Upload
anastasia-howe
View
31
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
ACP – EU Cooperation Programme in Higher Education. EDULINK II 4th Call for Proposals Information Session Part B EDULINK PMU. Implemented by the ACP Secretariat. Funded by the European Union. Contents Procedures for application Procedures for evaluation Critical issues - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
EDULINK II4th Call for Proposals
Information Session
Part B
EDULINK PMU
Funded by the European Union
Implemented by the
ACP Secretariat
ACP – EU Cooperation Programme in Higher Education
Contents
Procedures for application
Procedures for evaluation
Critical issues
Further information
Procedures for application
Guidelines Application Form and Annexes can be downloaded from the DEVCO-EuropeAid Website
Funding page:
http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/work/funding/index_en.htm
Follow:
Calls for proposals
Recent Publications - Search
or
use the reference:
132023 - Search
Procedures for application
OPEN CALL PROCEDUREAs an Open Call for proposals, all documents are submitted in one stage
(Concept Note and Full Application + annexes)
Elements to the Application 1.Part A: Concept Note2.Part B: Full Application form3.Checklist (section 6 of part B: full application form)4.Declaration by the Applicant (section 7 of Part B full application form)5.Annexes: Annex B: Budget (Global Estimated Costs; Sources of Funding and Justification of Costs)Annex C: Logical Framework
Make sure that these documents contain all the relevant informationPlease do not include any other documents as only these will be evaluated!
Procedures for application
Deadline for Applications
30 July 2012
Procedures for application
Applications must be submitted inOne original plus two CopiesA4 sizeBoundPlus CD-ROM of complete application (Concept note; Full Application; Annexes)
Applications must be delivered by:Registered mailPrivate Courier ServiceHand DeliveryProposals must be written (typed) in either English or French
No hand written applications will be accepted !!
Procedures for application
Applications must be delivered
in a SEALED envelope
Include on the Envelope:
Reference number of the Call for Proposals (EuropeAid/132023/D/ACT/ACPTPS)
The title and number of the LOT applied for:LOT 1 EDF or:LOT 2 DCI (Relations with South Africa)
Full name and address of Applicant “Not to be opened before the opening session”
Procedures for application
Address:
EDULINK
Programme Management Unit
c/o GOPA-Cartermill
Rue de Trèves, 45
B1040
Brussels
Belgium
Procedures for evaluation
EVALUATION Independent Evaluators Each proposal evaluated by at least 2 different evaluators
THREE STEPS 1. Opening Administrative and Concept NotesDeadline respectedCheck list points satisfied (section 6 of Part B of full application form)
Concept notes with a minimum score of 30 will pass to the next stage(Evaluation Grid: page 17, section 2,3 Guidelines)
2. Evaluation of Full Application Check list points satisfied (section 6 of Part B of full application form)(Evaluation Grid: page 19, section 2,3 Guidelines)
3. Eligibility Check
Procedures for evaluation
STEP TWO
Evaluation of Full Application
Two Evaluation criteria:
Selection criteria (Section 1: evaluation grid)Financial and Operational Capacity A score of less than 12 out of a maximum of 20 will lead to automatic rejection
Award criteria (sections 2,3,4 and 5 of Evaluation Grid)Compliance with EDULINK II Objectives and prioritiesRelevanceExpected ImpactSustainability Cost effectiveness
Procedures for evaluation
STEP Three
Verification of Eligibility
Only performed for provisionally selected proposalsList according to score and financial envelopeDeclaration of the applicant cross checked with supporting documentation
Eligibility Criteria (Sections 2,1 of guidelines)2,1,1: Eligibility of applicants2,1,2: Eligibility of partners2,1,3: Eligibility of actions
Procedures for evaluation
STEP Three Supporting Documentation
Statutes or Articles of Association (law establishing body)Latest accounts (not required for public entities)Legal entity sheet (Annex D) Financial identification form (Annex E) Bank must be one that is located in the country where the applicant is registered
Name address and contact details of audit firmDocument from competent national authorities certifying applicant and partners are accredited HEIsEnglish or French Translations of Documents in other languages
Critical issuesMAJOR REASONS FOR THE REJECTION OF APPLICATIONS UNDER
PREVIOUS CALLS FOR PROPOSALS: ADMINISTRATIVE CHECK
The application was posted after the deadline This is the most annoying reason of all for having your proposal rejected after all the effort it took to prepare it, so be absolutely sure to respect the deadline. Rejection of late proposals is automatic and there will be no exceptions!
The application failed to pass the administrative checkThe compulsory format of the Application Form was not respectedEssential documents were missing (budget, budget justification, logical framework, concept note, etc.) Partnership not eligible (no partners at all, not enough partners, ineligible applicant or partner) Requested EDF contribution exceeds the limit.Application not in EN or FR
Critical issuesMAJOR REASONS FOR THE REJECTION OF APPLICATIONS UNDER
PREVIOUS CALLS FOR PROPOSALS
Quality of the content
The relevance of the project (to needs and constraints of the country/region and to those of the target groups and final beneficiaries) is not convincing;
Proposal shows no clear relation to the objectives of EDULINK;
Goals too ambitious and not substantiated by the proposed activities;
Objectives, methodology and results are insufficiently elaborated and explained;
Text is not clearly structured, lacking internal logic;
Text is obviously written by “cut and paste”; poor final editing;
Poor Logical Framework (internal logic, indicators, sources of verification)
Costs appear exaggerated in relation to proposed activities and inputs.
Critical issuesMAJOR REASONS FOR THE REJECTION OF APPLICATIONS UNDER
PREVIOUS CALLS FOR PROPOSALS
ImpactTarget group(s) not clearly identified or negligible in quantitative terms;Proposal does not elaborate on tangible outputs and results;Sustainability of the project not sufficiently substantiated.
ImplementationInsufficient management experience; Inadequate knowledge of Project Cycle Management.
Further information
Clarifications may be asked to the EDULINK PMU at:
Frequently asked questions will be published regularly on the EDULINK website
Deadline for Questions is 21 days before the deadline for applications
Deadline for answers is 11 days before the deadline for applications
Further information
EDULINK PMU (frequently asked questions)
ACP Secretariat
http://www.acp.int/
EDULINK Website
http://www.acp-edulink.eu/
Further information
The «Manual for Preparing an EDULINK Application» is being updated to take into account the changes in the 4th Call.
It will be available soon on the EDULINK website.