Upload
freya
View
58
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Brian Fuchs Research Mentor: Dr. Adam Higgins. Effect of Cooling Rate on the Viability of Cultured Cells After Cryopreservation. . Cryopreservation. Long-term storage of living material at extremely low temperatures. Cryopreservation is currently implemented in: Artificial insemination - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
EFFECT OF COOLING RATE ON THE VIABILITY OF CULTURED CELLS AFTER
CRYOPRESERVATION.
Brian FuchsResearch Mentor: Dr. Adam
Higgins
Cryopreservation
Cryopreservation is currently implemented in:Artificial inseminationStorage of certain types
of cells (e.g. blood cells)
Long-term storage of living material at extremely low temperatures
Future Applications Future applications of
cryopreservation are:Long term storage of
tissuesLong term storage of
organsUse in cell-based
biosensors
Problems with Freezing Process
2 main types of cellular damage:1. Intracellular ice formation (IIF)
Damages membranes and cell structure2. Cellular dehydration and solution effects
3rd type of damage is extracellular ice formation. Typically is significant only in tissue freezing
Vitrification Vitrification is the
process of freezing a substance to a point where it becomes a glass like amorphous solid
Prevents death due to IIF.
2 Treatments 2 ways being investigated to prevent cell
damage:1. Addition of cryoprotection agents
(CPA)2. Adjustment of cooling rates
CPA CPA’s are chemicals that are
permeable to cellular membrane
Help to depress freezing point and prevent ice crystal formation
Some examples are glycerol and DMSO.
Cooling Rate Goal: determine
cooling rate for optimal cell viability.
High cooling rate intracellular ice formation (IIF)
Low cooling rate cellular dehydration and solution effects COOLING RATE
SURV
IVAL
Solution Effects IIF
Hypothesis The optimum cooling rate for maximal
endothelial cell viability is about 5 ºC/min.
-40-35-30-25-20-15-10-500
5
10
15
20
25
30
Supercooling
10 ºC/min
20 ºC/min
40 ºC/min
80 ºC/min
130 ºC/min
Temperature (ºC)
Supe
rcol
ing
(ºC)
-80-70-60-50-40-30-20-1000
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
Normalized Water Volume
10 ºC/min20 ºC/min40 ºC/min80 ºC/min130 ºC/minEquilib-rium
Temperature (ºC)
Cel
l Wat
er V
olum
e (V
w/V
w0)
Process Culture cells on a
slide Add CPA Run controlled
rate freezing process
Thaw cells Perform live-dead
staining -120
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
40 ºC/min10 ºC/min5 ºC/min
Time
Tem
pera
ture
(ºC
)
Live/Dead Stain Controls
Live cells stained with calcein-AM
Live cells stained with ethidium homodimer
Dead cells stained with calcein-AM
Dead cells stained with ethidium homodimer
00.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9
1
Recovery of Adherent Endothelial Cells at Vary-
ing Cooling Rates
Control 5 ºC/min 10 ºC/min 40 ºC/min
Cooling Rate
Rec
over
y
COOLING RATE
SURV
IVAL
Solution Effects
IIF
Conclusion There is a significant correlation between cooling
rate and cell viability. Of the experiments performed, cooling rates of
5 ºC/min provided maximum cell recovery. More experiments are needed to determine if cell
viability decreases at cooling rates lower than 5 ºC/min.
CRF process is ready for use on cultured neurons.
Acknowledgements Dr. Adam Higgins Allyson Fry Nadeem Houran, Austin Rondema, Ingemar
Hudspeth Dr. Kevin Ahern Howard Hughes Medical Institute