160

REFERENCES

161

REFERENCES

ACS Chemistry Major. (2011). Five-Year Departmental Assessment Plan for

Undergraduate Programs in Chemistry. Department of Chemistry California

State University, Bakersfield. agebauer@csub.edu.

Aiken, L. R. (1996). Tests Psicológicosy Evaluación, México. Prentice Hall.

Akturk, A. O., & Sahin, I. (2011). Literature Review on Metacognition and its

Measurement. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences.

www.sciencedirect.com. 3731–3736

Alberta. (2003). Classroom assessment tool kit for the Information and

Communication Technology (ICT). Program of studies: grades 1–6. www.

learning. gov. ab. ca/k-12/ curriculum.

Alexander, P. A.‚ & Winne, P. H. (2006). Handbook of Educational Psychology

(2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Earlbaum.

Allen, R. (1996). Performance Assessment. Wisconsin Education Association

Council. Retrieved from http://www.weac.org/resource/may96/perform.htm.

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, &

National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for

Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: American

Educational Research Association.

Andrade, H.‚ & Du, Y. (2005). Student perspectives on rubric-referenced assessment.

Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, University at Albany, 10(3),

1531-7714.

Ashwin, P. (2008). Accounting for structure and agency in close up research on

teaching, learning and assessment in higher education. International Journal

of Education Research, 47, 151-158.

Attar Khamene, F.‚ & Seif, A. (2011). Effect of teaching meta-cognition approaches

of reading on the motivation and educational progress of students. Journal of

Educational Psychology studies. 5(12)‚ 2228-6683.

Au, K. H., & Jordan, C. (1981). Teaching reading to Hawaiian children: Finding a

culturally appropriate solution. In H. Trueba, G. P. Guthrie, & K. H. Au

162

(Eds.), Culture in the bilingual classroom: Studies in classroom ethnography

(pp. 139-152). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Azer, S. (2009). Problem-based learning in the Fifth, sixth and seventh grades:

Assessment of students' perceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25,

1033-1042.

Bachman, L. F. (2002). Some reflections on task-based language performance

assessment. Language Testing, 19, 453-476.

Bagnato, S. (2007). Authentic Assessment for early childhood intervention: Best

practices. New York: The Guilford Press.

Bailery, M.‚ & Tuohy, D. (2009). Student horses experiences of experiences of using

a learning content as a method of assessment. Nurse Education. 29, 758-762.

Baker, E. L.‚ & O'neil, H. F. (1994) Performance assessment and equity: a view from

the USA, Assessment in Education, 1, 11-26.

Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development andfunctioning.

Educ. Psychol. 28: 117-148.

Bedir, A., Polat, M.‚ & Sakacı, T. (2009). 7.sınıf fen ve teknoloji dersine ait bir

uygulama çalışması: Portfolyo [Performance application of the 7th grade

science and technology course: Portfolio]. C.B.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 5 (1),

45-58.

Bennett, R. E.‚ & Gitomer, D. H. (2008). Transforming K-12 Assessment: Integrating

Accountability Testing, Formative Assessment and Professional Support. In C.

Wyatt-Smith & J. Cumming (Eds.), Educational assessment in the21st

century. New York: Springer.

Berk, R. A. (Ed.). (1986). Performance assessment. Baltimore, MD: jons Hopkins

University press.

Birgin, O. (2008). Alternatif bir değerlendirme yöntemi olarak portfolyo

değerlendirme uygulamasına ilişkin öğrenci görüşleri [Students‘ views on

portfolio application as an alternative assessment method]. Türk Eğitim

Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(1), 1-24.

163

Black, P., Wiliam, D., Lee, C. & Harrison, C. (2004). Teachers developing

assessment for learning: impact on student achievement. Assessment in

Education, 11(1), 49-65.

Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B. & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for

learning: Putting it into practice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

Black, P., & William, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through

classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 139-148.

Bloxham, S., & Boyd, P. (2007). Developing Effective Assessment in Higher

Education: a practical guide. Berkshire: Open University Press McGraw-Hill

Education.

Bonk, W. J.‚ & Ockey, G. J. (2003). A Many-facet Rasch analysis of the second

language group oral discussion task. Language Testing, 20(1), 89-110.

Boud, D. (2010). Assessment 2020: Seven propositions for assessment reform in

higher education. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.

Boud, D. (1990). Assessment and the promotion of academic Studies in Higher

Education, 15(1).

Brandt, R. (1998). Foreword. In G. Wiggins and J. McTighe, Understanding by

Design (pp. v-vi). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and

Curriculum Development.

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain,

mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Brennan, R., & Johnson, E. (1995). Generalizability of performance assessments.

Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 14(4), 9–12, 27.

Brown, A. (2005). Self-Assessment of writing in independent language learning

programs: The value of annotated samples. Assessment Writing. 174- 191.

Brown, G. T. L. (2003). Teachers‘ instructional conceptions: assessment's relationship

to learning, teaching, curriculum, and teacher efficacy. Paper presented to the

Joint Conference of the Australian and New Zealand Associations for

Research in Education (AARE/NZARE), Auckland, NZ, November 28 to

164

December 3, 2003. Retrieved 25 August, 2009 from

www.aare.edu.au/03pap/bro03022.pdf.

Brown, J. S., Collins, A.‚ & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of

Learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-41.

Brown‚ AL (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more

mysterious mechanisms. In: Weinert F, Kluwe R (eds) Metacognition,

motivation, and understanding, Erlbaum: Hillsdate NJ, 65-116.

Brown, AL., Branford, JD., Ferrara, RA., & Champione, JC. (1983). Learning,

remembering, and understanding. In: Flavell JH, Markman EM (eds)

Handbook of child psychology. 3, 77-166.

Brualdi, A. (1998). Implementing Performance Assessment in the Classroom.

Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 6(2). Retrieved August 7, 2008,

from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=6&n=2.

Buoncristiani, P., & Buoncristiani, M.(2008). Deconstructing Metacognition,

Thinking and Learning in Concert.6 http://ThinkingAndLearning

InConcert.org.

Business Higher Education Forum. (2007). Spanning the chasm: Corporate and

academic cooperation to improve work-force preparation. Retrieved on

January 21, 2008, from http://www.bhef.com/publications/spanning the chasm

task force on high performance work and workers the academic

connection.pdf.

Butler, S. M.‚ & McMunn, N. D. (2006). Understanding and using assessment to

improve student learning. CA: Jossey- Bass.

Calfee, R.‚ & Perfumo, P. (1993). Student portfolios: Opportunities for a revolution in

assessment. Journal of Reading, 36(7), 532-537.

California State Board of Education. (1990). Science frameworks for California

public schools, kindergarten to grade twelve. Sacramento, CA: California

State Board of Education.

165

Calma, A. (2010). Teaching and Learning Unit: Staff Development Guides for

academics in the Faculty of Business and Economics: Authentic Assessment.

http://tlu.fbe.unimelb.edu.au.

Case, J., Gunstone, R., & Lewis, A. (2001). Students' metacognitive development in

an innovative second year chemical engineering course. Research in Science

Education, 31, 313-335.

Chalmers, C. (2009). Developing Primary Students‘ Group Metacognitive Processes

in a Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Environment. Ph.D. thesis.

The university of Queensland. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/29819/1.

Chari, H., Samavi, A., & Kordestani, D. (2010). Analyzing and comparison on

psychological aspects of questionnaire of strategies of metacognition of

reading in high school students. Journal of Psychological Studies. 3386-1735.

Chaung, Y. Y. (2009). A Study of Performance-based Assessment for Taiwanese

College EFL Students. Englishes and Literatures-in-English in a Globalised

World: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on English in

Southeast Asia (pp. 191-204). Singapore: National Institute of Education,

Nanyang Technological University. www.cuhk.edu.hk/rao/research.

Chaung, Y. Y. (2009). A Study of Performance-based Assessment for Taiwanese

College EFL Students. Englishes and Literatures-in-English in a Globalised

World: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on English in

Southeast Asia (pp. 191-204). Singapore: National Institute of Education,

Nanyang Technological University. www.cuhk.edu.hk/rao/research

Chen D, Singer, R. (1992). Self-regulation and cognitive strategies in sport

participation. Int. J. Sport Psychol. 23‚ 277-300.

Child, D. (1973/2004): Psychology and the Teacher, London/New York, Continuum,

359-389.

Chisholm, J. M. (1999). The Effects of Metacognition, Criticai Thinking, Gender, and

Gender Role Identification on Academic Achievement in the Middle Years.

Ph.D. thesis. University of Mount Saint Vincent at Halifax, Nova Scotia.

prr.hec.gov.pk/Chapters/726S-B.pdf.

166

Choi, J. Y. (2006). "Metacognitive Evaluation Method in Consecutive Interpretation

for Novice Learners". Translators' Journal. V(2)‚273-283.

http://id.erudit.org/iderudit/013256ar.

Chuang, Y. Y. (2007). A study of college English teachers‗ preferences and

perceptions of using the types of tasks for assessing Taiwanese EFL students‗

foreign language oral proficiency. Journal of Applied Foreign Languages, 8,

40-77.

Cizek, G. J. (1993). Reconsidering standards and criteria. Journal of Educational

measurement, 30, 93-106.

Clarke, David J. (1992). Activating assessment alternatives in mathematics.

Arithmetic Teacher, 59(6), 24-29.

Cohen, L., & Manion, L.(2000). Research methods in education(5td Ed). London:

Routledge.

Cooper, B., & Cowie, B. (2010). Collaborative research for assessment for learning.

Teaching and Teacher education, 26, 979-986.

Cooper, M. M., Sandi-Urena, S., & Stevens, R. (2008). Reliable multi method

assessment of metacognition use in chemistry problem solving. Chemistry

Education Research and Practice. DOI: 10.1039/b801287n.

Cooper, S. S. (2004). Metacognition in the adult leaner. Unpublished master's thesis,

Weber State University, Ogden, UT. Retrieved May 31, 2007, from http:www.

lifecircles-inc.com/metacognition.htm.

Costa, A. L.‚ & Kallick, B. (2007). ―Habits of Mind‖, in preparation.

www.d.umn.edu/~dglisczi/4501web/.../A1HabitsofMind.doc.

Coutinho, S. A. (2007). The relationship between goals, metacognition, and academic

success. Educate Journal. 7(1), 39-47.

Cremin, L. (1961). The transformation of the school: Progressivism in American

education, 1876-1957. New York: Vintage Books.

Crews‚ D.J. (1993). Self-regulation strategies in sport and exercise. In: Singer RN,

Murphey M, Tennant LK (eds) Handbook of research on sport psychology,

Macmillan: New York, 557-568.

167

Cross, D. R.‚ & Paris, S. G. (1988). Developmental and instructional analyses of

children‘s metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational

Psychology, 80(2), 131-142.

Cubukcu, F. (2008). Enhancing vocabulary development and reading comprehension

through metacognitive strategies. Educational Research, 18(1).

Cunliffe, L. (2005). The problematic relationship between knowing how and knowing

that in secondary art education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(4), 547-556.

Darling-Hammond, L., Barron, B., Cervetti, G., Pearson, P. D., Schoenfeld, A. H.,

Stage, E. K. (2008). Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for

understanding. San Francisco; Jossey-Bass.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in

context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 23.

Davidowitz, B., & Rollnick, M. (2003). Enabling metacognition in the laboratory: A

case study of four second year university chemistry students. Research in

Science Education, 33, 43-69.

Davis, K. (2003). Multiple analysis of variance (MANOVA) or multiple analysis of

covariance (MANCOVA). Louisiana State University.

Dawson, T. L. (2008). Metacognition and learning in adulthood. Developmental

Testing Service, LLC. http:devtestservice.com.

Dearnley, C.‚ & Matthew, B. (2007). Factors that contribute to undergraduate student

success. Teaching in Higher Education, 12, 377-391.

Dembo, M. H. (1994). Applying educational psychology (5th

ed). New York: Long-

man.

Doane, W. E. J., Rice, R., & Zachos, P. A. (2006). Knowing when you don‘t know.

The Science Teacher 73(4): 46–49.

Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999). The Use of Self-, Peer and Co-

assessment in Higher Education: a review. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3),

331-350.

168

Doris, B. (1993). Authentic performance assessment. Childhood Education. Available

on free library.

Downing, S. (2006). Twelve steps for effective test development. In S. Downing& T.

Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 3–25). Mahwah, NJ:

Erlbaum.

Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., & Kruger, J. (2003) Why people fail to

recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological

Science 12, 3, 83-87.

Efklides, A. (2001). Metacognitive experiences in problem solving: metacognition,

motivation, and self-regulation. In: Efklides A, Kuhl J, Sorrentino RM (eds)

Trends and prospects in motivation research, Kluwer: Dordrecht The

Netherlands, 297-323.

Elwood, J. (2006). Views of assessment, learning and mind: exploring the links and

the implications for emerging trends and perspectives in assessment.

International Association for Educational Assessment, Singapore.

www.iaea.info/documents/paper_1162a20d9b.pdf.

Engqvist, L. (2005). The mistreatment of covariate interaction terms in linear model

analyses of behavioural and evolutionary ecology studies. Animal Behaviour,

70, 967–971.

Erdogan, T., & Yurdabaka, I. (2011). SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS‘

OPINIONS ON PORTFOLIO ASSESSMENT IN EFL. 2nd International

Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications 27-29 April,

2011 Antalya-Turkey www.iconte.org.

Erskine, D. L. (2009). Effect of Prompted Reflection and Metacognitive Skill

Instruction on University Freshmen‘s use of Metacognition. Ph.D. thesis.

Brigham Young University, http://udini.proquest.com.

Ferrari, M., Pinard, A., Reid, L., & Bouffard-Bouchard, T. (1991). The relationship

between expertise and self-regulation in movement performance: some

theoretical issues. Percept. Mot. Skills 72‚ 139-150.

169

Feuer, M., & Fulton, K. (1993). The many faces of performance assessment. Phi

Delta Kappan, 74(6), 478.

Fitzpatrick, R., & Morrison, E. (1971). Performance and product evaluation. In R.

Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement (pp. 237–270). Washington, DC:

American Council of Education.

Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of

metacognition. In: Weinert F, Kluwe R (eds) Metacognition, motivation, and

understanding, Erlbaum: Hillsdale NJ, 21-29.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of

cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.

Ford, K. J., Smith, E. M., Weissbein, D. A., Gully, S. M., & Salas, E. (1998).

Relationships of goal orientation, metacognitive activity, and practice

strategies with learning outcomes and transfer. J. Appl. Psychol. 83‚ 218-233.

Fortune, J., & Cromack, T. (1995). Developing and using clinical examination. In J.

Impara (Ed.), Licensure testing: Purposes, procedures, and practices (pp.

149–165). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement.

Fox, R. (2001). Constructivism examined. Oxf. Rev. Educ. 27‚24-35.

Francisco, J. S., & Nicoll, G. (1998). Integrating multiple teaching methods into a

general chemistry classroom. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(2), 210-213.

Frederiksen, J. R.‚ & Collins, A. (1989). A systems approach to educational testing.

Educational Researcher, 18(9), 27-32.

Frederiksen, J. R., & White, B. Y. (1997). Reflective assessment of students‘ research

within an inquiry-based middle school science curriculum. Paper presented at

the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association,

Chicago.

French, A.‚ Macedo, M.‚ Poulsen, J.‚ Waterson, T.‚ & Yu, A. (2010). Multivariate

analysis of variance (MANOVA).

http://userwww.sfsu.edu/~efc/classes /biol710/manova/MANOVAnewest.pdf.

170

Frisby, C. L. (2001) Academic achievement. In L. A. Suzuki, J. G. Ponterotto, & P. J.

Meller(Eds.), Handbook of multicultural assessment(2nd ed., pp. 541-568).

San Francisco: Jossey- Bass.

Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of mind. 4th ed. New York: Basic Books.

Garner‚ R., & Alexander‚ P. (1989). Metacognition: answered and unanswered

questions. Educ. Psychol. 24‚143-158.

Georghiades‚ P. (2000). Beyond conceptual change learning in science education:

focusing on transfer, durability and metacognition, Educ. Res., 42, 119-139.

Gewertz, C. (2008). States Press Ahead on ‗21st-Century Skills.‘ Education Week,

28(8), 21-23.

Ghiasvand, M. Y. (2010). Relationship between learning strategies and academic

achievement; based on information processing approach. Procedia Social and

Behavioral Sciences. 5 (2010) 1033–1036. www.sciencedirect.com.

Goldin, G. (1992). Towards an assessment framework for school mathematics. In R.

Lesh & S. Lamon (Eds.), Assessment of authentic performance in school

mathematics (pp. 63-88). Washington, DC: American Association for the

Advancement of Science.

Gomez, E. (2000). Assessment portfolios: Including English language learners in

large-scale assessments. ERIC Digest based on article published by the

Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratory at Brown University

in "Perspectives on Policy and Practice" (March 1999). (ERIC Document

Reproduction Service No. ED447725).

Gong, B., & Reidy, E. (1996). Assessment and accountability in Kentucky‘s school

reform. In J. Baron & D. Wolf (Eds.), Performance-based student assessment:

Challenges and possibilities (pp. 215–233). Chicago: National Society for the

Study of Education.

Gonzales, P., Guzmلn, J., Partelow, L., Pahlke, E., Jocelyn, L., & Kastberg, D.

(2004). Highlights from the trends in international mathematics and science

study (TIMSS) 2003 (NCES 2005–005). Washington, DC: U.S. Government

Printing Office.

171

Gott, S. P., Lesgold, A., & Kane, R. S. (1996). Tutoring for transfer of technical

competence. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist Learning Environments:

Case Studies in Instructional Design (pp. 33-48). New Jersey: Educational

Technology Publications.

Graff, G. (2009). Why Assessment? Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching

Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 10(1), 153-165.

Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. J. (2011). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh:

Analyzing and Understanding Data (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:

Prentice Hall.

Gregory, T., David, A., & Samson, N. (2008). Development of annstrument Designed

to Investigate Elements of Science Students‘ Metacognition, Self-Efficacy and

Learning Processes: The SEMLI-S I. International Journal of Science

Education‚30(13),1701–1724.

Gronlund, N. (2006). Assessment of student achievement (8th ed.). Boston: Allyn &

Bacon.Jakwerth, P. (1999). TIMMS performance assessment results: United

States. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 25, 277–281.

Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). Perceptions of

Authentic Assessment: Five Dimensions of Authenticity. Paper presented at the

Second Biannual Joint Northumbria/European Association for Research on

Learning and Instruction SIG Assessment Conference, Bergen, Norway.

Retrieved December 7, 2008, from http://www.ou.nl/Doc/Expertise/OTEC.

Gullickson, A. K. (2003). The student evaluation standards. Thousand Ouks, CA:

corwin.

Haefner, T. (2004). Assessment as a magnification of internal, parallel, and external

reflection. Action in Teacher Education, 25(4), 14-19.

Haladyna, T. M., Nolen, S. B., & Haas, N. S. (1991). Raising Standardized

Achievement Test Scores and the Origins of Test Score Pollution. Educational

Researcher, 20(5), 2-7.

172

Hale, M. (1982). History of employment testing. In A. Wigdor & W. Garner(Eds.),

Ability testing: Uses, consequences, and controversies. Part II:

Documentation section (pp. 3–38). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Haller, E., Child, D., & Walberg, H. (1988). Can comprehension be taught? Educ.

Res. 7: 5-8.

Hamayan, E. V., & Damico, J. S. (1991). Limiting bias in the assessment of bilingual

students. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

Hamilton, L. S. (1994). Validating hands-on science assessments through an

investigation of response process. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of

the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC

Document Reproduction Service No. ED376202).

Hart, D. (1994). Authentic assessment. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.

Hartman, H. J. (2001). Developing students' metacognitive knowledge and skills. In

H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in Learning and Instruction: Theory,

Research and Practice (pp. 33 - 63). Boston: Kluwer.

Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and

classrooms. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Herman, J. L., Klein, D., Heath, T.M., & Wakai, S. T. (1994). A first look: Are claims

for alternative assessment holding up? (CSE Tech. Rep. No. 391). Los Angles:

University of California, Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and

student Testing.

Herman, J. L., Aschbacher, P. R., & Winters, L. (1992). A Practical Guide to

Alternative Assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and

Curriculum Development‚ 2.

Herrington, J., & Herrington, A. (1998). Authentic Assessment and Multimedia: How

University Students Respond to a Model of Authentic Assessment [Electronic

version]. Higher Education Research and Development, 17(3), 305-322.

Retrieved November 6, 2008, from http://adserver2.uow.edu.au

Hoffmann, D. J. (2000). Metacognition and multiplicity: The arts as models and

agents. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 339-359.

173

Hollingworth, R. W., & McLoughlin, C. M. (2000). Developing First Year Science

Students‘ Problem Solving Skills: Can We Do it Online? Online Learning

Environment. www.ascilite.org.au results

Howell, D. C. (2009) Statistical methods for psychology (7th ed.). Belmont: Cengage

Wadsworth.

Jacobs, G. M. (2004). A Classroom Investigation of the Growth of Metacognitive

Awareness in Kindergarten Children through the Writing Process. Early

Childhood Education Journal, 32(1).

James, R., McInnis, C., Devlin, M. (2002). Assessing Learning in Australian

Universities. Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of

Melbourne. www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au/assessinglearning

Javadi, M., Keyvanara, M., Yaghobi, M., Hassanzadeh, A., & Ebadi, Z. (2010). The

Relationship between Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies and

Students‘ Academic Status in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.Iranian

Journal of Education in health science‚ 3(10). 246- 254.

Johanson, G., & Motlomelo, S. (1998). An item format continuum for classroom

assessment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American

Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.

Joughin, G. (2010). The hidden curriculum revisited: a critical review of research into

the influence of summative assessment on learning. Assessment & Evaluation

in Higher Education, 35(3), 335–345.

Kabba, C. (2008). Tips and Techniques for Creative Teaching. Goddard College in

Plainfield, Vermont, 1.

Kahl, S. (2008). The Assessment of 21st Century Skills: Something Old, Something

New, Something Borrowed. Paper presented at the Council of Chief State

School Officers 38th National Conference on Student Assessment, Orlando,

FL.

Kearney, S. P.‚ & Perkins‚ T. (2011). Developing Students' Capacity for Innovation,

Creativity and Critical Thinking through Contemporary forms of Assessment.

174

Proceedings of the 9th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Education

2011. CD ROM (ISSN# 1541 - 5880,p.75).http://www.hiceducation.org.

Kearney, S. P.‚ & Perkins‚ T. (2010). Developing students‘ capacity for innovation,

creativity and critical thinking through contemporary forms of assessment: a

case study in progress. Paper presented at ATN Assessment Conference,

University of Technology, Sydney.

Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (3rd ed.).

Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Khabiri, P. (1993). The role of metacognition, effort and worry in math problem

solving requiring problem translation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,

University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

Khattri, N., Reeve, A., & Kane, M. (1998). Principles and practices of performance

assessment. Manwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Knapp, J., &

Knapp, L. (1995). Practice analysis: Building the foundation for validity. In J.

Impara (Ed.), Licensure testing: Purposes, procedures, and practices (pp. 93–

116). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement.

Khoramde, K.‚ Sajadian, P., Bahrami, F., & Zangene, S. (2012). Validation of the

Meta-cognitions Questionnaire—Adolescent Version (MCQ-A) in an Iranian

sample and compare of met cognitive beliefs between adolescents with anxiety

disorders and normal sample. Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical

science.7977-53.

Klassen, S. (2006). Contextual assessment in science education: Background, issues

and policy. Science Education, 90(5), 820–851.

Klein, S. P., Jovanovic, J., Stecher, B. M., McCaffrey, D., Shavelson, R. J., Haertel,

E., Solano-Flores, G., & Comfort, K. (1997). Gender and racial/ethnic

differences on performance assessments in science. Educational Evaluation

and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 83-97.

Kolls, M. (1992). Portfolio assessment: A feasibility study. Paper presented at the

annual meeting of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages,

Vancouver, B.C., Canada.

175

Koretz, D., Stecher, B., Klein, S., & McCaffrey, D. (1994). The Vermont portfolio

assessment program: Findings and implications. Educational Measurement:

Issues and Practice, 13(3), 5–16.

Korn, E. L., & Graubard, B. I. (2000). Analysis of Health Surveys, Wiley‚1.

Kosmicki, J. (1993). The effect of differential test instructions on math achievement,

effort, and worry of community college students. Unpublished doctoral

dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles.

Kuhn, D.‚ & Dean, D. (2004). A bridge between cognitive psychology and

educational practice. Theory into Practice, 43(4), 268-273.

Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological

Science, 9(5), 178-181.

Kulieke, M., Bakker, J., Collins, C., Fennimore, T., Fine, C., Herman, J., Jones, B. F.,

Raack, L., & Tinzmann, M.B. (1990). Why should assessment be based on a

vision of learning? [online document] NCREL, Oak Brook: IL. Available

online: http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/rpl_esys/assess.htm.

Lai, E. R. (2011). Metacognition: A Literature Review. Research Report.

http://www.pearsonassessments.com/research.

Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven,

CT: Yale University Press.

Lamprianou, I., & Athanasou, J., A. (2009). A Teacher‘s Guide to Educational

Assessment. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

Lane, S. (2010). Performance assessment: The state of the art. (SCOPE Student

Performance Assessment Series). Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford

Center for Opportunity Policy in Education.

Lane, S., & Stone, C. (2006). Performance assessment. In R. Brennan (Ed.),

Educational measurement (4th ed., pp. 387–431). Westport, CT: American

Council on Education and Praeger.

176

Lane, S., Parke, C. S., & Stone, C. A. (2002). The Impact of a State Performance-

Based Assessment and Accountability Program on Mathematics Instruction

and Student Learning: Evidence from Survey Data and School Performance.

Educational Assessment, 8(4), 279-315.

Leader, W. S. (2008). Metacognition among Students Identified as Gifted or

Nongifted Using the Discover Assessment. Unpublished Doctoral

Dissertation. Tucson, AZ: Graduate College of the University of Arizona.

Leamnson, R. (1999). Thinking about teaching and learning: Developing habits of

learning with first year college and university students. Sterling, VA: Stylus.

Lefranciois, G. R. (2000).Psychology for teaching (10th

ed.). Wadsworth.

LeMahieu, P., Gitomer, D., & Eresh, J. (1995). Portfolios in large-scale assessment:

Difficult but not impossible. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice,

14(3), 11–16, 25–28.

Lingtan, A.‚ & Towndrow, P. (2009). Catalyzing student- teacher interactions and

teacher learning in science practical formative assessment with digital video

technology. Teaching and Teacher Edycation‚ 25, 61-65.

Linn, R. L. (1993). Educational assessment: Expanded expectations and challenges.

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 1-16.

Liskin-Gasparro, J. (1997). Comparing Traditional and Performance-Based

Assessment. Paper presented at the Symposium on Spanish Second Language

Acquisition, Austin, TX. Retrieved December 30, 2008, from

http://sedl.org/loteced/comparing_assessment.html

Lombardi, M.M. (2008). Making the Grade: The Role of Assessment in Authentic

Learning. Educause learning initiative. Advancing learning through it

innovation. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0.

Lovrich, D. (2004). A ladder of thinking. The Science Teacher, 71(4), 56 - 59.

Lubezky, A., Dori, J.Y., & Zoller, U. (2004). Hocs- promoting assessment on

environment-related undergraduate chemistry. Chemistry Education: Research

and Practice‚ 5 (2), 175-184.

177

Luca, J., McMahon, M. (2004). Promoting metacognition through negotiated

assessment. In R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, D. Jonas-Dwyer & R. Phillips (Eds),

Beyond the comfort zone: Proceedings of the 21st ASCILITE Conference (pp.

562-570). Perth, 5-8 December.

http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth04/procs/luca.html.

Lukhele, R., Thissen, D., & Wainer, H. (1993). On the relative value of multiple-

choice, constructed-response, and examinee-selected items on two

achievement tests. Program Statistics Research Technical Report No. 93-28.

Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

Lumley, T. (2002). Assessment criteria in a large-scale writing test: What do they

really mean to raters? Language Testing, 19, 246-276.

Madaus, G. F., & O‘Dwyer, L. M. (1999). A short history of performance assessment:

Lessons learned. Phi Delta Kappan, 688-695.

Mahajan, D. S.‚ Singh, G. S. (2005). Instructional Strategies in Organic Chemistry

Teaching: Perception of Science and Agriculture Undergraduate students in

Botswana, Education, 123(4), 714.

Maher, C.A., Davis, R.B., & Alston, A. (1992). A teacher's struggle to assess student

cognitive growth. In R. Lesh & S. Lamon (Eds.), Assessment of authentic

performance in school mathe- matics (pp. 249-264). Washington, DC:

American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Manitoba Education, Citizenship and Youth. (2003). Independent Together:

Supporting the Multilevel Learning Community. Winnipeg, MB: Manitoba

Education, Citizenship and youth.

Maqsud, M. (1997). Effects of metacognitive skills and nonverbal ability397.

Martinez, M. E. (2006). What is metacognition? Phi Delta Kappan, 696-699.

Martinez, M. E., & Katz, I. R. (1996). Cognitive processing requirements of

constructed figural response and multiplechoice items in architecture

assessment. Educational Assessment, 3(1), 83-98.

178

Marzano.R .(1998). Checking for understanding and encouraging Meta cognition

.Intel. education: Assessing projects:Using Assessment to improve teaching

and learning. www. educate.intel.com.

McBrien, J. L., & Brandt, R. S. (1997). The language of learning: A guide to

education terms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum

Development.

McCormick, C. B. (2006). Metacognition and learning. In P. A. Alexander, & P. H.

Winne (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 79-102).

Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

McNamara, T. F. (1996). Measuring second language performance. London:

Longman.

McTighe, J., & Ferrara, S. (1998). Assessing learning in the classroom. Washington,

DC: National Education Association.

Mehrens, W. A. (1991). Defensible/Indefensible Instructional Preparation for High

Stakes Achievement Tests: An Exploratory Trialogue. Paper presented at the

Annual Meetings of the Educational Research Association and the National

Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago, IL.

Meloth, M. S. (1990). Changes in poor readers‘ knowledge of cognition and the

association of knowledge of cognition with regulation of cognition and

reading comprehension. J. Educ. Psychol. 82‚ 99-105.

Messick, S. (1994). The interplay of evidence and consequence in the validation of

performance assessments. Educational Researcher, 23(2), 13–23.

Messick, S. (1996). Validity of performance assessments. In G. Phillips (Ed.),

Technical issues in large-scale performance assessment (pp. 1–18).

Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Millar, R., & Osborne, J. F. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science Education for the

Future. London: King's College London.

Miller, G. A., & Chapman, J. P. (2001). Misunderstanding Analysis of

Covariance. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110 (1), 40-48.

179

Millman, J., & Greene, J. (1993). The specification and development of tests of

achievement and ability. In R. Linn (Ed.), Educational measurement, (3rd ed.,

pp. 335–366). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

Mislevy, R., Steinberg, L., & Almond, R. (2002). Design and analysis in task-based

language assessment. Language Testing, 19(4), 477–496.

Mislevy, R., Wilson, M., Ercikan, K., & Chudowsky, N. (2003). Psychometric

principles in student assessment. In T. Kellaghan & D. Stufflebeam(Eds.),

International handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 489–532). Boston:

Kluwer Academic.

Morgil, İ., Çingör, N., Erökten, S., Yavuz, S. & Özyalçın Oskay, Ö. (2004).

Bilgisayar destekli kimya eğitiminde portfolyo çalışmaları [Portfolio studies in

computer assisted chemistry education]. The Turkish Online Journal of

Educational Technology – TOJET, 3(2), 105-118.

Morris, N. (1961). An historian‘s view of examinations. In S. Wiseman(Ed.),

Examinations and English education (pp. 1–43). Manchester, UK: Manchester

University Press.

Moskal, B. M. (2003). Recommendations for developing classroom performance

assessments and scoring rubrics. Practical Assessment, Research &

Evaluation, 8(14). Retrieved January 13, 2009, from

http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=14

Moss, P. A. (1992). Shifting conceptions of validity in educational measurement:

Implications for performance assessment. Review of Educational Research,

62(3), 229-258.

Mueller, J. (2010). Authentic assessment toolbox. Retrieved July 28, 2004, from

http://jonathan.mueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/whatisit.htm

Mueller, J. (2008). Authentic Assessment Toolbox: What is Authentic Assessment?

Retrieved November 6, 2008‚

http://jonathan.mueller.faculty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/whatisit.htm

180

Muller, J. (2005). The Authentic Assessment Toolbox: Enhancing Student Learning

through Online Faculty Development. Journal of online learning and

teaching.1(1).

Muskie School of Public Service. (2010). Authentic Assessment in Infant & Toddler

Care Settings: Review of Recent Research. Cutler Institute for Health and

Social Policy. University of Southern Maine. http://muskie.usm.maine.edu.

National Academy of Education. (2008). Recovering the Promise of Standards-Based

Education. Education Policy Briefing Sheet presented that at the National

Academy of Education, Education Policy in Transition Public Forum,

Washington,

http://naeducation.org/White_Papers_Project_Standards_Assessments_and_A

ccountability_Briefing_Sheet.pdf

National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards.

Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences.

National Science Education Standards. (1996). Changing Emphases in Assessment of

Student Learning. National Academy of Sciences. Courtesy of the National

Academies Press. Washington, DC.

National Center for Fair and Open Testing .(1992). What Is Authentic Assessment?

Cambridge, MA. NCFOT.

National Council on Education Standards and Testing (1992). Raising standards for

American Education. Washington, DC: Author.

Nbina, J. B., & Viko, B. (2010). Effect of instruction in Metacognitive self-

assessment strategy on Chemistry Students self-efficacy and achievement.

University of Port Harcourt .P.O. Box 3 Choba, Rivers State.

drnbinajacobson@yahoo.com

Newmann, F. M.‚ & Archbald, D. A. (1992) The nature of authentic academic

achievement, in: H. Berlak, F. M. Newmann, E. Adams, D. A. Archbald, T.

Burgess, J. Raven and T. A. Romberg Toward a new science of educational

testing and assessment(Albany, New York, USA, SUNY Press).

181

Niemi, D., Baker, E. L., & Sylvester, R.M. (2007). Scaling up, scaling down: Seven

years of performance assessment devolpment in the nation‘s second largest

school district. Educational Assessment, 12(3 & 4), 195-214.

Office of Technology Assessment. (1992). Testing in American schools: Asking the

right questions (OTA-SET-519). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing

Office.

Olfos, R., & Zulantay, H. (2007). Reliability and Validity of Authentic Assessment in

a Web Based Course. Educational Technology & Society, 10 (4), 156-173.

O‗Malley, J. M. & Valdez Pierce, L. (1996). Authentic assessment for English

language learners. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Ommundsen, Y. (2006). Pupils‘ self-regulation in physical education: the role of

motivational climates and differential achievement goals. Eur. Phys. Educ.

Rev. 2‚ 289-315.

Ommundsen, Y. (2003). Implicit theories of ability and self-regulation strategies in

physical education classes. Educ. Psychol. 23‚ 141-157.

O‘ Neil, H. F., & Brown, R. S. (1998). Differential effect of Question formats in Math

Assessment on metacognition and Affect. Applied Measurment in Education,

11(4), 331- 351.

O‘ Neil, H. F., & Abedi, J. (1996). Reliability and Validity of a state Metacognition

Inventory: Potential for Alternative Assessment. CRESST/ University of

California, Los Angeles.

O‘Neil, H. F., Sugrue, B., Abedi, J., Baker, E. L., & Golan, S. (1992). Final report of

experimental studies on motivation and NAEP test performance (Report to

NCES, Grant No. RS90159001). Los Angeles: University of California,

Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student testing.

Oosterhof, A. (2003). Developing and using classroom assess ament. Prentic. Hall.

Ozsoy, G., & Asaman, A. (2009). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on

mathematical problem solving achievement. International Electronic Journal

of Elementary Education‚1( 2).

182

Pallant, J. (2001), Methods for clinical therapists,Churchill livingstone, National

library of Australia.

Palm, T. (2008). Performance Assessment and Authentic Assessment: A Conceptual

Analysis of the Literature. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation,

13(4), 1-11.

Pappa, E., Zafiropoulou, M., & Metallidou, P. (2003). Intervention on strategy use

and on motivation of Greek pupils‘ reading comprehension in English classes.

Percept. Mot. Skills 96‚773-786.

Paris, S. G.‚ & Winograd, P. (1990). Promoting metacognition and motivation of

exceptional children. Remedial and Special Education, 11(6), 7-15.

Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2005). Results that matter: 21st century skills

and high school reform. Retrieved January 23, 2008, from

http://www.21stcenturyskills.org.

Pellegrino, J. W. (2006). Rethinking and redesigning curriculum, instruction ad

assessment: what contemporary research and theory suggests. A paper

commissioned by the National Center on Education and the Economy for the

New Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce. Washington DC:

National Center on Education and the Economy.

Pellegrino, J. W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what

students know: The science and design of educational assessment.

Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Pierce, L.V. (2002). Performance-Based Assessment: Promoting Achievement for

English Language Learners.Clearinghouse on language and linguistics. Center

for applied linguistics‚ 26(1).

Pintrich, P. R. (2002). The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and

assessment. Theory into Practice, 41(4), 219-225.

Pintrich P.R. (2002), The role of metacognitive knowledge in learning, teaching, and

assessing, Theor. Pract., 41, 219-225.

Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C. A., & Baxter, G. P. (2000). Assessing metacognition and

self-regulated learning. In G. Schraw, & J. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the

183

Measurement of Metacognition (pp. 43 - 97). University of Nebraska: Buros-

Nebraska Series on Measurement and Testing.

Pintrich, P., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning

components of classroom academic performance. J. Educ. Psychol. 82‚33-40.

Pokay, P., Blumenfeld, P. (1990). Predicting achievement early and late in semester:

the role of motivation and use of learning strategies. J. Educ. Psychol. 82‚ 41-

50.

Popham, W. J. (2001). Teaching to the Test? Educational Leadership, 58(6), 16-20.

Pressley, M., Van Etten, S., Yokoi, L., Freebern, G., & Van Meter, P. (1998). The

metacognition of college studentship: A grounded theory approach. In D. J.

Pressley, M., Ghatala, ES. (1990). Self-regulated learning: monitoring learning from

text. Educ. Psychol. 25‚19-33.

Quellmalz, E. S. (1991). Developing criteria for performance assessments: The

missing link. Applied Measurement in Education, 4(4), 319-331.

Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf. (2006). Testing and testing process. Retrieved

January 8, 2008. from www.rid.org/education/testing/ index.cfm

Resnick, L. B., & Resnick, D. P. (1982). Assessing the thinking curriculum: New

tools for educational reform. In B. G. Gifford & M. C. O‘Conner (Eds.).,

Changing assessment: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement and

instruction(pp. 37-55), Boston: Kluwer Academics.

Rickey, D., & Stacy, A. M. (2000). The role of metacognition in learning chemistry.

Journal of Chemical Education, 77(7), 915.

Rickey, D. (1999). The effects of laboratory curriculum and instruction on

undergraduate students' understanding of chemistry. (Ph.D., University of

California, Berkeley).

Ridley, K. L.‚ & Stern, B. S. (1998). Using authentic assessment and qualitative

methodology to bridge theory and practice. The Educational Forum, 62(2),

178-185.

184

Roberts, L., Wilson, M., & Draney, K. (1997). The SEPUP assessment system: An

overview (BEAR Report Series SA-97-1). Berkeley: University of California,

Berkeley Evaluation and Assessment Research Center.

Rudolph, F. (1990). The American college and university: A history. Athens:

University of Georgia Press.

Ruiz-Primo, M., & Shavelson, R. (1996). Rhetoric and reality in science performance

assessment: An update. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10),

1045–1063.

Rust, Christ. (2002). Assessment‘, in Assessment strategies for Pop Music

Performance, University of Salford Dept of Music, FDTL Project

POP.Learning and Teaching Briefing Papers Series, 1.

Sadler, D. R. (1987). Specifying and promulgating achievement standards. Oxford

Review of Education, 13(2), 191-209.

Safari, Y.‚ & Marzoughi, R. (2010). Experimental study of analyzing the effects of

meta-cognition approaches of teaching on educational condition and meta-

cognition intelligence of students in their elementary school schedule. Journal

of DaneshvarRaftar,3188-1028.

Santiago, G. (2008). Design and validation a multi-method assessment of meta-

cognition and study of the effectiveness of meta-cognitive interventions. Ph.D

thesis. Clemson University. etd.lib.clemson.edu/documents/1219850998/umi-

clemson-1711.pdf.

Saskatchewan Education. (1991). Student Evaluation: A Teacher Handbook. www.

Sasked. Sk. ca/k/pecs/student/eva.

Sari, P. L., & Wiyarsi, A. (2011). Effectiveness of performance assessment towards

chemistry learning productivity and motivation of senior high-school students

in special region of Yogyakarta. eprints.uny.ac.id/2706.

Schoen, H., Cebulla, K., Finn, K., & Fi, C. (2003). Teacher variables that relate to

student achievement when using a standards-based curriculum. Journal for

Research in Mathematics Education, 34(3), 228-259.

185

Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science

education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning.

Research in Science Education, 36, 111-139.

Schraw G., Brooks D.W. and Crippen, K.J., (2005), Using an interactive,

compensatory model of learning to improve chemistry teaching, J. Chem.

Educ., 82, 637-640.

Schraw, G.‚ & Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive theories. Educational Psychology

Review, 7(4), 351-371.

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness.

Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.

Schunk, D. H., Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Self-regulation of learning performance:

Issues and educational applications, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale

NJ.

Segers, M.‚ Martens, R.‚ & Bossche, P. (2008).Understanding how a case-based

assessment instrument influences student teachers learning approaches.

Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1751-1764.

Shamir, A., Mevarech, Z., & Gidac, C.(2008). The Assessment of Meta-Cognition in

different context: individualized vs. peer assisted learning. Journal of

Humanities, Social science and Law. Metacognition learning‚ 4(1), 46-61.

Shavelson, R., Solano-Flores, G., & Ruiz-Primo, M. (1998). Toward a science

performance assessment technology. Evaluation and Program Planning,

21(2), 171–184.

Shepard, L. A. (2000). The Role of Classroom Assessment in Teaching and Learning.

Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence, University of

California, Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street Santa Cruz, CA 95064 (408) 459-

3500.

Shevelson, R. J., Baxter, G. P., & Pine, J. (1991). Performance assessment in science.

Applied Measurement in Education, 4, 347-362.

She, J. L., Tasi, Y. M., Chiu, M. H., & Chen, H. J. (2007). The Performance of

Taiwan‘s Undergraduates in Organic Chemistry Laboratory. Graduate

186

Institute of Science Education, National Taiwan Normal University Taipei,

10617, Taiwan.

Shen, C. Y., & Liu, H. C. (2011). Metacognitive Skills Development: A Web-based

Approach In Higher Education. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of

Educational Technology‚ 10(2).

Shepard, L. A. (2000). The Role of Assessment in a Learning Culture. Educational

Researcher, 29(7), 11.

Smilkstein, R. (2003). We're Born to Learn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., & Staley, R. (2004). Metacognition and self-

regulated learning constructs. Educational Research and Evaluation, 10, 117-

139.

Snow, R. (1993). Construct validity and constructed-response tests. In R. Bennett &

W. Ward (Eds.), Construction versus choice in cognitive measurement (pp.

45–60). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Sommer, R. & Sommer, B. (1986). A Practical Guide to Behavioral Research (5th

ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. First edition published in 1980.

Spady, W. G. (1992). It‘s time to take a close look at outcome-based education.

outcomes, 6-12.

Starch, D. & Elliot, E. (1912). Reliability of grading high school work in English.

School Review, 20, 442–457.

Starch, D., & Elliot, E. (1913). Reliability of grading high school work in

mathematics. School Review, 21, 254–259.

StatSoft, Inc. (2012). Electronic Statistics Textbook. Tulsa, OK: StatSoft. WEB:

http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/.

Stecher, B. (2010). Performance Assessment in an Era of Standards-Based

Educational Accountability. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford

Center for Opportunity Policy in Education. http://edpolicy.stanford.edu.

Stecher, B., Barron, S., Chun, T., & Ross, K. (2000). The effects of the Washington

state education reform in schools and classrooms (CSE Tech. Rep. NO. 525).

187

Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on

Evaluation, Standards and Student Testing.

Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment FOR learning.

Phi Delta Kappan, 83 (10), 758-765.

Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Leadership for Excellence in Assessment: A Powerful New

School district Planning Guide. Portland, OR: Assessment Training Institute.

Stiggins, R. (1987a). Design and development of performance assessments.

Educational Measurement: Issues and Practices, 6(3), 33–42.

Stiggins, R. (1987b). Instructor‘s guide for Design and Development of Performance

Assessments. Retrieved May 18, 2008, from www.ncme. org/pubs/items.cfm.

Swanson, H. L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on

problem solving. J. Educ. Psychol. 82‚ 306-314.

Swartz, R. J. (2001). ―Infusing Critical and Creative Thinking into Content

Instruction‖, in ―Developing Minds‖, edited by A. L. Costa, 3rd Edition, p.

271, ASCD.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.).

Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

Tansaz, F., & Tavousi, M. N. ( 2011). The Relationship between Meta- Cognitive

and Achievement in Special Texts in English Course of the University

Students. Journal of Curriculum Plannin‚1197-28.

Te Puna Puoru National Centre for Research in Music Education and Sound

Arts.(2010). Metacognition et al. E-Journal of studies in music education‚

9(1). www.merc.canterbury.ac.nz.

Tharp, R. G., & Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and

schooling in social context. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Thomas, G., Anderson, D., & Nashon, S. (2008). Development of an Instrument

Designed to Investigate Elements of Science Students‘ Meta-cognition, Self-

Efficacy and Learning Processes: The SEMLI-S. International Journal of

Science Educationl‚ 30(13), 17.

188

Thomas, G. P. (2006). Metacognition and science education: Pushing forward from a

solid foundation. Research in Science Education, 36, 1-6.

Tien, L. T., Teichert, M. A., & Rickey, D. (2007). Effectiveness of a MORE

laboratory module in prompting students to revise their molecular-level ideas

about solutions. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(1), 175-181.

Ting, Y. C.‚ & Yi, T. C. (2009). Cooperative learning in e-learning: a peer assessment

of student- centered using consistent fuzzy preferences. Expert system with

Applications‚ 36, 8342-8349.

Tippa, J.‚ & Pardo. (2006). A. Assessment of learning environmental quality from the

point of view of secondary and high school learners. Learning and Education,

16, 295-309.

Tough, S.‚ & Reed, J. (2006). Curriculum, assessment and pedagogy: Beyond the

―standards agenda‖. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.

Tsai, C. (2001). A review and discussion of epistemological commitments,

metacognition, and critical thinking with suggestion on their enhancement in

internet-assisted chemistry classrooms. Journal of Chemical Education, 78(7),

970-974.

VanTassel-Baska, J., Jonson, D., & Avery, L. (2002). Using performance tasks in the

identification of economically disadvantaged and minority gifted learners:

Findings from Project STAR. Gifted Child Quarterly46(2), 110–123.

Veenman, M. V. J., & Spaans, M. A. (2005). Relation between intellectual and

metacognitive skills: age and task differences. Learn. Ind. Diff. 15‚159-176.

Veenman M. V. J., Elshout J. J.‚ & Meijer‚ J. (1997). The generality vs. domain-

specificity of metacognitive skills in novice learning across domains, Learn.

Instr, 7, 187-209.

Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority. (2010). Chemistry: Victorian Certifi

cate of Education Study Design. 33 St Andrews Place, East Melbourne,

Victoria 3002,15.

Volkwein, J. F. (2003). ―Implementing Outcomes Assessment on Your Campus.‖ The

RP Group EJournal‚1(1).

189

Wadsworth, B. J.(1989). Piaget‘s theory of cognitive and affective development. 4th

ed. New York: Longman.

Wang, T. (2010). Web-based dynamic assessment: Taking assessment as teaching as

teaching and learning strategy for improving student's e-learning effectiveness.

Computers & Education, 54, 1157-1160.

Wang, J., Lien Kao, H.‚ & wen Lin, S. (2010). Preservice teacher's initial conceptions

about assessment of science learning: the coherence with their views of

learning science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 522-529.

Whitebread, D., Coltman, P., Pasternak, D. P., Sangster, C., Grau, V., Bingham, S.,

Almeqdad, Q., & Demetriou, D. (2009). The development of two

observational tools for assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning in

young children. Metacognition and Learning, 4(1), 63-85.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design (2nd ed.). Alexandria,

VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Wiggins, G. P. (1993). Assessing Student Performance. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

Publishers. (p. 229).

Wiggins, G. (1989). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi

Delta Kappan, 70, 703-713.

Wilburne, J. M. (1997). The effect of teaching metacognition strategies to pre-service

elementary school teachers on their mathematical problem-solving

achievement and attitude. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple

University.

Wiles, W. (1997). The effect of metacognitive strategies program on academic

performance, perceived success and control for adults returning to school for

academic upgrading. Ph.D. thesis. University of Alberta at Edmonton.

www.nlc-bnc.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk3/ftp05/nq23090.pdf.

Wilson, M., & Sloane, K. (in press). From principles to practice: An embedded

assessment system. Applied Measurement in Education.

190

Winfield, L. E., & Woodard, M. D. (1994). Assessment, equity and diversity in

reforming America's school. Educational policy, 8(1), 3-27.

Wisconsin Education Association Council. (1996). Performance Assessment,

Education Issues Series, Used with permission.

Yap, E. G. (1993). A structural model of self-regulated academic learning in math

achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Los Angeles, University of

Southern California.

Yildiz, E., Akpinar, E., Tatar, N., & Ergin, O. (2009). Exploratory and Confirmatory

Factor Analysis of the Metacognition Scale for Primary School Students.

Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri / Educational Sciences: Theory &

Practice‚ 9 (3).

Zare, H., & Mohammadi, A. N. (2011). Effect of meta-cognitive methods of

teaching in solving mathematic problems of students. Quarterly Journal of

New Approaches in Educational‚ 6(5)‚ 2008-6369.

Zimmerman, B. J., Schunk D. H. (1989). Self-regulated learning and academic

achievement: Theory, practice, research, Springer-Verlag: New York.