Marklund found areduction in overjet over time associated with initialbite depth, type of device, and nasal congestion. Otsukadocumented a better response to therapy in thoseposttitration subjects who exhibited a more anteriorvelopharyngeal wall, a larger radius of curvature of theairway, and an increase in velopharyngeal size.

Orthodontists who treat patients with sleep-disorderedbreathing are often surprised at how grateful their patientsare after only a few nights of uninterrupted sleep. Sub-stantially changing the quality of a patient’s life with anoral appliance can be a very rewarding experience.

Factors influencing treatment time inorthodontic patientsBy Kirsty J. Skidmore, Karen J. Brook,W. Murray Thomson, and Winifred J. Harding

At the end of an extended period of treatment,reviewing a patient’s chart will usually reveal the reasonstreatment was delayed. What factors are typically relatedto excessive time in braces? And how valuable would it beto your practice if you could more accurately predicttreatment time by using a small number of personalcharacteristics and treatment decisions?

This study is a retrospective analysis of meticu-lously maintained treatment notes kept by a singlepracticing orthodontist. Factors found to adverselyinfluence treatment time included maxillary crowdingof 3 mm or more, a Class II molar relationship, anddelayed extractions. Variables associated with patientcooperation included poor oral hygiene, poor elasticwear, bracket breakage, and brackets rebonded forrepositioning. Every practitioner can find something for

immediate use in this article.