Upload
others
View
12
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
EDUA
RCTVEFp Republic of the Philippines Department of Education
Region V B
0Visi SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF CAMARINES SUR August 10, 2020
DIVISION MEMORANDUM No. Ls. 2020
CONTEXTUALIZATiON OF SELF LEARNING MODULES (SLM) FROM GRADE 1 TO GRADE 3
Assistant Schools Division Superintendent Chief Education Supervisors CID/SGOD Education Program Supervisors Public Schools District Supervisors Principals/School Heads (Elementary) All others concerned
TO:
1. In adherence to Regional Memorandum No. 36, s. 2020, entitled Regional Learningg Continuity Tasks and Guidelines, the SDO Camarines Sur initiates the contextualization of Self Learning Modules in Edukasyon sa Pagpapakatao (EsP) and Araling Panlipunan in Grade l to 3.
2. School districts shall facilitate the contextualization of SLMs which fall under these categories following the timeline set. a. Tagalog dialect - Del Gallego and part of Ragay and ipocot b. Bicol Central dialect 2nd, 3rd, 4th districts and part of 1st distri C. Rinconada dialect - Baao, Balatan, Bato, Bula. Nabua East, Nabua West d. Buhinon dialect Buhi North and Buhi South
Timeline Development and Self
Evaluation District Validation (with editor's
notes)
Division Quality Quarter Assurance
(with inventory of contextualized modules)
August 10-14, 2020 August 10-21, 2020
3rd August 10-Sept.11, 20204th August 10-Sept.25, 2020
August 17-18,2020 August 24-28, 2020 Aug.31-Sept.4, 2020 Sept. 14-15, 2020 Sept 28-29, 2020
August 19-21, 2020 lst
2nd
Sept. 16-18, 2020Sept.30-Oct.2.2020
3. Attached to this memo are a. Enclosure 1 - List of Writers, Illustrators. Editors/Validators and Quality Assurance Team b. Enclosure 2 Self Evaluation Tool, Format for the Editors' Notes
4. For information, guidance and compliance of all concerned.
LOIDA NIDEA, CESO V Schools Division Superintendent
Address: Freedom Sports Complex. San Jose, Pili, Camuriaes S Email deped camsur@deped gov ph
EDUKASYON SA PAGPAPAKATAO (EsP)
Enclosure 1 Division Memo no. s. 2020
NABUA EAST SLM WRITERS (GRADE 1 TO 3)
GRADE LEVEL WRITERS QUALITY ASSURANCE TEAM Antonia D. Villanueva
Meriam C. Aimazan Gina T. Toriente
Darlene B. Sapinoso
Rowela C. Ibarrientos
Janet N. Salcedo Joan C. Garfin
Anabelle D. Jacob Shirley . Moico
Jenny H. Moreno Genevieve V. Sabio Josephine F. Olaso
Dranreb E. Berja Reygie P. Pequeña Maria May i. Ebrada
Annalyn A. Floresca
Elena B. Garlando, MT Grade
Girlie D. Florece
Grade ll- Lea Placida T. Hugo, MT-I
Grade lll Mila T. Benegas, MT-
NABUA WEST SLM WRITERS (GRADE I TO 3)
Grade Level WRITERS QUALITY ASSURANCE TEAM Gina O. Risare
Rosemarie N. Belano Marivel F. Sta. Cruz Abegail O. Cantome
Karen Mae Q. Veridiano Helen V. Bellen Jezelle D. Abiar
Karen A. Bobis Grade 1
MT-I
Joyce D. Baluca Grade 2 Carissa B. Bona
MT-1 Doris N. Rian
Kareen Delgaco Netty P. Velasquez
Margie Kristine P. Andalis Catherine 0. Nierva
Juliet LI. Llorin
Maricel T. Asyao Maria Isabel C. Nagales
Myla Vita 6. Verango Grade 3
MT-I
EDU
KA
SYO
N SA
PAG
PAPA
KA
TAO
(EsP) t
hru
re 1 D
so
n A
Mem
o no. OL
s. 2
02
o
BIC
OL
CE
NT
RA
L S
LM
WIR
TE
RS
(GR
AD
E
I T
O 3
)
QUARTER 1 QUARTERR2
QUARTER 3 QUARTER 4
GR
AD
E 1
Writer
MODULE 1
Estrella A
. Marco
MO
DU
LE
2
Cyril S. Sargento M
ODULE 3 G
race V. O
rtega M
ODULE 4Jo
seph
ine C. Fausto
MODULE 5
Mauraly B
. Gueta
District
Writer
| San Fernando District
Estrella A. Marco
Cyril S. Sargento G
race V. O
rtega Josephine C. Fausto
District
Writer
San
Fernando DistrictE
strela A. Marco
Cyril S. Sargento Grace V. Ortega JosephineC
. Fausto M
auraly B
. Gueta
District
|San Fernando District
Calabanga West
Pili West District
Mag
arao
Lu
pi
Writer
District
Calabanga West
Pili West D
istrict |M
agarao
Calabanga West
Pili West D
istrict M
agara0
Estrella A. Marco
Cyril S. Sargento
Grace V. O
rtega
San Fernando Distric Calabanga W
est Pili W
est District
|Lu
pi
GRADE 2 M
ODULE 1 |L
eizel D. C
onstantino MODULE 2 M
arife M. Visaya
MODULE 3
Rosalyn N. Cañaveral
Camaligan
MODULE 4
Mary Joy A. D
elfino M
OD
ULE5
Loida R. N
amora
Writer
District
|San Fernando |San Fernando
Wri te
r D
istrict Leizel
D. Constantino
San Fernando W
riter D
istrict S
an Fernando San Fernando C
amaligan
Cam
aligan C
amaligan
Sipocot South
Writer
Jefferson A. B
urce Jefferson A. B
urce
District
Sip
oco
t North
Sip
oco
t North
|Leizel D. Constantino M
arife M
. Visaya_ Rosalyn
N. C
añaveral |M
ary Joy A. Delfino
Loida R. N
amora
Jefferson A. Burce
Marife
M. Visaya
San Fernando |Rosalyn N. Cañaveral
Cam
aligan Cam
aligan C
amaligan
Cam
aligan C
amaligan
Mary
Joy A. Delfino
Lo
ida R. N
amo
ra M
OD
UL
E6
GR
AD
E 3
Write
r D
istrict |C
aramoan N
orth |Lagonoy South
Write
r D
istrict C
aramoan N
orth Lagonoy South
Writer
Purita R
. Ram
os
Karen C. Del Valle
|Raquel A. San Andres
Leah C. Alano
District
Caram
oan North
Lagonoy South Tinam
bac North
Writer
Josephine C. Bigtas Sipocot South
Helen B. Lasic
District
MODULE 1 Purita R. Ram
os M
ODULE2 K
aren C. Del Valle M
ODULE 3 R
aquel A. San A
ndres T
inambac N
orth MODULE 4 Leah C. Aiano M
ODULE 5 Josephine C. Bigtas
MODULE 6
Helen B
. Lasic
Purita R. Ram
os K
aren C. Del Valle R
aqu
el A. S
an An
dres
Tin
amb
ac No
rth
Leah C. Alano
Sip
oco
t No
rth
Lupi
Sipocot South_ |Sipocot N
orth
Lupi
Lupi
QUALITY ASSURANCE TEAM
GERUMI S. SEÑAR
MARIA ALICIA L. BALCE
VIVIAN F RODRIGUEZ
MYRA A. LUMAME
CHRISTOPHER JAMES SJ. RECRE0 MARICEL
L ELPOS
SDO
-CA
M.sU
R
PILI WEST SIPOCOT NORTH
CA
NA
MA
N
CA
BU
SAO
CALABANGA
EAST
EDUKASYON SA PAGPAPAKATAO (ESP)
Enclosure 1 Division Memo noos. 2020
B.ALATN SLM WRITERs (GRADE I TO )
Grade Level WRITERS QUALITY ASSURANCE TEAM
Haxver Joy M. Arillas
Yoradyl N. Colecha
Ana Liza B. Estadilla
Julia D. Ruin Elsa C. Aslor
Leilanie I. Armante MT-I Grade 1
Cecilia B. Barra MT- Brian A. Paz
Margie B. Bergonia Mariano B. BorcelesS
Vilma S. Esplana Juvy T. Tigue
May Flor F. De Lima Dannica Jane P. Fuentes
Melanie B. Belen Isabel A. Regino Carlo L. Bataller
Bartoiome B. Tigue
Grade 2 Edna P. Lanuzo MT-I
Grace B. Borja MT
Grade 3 Consuelo M. Penol MT-
BATO SLM WRITERS (GRADE I TO 3)
Grade Level WRITERS QUALITY ASSURANCE TEAM Ma. Regina B. Buena
Ma. Victoria 0. Bustarga Joanne T. Gariplan Benardita P. Tuyay Rosa S. Apondar
Antonina M. Arevalo Rosa B. Fajardo Jhoan B. Colico Ruby L. Salmo Jasmin T. Regaspi
Sharon F. Tanay Gemma D. Azul Armie A. Bernaldez Cristina T. Viedor Josefa L. Espinola Regina B. Cerdon
Vilma S. Cangayo, MT- Emenilda G. Mesoga, MT- Neda S. Oiva, MT-1
Grade 1
Selma T. Yorobe, MT-Donna C. Laut, MT- Mary Anne B. Placides, MT-I Grade 2
Lucia B. Guanzon, MT-I Marites V. Cabrera, MT- Teresita L. Rubianes, MT-II Grade 3
Enclosure Na 2 to Diwsion Memoran dum No. s. 2020
The LRMDS Evauotion Tools with notations:
individuai Report Team Report
EVALUATION TOOL FOR CONTENT DepEd-developed Modules
Leaming Area Grade Level Title
Instructions:
1Carefuily reac he eaming resource (LR) page by page to evaluate the LR for compliance to stancards indicated n the criterion items under the six (6) factors below. ut a check max () in the appropriate column beside each citernon item. If your answer is
NO. Cite specic pages. briefly indicate the erors found, and give your recommendations in the attached Summary of Findings, Corections, and Review form. Write Not Appicabe (NA) for ased on te number of citerion items marked "YES" under each factor, mark the appropriate column to indicate f the LR complied or not to the standards.
For factors with items marked Not Applicable, count the total applicable criterion items and muitiply this with 75% to determine the cutoff for compliance.
ms that does not apply in the LR evaluated.
Standards/ Criterion Ite ms Yes No Factor I. inteliectual Property Rights Compliance 1 The leaming resource has no copyright violations. This means that all
the petures usedthe M were personally captured by the writer and/or information were token from he aiowed and reliable sources such as the 1) sites
of governrment ogenc es /oth gov.ph} like DepEd websites, LGU sites, DT, DOT; 2]
DepEd comman, 3 Open Eaucation Resource (OER); or 4] from those websites of private individuci or greup rur with official permission to use the materials from their sites: 5} jrom sources whcre writer died for more than 70 years; 6] public
documents like the Philipaine Constitution OZE Tisitemis nonaiegotiable) 2 The copyrighted texts and visuals used in the LR are cited. NOTE: Only
those identified in Item1
3 The copyrighted materials used in the LR are accurately cited. NoTE Only those identified in Item 1
4. The referen ces are properly cited in the Bibliography or references.NOTE: Only those identified in Itemi
Note: At least 3 cnterion items must be marked YES to indicate compliance to this factor
Factor lI. Learning Competencies
Not Complied Compiied
Content is consistent with the targeted DepEd Leaning Competencies (LCs) or the Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELC) intended for the leaming area and grade level. Indicate the code just after each competency used in the IM/LM
Note: The item must be marked YES to indicate compliance. Not Complied Complied
Factor ll. Instructional Design and Organization
The LR contributes to the achievement of specífic objectives of the learning area and grade level for which it is intended.
2. Sequencing of contents and activities within each lesson facilitates achievement of objectives
3. Content is suitable to the target leamer's level of deveiopment, needs, experience.
4. Content reinforces, enriches, and/ or leads to the mastery of the targeted earning competencies intended for the learming area and grade leve.
| 5. Content is logically developed and organized throughout the material (Lessons/activities are arranged from simple to complex, from observable to abstrat).
6 The LR contains useful introductions, reviews, summaries, and other devices that facilitate smooth progression from one lesson to another.
7 Development of lessons allows for review, comparison & integration w previous lessons.
8. Motivational strategies (e.g., overviews, advance organizers, puzzles, games, etc.) are provided.
9 The LR uses various teaching and learming strategies to meet individual differences/ leaming styles. (if applicable)
10. The LR develops higher cognitive skills (e.g., critical thinking skills,
creatvity, leaming by doing, problem solving) and 21" century skills. 11. The LR enhances the development of desirable values and traits such as:
(Mark the appropriate box with an "X" applicable for values and traits only)
11.1 Pride in being a Filipino 11.2 Scientific attitude and /reasoning
11.3 Striving for excellence 11.4 Love for country
11.5 Helpfulness, teamwork, 11.6 Unity
cooperation 11.7 Desire to learn new things 11.8 Honesty & trustworthiness
11.9 Ability to know right from wrong 11.10 Respect
11.11 Critical and creative thinking 11.12 Productive work
11.13 Others (Please specify) Note: At least 8 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate compliance to this factor. Factor V. Instructional Quality
Not Complied Complied
1. Content and infommation are accurate.
2 Content and infomation are up-to-date.
3 The LR is free from any social content violations
4. LR is free from factual errors.
5. LR is free from computational erors (if applicable)
6. LR is free from grammatical errors.
Note: At least 5 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate compliance to Not this factor. Complied Complied
Factor V. Assessment
1 The LR provides useful measures and information that help the teacher
evaluate learner's progress in mastering the target competencies. Assessments are aligned with the specific objectives and content.
3. The LR provides "self-checks ready-made achievement tests &/or review
activities 4 The LR provides variety of assessment types.
Assessments have clear demonstration/ examples, instructions, and/or rubrics to serve as guide on how these will be used.
6. Variety of activities within the LR are utilized to ensure active engagement of the learners.
Note: At least 5 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate compliance to this factor.
Not Complied Complied
Factor VI. Readability
Vocabulary level is adapted to target users' experience and understanding.
Length of sentences is suited to the comprehension level of the target user.
Sentences and paragraph structures are varied and appropriate to the target user
4. There is logical and smooth flow of ideas within a lesson and from lesson to lesson.
There is consistenty good use of transition devices to focus on the main topics and signal a change of topic.
6 Lessons, instructions, exercises, questions, and activities are clear to the
target user. Note: At least 5 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate compliance to
this factor. Not
Complled Complied
Recommendation: (Please puta check mark () in the appropriate box.)
Minor revision. This material is found compliant to the minimum requirements in all six factors.
Revision based on the recommendations included in the Summary of Findings, Corrections, and Review form and LR with marginal notes must be implemented
Major revision. This material is non-compliant to the requirements in one or more factors Revision based on the recommendations included in the Summary of Finding s, Comections, and Review form and LR with marginal notes must be implemented.
For field validation. This material is found compliant to all factors with NO corections.
I/ We certify that this evaluation report and the recommendation(s) in the summary report are my/ our own and have been made without any undue infiuence from others.
Evaluators(s)Signature(s) Date accomplished:
Individual Report Team Report
EVALUATION TOOL FOR DESIGN AND LAYOUT
DepEd-developed Learning Resource
Leaning Area: Grade Title
Instructions: 1. Carefully read the leaming resource (LR) page by page to evaluate the LR for compliance to
standards indicated in the criterion items under the four (4) factors below. 2. Put a check mark () in the appropriate column beside each criterion item. If your answer is
NO, cite specific pages, briefly indicate the errors found, and give your recommendations in
the attached Summary of Findings, Comections, and Review form. 3. Write Not Applicable (NA) for criterion items that does not apply in the LR evaluated.
4. Based on the number of criterion items marked YES" under each factor, mark the appropriatecolumn to indicate if the LR complied or not to the standards.
5. For factors with items marked Not Applicable, count the total applicable criterion items and
multiply this with 70% to determine the cutoff for compliance.
StandardsI Criterion Items Yes No Factor l. Physical Attributes a. Cover Page
1. Cover art is appropriate, relevant, and interesting. Use single art design or picturefor the cover. Using of collage of cover art or pictures is highly discouragedCover elements are corect and complete. (i.e., wl grade indicator & leaming area, book title & type (LM, TG), cover art, DepEd text entries, spine entries back cover entries)
b. Front Matter Pages All necessary elements are complete (e.g., title page, copyright page, table of
contents, and introduction I preface (optional).
3
Page numbers are set in lowercase roman numerals; centered at the bottom of the page; no page numbers on the title and copyright pages.
C. Inside Pages
Beginning page of the LR consistently falls on the right-hand page.
6. Pagination is set in Arabic numerals and centered at the bottom of the page. Spaces between letters, words, and paragraphs facilitate reading.
8. Page endings do not end with a hyphenated word or an awkward page turm. (i.e., there are at least two lines of text below a text head at the foot of a page.)
9. There is a maximum of only three consecutive hyphenated words in a paragraph. 10. Pages have no bad breaks which affect readability.
d. Back Matter Pages 1. Has useful back matter pages (e.g..glossary, bibliography, index, appendix, etc.)
Not Complied Note: At least 8 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate compliance to this factor. Complied
Factor I. Design and Layout 1. Consistency of elements (i.e., main heads, subheads, sections, and subsections are
consistenthy classified)Simple (i.e., does not distract the attention of the reader) Attractive and pleasing to look at
4. Adequate illustrations in relation to text. Follow the art-text ratio per grade level with K
to G1 (65%-359%), G2(60%-409%), G3(50%-50%), (40%%-6096), G5-12(30%-7096) Reference: Regiona! Memo No. 36, s. 2020
5. Hamonious blending of elements (e.g. Ilustrations & text) 6. Suitable to the target users Note: At least 4 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate compliance to this CompiedNot Complied factor. Factor Il. Typographical Organization (e.g, size of letters, choice of font, use of
boldface and italics, etc.)
Size of letters is appropriate for the target user. Refer to Regional Memo No. 36, s. 2020 2. Font styles used are appropriate for the target user and easy to read. Refer to
Regional Memo No. 36, 5. 2020
Size of letters and choice of font enable the target users to easily identify themes ideas and rank them in order of importance. Refer to Regional Memo No. 36, s. 2020 The use of boldface and italics are relevant and appropriate to the text
Note: At least 3 criterion items must be marked YES to indicate compliance to this factor. Complied Not Complied Factor V. Visuals (e.g., illustrations, photographs, maps, tables, graphs, etc.)
Supplement the text Clarify the concept /topic and faciitate comprehension
1.
Consistently clear in content and detail
Relevant to the leamers age, culture, and life situation
Sustain interest and do not distract the leamers attention Appropriately placed in the page and proportionately drawn in size
Property labelled/ captioned (if needed) Artistically appealing, simple, and easily recognizable Realistic and use appropriate color (optional) where needed
10. Colored visuals are set in greyscale for black-and-white reproduction 11 12.
Line drawings are not shaded to avoid poorly and blotchy printed pagess Ilustrations of animals and people are facing inside the page iltustrations of a process involving separate steps or actions have individual pictures or frames
3.
plied Note: At least 9 cnterion items must be marked YES to indicate compliance to this factor. ompu
Recommendation: (Please put a check mark () in the appropriate box.) Minor revision. This material is found compliant to the minimum requirements of all four factors.
Revision based on the recommendations included in the Summary of Findings, Corrections, ano
Review form and LR with marginal notes must be implemented.
Major revision. This material is non-compliant to the requirements in one or more tactor Revision based on the recommendations included in the Summary of Findings, Corrections, and Review form and LR with marginal notes must be implemented.
For field validation. This material is found compliant to all factors with NO corrections.
/ We certity that this evaluation report and the recommendation(s) in the summary report are my / our
own and have been made without any undue influence from others,
Evaluators(s):
Signature(s): Date accomplished:
Individual Sum
mary R
eport T
eam's
Summ
ary Report
Summ
ary of Findings, C
orrections, an
d R
eview
fo
r the D
ep
Ed
-dev
elo
ped
Learn
ing
Reso
urc
e
Leam
ing
Area:
Grade L
evel: T
yp
e o
f LR
:
Title
Acco
mp
lish th
is Su
mm
ary
Rep
ort b
ase
d o
n th
e m
argin
al no
tes in th
e LR
an
d th
e find
ing
s gu
ided
by
the criterio
n item
s in the ev
aluatio
n
too
ls for co
nten
t, lan
gu
ag
e, a
nd
desig
n a
nd
layo
ut. F
or e
ach
ero
r fou
nd
, write ch
ron
olo
gically
the p
ag
e n
um
ber a
nd
parag
raph
or line
nu
mb
er w
here
it was s
een
. Pro
vid
e a
desc
riptio
n o
f the e
rror a
nd
ind
icate
wh
eth
er th
e fin
din
g is a
co
nte
nt, la
ng
uag
e, o
r
layo
ut y
pe o
f ero
r (Refer to
the leg
end
belo
w). W
rite specific reco
mm
end
ation
s on
ho
w to
imp
rov
e the erro
rs fou
nd
. Pro
vid
e a final
reco
mm
en
datio
nb
ase
d o
n th
e d
ecision
mad
e o
n th
e accom
plish
ed ev
aluatio
n to
ols fo
r con
tent, lan
gu
age, a
nd
desig
n a
nd
layo
ut.
esig
n a
nd
Rem
ark
s (To b
e acco
mp
lished
by
the
development team
) P
aragraph L
ine / P
ag
e
Nu
mb
er (in
chronological o
rder)
Brie
f
Description
of E
rors
l T
ype o
f S
pecific
Reco
mm
en
datio
ns fo
r Im
pro
vin
g th
e
Erors/F
indings/Observations
Findings/
Ob
serv
atio
ns
No
t Imp
lem
en
ted
Im
plemented (Reasons/Justifications)
Erro
r
Legend: T
yp
e of E
ror: (C
for C
on
tent, L
for L
anguage, DL
for D
esign & L
ayout)
Oth
er F
indings: (Wnite ad
ditio
nal c
om
men
ts a
nd
recom
men
datio
ns n
ot captured in th
e ev
aluatio
n to
ols used.)
Fin
al Reco
mm
end
ation
: (Please put a ch
eck
mark () in th
e appropriate box.)
Minor
revision. Th
is material requires m
inor revision in the th
ree (3) focu
ses. Rev
ision
base
d o
n th
e reco
mm
end
ation
s in
clud
ed in th
is summ
ary report form
an
d L
R w
ith marginal n
otes m
ust b
e im
plemented.
Majo
r e
visio
n. T
his material requies m
ajor revision in at least one (1) focus. Revision b
ased on th
e recomm
endations in
clud
ed in th
is summ
ary report form
an
d L
R w
ith marginal n
ote
s mu
st b
e im
plemented.
Fo
r field
valid
atio
n. T
his m
aterial is fou
nd
compliant to all factors in th
e three fo
cu
ses w
ith NO
corections
(Please sig
n b
elow
an
d a
t the b
ack of each
prev
iou
s pag
e.)
1/W
e c
etify
that th
is sum
mary
of c
ore
ctio
ns (s) a
re m
y/ o
ur o
wn
an
d h
ave b
een
mad
e w
itho
ut a
ny
un
du
e in
fluen
ce from
oth
ers.
Evaluators/R
eviewers (s):
Signature(s): D
ate
acco
mp
lished
:
Referen
ces:
1] Learning R
eso
urc
e M
an
ag
em
en
t an
d D
evelo
pm
ent (LR
MD
S) Stan
dard
s
2] Regional M
em
o N
um
ber 3
6, s
. 20
20
- R
egional Learning C
on
tinu
ity T
ask
s an
d G
uid
elin
es
3] Co
ntin
uo
us Im
provement (CI) M
anu
al
4] Insights gained from
serie
s of trainings a
tten
ded
on
IM/LM
Developm
ent
Republic of the Philippines Department of Education
Reglon V DIVISION OF CAMARINES SUR
EDITORS' NOTESS
Module Writer: School/District:
GRADE/QUARTER MODULE NO. / TITLE MELC CORRECTIONS MADE
Signature over printed name of the Editor/Validator
Date
Address: Freedom Sports Complex, San Jose, Pil, Camarines Sur Email: deped.camsura deped.gov.ph Website: www.depedcamsur.com Phone No.: (telefax) 8713340