Educator Effectiveness

System Overview Training

Using data to drive effective teaching

Group NormsActive Participants

Equal Voice

Suspend Judgment

Honor Time

Be Mindful (yourself, others, our area, and

technology)

Objectives for Today

Overview & introduction to the EES

Become familiar with what the differentiated cycles are for SY 15-16

Understand what Professional Development Plan and its purpose

Learn about timelines related to EES components

Understand how the overall rating for EES is calculated

Overview4

Teacher Classification

Classroom Observation

Core Professionalism

Hawaii Growth Model

Student Learning Objective (SLO)

Non ClassroomObservation or Working

Portfolio

Core Professionalism

Hawaii Growth Model

SLO or School Systems Improvement Objective (SSIO)

Multiple Measures

Improved Student Outcomes

Educator Effectiveness Data

Student Growth

& Learning

Teacher Practice

Hawaii Growth Model

Observation / Working Portfolio

EES Measures & WeightingClassroom Teacher Beginning/New & Non-Classroom Teachers

Studen

t Growth & Learning

Teache

r Practic

e

25%

25%

5%

45%

Teacher MGP Available:1 SLO (25%)Teacher MGP (25%)

No Teacher MGP but School-Wide ELA MGP Available:1 SLOs (45%)School-wide MGP (5%)

50%

5%

45%

1 SLO or SSIO (50%) if there’s no SGP available

School-Wide ELA MGP Available:1 SLOs (50%)School-wide MGP (5%)

20%

30%

Core Professionalism with Tripod Reflection (20%)Classroom Observations (30%)

20%

30%

Core Professionalism with Tripod Reflection (20%)Classroom Observations (30%)

Final Effectiveness RatingsHighly Effective

Demonstrates excellence in teacher practice and student/system outcomes that exceed expectations.

Effective Demonstrates excellence in teacher practice and student/system outcomes that meet expectations.

Marginal Needs improvement to demonstrate effective teacher practice and student/system outcomes.

Unsatisfactory

Does not show evidence of effective teacher practice or expected student/system outcomes

The final effectiveness rating represents the combined performance on multiple measures e.g. core professionalism, observations, SLO, Hawaii Growth Model.

Overview8

Differentiating EES for SY 15-16

Comprehensive

Evaluations

Enhanced

Standard

Streamlined

Non Tenured Teachers

Teachers rated as less than effective

Tenured teachers rated effective or Highly

effective

Alternating Years of participation

Expectations for SY 2015-2016 forENHANCED Cycle CLASSROOM Teacher

Classroom Observations Teachers will participate in two observation cycles or more. One in fall and one in spring.

Core Professionalism

Document and submit Domain 4 components of the Danielson Framework for Teaching evidence and reflect on the Tripod survey results (Gr. 3-12). Classroom teachers for grades 3-12 will participate in the Roster Verification process in the fall.

Hawaii Growth Model Classroom teachers for grades 4-8 in tested subjects will participate in the Roster Verification process in the spring and receive growth data for their students. Beginning Teachers will not receive SGP data due to the one year data lag.

Student Learning Objectives Teachers will complete one SLO using the template and record sheet.

-Individual Professional Development Plan (IPDP)-Principal Directed Professional Development Plan (PDPDP)

Evaluator and teacher plan target areas and identify goals of improvement. The PDPDP must be developed within the first 30 days of school year.

Overview10

Expectations for 2015-2016

Core Professionalism

Document and submit Domain 4 components of the Danielson Framework for Teaching evidence.

Formal Observation

NCTs may select to do a formal observation in lieu of a Working Portfolio.

Student Learning Objectives or SSIO

NCTs will complete one SLO using the template and record sheet or an School Systems Improvement Objective (SSIO) with the template.

Working Portfolio

NCTs will select components from the Danielson Framework for Teaching or Hawaii Teacher Standards Board Performance Standards (Librarian/Counselor)

-Individual Professional Development Plan (IPDP)-Principal Directed Professional Development Plan (PDPDP)

Evaluator and teacher plan target areas and identify goals of improvement. The PDPDP must be developed within the first 30 days of school year.

ENHANCED CYCLE: Non-Classroom Teachers

Overview

Evaluation Cycle Implementation Timeline

2015-16 2016-17 2017-18

Group A Streamlined Standard Streamlined

Group B Streamlined Streamlined Standard

• Non Tenured teachers and tenured teacher rated as less than effective will be on an ANNUAL ENHANCED Comprehensive evaluation

• Tenured teachers rated as effective or better will participate in an alternating schedule of Standard Comprehensive and Streamlined Comprehensive evaluation

OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES will publish a schedule related to Group A & B participants.