Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Lithuania Launch of EAGSeptember 15, 2106
Thomas Weko, Senior Analyst
Assisted by Hiroko Ikesako
and Kateryna Obvintseva
Education at a Glance
What is Education at a Glance?
LARGE
503 pages, 125 charts, 145 tables
LINKED
Data available at http://www.oecd.org./edu/education-at-a-glance-19991487.htm
WIDE RANGING
Who participates in education, what is spent on it, how education systems operate and what
results they achieve
MANY COUNTRIES (35 member countries, 11 partner countries)
A GLOBAL COLLABORATION OF THOUSANDS OF CONTRIBUTORS
Ministry of Education+Science (Ričardas Ališauskas, Rita Dukynaitė, Veronika Šiurkienė)
Statistics Lithuania (Gailė Dapšienė, Daiva Marcinkevičienė)
MOSTA (Julija Umbrasaitė)
National Agency for School Evaluation (Evaldas Bakonis)
IT Center (Eduardas Daujotis)
Around the world – 475 people from 41 countries who advised and reviewed this work
And how does Lithuania compare?
Good News. Wide Participation in Education…
Early Childhood
Secondary Schooling
Tertiary (Higher) Education
3 and 4 year-old enrollment rates in early childhood
education in Lithuania exceed EU (22) or OECD average
Enrolment rates at age 3 and 4 in early childhood education (2014)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Fra
nce
Belg
ium
Isra
el
Spain
No
rwa
y
Germ
any
Sw
ede
n
Ita
ly
De
nm
ark
Kore
a
Ne
w Z
eala
nd
La
tvia
Un
ite
d K
ing
dom
Slo
ven
ia
Japa
n
Ne
therl
and
s
Hu
nga
ry
Ru
ssia
n F
ed
era
tion
Lithu
ania
Port
ug
al
EU
22 a
vera
ge
Lu
xe
mbo
urg
OE
CD
avera
ge
Czech R
epu
blic
Fin
land
Slo
vak R
epub
lic
Austr
ia
Pola
nd
Ch
ile
Irela
nd
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Me
xic
o
Austr
alia
Bra
zil
Turk
ey
Sw
itzerl
and
Co
sta
Ric
a
Gre
ece
Enrolment rates at age 3 in early childhood educational programmes
Enrolment rates at age 3 in pre-primary education
Enrolment rates at age 4
%
Figure C2.1
Few Lithuanian adults left education before completing
upper secondary education -- below EU or OECD averages
Percentage of 25-34 year-old adults with below upper secondary education as their highest level of education, by gender (2015)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Indon
esia
Me
xic
o
Co
sta
Ric
a
South
Afr
ica
Turk
ey
Bra
zil
Spain
Port
ug
al
Co
lom
bia
Saud
i A
rabia
Ita
ly
Icela
nd
Ch
ile
Ne
w Z
eala
nd
No
rwa
y
Sw
ede
n
Belg
ium
OE
CD
avera
ge
De
nm
ark
Gre
ece
Lu
xe
mbo
urg
La
tvia
EU
22 a
vera
ge
Un
ite
d K
ing
dom
Ne
therl
and
s
Hu
nga
ry
Fra
nce
Germ
any
Austr
alia
Esto
nia
Fin
land
Lithu
ania
Austr
ia
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Irela
nd
Isra
el
Sw
itzerl
and
Slo
vak R
epub
lic
Ca
nad
a
Czech R
epu
blic
Pola
nd
Slo
ven
ia
Ru
ssia
n F
ed
era
tion
Kore
a
Total Men Women%
Figure A1.1
A greater share of Lithuanian adults 25-64 have completed
tertiary (higher) education than EU or OECD average
Percentage of 25-64 year-olds with tertiary education, by level of tertiary education (2015)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Ca
nad
a
Ru
ssia
n F
ed
era
tion
Japa
n
Isra
el
Kore
a
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Un
ite
d K
ing
dom
Austr
alia
Irela
nd
Fin
land
No
rwa
y
Sw
itzerl
and
Lu
xe
mbo
urg
Sw
ede
n
Icela
nd
Lithu
ania
Esto
nia
De
nm
ark
Belg
ium
OE
CD
avera
ge
Ne
therl
and
s
Spain
Ne
w Z
eala
nd
Fra
nce
EU
22 a
vera
ge
La
tvia
Austr
ia
Slo
ven
ia
Gre
ece
Pola
nd
Germ
any
Hu
nga
ry
Co
sta
Ric
a
Port
ug
al
Saud
i A
rabia
Czech R
epu
blic
Co
lom
bia
Slo
vak R
epub
lic
Ch
ile
Turk
ey
Ita
ly
Me
xic
o
South
Afr
ica
Bra
zil
Ch
ina
Indon
esia
Short-cycle tertiary Bachelor's or equivalent Master's or equivalent Doctoral or equivalent%
Figure A1.4
The enrolment rate of 20-24 year-olds in tertiary education is
among the highest in the OECD
Change in tertiary enrolment rates among 20-24 year-olds (2005 and 2014)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Kore
a
Slo
ven
ia
Pola
nd
Lithu
ania
Ch
ile
Turk
ey
Gre
ece
De
nm
ark
Spain
Czech R
epu
blic
Irela
nd
Ne
therl
and
s
Belg
ium
La
tvia
Fin
land
No
rwa
y
Austr
alia
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
EU
22 a
vera
ge
Esto
nia
OE
CD
avera
ge
Fra
nce
Ita
ly
Slo
vak R
epub
lic
Arg
entina
Ne
w Z
eala
nd
Port
ug
al
Ru
ssia
n F
ed
era
tion
Austr
ia
Ca
nad
a
Hu
nga
ry
Germ
any
Sw
ede
n
Sw
itzerl
and
Un
ite
d K
ing
dom
Indon
esia
Bra
zil
Me
xic
o
Isra
el
Ch
ina
Lu
xe
mbo
urg
2014 2005%
Figure C1.2
USING LOWER SHARE OF NATIONAL INCOME. Lithuania spends 4.4%
of its GDP on primary to tertiary education, the OECD average is 5.2%
Public and private expenditure on primary to tertiary education institutions as a percentage of GDP (2013)
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Co
sta
Ric
a
Un
ite
d K
ing
dom
Co
lom
bia
Ne
w Z
eala
nd
De
nm
ark
No
rwa
y
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Port
ug
al
Ca
nad
a
Isra
el
Ch
ile
Icela
nd
Kore
a
Belg
ium
Fin
land
Austr
alia
Ne
therl
and
s
Arg
entina
Sw
ede
n
Fra
nce
Irela
nd
Me
xic
o
Esto
nia
Turk
ey
Austr
ia
Slo
ven
ia
Pola
nd
La
tvia
Japa
n
Lithu
ania
Germ
any
Spain
Czech R
epu
blic
Ita
ly
Slo
vak R
epub
lic
Hu
nga
ry
Ru
ssia
n F
ed
era
tion
% of GDPPublic expenditure on education institutions Private expenditure on education institutions
OECD average (total expenditure)
Figure B2.1
With modest reliance on local government as the source of public
spending
Distribution of initial sources of public funds for education by level of government in primary, secondary and post-secondary non-tertiary education (2013)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Ne
w Z
eala
nd
Irela
nd
Esto
nia
Ch
ile
Ne
therl
and
s
Lu
xe
mbo
urg
Isra
el
Slo
ven
ia
Hu
nga
ry
Turk
ey
Co
lom
bia
Port
ug
al
Slo
vak R
epub
lic
Ita
ly
Lithu
ania
Me
xic
o
Austr
ia
Fra
nce
Kore
a
La
tvia
EU
22 a
vera
ge
OE
CD
avera
ge
Un
ite
d K
ing
dom
Fin
land
Austr
alia
Icela
nd
Belg
ium
Bra
zil
Japa
n
Spain
Czech R
epu
blic
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Arg
entina
Germ
any
No
rwa
y
Pola
nd
Sw
itzerl
and
Ca
nad
a
Initial funds from central level of government Initial funds from regional level of government
Initial funds from local level of government%
Figure B4.3
USD 5 100 is spent per student in primary education per
year, as compared to the OECD average of USD 8 500
Annual expenditure per student by educational institutions for all services in primary education (2013)
0
2 000
4 000
6 000
8 000
10 000
12 000
14 000
16 000
18 000
20 000
Lu
xe
mbo
urg
Sw
itzerl
and
No
rwa
y
De
nm
ark
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Austr
ia
Un
ite
d K
ing
dom
Sw
ede
n
Icela
nd
Belg
ium
Ca
nad
a
Slo
ven
ia
Japa
n
EU
22 a
vera
ge
Fin
land
OE
CD
avera
ge
Ita
ly
Ne
therl
and
s
Austr
alia
Germ
any
Irela
nd
Kore
a
Ne
w Z
eala
nd
Port
ug
al
Fra
nce
Esto
nia
Spain
Isra
el
Pola
nd
La
tvia
Slo
vak R
epub
lic
Hu
nga
ry
Lithu
ania
Czech R
epu
blic
Ch
ile
Bra
zil
Arg
entina
Tu
rkey
Me
xic
o
South
Afr
ica
Co
lom
bia
Indon
esia
USD
Figure B1.3a
USD 4 800 is spent per student in secondary education
per year, as compared to the OECD average of USD 9 800
Annual expenditure per student by educational institutions for all services in secondary education (2013)
0
2 000
4 000
6 000
8 000
10 000
12 000
14 000
16 000
18 000
20 000
Lu
xe
mbo
urg
Sw
itzerl
and
No
rwa
y
Austr
ia
Belg
ium
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Ne
therl
and
s
Un
ite
d K
ing
dom
Fra
nce
Sw
ede
n
Germ
any
De
nm
ark
Austr
alia
Irela
nd
Japa
n
Fin
land
Ne
w Z
eala
nd
Port
ug
al
EU
22 a
vera
ge
OE
CD
avera
ge
Icela
nd
Ita
ly
Slo
ven
ia
Kore
a
Spain
Czech R
epu
blic
Pola
nd
Esto
nia
La
tvia
Isra
el
Slo
vak R
epub
lic
Arg
entina
Ru
ssia
n F
ed
era
tion
Lithu
ania
Hu
nga
ry
Ch
ile
Bra
zil
Turk
ey
Me
xic
o
Co
lom
bia
South
Afr
ica
Indon
esia
USD
Figure B1.3b
USD 8 700 is spent per student in tertiary education per
year, as compared to the OECD average of USD 15 800
Annual expenditure per student by educational institutions for all services in tertiary education (2013)
0
5 000
10 000
15 000
20 000
25 000
30 000
35 000
40 000
45 000
Lu
xe
mbo
urg
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Un
ite
d K
ing
dom
Sw
itzerl
and
Sw
ede
n
Ca
nad
a
No
rwa
y
Ne
therl
and
s
Austr
alia
Japa
n
Fin
land
Germ
any
Austr
ia
De
nm
ark
Fra
nce
Belg
ium
OE
CD
avera
ge
EU
22 a
vera
ge
Isra
el
Ne
w Z
eala
nd
Irela
nd
Bra
zil
Spain
Slo
ven
ia
Esto
nia
Icela
nd
Ita
ly
Port
ug
al
Turk
ey
Czech R
epu
blic
Slo
vak R
epub
lic
Hu
nga
ry
Kore
a
Pola
nd
Lithu
ania
Ru
ssia
n…
La
tvia
Ch
ile
Me
xic
o
Co
lom
bia
Indon
esia
USD
Figure B1.3c
Annual expenditure per student in primary to tertiary institutions
is USD 6 000 compared to the OECD average of USD 10 500
Annual expenditure by educational institutions per student, by types of service, from primary to tertiary education (2013)
0
5 000
10 000
15 000
20 000
25 000
Lu
xe
mbo
urg
Sw
itzerl
and
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
No
rwa
y
Austr
ia
Un
ite
d K
ing
dom
Sw
ede
n
Ca
nad
a
Belg
ium
De
nm
ark
Ne
therl
and
s
Germ
any
Japa
n
Fin
land
Austr
alia
Fra
nce
EU
22 a
vera
ge
OE
CD
avera
ge
Icela
nd
Irela
nd
Ne
w Z
eala
nd
Slo
ven
ia
Ita
ly
Port
ug
al
Spain
Kore
a
Esto
nia
Isra
el
Czech R
epu
blic
Pola
nd
Slo
vak R
epub
lic
La
tvia
Lithu
ania
Ru
ssia
n F
ed
era
tion
Hu
nga
ry
Ch
ile
Turk
ey
Bra
zil
Me
xic
o
Co
lom
bia
Indon
esia
USD
Core services Ancillary services (transport, meals, housing provided by institutions) Total R&D
Figure B1.1
Cumulative expenditure on each student through primary and
secondary education is roughly half of the OECD average
Cumulative expenditure per student by educational institutions over the expected duration of primary and secondary studies (2013)
0
50 000
100 000
150 000
200 000
250 000
300 000
Lu
xe
mbo
urg
Sw
itzerl
and
No
rwa
y
De
nm
ark
Un
ite
d…
Austr
ia
Belg
ium
Sw
ede
n
Icela
nd
Ne
therl
and
s
Austr
alia
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Germ
any
Fin
land
Ire
land
EU
22 a
vera
ge
Ne
w Z
eala
nd
Ca
nad
a
OE
CD
avera
ge
Fra
nce
Slo
ven
ia
Port
ug
al
Ita
ly
Japa
n
Spain
Kore
a
Czech…
Pola
nd
Esto
nia
La
tvia
Slo
vak…
Lithu
ania
Hu
nga
ry
Ch
ile
Bra
zil
Turk
ey
Me
xic
o
Co
lom
bia
Indon
esia
USD
Primary education Lower secondary Upper secondary education
Figure B1.4
But challenges ahead
Class size is very small in Lithuania, both for primary and lower
secondary education
Average class size, by level of education (2014)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Ch
ina
Japa
n
Kore
a
Ch
ile
Indon
esia
India
Isra
el
Turk
ey
Me
xic
o
Bra
zil
Un
ite
d S
tate
s
Spain
Fra
nce
Ne
w Z
eala
nd
Germ
any
Austr
alia
OE
CD
avera
ge
Port
ug
al
Pola
nd
Czech…
Ita
ly
Austr
ia
Hu
nga
ry
EU
22 a
vera
ge
Sw
ede
n
Icela
nd
Slo
ven
ia
Fin
land
Lithu
ania
Slo
vak…
Un
ite
d…
Ru
ssia
n…
Lu
xe
mbo
urg
Esto
nia
La
tvia
Ne
therl
and
s
Lower secondary education Primary educationStudents
Figure D2.1
Student-teacher ratios in Lithuanian upper secondary education
are among the lowest in OECD
Ratio of students to teaching staff in upper secondary education, by type of programme (2014)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Indon
esia
Ch
ile
Un
ite
d K
ing
dom
Ne
therl
and
s
Ch
ina
Ne
w Z
eala
nd
La
tvia
Esto
nia
Fin
land
De
nm
ark
Hu
nga
ry
Slo
ven
ia
OE
CD
avera
ge
Germ
any
Turk
ey
EU
22 a
vera
ge
Slo
vak R
epub
lic
Fra
nce
Ita
ly
Kore
a
Czech R
epu
blic
Spain
Austr
ia
Belg
ium
Pola
nd
Lu
xe
mbo
urg
Lithu
ania
Bra
zil
Gre
ece
Irela
nd
Austr
alia
Sw
itzerl
and
Vocational programmes General programmesStudents
Figure D2.3
Student Teacher Ratio Is Low Table D2.2.
Ratio of students to teaching staff in educational institutions (2014)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Me
xic
o
Ch
ile
Tu
rke
y
Ko
rea
Ne
w…
Ne
the
rla
nd
s
Un
ited
…
Fra
nce
Un
ited
…
Jap
an
Ge
rman
y
OE
CD
…
Slo
va
k…
Sw
ed
en
Isra
el
Cze
ch
…
Sw
itze
rla
nd
Sp
ain
Italy
EU
22
…
De
nm
ark
Luxe
mbo
urg
Hu
nga
ry
Po
lan
d
Po
rtu
gal
Esto
nia
No
rwa
y
Be
lgiu
m
Fin
land
Austr
ia
Slo
ve
nia
Gre
ece
Latv
ia
Lith
uan
ia
Au
str
alia
Ca
nad
a
Ire
lan
d
Lower secondary Primary
The teaching workforce is much older than averageFigure D5.1
Age distribution of teachers in primary education (2014)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
ItalyGermanyLithuania
New ZealandEstonia
LatviaSweden
Netherlands1Austria
HungaryPortugal
Switzerland1Czech Republic
SpainDenmark
NorwayEU22 averageUnited States
JapanOECD average
FinlandSlovenia
Slovak RepublicChile
PolandFrance
Canada2,3BelgiumIreland1
IsraelLuxembourg
ChinaGreece
United KingdomBrazilKorea
TurkeyIndonesia
%
< 30 year-olds 30-39 year-olds 40-49 year-olds ≥ 50 year-olds
And the pay of the teaching workforce is low
The school year is especially shortTable D1.2.
Organisation of compulsory general education in public institutions (2016)
0
50
100
150
200
250
Isra
el
Jap
an
Austr
alia
De
nm
ark
Italy
Me
xic
o
Cze
ch
…
Ne
w…
Slo
va
k…
En
gla
nd…
Ko
rea
No
rwa
y
Sco
tlan
d…
Fin
land
Ge
rman
y
Sw
itze
rla
nd
Slo
ve
nia
Ch
ile
OE
CD
…
Belg
ium
…
Ca
nad
a
Hu
nga
ry
Au
str
ia
Tu
rke
y
Un
ited
…
EU
22
…
Po
lan
d
Be
lgiu
m (
Fl.)
Po
rtu
gal
Sw
ed
en
Esto
nia
Sp
ain
Latv
ia
Ice
lan
d
Luxe
mbo
urg
Lithuania
Ire
lan
d
Fra
nce
Gre
ece
Lower secondary Primary
2012 PISA results below OECD average
Mean scores of PISA 2012
0 200 400 600
MexicoChile
TurkeyGreece
IsraelHungarySweden
LithuaniaUnited States
Slovak RepublicSpain
ItalyPortugalNorway
LuxembourgIceland
United KingdomOECD average
FranceCzech Republic
New ZealandDenmarkSlovenia
IrelandAustralia
AustriaGermanyBelgiumPoland
CanadaFinlandEstonia
NetherlandsSwitzerland
JapanKorea
Math
0 200 400 600
MexicoChile
Slovak RepublicTurkeyGreece
LithuaniaSlovenia
IcelandSweden
IsraelPortugal
LuxembourgSpain
HungaryAustria
ItalyCzech Republic
DenmarkOECD average
United StatesUnited Kingdom
NorwayFrance
GermanyBelgium
SwitzerlandNetherlands
AustraliaNew Zealand
EstoniaPoland
CanadaIrelandFinland
KoreaJapan
Reading
0 200 400 600
MexicoChile
TurkeyGreece
IsraelSlovak Republic
IcelandSwedenPortugal
LuxembourgItaly
HungaryNorway
LithuaniaSpain
United StatesDenmark
FranceOECD average
BelgiumAustria
Czech RepublicUnited Kingdom
SloveniaSwitzerland
New ZealandAustralia
IrelandNetherlands
GermanyCanadaPolandKorea
EstoniaFinlandJapan
Science
PIAAC results below OECD average
Literacy proficiency by level
100 80 60 40 20 0 20 40 60 80
Jakarta (Indonesia)
Turkey
Chile
Italy
Greece
Spain
Slovenia
Israel
Cyprus¹ ²
Lithuania
France
Singapore
Northern Ireland (UK)
Ireland
Poland
Austria
United States
OECD average
Germany
England (UK)
Korea
Denmark
Czech Republic
Canada
Flanders (Belgium)
Slovak Republic
Russian Federation³
Estonia
Norway
New Zealand
Australia
Sweden
Netherlands
Finland
Japan
Level 2 Level 1 or below Level 3 Level 4/5
%
PIAAC results below OECD average
Numeracy proficiency by level
100 80 60 40 20 0 20 40 60 80
Jakarta (Indonesia)Chile
TurkeySpain
ItalyGreece
United StatesCyprus¹
IsraelIrelandFrance
Northern Ireland (UK)Poland
SloveniaEngland (UK)
KoreaLithuania
OECD averageSingapore
CanadaAustralia
Russian Federation²New Zealand
EstoniaGermany
AustriaCzech Republic
Flanders (Belgium)Slovak Republic
DenmarkNorway
NetherlandsSwedenFinlandJapan
Percentage of the population
Level 2 level 1 and below Level 3 Level 4/5
PIAAC results below OECD average
Problem solving by performance level
60 40 20 0 20 40 60
TurkeyGreece
ChileLithuania
PolandIreland
SloveniaSlovak Republic
Russian Federation³Israel
EstoniaNorthern Ireland (UK)
KoreaOECD average
United StatesAustria
Czech RepublicFlanders (Belgium)
JapanEngland (UK)
GermanyCanada
SingaporeAustraliaDenmark
NorwayNetherlands
FinlandSweden
New Zealand
Proportion of the population
Below Level 1 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
27
Lithuania Launch of EAGSeptember 15, 2106
Thomas Weko, Senior Analyst
Assisted by Hiroko Ikesako
and Kateryna Obvintseva
Education at a Glance
