Upload
yvr
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ww.sciencedirect.com
j o u rn a l o f p h a rma c y r e s e a r c h 7 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 5 0 6e5 0 9
Available online at w
journal homepage: www.elsevier .com/locate/ jopr
Original Article
Effect of proline on Triticum aestivum (wheat) under thedrought conditions of salinity
Manisha Jain a, Elsa Mini Jos a, Deepika Arora b,Y.V.R. Kameshwar Sharma c,*aDepartment of Biological Sciences (III), Sri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, Delhi 110021, IndiabDepartment of Botany (II), Sri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, Delhi 110021, IndiacDepartment of Biochemistry, Sri Venkateswara College, University of Delhi, Delhi 110021, India
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Received 12 February 2013
Accepted 25 March 2013
Available online 18 July 2013
Keywords:
Osmolyte
Proline
Salt tolerance
Triticum aestivum
Stress
* Corresponding author. Tel.: þ91 (0) 11 2411E-mail address: [email protected]
0974-6943/$ e see front matter Copyright ªhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jopr.2013.05.002
a b s t r a c t
Background: The increasing salinity is a major problem in agriculture around the world. Salt
stress results in inhibition or reduction in plant growth which affects productivity. Also,
most of the crop plants like wheat are glycophytes, which are sensitive to even low salt
concentrations.
Hence it is important to find out the role played in plant salt tolerance by compatible
osmolytes such as proline. Proline appears to be the preferred organic osmoticumin many
plants. The proposed functions of proline under stress conditions include osmotic ad-
justments, protection of enzymes and membrane, as a hydroxyl radical scavenger, as well
as acting as a reserve of energy and nitrogen for utilization during exposure to salinity.
Method: Wheat (Triticumaestivum) seedlings were grown in salt solutions ranging from 0.5M
to 5MNaCl concentration for 7 days. The tissueswerehomogenized in 3%sulphosalicylic acid
toobtain theextract.Theextractwasmade toreactwithninhydrin inacidic conditions to form
a red chromophore which was read at 520 nm to determine the proline concentration.
Result: Experimental findings confirm the accumulation of proline under salt stress. There
is a linear correlation between the given salt stress, and the proline accumulated implying
the role of proline as a compatible osmolyte.
Conclusion: The development of salt tolerant crop varieties would have a huge impact in the
agricultural economy. Salt tolerant genotypeswould reducepressure onwater resources and
low quality water could be used for irrigation. Engineering crops to accumulate compatible
osmolytes like proline could be a nature friendly method of adapting plants to stress.
Copyright ª 2013, JPR Solutions; Published by Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd. All rights
reserved.
1. Introduction creating a water stress in plants. Secondly, they cause se-
Wheat is an important food crop worldwide. High salt con-
centrations decrease the osmotic potential of soil solution
8590, þ91 9910374426 (moom (Y.V.R. Kameshwar S2013, JPR Solutions; Publi
vere ion toxicity, since Naþ is not readily sequestered into
vacuoles as in halophytes. Finally, the interactions of salts
with mineral nutrition may result in nutrient imbalances
bile); fax: þ91 (0) 11 24118535.harma).shed by Reed Elsevier India Pvt. Ltd. All rights reserved.
j o u r n a l o f p h a rm a c y r e s e a r c h 7 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 5 0 6e5 0 9 507
and deficiencies.1 The consequence of all these ultimately
leads to inhibition of growth and development, reduction
in photosynthesis, respiration, and protein synthesis and
disturbs nucleic acid metabolism in wheat.2e5 Plants are
exposed to many types of environmental stress. Among
these stresses, osmotic stress, in particular, due to drought
and salinity is the vital problem that limits plant growth and
crop productivity in agriculture.6 Salt acts as a toxic sub-
stance that restricts plant growth the most. It is estimated
that salinity affects at least 20% of world’s arable land and
more than 40% of irrigated land to various degrees.7 Hence
there is an increasing need for salt tolerance in plants. So we
need to find out the prominent role in plant salt tolerance by
organic compounds such as proline.8 Based on their capacity
to grow on high salt medium, plants are traditionally clas-
sified as glycophytes or halophytes. Most plants, including
the majority of crop species, are glycophytes and cannot
tolerate high salinity. For glycophytes, salinity imposes ionic
stress, osmotic stress, and secondary stresses such as
nutritional disorders and oxidative stress. Sodium toxicity
represents the major ionic stress associated with high
salinity.7 For cells that successfully adapt to cellular dis-
turbances, especially water stress, three generalizations
have emerged. First, during short-term water loss cells often
restore volume with inorganic ions as osmolytes while
up-regulating stress (“heat-shock”) proteins,9e11 possibly
indicating disturbances in protein structures. Second, under
long-term water stress, organic osmolytes replace ions for
volume regulation, while stress proteins decline. High levels
of inorganic ions appear to be incompatible with long-term
normal protein function, as perhaps are stress proteins,
which may provide no protection against osmotic stress.12,13
Third, these solutes are limited to a few chemical types.14
Compatible osmolytes are potent osmoprotectants that
play a role in counteracting the effects of osmotic stress.
Osmolyte compatibility is proposed to result from the
absence of osmolyte interactions with substrates and co-
factors, and the non-perturbing or favorable effects of
osmolytes on macromolecular solvent interactions. The
compatible solutes may be classified into two categories:
one is nitrogen-containing compounds such as proline and
other amino acids, quaternary ammonium compounds and
polyamines and the other is hydroxy compounds, such as
sucrose, polyhydric alcohols and oligosaccharides. Proline
(Pro) is one of the most common compatible osmolytes in
water-stressed plants.6 Proline accumulation in dehydrated
plant tissues was first reported by Kemble and Mac Pherson
(1954) in wilted ryegrass.15 The accumulation of Pro has
been observed not only in plants but also in eubacteria,
marine invertebrates, protozoa, and algae.6 While several
amino acids are known to accumulate in response to os-
motic stress, proline apparently has a specific protective role
in the adaptation of plant cells to water deprivation and
appears to be the preferred organic osmoticum in many
plants.16,17 It helps in osmotic adjustment and protection of
plasma membrane integrity and acts as a sink of energy or a
reducing power, as a source of carbon and nitrogen, and/or
as a hydroxyl radical scavenger. Salinity stress may increase
activities of proline biosynthetic enzymes and/or inhibit
proline dehydrogenase (ProDH) activity.18
2. Applications
Studying salt stress is an important means to the under-
standing of plant ion homeostasis and osmo-balance. Salt
stress research, benefits agriculture as soil salinity signifi-
cantly limits plant productivity on agricultural lands.19 It is
evident from the literature that, properties of osmolytes
are becoming increasingly useful in molecular biology, agri-
culture, biotechnology and medicine.20,21 Transfer of genes
for osmolyte production from salt tolerant into salt-intolerant
species is being used to adapt plants for saline and drought
conditions in agriculture.22 A variety of other stresses
viz; oxidative, protein perturbing, etc. can also occur along
with water stress, and many osmolytes probably have
unique properties that protect cells from these disturbances,
either through cytoprotective metabolic reactions such as
anti-oxidation or stabilization of macromolecules through
wateresolute or soluteemacromolecule interactions.21
Among known compatible solutes, proline is the most
widely distributed osmolyte.17 Proline, which increases pro-
portionately faster than other amino acids in plants under
water stress, has been suggested as an evaluating parameter
for irrigation scheduling and for selecting drought-resistant
varieties.23 Stabilizers are used to prevent aggregation of IgG
molecules during manufacture and storage. Proline is used in
amino acid infusion material. A 3-h-intravenous infusion of
an amino acid mixture containing L-proline in healthy male
volunteers did not result in increased glucose release from the
kidneys24; implying that increased blood levels of glucose are
not anticipated following L-proline stabilized IVIG infusion.
From the literature, the present study intricacies to eluci-
date the role of osmolyte, accumulation of proline in wheat
under the drought conditions of sodium chloride to regulate
salt stress.
3. Materials and methods
3.1. Chemicals
Acid Ninhydrin, 3% Aqueous Sulphosalicyclic Acid, Glacial
Acetic Acid, Benzene, Proline and Sodium Chloride were used
of analytical reagent of standard company. Colorimeter
(Systronics, India) was used for measuring the absorbance to
detect the proline contents.
3.2. Methodology
3.2.1. Extraction of plant materialPlant material Triticum aestivum was treated with different
concentrations of sodium chloride ranging from 0.5 to 5.0 M
and the one without the treatment was considered to be
control. Plant tissue (0.5 g) was extracted by homogenizing in
3% sulphosalicyclic acid (10 mL) in the ratio of 1:20. It was
filtered through Whatmann Paper No.1.
3.2.2. Proline estimationTo the filtered extract, acetic acid and acid ninhydrin (Warm
1.25 g ninhydrin in 30 mL glacial acetic acid and 20 mL 6 M
a b
Fig. 1 e (a) and (b) Proline accumulation at various concentrations of NaCl.
j o u rn a l o f p h a rma c y r e s e a r c h 7 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 5 0 6e5 0 9508
phosphoric acid) were added in the ratio 1:1 and then boiled
for 1 h. Reaction was terminated by placing in ice bath after
which 4 mL of benzene was added. Benzene layer was sepa-
rated and warmed to room temperature. The absorbance
values were determined at 520 nm.23,25
Standard curve was prepared using pure proline and used
for the detection of proline in the experimental conditions.
4. Results and discussion
Proline accumulation is one of the common characteristics in
many monocotyledons under saline conditions.26 It is well
documented that the accumulation of proline is a response of
plants to increased noxious elements.27 Among these, sodium
ion is known as the most prominent one.8
Very high accumulation of cellular proline (above 100% of
the total amino acid pool under stress as compared to just 5%
under the normal condition) has been earlier reported in
many higher plants species due to increased synthesis and
decreased degradation under the stress conditions such as
water, salt, drought and heavy metal.28
Seedlings of T. aestivum (wheat) was subjected to drought
conditions of salinity with different concentrations of NaCl
(0.5e5 M). Sample which was treated with 1.0 M NaCl showed
high accumulation of proline with 65 times of more than that
of the control, whereas at low saline conditions of 0.5MNaCl it
showed only 31.42% of proline. On increasing the saline con-
ditions it was found to be 84.28% and 98.57% at salt concen-
trations of 2.5 M and 5 M, respectively (Fig. 1).
Above the concentration of 1 M NaCl the decline of proline
accumulation at higher values might be some interference of
other amino acids with the colorimetric reading.
The standard plot was prepared using pure proline which
shows the amount of accumulation of proline under various
drought conditions of NaCl.
5. Summary and conclusion
From the above result we can conclude that there is accu-
mulation of proline in the plant under induced drought
conditions of salinity. The accumulation is greater at higher
concentration of sodium chloride. The expected linear in-
crease in colorimetric absorbance reading at 520 nmmay have
been affected by other interfering materials. Nevertheless, it
has been seen that proline is accumulated under water stress
and may have a role in protecting the plant, and helping in its
recovery when replenished with water at a later time.
Conflicts of interest
All authors have none to declare.
Acknowledgment
Authors are highly thankful to DBT for financial support and
Principal, Dr. P. Hemalatha Reddy for providing lab facilities to
work.
r e f e r e n c e s
1. Sairam RK, Tyagi Aruna. Physiology and molecular biology ofsalinity stress tolerance in plants. Curr Sci. 2004;86:3.
2. Boyer JS. Effect of osmotic water stress on metabolic rates ofcotton plants with open stomata. Plant Physiol.1965;40:229e234.
3. Kaiser WM. Effect of water deficit on photosynthetic capacity.Plant Physiol. 1987;71:142e149.
4. Lambers H. Respiration in intact plants and tissues: itsregulation and dependence on environmental factors,metabolism and invaded organisms. In: Douce R, Day DA, eds.Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology. Berlin: Springer;1985:418e473. vol. 18.
5. Levine RL, Garland D, Oliver C, et al. Determination ofcarboxyl content in oxidatively modified proteins. MethEnzymol. 1990;186:464e478.
6. Yoshiba Stress Yoshu, Kiyosue Tomohiro, Nakashima Kazuo,Yamaguchi-Shinozaki Kazuko, Shinozakj Kazuo. Regulationof levels of proline as an osmolyte in plants under waterstress. Plant Cell Physiol. 1997;38:1095e1109.
j o u r n a l o f p h a rm a c y r e s e a r c h 7 ( 2 0 1 3 ) 5 0 6e5 0 9 509
7. Xiong Liming, Zhua Jian-Kang. The Arabidopsis Book. AmericanSociety of Plant Biologists; 2002:1e24.
8. Poustini K, Siosemardeh A, Ranjbar M. Proline accumulationas a response to salt stress in 30 wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)cultivars differing in salt tolerance. Gen Res Crop Evol.2007;54:925e934.
9. Petronini PG, De Angelis EM, Borghetti AF, Wheeler KP. Effectof betaine on HSP70 expression and cell survival duringadaptation to osmotic stress. Biochem J. 1993;293:553e558.
10. Sheikh-Hamad D, Garcia-Perez A, Burg MB. Induction of geneexpression by heat shock versus osmotic stress. Am J Phys.1994;267:28e34.
11. Smith TR, Tremblay GC, Bradley TM. Hsp70 and a 54 kDaprotein (Osp54) are induced in salmon (Salmo salar) inresponse to hyperosmotic stress. J Exp Zool. 1999;284:286e298.
12. Yancey PH, Walsh LP. Hyperthermic and hypertonic shockinduce HSP70 accumulation and thermotolerance but notosmotic tolerance in cultured mammalian renal cells.Physiologist. 1994;37(98):1994.
13. Gagnon F, Orlov SN, Hamet P. Heat stress preconditioningdoes not protect renal epithelial Na1, K1, Cl- and Na1, Picotransporters from their modulation by severe heat stress.Biochem Biophys Acta. 1999;1421:163e166.
14. Yancey PH, Clark ME, Hand SC, Bowlus RD, Somero GN. Livingwith water stress: evolution of osmolyte systems. Science.1982;217:1212e1222.
15. Verslues Paul E, Sharma Sandeep. Proline metabolism and itsimplications for plant-environment interaction. ArabidopsisBook. 2010;8:140.
16. Handa S, Handa AK, Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA. Prolineaccumulation and the adaptation of cultured plant cells tosalinity stress. Plant Physiol. 1986;80:938e945.
17. Hare PD, Cress WA. Metabolic implications of stress-inducedproline accumulation in plants. Plant Growth Regul.1997;21:79e102.
18. Arshi Anjum, Ahmad Altaf, Aref Ibrahim M,Iqbal Muhammad. Comparative studies on antioxidantenzyme action and ion accumulation in soybean cultivarsunder salinity stress. J Environ Biol. 2012;33:9e20.
19. Omami EN. Response of Amaranth to Salinity Stress. Universityof Pretoria; 2005.
20. Cushman JC. Osmoregulation in plants: implications foragriculture. Am Zool. 2001;41:758e769.
21. Yancey Paul H. Organic osmolytes as compatible, metabolicand counteracting cytoprotectants in high osmolarity andother stresses. J Exp Biol. 2005;208:2819e2830.
22. Vernon Daniel M, Tarczynski Mitchell C, Jensen Richard G,Bohnert Hans J. Cyclitol production in transgenic tobacco.Plant J. 1993;4:199e205.
23. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare JD. Rapid determination of freeproline for water stress studies. Plant Soil. 1973;39:205e207.
24. Brundin T, Wahren J. Renal oxygen consumption,thermogenesis, and amino acid utilization during iv infusionof amino acid in man. Am J Phys. 1994;267(5 Pt 1):E648eE655.
25. Wren JJ, Wiggall PH. An improved colorimetric method fordetermination of proline in the presence of other ninhydrin e
Positive compounds. Biochem J. 1965;94:216e220.26. Ashraf M, Harris PJC. Potential biochemical indicators of
salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Sci. 2004;166:3e16.27. Saradhi A, Saradhi PP. Proline accumulations under heavy
metal stress. J Plant Physiol. 1991;138:554e558.28. Shanthy S, Soumya KK. Study of physiological and
biochemical alteration in cyanobacteria under organic stress.2012;6:1e6.