37
EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review November 6, 2017 EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 1 / 33

EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

EE359 Discussion Session 6Midterm Review

November 6, 2017

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 1 / 33

Page 2: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Broad topics covered so far

Channel modelsI Path lossI ShadowingI Fading

Performance analysisI CapacityI Probability of outageI Probability of bit/symbol error

Combating fading (diversity)

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 2 / 33

Page 3: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Outline

1 ReviewChannel modelsPerformance analysisCombating fading

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 3 / 33

Page 4: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Path loss models

Models attenuation caused by “spread” of EM waves

Free space

2-ray and n-ray models

Simplified path loss models

Pr = PtK

(d0

d

)γValid in the far field, i.e. when d is large, γ is path loss exponent, K candepend on carrier frequency

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 4 / 33

Page 5: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Shadowing

Models attenuation caused by EM waves passing through randomlylocated buildings/obstacles

Log normal shadowing assumes

10 log10(Pr) = 10 log10(P̄r) + S,

where S ∼ N (0, σ2ψdB

) or equivalently

Pr(dB) = P̄r(dB) + S

S is associated with location, closely located points will havecorrelated S (can talk of decorrelation distance Xc)

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 5 / 33

Page 6: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Outage probability

Idea

Outage ≡ Received power γ is below threshold γ0

Reasons

Path loss (usually no randomness)

Shadowing (randomness if shadowing time scales are small)

Fading (randomness due to multipath combining)

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 6 / 33

Page 7: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Outage probability and cell coverage area

Outage probability

Defined for a particular location

Relates Pout, Pmin (dB), P̄r(d) (dB), σψdB at a location d via

Pout = Q

(P̄r(d)− Pmin

σψdB

)under log normal shadowing

Cell coverage area

Expected fraction of location within cell where received power isabove Pmin (dB) (averaged over both space and shadowing),

C = Q(a) + e2−2ab

b2 Q

(2− abb

)under simplified path loss and log normal shadowing, where

a = Pmin−P̄r(R)σψdB

,b = 10γ log10(e)σψdB

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33

Page 8: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Fading

Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases dueto multipath

Recall: Narrowband versus wideband

Received signal Re{∑N

n=1 an(t)e−jφn(t)u[τ − τn(t)]ej2πfct}Narrowband approximation u(t) ≈ u(t− τn(t)), i.e. received signal is

r(t) = Re{α(t)u(t)ej2πfct}

Time

Figure: Narrowband Tm � 1Bu

Time

Figure: Wideband Tm ≈,≥ 1Bu

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 8 / 33

Page 9: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Fading contd.

Narrowband fading

Effect of channel is just scalar multiplication by complex constant

α(t) = rI(t) + jrQ(t)

Specify distribution on envelope z(t) = |α(t)| =√rI(t)2 + rQ(t)2:

Rayleigh, Rician, Nakagami m, . . .

Wideband fading

Effect of channel no longer modeled by a single scalar multiplication

Characterized by multipath intensity profile, doppler power spectrum

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 9 / 33

Page 10: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

On fading “types”

Depends on:

Signal Bandwidth Bu

Coherence Time Tc or Doppler Effects

Coherence Bandwidth Bc or Delay Spread

Tc high, slow fadingTc low, fast fading

Bc low, freq. sel. fading

Bc high, flat fading

Tc

Bc

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 10 / 33

Page 11: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Example Problems

Consider a 150m circular cell that follows a simplified pathloss model withK = 0.01, d = 1m, and pathloss exponent γ = 3. The transmitted poweris 14W. What percentage of locations have a received power greater than6.21× 10−8W?

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 11 / 33

Page 12: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Example Problems

Repeat the previous problem with σφdB = 4dB log-normal shadowingpresent.

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 12 / 33

Page 13: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Example Problems

What is Pout for a user that is 100m away from the center of the cell? UsePr < 6.21× 10−8W as the outage criteria

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 13 / 33

Page 14: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Outline

1 ReviewChannel modelsPerformance analysisCombating fading

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 14 / 33

Page 15: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Capacity

Definition

Maximum data rate that can be supported by the channel with vanishingprobability of error

Capacity C under different models (γ is the instantaneous SNR at thereceiver, B is bandwidth)

Scheme Capacity ExpressionAWGN C = B log2(1 + γ)

Shannon capacity in fadingwith Rx CSI only

C =∫∞

0 B log2(1 + γ)p(γ)dγ

Shannon capacity with Tx, RxCSI (Waterfilling)

C =∫∞γ0B log2(γ/γ0)p(γ)dγ, where∫∞

γ0(1/γ0 − 1/γ)p(γ)dγ = 1

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 15 / 33

Page 16: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Capacity formulas continued ...

Capacity expressions C

Scheme Capacity Expression

Channel Inversion C = B log2

(1 + 1

E[1/γ]

)Truncated Channel Inversion C = B log2

(1 + 1

Eγ0 [1/γ]

)p(γ > γ0)

where Eγ0 [1/γ] =∫∞γ0

1γ p(γ)dγ

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 16 / 33

Page 17: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Example Problem

Discrete time-varying AWGN channel with 3 states: γ1 = 3dB, γ2 = 8dB,γ3 = 15dB, with p1 = 0.3, p2 = 0.5, p3 = 0.2. Assume average transmitpower P̄ and perfect CSI and TX and RX. Find optimal transmissionstrategy and capacity per unit bandwidth

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 17 / 33

Page 18: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Example Problem

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 18 / 33

Page 19: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Example Problem

What is the capacity of the previous example if TX power is fixed?

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 19 / 33

Page 20: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Average probability of bit/symbol error

Idea

Compute P̄s = Eγ [Ps(γ)]

May be simplified using alternate Q functions and MGFs of fadingdistributions

Regime of relevance

Metric Relevant regimeOutage probability Ts � TcAverage probability of error Ts ≈ TcAWGN probability of error Ts � Tc

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 20 / 33

Page 21: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Combined outage and average error probability

Setting

Shadowing time scales are small (e.g. moving receiver)

Idea

Three SNRs:

γs: Instantaneous (random)

γ̄s: Averaged over multipath fading (random)

¯̄γs: Averaged over multipath fading and shadowing (influenced by e.g.path loss)

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 21 / 33

Page 22: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Fading and fading/shadowing: Which formula to use ?

Question 1

Outage can be due to fading or shadowing, so which one to use?

Answer

In fading, use fading outage formula, relating Pout, γ0 or Ps(γ), γ̄

In combined fading and shadowing, outage is due to shadowing, so use

Pout = Q

(P̄r(d)− Pmin

σψdB

)under log normal shadowing

Fading outage formula

Pout = 1− e−γ0γ̄ in Rayleigh fading

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 22 / 33

Page 23: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Fading and fading/shadowing: Which formula to use ?

Question 1

Outage can be due to fading or shadowing, so which one to use?

Answer

In fading, use fading outage formula, relating Pout, γ0 or Ps(γ), γ̄

In combined fading and shadowing, outage is due to shadowing, so use

Pout = Q

(P̄r(d)− Pmin

σψdB

)under log normal shadowing

Fading outage formula

Pout = 1− e−γ0γ̄ in Rayleigh fading

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 22 / 33

Page 24: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Fading and fading/shadowing: Which formula to use ?

Question 1

Outage can be due to fading or shadowing, so which one to use?

Answer

In fading, use fading outage formula, relating Pout, γ0 or Ps(γ), γ̄

In combined fading and shadowing, outage is due to shadowing, so use

Pout = Q

(P̄r(d)− Pmin

σψdB

)under log normal shadowing

Fading outage formula

Pout = 1− e−γ0γ̄ in Rayleigh fading

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 22 / 33

Page 25: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Fading and fading/shadowing: Which formula to use ?

Question 2

Given Ps or P̄s, what formula do we use to get target γ0?

Answer

In fading, you would want to use AWGN formulae relating γ to Ps

In combined fading and shadowing, you would want to use γ̄ versus P̄s

AWGN Ps formulae

Ps = Q(√

2γ)

for BPSK, Ps =1

2e−γ for DPSK

Average P̄s formulae

P̄s ≈1

4γ̄for BPSK, P̄s ≈

1

2γ̄for DPSK

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 23 / 33

Page 26: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Fading and fading/shadowing: Which formula to use ?

Question 2

Given Ps or P̄s, what formula do we use to get target γ0?

Answer

In fading, you would want to use AWGN formulae relating γ to Ps

In combined fading and shadowing, you would want to use γ̄ versus P̄s

AWGN Ps formulae

Ps = Q(√

2γ)

for BPSK, Ps =1

2e−γ for DPSK

Average P̄s formulae

P̄s ≈1

4γ̄for BPSK, P̄s ≈

1

2γ̄for DPSK

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 23 / 33

Page 27: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Error floors

What is an error floor?

Error floor whenever Ps 9 0 as γ →∞

Summary of effects

Data rate cannot be too low with differential modulation schemesI Differential schemes assume channel is constant across subsequent

symbolsI Depends on Doppler or Tc

Data rate cannot be too high in any systemI Channel will “spread” symbols across time, causing self interference

(ISI - inter symbol interference)I Depends on Bc or bandwidth of channel

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 24 / 33

Page 28: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Example Problems

What SNR is required to acheive a BER of 10−3 given BPSK in AWGN?For DPSK in AWGN?

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 25 / 33

Page 29: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Example Problems

What SNR is required to acheive a BER of 10−3 given BPSK in RayleighFading? For DPSK in Rayleigh Fading?

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 26 / 33

Page 30: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Outline

1 ReviewChannel modelsPerformance analysisCombating fading

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 27 / 33

Page 31: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Diversity

Idea

Use of independent fading realizations can reduce the probability oferror/outage events

Some diversity combining schemes (with M i.i.d. realizations) withCSI

Selection Combining: γΣ = maxi γi, Pout,M = (Pout)M

Maximal Ratio Combining: γΣ =∑

i γi, P̄s,M ≈(P̄s,1

)M, can use

MGF expressions for P̄s,M

Benefits

Diversity gain (or diversity order)

SNR gain (or array gain)

Depending on available CSI, can employ these schemes at both receiverand transmitter

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 28 / 33

Page 32: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Diversity

Idea

Use of independent fading realizations can reduce the probability oferror/outage events

Some diversity combining schemes (with M i.i.d. realizations) withCSI

Selection Combining: γΣ = maxi γi, Pout,M = (Pout)M

Maximal Ratio Combining: γΣ =∑

i γi, P̄s,M ≈(P̄s,1

)M, can use

MGF expressions for P̄s,M

Benefits

Diversity gain (or diversity order)

SNR gain (or array gain)

Depending on available CSI, can employ these schemes at both receiverand transmitter

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 28 / 33

Page 33: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Transmit diversity

Setup

Multiple antennas at the transmitter, single antenna at receiver

Observation

Can use the same SC and MRC techniques at the transmitter

Benefits

Simpler receiver processing with same diversity benefits

Needs CSIT (which has more overhead than CSIR, why?)

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 29 / 33

Page 34: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Example Problems

Consider a two branch MRC setup. The SNR on the first branch isuniformly distributed between 5 and 10 (linear units), and the SNR on thesecond branch is uniformly distributed between 5 and 20 units. What isthe outage probability for a target BER of 10−6?

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 30 / 33

Page 35: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Example Problems

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 31 / 33

Page 36: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Example Problems

Repeat the above problem for an SC diversity setup

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 32 / 33

Page 37: EE359 Discussion Session 6 Midterm Review · EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 7 / 33. Fading Models attenuation due to EM waves combining with random phases due to multipath Recall:

Example Problems

EE359 Discussion 6 November 6, 2017 33 / 33