1
RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2015 www.PosterPresentations.com eDNA and Anadromous Fish: A Comparison of PCR and Metabarcoding to Detect Returns in NH Rivers Jessica Haskins, Devin Thomas, Alison Watts, W. Kelley Thomas, Alyson Eberhardt University of New Hampshire: Departments of Genetics, Computer Science, Civil & Environmental Engineering, Cellular & Molecular Biology, New Hampshire Sea Grant Sampling and analysis steps Environmental DNA (eDNA) is DNA from an environmental sample such as water, soil or air. eDNA can come from entire microorganisms (like algae or bacteria) or fragments of tissue. eDNA methods can identify what species are in a system without requiring field researchers to capture and identify living organisms. Project Overview Tracking Fish Returns In May 2018, we began collecting water samples from sites on the Oyster and Lamprey Rivers. We collect samples at the head of tide dams above and below the dams. There are three sites on the Lamprey River; two above the McCallan dam and one below. There are six sites on the Oyster River; one directly above the Mill Pond dam, two below, and three farther upstream. American eel and river herring are of particular interest because they move between freshwater and the ocean throughout their lifetime. NH Fish and Game manages a fish ladder at the McCallan dam and they count river herring that go up the river. NH Fish and Game also counts river herring that pass the Mill Pond fish ladder. NH Sea Grant collaborates with Fish and Game at the Mill Pond dam where volunteers count glass eels and move them over the dam so they can continue their journey up the river. Next Step: Quantifying Species in eDNA with Quantitative PCR Digital PCR (dPCR) quantifies DNA of a target species in a sample. We designed a primer set to amplify American eel DNA only. dPCR provides quicker results that require less bioinformatic analysis. The table to the right shows the results of a trial on a subset of samples to compare the detection of American eel. The samples used here are all from Site 1 on the Oyster River, which is below the dam. The check marks indicate that American eel DNA was detected in the sample. Given this small dataset, dPCR and metabarcoding seem to yield very similar detection results. Initial Results Filter and extract DNA Collect field sample Analyze for target species There are two common methods of analyzing eDNA for species identification: metabarcoding and single species PCR. Metabarcoding identifies multiple species, but is more complex to interpret. Single species PCR (qPCR or dPCR), is quicker and cheaper, but limited to one species at a time. Newmarket, NH Durham, NH Project Partners: South Slough NERR – Bree Yednock, Shon Schooler Well NERR – Jason Goldstein Great Bay NERR – Chris Peter, Cory Riley, Steve Miller This work is sponsored by: The National Estuarine Research Reserve System Science Collaborative, which supports collaborative research that addresses coastal management problems important to the reserves. The Science Collaborative is funded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and managed by the University of Michigan Water Canter (NAI4NOS4190145). Funding was provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration College Sea Grant program through the New Hampshire Sea Grant project R/HCE-7 (#NA18OAR170090). Digital PCR vs. Metabarcoding We compared our eDNA results to the fish counts recorded by NH Fish and Game. We began detecting river herring at the same time they began to migrate in May, and continued to detect them after Fish and Game stopped detecting them, which is likely due to fish living upstream. American eel were mostly detected in the Oyster River. We identified them throughout the sampling period, while Fish and Game saw a peak during the glass eel migration in spring. eDNA methods cannot distinguish between eels at different stages in their lifecycle. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is another species-specific quantification method. qPCR machines are more widely available than dPCR machines. Once qPCR is optimized to use with the American eel primers, the results will be compared to metabarcoding and dPCR. qPCR will be a valuable tool if the results are sufficient for fish monitoring. Advanced eDNA monitoring provides an effective, low cost method of evaluating the impact of tidal boundaries on aquatic species’ migration and biodiversity. We will assess the presence of American eel and river herring at fish ladders and upstream locations, and compare the results to existing sampling and assessment programs. Various eDNA methods will be compared as well. The results will support development of protocols to provide effective and reliable information on fish passage. Objectives

eDNA and Anadromous Fish: A Comparison of PCR and ... · NH Fish and Game also counts river herring that pass the Mill Pond fish ladder. NH Sea Grant collaborates with Fish and Game

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: eDNA and Anadromous Fish: A Comparison of PCR and ... · NH Fish and Game also counts river herring that pass the Mill Pond fish ladder. NH Sea Grant collaborates with Fish and Game

QU ICK START ( con t . )

How to change the template color theme You can easily change the color theme of your poster by going to the DESIGN menu, click on COLORS, and choose the color theme of your choice. You can also create your own color theme. You can also manually change the color of your background by going to VIEW > SLIDE MASTER. After you finish working on the master be sure to go to VIEW > NORMAL to continue working on your poster.

How to add Text The template comes with a number of pre-formatted placeholders for headers and text blocks. You can add more blocks by copying and pasting the existing ones or by adding a text box from the HOME menu.

Text size

Adjust the size of your text based on how much content you have to present. The default template text offers a good starting point. Follow the conference requirements.

How to add Tables To add a table from scratch go to the INSERT menu and click on TABLE. A drop-down box will help you select rows and columns.

You can also copy and a paste a table from Word or another PowerPoint document. A pasted table may need to be re-formatted by RIGHT-CLICK > FORMAT SHAPE, TEXT BOX, Margins.

Graphs / Charts You can simply copy and paste charts and graphs from Excel or Word. Some reformatting may be required depending on how the original document has been created.

How to change the column configuration RIGHT-CLICK on the poster background and select LAYOUT to see the column options available for this template. The poster columns can also be customized on the Master. VIEW > MASTER.

How to remove the info bars

If you are working in PowerPoint for Windows and have finished your poster, save as PDF and the bars will not be included. You can also delete them by going to VIEW > MASTER. On the Mac adjust the Page-Setup to match the Page-Setup in PowerPoint before you create a PDF. You can also delete them from the Slide Master.

Save your work Save your template as a PowerPoint document. For printing, save as PowerPoint or “Print-quality” PDF.

Print your poster When you are ready to have your poster printed go online to PosterPresentations.com and click on the “Order Your Poster” button. Choose the poster type the best suits your needs and submit your order. If you submit a PowerPoint document you will be receiving a PDF proof for your approval prior to printing. If your order is placed and paid for before noon, Pacific, Monday through Friday, your order will ship out that same day. Next day, Second day, Third day, and Free Ground services are offered. Go to PosterPresentations.com for more information.

Student discounts are available on our Facebook page. Go to PosterPresentations.com and click on the FB icon.

©2013PosterPresentations.com2117FourthStreet,[email protected]

(—THIS SIDEBAR DOES NOT PRINT—) DES I G N G U I DE

This PowerPoint 2007 template produces a 36”x48” presentation poster. You can use it to create your research poster and save valuable time placing titles, subtitles, text, and graphics. We provide a series of online tutorials that will guide you through the poster design process and answer your poster production questions. To view our template tutorials, go online to PosterPresentations.com and click on HELP DESK. When you are ready to print your poster, go online to PosterPresentations.com Need assistance? Call us at 1.510.649.3001

QU ICK START

Zoom in and out As you work on your poster zoom in and out to the level that is more comfortable to you. Go to VIEW > ZOOM.

Title, Authors, and Affiliations

Start designing your poster by adding the title, the names of the authors, and the affiliated institutions. You can type or paste text into the provided boxes. The template will automatically adjust the size of your text to fit the title box. You can manually override this feature and change the size of your text. TIP: The font size of your title should be bigger than your name(s) and institution name(s).

Adding Logos / Seals Most often, logos are added on each side of the title. You can insert a logo by dragging and dropping it from your desktop, copy and paste or by going to INSERT > PICTURES. Logos taken from web sites are likely to be low quality when printed. Zoom it at 100% to see what the logo will look like on the final poster and make any necessary adjustments. TIP: See if your school’s logo is available on our free poster templates page.

Photographs / Graphics You can add images by dragging and dropping from your desktop, copy and paste, or by going to INSERT > PICTURES. Resize images proportionally by holding down the SHIFT key and dragging one of the corner handles. For a professional-looking poster, do not distort your images by enlarging them disproportionally.

Image Quality Check Zoom in and look at your images at 100% magnification. If they look good they will print well.

ORIGINAL DISTORTED

Cornerhandles

Good

prin

tingqu

ality

Badprintin

gqu

ality

RESEARCH POSTER PRESENTATION DESIGN © 2015

www.PosterPresentations.com

eDNAandAnadromousFish:AComparisonofPCRandMetabarcodingtoDetectReturnsinNHRivers

JessicaHaskins,DevinThomas,AlisonWatts,W.KelleyThomas,AlysonEberhardtUniversityofNewHampshire:DepartmentsofGenetics,ComputerScience,Civil&EnvironmentalEngineering,Cellular&MolecularBiology,NewHampshireSeaGrant

PolymeraseChainReaction(PCR)isarapid,lowcostmethodofidentifyingasinglespeciesinasample.

Metabarcodingidentifiesmultiplespeciesbyusingabroadamplificationprimer,butismorecomplextoanalyze.

Sampling and analysis steps

Figure6.SamplesitesattheLampreyRiver,Newmarket,NH

Figure7.SamplesitesattheOysterRiver,Durham,NH.

2 1

In digital PCR the extracted DNA is divided into 20,000 micro-wells on a small chip. A species specific primer is added, and amplification in each well is digitally recorded (shown as blue in the chip image to the right). The luminescence in each well is recorded, and yields the response curve shown below.

Environmental DNA (eDNA) is DNA from an environmental sample such as water, soil or air. eDNA can come from entire microorganisms (like algae or bacteria) or fragments of tissue. eDNA methods can identify what species are in a system without requiring field researchers to capture and identify living organisms.

Project Overview

Lamprey River Upstream

Alewife Bluegill Common Shiner Cow Fallfish Golden Shiner

Human Ninespine Stickleback Rainbow Trout Redbreast Sunfish White Sucker Yellow Perch

Lamprey River Downstream

Alewife American Eel Black Crappie Bluegill Fallfish Golden Shiner Pumpkinseed Swamp Darter White Hake White Sucker

Oyster River Upstream

Bluegill Brook Trout Chain Pickerel Common Shiner Fallfish Golden Shiner

Human Pumpkinseed Rock Bass White Sucker Yellow Perch

Oyster River Downstream

Alewife American Beaver American Eel Atlantic Herring Atlantic Silverside Banded Killifish Black Crappie Bluegill Brook Trout Chain Pickerel Common Shiner Fallfish

Fourspine Stickleback Golden Shiner Human Pumpkinseed Rainbow Trout Rock Bass Sand Lance Swamp Darter White Hake White Perch White Sucker Yellow Perch

Tracking Fish Returns

What species can we detect with eDNA?

In May 2018, we began collecting water samples from sites on the Oyster and Lamprey Rivers. We collect samples at the head of tide dams above and below the dams. There are three sites on the Lamprey River; two above the McCallan dam and one below. There are six sites on the Oyster River; one directly above the Mill Pond dam, two below, and three farther upstream. American eel and river herring are of particular interest because they move between freshwater and the ocean throughout their lifetime. NH Fish and Game manages a fish ladder at the McCallan dam and they count river herring that go up the river. NH Fish and Game also counts river herring that pass the Mill Pond fish ladder. NH Sea Grant collaborates with Fish and Game at the Mill Pond dam where volunteers count glass eels and move them over the dam so they can continue their journey up the river.

•  The cohort of fish that we detect in the Lamprey River compares well with seine netting and electrofishing done by Fish and Game in the area.

•  We detect River Herring as they begin migrating, but not before. •  We continued detecting River Herring after Fish and Game stopped

seeing them likely due to fish living upstream of the dam

Next Step: Quantifying Species in eDNA with Quantitative PCR

Digital PCR (dPCR) quantifies DNA of a target species in a sample. We designed a primer set to amplify American eel DNA only. dPCR provides quicker results that require less bioinformatic analysis. The table to the right shows the results of a trial on a subset of samples to compare the detection of American eel. The samples used here are all from Site 1 on the Oyster River, which is below the dam. The check marks indicate that American eel DNA was detected in the sample. Given this small dataset, dPCR and metabarcoding seem to yield very similar detection results.

Initial Results

Filter and extract DNA Collect field sample Analyze for target species

Present Only Downstream of Dam

Anadromous Alewife

American Eel

Estuarine

White Hake

Atlantic Herring

Atlantic Silverside

Banded Killifish

Sand Lance

Fresh Water

Swamp Darter

Black Crappie

Fourspine Stickleback

Rainbow Trout

White Perch

American Beaver

There are two common methods of analyzing eDNA for species identification: metabarcoding and single species PCR.

Metabarcoding identifies multiple species, but is more complex to interpret.

Single species PCR (qPCR or dPCR), is quicker and cheaper, but limited to one species at a time.

•  We can select different primers to target different groups of organisms. •  For the results above we used a fish specific primer, amplifying a

region of the 12S gene. •  We have also used a broad 18S primer to target eukaryotes. •  With the broader range we lose our ability to consistently assign species

level taxonomy, but gain the ability to explore the food web.

Newmarket,NH

Durham,NH

Project Partners: South Slough NERR – Bree Yednock, Shon Schooler Well NERR – Jason Goldstein Great Bay NERR – Chris Peter, Cory Riley, Steve Miller This work is sponsored by: The National Estuarine Research Reserve System Science Collaborative, which supports collaborative research that addresses coastal management problems important to the reserves. The Science Collaborative is funded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and managed by the University of Michigan Water Canter (NAI4NOS4190145). Funding was provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration College Sea Grant program through the New Hampshire Sea Grant project R/HCE-7 (#NA18OAR170090).

Digital PCR vs. Metabarcoding

We compared our eDNA results to the fish counts recorded by NH Fish and Game. We began detecting river herring at the same time they began to migrate in May, and continued to detect them after Fish and Game stopped detecting them, which is likely due to fish living upstream. American eel were mostly detected in the Oyster River. We identified them throughout the sampling period, while Fish and Game saw a peak during the glass eel migration in spring. eDNA methods cannot distinguish between eels at different stages in their lifecycle.

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) is another species-specific quantification method. qPCR machines are more widely available than dPCR machines. Once qPCR is optimized to use with the American eel primers, the results will be compared to metabarcoding and dPCR. qPCR will be a valuable tool if the results are sufficient for fish monitoring.

Advanced eDNA monitoring provides an effective, low cost method of evaluating the impact of tidal boundaries on aquatic species’ migration and biodiversity. We will assess the presence of American eel and river herring at fish ladders and upstream locations, and compare the results to existing sampling and assessment programs. Various eDNA methods will be compared as well. The results will support development of protocols to provide effective and reliable information on fish passage.

Objectives