EEOC FORM 715-01 PART A - D · • Increasing recruitment capacity by instituting a Department of the Interior Student Ambassador Program that utilizes DOI interns as recruitment

1

EEOC FORM 715-01 PART A - D

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

FEDERAL AGENCY ANNUAL EEO PROGRAM STATUS REPORT

For period covering October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2015

PART A

Department or Agency Identifying Information

1. Agency 1. U.S. Department of the Interior

1.a. 2nd level reporting component

1.b. 3rd level reporting component

1.c. 4th level reporting component

2. Address 2. 1849 C Street, NW

3. City, State, Zip Code 3. Washington, DC 20240

4. CPDF Code 5. FIPS code(s) 4. IN 5.

PART B

Total Employment

1. Enter total number of permanent full-time and part-time employees

1. 53,732

2. Enter total number of temporary employees 2. 16,435

3. Enter total number employees paid from non-appropriated funds

3. 0

4. TOTAL EMPLOYMENT [add lines B 1 through 3] 4. 70,167

PART C

Agency Official(s)

Responsible For Oversight

of EEO Program(s)

1. Head of Agency Official Title

1. Sally Jewell Secretary

2. Agency Head Designee 2. Kristen J. Sarri, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary - Policy, Management & Budget

3. Principal EEO Director/Official Official Title/series/grade

3. John W. Burden Director, ES 301,Office of Civil Rights

4. Title VII Affirmative EEO Program Official

4. Vacant

5. Complaints Processing Program Official

5. Tanisha Edmonds Chief, Employment Complaints & Adjudication Div

6. Other Responsible EEO Staff 6. Sloan Farrell Chief, Public Civil Rights

7. Other Responsible EEO Staff 7. Kimberly Ly Social Science Research Analysis

2

EEOC FORM 715-01 PART A - D

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission FEDERAL AGENCY ANNUAL EEO PROGRAM STATUS REPORT

PART D

List of Subordinate Components Covered in This Report

Subordinate Component and Location (City/State) CPDF and FIPS codes

Office of the Secretary IN-01

Bureau of Indian Affairs/Indian Education IN-06

Bureau of Land Management IN-05

Bureau of Reclamation IN-07

Fish and Wildlife Service IN-15

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management IN-27

National Park Service IN-10

Office of Surface Mining IN-22

U.S. Geological Survey IN-08

Bureau of Safety & Environmental Enforcement IN-26

EEOC FORMS and Documents Included With This Report

*Executive Summary [FORM 715-01 PART E], that includes:

X *Optional Annual Self-Assessment Checklist Against Essential Elements [FORM 715-01PART G]

Brief paragraph describing the agency's mission and mission-related functions

X *EEO Plan To Attain the Essential Elements of a Model EEO Program [FORM 715-01PART H] for each programmatic essential element requiring improvement

X

Summary of results of agency's annual self-assessment against MD-715 "Essential Elements"

X *EEO Plan To Eliminate Identified Barrier [FORM 715-01 PART I] for each identified barrier

X

Summary of Analysis of Work Force Profiles including net change analysis and comparison to RCLF

X *Special Program Plan for the Recruitment, Hiring, and Advancement of Individuals With Targeted Disabilities for agencies with 1,000 or more employees [FORM 715-01 PART J]

X

Summary of EEO Plan objectives planned to eliminate identified barriers or correct program deficiencies

X *Copy of Workforce Data Tables as necessary to support Executive Summary and/or EEO Plans

X

Summary of EEO Plan action items implemented or accomplished

X *Copy of data from 462 Report as necessary to support action items related to Complaint Processing Program deficiencies, ADR effectiveness, or other compliance issues.

X

*Statement of Establishment of Continuing Equal Employment Opportunity Programs [FORM 715-01 PART F]

X *Copy of Facility Accessibility Survey results as necessary to support EEO Action Plan for building renovation projects

*Copies of relevant EEO Policy Statement(s) *Organizational Chart

1

PART E: Executive Summary 1. Introduction The mission of the U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI or Department) is to protect and manage the Nation’s natural resources and cultural heritage; provide scientific and other information about those resources; and honor its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. DOI currently employs more than 70,000 employees dispersed amongst its nine (9) bureaus with an array of occupations ranging from Acquisitions, Emergency Response, Geophysicists, to Park Rangers. The following Management Directive 715 (MD-715) Report and Plan demonstrates support for building and sustaining a Model EEO Program and provides details on the EEO and diversity and inclusion approach undertaken by DOI. The foundation of this approach is the continuous collaborative development of diversity and inclusion strategies throughout the year, rather than merely placing emphasis on a year-end report or special emphasis activities. We recognize that collaboration is essential for the leadership, stakeholders, and partners who are working towards enhancing representational diversity, building a culture and climate of inclusion, and developing and sustaining a model EEO program. In FY2015, the DOI MD-715 Report and Plan demonstrated continued progress in addressing deficiencies identified during the self-assessment. Specifically, DOI has made measurable strides in achieving the six essential elements of a model EEO Program.

2. Trends in EEO and Diversity and Inclusion Data Current data indicators and trends on the federal workforce provided in the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) report titled American Experiences versus American Expectations (retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/reports/american_experiences/) noted that Women, Hispanics, Asians, and Blacks lag behind Whites in the federal workforce in managerial and official positions compared to census data benchmarks. Additionally, the U.S. EEOC complaints data demonstrate a continued presence of stigma and discrimination trends in the workplace based on sex, disability status, and identification as sexual and gender minorities (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and gender non-conforming individuals). A snapshot of DOI workforce demographics, complaints trends, and Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS) data shows workforce patterns similar to the EEOC’s trends for the overall federal government.

A. DOI Workforce Summary Data This section contains a summary of the workforce analyses conducted as part of the MD-715 Report and Plan. Detailed breakouts can be found within the appendices. In order to adequately examine the workforce, DOI uses data from the Census Bureau as comparators where appropriate. The overall civilian labor force (CLF) benchmarks referenced in this report consist of U.S. citizens, age 16 or older, who are employed or seeking employment and are not in the military or institutionalized. The relevant civilian labor force (RCLF) is an occupation specific subset of the CLF. Comparisons between DOI data and the RCLF allow DOI to more definitively identify potential barriers to EEO and provide key decision makers with relevant and useful information about the state of the Department.

DOI’s total workforce included 70,167 employees as of September 30, 2015; 53,732 were permanent employees and 16,435 were temporary employees. The FY2015 participation rates of populations

http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/reports/american_experiences/

2

based on race, ethnicity, sex, and disability showed that DOI’s largest race/ethnicity group was White at 73.4%, followed by American Indian/Alaska Native at 13.0%, Hispanic/Latino at 5.6%, Black/African American at 4.9%, Asian at 2.3%, and Native Hawaiian /Other Pacific Islander at 0.6%. The participation rates based on sex were 59.9% male and 40.1% female. Of the total workforce, 86.3% self-identified as having no disability, 8.1% reported having a disability, 5.6% failed to self-identify, and 1.0% reported having a targeted disability. DOI also compares its workforce data to the CLF and RCLF to determine which, if any, groups have a lower than expected participation rate within DOI. DOI’s FY2015 workforce representation data shows lower than expected participation rates among Hispanic males and females, White females, African American/Black males and females, Asian males and females, and males and females of two or more races. DOI’s FY2015 workforce representation data shows a higher than expected participation rate among White males, American Indian/Alaska Native males and females, and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander males and females. B. DOI EEO Complaint Trends (Data for the top five bases and top five issues) In FY2015, most of the formal filed EEO complaints were based on claims of reprisal, disability, sex, race, and national origin. Common issues raised in the formal filed EEO complaints were harassment (non-sexual), promotion/non-selection, assignment of duties, evaluation/appraisal, and terms and conditions of employment. The OCR will continue to collaborate with leadership and Bureaus EEO Officials to address these trends through training and other measures.

FY2013 Top Five Bases Total Top Five Issues Total Reprisal 154 Harassment (Non-sexual) 120 Age 104 Disciplinary Action 61 Sex 104 Evaluation/Appraisal 46 Disability 93 Assignment of Duties 45 Race (Black) 63 Terms and Conditions of

Employment 43

FY2014 Top Five Bases Total Top Five Issues Total Reprisal 154 Harassment (Non Sexual) 120 Disability 121 Disciplinary Action 55 Sex 106 Promotion/Non-Selection 49 Age 105 Terms and Conditions of

Employment 38

Race (Black) 47 Evaluation and Appraisal 35 FY2015 Top Five Bases Total Top Five Issues Total Reprisal 159 Harassment (Non Sexual) 149 Disability 141 Promotion/Non-Selection 55 Sex 119 Assignment of Duties 47 Race (Black) 49 Evaluation/Appraisal 41

3

Top Five Bases Total Top Five Issues Total National Origin 43 Terms and Conditions of

Employment 41

Source: DOI Annual 462 Complaint Report

3. Building a 21st Century Department of the Interior As stated in the DOI Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2014 – 2018, our vision for a 21st Century DOI includes a highly skilled and engaged workforce that reflects the diversity of the Nation and ensures that the Department achieves its mission area goals. Success will be assessed through the Best Places to Work rating that is based on the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey. This measure is strategic, comprehensive, and a nationally recognized measure of the quality and satisfaction of the workforce. DOI’s Inclusive Workplace Strategy is aimed at establishing an agency that ensures no one is shut out or left behind. Our goal is to make the Department the best place to work in America, where all of our employees are respected, quality of work life is valued, and everyone achieves their potential. In pursuit of this goal, five primary strategies were employed in FY2015 to target:

• Transforming workforce diversity training and education from anti-discrimination compliance policy to a talent optimization and organization development platform;

• Increasing recruitment capacity by instituting a Department of the Interior Student Ambassador Program that utilizes DOI interns as recruitment and outreach emissaries on college campuses to increase familiarity with the Department’s mission, programs, and employment and career opportunities;

• Instituting effective internal and external communication strategies to publicize the Department of the Interior’s commitment to establishing and sustaining an inclusive workplace;

• Focusing on culture change and positioning EEO and diversity and inclusion as mission critical imperatives; and

• Placing accountability squarely on the shoulders of leadership through requirements to institute recruiting, hiring, and promotion procedures that are based on merit and do not deliberately or inadvertently exclude anyone from competing for positions.

4. DOI’s FY2015 efforts to implement the six essential elements, as described by MD-715, necessary to create and maintain Model EEO and Diversity and Inclusion Programs resulted in the following noteworthy achievements:

Element One – Demonstrated Commitment As the following examples will attest, DOI leadership continues to demonstrate a commitment to the EEO Program in words and deeds.

• Secretary Jewell, assistant secretaries, deputy assistant secretaries, bureau directors, and senior executives routinely attend and participate in Special Emphasis Program events. Their engagement in these events has increased attendance at the events exponentially;

4

• Bureau, regional, state, and office directors invested $416K to provide FranklinCovey’s Championing Diversity workshop to their managers, supervisors, and non-supervisory employees;

• Bureau, regional, state, and office directors invested $318K to train 212 new Diversity Change Agents;

• Managers and supervisors allocated $165K to launch the fourth year of the highly successful DOI Student Ambassador Program. The Ambassadors have reached over 17,000 students, increased student knowledge of DOI’s opportunities from 27% to 92%, increased student interest in the Department’s opportunities from 43% to 83%, and increased student likelihood to apply for opportunities at the Department from 40% to 85%;

• DOI approved a $225K unfunded requirement and awarded a contract to create a live-action interactive video simulation, which will be used to deliver EEO, No FEAR Act, and diversity and inclusion training;

• DOI approved all of the required resources to conduct a full-scale barrier analysis • DOI established and hired the first-ever Social Science Research Analyst (GS-0101) within the

Office of Civil Rights. The incumbent applies statistical/quantitative techniques to develop statistical evidence of EEO and diversity and inclusion challenges, opportunities, and performance outcomes;

• DOI established two additional positions in the Office of Civil Rights and hired two Presidential Management Fellows who are high-performing law school graduates .

Element Two – Making EEO an Integral Part of the Agency’s Strategic Mission

• The DOI Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2014 – 2018 clearly communicates the urgent need to build a 21st Century Department of the Interior. Goal #1 is to build a 21st Century Workforce. The plan states, in part, “DOI’s vision for a 21st Century includes a highly skilled and engaged workforce that reflects the diversity of the Nation and ensures that the Department achieves its mission area goals.”

• Effective October 20, 2014, Secretary Jewell appointed the DOI Chief Diversity Officer/Director, Office of Civil Rights to the Executive Resources Board (ERB). The ERB has a prominent role in determining the executive resources needs of the Department’s bureaus and offices. While overseeing the management of executive resources to include Senior Executive Service, Senior Level, and Scientific and Professional positions, the ERB retains final approval for all aspects of these programs including position establishment, recruitment, qualification requirements, selection, pay setting, performance appraisals and awards, executive development, Presidential Rank Awards, and all other recognition. The ERB is generally chaired by a key senior official (such as the Deputy Secretary or Chief of Staff to the Secretary).

• The Chief Diversity/Director, Office of Civil Rights not only capitalizes on alliances that he has built across bureaus and offices to effectively deal with organizational hurdles that often inhibit collaboration, but also promotes collaboration throughout DOI regions regardless of bureau/office affiliation and increases knowledge of the value of the EEO Program;

• The Chief Diversity Officer/Director, Office of Civil Rights and his senior staff are frequently requested to lead EEO and diversity and inclusion strategic planning discussions with bureau executive leadership teams and regional managers and supervisors;

5

• The Chief Diversity Officer/Director, Office of Civil Rights has a regular and effective means of informing Secretary Jewell and other top management officials of the effectiveness, efficiency, and legal compliance of DOI’s EEO program.

Element Three – Ensuring Management and Program Accountability

• DOI established a highly sought-after EEO Mobile Training Team in FY2015. The Team successfully guides managers and supervisors to understand that their career acceleration may hinge on how well they implement EEO and diversity and inclusion principles. Through these highly effective training and strategic planning sessions, the Office of Civil Rights has expanded networks and built alliances to foster productive relationships and acquired a more in-depth understanding of the various EEO and diversity and inclusion concerns confronting our leaders;

• All DOI Senior Executives have the following performance element: Diversity Advocacy and EEO: Promotes an inclusive workplace, recognizing differences and varied perspectives; is a role model for inclusion, acceptance, and accountability; provides fair and equitable recognition and equal opportunity, and promptly and appropriately addresses allegations of harassment or discrimination. Demonstrates a commitment to equal employment opportunity and implements the EEO and affirmative employment goals. Makes employment decisions without regard to sex, race, color, national origin, religion, age, disability, sexual orientation or identification, prior participation in the EEO process, or any other non-merit reason. Ensures subordinate supervisors have effective managerial, communication, and interpersonal skills to supervise and promote a diverse workforce. Actively supports policies on anti-harassment and reasonable accommodation;

• Most DOI Senior Executives have assigned the aforementioned performance element to all of their managers and supervisors.

Element Four – Proactive Prevention of Unlawful Discrimination

• DOI awarded a $225K contract to develop a course that is structured as a live-action interactive video simulation wherein the user is the leading character in nine distinct vignettes. Often, the only way people learn proactive, positive responses to real-life challenges is through real-life experiences. By using a live-action interactive video simulation approach, DOI aims to provide all of its managers, supervisors, and non-supervisory employees with an opportunity to practice decision making in different simulated situations and learn how to address antidiscrimination and whistleblowing issues by: recognizing and managing their rights and responsibilities regarding anti-discrimination, whistleblowing, and diversity and inclusion; exploring positive and effective ways to respond to real-life stresses, conduct, and performance situations; enhancing interpersonal communication skills and strategies; and increasing an understanding of the importance of building a 21st Century DOI that reflects the diversity of America;

• DOI launched the first phase of its first-ever full-scale barrier analysis project, which involved EEOC facilitators conducting a train-the-trainer session for 35 team members. The team members in turn provided a 2-day training course and tools to project leads and bureau and Office of the Secretary project teams across DOI. More than 100 employees, including managers and supervisors, were trained in FY2015.

Element Five – Efficiency

6

• DOI fully implemented the iComplaints EEO case management software and, as a result, DOI

has the capability to effectively manage the EEO process, manage EEO complaints, and accurately generate the Form 462 annual report. For the first time since purchasing the iComplaints software in FY2006, DOI has accurate and current EEO data and information;

• DOI attained the following noteworthy achievements in FY2015: the Departmental EEO timely issued Final Agency Decisions (FADs) rate was improved from 2.5 percent in FY2014 to 70 percent in FY2015 (66 timely issued FADs surpassed the combined total of timely issued FADs for the previous 15 years); the Office of the Secretary timely issued FAD rate was increased from zero percent to 90 percent; the percentage of timely Office of the Secretary EEO investigations was increased from 54 percent to 90 percent; and the Department submitted to the EEOC a timely and accurate annual EEO statistics Report 462 for the first time in more than 25 years;

• DOI established a dedicated Compliance Unit in the Office of Civil Rights that reports directly to the Chief Diversity Officer/Director. DOI now consistently ensures timely and complete compliance with orders from the EEOC and other adjudicatory bodies, as well as implementation of the provisions of settlement agreements.

Element Six – Responsiveness and Legal Compliance

• Since establishing the Compliance Unit in the Office of Civil Rights, DOI has responded to EEOC directives and orders, including final orders contained in administrative decisions, in accordance with instructions, time frames, and deadlines; and

• Since establishing the Compliance Unit in the Office of Civil Rights, DOI has similarly complied with orders and directives of other adjudicatory bodies with concurrent jurisdiction over the EEO laws.

FISCAL YEAR 2015

EEOC FORM

715-01 PART F


CERTIFICATION of ESTABLISHMENT of CONTINUING

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY PROGRAMS

I, John W. Burden, am the Principal EEO Director for the U.S. Department of the Interior.

The agency has conducted an annual self-assessment of Section 717 and Section 501 programs against the essential elements as prescribed by EEOC MD-715. If an essential element was not fully compliant with the standards of EEOC MD-715, a further evaluation was conducted and, as appropriate, EEO Plans for Attaining the Essential Elements of a Model EEO Program, are included with this Federal Agency Annual EEO Program Status Report.

The agency has also analyzed its work force profiles and conducted barrier analyses aimed at detecting whether any management or personnel policy, procedure or practice is operating to disadvantage any group based on race, national origin, gender or disability. EEO Plans to Eliminate Identified Barriers, as appropriate, are included with this Federal Agency Annual EEO Program Status Report.

I certify that proper documentation of this assessment is in place and is being maintained for EEOC review upon request.

John W. Burden, Director, Office of Civil Rights Signature of Principal EEO Director/Official Certifies that this Federal Agency Annual EEO Program Status Report is in compliance with EEOC MD-715.

Mary Pletcher, Deputy J\ssistant Signature of Agency Head Designee

October 14, 2016

Date

1

EEOC FORM 715-01 PART G U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission FEDERAL AGENCY ANNUAL EEO PROGRAM STATUS REPORT

United States Department of Interior

SELF-ASSESSMENT CHECKLIST MEASURING ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS

Reporting Period October 1, 2014 – September 30, 2015

Essential Element A: DEMONSTRATED COMMITMENT FROM AGENCY LEADERSHIP Requires the agency head to issue written policy statements ensuring a workplace free of discriminatory harassment and a commitment to equal employment opportunity.

Compliance Indicator

EEO policy statements are up-to-date.

Measure has been

met

For all unmet measures, provide a brief

explanation in the space below or complete and

attach an EEOC FORM 715-01 PART H to the agency's

status report

Measures Yes No

1. The Agency Head was installed on April 12, 2013. The most recent EEO policy statement was signed on July 26, 2011. 2. Was the EEO policy Statement issued within 6 - 9 months of the installation of the Agency Head? If no, provide an explanation.

x A new EEO policy statement and an Anti-harassment policy are currently under review. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (No), U.S Geological Survey (No), Office of the Secretary (OS) (No) (OS does not issue a separate policy, it follows the Departmental policy).

2

Bureau of Indian Affairs (Yes), Bureau of Land Management (Yes), Bureau of Reclamation (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes), National Park Service (Yes), Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (Yes)

3. During the current Agency Head's tenure, has the EEO policy Statement been re-issued annually? If no, provide an explanation. x See comment above.

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (No), U.S. Geological Survey (No) Bureau of Indian Affairs (Yes), Bureau of Land Management (Yes), Office of the Secretary (Yes) Bureau of Reclamation (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes), National Park Service (Yes), Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement (Yes)

4. Are new employees provided a copy of the EEO policy statement during orientation? x U.S. Geological Survey (No) Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (Yes), Office of the Secretary (Yes), Bureau of Indian Affairs (Yes), Bureau of Land Management (Yes) Bureau of Reclamation (Yes),

3

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes), National Park Service (Yes) and the Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement (Yes)

5. When an employee is promoted into the supervisory ranks, is s/he provided a copy of the EEO policy statement?

x


EEO policy statements have been communicated to all employees.

Measure has been

met




status report

Measures Yes No

6. Have the heads of subordinate reporting components communicated support of all agency EEO policies through the ranks?

x

7. Has the agency made written materials available to all employees and applicants, informing them of the variety of EEO programs and administrative and judicial remedial procedures available to them?

x

8. Has the agency prominently posted such written materials in all personnel offices, EEO offices, and on the agency's internal website? [see 29 CFR §1614.102(b)(5)]

x


Agency EEO policy is vigorously enforced by agency management.

Measure has been

met




status report

Measures Yes No

9. Are managers and supervisors evaluated on their commitment to agency EEO policies and principles, including their efforts to:

x

a. resolve problems/disagreements and other conflicts in their respective work environments as they arise?

x

4

b. address concerns, whether perceived or real, raised by employees and following-up with appropriate action to correct or eliminate tension in the workplace?

x

c. support the agency's EEO program through allocation of mission personnel to participate in community out-reach and recruitment programs with private employers, public schools and universities?

x

d. ensure full cooperation of employees under his/her supervision with EEO office officials such as EEO Counselors, EEO Investigators, etc.?

x

e. ensure a workplace that is free from all forms of discrimination, harassment and retaliation? x

f. ensure that subordinate supervisors have effective managerial, communication and interpersonal skills in order to supervise most effectively in a workplace with diverse employees and avoid disputes arising from ineffective communications ?

x

g. ensure the provision of requested religious accommodations when such accommodations do not cause an undue hardship?

x

h. ensure the provision of requested disability accommodations to qualified individuals with disabilities when such accommodations do not cause an undue hardship?

x

10. Have all employees been informed about what behaviors are inappropriate in the workplace and that this behavior may result in disciplinary actions?

x

11. Describe what means were utilized by the agency to so inform its workforce about the penalties for unacceptable behavior.

12. Have the procedures for reasonable accommodation for individuals with disabilities been made readily available/accessible to all employees by disseminating such procedures during orientation of new employees and by making such procedures available on the World Wide Web or Internet?

x

13. Have managers and supervisor been trained on their responsibilities under the procedures for reasonable accommodation?

x

Essential Element B: INTEGRATION OF EEO INTO THE AGENCY'S STRATEGIC MISSION Requires that the agency's EEO programs be organized and structured to maintain a workplace that is free from discrimination in any of the agency's policies, procedures or practices and supports the agency's strategic mission.

5


The reporting structure for the EEO Program provides the Principal EEO Official with appropriate authority and resources to effectively

carry out a successful EEO Program.

Measure has been met

For all unmet measures, provide a brief explanation

in the space below or complete and attach an

EEOC FORM 715-01 PART H to the agency's status

report

Measures Yes No

14. Is the EEO Director under the direct supervision of the agency head? [see 29 CFR §1614.102(b)(4)] For subordinate level reporting components, is the EEO Director/Officer under the immediate supervision of the lower level component's head official?

x EEO Director is under the direct supervision of the Deputy Assistant Secretary-Human Capital and Diversity. Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety and Environment Enforcement (No), National Park Service (No), Office of the Secretary (No) and U.S. Geological Survey (No) Bureau of Indian Affairs (Yes), Bureau of Land Management (Yes), Bureau of Reclamation (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes) and the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (Yes)

15. Are the duties and responsibilities of EEO officials clearly defined? x

16. Do the EEO officials have the knowledge, skills, and abilities to carry out the duties and responsibilities of their positions?

x

17. If the agency has 2nd level reporting components, are there organizational charts that clearly define the reporting structure for EEO programs?

x

18. If the agency has 2nd level reporting components, does the agency-wide EEO Director have authority for the EEO programs within the subordinate reporting components?

x U.S. Geological Survey (No), National Park Service (No)

6

If not, please describe how EEO program authority is delegated to subordinate reporting components.

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (Yes), Office of the Secretary (Yes), Bureau of Indian Affairs (Yes), Bureau of Land Management (Yes), Bureau of Reclamation (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes) and Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement (Yes)

Compliance Indicator The EEO Director and other EEO professional staff responsible for

EEO programs have regular and effective means of informing the agency head and senior management officials of the status of EEO

programs and are involved in, and consulted on, management/personnel actions.

Measure has been

met For all unmet measures,

provide a brief explanation in the space below or complete

and attach an EEOC FORM 715-01 PART H to the agency's status report

Measures Yes No

19. Does the EEO Director/Officer have a regular and effective means of informing the agency head and other top management officials of the effectiveness, efficiency and legal compliance of the agency's EEO program?

x

20. Following the submission of the immediately preceding FORM 715-01, did the EEO Director/Officer present to the head of the agency and other senior officials the "State of the Agency" briefing covering all components of the EEO report, including an assessment of the performance of the agency in each of the six elements of the Model EEO Program and a report on the progress of the agency in completing its barrier analysis including any barriers it identified and/or eliminated or reduced the impact of?

x See Part H, Deficiency Office of the Secretary (No) Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (Yes), Bureau of Indian Affairs (Yes), Bureau of Land Management (Yes), Bureau of Reclamation (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes), U.S. Geological Survey (Yes), National Park Service (Yes) and the Office of Surface Mining,

7

Reclamation and Enforcement (Yes)

21. Are EEO program officials present during agency deliberations prior to decisions regarding recruitment strategies, vacancy projections, succession planning, selections for training/career development opportunities, and other workforce changes?

x

22. Does the agency consider whether any group of employees or applicants might be negatively impacted prior to making human resource decisions such as re-organizations and re-alignments?

x

23. Are management/personnel policies, procedures and practices examined at regular intervals to assess whether there are hidden impediments to the realization of equality of opportunity for any group(s) of employees or applicants? [see 29 C.F.R. § 1614.102(b)(3)]

x See Part H, Deficiency Bureau of Indian Affairs (No), Bureau of Land Management (No), Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (No) Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (Yes), Bureau of Reclamation (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes), Office of the Secretary (Yes), U.S. Geological Survey (Yes) and National Park Service (Yes)

24. Is the EEO Director included in the agency's strategic planning, especially the agency's human capital plan, regarding succession planning, training, etc., to ensure that EEO concerns are integrated into the agency's strategic mission?

x


The agency has committed sufficient human resources and budget allocations to its EEO programs to ensure successful

operation.

Measure has been

met

For all unmet measures, provide a brief explanation in the space below or complete


Measures Yes No

8

25. Does the EEO Director have the authority and funding to ensure implementation of agency EEO action plans to improve EEO program efficiency and/or eliminate identified barriers to the realization of equality of opportunity?

x

26. Are sufficient personnel resources allocated to the EEO Program to ensure that agency self-assessments and self-analyses prescribed by EEO MD-715 are conducted annually and to maintain an effective complaint processing system?

x

27. Are statutory/regulatory EEO related Special Emphasis Programs sufficiently staffed? x See Part H, Deficiency National Park Service (No) Bureau of Indian Affairs (Yes), Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (Yes), Bureau of Reclamation (Yes), Bureau of Land Management (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes), Office of the Secretary (Yes), U.S. Geological Survey (Yes) and Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (Yes)

a. Federal Women's Program - 5 U.S.C. 7201; 38 U.S.C. 4214; Title 5 CFR, Subpart B, 720.204

x See Part H, Deficiency National Park Service (No) Bureau of Indian Affairs (Yes), Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (Yes), Bureau of Reclamation (Yes), Bureau of Land Management (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes), Office of the Secretary (Yes), U.S. Geological Survey (Yes) and Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (Yes)

9

b. Hispanic Employment Program - Title 5 CFR, Subpart B, 720.204 X See Part H, Deficiency National Park Service (No) Bureau of Indian Affairs (Yes), Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (Yes), Bureau of Reclamation (Yes), Bureau of Land Management (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes), Office of the Secretary (Yes), U.S. Geological Survey (Yes) and Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (Yes)

c. People With Disabilities Program Manager; Selective Placement Program for Individuals With Disabilities - Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act; Title 5 U.S.C. Subpart B, Chapter 31, Subchapter I-3102; 5 CFR 213.3102(t) and (u); 5 CFR 315.709

x See Part H, Deficiency National Park Service (No) Bureau of Indian Affairs (Yes), Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (Yes), Bureau of Reclamation (Yes), Bureau of Land Management (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes), Office of the Secretary (Yes), U.S. Geological Survey (Yes) and Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (Yes)

28. Are other agency special emphasis programs monitored by the EEO Office for coordination and compliance with EEO guidelines and principles, such as FEORP - 5 CFR 720; Veterans Employment Programs; and Black/African American; American Indian/Alaska Native, Asian American/Pacific Islander programs?

X National Park Service (No) Bureau of Indian Affairs (Yes), Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (Yes), Bureau of Reclamation (Yes), Bureau of Land Management (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes), Office of

10

the Secretary (Yes), U.S. Geological Survey (Yes) and Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (Yes)


The agency has committed sufficient budget to support the success of its EEO Programs.




Measures Yes No

29. Are there sufficient resources to enable the agency to conduct a thorough barrier analysis of its workforce, including the provision of adequate data collection and tracking systems

x See Part H, Deficiency U.S. Geological Survey (No), National Park Service (No) Bureau of Indian Affairs (Yes), Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (Yes), Bureau of Reclamation (Yes), Bureau of Land Management (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes), Office of the Secretary (Yes), and Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (Yes)

30. Is there sufficient budget allocated to all employees to utilize, when desired, all EEO programs, including the complaint processing program and ADR, and to make a request for reasonable accommodation? (Including subordinate level reporting components?)

x

31. Has funding been secured for publication and distribution of EEO materials (e.g. harassment policies, EEO posters, reasonable accommodations procedures, etc.)?

x

32. Is there a central fund or other mechanism for funding supplies, equipment and services necessary to provide disability accommodations?

x

33. Does the agency fund major renovation projects to ensure timely compliance with Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards?

x

34. Is the EEO Program allocated sufficient resources to train all employees on EEO Programs, including administrative and judicial remedial procedures available to employees?

x

11

a. Is there sufficient funding to ensure the prominent posting of written materials in all personnel and EEO offices? [see 29 C.F.R. § 1614.102(b)(5)]

x

b. Is there sufficient funding to ensure that all employees have access to this training and information?

x

35. Is there sufficient funding to provide all managers and supervisors with training and periodic up-dates on their EEO responsibilities:

x

a. for ensuring a workplace that is free from all forms of discrimination, including harassment and retaliation?

x

b. to provide religious accommodations? x

c. to provide disability accommodations in accordance with the agency's written procedures?

x

d. in the EEO discrimination complaint process? x

e. to participate in ADR? x

Essential Element C: MANAGEMENT AND PROGRAM ACCOUNTABILITY This element requires the Agency Head to hold all managers, supervisors, and EEO Officials responsible for the effective implementation of the agency's EEO Program and Plan.

Compliance Indicator EEO program officials advise and provide appropriate assistance

to managers/supervisors about the status of EEO programs within each manager's or supervisor's area or responsibility.




Measures Yes No

36. Are regular (monthly/quarterly/semi-annually) EEO updates provided to management/supervisory officials by EEO program officials?

x

12

37. Do EEO program officials coordinate the development and implementation of EEO Plans with all appropriate agency managers to include Agency Counsel, Human Resource Officials, Finance, and the Chief information Officer?

x

Compliance Indicator The Human Resources Director and the EEO Director meet

regularly to assess whether personnel programs, policies, and procedures are in conformity with instructions contained in EEOC

management directives. [see 29 CFR § 1614.102(b)(3)]




Measures Yes No

38. Have time-tables or schedules been established for the agency to review its Merit Promotion Program Policy and Procedures for systemic barriers that may be impeding full participation in promotion opportunities by all groups?

x See Part H, Deficiency Bureau of Land Management (No), Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (No) Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (Yes), Office of the Secretary (Yes), Bureau of Indian Affairs (Yes), Bureau of Reclamation (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes), U.S. Geological Survey (Yes) and National Park Service (Yes)

39. Have time-tables or schedules been established for the agency to review its Employee Recognition Awards Program and Procedures for systemic barriers that may be impeding full participation in the program by all groups?

x See Part H, Deficiency Bureau of Indian Affairs (No), Bureau of Land Management (No) Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (Yes), Bureau of Reclamation (Yes), Office of the Secretary (Yes), Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes), U.S. Geological Survey (Yes) and National Park Service (Yes), Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (Yes)

13

40. Have time-tables or schedules been established for the agency to review its Employee Development/Training Programs for systemic barriers that may be impeding full participation in training opportunities by all groups?

x See Part H, Deficiency Bureau of Indian Affairs (No), Bureau of Land Management (No), Office of the Secretary (No) Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (Yes), Bureau of Reclamation (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes), U.S. Geological Survey (Yes) and National Park Service (Yes), Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (Yes)


When findings of discrimination are made, the agency explores whether or not disciplinary actions should be taken.




Measures Yes No

41. Does the agency have a disciplinary policy and/or a table of penalties that covers employees found to have committed discrimination?

x

42. Have all employees, supervisors, and managers been informed as to the penalties for being found to perpetrate discriminatory behavior or for taking personnel actions based upon a prohibited basis?

x

43. Has the agency, when appropriate, disciplined or sanctioned managers/supervisors or employees found to have discriminated over the past two years?

x See Part H, Deficiency Office of the Secretary (No) Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (Yes), Bureau of Indian Affairs

14

(Yes), Bureau of Land Management (Yes) Bureau of Reclamation (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes), U.S. Geological Survey (Yes) and National Park Service (Yes), Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (Yes)

If so, cite number found to have discriminated and list penalty /disciplinary action for each type of violation. FY 2015 – 2 Findings of Discrimination. Received a letter of reprimand. EEO compliance training ordered as corrective action in each finding FY 2014 – 0 Findings of Discrimination

44. Does the agency promptly (within the established time frame) comply with EEOC, Merit Systems Protection Board, Federal Labor Relations Authority, labor arbitrators, and District Court orders?

x

45. Does the agency review disability accommodation decisions/actions to ensure compliance with its written procedures and analyze the information tracked for trends, problems, etc.?

x

Essential Element D: PROACTIVE PREVENTION Requires that the agency head makes early efforts to prevent discriminatory actions and eliminate barriers to equal employment opportunity in the workplace.


Analyses to identify and remove unnecessary barriers to employment are conducted throughout the year.




Measures Yes No

46. Do senior managers meet with and assist the EEO Director and/or other EEO Program Officials in the identification of barriers that may be impeding the realization of equal employment opportunity?

x

47. When barriers are identified, do senior managers develop and implement, with the x

15

assistance of the agency EEO office, agency EEO Action Plans to eliminate said barriers?

48. Do senior managers successfully implement EEO Action Plans and incorporate the EEO Action Plan Objectives into agency strategic plans?

x

49. Are trend analyses of workforce profiles conducted by race, national origin, sex and disability?

x See Part H, Deficiency National Park Service (No), U.S. Geological Survey (No) Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (Yes), Office of the Secretary (Yes), Bureau of Indian Affairs (Yes), Bureau of Land Management (Yes), Bureau of Reclamation (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes) and Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement (Yes)

50. Are trend analyses of the workforce's major occupations conducted by race, national origin, sex and disability?


51. Are trends analyses of the workforce's grade level distribution conducted by race, national origin, sex and disability?

x See Part H, Deficiency National Park Service (No), U.S. Geological Survey (No) Bureau of Ocean Energy

16

Management/Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (Yes), Office of the Secretary (Yes), Bureau of Indian Affairs (Yes), Bureau of Land Management (Yes), Bureau of Reclamation (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes) and Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement (Yes)

52. Are trend analyses of the workforce's compensation and reward system conducted by race, national origin, sex and disability?


53. Are trend analyses of the effects of management/personnel policies, procedures and practices conducted by race, national origin, sex and disability?

x See Part H, Deficiency National Park Service (No), Office of the Secretary (No), U.S. Geological Survey (No) Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (Yes), Bureau of Indian Affairs (Yes), Bureau of Land Management (Yes), Bureau of Reclamation (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes) and Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement (Yes)

17


The use of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is encouraged by senior management.


For all unmet measures, provide a brief explanation in the space

below or complete and attach an EEOC FORM 715-01 PART H to

the agency's status report

Measures Yes No

54. Are all employees encouraged to use ADR? x

55. Is the participation of supervisors and managers in the ADR process required? x

Essential Element E: EFFICIENCY Requires that the agency head ensure that there are effective systems in place for evaluating the impact and effectiveness of the agency's EEO Programs as well as an efficient and fair dispute resolution process.


The agency has sufficient staffing, funding, and authority to achieve the elimination of identified barriers.



below or complete and attach an EEOC FORM 715-01 PART H to

the agency's status report

Measures Yes No

56. Does the EEO Office employ personnel with adequate training and experience to conduct the analyses required by MD-715 and these instructions?

X National Park Service (No) Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety Environmental Enforcement (Yes), Office of the Secretary (Yes), Bureau of Indian Affairs (Yes), Bureau of Land Management (Yes), Bureau of Reclamation (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes) U.S. Geological Survey (Yes)and Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and

18

Enforcement (Yes)

57. Has the agency implemented an adequate data collection and analysis systems that permit tracking of the information required by MD-715 and these instructions?

x See Part H, Deficiency Bureau of Energy Management/Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (No), Office of the Secretary (No), U.S. Geological Survey (No) Bureau of Indian Affairs (Yes), Bureau of Land Management (Yes), Bureau of Reclamation (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes), Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (Yes) and National Park Service (Yes)

58. Have sufficient resources been provided to conduct effective audits of field facilities' efforts to achieve a model EEO program and eliminate discrimination under Title VII and the Rehabilitation Act?

x

59. Is there a designated agency official or other mechanism in place to coordinate or assist with processing requests for disability accommodations in all major components of the agency?

x

60. Are 90% of accommodation requests processed within the time frame set forth in the agency procedures for reasonable accommodation?

x See Part H, Deficiency National Park Service (No) Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety Environmental Enforcement (Yes), Office of the Secretary (Yes), Bureau of Indian Affairs (Yes), Bureau of Land Management (Yes), Bureau of Reclamation (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes) U.S. Geological Survey (Yes) and Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (Yes)

Compliance The agency has an effective complaint tracking and monitoring Measure has For all unmet measures, provide

19

Indicator system in place to increase the effectiveness of the agency's EEO Programs.

been met a brief explanation in the space below or complete and attach an

EEOC FORM 715-01 PART H to the agency's status report

Measures Yes No

61. Does the agency use a complaint tracking and monitoring system that allows identification of the location and status of complaints and length of time elapsed at each stage of the agency's complaint resolution process?

x

62. Does the agency's tracking system identify the issues and bases of the complaints, the aggrieved individuals/complainants, the involved management officials and other information to analyze complaint activity and trends?

x

63. Does the agency hold contractors accountable for delay in counseling and investigation processing times?

x

If yes, briefly describe how: If contractor consistently presents untimely and ineffective products, contractual relationship is terminated.

64. Does the agency monitor and ensure that new investigators, counselors, including contract and collateral duty investigators, receive the 32 hours of training required in accordance with EEO Management Directive MD-110?

x

65. Does the agency monitor and ensure that experienced counselors, investigators, including contract and collateral duty investigators, receive the 8 hours of refresher training required on an annual basis in accordance with EEO Management Directive MD-110?

x

Compliance Indicator The agency has sufficient staffing, funding and authority to

comply with the time frames in accordance with the EEOC (29 C.F.R. Part 1614) regulations for processing EEO complaints of

employment discrimination.



below or complete and attach an EEOC FORM 715-01 PART H to the

agency's status report Measures Yes No

66. Are benchmarks in place that compares the agency's discrimination complaint processes with 29 C.F.R. Part 1614?

x

a. Does the agency provide timely EEO counseling within 30 days of the initial request or x

20

within an agreed upon extension in writing, up to 60 days?

b. Does the agency provide an aggrieved person with written notification of his/her rights and responsibilities in the EEO process in a timely fashion?

x

c. Does the agency complete the investigations within the applicable prescribed time frame?

x See Part H, Deficiency Bureau of Reclamation (No), National Park Service (No) and U.S. Geological Survey (No) Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety Environmental Enforcement (Yes), Office of the Secretary (Yes), Bureau of Land Management (Yes), Bureau of Indian Affairs (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes) Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (Yes),

d. When a complainant requests a final agency decision, does the agency issue the decision within 60 days of the request?

x Final agency decisions are issued at the Departmental Office of Civil Rights. 70% were timely. Bureau of Reclamation (No) Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety Environmental Enforcement (Yes), Office of the Secretary (Yes), Bureau of Indian Affairs (Yes), Bureau of Land Management (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes) U.S. Geological Survey (Yes), National Park Service (Yes), and the Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement (Yes)

e. When a complainant requests a hearing, does the agency immediately upon receipt of the request from the EEOC AJ forward the investigative file to the EEOC Hearing Office?

x National Park Service (No)

21

Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety Environmental Enforcement (Yes), Office of the Secretary (Yes), Bureau of Indian Affairs (Yes), Bureau of Land Management (Yes), Bureau of Reclamation (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes) U.S. Geological Survey (Yes) and Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement (Yes)

f. When a settlement agreement is entered into, does the agency timely complete any obligations provided for in such agreements?

x

g. Does the agency ensure timely compliance with EEOC AJ decisions which are not the subject of an appeal by the agency?

x

Compliance Indicator There is an efficient and fair dispute resolution process and

effective systems for evaluating the impact and effectiveness of the agency's EEO complaint processing program.





67. In accordance with 29 C.F.R. §1614.102(b), has the agency established an ADR Program during the pre-complaint and formal complaint stages of the EEO process?

x

68. Does the agency require all managers and supervisors to receive ADR training in accordance with EEOC (29 C.F.R. Part 1614) regulations, with emphasis on the federal government's interest in encouraging mutual resolution of disputes and the benefits associated with utilizing ADR?

x

69. After the agency has offered ADR and the complainant has elected to participate in ADR, are the managers required to participate?

x

70. Does the responsible management official directly involved in the dispute have settlement authority?

x


The agency has effective systems in place for maintaining and evaluating the impact and effectiveness of its EEO programs.



22

Measures Yes No below or complete and attach an EEOC FORM 715-01 PART H to the

agency's status report

71. Does the agency have a system of management controls in place to ensure the timely, accurate, complete and consistent reporting of EEO complaint data to the EEOC?

x

72. Does the agency provide reasonable resources for the EEO complaint process to ensure efficient and successful operation in accordance with 29 C.F.R. § 1614.102(a)(1)?

x

73. Does the agency EEO office have management controls in place to monitor and ensure that the data received from Human Resources is accurate, timely received, and contains all the required data elements for submitting annual reports to the EEOC?

x

74. Do the agency's EEO programs address all of the laws enforced by the EEOC? x

75. Does the agency identify and monitor significant trends in complaint processing to determine whether the agency is meeting its obligations under Title VII and the Rehabilitation Act?

x

76. Does the agency track recruitment efforts and analyze efforts to identify potential barriers in accordance with MD-715 standards?

x See Part H, Deficiency National Park Service (No), Office of the Secretary (No), U.S. Geological Survey (No) Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (Yes), Bureau of Indian Affairs (Yes), Bureau of Land Management (Yes), Bureau of Reclamation (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes) and Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement (Yes)

77. Does the agency consult with other agencies of similar size on the effectiveness of their EEO programs to identify best practices and share ideas?

x


The agency ensures that the investigation and adjudication function of its complaint resolution process are separate from its



23

Measures legal defense arm of agency or other offices with conflicting or competing interests.

Yes No below or complete and attach an EEOC FORM 715-01 PART H to the


78. Are legal sufficiency reviews of EEO matters handled by a functional unit that is separate and apart from the unit which handles agency representation in EEO complaints?

x

79. Does the agency discrimination complaint process ensure a neutral adjudication function? x

80. If applicable, are processing time frames incorporated for the legal counsel's sufficiency review for timely processing of complaints?

x

Essential Element F: RESPONSIVENESS AND LEGAL COMPLIANCE This element requires that federal agencies are in full compliance with EEO statutes and EEOC regulations, policy guidance, and other written instructions.

Compliance Indicator Agency personnel are accountable for timely compliance with

orders issued by EEOC Administrative Judges.





81. Does the agency have a system of management controls to ensure that agency officials timely comply with any orders or directives issued by EEOC Administrative Judges?

x

Compliance Indicator The agency's system of management controls ensures that the

agency timely completes all ordered corrective action and submits its compliance report to EEOC within 30 days of such

completion.





82. Does the agency have control over the payroll processing function of the agency? If Yes, answer the two questions below.

x Bureau of Ocean Energy Management/Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (No) Bureau of Indian Affairs (Yes), Bureau of Land Management (Yes), Office of

24

the Secretary (Yes), Bureau of Reclamation (Yes), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Yes), National Park Service (Yes), U.S. Geological Survey (Yes) and Office of Surface Mining, Reclamation and Enforcement (Yes)

a. Are there steps in place to guarantee responsive, timely, and predictable processing of ordered monetary relief?

x

b. Are procedures in place to promptly process other forms of ordered relief? x


Agency personnel are accountable for the timely completion of actions required to comply with orders of EEOC.





Measures Yes No

83. Is compliance with EEOC orders encompassed in the performance standards of any agency employees?

x

If so, please identify the employees by title in the comments section, and state how performance is measured.

84. Is the unit charged with the responsibility for compliance with EEOC orders located in the EEO office?

x

If not, please identify the unit in which it is located, the number of employees in the unit, and their grade levels in the comments section.

85. Have the involved employees received any formal training in EEO compliance? x

86. Does the agency promptly provide to the EEOC the following documentation for completing compliance:

x

25

a. Attorney Fees: Copy of check issued for attorney fees and /or a narrative statement by an appropriate agency official, or agency payment order dating the dollar amount of attorney fees paid?

x

b. Awards: A narrative statement by an appropriate agency official stating the dollar amount and the criteria used to calculate the award?

x

c. Back Pay and Interest: Computer print-outs or payroll documents outlining gross back pay and interest, copy of any checks issued, narrative statement by an appropriate agency official of total monies paid?

x

d. Compensatory Damages: The final agency decision and evidence of payment, if made?

x

e. Training: Attendance roster at training session(s) or a narrative statement by an appropriate agency official confirming that specific persons or groups of persons attended training on a date certain?

x

f. Personnel Actions (e.g., Reinstatement, Promotion, Hiring, Reassignment): Copies of SF-50s

x

g. Posting of Notice of Violation: Original signed and dated notice reflecting the dates that the notice was posted. A copy of the notice will suffice if the original is not available.

x

h. Supplemental Investigation: 1. Copy of letter to complainant acknowledging receipt from EEOC of remanded case. 2. Copy of letter to complainant transmitting the Report of Investigation (not the ROI itself unless specified). 3. Copy of request for a hearing (complainant's request or agency's transmittal letter).

x

i. Final Agency Decision (FAD): FAD or copy of the complainant's request for a hearing. x

j. Restoration of Leave: Print-out or statement identifying the amount of leave restored, if applicable. If not, an explanation or statement.

x

k. Civil Actions: A complete copy of the civil action complaint demonstrating same issues raised as in compliance matter.

x

l. Settlement Agreements: Signed and dated agreement with specific dollar amounts, if applicable. Also, appropriate documentation of relief is provided.

x

1

EEOC FORM 715-01 PART H

U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

FEDERAL AGENCY ANNUAL EEO PROGRAM STATUS REPORT EEO Plan to Attain the Essential Elements of a Model EEO Program

FY _2015____ Department of the Interior STATEMENT of MODEL PROGRAM ESSENTIAL ELEMENT DEFICIENCY:

Element One: Demonstrated Commitment from Agency Leadership Was the EEO policy Statement issued within 6-9 months of the installation of the Agency Head? During the current Agency Head’s tenure, has the EEO policy Statement been re-issued annually? The EEO and Anti-Harassment statement policies have not been issued by the Agency Head.

OBJECTIVE: Ensure written policies exist, and are disseminated DOI-wide, that expresses commitment to creating and maintaining a workplace free of discrimination and harassment.

RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL:

Secretary of Interior; Director, Office of Civil Rights (OCR); Director, Office of Human Resources (OHR); Office of the Solicitor (SOL); Office of Communications (OCO); Bureau Heads, Bureau EEO and HR Offices

DATE OBJECTIVE INITIATED:

April 12, 2013

TARGET DATE FOR COMPLETION OF OBJECTIVE:

September 30, 2016

PLANNED ACTIVITIES TOWARD COMPLETION OF OBJECTIVE:

TARGET DATE (Must be specific)

1) The draft EEO and Anti-harassment policy statements are currently in the review and clearance process. The draft statements: 1) covers non-sexual harassment and sexual harassment; 2) provides employees and applicants with multiple avenues for filing complaints alleging harassment; and 3) notifies employees and applicants for federal employment that claims of harassment will be kept confidential to the extent possible.

9/30/2016

2) OCR will monitor the vetting process of the updated EEO and Anti-Harassment policies statement to ensure that it is issued in FY 2016.

Ongoing

2

3) Secretary will issue new EEO and Anti-Harassment policies that meets EEOC requirements.

9/30/2016

4) OCR, OHR, OCO, Bureau Heads, and Bureau EEO and HR offices will disseminate the new policies throughout the Department.

9/30/2016

5) Post EEO and Anti-Harassment policies on the DOI website.

9/30/2016

5) Post EEO and Anti-Harassment posters throughout common areas Department-wide.

9/30/2016

6) Issue the EEO and Anti-Harassment policy statements during new employee orientation training.

9/30/2016

7) Issue the EEO and Anti-Harassment policy statements to new supervisors upon appointment.

9/30/2016

REPORT OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS and MODIFICATIONS TO OBJECTIVE Last year’s planned activities to issue the EEO and Anti-Harassment policies were not accomplished by the original target date, due to competing priorities. Accordingly, target dates have been modified to Fiscal Year 2016. Once DOI issues the new policy statements, the Department will provide refresher training its managers and supervisors and ensure the statements are available to employees and applicants for employment.

FY _2015____ Department of the Interior STATEMENT of MODEL PROGRAM ESSENTIAL ELEMENT DEFICIENCY:

Element Two: Making EEO an Integral Part of the Agency’s Strategic Mission Is the EEO Director under the direct supervision of the Agency Head? [see 29 CFR §1614.102(b)(4)]

OBJECTIVE: Ensure sufficient resources are allocated to the EEO program to ensure program operates efficiently and effectively to identify and eliminate barriers to equality of opportunity.


Secretary of Interior; Principle Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Management and Budget, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Human Capital & Diversity, Director, Office of Civil Rights

3


April 12, 2013


September 30, 2016



1) Maintain a reporting structure that provides the agency’s EEO director with regular access to the agency head and other senior management officials for reporting on the effectiveness, efficiency and legal compliance of the agency’s Title VII and Rehabilitation Act programs.

Ongoing

2) Develop a plan to ensure the DOI’s Civil Rights Director will deliver future briefings directly to the Deputy Secretary and Assistant Secretary, and Assistant Secretary Policy, Management and Budget and Chief Financial Officer.

Ongoing

REPORT OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS and MODIFICATIONS TO OBJECTIVE In FY 2015, the Civil Rights Director continued to report to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Human Capital and Diversity and has complete access to the agency head and senior management officials. Together with the direct access reporting structure, the presentation of the state-of the-agency briefing directly to the agency head and agency executive leadership is a key component of ensuring integration of EEO into the agency’s strategic mission.

FY 2015_____ Department of the Interior

STATEMENT of MODEL PROGRAM ESSENTIAL ELEMENT DEFICIENCY:

Element Four : Proactive Prevention Barrier Identification and Elimination.

OBJECTIVE: Uncover, examine and remove barriers to equal participation at all levels of the workforce.


Director, Office of Civil Rights (OCR); Director, Office of Human Resources (OHR); Director, Interior Business Center (IBC); Office of the Solicitor (SOL); Bureau EEO and HR Offices; Managers and Supervisors

4


July 1, 2015


September 30, 2018

1) Provide barrier analysis training for project leads and bureau and Office of the Secretary Project Teams (starting training in July 2015).

Ongoing

2) Develop barrier analysis project plan. 9/30/2016

3) Analyze workforce data for mission critical occupations to identify potential barriers.

9/30/2018

4) Investigate potential barriers to pinpoint actual barriers.

9/30/2018

5) Create action plan to address barrier causes, determine if barriers are job-related and consistent with business necessity. If not, develop plan to eliminate barrier. Consider modifications where barriers are job-related, report plan and progress in annual MD-715 Report.

9/30/2019

6) Assess success of the plan, track progress, and hold key management officials accountable, conduct periodic re-assessments to discover if plan needs adjusting.

9/30/2019

REPORT OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS and MODIFICATIONS TO OBJECTIVE In FY 2015, DOI launched the first phase of its first-ever full-scale barrier analysis project, which involved EEOC facilitators conducting a train-the-trainer session for 35 team members. The team members in turn provided 2-day training courses and barrier analysis tools to project leads and bureau and Office of the Secretary project teams across DOI. More than 100 employees, including managers and supervisors were trained in FY 2015.

5

FY _2015____ Department of the Interior


Element Five: Efficiency Has the agency implemented an adequate data collection and analysis systems that permit tracking of the information required by MD-715 and these instructions? The department does not have a standardized system and procedures for tracking applicant flow data (AFD). Integrate applicant flow data with DOI’s MD 715 reporting system. Currently Tables A/B 8, 9, 11, and 12 are lacking AFD as required by EEOC.

OBJECTIVE: Expand and clarify the data collection process in order to allow DOI to perform accurate and comprehensive analyses in the future.


Director, Office of Civil Rights (OCR); Director, Office of Human Resources (OHR); Director, Interior Business Center (IBC); Director, Office of Strategic Employee and Organizational Development (OSEOD); Bureau EEO and HR Offices


September 30, 2013


September 30, 2018



1) Interior Business Center (IBC) will implement the Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition (OBIEE) system,

9/30/2016

6

which will provide more effective and efficient capture and reporting of data.

2) IBC will conduct training for the EEO users of OBIEE system.

9/30/2016

3) Establish and implement an effective process to track and analyze the Agency’s recruitment efforts.

Ongoing

4) Collaborate with Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to receive and analyze USAJOBS applicant data.

Ongoing

5) Collaborate with the Monster Hiring System to receive and analyze applicant data.

Ongoing

6) Benchmark the practices at other agencies for obtaining applicant flow data.

Ongoing

7) Develop consensus within DOI for implementing a centralized applicant flow and recruitment data system.

9/30/2018

8) Advocate for funding to purchase and build out the system using a phased approach.

9/30/2018

REPORT OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS and MODIFICATIONS TO OBJECTIVE Uniform and consistent capture of applicant flow data continued to be a challenge for the Department in FY 2015. Among the ten bureaus, six utilize USA OPM Staffing and four utilize Monster as their hiring management systems. To address this challenge for the bureaus that use USA OPM Staffing, the Department initiated a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with OPM USA Staffing for capture and reporting of applicant flow data (AFD) in FY 2014. Bureaus that have individual contracts with Monster were instructed to work with Monster to ensure procedures are put in place to capture applicant flow data.

Four of ten Bureaus were able to provide complete or partial applicant, selection, and career developmental data. Full implementation is expected in FY 2018.

7



Element Five: Efficiency Does the agency complete the investigations within the applicable prescribed timeframes? Timeframe to conduct investigations exceeded established guidelines in FY 2015.

OBJECTIVE: To ensure that EEO investigations are consistently completed within the timeframes prescribed by EEOC MD 110 and 29 C.F.R. Part 1614.


Director, Office of Civil Rights; Bureau EEO Directors; Employment Complaints and Adjudication Division (ECAD) Chief


October 1, 2014


September 30, 2017



1) OCR will develop and implement management control procedures to improve the timeliness of EEO counseling.

Ongoing

2) OCR will develop and implement management control procedures to improve the timeliness of complaint investigations.

Ongoing

8

3) OCR will ensure that professional training and certification are available for EEO counselors.

Ongoing

4) Coordinate with Bureaus to develop streamlined review processes to expedite issuance of Report of Investigations (ROIs).

Ongoing

REPORT OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS and MODIFICATIONS TO OBJECTIVE The Employment Complaints and Adjudication Division (ECAD) created and launched an innovative google website, named the Employment Complaints and Adjudication Division Resource Center. The google website was developed for senior EEO officials and over 100 equal employment opportunity (EEO) practitioners across the Agency as a one-stop resource for complaints adjudication and processing policy, guidance, legal authority, samples and templates. The google website significantly improved access to and visibility of the Division staff and enhanced the Division’s role in providing technical advice, guidance and assistance to Bureau and Office of the Secretary EEO practitioners on complaints processing and adjudication. The google website has been widely praised and touted by the Office of Civil Rights Director and senior EEO officials and practitioners throughout the Agency. Since the launch of the website in January 2015, the site has been viewed over 2000 times. ECAD has already begun putting a process in place which includes weekly updates of all information in the electronic tracking system (iComplaints), which is reported weekly via written status reports and during bi-weekly staff discussions. ECAD hosted iComplaints user update training for EEO personnel across the Department. These sessions created an opportunity for Bureaus EEO personnel to enhance their knowledge and effective use of this comprehensive tracking and reporting system. It was well received by participants, resulting in more accurate data input and also enabling Bureaus EEO personnel to better utilize the system’s advanced reporting features. The Department submitted to EEOC a timely and accurate annual EEO statistical report (EEOC FORM 462) for the first time in more than 25 years. ECAD coordinated with Bureaus to revise the EEO complaint processing procedures. This coordination effort allowed DOI and Bureaus to review and revise procedures regarding EEO investigations focusing on the timeliness of conducting investigations, reviewing and issuing EEO reports of investigations. The revised

9

complaint procedures were issued in FY 2015. The investigative guidelines were reviewed by the ECAD Chief, and clarified with representatives of the Bureaus EEO personnel. Investigative procedures and guidelines were communicated to EEO/HR practitioners and Bureaus representatives during the FY 2015. These efforts resulted in an incremental but steady increase in the timely processing of complaints. Also, the Department timely issued Final Agency Decisions (FADs) rate was improved from 2.5 percent in FY2014 to 70 percent in FY 2015. The technical competence of EEO professionals has significantly improved in FY 2015. OCR requested and attained approval for an OCR Technical Training Symposium that brought more than 100 EEO practitioners, HR professionals, DOI Bureau Deputy Directors, SOL and more than 20 expert trainers to US Fish and Wildlife Service's National Conservation Training Center (NCTC) in Shepherdstown, West Virginia. This course was well received by participants and its effectiveness reflected in an increase in the timely processing of EEO complaints in FY 2015 when compared to FY 2014.

OCR attained unfunded requirement approval ($225K) and contracting award to create a live-action interactive video simulation that has been shown to help users retain learning content while improving individual decision-making and performance. This product will give DOI the capability to combine 3 mandatory training requirements (EEO, Diversity, No FEAR Act), which will lessen the time employees spend on training and positively impact productivity. OCR has begun to put in place a process for reporting deficiencies on contract firms that fail to meet counseling and investigative timelines.



Element Five: Efficiency: Are 90% of reasonable accommodation requests processed within the time frame set forth in the agency procedures for reasonable accommodation?

10

Enhance current data systems and to develop necessary tracking/monitoring systems.

OBJECTIVE: Establish and deploy a DOI-wide centralized reasonable accommodation system to track timely processing of requests.


Director, Office of Civil Rights (OCR); Director, Office of Human Resources (OHR); Director, Interior Business Center (IBC); Office of the Solicitor (SOL); Bureau EEO and HR Offices


October 1, 2014


September 30, 2018



1) Develop a database warehouse for a reasonable accommodation system of records, thereby improving the timeframes to handle the request.

9/30/2018

2) Monitor timeliness and denial rates. Provide quarterly feedback to the components.

9/30/2018

3) Ensure that all managers/supervisors receive training on their reasonable accommodation responsibilities and on reasonable accommodation procedures.

Ongoing

REPORT OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS and MODIFICATIONS TO OBJECTIVE This is a new plan therefore we have no accomplishments to report.

1

EEOC FORM 715-01 PART I


EEO Plan to Eliminate Identified Barrier


STATEMENT OF CONDITION THAT WAS A TRIGGER FOR A POTENTIAL BARRIER:

Lower than expected participation rate for women in the overall workforce compared to Civilian Labor Force (CLF).

BARRIER ANALYSIS:

An analysis of EEOC Tables A3-1, A4-1, A6, A7, A8, A10, A11 and A14 revealed the conditions listed above.

STATEMENT OF IDENTIFIED BARRIER:

Provide a succinct statement of the agency policy, procedure or practice that has been determined to be the barrier of the undesired condition.

The high participation rate of women in administrative support occupations create a promotion ceiling for most DOI female employees at GS 1-11 and impact the feeder pool of eligible women candidates for promotion to senior grades. The workforce current snapshot trend data by Federal Personnel Payroll System (FPPS) were used to determine contributing factors. In addition to the FPPS, DOI also evaluated EEO complaint trends and the Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey (FEVS)

OBJECTIVE:

State the alternative or revised agency policy, procedure or practice to be implemented to correct the undesired condition.

To determine if there are potential barriers that limits the career advancement of females. To ensure the selection process is valid and fair for all employees.

2


Director, Office of Civil Rights (OCR); Director, Office of Human Resources (OHR); Director, Office of Strategic Employee and Organizational Development (OSEOD); Bureau EEO and HR Offices


October 1, 2015


September 30, 2018



1) The MD-715 Barrier Analysis Team will focus on the low participation rates for minorities, women, and Individuals with Targeted Disabilities (IWTD) in senior level positions to identify and formulate a plan to identify the root causes associated with the data in this trigger.

9/30/2018

2) Identify areas in which variations might be occurring between feeder group populations and promotion selectees (skill groups, locations, Bureaus, grade, etc.).

9/30/2018

3) Conduct statistical analyses to determine if any combination of factors emerge as significant predictive factors in participation in senior level positions.

9/30/2018

4) Conduct Advisory Committee and/or Bureau interviews to obtain information/data to better understand why:

• Certain groups apply and are selected for senior level positions

• Certain groups apply and referred for further consideration, but are not selected for senior level positions

• Certain groups apply, but are not referred for further consideration for senior level positions

• Certain groups do not apply for senior level positions

9/30/2018

3

5)Review the experience, educational level, participation in career development programs of employees who were selected for senior level positions to determine the key assets these individuals possessed that facilitated their advancement into the senior ranks, and to assess if the selection process was valid and fair.

9/30/2018

6) Based on above analysis, identify the training/developmental needs of feeder pools for senior level positions and strongly encourage these employees to update their Individual Development Plans (IDPs), and to complete the necessary training and development activities to increase their chances for advancement.

9/30/2018

7) Hold DOI Diversity Forum that invites employees to discuss: 1) why they feel the aforementioned groups have participation rates below the CLF; 2) potential barriers to EEO for these groups; 3) possible reasons why groups with lower than expected participation rates are separating from the Agency; 4) suggestions to increase their participation rates; 5) retention incentives that should be implemented to create and sustain a 21st Century workforce that reflects the diversity of the Nation; and 6) employee satisfaction.

9/30/2018

8) Use Employee Viewpoint Survey and Exit Survey to identify changes to improve employee satisfaction.

9/30/2018

REPORT OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS and MODIFICATIONS TO OBJECTIVE

This is a new plan therefore we have no accomplishments to report.

4

EEOC FORM 715-01 PART I


EEO Plan To Eliminate Identified Barrier

STATEMENT OF CONDITION THAT WAS A TRIGGER FOR A POTENTIAL BARRIER:

Lower than expected participation rate of Individuals with Targeted Disabilities (IWTD) in the total workforce and in promotions to higher level positions. The participation rate of IWTD in the DOI’s workforce was less than 1% in FY 2015.

BARRIER ANALYSIS:

A review of workforce Table B indicates group is below the CLF, the Federal Goal, and DOI hiring goals.

STATEMENT OF IDENTIFIED BARRIER:

EEOC Table B1: The participation rate for IWTD was 1% which is below Federal Goal of 2%. EEOC Table B6: There were few IWTD in the Environmental Protection Specialist (0028), Security Guard (0085), Range Technician (0455), Forestry Technician (0462), Petroleum Engineering Technician (0802), Petroleum Engineering (0881), Geophysics (1313), Hydrology (1315), Geology (1350), Gen Inspect, Investigation, Enforce, & Compliance (1801), Criminal Investigating (1811), and Dispatching (2151). There were no IWTD in the Security Administration (0080). EEOC Table B8: Only 47 (1%) qualified applicants with IWTD was hired in FY 2015. EEOC Table B11: Only 5 (1.4%) qualified IWTD was internally selected for mid/senior level (GS 13/14, GS-15, and SES) positions during the review period. EEOC Table B14: 66 (1.4%) IWTD separated from the agency (65 were voluntary separations 1 was involuntary). An analysis of EEOC Workforce Data Tables B1, B6, B8, B11, and B14 revealed the triggers, which require further evaluation to determine if there are potential barriers to EEO for IWTD.

5

OBJECTIVE: Increase the representation of Individuals with Targeted Disabilities (IWTD) to bring parity to the workforce


Director, Office of Civil Rights (OCR); Director, Office of Human Resources (OHR); Director, Office of Strategic Employee and Organizational Development (OSEOD); Bureau EEO and HR Offices


September 30, 2010


September 30, 2018

PLANNED ACTIVITIES TOWARD COMPLETION OF OBJECTIVE: TARGET DATE (Must be specific)

1) Explore recruiting strategies through state vocational centers, the Departments of Defense and Labor’s Workforce Recruitment Programs, the Operation Warfighter and Wounded Warrior programs, and Paralyzed Veterans of America.

Ongoing

2) Train managers and supervisors to insure they are aware of how the Schedule A hiring authority is used by the DOI to hire persons with severe disabilities and their role in the recruitment and hiring process.

Ongoing

3) Develop strategies to retain IWTD including training, use of centralized funds to provide reasonable accommodations, increasing access to appropriate accessible technologies, and ensuring accessibility of physical and virtual work spaces.

Ongoing

4) Survey DOI workforce to determine if there are changes in the disability status of employees.

9/30/2018

5) Survey disability organizations at universities near the DOI regional and state offices to obtain information that will improve recruitment of applicants with disabilities.

9/30/2018

6) Evaluate the career advancement opportunities for IWTD in the major/mission critical occupations.

9/30/2018

6

7) Develop strategies to increase successful return-to-work outcomes for employees who sustain work-related injuries and illnesses as defined under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act.

9/30/2018

8) OCR will review applicant flow data when they become available to identify trends regarding IWTD.

9/30/2018

9) OCR will identify any triggers from the above sources and investigate them.

9/30/2018

10) Promote the Computer/Electronic Accommodation Program (CAP)

9/30/2018

REPORT OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS and MODIFICATIONS TO OBJECTIVE

DOI is dedicated to providing full and continuing employment opportunities, internship opportunities, advancement potential, and reasonable accommodations to IWTD and disabled veterans, especially 30% or more disabled veterans. In addition to providing full consideration for announced positions, DOI will seek to hire IWTD and disabled veterans using authorized special appointment authorities and targeted recruitment efforts. OHR will continue to promote the use of Schedule A hiring authority and will encourage all hiring managers to review qualified Schedule A applicants for all positions prior to the on-line publication of the vacancy. OCR will continue to make concrete steps to strengthen its approach to Section 508 and 504 compliance. The OCR Public Civil Rights Program (PCR) began a collaborative relationship with the Navy Expeditionary Combat Command (NECC) and the National Park Service (NPS) to make National Parks and recreation sites more accessible to individuals with disabilities. This is particularly important in light of the fact that the DOI must ensure that employees and members of the public are fully able to participate in events and recreation activities at the National Parks and public lands. DOI Office of Accessible Systems & Technology team demonstrated a variety of assistive technology products (ergo keyboards, smart phones, tablets, PCs and e-readers) at the DOI FY 2015 Multicultural Day event. It improved access to and visibility of the program.

# 2722 2476 94 152 15 1 1 2 2 2 1 5 1

% 100% 91.0% 3.5% 5.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%

# 3475 2905 215 355 49 6 2 1 10 3 6 21

% 100% 83.6% 6.2% 10.2% 1.4% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0%

# 6197 5381 309 507 64 7 3 3 12 3 8 1 26 1

% 100% 86.8% 5.0% 8.2% 1.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0%

# 54033 47575 1900 4558 595 73 51 31 105 21 85 32 184 13

% 100% 88.0% 3.5% 8.4% 1.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.1% 0.3% 0.0%

Department of Interior - Overall FY2015Promotions By Type of Promotion - Distribution by Disability - Permanent Workforce

TotalTotal by Disability Status Detail for Targeted Disabilities

(04, 05)No

Disability

(06-94)ReportableDisability

TargetedDisability

Competitive

Non-competitive

Total Permanent Workforce (09/30/2014)

Total Promotions

Type of Promotion (21, 23, 25)Blindness

(91)PsychiatricDisability

(92)Distortion ofLimb/Spine,Dwarfism

(01)Not

Identified

(64-69)Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)Total

Paralysis

(82)Epilepsy

(16-18)Deafness

(28,30,32-38)Missing

Extremities

(90)Severe

IntellectualDisability

John W. Burden

EEO Director and Chief Diversity Officer

Alvin Dillings, Senior Policy Advisor Mark Oliver, Senior Advisor for Partnerships

Vanessa Green, Senior Policy Advisor for Appeals & Compliance Janeen Birckhead, Oversight Accountability & Compliance Manager, BIA

Leanne Kowalski – IT Specialist

Employment Compliance & Adjudication Division

Tanisha Edmonds, Equal Employment Manager

Christiania Bui, Equal Employment Specialist Pennington Winberg, Equal Employment Specialist

Thomas Ziehnert, Equal Employment Specialist Tina Hall, Records Manager

Public Civil Rights Division

Sloan Farrell, Chief Public Civil Rights Division David Quirino, Equal Employment Specialist

Michael Zimmerman, Equal Employment Specialist

Affirmative Employment Division

Acquanetta Newson, Equal Employment Specialist Kimberly Ly, Social Science Research Analyst

Barbara Evans, Program Specialist

Office of the Secretary Complaints Office

Melba Vaughn – OS Complaints Manager Joyce Corley, Equal Employment Specialist

Sherilyn Rogers O’Gorman, Equal Employment Specialist

Office of Civil Rights Organization Chart

All male female male female male female male female male female male female male female male female

# 70443 42125 28318 2298 1714 32538 18872 1711 1850 834 797 342 199 4309 4811 93 75

% 100% 59.8% 40.2% 3.3% 2.4% 46.2% 26.8% 2.4% 2.6% 1.2% 1.1% 0.5% 0.3% 6.1% 6.8% 0.1% 0.1%

# 70167 42064 28103 2234 1671 32637 18881 1662 1770 809 798 314 171 4317 4739 91 73

% 100% 59.9% 40.1% 3.2% 2.4% 46.5% 26.9% 2.4% 2.5% 1.2% 1.1% 0.4% 0.2% 6.2% 6.8% 0.1% 0.1%

All Occupations CLF % 100% 51.9% 48.1% 5.2% 4.8% 38.3% 34.0% 5.5% 6.5% 2.0% 1.9% 0.1% 0.1% 0.6% 0.5% 0.3% 0.3%

Organizational CLF % 100% 55.8% 44.2% 4.2% 3.6% 43.8% 32.7% 4.3% 4.6% 2.5% 2.4% 0.1% 0.1% 0.7% 0.5% 0.3% 0.3%

Difference # -276 -61 -215 -64 -43 99 9 -49 -80 -25 1 -28 -28 8 -72 -2 -2

Ratio Change%

- 0.1% -0.1% -0.1% -0.1% 0.3% 0.1% -0.1% -0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -0.1% 0.0% 0.0%

Net Change %

-0.4% -0.1% -0.8% -2.8% -2.5% 0.3% 0.0% -2.9% -4.3% -3.0% 0.1% -8.2% -14.1% 0.2% -1.5% -2.2% -2.7%

# 54033 32516 21517 1853 1473 25247 14713 1459 1729 686 677 189 108 3011 2758 71 59

% 100% 60.2% 39.8% 3.4% 2.7% 46.7% 27.2% 2.7% 3.2% 1.3% 1.3% 0.3% 0.2% 5.6% 5.1% 0.1% 0.1%

# 53732 32398 21334 1838 1450 25144 14563 1466 1661 679 693 185 106 3008 2801 78 60

% 100% 60.3% 39.7% 3.4% 2.7% 46.8% 27.1% 2.7% 3.1% 1.3% 1.3% 0.3% 0.2% 5.6% 5.2% 0.1% 0.1%

Difference # -301 -118 -183 -15 -23 -103 -150 7 -68 -7 16 -4 -2 -3 43 7 1

Ratio Change % - 0.1% -0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% -0.1% 0.0% -0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0%

Net Change % -0.6% -0.4% -0.9% -0.8% -1.6% -0.4% -1.0% 0.5% -3.9% -1.0% 2.4% -2.1% -1.9% -0.1% 1.6% 9.9% 1.7%

# 16410 9609 6801 445 241 7291 4159 252 121 148 120 153 91 1298 2053 22 16

% 100% 58.6% 41.4% 2.7% 1.5% 44.4% 25.3% 1.5% 0.7% 0.9% 0.7% 0.9% 0.6% 7.9% 12.5% 0.1% 0.1%

# 16435 9666 6769 396 221 7493 4318 196 109 130 105 129 65 1309 1938 13 13

% 100% 58.8% 41.2% 2.4% 1.3% 45.6% 26.3% 1.2% 0.7% 0.8% 0.6% 0.8% 0.4% 8.0% 11.8% 0.1% 0.1%

Difference # 25 57 -32 -49 -20 202 159 -56 -12 -18 -15 -24 -26 11 -115 -9 -3

Ratio Change % - 0.3% -0.3% -0.3% -0.1% 1.2% 0.9% -0.3% -0.1% -0.1% -0.1% -0.1% -0.2% 0.1% -0.7% -0.1% 0.0%

Net Change % 0.2% 0.6% -0.5% -11.0% -8.3% 2.8% 3.8% -22.2% -9.9% -12.2% -12.5% -15.7% -28.6% 0.8% -5.6% -40.9% -18.8%

Prior FY

Asian

American

Indian or

Alaska Native

Current FY

Prior FY

Current FY

Temporary Workforce

Two or more

races

Total Workforce

Permanent Workforce

Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

Current FY

Prior FY

Department of Interior - Overall FY2015

Table A1: TOTAL WORKFORCE - Distribution by Race/Ethnicity and Sex

Employment Tenure

TOTAL

WORKFORCE

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino

Non- Hispanic or Latino

WhiteBlack or African

American


Asian

American

Indian or

Alaska Native

Two or more

races

Total Workforce

Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander


Table A1: TOTAL WORKFORCE - Distribution by Race/Ethnicity and Sex

Employment Tenure

TOTAL

WORKFORCE

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino



American

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Difference # 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ratio Change % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Net Change % - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

All Occupations CLF is based on all workers in all Census Occupation groups.

Organizational CLF is based on the number of incumbants in each occupation in the organization.

Prior FY

Current FY

Non-Appropriated Workforce


# 53732 32398 21334 1838 1450 25144 14563 1466 1661 679 693 185 106 3008 2801 78 60

% 100% 60.3% 39.7% 3.4% 2.7% 46.8% 27.1% 2.7% 3.1% 1.3% 1.3% 0.3% 0.2% 5.6% 5.2% 0.1% 0.1%



# 4156 1794 2362 99 215 1215 1227 182 341 64 120 14 18 211 434 9 7

% 100% 43.2% 56.8% 2.4% 5.2% 29.2% 29.5% 4.4% 8.2% 1.5% 2.9% 0.3% 0.4% 5.1% 10.4% 0.2% 0.2%

# 8746 5566 3180 425 279 4722 2543 127 176 93 65 30 9 164 103 5 5

% 100% 63.6% 36.4% 4.9% 3.2% 54.0% 29.1% 1.5% 2.0% 1.1% 0.7% 0.3% 0.1% 1.9% 1.2% 0.1% 0.1%

# 4095 2242 1853 63 35 277 65 12 18 10 6 15 8 1862 1716 3 5

% 100% 54.7% 45.3% 1.5% 0.9% 6.8% 1.6% 0.3% 0.4% 0.2% 0.1% 0.4% 0.2% 45.5% 41.9% 0.1% 0.1%

# 373 167 206 2 3 16 9 149 194

% 100% 44.8% 55.2% 0.5% 0.8% 4.3% 2.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 39.9% 52.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 5015 3366 1649 290 185 2722 1241 101 79 113 76 19 9 106 49 15 10

% 100% 67.1% 32.9% 5.8% 3.7% 54.3% 24.7% 2.0% 1.6% 2.3% 1.5% 0.4% 0.2% 2.1% 1.0% 0.3% 0.2%

# 6814 4299 2515 141 131 3862 2047 110 167 115 126 14 6 52 34 5 4

% 100% 63.1% 36.9% 2.1% 1.9% 56.7% 30.0% 1.6% 2.5% 1.7% 1.8% 0.2% 0.1% 0.8% 0.5% 0.1% 0.1%

# 14919 9288 5631 518 336 7559 4410 696 495 143 171 71 36 278 168 23 15

% 100% 62.3% 37.7% 3.5% 2.3% 50.7% 29.6% 4.7% 3.3% 1.0% 1.1% 0.5% 0.2% 1.9% 1.1% 0.2% 0.1%

# 7827 4651 3176 269 234 3946 2496 149 223 86 101 13 17 172 94 16 11

% 100% 59.4% 40.6% 3.4% 3.0% 50.4% 31.9% 1.9% 2.8% 1.1% 1.3% 0.2% 0.2% 2.2% 1.2% 0.2% 0.1%

# 411 229 182 10 16 186 108 19 46 4 8 3 1 7 3

% 100% 55.7% 44.3% 2.4% 3.9% 45.3% 26.3% 4.6% 11.2% 1.0% 1.9% 0.7% 0.2% 1.7% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0%

# 814 498 316 13 13 396 201 50 82 30 14 4 1 4 3 1 2

% 100% 61.2% 38.8% 1.6% 1.6% 48.6% 24.7% 6.1% 10.1% 3.7% 1.7% 0.5% 0.1% 0.5% 0.4% 0.1% 0.2%

Bureau of Indian

Education

Bureau of

Reclamation

Bureau of Safety &

Environmental

Enforcement

U.S. Geological

Survey

National Park

Service

Fish & Wildlife

Service

Office of Surface

Mining, Reclamation

& Enforcement

Black or African

American

American

Indian or

Alaska Native

Two or more

races

Total

Office of the

Secretary of the

Interior

Asian

Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

Bureau of Land

Management

Bureau of Indian

Affairs

Department of Interior - Overall as of September 30, 2015

Table A2: PERMANENT WORKFORCE BY COMPONENT - Distribution by Race/Ethnicity and Sex

Organizational

Component

TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino


White


Black or African

American

American

Indian or

Alaska Native

Two or more

races

Total

Asian

Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander


Table A2: PERMANENT WORKFORCE BY COMPONENT - Distribution by Race/Ethnicity and Sex

Organizational

Component

TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino


White

# 562 298 264 8 3 243 216 20 34 21 6 2 1 3 3 1 1

% 100% 53.0% 47.0% 1.4% 0.5% 43.2% 38.4% 3.6% 6.0% 3.7% 1.1% 0.4% 0.2% 0.5% 0.5% 0.2% 0.2%

Bureau of Ocean

Energy Management


Organizational CLF is based on the number of incumbents in each occupation in the organization.


1. Officials and Managers

# 1310 856 454 36 18 672 324 43 40 14 18 2 88 53 1 1

% 100% 65.3% 34.7% 2.7% 1.4% 51.3% 24.7% 3.3% 3.1% 1.1% 1.4% 0.2% 0.0% 6.7% 4.0% 0.1% 0.1%

# 4296 2775 1521 140 80 2228 1111 92 95 46 48 6 5 257 182 6

% 100% 64.6% 35.4% 3.3% 1.9% 51.9% 25.9% 2.1% 2.2% 1.1% 1.1% 0.1% 0.1% 6.0% 4.2% 0.1% 0.0%

# 4381 3226 1155 193 63 2554 854 103 58 22 20 22 10 325 150 7

% 100% 73.6% 26.4% 4.4% 1.4% 58.3% 19.5% 2.4% 1.3% 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.2% 7.4% 3.4% 0.2% 0.0%

# 8420 3415 5005 226 426 2485 3031 261 560 82 169 26 31 323 766 12 22

% 100% 40.6% 59.4% 2.7% 5.1% 29.5% 36.0% 3.1% 6.7% 1.0% 2.0% 0.3% 0.4% 3.8% 9.1% 0.1% 0.3%

# 18407 10272 8135 595 587 7939 5320 499 753 164 255 56 46 993 1151 26 23

% 100% 55.8% 44.2% 3.2% 3.2% 43.1% 28.9% 2.7% 4.1% 0.9% 1.4% 0.3% 0.2% 5.4% 6.3% 0.1% 0.1%

# 16910 10325 6585 487 366 8707 5202 302 334 317 279 30 21 457 368 25 15

% 100% 61.1% 38.9% 2.9% 2.2% 51.5% 30.8% 1.8% 2.0% 1.9% 1.6% 0.2% 0.1% 2.7% 2.2% 0.1% 0.1%

# 3725 2996 729 178 44 2234 554 53 28 44 14 32 4 449 84 6 1

% 100% 80.4% 19.6% 4.8% 1.2% 60.0% 14.9% 1.4% 0.8% 1.2% 0.4% 0.9% 0.1% 12.1% 2.3% 0.2% 0.0%

# 5 1 4 1 4

% 100% 20.0% 80.0% 0.0% 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 5616 1284 4332 101 363 834 2379 131 438 57 101 7 27 148 1006 6 18

% 100% 22.9% 77.1% 1.8% 6.5% 14.9% 42.4% 2.3% 7.8% 1.0% 1.8% 0.1% 0.5% 2.6% 17.9% 0.1% 0.3%

# 3722 3584 138 235 14 2679 99 218 11 29 4 22 395 9 6 1

% 100% 96.3% 3.7% 6.3% 0.4% 72.0% 2.7% 5.9% 0.3% 0.8% 0.1% 0.6% 0.0% 10.6% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0%

# 456 414 42 24 3 286 30 34 4 4 62 8 1

% 100% 90.8% 9.2% 5.3% 0.7% 62.7% 6.6% 7.5% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 13.6% 1.8% 0.0% 0.2%

# 468 415 53 39 3 191 34 69 8 5 13 98 8

% 100% 88.7% 11.3% 8.3% 0.6% 40.8% 7.3% 14.7% 1.7% 1.1% 0.0% 2.8% 0.0% 20.9% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0%

# 3980 2778 1202 157 62 2020 866 144 76 55 34 21 8 372 155 9 1

% 100% 69.8% 30.2% 3.9% 1.6% 50.8% 21.8% 3.6% 1.9% 1.4% 0.9% 0.5% 0.2% 9.3% 3.9% 0.2% 0.0%

Officials and Managers -

TOTAL

2. Professionals

7. Operatives

8. Laborers and Helpers

9. Service Workers

3. Technicians

4. Sales Workers

5. Administrative Support

Workers

6. Craft Workers

American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

races

Executive/Senior Level

(Grades 15 and Above)

Mid-level (Grades 13-14)

Asian

Native

Hawaiian or

Other Pacific

Islander

First-Level (Grades 12 and

Below)

- Other


Table A3-1: OCCUPATIONAL CATEGORIES - Distribution by Race/Ethnicity and Sex - Permanent Workforce

Occupational

Categories

TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino



American



# 1310 856 454 36 18 672 324 43 40 14 18 2 88 53 1 1

% 2.4% 2.6% 2.1% 2.0% 1.2% 2.7% 2.2% 2.9% 2.4% 2.1% 2.6% 1.1% 0.0% 2.9% 1.9% 1.3% 1.7%

# 4296 2775 1521 140 80 2228 1111 92 95 46 48 6 5 257 182 6

% 8.0% 8.6% 7.1% 7.6% 5.5% 8.9% 7.6% 6.3% 5.7% 6.8% 6.9% 3.2% 4.7% 8.5% 6.5% 7.7% 0.0%

# 4381 3226 1155 193 63 2554 854 103 58 22 20 22 10 325 150 7

% 8.2% 10.0% 5.4% 10.5% 4.3% 10.2% 5.9% 7.0% 3.5% 3.2% 2.9% 11.9% 9.4% 10.8% 5.4% 9.0% 0.0%

# 8420 3415 5005 226 426 2485 3031 261 560 82 169 26 31 323 766 12 22

% 15.7% 10.5% 23.5% 12.3% 29.4% 9.9% 20.8% 17.8% 33.7% 12.1% 24.4% 14.1% 29.2% 10.7% 27.3% 15.4% 36.7%

# 18407 10272 8135 595 587 7939 5320 499 753 164 255 56 46 993 1151 26 23

% 34.3% 31.7% 38.1% 32.4% 40.5% 31.6% 36.5% 34.0% 45.3% 24.2% 36.8% 30.3% 43.4% 33.0% 41.1% 33.3% 38.3%

# 16910 10325 6585 487 366 8707 5202 302 334 317 279 30 21 457 368 25 15

% 31.5% 31.9% 30.9% 26.5% 25.2% 34.6% 35.7% 20.6% 20.1% 46.7% 40.3% 16.2% 19.8% 15.2% 13.1% 32.1% 25.0%

# 3725 2996 729 178 44 2234 554 53 28 44 14 32 4 449 84 6 1

% 6.9% 9.2% 3.4% 9.7% 3.0% 8.9% 3.8% 3.6% 1.7% 6.5% 2.0% 17.3% 3.8% 14.9% 3.0% 7.7% 1.7%

# 5 1 4 1 4

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0%

# 5616 1284 4332 101 363 834 2379 131 438 57 101 7 27 148 1006 6 18

% 10.5% 4.0% 20.3% 5.5% 25.0% 3.3% 16.3% 8.9% 26.4% 8.4% 14.6% 3.8% 25.5% 4.9% 35.9% 7.7% 30.0%

# 3722 3584 138 235 14 2679 99 218 11 29 4 22 395 9 6 1

% 6.9% 11.1% 0.6% 12.8% 1.0% 10.7% 0.7% 14.9% 0.7% 4.3% 0.6% 11.9% 0.0% 13.1% 0.3% 7.7% 1.7%

# 456 414 42 24 3 286 30 34 4 4 62 8 1

% 0.8% 1.3% 0.2% 1.3% 0.2% 1.1% 0.2% 2.3% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 2.2% 0.0% 2.1% 0.3% 0.0% 1.7%

# 468 415 53 39 3 191 34 69 8 5 13 98 8

% 0.9% 1.3% 0.2% 2.1% 0.2% 0.8% 0.2% 4.7% 0.5% 0.7% 0.0% 7.0% 0.0% 3.3% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0%

# 3980 2778 1202 157 62 2020 866 144 76 55 34 21 8 372 155 9 1

% 7.4% 8.6% 5.6% 8.5% 4.3% 8.0% 5.9% 9.8% 4.6% 8.1% 4.9% 11.4% 7.5% 12.4% 5.5% 11.5% 1.7%

# 53732 32398 21334 1838 1450 25144 14563 1466 1661 679 693 185 106 3008 2801 78 60

% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%


Table A3-2: OCCUPATIONAL CATEGORIES - Distribution by Race/Ethnicity and Sex - Permanent Workforce

Occupational

Categories

TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino



AmericanAsian

Native

Hawaiian or

Other Pacific

Islander


Below)

- Other


TOTAL

2. Professionals

American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

races




Permanent Workforce

7. Operatives


9. Service Workers

3. Technicians

4. Sales Workers


Workers

6. Craft Workers


# 3 1 2 1 1 1

% 100% 33.3% 66.7% 0.0% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 26 17 9 1 13 5 2 1 2 2

% 100% 65.4% 34.6% 0.0% 3.8% 50.0% 19.2% 7.7% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.7% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0%

# 145 83 62 3 4 42 39 3 4 4 1 1 28 13 2 1

% 100% 57.2% 42.8% 2.1% 2.8% 29.0% 26.9% 2.1% 2.8% 2.8% 0.7% 0.7% 0.0% 19.3% 9.0% 1.4% 0.7%

# 512 261 251 20 19 132 130 12 19 5 8 4 88 74 1

% 100% 51.0% 49.0% 3.9% 3.7% 25.8% 25.4% 2.3% 3.7% 1.0% 1.6% 0.8% 0.0% 17.2% 14.5% 0.0% 0.2%

# 2302 1113 1189 82 85 700 665 69 78 25 26 10 10 221 319 6 6

% 100% 48.3% 51.7% 3.6% 3.7% 30.4% 28.9% 3.0% 3.4% 1.1% 1.1% 0.4% 0.4% 9.6% 13.9% 0.3% 0.3%

# 1850 807 1043 56 73 537 630 37 76 13 26 10 13 153 221 1 4

% 100% 43.6% 56.4% 3.0% 3.9% 29.0% 34.1% 2.0% 4.1% 0.7% 1.4% 0.5% 0.7% 8.3% 11.9% 0.1% 0.2%

# 4359 1918 2441 138 210 1365 1450 78 217 47 61 19 18 266 476 5 9

% 100% 44.0% 56.0% 3.2% 4.8% 31.3% 33.3% 1.8% 5.0% 1.1% 1.4% 0.4% 0.4% 6.1% 10.9% 0.1% 0.2%

# 1097 564 533 27 44 396 300 21 56 5 10 6 108 122 1 1

% 100% 51.4% 48.6% 2.5% 4.0% 36.1% 27.3% 1.9% 5.1% 0.5% 0.9% 0.5% 0.0% 9.8% 11.1% 0.1% 0.1%

# 6109 3417 2692 189 189 2698 1868 140 218 85 76 15 9 283 328 7 4

% 100% 55.9% 44.1% 3.1% 3.1% 44.2% 30.6% 2.3% 3.6% 1.4% 1.2% 0.2% 0.1% 4.6% 5.4% 0.1% 0.1%

# 169 86 83 11 5 64 48 2 19 1 2 7 9 1

% 100% 50.9% 49.1% 6.5% 3.0% 37.9% 28.4% 1.2% 11.2% 0.6% 1.2% 0.0% 0.0% 4.1% 5.3% 0.6% 0.0%

# 8849 5030 3819 336 280 4084 2797 163 218 87 114 26 23 321 377 13 10

% 100% 56.8% 43.2% 3.8% 3.2% 46.2% 31.6% 1.8% 2.5% 1.0% 1.3% 0.3% 0.3% 3.6% 4.3% 0.1% 0.1%

# 9431 5471 3960 274 257 4457 2897 186 298 135 162 26 17 377 316 16 13

% 100% 58.0% 42.0% 2.9% 2.7% 47.3% 30.7% 2.0% 3.2% 1.4% 1.7% 0.3% 0.2% 4.0% 3.4% 0.2% 0.1%

# 7077 4279 2798 204 161 3524 2009 167 234 118 108 10 14 249 266 7 6

% 100% 60.5% 39.5% 2.9% 2.3% 49.8% 28.4% 2.4% 3.3% 1.7% 1.5% 0.1% 0.2% 3.5% 3.8% 0.1% 0.1%

# 3661 2277 1384 80 66 1864 989 87 126 64 61 8 1 170 139 4 2

% 100% 62.2% 37.8% 2.2% 1.8% 50.9% 27.0% 2.4% 3.4% 1.7% 1.7% 0.2% 0.0% 4.6% 3.8% 0.1% 0.1%

# 1560 1042 518 34 16 871 382 38 42 20 22 1 76 55 2 1

% 100% 66.8% 33.2% 2.2% 1.0% 55.8% 24.5% 2.4% 2.7% 1.3% 1.4% 0.1% 0.0% 4.9% 3.5% 0.1% 0.1%

# 791 661 130 41 10 503 70 76 22 20 10 1 16 18 4

% 100% 83.6% 16.4% 5.2% 1.3% 63.6% 8.8% 9.6% 2.8% 2.5% 1.3% 0.1% 0.0% 2.0% 2.3% 0.5% 0.0%

# 251 159 92 8 6 110 66 13 6 2 2 1 25 12

% 100% 63.3% 36.7% 3.2% 2.4% 43.8% 26.3% 5.2% 2.4% 0.8% 0.8% 0.4% 0.0% 10.0% 4.8% 0.0% 0.0%Senior Executive Service

GS-11

GS-12

GS-13

GS-14

GS-07

GS-08

GS-15

All other (unspecified

GS)

GS-09

GS-10

American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

races

GS-01

GS-02

GS-03

GS-04

GS-05

GS-06


Table A4-1: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR GENERAL SCHEDULE GRADES by Race/Ethnicity and Sex - Permanent Workforce

GS/GL/GM, SES, AND

RELATED GRADES

TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino



AmericanAsian

Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander


# 105 45 60 1 2 13 23 3 1 27 34 1

% 100% 42.9% 57.1% 1.0% 1.9% 12.4% 21.9% 2.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 25.7% 32.4% 0.0% 1.0%

# 214 74 140 6 5 47 47 1 2 1 1 20 84

% 100% 34.6% 65.4% 2.8% 2.3% 22.0% 22.0% 0.5% 0.9% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.5% 9.3% 39.3% 0.0% 0.0%

# 877 575 302 30 16 434 207 18 13 13 6 9 3 70 57 1

% 100% 65.6% 34.4% 3.4% 1.8% 49.5% 23.6% 2.1% 1.5% 1.5% 0.7% 1.0% 0.3% 8.0% 6.5% 0.1% 0.0%

# 2177 1287 890 91 42 1064 750 22 27 21 16 25 11 62 39 2 5

% 100% 59.1% 40.9% 4.2% 1.9% 48.9% 34.5% 1.0% 1.2% 1.0% 0.7% 1.1% 0.5% 2.8% 1.8% 0.1% 0.2%

# 3579 2018 1561 72 50 1788 1379 34 31 35 27 30 18 57 52 2 4

% 100% 56.4% 43.6% 2.0% 1.4% 50.0% 38.5% 0.9% 0.9% 1.0% 0.8% 0.8% 0.5% 1.6% 1.5% 0.1% 0.1%

# 543 309 234 8 8 277 193 2 3 2 4 4 2 16 24

% 100% 56.9% 43.1% 1.5% 1.5% 51.0% 35.5% 0.4% 0.6% 0.4% 0.7% 0.7% 0.4% 2.9% 4.4% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1308 765 543 23 23 695 479 9 4 14 17 5 6 18 13 1 1

% 100% 58.5% 41.5% 1.8% 1.8% 53.1% 36.6% 0.7% 0.3% 1.1% 1.3% 0.4% 0.5% 1.4% 1.0% 0.1% 0.1%

# 49 32 17 28 11 1 1 3 5

% 100% 65.3% 34.7% 0.0% 0.0% 57.1% 22.4% 2.0% 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.1% 10.2% 0.0% 0.0%

# 662 346 316 14 13 308 270 4 7 7 7 1 2 12 17

% 100% 52.3% 47.7% 2.1% 2.0% 46.5% 40.8% 0.6% 1.1% 1.1% 1.1% 0.2% 0.3% 1.8% 2.6% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1 1 1

% 100% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 448 229 219 4 7 214 184 1 5 6 5 3 3 1 14 1

% 100% 51.1% 48.9% 0.9% 1.6% 47.8% 41.1% 0.2% 1.1% 1.3% 1.1% 0.7% 0.7% 0.2% 3.1% 0.0% 0.2%

# 333 194 139 2 4 183 124 2 2 3 7 3 1 1 1

% 100% 58.3% 41.7% 0.6% 1.2% 55.0% 37.2% 0.6% 0.6% 0.9% 2.1% 0.9% 0.0% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3%

# 115 68 47 1 59 41 1 1 1 2 6 3

% 100% 59.1% 40.9% 0.9% 0.0% 51.3% 35.7% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0% 5.2% 2.6% 0.0% 0.0%

# 123 70 53 6 1 60 40 2 4 1 2 1 1 5

% 100% 56.9% 43.1% 4.9% 0.8% 48.8% 32.5% 1.6% 3.3% 0.8% 1.6% 0.0% 0.8% 0.8% 4.1% 0.0% 0.0%

# 43 28 15 2 1 19 10 2 1 2 1 1 3 1

% 100% 65.1% 34.9% 4.7% 2.3% 44.2% 23.3% 4.7% 2.3% 4.7% 2.3% 0.0% 2.3% 7.0% 2.3% 0.0% 0.0%

# 2110 549 1561 17 31 121 190 5 2 5 4 4 8 397 1326

% 100% 26.0% 74.0% 0.8% 1.5% 5.7% 9.0% 0.2% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.4% 18.8% 62.8% 0.0% 0.0%

# 15 9 6 2 4 3 1 3 2

% 100% 60.0% 40.0% 13.3% 0.0% 26.7% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.7% 20.0% 13.3% 0.0% 0.0%

GS-01

GS-02


American


Table A4-1: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR GENERAL SCHEDULE GRADES by Race/Ethnicity and Sex - Temporary Workforce

GS/GL/GM, SES, AND

RELATED GRADES

TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino


American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

racesAsian

Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

GS-09

GS-10

GS-03

GS-04

GS-05

GS-06

GS-07

GS-08

GS-15


GS)

Senior Executive Service

GS-11

GS-12

GS-13

GS-14


# 3 1 2 1 1 1

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 26 17 9 1 13 5 2 1 2 2

% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0%

# 145 83 62 3 4 42 39 3 4 4 1 1 28 13 2 1

% 0.3% 0.3% 0.3% 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% 0.3% 0.3% 0.2% 0.6% 0.1% 0.7% 0.0% 1.2% 0.5% 2.9% 1.7%

# 512 261 251 20 19 132 130 12 19 5 8 4 88 74 1

% 1.1% 1.0% 1.2% 1.3% 1.3% 0.6% 0.9% 1.1% 1.2% 0.8% 1.2% 2.9% 0.0% 3.7% 2.7% 0.0% 1.7%

# 2302 1113 1189 82 85 700 665 69 78 25 26 10 10 221 319 6 6

% 4.8% 4.1% 5.7% 5.5% 6.0% 3.3% 4.6% 6.3% 4.8% 4.0% 3.8% 7.2% 9.5% 9.2% 11.6% 8.7% 10.3%

# 1850 807 1043 56 73 537 630 37 76 13 26 10 13 153 221 1 4

% 3.8% 3.0% 5.0% 3.7% 5.1% 2.5% 4.4% 3.4% 4.7% 2.1% 3.8% 7.2% 12.4% 6.4% 8.0% 1.4% 6.9%

# 4359 1918 2441 138 210 1365 1450 78 217 47 61 19 18 266 476 5 9

% 9.0% 7.1% 11.6% 9.2% 14.7% 6.4% 10.1% 7.1% 13.3% 7.4% 8.9% 13.8% 17.1% 11.1% 17.3% 7.2% 15.5%

# 1097 564 533 27 44 396 300 21 56 5 10 6 108 122 1 1

% 2.3% 2.1% 2.5% 1.8% 3.1% 1.9% 2.1% 1.9% 3.4% 0.8% 1.5% 4.3% 0.0% 4.5% 4.4% 1.4% 1.7%

# 6109 3417 2692 189 189 2698 1868 140 218 85 76 15 9 283 328 7 4

% 12.7% 12.6% 12.8% 12.6% 13.2% 12.6% 13.0% 12.8% 13.3% 13.5% 11.0% 10.9% 8.6% 11.8% 11.9% 10.1% 6.9%

# 169 86 83 11 5 64 48 2 19 1 2 7 9 1

% 0.4% 0.3% 0.4% 0.7% 0.4% 0.3% 0.3% 0.2% 1.2% 0.2% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.3% 1.4% 0.0%

# 8849 5030 3819 336 280 4084 2797 163 218 87 114 26 23 321 377 13 10

% 18.4% 18.5% 18.2% 22.4% 19.6% 19.1% 19.5% 14.9% 13.3% 13.8% 16.5% 18.8% 21.9% 13.4% 13.7% 18.8% 17.2%

# 9431 5471 3960 274 257 4457 2897 186 298 135 162 26 17 377 316 16 13

% 19.6% 20.1% 18.9% 18.2% 18.0% 20.9% 20.2% 17.0% 18.2% 21.4% 23.5% 18.8% 16.2% 15.8% 11.5% 23.2% 22.4%

# 7077 4279 2798 204 161 3524 2009 167 234 118 108 10 14 249 266 7 6

% 14.7% 15.7% 13.3% 13.6% 11.3% 16.5% 14.0% 15.3% 14.3% 18.7% 15.7% 7.2% 13.3% 10.4% 9.7% 10.1% 10.3%

# 3661 2277 1384 80 66 1864 989 87 126 64 61 8 1 170 139 4 2

% 7.6% 8.4% 6.6% 5.3% 4.6% 8.7% 6.9% 8.0% 7.7% 10.1% 8.9% 5.8% 1.0% 7.1% 5.1% 5.8% 3.4%

# 1560 1042 518 34 16 871 382 38 42 20 22 1 76 55 2 1

% 3.2% 3.8% 2.5% 2.3% 1.1% 4.1% 2.7% 3.5% 2.6% 3.2% 3.2% 0.7% 0.0% 3.2% 2.0% 2.9% 1.7%

# 791 661 130 41 10 503 70 76 22 20 10 1 16 18 4

% 1.6% 2.4% 0.6% 2.7% 0.7% 2.4% 0.5% 6.9% 1.3% 3.2% 1.5% 0.7% 0.0% 0.7% 0.7% 5.8% 0.0%

# 251 159 92 8 6 110 66 13 6 2 2 1 25 12

% 0.5% 0.6% 0.4% 0.5% 0.4% 0.5% 0.5% 1.2% 0.4% 0.3% 0.3% 0.7% 0.0% 1.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0%

# 48192 27186 21006 1503 1427 21361 14346 1094 1634 631 689 138 105 2390 2747 69 58

% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

NOTE: Percentages computed down columns and NOT across rows.

TOTAL

GS-07

GS-08

GS-09

GS-10



Table A4-2: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR GENERAL SCHEDULE GRADES by Race/Ethnicity and Sex - Permanent Workforce

GS/GL/GM, SES, AND

RELATED GRADES

TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino

GS-11

AsianTwo or more

races



American

GS-12

GS-13

GS-14

GS-03

GS-04


GS)

GS-05

GS-06

GS-02

GS-15

American Indian

or Alaska Native

GS-01

Native

Hawaiian or

Other Pacific

Islander


# 105 45 60 1 2 13 23 3 1 27 34 1

% 0.8% 0.7% 1.0% 0.4% 1.0% 0.2% 0.6% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.2% 0.0% 3.9% 2.0% 0.0% 7.7%

# 214 74 140 6 5 47 47 1 2 1 1 20 84

% 1.7% 1.1% 2.3% 2.2% 2.5% 0.9% 1.2% 0.9% 1.9% 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 1.8% 2.9% 5.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 877 575 302 30 16 434 207 18 13 13 6 9 3 70 57 1

% 6.9% 8.7% 4.9% 10.8% 7.9% 8.2% 5.2% 16.8% 12.6% 11.8% 6.1% 10.6% 5.3% 10.0% 3.4% 16.7% 0.0%

# 2177 1287 890 91 42 1064 750 22 27 21 16 25 11 62 39 2 5

% 17.1% 19.5% 14.6% 32.6% 20.7% 20.0% 19.0% 20.6% 26.2% 19.1% 16.2% 29.4% 19.3% 8.9% 2.3% 33.3% 38.5%

# 3579 2018 1561 72 50 1788 1379 34 31 35 27 30 18 57 52 2 4

% 28.2% 30.6% 25.6% 25.8% 24.6% 33.6% 34.9% 31.8% 30.1% 31.8% 27.3% 35.3% 31.6% 8.2% 3.1% 33.3% 30.8%

# 543 309 234 8 8 277 193 2 3 2 4 4 2 16 24

% 4.3% 4.7% 3.8% 2.9% 3.9% 5.2% 4.9% 1.9% 2.9% 1.8% 4.0% 4.7% 3.5% 2.3% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1308 765 543 23 23 695 479 9 4 14 17 5 6 18 13 1 1

% 10.3% 11.6% 8.9% 8.2% 11.3% 13.1% 12.1% 8.4% 3.9% 12.7% 17.2% 5.9% 10.5% 2.6% 0.8% 16.7% 7.7%

# 49 32 17 28 11 1 1 3 5

% 0.4% 0.5% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.3% 0.9% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0%

# 662 346 316 14 13 308 270 4 7 7 7 1 2 12 17

% 5.2% 5.2% 5.2% 5.0% 6.4% 5.8% 6.8% 3.7% 6.8% 6.4% 7.1% 1.2% 3.5% 1.7% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1 1 1

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 448 229 219 4 7 214 184 1 5 6 5 3 3 1 14 1

% 3.5% 3.5% 3.6% 1.4% 3.4% 4.0% 4.7% 0.9% 4.9% 5.5% 5.1% 3.5% 5.3% 0.1% 0.8% 0.0% 7.7%

# 333 194 139 2 4 183 124 2 2 3 7 3 1 1 1

% 2.6% 2.9% 2.3% 0.7% 2.0% 3.4% 3.1% 1.9% 1.9% 2.7% 7.1% 3.5% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 7.7%

# 115 68 47 1 59 41 1 1 1 2 6 3

% 0.9% 1.0% 0.8% 0.4% 0.0% 1.1% 1.0% 0.9% 1.0% 0.9% 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0%

# 123 70 53 6 1 60 40 2 4 1 2 1 1 5

% 1.0% 1.1% 0.9% 2.2% 0.5% 1.1% 1.0% 1.9% 3.9% 0.9% 2.0% 0.0% 1.8% 0.1% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0%

# 43 28 15 2 1 19 10 2 1 2 1 1 3 1

% 0.3% 0.4% 0.2% 0.7% 0.5% 0.4% 0.3% 1.9% 1.0% 1.8% 1.0% 0.0% 1.8% 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0%

# 2110 549 1561 17 31 121 190 5 2 5 4 4 8 397 1326

% 16.6% 8.3% 25.6% 6.1% 15.3% 2.3% 4.8% 4.7% 1.9% 4.5% 4.0% 4.7% 14.0% 57.0% 79.1% 0.0% 0.0%

# 15 9 6 2 4 3 1 3 2

% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.7% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.8% 0.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0%

# 12702 6598 6104 279 203 5314 3952 107 103 110 99 85 57 697 1677 6 13

% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%


Table A4-2: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR GENERAL SCHEDULE GRADES by Race/Ethnicity and Sex - Temporary Workforce

GS/GL/GM, SES, AND

RELATED GRADES

TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino

GS-03


GS-11

Black or African

American

American Indian

or Alaska Native

GS-13

GS-14

Native

Hawaiian or

Other Pacific

Islander

GS-01

Asian

GS-04


TOTAL

GS-05

GS-06

GS-07

White

GS-10

Two or more

races

GS-15


GS)

GS-09


GS-08

GS-02

GS-12


# 25 17 8 16 8 1

% 100% 68.0% 32.0% 0.0% 0.0% 64.0% 32.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 69 52 17 1 17 6 5 2 2 27 9

% 100% 75.4% 24.6% 1.4% 0.0% 24.6% 8.7% 7.2% 2.9% 2.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 39.1% 13.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 131 112 19 6 2 37 7 33 6 2 3 31 4

% 100% 85.5% 14.5% 4.6% 1.5% 28.2% 5.3% 25.2% 4.6% 1.5% 0.0% 2.3% 0.0% 23.7% 3.1% 0.0% 0.0%

# 90 70 20 5 1 46 13 10 1 2 2 5 5

% 100% 77.8% 22.2% 5.6% 1.1% 51.1% 14.4% 11.1% 1.1% 2.2% 0.0% 2.2% 0.0% 5.6% 5.6% 0.0% 0.0%

# 487 424 63 33 5 295 41 53 6 2 7 34 11

% 100% 87.1% 12.9% 6.8% 1.0% 60.6% 8.4% 10.9% 1.2% 0.4% 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 7.0% 2.3% 0.0% 0.0%

# 237 209 28 15 1 118 13 43 1 4 1 2 26 11 1 1

% 100% 88.2% 11.8% 6.3% 0.4% 49.8% 5.5% 18.1% 0.4% 1.7% 0.4% 0.8% 0.0% 11.0% 4.6% 0.4% 0.4%

# 525 499 26 43 2 319 17 47 2 4 1 10 1 76 3

% 100% 95.0% 5.0% 8.2% 0.4% 60.8% 3.2% 9.0% 0.4% 0.8% 0.2% 1.9% 0.2% 14.5% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0%

# 666 638 28 47 2 456 22 40 2 3 4 87 2 1

% 100% 95.8% 4.2% 7.1% 0.3% 68.5% 3.3% 6.0% 0.3% 0.5% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 13.1% 0.3% 0.2% 0.0%

# 608 584 24 26 465 21 36 7 1 2 46 2 2

% 100% 96.1% 3.9% 4.3% 0.0% 76.5% 3.5% 5.9% 0.0% 1.2% 0.2% 0.3% 0.0% 7.6% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0%

# 875 860 15 55 2 657 10 41 2 4 2 101 1

% 100% 98.3% 1.7% 6.3% 0.2% 75.1% 1.1% 4.7% 0.2% 0.5% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 11.5% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0%

# 62 61 1 4 1 54 1 1 1

% 100% 98.4% 1.6% 6.5% 1.6% 87.1% 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 9 9 7 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 77.8% 0.0% 11.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 1292 1239 53 76 5 971 43 26 1 16 1 7 141 2 2 1

% 100% 95.9% 4.1% 5.9% 0.4% 75.2% 3.3% 2.0% 0.1% 1.2% 0.1% 0.5% 0.0% 10.9% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1%

Grade-01

Grade-02


American


Table A5NS-1: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR NON-SUPERVISORY WAGE GRADES by Race/Ethnicity and Sex - Permanent Workforce

WD, WG, WL, XD, XL, & XP

TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino


American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

racesAsian

Native

Hawaiian or

Other Pacific

Islander

Grade-09

Grade-10

Grade-03

Grade-04

Grade-05

Grade-06

Grade-07

Grade-08

Grade-15

All Other Non-supervisory Wage

Grades

Grade-11

Grade-12

Grade-13

Grade-14


# 83 62 21 3 2 19 11 1 3 36 8

% 100% 74.7% 25.3% 3.6% 2.4% 22.9% 13.3% 0.0% 0.0% 1.2% 0.0% 3.6% 0.0% 43.4% 9.6% 0.0% 0.0%

# 221 182 39 2 67 30 11 2 2 2 2 98 5

% 100% 82.4% 17.6% 0.9% 0.0% 30.3% 13.6% 5.0% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 44.3% 2.3% 0.0% 0.0%

# 458 384 74 9 306 62 25 2 7 3 37 7

% 100% 83.8% 16.2% 2.0% 0.0% 66.8% 13.5% 5.5% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 1.5% 0.7% 8.1% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0%

# 263 209 54 11 2 186 48 2 2 1 1 1 6 2 1

% 100% 79.5% 20.5% 4.2% 0.8% 70.7% 18.3% 0.8% 0.0% 0.8% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 2.3% 0.8% 0.4% 0.0%

# 1052 915 137 43 6 764 121 29 1 11 2 21 3 42 4 5

% 100% 87.0% 13.0% 4.1% 0.6% 72.6% 11.5% 2.8% 0.1% 1.0% 0.2% 2.0% 0.3% 4.0% 0.4% 0.5% 0.0%

# 116 97 19 3 1 76 18 4 2 12

% 100% 83.6% 16.4% 2.6% 0.9% 65.5% 15.5% 3.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.7% 0.0% 10.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 369 338 31 15 1 294 30 4 3 21 1

% 100% 91.6% 8.4% 4.1% 0.3% 79.7% 8.1% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 5.7% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%

# 188 174 14 14 2 146 12 1 1 1 11

% 100% 92.6% 7.4% 7.4% 1.1% 77.7% 6.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 5.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 124 117 7 1 102 5 1 1 1 1 11 1

% 100% 94.4% 5.6% 0.8% 0.0% 82.3% 4.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.0% 8.9% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0%

# 67 65 2 7 56 2 1 1

% 100% 97.0% 3.0% 10.4% 0.0% 83.6% 3.0% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 2 2 2

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 780 515 265 9 3 153 26 11 1 2 3 1 337 234

% 100% 66.0% 34.0% 1.2% 0.4% 19.6% 3.3% 1.4% 0.1% 0.3% 0.0% 0.4% 0.1% 43.2% 30.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Grade-07

Grade-08

Grade-15


Grades

Grade-11

Grade-12

Grade-13

Grade-14

Grade-09

Grade-10

American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

races

Grade-01

Grade-02

Grade-03

Grade-04

Asian

Native

Hawaiian or

Other Pacific

Islander

Grade-05

Grade-06


Table A5NS-1: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR NON-SUPERVISORY WAGE GRADES by Race/Ethnicity and Sex - Temporary Workforce


TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino



American


# 25 17 8 16 8 1

% 0.5% 0.4% 2.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 69 52 17 1 17 6 5 2 2 27 9

% 1.4% 1.1% 5.6% 0.3% 0.0% 0.5% 3.0% 1.5% 8.7% 4.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.7% 18.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 131 112 19 6 2 37 7 33 6 2 3 31 4

% 2.6% 2.3% 6.3% 1.9% 9.5% 1.1% 3.5% 9.8% 26.1% 4.3% 0.0% 7.5% 0.0% 5.4% 8.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 90 70 20 5 1 46 13 10 1 2 2 5 5

% 1.8% 1.5% 6.6% 1.6% 4.8% 1.3% 6.5% 3.0% 4.3% 4.3% 0.0% 5.0% 0.0% 0.9% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 487 424 63 33 5 295 41 53 6 2 7 34 11

% 9.6% 8.9% 20.9% 10.6% 23.8% 8.5% 20.4% 15.8% 26.1% 4.3% 0.0% 17.5% 0.0% 5.9% 22.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 237 209 28 15 1 118 13 43 1 4 1 2 26 11 1 1

% 4.7% 4.4% 9.3% 4.8% 4.8% 3.4% 6.5% 12.8% 4.3% 8.5% 25.0% 5.0% 0.0% 4.5% 22.0% 16.7% 50.0%

# 525 499 26 43 2 319 17 47 2 4 1 10 1 76 3

% 10.3% 10.5% 8.6% 13.8% 9.5% 9.2% 8.5% 14.0% 8.7% 8.5% 25.0% 25.0% 100.0% 13.2% 6.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 666 638 28 47 2 456 22 40 2 3 4 87 2 1

% 13.1% 13.4% 9.3% 15.1% 9.5% 13.2% 10.9% 11.9% 8.7% 6.4% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 15.1% 4.0% 16.7% 0.0%

# 608 584 24 26 465 21 36 7 1 2 46 2 2

% 12.0% 12.2% 7.9% 8.4% 0.0% 13.4% 10.4% 10.7% 0.0% 14.9% 25.0% 5.0% 0.0% 8.0% 4.0% 33.3% 0.0%

# 875 860 15 55 2 657 10 41 2 4 2 101 1

% 17.2% 18.0% 5.0% 17.7% 9.5% 19.0% 5.0% 12.2% 8.7% 8.5% 0.0% 5.0% 0.0% 17.5% 2.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 62 61 1 4 1 54 1 1 1

% 1.2% 1.3% 0.3% 1.3% 4.8% 1.6% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 9 9 7 1 1

% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1292 1239 53 76 5 971 43 26 1 16 1 7 141 2 2 1

% 25.5% 26.0% 17.5% 24.4% 23.8% 28.1% 21.4% 7.7% 4.3% 34.0% 25.0% 17.5% 0.0% 24.5% 4.0% 33.3% 50.0%

# 5076 4774 302 311 21 3458 201 336 23 47 4 40 1 576 50 6 2

% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%



AmericanAsian

Native

Hawaiian or

Other Pacific

Islander

American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

races

Grade-01

Total Non-supervisory Wage

Grades


Table A5NS-2: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR NON-SUPERVISORY WAGE GRADES by Race/Ethnicity and Sex - Permanent Workforce


TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino

Grade-06

Grade-07

Grade-08

Grade-09

Grade-02

Grade-03

Grade-04

Grade-05

Grade-10

Grade-15


Grades

Grade-11

Grade-12

Grade-13

Grade-14


# 83 62 21 3 2 19 11 1 3 36 8

% 2.2% 2.0% 3.2% 2.6% 11.8% 0.9% 3.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.0% 0.0% 6.8% 0.0% 5.9% 3.1% 0.0% -

# 221 182 39 2 67 30 11 2 2 2 2 98 5

% 5.9% 5.9% 5.9% 1.7% 0.0% 3.1% 8.2% 12.4% 33.3% 10.0% 33.3% 4.5% 0.0% 16.0% 1.9% 0.0% -

# 458 384 74 9 306 62 25 2 7 3 37 7

% 12.3% 12.5% 11.2% 7.7% 0.0% 14.1% 17.0% 28.1% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 15.9% 37.5% 6.0% 2.7% 0.0% -

# 263 209 54 11 2 186 48 2 2 1 1 1 6 2 1

% 7.1% 6.8% 8.1% 9.4% 11.8% 8.6% 13.2% 2.2% 0.0% 10.0% 16.7% 2.3% 12.5% 1.0% 0.8% 14.3% -

# 1052 915 137 43 6 764 121 29 1 11 2 21 3 42 4 5

% 28.2% 29.9% 20.7% 36.8% 35.3% 35.2% 33.2% 32.6% 16.7% 55.0% 33.3% 47.7% 37.5% 6.9% 1.5% 71.4% -

# 116 97 19 3 1 76 18 4 2 12

% 3.1% 3.2% 2.9% 2.6% 5.9% 3.5% 4.9% 4.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.5% 0.0% 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% -

# 369 338 31 15 1 294 30 4 3 21 1

% 9.9% 11.0% 4.7% 12.8% 5.9% 13.5% 8.2% 4.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 6.8% 0.0% 3.4% 0.0% 14.3% -

# 188 174 14 14 2 146 12 1 1 1 11

% 5.0% 5.7% 2.1% 12.0% 11.8% 6.7% 3.3% 1.1% 0.0% 5.0% 0.0% 2.3% 0.0% 1.8% 0.0% 0.0% -

# 124 117 7 1 102 5 1 1 1 1 11 1

% 3.3% 3.8% 1.1% 0.9% 0.0% 4.7% 1.4% 1.1% 0.0% 5.0% 16.7% 2.3% 0.0% 1.8% 0.4% 0.0% -

# 67 65 2 7 56 2 1 1

% 1.8% 2.1% 0.3% 6.0% 0.0% 2.6% 0.5% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% -

# 1 1 1

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -

# 2 2 2

% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -

# 780 515 265 9 3 153 26 11 1 2 3 1 337 234

% 20.9% 16.8% 40.0% 7.7% 17.6% 7.0% 7.1% 12.4% 16.7% 10.0% 0.0% 6.8% 12.5% 55.1% 89.7% 0.0% -

# 3724 3061 663 117 17 2172 365 89 6 20 6 44 8 612 261 7

% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% -


Grades

Grade-11

Grade-12

Grade-13

Grade-14

Grade-04

Grade-05

Grade-06

Grade-07

Grade-10

Grade-15

Grade-02

Grade-03


Grades


Table A5NS-2: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR NON-SUPERVISORY WAGE GRADES by Race/Ethnicity and Sex - Temporary Workforce


TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino

Grade-08

Grade-09



AmericanAsian

Two or more

races

Grade-01

Native

Hawaiian or

Other Pacific

Islander

American Indian

or Alaska Native


#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 6 4 2 2 1 1 1 1

% 100% 66.7% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 16.7% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0%

# 2 2 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 11 10 1 5 1 3 1 1

% 100% 90.9% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0% 45.5% 9.1% 27.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 9.1% 0.0% 9.1% 0.0%

# 29 28 1 2 21 2 1 2 1

% 100% 96.6% 3.4% 6.9% 0.0% 72.4% 0.0% 6.9% 0.0% 3.4% 0.0% 6.9% 0.0% 0.0% 3.4% 0.0% 0.0%

# 29 22 7 17 5 3 1 1 1 1

% 100% 75.9% 24.1% 0.0% 0.0% 58.6% 17.2% 10.3% 3.4% 0.0% 0.0% 3.4% 0.0% 3.4% 3.4% 0.0% 0.0%

# 66 61 5 3 2 37 2 11 1 1 9

% 100% 92.4% 7.6% 4.5% 3.0% 56.1% 3.0% 16.7% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 1.5% 0.0% 13.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 49 47 2 2 33 2 6 6

% 100% 95.9% 4.1% 4.1% 0.0% 67.3% 4.1% 12.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 93 90 3 5 72 3 2 2 7 2

% 100% 96.8% 3.2% 5.4% 0.0% 77.4% 3.2% 2.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.2% 0.0% 7.5% 0.0% 2.2% 0.0%

# 154 150 4 10 116 2 8 1 16 1

% 100% 97.4% 2.6% 6.5% 0.0% 75.3% 1.3% 5.2% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.4% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0%

# 21 21 2 18 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 9.5% 0.0% 85.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 2 1 1 1 1

% 100% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 1 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Grade-01

Grade-02


American


Table A5S-1: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR SUPERVISORY WAGE GRADES by Race/Ethnicity and Sex - Permanent Workforce

WS & XS

TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino


American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

racesAsian

Native

Hawaiian or

Other Pacific

Islander

Grade-09

Grade-10

Grade-03

Grade-04

Grade-05

Grade-06

Grade-07

Grade-08

Grade-15

All Other Supervisory Wage

Grades

Grade-11

Grade-12

Grade-13

Grade-14


#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 1 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 4 3 1 1 3

% 100% 75.0% 25.0% 0.0% 25.0% 75.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 3 2 1 2 1

% 100% 66.7% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 1 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Grade-07

Grade-08

Grade-15


Grades

Grade-11

Grade-12

Grade-13

Grade-14

Grade-09

Grade-10

American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

races

Grade-01

Grade-02

Grade-03

Grade-04

Asian

Native

Hawaiian or

Other Pacific

Islander

Grade-05

Grade-06


Table A5S-1: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR SUPERVISORY WAGE GRADES by Race/Ethnicity and Sex - Temporary Workforce

WS & XS

TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino



American


#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -

# 6 4 2 2 1 1 1 1

% 1.3% 0.9% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 6.3% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% - 14.3% - 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% -

# 2 2 1 1

% 0.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - 2.4% 0.0% 0.0% -

# 11 10 1 5 1 3 1 1

% 2.4% 2.3% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 1.5% 6.3% 8.3% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - 2.4% 0.0% 33.3% -

# 29 28 1 2 21 2 1 2 1

% 6.3% 6.4% 3.8% 8.3% 0.0% 6.5% 0.0% 5.6% 0.0% ###### - 28.6% - 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% -

# 29 22 7 17 5 3 1 1 1 1

% 6.3% 5.0% 26.9% 0.0% 0.0% 5.2% 31.3% 8.3% 25.0% 0.0% - 14.3% - 2.4% 25.0% 0.0% -

# 66 61 5 3 2 37 2 11 1 1 9

% 14.2% 13.9% 19.2% 12.5% 100.0% 11.4% 12.5% 30.6% 25.0% 0.0% - 14.3% - 21.4% 0.0% 0.0% -

# 49 47 2 2 33 2 6 6

% 10.6% 10.7% 7.7% 8.3% 0.0% 10.2% 12.5% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% -

# 93 90 3 5 72 3 2 2 7 2

% 20.0% 20.5% 11.5% 20.8% 0.0% 22.2% 18.8% 5.6% 0.0% 0.0% - 28.6% - 16.7% 0.0% 66.7% -

# 154 150 4 10 116 2 8 1 16 1

% 33.2% 34.2% 15.4% 41.7% 0.0% 35.7% 12.5% 22.2% 25.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - 38.1% 25.0% 0.0% -

# 21 21 2 18 1

% 4.5% 4.8% 0.0% 8.3% 0.0% 5.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - 2.4% 0.0% 0.0% -

# 2 1 1 1 1

% 0.4% 0.2% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -

# 1 1 1

% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -

# 1 1 1

% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -

# 464 438 26 24 2 325 16 36 4 1 7 42 4 3

% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% - 100% 100% 100% -


Grades

Grade-11

Grade-12

Grade-13

Grade-14

Grade-04

Grade-05

Grade-06

Grade-07

Grade-10

Grade-15

Grade-02

Grade-03

Total Supervisory Wage Grades


Table A5S-2: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR SUPERVISORY WAGE GRADES by Race/Ethnicity and Sex - Permanent Workforce

WS & XS

TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino

Grade-08

Grade-09



AmericanAsian

Two or more

races

Grade-01

Native

Hawaiian or

Other Pacific

Islander

American Indian

or Alaska Native


#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - -

# 1 1 1

% 11.1% 14.3% 0.0% - 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - -

# 4 3 1 1 3

% 44.4% 42.9% 50.0% - 100.0% 42.9% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - -

# 3 2 1 2 1

% 33.3% 28.6% 50.0% - 0.0% 28.6% 100.0% - - - - - - - - - -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - -

# 1 1 1

% 11.1% 14.3% 0.0% - 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - -

# 9 7 2 1 7 1

% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% - - - - - - - - - -



AmericanAsian

Native

Hawaiian or

Other Pacific

Islander

American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

races

Grade-01

Total Supervisory Wage Grades


Table A5S-2: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR SUPERVISORY WAGE GRADES by Race/Ethnicity and Sex - Temporary Workforce

WS & XS

TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino

Grade-06

Grade-07

Grade-08

Grade-09

Grade-02

Grade-03

Grade-04

Grade-05

Grade-10

Grade-15


Grades

Grade-11

Grade-12

Grade-13

Grade-14


# 3284 2115 1169 120 59 1801 977 83 62 34 25 10 11 63 35 4

% 100% 64.4% 35.6% 3.7% 1.8% 54.8% 29.8% 2.5% 1.9% 1.0% 0.8% 0.3% 0.3% 1.9% 1.1% 0.1% 0.0%

Occupational CLF 100% 46.6% 53.4% 4.0% 4.3% 37.0% 41.2% 3.5% 5.5% 1.0% 1.2% 0.1% 0.2% 0.6% 0.6% 0.4% 0.4%

# 313 164 149 11 1 132 113 2 7 3 8 1 16 18 1

% 100% 52.4% 47.6% 3.5% 0.3% 42.2% 36.1% 0.6% 2.2% 1.0% 2.6% 0.0% 0.3% 5.1% 5.8% 0.0% 0.3%


# 88 47 41 4 1 36 20 3 10 3 2 2 7

% 100% 53.4% 46.6% 4.5% 1.1% 40.9% 22.7% 3.4% 11.4% 0.0% 3.4% 2.3% 0.0% 2.3% 8.0% 0.0% 0.0%


# 105 98 7 7 67 4 12 3 3 2 7

% 100% 93.3% 6.7% 6.7% 0.0% 63.8% 3.8% 11.4% 2.9% 2.9% 0.0% 1.9% 0.0% 6.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


# 3444 2167 1277 114 55 1889 1115 18 21 22 48 3 3 116 34 5 1

% 100% 62.9% 37.1% 3.3% 1.6% 54.8% 32.4% 0.5% 0.6% 0.6% 1.4% 0.1% 0.1% 3.4% 1.0% 0.1% 0.0%


# 886 790 96 55 4 629 82 8 8 8 1 81 9 1

% 100% 89.2% 10.8% 6.2% 0.5% 71.0% 9.3% 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 0.1% 9.1% 1.0% 0.1% 0.0%


# 922 807 115 49 2 473 63 4 2 6 2 9 266 46

% 100% 87.5% 12.5% 5.3% 0.2% 51.3% 6.8% 0.4% 0.2% 0.7% 0.2% 1.0% 0.0% 28.9% 5.0% 0.0% 0.0%


# 902 732 170 50 11 570 125 12 7 29 14 3 67 13 1

% 100% 81.2% 18.8% 5.5% 1.2% 63.2% 13.9% 1.3% 0.8% 3.2% 1.6% 0.3% 0.0% 7.4% 1.4% 0.1% 0.0%


# 210 173 37 16 3 133 27 2 7 4 17 1

% 100% 82.4% 17.6% 7.6% 1.4% 63.3% 12.9% 1.0% 3.3% 1.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8.1% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0%



Table A6: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR MAJOR OCCUPATIONS - Distribution by Race/Ethnicity and Sex - Permanent Workforce

Job Title/Series Agency

Rate Occupational CLF

TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino


American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

racesAsian

Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

Park Ranger (0025)

Environmental Protection

Specialist (0028)

Petroleum Engineering

Technician (0802)

Forestry Technician (0462)

Civil Engineering (0810)


American

Gen Natural Resources

Mgmt & Bio Sciences (0401)

Range Technician (0455)

Security Administration

(0080)

Security Guard (0085)



Table A6: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR MAJOR OCCUPATIONS - Distribution by Race/Ethnicity and Sex - Permanent Workforce



TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino


American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

racesAsian

Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

Park Ranger (0025)


American

# 295 246 49 7 3 181 35 26 8 26 1 2 4 2

% 100% 83.4% 16.6% 2.4% 1.0% 61.4% 11.9% 8.8% 2.7% 8.8% 0.3% 0.7% 0.0% 1.4% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0%


# 277 198 79 4 2 178 71 4 2 9 4 1 1 1

% 100% 71.5% 28.5% 1.4% 0.7% 64.3% 25.6% 1.4% 0.7% 3.2% 1.4% 0.4% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0%


# 1356 1009 347 23 5 948 324 8 3 19 9 1 10 6

% 100% 74.4% 25.6% 1.7% 0.4% 69.9% 23.9% 0.6% 0.2% 1.4% 0.7% 0.1% 0.0% 0.7% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0%


# 790 552 238 7 2 525 223 9 2 6 8 1 4 3

% 100% 69.9% 30.1% 0.9% 0.3% 66.5% 28.2% 1.1% 0.3% 0.8% 1.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.5% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0%


# 781 643 138 49 14 528 97 27 10 13 6 3 23 10 1

% 100% 82.3% 17.7% 6.3% 1.8% 67.6% 12.4% 3.5% 1.3% 1.7% 0.8% 0.4% 0.0% 2.9% 1.3% 0.0% 0.1%


# 545 477 68 31 3 284 42 10 2 6 4 6 140 17

% 100% 87.5% 12.5% 5.7% 0.6% 52.1% 7.7% 1.8% 0.4% 1.1% 0.7% 1.1% 0.0% 25.7% 3.1% 0.0% 0.0%


# 183 90 93 5 4 75 75 5 6 1 1 1 3 7

% 100% 49.2% 50.8% 2.7% 2.2% 41.0% 41.0% 2.7% 3.3% 0.5% 0.0% 0.5% 0.5% 1.6% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0%


Criminal Investigating (1811)

Dispatching (2151)


(0881)

Geophysics (1313)

Hydrology (1315)

Geology (1350)

Gen Inspect, Investig,

Enforce, & Compl (1801)


# 1763 1032 731 28 14 950 683 7 4 12 7 10 11 24 9 1 3

% 100% 58.5% 41.5% 1.6% 0.8% 53.9% 38.7% 0.4% 0.2% 0.7% 0.4% 0.6% 0.6% 1.4% 0.5% 0.1% 0.2%


# 34 17 17 1 1 16 15 1

% 100% 50.0% 50.0% 2.9% 2.9% 47.1% 44.1% 0.0% 2.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


# 2 2 2

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


# 72 59 13 3 13 1 1 2 1 1 41 9

% 100% 81.9% 18.1% 4.2% 0.0% 18.1% 1.4% 1.4% 2.8% 0.0% 1.4% 1.4% 0.0% 56.9% 12.5% 0.0% 0.0%


# 236 109 127 2 4 101 112 1 2 4 2 1 1 5 1

% 100% 46.2% 53.8% 0.8% 1.7% 42.8% 47.5% 0.4% 0.0% 0.8% 1.7% 0.8% 0.4% 0.4% 2.1% 0.0% 0.4%


# 799 694 105 53 4 586 96 7 9 2 20 1 19 1 1

% 100% 86.9% 13.1% 6.6% 0.5% 73.3% 12.0% 0.9% 0.0% 1.1% 0.3% 2.5% 0.1% 2.4% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1%


# 571 496 75 53 2 321 55 4 7 12 99 18

% 100% 86.9% 13.1% 9.3% 0.4% 56.2% 9.6% 0.7% 0.0% 1.2% 0.0% 2.1% 0.0% 17.3% 3.2% 0.0% 0.0%


# 39 30 9 1 29 9

% 100% 76.9% 23.1% 2.6% 0.0% 74.4% 23.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

races


(0080)






Table A6: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR MAJOR OCCUPATIONS - Distribution by Race/Ethnicity and Sex - Temporary Workforce



TOTAL EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino



AmericanAsian

Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

Park Ranger (0025)


Specialist (0028)




Technician (0802)


American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

races


Table A6: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR MAJOR OCCUPATIONS - Distribution by Race/Ethnicity and Sex - Temporary Workforce



TOTAL EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino



AmericanAsian

Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

Park Ranger (0025)# 3 3 1 2

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


# 18 13 5 13 3 2

% 100% 72.2% 27.8% 0.0% 0.0% 72.2% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


# 95 70 25 2 2 67 21 1 1 1

% 100% 73.7% 26.3% 2.1% 2.1% 70.5% 22.1% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


# 91 49 42 1 2 47 39 1 1

% 100% 53.8% 46.2% 1.1% 2.2% 51.6% 42.9% 0.0% 0.0% 1.1% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


# 1 1 1

% 100% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


# 68 19 49 3 18 44 1 2

% 100% 27.9% 72.1% 0.0% 4.4% 26.5% 64.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% 0.0% 0.0%


Geology (1350)




Dispatching (2151)

Geophysics (1313)

Hydrology (1315)


(0881)


# 60 41 19 3 2 35 16 1 1 1 1

% 100% 68.3% 31.7% 5.0% 3.3% 58.3% 26.7% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.7% 0.0% 1.7% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0%

# 81 55 26 3 47 25 1 1 2 2

% 100% 67.9% 32.1% 3.7% 0.0% 58.0% 30.9% 1.2% 1.2% 2.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 141 96 45 6 2 82 41 2 1 2 1 3 1

% 100% 68.1% 31.9% 4.3% 1.4% 58.2% 29.1% 1.4% 0.7% 1.4% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 2.1% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0%


# 33 18 15 2 16 12 3

% 100% 54.5% 45.5% 6.1% 0.0% 48.5% 36.4% 0.0% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 21 10 11 1 7 3 3 2 5

% 100% 47.6% 52.4% 4.8% 0.0% 33.3% 14.3% 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 9.5% 23.8% 0.0% 0.0%

# 4 3 1 1 2 1

% 100% 75.0% 25.0% 25.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 25 13 12 2 9 3 3 1 2 5

% 100% 52.0% 48.0% 8.0% 0.0% 36.0% 12.0% 0.0% 12.0% 0.0% 4.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0%


# 2 1 1 1 1

% 100% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 6 5 1 4 1 1

% 100% 83.3% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1 1 1

% 100% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 7 5 2 4 1 1 1

% 100% 71.4% 28.6% 0.0% 0.0% 57.1% 0.0% 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


# 1 1 1

% 100% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

races

Accessions

From Temporary

Park Ranger (0025)

Total Hires

Security Administration (0080)

Accessions

From Temporary

Total Hires

Total Hires

From Pathways Intern

Environmental Protection Specialist (0028)

Accessions

From Temporary




Table A7-Alt: HIRES FOR MAJOR OCCUPATIONS by Race/Ethnicity and Sex - Permanent Workforce



TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino



AmericanAsian


Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

races

Park Ranger (0025)





TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino



AmericanAsian

# 11 11 7 1 3

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 63.6% 0.0% 9.1% 0.0% 27.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 5 5 1 4

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 80.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 16 16 1 11 1 3

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 6.3% 0.0% 68.8% 0.0% 6.3% 0.0% 18.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 131 66 65 2 3 58 51 1 1 5 1 5 3 1

% 100% 50.4% 49.6% 1.5% 2.3% 44.3% 38.9% 0.8% 0.8% 0.0% 3.8% 0.0% 0.8% 3.8% 2.3% 0.0% 0.8%

# 69 31 38 31 35 1 2

% 100% 44.9% 55.1% 0.0% 0.0% 44.9% 50.7% 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 2.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 200 97 103 2 3 89 86 1 2 7 1 5 3 1

% 100% 48.5% 51.5% 1.0% 1.5% 44.5% 43.0% 0.5% 1.0% 0.0% 3.5% 0.0% 0.5% 2.5% 1.5% 0.0% 0.5%


# 30 13 17 1 10 13 2 2 2

% 100% 43.3% 56.7% 3.3% 0.0% 33.3% 43.3% 0.0% 6.7% 0.0% 6.7% 0.0% 0.0% 6.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 96 84 12 4 67 10 2 2 1 8 2

% 100% 87.5% 12.5% 4.2% 0.0% 69.8% 10.4% 2.1% 0.0% 2.1% 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 8.3% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0%

# 30 26 4 1 24 3 1 1

% 100% 86.7% 13.3% 3.3% 0.0% 80.0% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.3% 3.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 126 110 16 5 91 13 2 2 1 1 9 2

% 100% 87.3% 12.7% 4.0% 0.0% 72.2% 10.3% 1.6% 0.0% 1.6% 0.0% 0.8% 0.8% 7.1% 1.6% 0.0% 0.0%


#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Total Hires

From Temporary



From Temporary

Total Hires

Accessions


General Natural Resources Management and Biological Sciences (0401)

Accessions

Accessions

Total Hires



From Temporary


Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

races

Park Ranger (0025)





TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino



AmericanAsian

# 89 83 6 5 58 5 2 18 1

% 100% 93.3% 6.7% 5.6% 0.0% 65.2% 5.6% 2.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 20.2% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0%

# 32 30 2 4 17 1 1 8 1

% 100% 93.8% 6.3% 12.5% 0.0% 53.1% 3.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.1% 0.0% 25.0% 3.1% 0.0% 0.0%

# 121 113 8 9 75 6 2 1 26 2

% 100% 93.4% 6.6% 7.4% 0.0% 62.0% 5.0% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 21.5% 1.7% 0.0% 0.0%


# 1 1 1

% 100% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 70 55 15 1 2 49 11 2 2 1 1 1

% 100% 78.6% 21.4% 1.4% 2.9% 70.0% 15.7% 2.9% 0.0% 2.9% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0%

# 8 7 1 5 1 1 1

% 100% 87.5% 12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 62.5% 12.5% 12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 78 62 16 1 2 54 12 3 2 1 2 1

% 100% 79.5% 20.5% 1.3% 2.6% 69.2% 15.4% 3.8% 0.0% 2.6% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 2.6% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0%


# 7 6 1 1 1 4 1

% 100% 85.7% 14.3% 14.3% 14.3% 57.1% 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 20 17 3 11 2 2 1 2 2

% 100% 85.0% 15.0% 0.0% 0.0% 55.0% 10.0% 10.0% 5.0% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 21 18 3 1 11 2 2 1 2 2

% 100% 85.7% 14.3% 4.8% 0.0% 52.4% 9.5% 9.5% 4.8% 9.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 9.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Total Hires

From Temporary


From Temporary



Accessions

Total Hires


Petroleum Engineering Technician (0802)

Accessions


Total Hires

Accessions

From Temporary


Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

races

Park Ranger (0025)





TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino



AmericanAsian

# 33 30 3 21 3 6 3

% 100% 90.9% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0% 63.6% 9.1% 18.2% 0.0% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 3 3 2 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 36 33 3 23 3 6 4

% 100% 91.7% 8.3% 0.0% 0.0% 63.9% 8.3% 16.7% 0.0% 11.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


# 3 3 2 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 10 4 6 4 5 1

% 100% 40.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 50.0% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 6 4 2 4 2

% 100% 66.7% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 66.7% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 16 8 8 8 7 1

% 100% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 43.8% 0.0% 6.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


# 1 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 30 24 6 24 6

% 100% 80.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 31 17 14 16 14 1

% 100% 54.8% 45.2% 0.0% 0.0% 51.6% 45.2% 3.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 61 41 20 40 20 1

% 100% 67.2% 32.8% 0.0% 0.0% 65.6% 32.8% 1.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


# 22 13 9 13 9

% 100% 59.1% 40.9% 0.0% 0.0% 59.1% 40.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Total Hires


Geophysics (1313)

Accessions

From Temporary

From Temporary


Hydrology (1315)

Total Hires

Accessions

Petroleum Engineering (0881)

From Temporary

Total Hires

Accessions



Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

races

Park Ranger (0025)





TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino



AmericanAsian

# 33 21 12 19 12 1 1

% 100% 63.6% 36.4% 0.0% 0.0% 57.6% 36.4% 3.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 11 7 4 7 4

% 100% 63.6% 36.4% 0.0% 0.0% 63.6% 36.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 44 28 16 26 16 1 1

% 100% 63.6% 36.4% 0.0% 0.0% 59.1% 36.4% 2.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


# 5 5 5

% 100% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 37 33 4 27 3 5 1 1

% 100% 89.2% 10.8% 0.0% 0.0% 73.0% 8.1% 13.5% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 38 34 4 28 3 5 1 1

% 100% 89.5% 10.5% 0.0% 0.0% 73.7% 7.9% 13.2% 2.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


# 1 1 1

% 100% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 19 17 2 2 10 2 5

% 100% 89.5% 10.5% 10.5% 0.0% 52.6% 10.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 26.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 19 17 2 2 10 2 5

% 100% 89.5% 10.5% 10.5% 0.0% 52.6% 10.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 26.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Accessions

From Temporary


Total Hires

Total Hires

From Temporary


General Inspection, Investigation, Enforcement, and Compliance Series (1801)

From Temporary

Total Hires

Accessions


Accessions

Geology (1350)


Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

races

Park Ranger (0025)





TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino



AmericanAsian

# 29 16 13 2 1 13 12 1

% 100% 55.2% 44.8% 6.9% 3.4% 44.8% 41.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 12 4 8 4 7 1

% 100% 33.3% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 58.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8.3% 0.0% 0.0%

# 41 20 21 2 1 17 19 1 1

% 100% 48.8% 51.2% 4.9% 2.4% 41.5% 46.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.4% 2.4% 0.0% 0.0%


#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Total Hires


From Temporary

Dispatching (2151)

Accessions


# 2057 1226 831 40 23 1120 776 6 3 15 8 7 9 36 12 2

% 100% 59.6% 40.4% 1.9% 1.1% 54.4% 37.7% 0.3% 0.1% 0.7% 0.4% 0.3% 0.4% 1.8% 0.6% 0.1% 0.0%


# 14 8 6 1 1 7 5

% 100% 57.1% 42.9% 7.1% 7.1% 50.0% 35.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


# 1 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


# 20 18 2 2 12 1 1 1 3

% 100% 90.0% 10.0% 10.0% 0.0% 60.0% 5.0% 0.0% 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.0% 0.0% 15.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


# 65 35 30 34 27 1 3

% 100% 53.8% 46.2% 0.0% 0.0% 52.3% 41.5% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.6% 0.0% 0.0%


# 1132 951 181 67 7 817 164 10 10 2 22 3 24 4 1 1

% 100% 84.0% 16.0% 5.9% 0.6% 72.2% 14.5% 0.9% 0.0% 0.9% 0.2% 1.9% 0.3% 2.1% 0.4% 0.1% 0.1%


# 679 574 105 62 3 363 72 5 1 7 14 1 123 28

% 100% 84.5% 15.5% 9.1% 0.4% 53.5% 10.6% 0.7% 0.1% 1.0% 0.0% 2.1% 0.1% 18.1% 4.1% 0.0% 0.0%



Accessions


Accessions

Accessions

Park Ranger (0025)


Accessions


Table A7-Alt: HIRES FOR MAJOR OCCUPATIONS by Race/Ethnicity and Sex - Temporary Workforce



TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino



American


Accessions

American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

racesAsian

Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander


Accessions


Accessions


Park Ranger (0025)





TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino



American

American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

racesAsian

Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

# 13 12 1 1 10 1 1

% 100% 92.3% 7.7% 7.7% 0.0% 76.9% 7.7% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


# 1 1 1

% 100% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


# 2 2 2

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


# 7 4 3 4 2 1

% 100% 57.1% 42.9% 0.0% 0.0% 57.1% 28.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


# 23 16 7 1 16 6

% 100% 69.6% 30.4% 0.0% 4.3% 69.6% 26.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


# 53 35 18 1 35 17

% 100% 66.0% 34.0% 0.0% 1.9% 66.0% 32.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


# 1 1 1

% 100% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


Geophysics (1313)

Accessions

Hydrology (1315)

Accessions


Accessions


Accessions

Geology (1350)

Accessions


Accessions


Accessions


Park Ranger (0025)





TOTAL

EMPLOYEES

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino



American

American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

racesAsian

Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


# 93 26 67 1 5 24 57 2 1 3

% 100% 28.0% 72.0% 1.1% 5.4% 25.8% 61.3% 0.0% 2.2% 0.0% 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 3.2% 0.0% 0.0%



Accessions

Dispatching (2151)

Accessions


# 3680 2168 1512 98 77 1628 982 125 132 52 52 5 7 249 251 11 11

% 100% 58.9% 41.1% 2.7% 2.1% 44.2% 26.7% 3.4% 3.6% 1.4% 1.4% 0.1% 0.2% 6.8% 6.8% 0.3% 0.3%

# 1201 760 441 52 31 619 344 31 21 17 18 8 5 32 21 1 1

% 100% 63.3% 36.7% 4.3% 2.6% 51.5% 28.6% 2.6% 1.7% 1.4% 1.5% 0.7% 0.4% 2.7% 1.7% 0.1% 0.1%

# 4881 2928 1953 150 108 2247 1326 156 153 69 70 13 12 281 272 12 12

% 100% 60.0% 40.0% 3.1% 2.2% 46.0% 27.2% 3.2% 3.1% 1.4% 1.4% 0.3% 0.2% 5.8% 5.6% 0.2% 0.2%

# 13292 8585 4707 340 165 7363 4029 169 91 108 70 103 38 490 309 12 5

% 100% 64.6% 35.4% 2.6% 1.2% 55.4% 30.3% 1.3% 0.7% 0.8% 0.5% 0.8% 0.3% 3.7% 2.3% 0.1% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -




Accessions

American Indian

or Alaska Native

Permanent Workforce

Two or more

races

Black or African

American


White

Temporary Workforce

From Temporary

Accessions


Table A8: NEW HIRES BY TYPE OF APPOINTMENT - Distribution by Race/Ethnicity and Sex

Employment TenureTOTAL

WORKFORCE

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino


Organizational CLF is based on the number of incumbants in each occupation in the organization.

Accessions

Asian

Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

Total Hires


Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 267 175 92 10 4 150 80 5 2 2 2 2 7 2 1

% 100% 65.5% 34.5% 3.7% 1.5% 56.2% 30.0% 1.9% 0.7% 0.7% 0.7% 0.0% 0.7% 2.6% 0.7% 0.4% 0.0%

# 3498 2275 1223 122 58 1937 1030 90 63 36 25 11 9 75 38 4

% 100% 65.0% 35.0% 3.5% 1.7% 55.4% 29.4% 2.6% 1.8% 1.0% 0.7% 0.3% 0.3% 2.1% 1.1% 0.1% 0.0%

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 9 4 5 1 2 4 1 1

% 100% 44.4% 55.6% 11.1% 0.0% 22.2% 44.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.1% 11.1% 0.0% 0.0%

# 325 167 158 9 1 136 128 2 5 3 9 1 17 13 1

% 100% 51.4% 48.6% 2.8% 0.3% 41.8% 39.4% 0.6% 1.5% 0.9% 2.8% 0.0% 0.3% 5.2% 4.0% 0.0% 0.3%

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 4 3 1 2 1 1

% 100% 75.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 93 49 44 4 2 38 23 4 10 2 2 1 7

% 100% 52.7% 47.3% 4.3% 2.2% 40.9% 24.7% 4.3% 10.8% 0.0% 2.2% 2.2% 0.0% 1.1% 7.5% 0.0% 0.0%

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 1 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 115 108 7 8 74 4 14 3 1 3 8

% 100% 93.9% 6.1% 7.0% 0.0% 64.3% 3.5% 12.2% 2.6% 0.9% 0.0% 2.6% 0.0% 7.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Selected

Qualified

Relevant Pool

Relevant Pool

Selected

Black or African

American


Qualified

Park Ranger (0025)

American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

races

Relevant Pool


Relevant Pool

White


Qualified

Qualified

Selected


Table A9-1: SELECTIONS FOR INTERNAL COMPETITIVE PROMOTIONS FOR MAJOR OCCUPATIONS by Race/Ethnicity and Sex

Based on occupational series of employee after the promotion

ActionTOTAL

WORKFORCE

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino


Asian

Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

Selected


Black or African

American

Park Ranger (0025)

American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

racesWhite




ActionTOTAL

WORKFORCE

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino


Asian

Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 180 122 58 7 4 105 52 1 1 3 1 6

% 100% 67.8% 32.2% 3.9% 2.2% 58.3% 28.9% 0.6% 0.6% 1.7% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 3.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 3441 2192 1249 108 56 1911 1093 19 20 22 42 3 2 123 36 6

% 100% 63.7% 36.3% 3.1% 1.6% 55.5% 31.8% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 1.2% 0.1% 0.1% 3.6% 1.0% 0.2% 0.0%

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 65 62 3 2 51 3 2 1 6

% 100% 95.4% 4.6% 3.1% 0.0% 78.5% 4.6% 3.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.5% 0.0% 9.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 897 797 100 60 4 630 90 7 6 9 84 6 1

% 100% 88.9% 11.1% 6.7% 0.4% 70.2% 10.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 9.4% 0.7% 0.1% 0.0%

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 65 60 5 4 36 4 2 1 17 1

% 100% 92.3% 7.7% 6.2% 0.0% 55.4% 6.2% 0.0% 0.0% 3.1% 0.0% 1.5% 0.0% 26.2% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0%

# 920 800 120 48 2 470 66 6 2 7 2 7 262 48

% 100% 87.0% 13.0% 5.2% 0.2% 51.1% 7.2% 0.7% 0.2% 0.8% 0.2% 0.8% 0.0% 28.5% 5.2% 0.0% 0.0%

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 69 52 17 5 2 39 12 4 1 1 3 2

% 100% 75.4% 24.6% 7.2% 2.9% 56.5% 17.4% 0.0% 0.0% 5.8% 1.4% 1.4% 0.0% 4.3% 2.9% 0.0% 0.0%

# 908 738 170 51 9 575 126 8 8 32 15 3 68 12 1

% 100% 81.3% 18.7% 5.6% 1.0% 63.3% 13.9% 0.9% 0.9% 3.5% 1.7% 0.3% 0.0% 7.5% 1.3% 0.1% 0.0%

Selected


Qualified

Relevant Pool

Selected

Selected

Relevant Pool


Relevant Pool


Relevant Pool

Qualified


Qualified

Selected

Qualified


Black or African

American

Park Ranger (0025)

American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

racesWhite




ActionTOTAL

WORKFORCE

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino


Asian

Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 7 3 4 1 3 3

% 100% 42.9% 57.1% 0.0% 14.3% 42.9% 42.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 199 161 38 17 3 124 27 8 2 17 1

% 100% 80.9% 19.1% 8.5% 1.5% 62.3% 13.6% 0.0% 4.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8.5% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0%

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 13 13 10 1 2

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 76.9% 0.0% 7.7% 0.0% 15.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 286 237 49 9 4 172 33 25 8 24 2 2 5 2

% 100% 82.9% 17.1% 3.1% 1.4% 60.1% 11.5% 8.7% 2.8% 8.4% 0.7% 0.7% 0.0% 1.7% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0%

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 6 5 1 1 4 1

% 100% 83.3% 16.7% 16.7% 0.0% 66.7% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 275 204 71 4 2 182 64 5 1 10 4 1 1 1

% 100% 74.2% 25.8% 1.5% 0.7% 66.2% 23.3% 1.8% 0.4% 3.6% 1.5% 0.4% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0%

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 49 32 17 1 31 17

% 100% 65.3% 34.7% 2.0% 0.0% 63.3% 34.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1360 1025 335 24 5 961 311 7 3 22 10 1 10 6

% 100% 75.4% 24.6% 1.8% 0.4% 70.7% 22.9% 0.5% 0.2% 1.6% 0.7% 0.1% 0.0% 0.7% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0%

Relevant Pool

Relevant Pool

Qualified

Selected

Relevant Pool

Relevant Pool


Qualified

Selected

Selected

Hydrology (1315)

Qualified

Geophysics (1313)

Qualified

Selected



Black or African

American

Park Ranger (0025)

American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

racesWhite




ActionTOTAL

WORKFORCE

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino


Asian

Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 22 16 6 15 6 1

% 100% 72.7% 27.3% 0.0% 0.0% 68.2% 27.3% 4.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 808 572 236 7 2 550 219 6 2 5 10 1 3 3

% 100% 70.8% 29.2% 0.9% 0.2% 68.1% 27.1% 0.7% 0.2% 0.6% 1.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.4% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0%

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 35 32 3 3 24 3 1 4

% 100% 91.4% 8.6% 8.6% 0.0% 68.6% 8.6% 2.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 743 602 141 50 16 492 99 25 9 13 6 3 19 10 1

% 100% 81.0% 19.0% 6.7% 2.2% 66.2% 13.3% 3.4% 1.2% 1.7% 0.8% 0.4% 0.0% 2.6% 1.3% 0.0% 0.1%

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 39 33 6 1 17 3 1 14 3

% 100% 84.6% 15.4% 2.6% 0.0% 43.6% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.6% 0.0% 35.9% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0%

# 550 480 70 30 3 287 43 11 2 6 4 7 139 18

% 100% 87.3% 12.7% 5.5% 0.5% 52.2% 7.8% 2.0% 0.4% 1.1% 0.7% 1.3% 0.0% 25.3% 3.3% 0.0% 0.0%

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 7 3 4 3 3 1

% 100% 42.9% 57.1% 0.0% 0.0% 42.9% 42.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0%

# 163 80 83 5 3 66 64 5 9 1 1 1 2 6

% 100% 49.1% 50.9% 3.1% 1.8% 40.5% 39.3% 3.1% 5.5% 0.6% 0.0% 0.6% 0.6% 1.2% 3.7% 0.0% 0.0%

Relevant Pool

Relevant Pool

Qualified

Selected

Dispatching (2151)

Qualified

Selected

Selected


Geology (1350)

Qualified

Selected

Relevant Pool

Relevant Pool


Qualified


Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 245 168 77 10 3 143 68 5 3 2 1 1 7 1 1

% 100% 68.6% 31.4% 4.1% 1.2% 58.4% 27.8% 2.0% 1.2% 0.8% 0.4% 0.0% 0.4% 2.9% 0.4% 0.4% 0.0%

# 3498 2275 1223 122 58 1937 1030 90 63 36 25 11 9 75 38 4

% 100% 65.0% 35.0% 3.5% 1.7% 55.4% 29.4% 2.6% 1.8% 1.0% 0.7% 0.3% 0.3% 2.1% 1.1% 0.1% 0.0%

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 10 5 5 4 5 1

% 100% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 325 167 158 9 1 136 128 2 5 3 9 1 17 13 1

% 100% 51.4% 48.6% 2.8% 0.3% 41.8% 39.4% 0.6% 1.5% 0.9% 2.8% 0.0% 0.3% 5.2% 4.0% 0.0% 0.3%

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 4 4 3 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 93 49 44 4 2 38 23 4 10 2 2 1 7

% 100% 52.7% 47.3% 4.3% 2.2% 40.9% 24.7% 4.3% 10.8% 0.0% 2.2% 2.2% 0.0% 1.1% 7.5% 0.0% 0.0%

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 1 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 115 108 7 8 74 4 14 3 1 3 8

% 100% 93.9% 6.1% 7.0% 0.0% 64.3% 3.5% 12.2% 2.6% 0.9% 0.0% 2.6% 0.0% 7.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

Qualified

Selected

Park Ranger (0025)

Two or more

races



Based on occupational series of employee before the promotion

ActionTOTAL

WORKFORCE

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino


WhiteAmerican Indian

or Alaska Native

Black or African

AmericanAsian

Selected

Qualified

Relevant Pool

Selected


Qualified


Relevant Pool


Qualified

Selected

Relevant Pool

Relevant Pool


Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

Park Ranger (0025)

Two or more

races




ActionTOTAL

WORKFORCE

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino



or Alaska Native

Black or African

AmericanAsian

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 160 113 47 4 4 93 41 2 1 4 1 10

% 100% 70.6% 29.4% 2.5% 2.5% 58.1% 25.6% 1.3% 0.6% 2.5% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 6.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 3441 2192 1249 108 56 1911 1093 19 20 22 42 3 2 123 36 6

% 100% 63.7% 36.3% 3.1% 1.6% 55.5% 31.8% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 1.2% 0.1% 0.1% 3.6% 1.0% 0.2% 0.0%

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 75 68 7 3 57 7 2 2 4

% 100% 90.7% 9.3% 4.0% 0.0% 76.0% 9.3% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% 0.0% 5.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 897 797 100 60 4 630 90 7 6 9 84 6 1

% 100% 88.9% 11.1% 6.7% 0.4% 70.2% 10.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 9.4% 0.7% 0.1% 0.0%

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 84 79 5 6 51 4 1 2 19 1

% 100% 94.0% 6.0% 7.1% 0.0% 60.7% 4.8% 1.2% 0.0% 2.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 22.6% 1.2% 0.0% 0.0%

# 920 800 120 48 2 470 66 6 2 7 2 7 262 48

% 100% 87.0% 13.0% 5.2% 0.2% 51.1% 7.2% 0.7% 0.2% 0.8% 0.2% 0.8% 0.0% 28.5% 5.2% 0.0% 0.0%

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 72 53 19 3 2 42 14 5 1 1 2 2

% 100% 73.6% 26.4% 4.2% 2.8% 58.3% 19.4% 0.0% 0.0% 6.9% 1.4% 1.4% 0.0% 2.8% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0%

# 908 738 170 51 9 575 126 8 8 32 15 3 68 12 1

% 100% 81.3% 18.7% 5.6% 1.0% 63.3% 13.9% 0.9% 0.9% 3.5% 1.7% 0.3% 0.0% 7.5% 1.3% 0.1% 0.0%


Relevant Pool


Qualified

Selected


Relevant Pool

Qualified

Selected

Selected

Relevant Pool

Qualified

Selected

Qualified

Relevant Pool



Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

Park Ranger (0025)

Two or more

races




ActionTOTAL

WORKFORCE

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino



or Alaska Native

Black or African

AmericanAsian

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 4 3 1 3 1

% 100% 75.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 75.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 199 161 38 17 3 124 27 8 2 17 1

% 100% 80.9% 19.1% 8.5% 1.5% 62.3% 13.6% 0.0% 4.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8.5% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0%

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 17 16 1 12 2 2 1

% 100% 94.1% 5.9% 0.0% 0.0% 70.6% 0.0% 11.8% 0.0% 11.8% 5.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 286 237 49 9 4 172 33 25 8 24 2 2 5 2

% 100% 82.9% 17.1% 3.1% 1.4% 60.1% 11.5% 8.7% 2.8% 8.4% 0.7% 0.7% 0.0% 1.7% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0%

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 7 6 1 1 4 1 1

% 100% 85.7% 14.3% 14.3% 0.0% 57.1% 14.3% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 275 204 71 4 2 182 64 5 1 10 4 1 1 1

% 100% 74.2% 25.8% 1.5% 0.7% 66.2% 23.3% 1.8% 0.4% 3.6% 1.5% 0.4% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0%

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 49 35 14 35 14

% 100% 71.4% 28.6% 0.0% 0.0% 71.4% 28.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1360 1025 335 24 5 961 311 7 3 22 10 1 10 6

% 100% 75.4% 24.6% 1.8% 0.4% 70.7% 22.9% 0.5% 0.2% 1.6% 0.7% 0.1% 0.0% 0.7% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0%

Geophysics (1313)


Qualified

Selected

Selected

Relevant Pool

Relevant Pool


Qualified

Selected

Relevant Pool

Relevant Pool

Qualified

Selected

Hydrology (1315)

Qualified


Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

Park Ranger (0025)

Two or more

races




ActionTOTAL

WORKFORCE

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino



or Alaska Native

Black or African

AmericanAsian

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 23 16 7 16 7

% 100% 69.6% 30.4% 0.0% 0.0% 69.6% 30.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 808 572 236 7 2 550 219 6 2 5 10 1 3 3

% 100% 70.8% 29.2% 0.9% 0.2% 68.1% 27.1% 0.7% 0.2% 0.6% 1.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.4% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0%

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 32 29 3 2 24 3 3

% 100% 90.6% 9.4% 6.3% 0.0% 75.0% 9.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 9.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 743 602 141 50 16 492 99 25 9 13 6 3 19 10 1

% 100% 81.0% 19.0% 6.7% 2.2% 66.2% 13.3% 3.4% 1.2% 1.7% 0.8% 0.4% 0.0% 2.6% 1.3% 0.0% 0.1%

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 30 25 5 1 14 3 1 9 2

% 100% 83.3% 16.7% 3.3% 0.0% 46.7% 10.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.3% 0.0% 30.0% 6.7% 0.0% 0.0%

# 550 480 70 30 3 287 43 11 2 6 4 7 139 18

% 100% 87.3% 12.7% 5.5% 0.5% 52.2% 7.8% 2.0% 0.4% 1.1% 0.7% 1.3% 0.0% 25.3% 3.3% 0.0% 0.0%

Applicants #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 6 2 4 2 3 1

% 100% 33.3% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0%

# 163 80 83 5 3 66 64 5 9 1 1 1 2 6

% 100% 49.1% 50.9% 3.1% 1.8% 40.5% 39.3% 3.1% 5.5% 0.6% 0.0% 0.6% 0.6% 1.2% 3.7% 0.0% 0.0%

Selected


Geology (1350)

Qualified

Selected

Relevant Pool

Relevant Pool


Qualified

Relevant Pool

Relevant Pool

Qualified

Selected

Dispatching (2151)

Qualified

Selected


# 6210 3627 2583 199 196 2804 1719 152 185 104 91 21 11 336 373 11 8

% 100% 58.4% 41.6% 3.2% 3.2% 45.2% 27.7% 2.4% 3.0% 1.7% 1.5% 0.3% 0.2% 5.4% 6.0% 0.2% 0.1%

# 658 392 266 22 18 317 178 9 11 7 8 2 2 34 48 1 1

% 100% 59.6% 40.4% 3.3% 2.7% 48.2% 27.1% 1.4% 1.7% 1.1% 1.2% 0.3% 0.3% 5.2% 7.3% 0.2% 0.2%

# 458 295 163 11 10 253 129 6 3 7 2 2 1 16 17 1

% 100% 64.4% 35.6% 2.4% 2.2% 55.2% 28.2% 1.3% 0.7% 1.5% 0.4% 0.4% 0.2% 3.5% 3.7% 0.0% 0.2%

# 987 642 345 21 15 562 277 18 15 12 17 2 26 21 1

% 100% 65.0% 35.0% 2.1% 1.5% 56.9% 28.1% 1.8% 1.5% 1.2% 1.7% 0.2% 0.0% 2.6% 2.1% 0.1% 0.0%

13 - 24 months

25+ months

American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

races

Time in grade in excess of minimum

1 - 12 months

Total Employees Eligible

for Career Ladder

Promotions


Table A10: NON-COMPETITIVE PROMOTIONS - TIME IN GRADE - Distribution by Race/Ethnicity and Sex

Permanent WorkforceTOTAL

WORKFORCE

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino



AmericanAsian

Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander


#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 460 268 192 13 16 208 123 11 15 9 11 2 1 25 26

% 100% 58.3% 41.7% 2.8% 3.5% 45.2% 26.7% 2.4% 3.3% 2.0% 2.4% 0.4% 0.2% 5.4% 5.7% 0.0% 0.0%

# 9484 5547 3937 264 253 4530 2881 195 312 134 156 27 16 381 307 16 12

% 100% 58.5% 41.5% 2.8% 2.7% 47.8% 30.4% 2.1% 3.3% 1.4% 1.6% 0.3% 0.2% 4.0% 3.2% 0.2% 0.1%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 277 176 101 3 5 144 70 9 7 6 2 14 17

% 100% 63.5% 36.5% 1.1% 1.8% 52.0% 25.3% 3.2% 2.5% 2.2% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 5.1% 6.1% 0.0% 0.0%

# 6974 4257 2717 204 151 3513 1970 150 231 123 97 9 14 251 249 7 5

% 100% 61.0% 39.0% 2.9% 2.2% 50.4% 28.2% 2.2% 3.3% 1.8% 1.4% 0.1% 0.2% 3.6% 3.6% 0.1% 0.1%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 89 52 37 3 1 41 24 1 5 1 7 6

% 100% 58.4% 41.6% 3.4% 1.1% 46.1% 27.0% 1.1% 5.6% 0.0% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 7.9% 6.7% 0.0% 0.0%

# 3632 2236 1396 88 71 1836 1013 81 118 57 57 8 1 163 133 3 3

% 100% 61.6% 38.4% 2.4% 2.0% 50.6% 27.9% 2.2% 3.2% 1.6% 1.6% 0.2% 0.0% 4.5% 3.7% 0.1% 0.1%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 21 13 8 1 1 7 5 1 1 4 1

% 100% 61.9% 38.1% 4.8% 4.8% 33.3% 23.8% 4.8% 4.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 19.0% 4.8% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1819 1213 606 39 25 1000 447 52 48 22 18 4 94 68 2

% 100% 66.7% 33.3% 2.1% 1.4% 55.0% 24.6% 2.9% 2.6% 1.2% 1.0% 0.2% 0.0% 5.2% 3.7% 0.1% 0.0%

Relevant Pool

Relevant Pool

Senior Executive Service Vacancies

Applied

Qualified

Selected


Table A11: INTERNAL SELECTIONS FOR SENIOR LEVEL POSITIONS (GS 13/14, GS 15, AND SES) by Race/Ethnicity and Sex

ActionTOTAL

WORKFORCE

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino


WhiteTwo or more

races

American Indian

or Alaska Native

Black or African

American

GS-14 Vacancies

Applied

Qualified

Applied

Relevant Pool

Asian

Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

Selected

GS-13 Vacancies

Qualified

Selected

GS-15 Vacancies

Selected

Relevant Pool

Applied

Qualified


# 5192 3053 2139 186 172 2501 1550 184 190 57 70 16 11 100 138 9 8

% 100% 58.8% 41.2% 3.6% 3.3% 48.2% 29.9% 3.5% 3.7% 1.1% 1.3% 0.3% 0.2% 1.9% 2.7% 0.2% 0.2%

Total Hours 32992 19633 13359 1238 1031 15957 9751 1262 1232 374 424 87 64 644 803 71 54

Average Hours 6 6 6 7 6 6 6 7 6 7 6 5 6 6 6 8 7

# 11644 6584 5060 303 345 5367 3745 431 412 135 178 29 18 303 350 16 12

% 100% 56.5% 43.5% 2.6% 3.0% 46.1% 32.2% 3.7% 3.5% 1.2% 1.5% 0.2% 0.2% 2.6% 3.0% 0.1% 0.1%

Total Hours 290863 156190 134673 6727 8917 129248 100059 8284 10185 2851 4670 657 462 8128 10093 295 287

Average Hours 25 24 27 22 26 24 27 19 25 21 26 23 26 27 29 18 24

# 10217 5848 4369 405 401 4695 3019 233 328 132 171 37 43 334 393 12 14

% 100% 57.2% 42.8% 4.0% 3.9% 46.0% 29.5% 2.3% 3.2% 1.3% 1.7% 0.4% 0.4% 3.3% 3.8% 0.1% 0.1%

Total Amount $3,837,064 $2,184,356 $1,652,708 $150,737 $154,302 $1,749,665 $1,133,847 $86,891 $121,203 $52,024 $61,148 $13,458 $15,547 $126,890 $161,069 $4,691 $5,592

Average Amount $376 $374 $378 $372 $385 $373 $376 $373 $370 $394 $358 $364 $362 $380 $410 $391 $399

# 32112 18517 13595 1031 936 15096 9737 778 1114 393 452 80 58 1097 1267 42 31

% 100% 57.7% 42.3% 3.2% 2.9% 47.0% 30.3% 2.4% 3.5% 1.2% 1.4% 0.2% 0.2% 3.4% 3.9% 0.1% 0.1%

Total Amount $41,445,614 $23,827,571 $17,618,043 $1,271,886 $1,147,294 $19,486,605 $12,536,328 $956,968 $1,527,420 $478,054 $559,881 $94,374 $69,418 $1,487,259 $1,742,463 $52,425 $35,239

Average Amount $1,291 $1,287 $1,296 $1,234 $1,226 $1,291 $1,287 $1,230 $1,371 $1,216 $1,239 $1,180 $1,197 $1,356 $1,375 $1,248 $1,137

# 145 98 47 5 4 65 32 10 4 1 1 16 7

% 100% 67.6% 32.4% 3.4% 2.8% 44.8% 22.1% 6.9% 2.8% 0.7% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 11.0% 4.8% 0.0% 0.0%

Total Amount $1,597,860 $1,047,129 $550,731 $38,120 $39,914 $748,641 $407,037 $91,684 $38,583 $8,985 $7,708 $151,991 $65,197

Average Amount $11,020 $10,685 $11,718 $7,624 $9,979 $11,518 $12,720 $9,168 $9,646 $8,985 - $7,708 - $9,499 $9,314 - -

# 1643 812 831 34 51 676 615 34 57 19 36 3 2 43 69 3 1

% 100% 49.4% 50.6% 2.1% 3.1% 41.1% 37.4% 2.1% 3.5% 1.2% 2.2% 0.2% 0.1% 2.6% 4.2% 0.2% 0.1%

Total Benefit $4,327,881 $2,191,295 $2,136,586 $81,356 $123,791 $1,831,211 $1,583,557 $91,439 $148,156 $54,910 $98,963 $7,658 $4,633 $113,994 $176,060 $10,727 $1,426

Average Benefit $2,634 $2,699 $2,571 $2,393 $2,427 $2,709 $2,575 $2,689 $2,599 $2,890 $2,749 $2,553 $2,317 $2,651 $2,552 $3,576 $1,426

Quality Step Increases (QSI)

Cash Awards - $100 - $500

Cash Awards $501+

Total Cash Awards

Given

Senior Executive Service Performance Awards

Total Cash Awards

Given

Two or more

races

Time-Off awards - 1-9 hours

Time-Off awards - 9+ hours

Total Time-Off Awards

Given

Black or African

AmericanAsian

Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

American Indian

or Alaska Native

Total QSIs Awarded


Given

Total Cash Awards

Given


Table A13: EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION AND AWARDS - Distribution by Race/Ethnicity and Sex - Permanent Workforce

Type of AwardTOTAL

WORKFORCE

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino


White


# 4609 2711 1898 140 111 2104 1339 129 199 68 47 14 13 248 182 8 7

% 100% 58.8% 41.2% 3.0% 2.4% 45.6% 29.1% 2.8% 4.3% 1.5% 1.0% 0.3% 0.3% 5.4% 3.9% 0.2% 0.2%

# 165 105 60 8 2 63 28 7 7 3 1 3 1 21 18 3

% 100% 63.6% 36.4% 4.8% 1.2% 38.2% 17.0% 4.2% 4.2% 1.8% 0.6% 1.8% 0.6% 12.7% 10.9% 0.0% 1.8%

# 4 2 2 1 2 1

% 100% 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 4778 2818 1960 148 113 2167 1368 136 206 71 48 17 14 271 201 8 10

% 100% 59.0% 41.0% 3.1% 2.4% 45.4% 28.6% 2.8% 4.3% 1.5% 1.0% 0.4% 0.3% 5.7% 4.2% 0.2% 0.2%

# 54033 32516 21517 1853 1473 25247 14713 1459 1729 686 677 189 108 3011 2758 71 59

% 100% 60.2% 39.8% 3.4% 2.7% 46.7% 27.2% 2.7% 3.2% 1.3% 1.3% 0.3% 0.2% 5.6% 5.1% 0.1% 0.1%

Total Separations

Permanent Workforce

(09/30/2014)

American Indian

or Alaska Native

Two or more

races

Voluntary

Involuntary

RIF


Table A14: SEPARATIONS BY TYPE OF SEPARATION - Distribution by Race/Ethnicity and Sex - Permanent Workforce

Type of SeparationTOTAL

WORKFORCE

RACE/ETHNICITY

Hispanic or

Latino



AmericanAsian

Native Hawaiian

or Other Pacific

Islander

# 70443 61449 3261 5733 691 79 61 37 117 23 103 34 223 14

% 100% 87.2% 4.6% 8.1% 1.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%

# 70167 60564 3913 5690 675 71 57 37 112 23 97 31 233 14

% 100% 86.3% 5.6% 8.1% 1.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%

Federal Goal%

2.0%

Difference # -276 -885 652 -43 -16 -8 -4 0 -5 0 -6 -3 10 0

Ratio Change % - -0.9% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Net Change % -0.4% -1.4% 20.0% -0.8% -2.3% -10.1% -6.6% 0.0% -4.3% 0.0% -5.8% -8.8% 4.5% 0.0%

# 54033 47575 1900 4558 595 73 51 31 105 21 85 32 184 13

% 100% 88.0% 3.5% 8.4% 1.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.1% 0.3% 0.0%

# 53732 46933 2278 4521 570 67 46 29 100 21 78 29 187 13

% 100% 87.3% 4.2% 8.4% 1.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.0%

Difference # -301 -642 378 -37 -25 -6 -5 -2 -5 0 -7 -3 3 0

Ratio Change % - -0.7% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Net Change % -0.6% -1.3% 19.9% -0.8% -4.2% -8.2% -9.8% -6.5% -4.8% 0.0% -8.2% -9.4% 1.6% 0.0%

# 16410 13874 1361 1175 96 6 10 6 12 2 18 2 39 1

% 100% 84.5% 8.3% 7.2% 0.6% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%

# 16435 13631 1635 1169 105 4 11 8 12 2 19 2 46 1

% 100% 82.9% 9.9% 7.1% 0.6% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%

Difference # 25 -243 274 -6 9 -2 1 2 0 0 1 0 7 0

Ratio Change % - -1.6% 1.7% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Net Change % 0.2% -1.8% 20.1% -0.5% 9.4% -33.3% 10.0% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 5.6% 0.0% 17.9% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Difference # 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Ratio Change % - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Net Change % - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Prior FY

(16-18)

Deafness

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

Employment Tenure

Total Workforce

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis


Table B1: TOTAL WORKFORCE - Distribution by Disability

Total

Total by Disability Status Detail for Targeted Disabilities

(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

Current FY


Current FY

Prior FY

Current FY

Prior FY

Current FY

Prior FY

Permanent Workforce

Temporary Workforce

# 53732 46933 2278 4521 570 67 46 29 100 21 78 29 187 13

% 100% 87.3% 4.2% 8.4% 1.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.0%

Federal Goal % 2.0%

# 4156 3635 152 369 46 7 7 3 6 7 1 15

% 100% 87.5% 3.7% 8.9% 1.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0%

# 8746 7665 381 700 79 7 4 6 9 1 7 7 32 6

% 100% 87.6% 4.4% 8.0% 0.9% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.4% 0.1%

# 4095 3653 274 168 11 3 4 1 1 2

% 100% 89.2% 6.7% 4.1% 0.3% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 373 329 22 22 3 2 1

% 100% 88.2% 5.9% 5.9% 0.8% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 5015 4082 253 680 85 8 4 5 16 5 14 4 27 2

% 100% 81.4% 5.0% 13.6% 1.7% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.1% 0.3% 0.1% 0.5% 0.0%

# 6814 6217 148 449 57 5 1 3 11 2 9 5 19 2

% 100% 91.2% 2.2% 6.6% 0.8% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.0%

# 14919 12964 747 1208 172 25 19 9 27 5 28 11 45 3

% 100% 86.9% 5.0% 8.1% 1.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.1% 0.3% 0.0%

# 7827 6850 231 746 104 13 6 3 23 6 12 1 40

% 100% 87.5% 3.0% 9.5% 1.3% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0%

# 411 337 21 53 5 1 1 3

% 100% 82.0% 5.1% 12.9% 1.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0%

# 814 709 31 74 5 1 1 3

% 100% 87.1% 3.8% 9.1% 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0%

# 562 492 18 52 3 1 1 1

% 100% 87.5% 3.2% 9.3% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%

Bureau of Safety &

Environmental Enforcement

Bureau of Ocean Energy

Management

Bureau of Reclamation

U.S. Geological Survey


Table B2: PERMANENT WORKFORCE BY COMPONENT - Distribution by Disability

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

Bureau of Indian Education

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

National Park Service

Fish & Wildlife Service

Office of Surface Mining,

Reclamation & Enforcement

(16-18)

DeafnessComponent

Total

Office of the Secretary of the

Interior

Bureau of Land Management

Bureau of Indian Affairs

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy


# 1310 1189 48 73 1 1

% 100% 90.8% 3.7% 5.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%

# 4296 3879 165 252 32 2 2 3 7 4 4 9 1

% 100% 90.3% 3.8% 5.9% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%

# 4381 4006 142 233 24 1 3 2 6 1 4 5 2

% 100% 91.4% 3.2% 5.3% 0.5% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%

# 8420 7285 365 770 75 8 6 15 2 12 31 1

% 100% 86.5% 4.3% 9.1% 0.9% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0%

# 18407 16359 720 1328 132 11 11 5 28 7 20 45 5

% 100% 88.9% 3.9% 7.2% 0.7% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%

# 16910 15077 604 1229 152 17 14 8 22 6 27 2 54 2

% 100% 89.2% 3.6% 7.3% 0.9% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%

# 3725 3306 137 282 30 7 1 4 6 4 1 7

% 100% 88.8% 3.7% 7.6% 0.8% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%

# 5 5

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 5616 4407 334 875 165 14 15 9 31 7 14 15 56 4

% 100% 78.5% 5.9% 15.6% 2.9% 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% 0.6% 0.1% 0.2% 0.3% 1.0% 0.1%

# 3722 3099 196 427 34 8 1 2 3 2 5 13

% 100% 83.3% 5.3% 11.5% 0.9% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.0%

# 456 378 32 46 3 2 1

% 100% 82.9% 7.0% 10.1% 0.7% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%

# 468 376 33 59 14 5 2 3 3 1

% 100% 80.3% 7.1% 12.6% 3.0% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.6% 0.6% 0.2%

# 3980 3559 196 225 35 3 4 1 9 1 6 3 7 1

% 100% 89.4% 4.9% 5.7% 0.9% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0%

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy


TOTAL

2. Professionals

3. Technicians

(16-18)

DeafnessOccupational Category





Below)

- Other


Table B3-1: OCCUPATIONAL CATEGORIES - Distribution by Disability - Permanent Workforce

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability


9. Service Workers

4. Sales Workers


Workers

6. Craft Workers

7. Operatives


# 1310 1189 48 73 1 1

% 2.4% 2.5% 2.1% 1.6% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 7.7%

# 4296 3879 165 252 32 2 2 3 7 4 4 9 1

% 8.0% 8.3% 7.2% 5.6% 5.6% 3.0% 4.3% 10.3% 7.0% 19.0% 5.1% 0.0% 4.8% 7.7%

# 4381 4006 142 233 24 1 3 2 6 1 4 5 2

% 8.2% 8.5% 6.2% 5.2% 4.2% 1.5% 6.5% 6.9% 6.0% 4.8% 5.1% 0.0% 2.7% 15.4%

# 8420 7285 365 770 75 8 6 15 2 12 31 1

% 15.7% 15.5% 16.0% 17.0% 13.2% 11.9% 13.0% 0.0% 15.0% 9.5% 15.4% 0.0% 16.6% 7.7%

# 18407 16359 720 1328 132 11 11 5 28 7 20 45 5

% 34.3% 34.9% 31.6% 29.4% 23.2% 16.4% 23.9% 17.2% 28.0% 33.3% 25.6% 0.0% 24.1% 38.5%

# 16910 15077 604 1229 152 17 14 8 22 6 27 2 54 2

% 31.5% 32.1% 26.5% 27.2% 26.7% 25.4% 30.4% 27.6% 22.0% 28.6% 34.6% 6.9% 28.9% 15.4%

# 3725 3306 137 282 30 7 1 4 6 4 1 7

% 6.9% 7.0% 6.0% 6.2% 5.3% 10.4% 2.2% 13.8% 6.0% 0.0% 5.1% 3.4% 3.7% 0.0%

# 5 5

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 5616 4407 334 875 165 14 15 9 31 7 14 15 56 4

% 10.5% 9.4% 14.7% 19.4% 28.9% 20.9% 32.6% 31.0% 31.0% 33.3% 17.9% 51.7% 29.9% 30.8%

# 3722 3099 196 427 34 8 1 2 3 2 5 13

% 6.9% 6.6% 8.6% 9.4% 6.0% 11.9% 2.2% 6.9% 3.0% 0.0% 2.6% 17.2% 7.0% 0.0%

# 456 378 32 46 3 2 1

% 0.8% 0.8% 1.4% 1.0% 0.5% 3.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0%

# 468 376 33 59 14 5 2 3 3 1

% 0.9% 0.8% 1.4% 1.3% 2.5% 7.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.6% 10.3% 1.6% 7.7%

# 3980 3559 196 225 35 3 4 1 9 1 6 3 7 1

% 7.4% 7.6% 8.6% 5.0% 6.1% 4.5% 8.7% 3.4% 9.0% 4.8% 7.7% 10.3% 3.7% 7.7%

# 53732 46933 2278 4521 570 67 46 29 100 21 78 29 187 13

% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%


9. Service Workers

Permanent Workforce

4. Sales Workers


Workers

6. Craft Workers

7. Operatives


Table B3-2: OCCUPATIONAL CATEGORIES - Distribution by Disability - Permanent Workforce

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability


TOTAL

2. Professionals

3. Technicians

(16-18)

DeafnessOccupational Category





Below)

- Other

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

# 3 1 2

% 100% 33.3% 0.0% 66.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 26 14 3 9 5 1 4

% 100% 53.8% 11.5% 34.6% 19.2% 0.0% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 15.4% 0.0% 0.0%

# 145 97 21 27 10 2 1 2 4 1

% 100% 66.9% 14.5% 18.6% 6.9% 1.4% 0.7% 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 2.8% 0.7% 0.0%

# 512 400 34 78 20 1 1 4 4 3 7

% 100% 78.1% 6.6% 15.2% 3.9% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.8% 0.0% 0.8% 0.6% 1.4% 0.0%

# 2302 1832 159 311 51 4 8 2 10 4 5 4 14

% 100% 79.6% 6.9% 13.5% 2.2% 0.2% 0.3% 0.1% 0.4% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.6% 0.0%

# 1850 1456 136 258 44 6 3 3 8 1 3 1 19

% 100% 78.7% 7.4% 13.9% 2.4% 0.3% 0.2% 0.2% 0.4% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 1.0% 0.0%

# 4359 3680 236 443 65 8 6 4 11 2 5 2 23 4

% 100% 84.4% 5.4% 10.2% 1.5% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.5% 0.1%

# 1097 973 26 98 17 1 1 2 2 5 5 1

% 100% 88.7% 2.4% 8.9% 1.5% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.5% 0.1%

# 6109 5343 237 529 71 11 8 3 14 2 12 20 1

% 100% 87.5% 3.9% 8.7% 1.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%

# 169 148 7 14 1 1

% 100% 87.6% 4.1% 8.3% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 8849 7869 313 667 73 6 3 2 13 3 15 31

% 100% 88.9% 3.5% 7.5% 0.8% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0%

# 9431 8428 319 684 67 9 4 3 12 4 9 23 3

% 100% 89.4% 3.4% 7.3% 0.7% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%

# 7077 6373 250 454 55 2 4 4 14 5 6 19 1

% 100% 90.1% 3.5% 6.4% 0.8% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%

# 3661 3316 134 211 24 5 1 6 5 7

% 100% 90.6% 3.7% 5.8% 0.7% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%

# 1560 1426 46 88 1 1

% 100% 91.4% 2.9% 5.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%

# 791 755 19 17 1 1

% 100% 95.4% 2.4% 2.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 251 225 11 15

% 100% 89.6% 4.4% 6.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Senior Executive Service

GS-13

GS-14

GS-15

All other (unspecified GS)


Table B4-1: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR GENERAL SCHEDULE (GS) GRADES by Disability - Permanent Workforce

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

GS-10

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

GS-02

GS-04

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

(01)

Not

Identified

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

GS-11

GS-12

GS/GM, SES & Related

Pay Plans

GS-01

GS-05

GS-06

GS-07

GS-08

GS-09

GS-03

# 105 93 5 7

% 100% 88.6% 4.8% 6.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 214 187 13 14 3 2 1

% 100% 87.4% 6.1% 6.5% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0%

# 877 746 79 52 5 1 3 1

% 100% 85.1% 9.0% 5.9% 0.6% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%

# 2177 1743 280 154 20 2 3 2 3 1 9

% 100% 80.1% 12.9% 7.1% 0.9% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0%

# 3579 2859 442 278 24 1 1 1 8 12 1

% 100% 79.9% 12.3% 7.8% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%

# 543 453 42 48 8 2 1 1 4

% 100% 83.4% 7.7% 8.8% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0%

# 1308 1130 103 75 2 2

% 100% 86.4% 7.9% 5.7% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%

# 49 48 1

% 100% 98.0% 0.0% 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 662 561 49 52 8 1 1 1 2 3

% 100% 84.7% 7.4% 7.9% 1.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0%

# 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 448 390 27 31 2 1 1

% 100% 87.1% 6.0% 6.9% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%

# 333 289 19 25 2 2

% 100% 86.8% 5.7% 7.5% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0%

# 115 90 16 9

% 100% 78.3% 13.9% 7.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 123 102 11 10 1 1

% 100% 82.9% 8.9% 8.1% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0%

# 43 36 1 6

% 100% 83.7% 2.3% 14.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 2110 1902 66 142 13 5 3 1 3 1

% 100% 90.1% 3.1% 6.7% 0.6% 0.0% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 15 12 2 1

% 100% 80.0% 13.3% 6.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

GS-12


Pay Plans

GS-01

GS-05

GS-06

GS-07

GS-08

GS-09

GS-10

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

(16-18)

Deafness

GS-11

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities


Table B4-1: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR GENERAL SCHEDULE (GS) GRADES by Disability - Temporary Workforce

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism


GS-13

GS-14

GS-15


(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

GS-02

GS-03

GS-04

(01)

Not

Identified

# 3 1 2

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 26 14 3 9 5 1 4

% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% 1.0% 0.0% 2.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 22.2% 0.0% 0.0%

# 145 97 21 27 10 2 1 2 4 1

% 0.3% 0.2% 1.1% 0.7% 2.0% 4.0% 2.3% 0.0% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 22.2% 0.6% 0.0%

# 512 400 34 78 20 1 1 4 4 3 7

% 1.1% 0.9% 1.7% 2.0% 4.0% 2.0% 0.0% 3.7% 4.2% 0.0% 5.8% 16.7% 4.1% 0.0%

# 2302 1832 159 311 51 4 8 2 10 4 5 4 14

% 4.8% 4.3% 8.1% 8.0% 10.1% 8.0% 18.2% 7.4% 10.4% 19.0% 7.2% 22.2% 8.3% 0.0%

# 1850 1456 136 258 44 6 3 3 8 1 3 1 19

% 3.8% 3.4% 7.0% 6.6% 8.7% 12.0% 6.8% 11.1% 8.3% 4.8% 4.3% 5.6% 11.2% 0.0%

# 4359 3680 236 443 65 8 6 4 11 2 5 2 23 4

% 9.0% 8.7% 12.1% 11.3% 12.9% 16.0% 13.6% 14.8% 11.5% 9.5% 7.2% 11.1% 13.6% 36.4%

# 1097 973 26 98 17 1 1 2 2 5 5 1

% 2.3% 2.3% 1.3% 2.5% 3.4% 2.0% 2.3% 7.4% 2.1% 0.0% 7.2% 0.0% 3.0% 9.1%

# 6109 5343 237 529 71 11 8 3 14 2 12 20 1

% 12.7% 12.6% 12.1% 13.5% 14.1% 22.0% 18.2% 11.1% 14.6% 9.5% 17.4% 0.0% 11.8% 9.1%

# 169 148 7 14 1 1

% 0.4% 0.3% 0.4% 0.4% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 3.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 8849 7869 313 667 73 6 3 2 13 3 15 31

% 18.4% 18.6% 16.0% 17.1% 14.5% 12.0% 6.8% 7.4% 13.5% 14.3% 21.7% 0.0% 18.3% 0.0%

# 9431 8428 319 684 67 9 4 3 12 4 9 23 3

% 19.6% 19.9% 16.4% 17.5% 13.3% 18.0% 9.1% 11.1% 12.5% 19.0% 13.0% 0.0% 13.6% 27.3%

# 7077 6373 250 454 55 2 4 4 14 5 6 19 1

% 14.7% 15.1% 12.8% 11.6% 10.9% 4.0% 9.1% 14.8% 14.6% 23.8% 8.7% 0.0% 11.2% 9.1%

# 3661 3316 134 211 24 5 1 6 5 7

% 7.6% 7.8% 6.9% 5.4% 4.8% 0.0% 11.4% 3.7% 6.3% 0.0% 7.2% 0.0% 4.1% 0.0%

# 1560 1426 46 88 1 1

% 3.2% 3.4% 2.4% 2.3% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 9.1%

# 791 755 19 17 1 1

% 1.6% 1.8% 1.0% 0.4% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 3.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 251 225 11 15

% 0.5% 0.5% 0.6% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 48192 42336 1951 3905 505 50 44 27 96 21 69 18 169 11

% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%TOTAL


GS-10

GS-11

GS-12


GS-13

GS-14

GS-15


GS-01


Pay Plans


Table B4-2: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR GENERAL SCHEDULE (GS) GRADES by Disability - Permanent Workforce

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

GS-06

GS-07

GS-08

GS-09

GS-02

GS-03

GS-04

GS-05

# 105 93 5 7

% 0.8% 0.9% 0.4% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0%

# 214 187 13 14 3 2 1

% 1.7% 1.8% 1.1% 1.5% 3.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.8% - 2.7% 0.0%

# 877 746 79 52 5 1 3 1

% 6.9% 7.0% 6.8% 5.7% 5.7% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 30.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 2.7% 0.0%

# 2177 1743 280 154 20 2 3 2 3 1 9

% 17.1% 16.4% 24.2% 17.0% 22.7% 50.0% 30.0% 28.6% 30.0% 0.0% 5.9% - 24.3% 0.0%

# 3579 2859 442 278 24 1 1 1 8 12 1

% 28.2% 26.9% 38.3% 30.7% 27.3% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 10.0% 50.0% 47.1% - 32.4% 100.0%

# 543 453 42 48 8 2 1 1 4

% 4.3% 4.3% 3.6% 5.3% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0% 28.6% 10.0% 0.0% 5.9% - 10.8% 0.0%

# 1308 1130 103 75 2 2

% 10.3% 10.6% 8.9% 8.3% 2.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 5.4% 0.0%

# 49 48 1

% 0.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0%

# 662 561 49 52 8 1 1 1 2 3

% 5.2% 5.3% 4.2% 5.7% 9.1% 25.0% 10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0% 11.8% - 8.1% 0.0%

# 1 1

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0%

# 448 390 27 31 2 1 1

% 3.5% 3.7% 2.3% 3.4% 2.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% - 2.7% 0.0%

# 333 289 19 25 2 2

% 2.6% 2.7% 1.6% 2.8% 2.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 5.4% 0.0%

# 115 90 16 9

% 0.9% 0.8% 1.4% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0%

# 123 102 11 10 1 1

% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.1% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 2.7% 0.0%

# 43 36 1 6

% 0.3% 0.3% 0.1% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0%

# 2110 1902 66 142 13 5 3 1 3 1

% 16.6% 17.9% 5.7% 15.7% 14.8% 0.0% 50.0% 42.9% 10.0% 0.0% 17.6% - 2.7% 0.0%

# 15 12 2 1

% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0%

# 12702 10642 1155 905 88 4 10 7 10 2 17 37 1

% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100%

GS-08

GS-09

GS-02

GS-03

GS-04

GS-05

GS-06

GS-07

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

GS-01


Pay Plans


Table B4-2: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR GENERAL SCHEDULE (GS) GRADES by Disability - Temporary Workforce

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

TOTAL


GS-10

GS-11

GS-12


GS-13

GS-14

GS-15


# 25 17 1 7 3 3

% 100% 68.0% 4.0% 28.0% 12.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 69 51 7 11 6 2 1 2 1

% 100% 73.9% 10.1% 15.9% 8.7% 2.9% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 2.9% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0%

# 131 99 10 22 8 1 1 1 1 3 1

% 100% 75.6% 7.6% 16.8% 6.1% 0.8% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.8% 0.8% 2.3% 0.8%

# 90 57 14 19 4 1 2 1

% 100% 63.3% 15.6% 21.1% 4.4% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.2% 1.1% 0.0%

# 487 395 22 70 13 6 1 1 1 1 3

% 100% 81.1% 4.5% 14.4% 2.7% 1.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% 0.6% 0.0%

# 237 197 12 28 2 1 1

% 100% 83.1% 5.1% 11.8% 0.8% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0%

# 525 434 38 53 3 1 1 1

% 100% 82.7% 7.2% 10.1% 0.6% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0%

# 666 545 43 78 4 1 1 1 1

% 100% 81.8% 6.5% 11.7% 0.6% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0%

# 608 517 36 55 3 1 1 1

% 100% 85.0% 5.9% 9.0% 0.5% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%

# 875 755 42 78 7 2 1 1 3

% 100% 86.3% 4.8% 8.9% 0.8% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.0%

# 62 53 3 6

% 100% 85.5% 4.8% 9.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 9 7 2

% 100% 77.8% 22.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 1292 1064 69 159 10 1 1 3 5

% 100% 82.4% 5.3% 12.3% 0.8% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0%

Grade-14

Grade-15

All Other Non-supervisory

Wage Grades

Grade-10

Grade-11

Grade-12

Grade-13

Grade-09

Grade-01

Grade-02

Grade-03

Grade-04

Grade-05

Grade-06

Grade-07

Grade-08

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

WG, WL & Equivalent Pay

Plans


Table B5NS-1: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR NON-SUPERVISORY WAGE GRADES by Disability - Permanent Workforce

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

# 83 72 5 6 1 1

% 100% 86.7% 6.0% 7.2% 1.2% 0.0% 1.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 221 183 22 16 4 2 2

% 100% 82.8% 10.0% 7.2% 1.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.9% 0.0%

# 458 342 83 33 3 1 2

% 100% 74.7% 18.1% 7.2% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0%

# 263 195 45 23

% 100% 74.1% 17.1% 8.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1052 800 175 77 3 1 1 1

% 100% 76.0% 16.6% 7.3% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%

# 116 89 11 16 1 1

% 100% 76.7% 9.5% 13.8% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0%

# 369 302 40 27 1 1

% 100% 81.8% 10.8% 7.3% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%

# 188 156 21 11

% 100% 83.0% 11.2% 5.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 124 94 19 11 2 1 1

% 100% 75.8% 15.3% 8.9% 1.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 67 56 4 7

% 100% 83.6% 6.0% 10.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 2 2

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 780 689 54 37 2 2

% 100% 88.3% 6.9% 4.7% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%


Plans


Table B5NS-1: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR NON-SUPERVISORY WAGE GRADES by Disability - Temporary Workforce

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

Grade-09

Grade-01

Grade-02

Grade-03

Grade-04

Grade-05

Grade-06

Grade-07

Grade-08

Grade-14

Grade-15


Wage Grades

Grade-10

Grade-11

Grade-12

Grade-13

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 6 5 1

% 100% 83.3% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 2 1 1

% 100% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 11 11

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 29 23 3 3

% 100% 79.3% 10.3% 10.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 29 26 2 1

% 100% 89.7% 6.9% 3.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 66 60 3 3

% 100% 90.9% 4.5% 4.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 49 44 5

% 100% 89.8% 0.0% 10.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 93 81 4 8 1 1

% 100% 87.1% 4.3% 8.6% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.1%

# 154 135 14 5

% 100% 87.7% 9.1% 3.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 21 17 2 2 1 1

% 100% 81.0% 9.5% 9.5% 4.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 4.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 2 2

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 1 1

% 100% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

WS, XS & Equivalent Pay

Plans


Table B5S-1: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR SUPERVISORY WAGE GRADES by Disability - Permanent Workforce

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

Grade-09

Grade-01

Grade-02

Grade-03

Grade-04

Grade-05

Grade-06

Grade-07

Grade-08

Grade-14

Grade-15


Grades

Grade-10

Grade-11

Grade-12

Grade-13

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 4 3 1

% 100% 75.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 3 3

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Grade-14

Grade-15


Grades

Grade-10

Grade-11

Grade-12

Grade-13

Grade-09

Grade-01

Grade-02

Grade-03

Grade-04

Grade-05

Grade-06

Grade-07

Grade-08

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability


Plans


Table B5S-1: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR SUPERVISORY WAGE GRADES by Disability - Temporary Workforce

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

# 25 17 1 7 3 3

% 0.5% 0.4% 0.3% 1.2% 4.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 27.3% 0.0% 0.0%

# 69 51 7 11 6 2 1 2 1

% 1.4% 1.2% 2.3% 1.9% 9.5% 11.8% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% - 25.0% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0%

# 131 99 10 22 8 1 1 1 1 3 1

% 2.6% 2.4% 3.3% 3.8% 12.7% 5.9% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 12.5% 9.1% 16.7% 100.0%

# 90 57 14 19 4 1 2 1

% 1.8% 1.4% 4.7% 3.2% 6.3% 5.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 18.2% 5.6% 0.0%

# 487 395 22 70 13 6 1 1 1 1 3

% 9.6% 9.4% 7.4% 11.9% 20.6% 35.3% 0.0% 50.0% 25.0% - 12.5% 9.1% 16.7% 0.0%

# 237 197 12 28 2 1 1

% 4.7% 4.7% 4.0% 4.8% 3.2% 5.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 5.6% 0.0%

# 525 434 38 53 3 1 1 1

% 10.3% 10.4% 12.7% 9.0% 4.8% 5.9% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% - 0.0% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0%

# 666 545 43 78 4 1 1 1 1

% 13.1% 13.0% 14.4% 13.3% 6.3% 5.9% 0.0% 0.0% 25.0% - 0.0% 9.1% 5.6% 0.0%

# 608 517 36 55 3 1 1 1

% 12.0% 12.3% 12.0% 9.4% 4.8% 5.9% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 5.6% 0.0%

# 875 755 42 78 7 2 1 1 3

% 17.2% 18.0% 14.0% 13.3% 11.1% 11.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 12.5% 9.1% 16.7% 0.0%

# 62 53 3 6

% 1.2% 1.3% 1.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 9 7 2

% 0.2% 0.2% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1292 1064 69 159 10 1 1 3 5

% 25.5% 25.4% 23.1% 27.1% 15.9% 5.9% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% - 37.5% 0.0% 27.8% 0.0%

# 5076 4191 299 586 63 17 2 2 4 8 11 18 1

% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% 100%


Grades


Plans


Table B5NS-2: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR NON-SUPERVISORY WAGE GRADES by Disability - Permanent Workforce

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

Grade-09

Grade-01

Grade-02

Grade-03

Grade-04

Grade-05

Grade-06

Grade-07

Grade-08

Grade-14

Grade-15


Wage Grades

Grade-10

Grade-11

Grade-12

Grade-13

# 83 72 5 6 1 1

% 2.2% 2.4% 1.0% 2.3% 5.9% - 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -

# 221 183 22 16 4 2 2

% 5.9% 6.1% 4.6% 6.1% 23.5% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 100.0% 22.2% -

# 458 342 83 33 3 1 2

% 12.3% 11.5% 17.3% 12.5% 17.6% - 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 22.2% -

# 263 195 45 23

% 7.1% 6.5% 9.4% 8.7% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -

# 1052 800 175 77 3 1 1 1

% 28.2% 26.8% 36.5% 29.2% 17.6% - 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% - 50.0% 0.0% 11.1% -

# 116 89 11 16 1 1

% 3.1% 3.0% 2.3% 6.1% 5.9% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 11.1% -

# 369 302 40 27 1 1

% 9.9% 10.1% 8.4% 10.2% 5.9% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 11.1% -

# 188 156 21 11

% 5.0% 5.2% 4.4% 4.2% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -

# 124 94 19 11 2 1 1

% 3.3% 3.2% 4.0% 4.2% 11.8% - 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% - 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% -

# 67 56 4 7

% 1.8% 1.9% 0.8% 2.7% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -

# 1 1

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -

# 2 2

% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% -

# 780 689 54 37 2 2

% 20.9% 23.1% 11.3% 14.0% 11.8% - 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - 0.0% 0.0% 22.2% -

# 3724 2981 479 264 17 1 1 2 2 2 9

% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% - 100% 100% 100% -

Grade-14

Grade-15


Wage Grades

Grade-10

Grade-11

Grade-12

Grade-13

Grade-09

Grade-01

Grade-02

Grade-03

Grade-04

Grade-05

Grade-06

Grade-07

Grade-08

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual


Grades


Plans


Table B5NS-2: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR NON-SUPERVISORY WAGE GRADES by Disability - Temporary Workforce

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - 0.0% - - 0.0%

# 6 5 1

% 1.3% 1.2% 0.0% 3.3% 0.0% - - - - - 0.0% - - 0.0%

# 2 1 1

% 0.4% 0.2% 0.0% 3.3% 0.0% - - - - - 0.0% - - 0.0%

# 11 11

% 2.4% 2.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - 0.0% - - 0.0%

# 29 23 3 3

% 6.3% 5.7% 10.7% 10.0% 0.0% - - - - - 0.0% - - 0.0%

# 29 26 2 1

% 6.3% 6.4% 7.1% 3.3% 0.0% - - - - - 0.0% - - 0.0%

# 66 60 3 3

% 14.2% 14.8% 10.7% 10.0% 0.0% - - - - - 0.0% - - 0.0%

# 49 44 5

% 10.6% 10.8% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% - - - - - 0.0% - - 0.0%

# 93 81 4 8 1 1

% 20.0% 20.0% 14.3% 26.7% 50.0% - - - - - 0.0% - - 100.0%

# 154 135 14 5

% 33.2% 33.3% 50.0% 16.7% 0.0% - - - - - 0.0% - - 0.0%

# 21 17 2 2 1 1

% 4.5% 4.2% 7.1% 6.7% 50.0% - - - - - 100.0% - - 0.0%

# 2 2

% 0.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - 0.0% - - 0.0%

# 1 1

% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - 0.0% - - 0.0%

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - 0.0% - - 0.0%

# 1 1

% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 3.3% 0.0% - - - - - 0.0% - - 0.0%

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - 0.0% - - 0.0%

# 464 406 28 30 2 1 1

% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% - - - - - 100% - - 100%

Grade-14

Grade-15


Grades

Grade-10

Grade-11

Grade-12

Grade-13

Grade-09

Grade-01

Grade-02

Grade-03

Grade-04

Grade-05

Grade-06

Grade-07

Grade-08

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion

of

Limb/Spine,

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

Total Supervisory Wage

Grades


Plans


Table B5S-2: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR SUPERVISORY WAGE GRADES by Disability - Permanent Workforce

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - - -

# 1 1

% 11.1% 12.5% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - - -

# 4 3 1

% 44.4% 37.5% 100.0% - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - - -

# 3 3

% 33.3% 37.5% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - - -

# 1 1

% 11.1% 12.5% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% - - - - - - - - - - -

# 9 8 1

% 100% 100% 100% - - - - - - - - - - -

Total Supervisory Wage

Grades


Plans


Table B5S-2: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR SUPERVISORY WAGE GRADES by Disability - Temporary Workforce

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

Grade-09

Grade-01

Grade-02

Grade-03

Grade-04

Grade-05

Grade-06

Grade-07

Grade-08

Grade-14

Grade-15


Grades

Grade-10

Grade-11

Grade-12

Grade-13

# 313 31 2 1 1

% 100% 9.9% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%

# 88 12

% 100% 13.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 105 11 2 1 1

% 100% 10.5% 1.9% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 886 29 1 1

% 100% 3.3% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 922 26 2 1 1

% 100% 2.8% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%

# 210 28 1 1

% 100% 13.3% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0%

# 295 22 1 1

% 100% 7.5% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 277 16 1 1

% 100% 5.8% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4%

# 1356 49 3 3

% 100% 3.6% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 790 46 4 1 3

% 100% 5.8% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0%

# 781 40 2 1 1

% 100% 5.1% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%

# 545 13 1 1

% 100% 2.4% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability


Table B6: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR MAJOR OCCUPATIONS - Distribution by Disability - Permanent

Workforce

Job Title/Series Total

Total by

Disability StatusDetail for Targeted Disabilities




Technician (0802)


(0881)

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism


Specialist (0028)


(0080)


(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

Geophysics (1313)

Hydrology (1315)

Geology (1350)




(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability


Table B6: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR MAJOR OCCUPATIONS - Distribution by Disability - Permanent

Workforce

Job Title/Series Total

Total by

Disability StatusDetail for Targeted Disabilities

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism


Specialist (0028)

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

# 183 19 1 1

% 100% 10.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Dispatching (2151)

# 3284 3007 92 185 22 4 1 6 5 6

% 100% 91.6% 2.8% 5.6% 0.7% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%

# 313 266 16 31 2 1 1

% 100% 85.0% 5.1% 9.9% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%

# 88 73 3 12

% 100% 83.0% 3.4% 13.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 105 81 13 11 2 1 1

% 100% 77.1% 12.4% 10.5% 1.9% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 3444 3154 87 203 18 1 3 3 11

% 100% 91.6% 2.5% 5.9% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%

# 886 834 23 29 1 1

% 100% 94.1% 2.6% 3.3% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 922 877 19 26 2 1 1

% 100% 95.1% 2.1% 2.8% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%

# 902 808 29 65 9 3 4 1 1

% 100% 89.6% 3.2% 7.2% 1.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%

# 210 171 11 28 1 1

% 100% 81.4% 5.2% 13.3% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0%

# 295 266 7 22 1 1

% 100% 90.2% 2.4% 7.5% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 277 258 3 16 1 1

% 100% 93.1% 1.1% 5.8% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4%

# 1356 1287 20 49 3 3

% 100% 94.9% 1.5% 3.6% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 790 713 31 46 4 1 3

% 100% 90.3% 3.9% 5.8% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0%

# 781 721 20 40 2 1 1

% 100% 92.3% 2.6% 5.1% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%

# 545 505 27 13 1 1

% 100% 92.7% 5.0% 2.4% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%

Geology (1350)





(0881)


Geophysics (1313)


Technician (0802)

Hydrology (1315)


Specialist (0028)




(0080)




Park Ranger (0025)

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

Job Title/Series


Table B6: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR MAJOR OCCUPATIONS - Distribution by Disability - Permanent Workforce

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

Park Ranger (0025)

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

Job Title/Series


Table B6: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR MAJOR OCCUPATIONS - Distribution by Disability - Permanent Workforce

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

# 183 151 13 19 1 1

% 100% 82.5% 7.1% 10.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Dispatching (2151)

# 1763 1402 218 143 13 4 2 6 1

% 100% 79.5% 12.4% 8.1% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% 0.1%

# 34 30 2 2 1 1

% 100% 88.2% 5.9% 5.9% 2.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 2 1 1

% 100% 50.0% 0.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 72 60 2 10

% 100% 83.3% 2.8% 13.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 236 212 11 13 2 1 1

% 100% 89.8% 4.7% 5.5% 0.8% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 799 724 51 24 2 1 1

% 100% 90.6% 6.4% 3.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 571 499 54 18 2 1 1

% 100% 87.4% 9.5% 3.2% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%

# 39 32 3 4 1 1

% 100% 82.1% 7.7% 10.3% 2.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.6% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 3 3

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 18 18

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 95 86 6 3 2 1 1

% 100% 90.5% 6.3% 3.2% 2.1% 1.1% 1.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 91 80 4 7

% 100% 87.9% 4.4% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Table B6: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR MAJOR OCCUPATIONS - Distribution by Disability - Temporary Workforce

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

(16-18)

Deafness


Specialist (0028)




(0080)



Targeted

Disability

Park Ranger (0025)

Job Title/Series



Technician (0802)

Geology (1350)




Hydrology (1315)


(0881)


Geophysics (1313)


Table B6: PARTICIPATION RATES FOR MAJOR OCCUPATIONS - Distribution by Disability - Temporary Workforce

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

(16-18)

Deafness

Targeted

Disability

Park Ranger (0025)

Job Title/Series

# 68 50 10 8

% 100% 73.5% 14.7% 11.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Dispatching (2151)

# 60 50 6 4

% 100% 83.3% 10.0% 6.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 81 66 9 6

% 100% 81.5% 11.1% 7.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 141 116 15 10

% 100% 82.3% 10.6% 7.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 33 30 2 1

% 100% 90.9% 6.1% 3.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 21 16 3 2

% 100% 76.2% 14.3% 9.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 4 4

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 25 20 3 2

% 100% 80.0% 12.0% 8.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 2 2

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 6 5 1

% 100% 83.3% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 7 6 1

% 100% 85.7% 0.0% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

Job Title/Series

From Temporary

Total Hires



Accessions

From Temporary

Total Hires

Accessions

Park Ranger (0025)

From Temporary


Accessions

Total Hires


Table B7-ALT: HIRES by Disability - Permanent Workforce

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy



(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

Job Title/Series

Park Ranger (0025)



Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

# 11 8 2 1

% 100% 72.7% 18.2% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 5 1 4

% 100% 20.0% 80.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 16 9 6 1

% 100% 56.3% 37.5% 6.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 131 110 15 6 1 1

% 100% 84.0% 11.5% 4.6% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0%

# 69 63 2 4 1 1

% 100% 91.3% 2.9% 5.8% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 0.0%

# 200 173 17 10 2 2

% 100% 86.5% 8.5% 5.0% 1.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.0% 0.0%

# 30 28 2

% 100% 93.3% 0.0% 6.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 96 85 5 6

% 100% 88.5% 5.2% 6.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 30 26 2 2

% 100% 86.7% 6.7% 6.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 126 111 7 8

% 100% 88.1% 5.6% 6.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Accessions

From Temporary

Total Hires



From Temporary

Total Hires

Accessions





Accessions

From Temporary

Total Hires

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

Job Title/Series

Park Ranger (0025)



Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

# 89 84 5

% 100% 94.4% 5.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 32 31 1

% 100% 96.9% 0.0% 3.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 121 115 5 1

% 100% 95.0% 4.1% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 70 59 5 6

% 100% 84.3% 7.1% 8.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 8 5 3 1 1

% 100% 62.5% 0.0% 37.5% 12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.5% 0.0%

# 78 64 5 9 1 1

% 100% 82.1% 6.4% 11.5% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.3% 0.0%

# 7 7

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 20 13 1 6

% 100% 65.0% 5.0% 30.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 21 14 1 6

% 100% 66.7% 4.8% 28.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From Temporary

Total Hires

Accessions

From Temporary

Total Hires




Accessions

Accessions



From Temporary

Total Hires


(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

Job Title/Series

Park Ranger (0025)



Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

# 33 27 3 3 1 1

% 100% 81.8% 9.1% 9.1% 3.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 3 3

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 36 30 3 3 1 1

% 100% 83.3% 8.3% 8.3% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 3 3

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 10 8 2

% 100% 80.0% 0.0% 20.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 6 6

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 16 14 2

% 100% 87.5% 0.0% 12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 30 27 2 1

% 100% 90.0% 6.7% 3.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 31 29 1 1

% 100% 93.5% 3.2% 3.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 61 56 3 2

% 100% 91.8% 4.9% 3.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 22 19 1 2

% 100% 86.4% 4.5% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


Accessions

From Temporary

Total Hires

Total Hires


Hydrology (1315)

Accessions


Geophysics (1313)

Accessions

From Temporary

From Temporary

Total Hires


(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

Job Title/Series

Park Ranger (0025)



Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

# 33 29 3 1

% 100% 87.9% 9.1% 3.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 11 5 3 3

% 100% 45.5% 27.3% 27.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 44 34 6 4

% 100% 77.3% 13.6% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 5 3 2

% 100% 60.0% 0.0% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 37 32 1 4

% 100% 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 38 33 1 4

% 100% 86.8% 2.6% 10.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 19 13 6

% 100% 68.4% 31.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 19 13 6

% 100% 68.4% 31.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Accessions

From Temporary

Total Hires


Geology (1350)



Accessions

From Temporary


Accessions

From Temporary

Total Hires

Total Hires


(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

Job Title/Series

Park Ranger (0025)



Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

# 29 17 6 6 1 1

% 100% 58.6% 20.7% 20.7% 3.4% 0.0% 0.0% 3.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 12 10 2

% 100% 83.3% 0.0% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 41 27 6 8 1 1

% 100% 65.9% 14.6% 19.5% 2.4% 0.0% 0.0% 2.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

From Temporary

Total Hires


Dispatching (2151)

Accessions

# 2057 1629 285 143 17 4 2 10 1

% 100% 79.2% 13.9% 7.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0%

# 14 12 1 1

% 100% 85.7% 7.1% 7.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1 1

% 100% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 20 15 4 1

% 100% 75.0% 20.0% 5.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 65 60 2 3 1 1

% 100% 92.3% 3.1% 4.6% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1132 1029 67 36 2 1 1

% 100% 90.9% 5.9% 3.2% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 679 599 59 21 2 1 1

% 100% 88.2% 8.7% 3.1% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%

# 13 11 1 1

% 100% 84.6% 7.7% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 2 2

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


Accessions

Accessions


Accessions



Accessions

Job Title/Series


Table B7-ALT: HIRES by Disability - Temporary Workforce

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability


Accessions

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

Accessions

Accessions

Accessions


Park Ranger (0025)

Accessions




Accessions

Job Title/Series


Table B7-ALT: HIRES by Disability - Temporary Workforce

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

Park Ranger (0025)

# 7 7

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 23 21 2

% 100% 91.3% 8.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 53 45 3 5

% 100% 84.9% 5.7% 9.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 93 72 16 5

% 100% 77.4% 17.2% 5.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Dispatching (2151)

Accessions

Geology (1350)

Accessions

Accessions


Accessions


Geophysics (1313)

Accessions

Hydrology (1315)

Accessions

# 3680 2685 571 424 36 1 3 1 2 1 3 25

% 100% 73.0% 15.5% 11.5% 1.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0%

# 1201 962 109 130 11 1 4 1 5

% 100% 80.1% 9.1% 10.8% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.3% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0%

# 4881 3647 680 554 47 1 3 2 6 1 4 30

% 100% 74.7% 13.9% 11.4% 1.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0%

# 2193 1696 235 262 33 1 1 2 1 2 5 20 1

% 100% 77.3% 10.7% 11.9% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0%

# 850 700 63 87 10 1 2 2 1 4

% 100% 82.4% 7.4% 10.2% 1.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.1% 0.5% 0.0%

# 3043 2396 298 349 43 1 1 3 3 2 7 1 24 1

% 100% 78.7% 9.8% 11.5% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0%

# 13292 10602 1819 871 79 3 3 5 11 13 2 40 2

% 100% 79.8% 13.7% 6.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%

# 12398 10030 1447 921 68 4 3 5 10 1 10 34 1

% 100% 80.9% 11.7% 7.4% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

FY2014 Accessions

Accessions

Permanent Workforce

Temporary Workforce


(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

Accessions

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

From Temporary

FY2014 Accessions

Accessions

Total Hires


Table B8-ALT: NEW HIRES By Type of Appointment - Distribution by Disability

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

FY2014 Total Hires

FY2014 Accessions

FY2014

From Temporary

Employment Tenure(01)

Not

Identified

Targeted

Disability

(16-18)

Deafness

# 61 3 11 47 13 3 2 8

% 100% 4.9% 18.0% 77.0% 21.3% 0.0% 4.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.3% 0.0% 13.1% 0.0%

# 37 2 11 24 6 1 3 2

% 100% 5.4% 29.7% 64.9% 16.2% 0.0% 0.0% 2.7% 8.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.4% 0.0%

# 98 5 22 71 19 3 1 3 2 10

% 100% 5.1% 22.4% 72.4% 19.4% 0.0% 3.1% 1.0% 3.1% 0.0% 2.0% 0.0% 10.2% 0.0%

# 47 1 11 35 13 1 1 1 1 9

% 100% 2.1% 23.4% 74.5% 27.7% 0.0% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 19.1% 0.0%

# 18 2 16 1 1

% 100% 0.0% 11.1% 88.9% 5.6% 0.0% 0.0% 5.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 65 1 13 51 14 1 2 1 1 9

% 100% 1.5% 20.0% 78.5% 21.5% 0.0% 1.5% 3.1% 1.5% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 13.8% 0.0%

# 51 2 17 32 13 1 1 1 3 1 6

% 100% 3.9% 33.3% 62.7% 25.5% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.9% 2.0% 11.8% 0.0%

# 35 6 29 14 1 2 2 2 1 6

% 100% 0.0% 17.1% 82.9% 40.0% 2.9% 5.7% 5.7% 5.7% 2.9% 0.0% 0.0% 17.1% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

Accessions

(16-18)

Deafness

(04, 05)

No

Disability

Total Hires

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

Permanent Workforce

Accessions

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability


Table B8-ALT_SchedA: NEW SCHEDULE A HIRES By Type of Appointment - Distribution by Disability

Employment Tenure Total



(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

From Temporary

FY2014 Accessions

FY2014 Accessions

FY2014 From Temporary

FY2014 Total Hires

Temporary Workforce

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

FY2014 Accessions

(01)

Not

Identified

Accessions

(82)

Epilepsy

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 267 251 8 8 1 1

% 100% 94.0% 3.0% 3.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 3498 3207 87 204 29 5 2 9 8 5

% 100% 91.7% 2.5% 5.8% 0.8% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 9 8 1

% 100% 88.9% 0.0% 11.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 325 279 17 29 2 1 1

% 100% 85.8% 5.2% 8.9% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 4 4

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 93 77 5 11

% 100% 82.8% 5.4% 11.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 115 91 9 15 2 1 1

% 100% 79.1% 7.8% 13.0% 1.7% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Selected


Relevant Pool

Relevant Pool

Qualified

Selected

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

Park Ranger (0025)

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

(82)

EpilepsyApplicants

Qualified

Selected


Qualified

Selected

Relevant Pool


Relevant Pool

Qualified

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(01)

Not

Identified

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability


Table B9-1: SELECTIONS FOR INTERNAL COMPETITIVE PROMOTIONS FOR MAJOR OCCUPATIONS - Distribution by Disability


Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

Park Ranger (0025)

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

(82)

EpilepsyApplicants

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(01)

Not

Identified

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability




Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 180 173 1 6

% 100% 96.1% 0.6% 3.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 3441 3160 79 202 21 2 3 3 13

% 100% 91.8% 2.3% 5.9% 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0%

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 65 63 1 1

% 100% 96.9% 1.5% 1.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 897 851 21 25 2 1 1

% 100% 94.9% 2.3% 2.8% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 65 65

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 920 877 16 27 2 1 1

% 100% 95.3% 1.7% 2.9% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 69 65 1 3 1 1

% 100% 94.2% 1.4% 4.3% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 908 818 29 61 8 3 4 1

% 100% 90.1% 3.2% 6.7% 0.9% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%


Relevant Pool

Relevant Pool


Qualified

Selected

Relevant Pool

Qualified

Selected

Selected


Qualified

Selected

Relevant Pool


Qualified

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

Park Ranger (0025)

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

(82)

EpilepsyApplicants

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(01)

Not

Identified

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability




Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 7 6 1

% 100% 85.7% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 199 162 10 27 1 1

% 100% 81.4% 5.0% 13.6% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0%

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 13 12 1

% 100% 92.3% 0.0% 7.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 286 263 5 18

% 100% 92.0% 1.7% 6.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 6 6

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 275 256 4 15 1 1

% 100% 93.1% 1.5% 5.5% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4%

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 49 45 2 2

% 100% 91.8% 4.1% 4.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1360 1291 21 48 3 3

% 100% 94.9% 1.5% 3.5% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Relevant Pool

Relevant Pool

Relevant Pool

Geophysics (1313)

Qualified

Selected

Relevant Pool

Selected

Qualified

Selected

Hydrology (1315)


Qualified

Selected


Qualified

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

Park Ranger (0025)

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

(82)

EpilepsyApplicants

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(01)

Not

Identified

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability




Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 22 20 1 1

% 100% 90.9% 4.5% 4.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 808 733 30 45 5 2 3

% 100% 90.7% 3.7% 5.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0%

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 35 32 1 2

% 100% 91.4% 2.9% 5.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 743 677 22 44 3 1 2

% 100% 91.1% 3.0% 5.9% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 39 37 1 1

% 100% 94.9% 2.6% 2.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 550 519 21 10 1 1

% 100% 94.4% 3.8% 1.8% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 7 6 1

% 100% 85.7% 14.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 163 140 10 13 1 1

% 100% 85.9% 6.1% 8.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Relevant Pool

Qualified

Selected

Relevant Pool


Qualified

Selected

Qualified

Selected

Dispatching (2151)

Relevant Pool


Relevant Pool

Selected

Geology (1350)

Qualified

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 245 230 7 8 2 2

% 100% 93.9% 2.9% 3.3% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 3498 3207 87 204 29 5 2 9 8 5

% 100% 91.7% 2.5% 5.8% 0.8% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 10 10

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 325 279 17 29 2 1 1

% 100% 85.8% 5.2% 8.9% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 4 4

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 93 77 5 11

% 100% 82.8% 5.4% 11.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 1 1

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 115 91 9 15 2 1 1

% 100% 79.1% 7.8% 13.0% 1.7% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Park Ranger (0025)

Qualified


Qualified

Selected


Qualified

Selected

Relevant Pool

Relevant Pool




Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

(82)

EpilepsyApplicants

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

Selected

Selected


Relevant Pool

Relevant Pool

Qualified

Park Ranger (0025)




Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

(82)

EpilepsyApplicants

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 160 152 2 6

% 100% 95.0% 1.3% 3.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 3441 3160 79 202 21 2 3 3 13

% 100% 91.8% 2.3% 5.9% 0.6% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0%

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 75 73 1 1

% 100% 97.3% 1.3% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 897 851 21 25 2 1 1

% 100% 94.9% 2.3% 2.8% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 84 84

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 920 877 16 27 2 1 1

% 100% 95.3% 1.7% 2.9% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0%

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 72 68 1 3 1 1

% 100% 94.4% 1.4% 4.2% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 1.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 908 818 29 61 8 3 4 1

% 100% 90.1% 3.2% 6.7% 0.9% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1%

Selected


Qualified

Selected

Relevant Pool


Qualified

Qualified

Selected

Relevant Pool

Relevant Pool

Relevant Pool


Qualified

Selected


Park Ranger (0025)




Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

(82)

EpilepsyApplicants

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 4 3 1

% 100% 75.0% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 199 162 10 27 1 1

% 100% 81.4% 5.0% 13.6% 0.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0%

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 17 16 1

% 100% 94.1% 0.0% 5.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 286 263 5 18

% 100% 92.0% 1.7% 6.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 7 7

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 275 256 4 15 1 1

% 100% 93.1% 1.5% 5.5% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4%

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 49 45 2 2

% 100% 91.8% 4.1% 4.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1360 1291 21 48 3 3

% 100% 94.9% 1.5% 3.5% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


Qualified

Relevant Pool

Selected

Qualified

Selected

Relevant Pool

Relevant Pool

Relevant Pool

Geophysics (1313)

Qualified

Selected

Selected

Hydrology (1315)


Qualified

Park Ranger (0025)




Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

(82)

EpilepsyApplicants

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 23 21 2

% 100% 91.3% 8.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 808 733 30 45 5 2 3

% 100% 90.7% 3.7% 5.6% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0%

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 32 27 1 4

% 100% 84.4% 3.1% 12.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 743 677 22 44 3 1 2

% 100% 91.1% 3.0% 5.9% 0.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 30 30

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 550 519 21 10 1 1

% 100% 94.4% 3.8% 1.8% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%

Applied #

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 6 5 1

% 100% 83.3% 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 163 140 10 13 1 1

% 100% 85.9% 6.1% 8.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%


Qualified

Selected

Geology (1350)

Qualified

Relevant Pool

Selected

Qualified

Selected

Relevant Pool

Relevant Pool

Relevant Pool


Qualified

Selected

Dispatching (2151)

# 6210 5313 366 531 61 4 6 4 8 4 6 29

% 100% 85.6% 5.9% 8.6% 1.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0%

# 658 579 25 54 5 1 1 1 2

% 100% 88.0% 3.8% 8.2% 0.8% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%

# 458 420 11 27 7 1 1 5

% 100% 91.7% 2.4% 5.9% 1.5% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 1.1% 0.0%

# 987 903 17 67 11 1 1 3 3 3

% 100% 91.5% 1.7% 6.8% 1.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%

13 - 24 months

1 - 12 months

25+ months

Time in grade in excess of minimum

Total Employees Eligible for

Career Ladder Promotions

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism


Table B10: NON-COMPETITIVE PROMOTIONS - TIME IN GRADE by Disability - Permanent Workforce

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(82)

Epilepsy

(16-18)

Deafness

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 460 421 13 26 3 1 1 1

% 100% 91.5% 2.8% 5.7% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.2% 0.2%

# 9484 8501 289 694 67 7 4 3 12 6 10 22 3

% 100% 89.6% 3.0% 7.3% 0.7% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 277 260 9 8 2 2

% 100% 93.9% 3.2% 2.9% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 6974 6318 213 443 53 2 4 5 12 5 8 16 1

% 100% 90.6% 3.1% 6.4% 0.8% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 89 83 3 3

% 100% 93.3% 3.4% 3.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 3632 3287 120 225 24 5 2 5 3 9

% 100% 90.5% 3.3% 6.2% 0.7% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

#

% - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

# 21 21

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 1819 1663 51 105 4 1 1 1 1

% 100% 91.4% 2.8% 5.8% 0.2% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1%

Selected

GS-15 Vacancies

Applied

Relevant Pool

Applied

GS-14 Vacancies

Applied

Qualified

Selected

Relevant Pool

Relevant Pool

Qualified

Selected

Senior Executive Service Vacancies

Applied

Qualified

Selected

Relevant Pool

GS-13 Vacancies

Qualified


Table B11: INTERNAL SELECTIONS FOR SENIOR LEVEL POSITIONS (GS 13 - 15 AND SES) - Distribution by Disability Permanent Workforce

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

(82)

EpilepsyApplicants

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

# 5192 4473 194 525 63 8 6 7 7 7 4 2 21 1

% 100% 86.2% 3.7% 10.1% 1.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.4% 0.0%

Total Hours 32992 28535 1257 3200 375 49 34 48 40 44 16 16 120 8

Average Hours 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 6 6 4 8 6 8

# 11644 10299 358 987 137 13 9 2 29 3 24 7 47 3

% 100% 88.4% 3.1% 8.5% 1.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.1% 0.4% 0.0%

Total Hours 290863 256688 8991 25184 3559 322 254 41 750 60 670 159 1231 72

Average Hours 25 25 25 26 26 25 28 21 26 20 28 23 26 24

# 10217 8751 410 1056 138 17 13 8 28 7 16 9 38 2

% 100% 85.7% 4.0% 10.3% 1.4% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.3% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.4% 0.0%

Total Amount $3,837,064 $3,296,384 $150,069 $390,611 $50,939 $6,535 $5,193 $3,060 $9,792 $2,732 $5,521 $3,336 $13,870 $900

Average Amount $376 $377 $366 $370 $369 $384 $399 $383 $350 $390 $345 $371 $365 $450

# 32112 28781 1005 2326 246 31 23 15 47 12 36 1 73 8

% 100% 89.6% 3.1% 7.2% 0.8% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0%

Total Amount $41,445,614 $37,327,880 $1,292,779 $2,824,955 $282,208 $29,291 $31,860 $17,449 $54,005 $13,073 $43,853 $1,000 $82,650 $9,027

Average Amount $1,291 $1,297 $1,286 $1,215 $1,147 $945 $1,385 $1,163 $1,149 $1,089 $1,218 $1,000 $1,132 $1,128

# 145 128 4 13

% 100% 88.3% 2.8% 9.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Total Amount $1,597,860 $1,378,267 $94,846 $124,747

Average Amount $11,020 $10,768 $23,712 $9,596 - - - - - - - - - -

# 1643 1497 39 107 11 1 2 3 5

% 100% 91.1% 2.4% 6.5% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.3% 0.0%

Total Benefit $4,327,881 $3,958,836 $102,798 $266,247 $26,134 $2,754 $4,303 $5,725 $13,352

Average Benefit $2,634 $2,645 $2,636 $2,488 $2,376 - - - $2,754 $2,152 $1,908 - $2,670 -


Given


Given

Total Cash Awards Given



Total QSIs Awarded

Time-Off awards - 9+ hours

Cash Awards - $100 - $500

Cash Awards $501+

Quality Step Increases (QSI)

Senior Executive Service Performance Awards

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

Time-Off awards - 1-9 hours

Type of Award


Table B13: EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION AND AWARDS - Distribution by Disability - Permanent Workforce

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

# 4609 3864 236 509 65 6 7 5 11 1 10 2 23

% 100% 83.8% 5.1% 11.0% 1.4% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0%

# 165 119 18 28 1 1

% 100% 72.1% 10.9% 17.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 4 4

% 100% 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

# 4778 3987 254 537 66 6 8 5 11 1 10 2 23

% 100% 83.4% 5.3% 11.2% 1.4% 0.1% 0.2% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.0% 0.5% 0.0%

# 54033 47575 1900 4558 595 73 51 31 105 21 85 32 184 13

% 100% 88.0% 3.5% 8.4% 1.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.2% 0.0% 0.2% 0.1% 0.3% 0.0%

Type of Separation

Voluntary

Involuntary

Total Permanent Workforce

(09/30/2014)

Total Separations

RIF


Table B14: SEPARATIONS By Type of Separation- Distribution by Disability - Permanent Workforce

Total


(04, 05)

No

Disability

(06-94)

Reportable

Disability

Targeted

Disability

(21, 23, 25)

Blindness

(91)

Psychiatric

Disability

(92)

Distortion of

Limb/Spine,

Dwarfism

(90)

Severe

Intellectual

Disability

(01)

Not

Identified

(64-69)

Partial

Paralysis

(71-79)

Total

Paralysis

(82)

Epilepsy

(16-18)

Deafness

(28,30,32-38)

Missing

Extremities