Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
11/12/15
1
The SAT
SAT scores range from 200 to 800 with a median of 500. The standard deviation for a first-time test taker with an
expected score of 500 is ~33. How large a difference between two individual scores is
necessary for statistical significance?
The SAT
The expected value of two SAT scores must differ by more than 100 points to be significantly different.
0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08
0.1 0.12 0.14
400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800
Prob
abili
tiy
SAT
Comparing Two SAT Scores
Expected 500 Expected 610
The SAT Interpreted
The SAT score should use the AP’s scale: 1 to 5. The SAT norms grades across high schools. There are no correct answers to SAT questions. Test prep increases scores by gaming the test.
4
K12 What works, what doesn’t.
Malcolm Getz Vanderbilt Economics
Two Philosophies
1. Education fills empty vessels. 2. Education sparks curiosity.
The Goal
The education of other people’s children has significant value.
A. People are more productive in groups of educated people.
B. Markets and democracy work better with educated people.
11/12/15
2
7
Five Questions
1. Why focus on education now? 2. Will more spending improve outcomes? 3. Have tests produced gains? 4. How do we educate poor children? 5. Is privatizing effective?
8
#1 Why education now?
• The returns to schooling are high.
• Meritocracy emphasizes position.
• We spend less time at home.
9
The college-high school gap grew. Real Household Mean Income by Education
Mea
n H
H In
com
e (2
013
$s)
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015Year
under 9 9 to 12 yrHi SchoolBAMA
ProfDoc
10
We seek relative position.
• A positional race can be enervating. • We live in a meritocracy where educational
performance defines us. • Tournament play may discourage all but the top.
11
We spend less time at home. Female Labor Force Participation
Perc
enta
ge in
Wor
k Fo
rce
0102030405060708090
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010Year
Totl SingTotl Mard
Sing ch6-17Mard ch6-17
Sing ch0-6mard ch--6
12
1. Demand is rising.
We have powerful motives for wanting more quality in education.
11/12/15
3
13
#2 Will more spending improve outcomes?
What can we buy? What Pays?
14
Spending per student grew. Real Expenditure per Pupil
$/pu
pil (
2012
$s)
$0
$2,000
$4,000
$6,000
$8,000
$10,000
$12,000$14,000
1960 1980 2000year
Smooth
15
Teacher salaries haven’t grown. Average Teacher Salary US $2013
Elem
enta
ry &
Sec
onda
ry
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
1960 1980 2000Year
ElementarySecondary
16
Employment 1970-2000
Women were such a small share of engineers, pharmacists, physicians, and lawyers in 1970 that the Bureau of Labor Statistics didn’t report a count. They are 780,000 females in 2000.
17
Average class size has fallen. Pupil Teacher Ratio, Public Schools
Pupi
l/Tea
cher
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1955
1961
1963
1965
1967
1969
1971
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
1955 to 201218
Reading scores are steady. Natl Assmnt Educatnl Progress
Rea
ding
4th
& 2
mor
e
200
225
250
275
300
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015Year
Reading 4thReading 8thReading 12th
11/12/15
4
19
Math scores rose. Natl Assmnt Educatnl Progress
Mat
h:4t
h, 8
th, 1
2th
100
150
200
250
300
1995 2000 2005 2010 2015Year
Math 4thMath 8thMath 12th
20
Long-term Impact of Teachers
• Students of an average teacher yields $250,000 more in earnings for pupils as adults compared to a 5th percentile teacher.
Chetty et.al AmEconRvw 2014
21
Spending improves outcomes.
• To improve quality, we could spend more: pay teachers more.
• With rising demand, why aren’t we spending more?
22
#3 Have tests produced gains?
Good principals and teachers make good schools, not good tests.
23
Tests measure limited outcomes.
• Measure a limited number of skills. • Teachers teach to the test. • The same test questions year after year • Focus on tests makes school boring. • Multiple choice for art, music, PhysEd.
24
Incentive pay doesn’t work.
Peabody study found no significant difference in gains in test scores with large incentives to teachers.
11/12/15
5
25
Finland has the best schools.
• Teaching is a valued profession. • Teachers are well paid. • Teachers colleges are highly selective. • Teachers design the curriculum. • Teachers drive most testing. • There are few children from poor families.
26
The case for no-stakes tests.
• Good principals make good schools. • Good teachers make good schools. • When incentives are based on tests, we
invite teaching to the test and cheating. • To raise mean test scores, teach only to the
middle. • Test scores rise while learning drops.
27
#4 How do we educate the poor?
• Everyone learns by building on what they know.
• Experienced, capable, professional teachers design a school program that takes students where they are and moves them forward.
28
A higher percentage of children are poor.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015
Perc
enta
ge P
oor
Year
Incidence of Poverty
All ages Under 18 years
29
Kirkpatrick Elementary
East Nashville: Gross family income in Cayce Homes: $8,140 (2012) 720 units, 2,100 people Rest of neighborhood: $28,000. 30% to 48% of pupils enter and exit during the year.
30
% 4-year olds in preschool
11/12/15
6
31
Educate all children.
Providing effective education for children from poor families is challenging.
32
#5 Privatize?
Contractors Charters Vouchers Online Teach for America
There are many ways to privatize.
33
Choose a World?
World A: Households average $50,000 of income; you get $45,000. World B: Households average $30,000 of income; you get $35,000.
34
Three Problems with Private
1. Exaggerates a positional race. 2. Exaggerates the role of tests. 3. Undermines community.
35
Is contracting effective?
• A school board can write a contract with third party to operate a local school. The contractor’s profit motive gives strong incentives for good performance.
• From Fran Tarkenton in the 1970s to Chris Whittle in the 1990s, to the charter movement today, contracting has not delivered systematic gains.
36
Are charter schools effective?
• In recruiting and expelling students, charters create a positional race.
• Many charters depend on dense testing. • Charters generally increase segregation. • Do charters increase community responsibility
for the schools?
11/12/15
7
37
Charters show no general gains.
• With random assignment of students to charters or regular schools, the charters show outcomes similar to regular schools.
• Charters often attract some, repel others.
Examples of careful studies
Angrist et al.: Massachusetts charters: a. low-income children in inner city in highly
structured charters: Higher test scores b. Charters in suburban areas: Lower test
scores.
39
Vouchers?
• A voucher is a payment that the State provides to schools chosen by parents.
• Parents may be required to pay additional tuition. • In some settings, schools may choose among
applicants. • Voucher schools generally need not meet State
standards for teachers, curriculum, buildings, transport, special education, and other services.
40
Online Instruction
Florida and Idaho require it. The online operators get paid without review. Online schooling is a cash cow for investors that provides little education.
Dell, Microsoft, Apple, News Corp, and venture capitalists promote
public spending online.
41
Teach For America http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/teach-for-america Vasquez Heilig and Jez
TFA teachers perform slightly better than other uncertified teachers, but worse than certified teachers with the same experience. Inexperienced teachers are much less effective than experienced teachers. It costs $70,000 to support a new TFA. Fifty percent leave after two years, 80% after three. TFA is an expensive way to build a corps of experienced teachers.
42
Privatizing: not a clear path.
• Contracting hasn’t worked. • Incentive pay doesn’t work. • Voucher and charter plans depend on the
details of design. Gains are idiosyncratic. • Online tools are not a substitute for
teachers.
11/12/15
8
43
Do we understand the fundamentals?
• If declines in home-life and declining teacher quality are important, are charters and vouchers a plausible response?
• Any choice system will cause sorting with likely gains for some at the expense of others.
44
Progress
• More support for mothers and children. • More quality pre-schooling (OK, GA) • Expect rich, full curriculum. • Employ great principals. • Let school systems choose most tests.
45
Conclusions
1. Demand for school quality is rising. 2. Spending more on teachers will help. 3. Good management is essential. 4. Careful education of poor children pays. 5. Privatization is not a clear path. 6. Stratification discourages all but the top.
Oxter