Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ISART '99 Boulder, Sept. 8-10, 1999 1
Effects of Trees on Slant Propagation Paths
Wolfhard J VogelThe University of Texas at Austin
George H. HagnSRI International
ISART '99 Boulder, Sept. 8-10, 1999 2
Content
• Terrestrial vs. Satellite Tree Attenuation
• VHF, UHF, L-Band, S-Band and K-Band Measurements and Model Comparison
• Foliage Effects Scaling
• Spatial, Frequency, Elevation Variations
• Conclusions
ISART '99 Boulder, Sept. 8-10, 1999 3
Paths and Models
Horizontal: long Slant: med. Roadside: short
TX RX TX
RX
SLAB Model SLAB Model Physical or Empirical
ISART '99 Boulder, Sept. 8-10, 1999 4
Horizontal Path Tree Attenuation
• Absorption, Scattering, Lateral wave over tree boundary layer, Slab model for layers, e.g., undergrowth, trunks, crowns
• Long propagation path through many trees
• Below 3° in elevation
• High initial specific attenuation, R
Ø 2-10 dB/m
• Fade, A = increase diminishes with range, d
))exp(1(max
max A
dRAA
⋅−−=
ISART '99 Boulder, Sept. 8-10, 1999 5
Slant Path Tree Attenuation
• Short propagation path through 1 or 2 trees
• Absorption, Scattering, Ground reflection
• Usually above 10° in elevation
• Fade = attenuation constant * path length
ISART '99 Boulder, Sept. 8-10, 1999 6
VHF Measurements
• Vegetation– Eucalyptus Forest (California)– Tropical Rain Forest (Asia)
• Frequencies - 50, 75, 100, 250, 400 MHz• Polarization – linear, V and H • Platforms - aircraft towed & balloon borne• Elevation Angles – 8° to 29°• Calibration - Relative, by (1) differential path
lengths at forest edge, (2) measured or (3) calculated clear path comparison
ISART '99 Boulder, Sept. 8-10, 1999 7
VHF Results
0.075 – 0.200V400
0.076 – 0.146H400
0.054 – 0.108V250
0.040 – 0.075H250
0.145 – 0.1510.075 – 0.1400.043 - 0.120V100
0.061 – 0.1330.030 – 0.0700.048 - 0.100H100
0.075 – 0.1250.043 - 0.090V75
0.075 – 0.1100.038 - 0.075H75
0.060 – 0.1000.070 – 0.1200.045 - 0.090V50
0.012 – 0.0300.040 - 0.1000.031 - 0.060H50
EucalyptusJungle BJungle A(V/H)(MHz)
Median Attenuation Constant (dB/m)Pol.Freq.
ISART '99 Boulder, Sept. 8-10, 1999 8
Comparison to Frequency Scaling Model
Solid line: Model with 1dB/m at 1 GHz
Red symbols: H Pol.
Blue symbols: V Pol.
−
⋅=
5.0
2
5.0
112
11exp)()(
ffbfAfA
100200 300 400 500908070605040
Frequency (MHz)
0.01
0.1
1
Fo
rest
Att
enu
atio
n (
dB
/m)
b =1.173 for median fade level
ISART '99 Boulder, Sept. 8-10, 1999 9
Comments to VHF Results
• Due to tree morphology, vertical polarization fades more than horizontal polarization
• Model under-predicts attenuation to 100 MHz– Model is based on UHF to K-Band measurements
• Model over-predicts attenuation at 250 and 400 MHz– Paths were longer than 5 – 10 m, above which the
effective specific attenuation decreases
• Model could be tuned to reflect VHF measurements
ISART '99 Boulder, Sept. 8-10, 1999 10
UHF (870 MHz, CP) Measurementsof Single TreesAttenuation (dB) Attenuation Coefficient (dB/m)
Tree Type Largest Average Largest Average
Burr Oak* 13.9 11.1 1.0 0.8
Callery Pear 18.4 10.6 1.7 1.0
Holly* 19.9 12.1 2.3 1.2
Norway Maple 10.8 10.0 3.5 3.2
Pin Oak 8.4 6.3 0.85 0.6
Pin Oak* 18.4 13.1 1.85 1.3
Pine Grove 17.2 15.4 1.3 1.1
Sassafras 16.1 9.8 3.2 1.9
Scotch Pine 7.7 6.6 0.9 0.7
White Pine* 12.1 10.6 1.5 1.2
Average 14.3 10.6 1.8 1.3
RMS 4.15 2.6 0.9 0.7
ISART '99 Boulder, Sept. 8-10, 1999 11
L-Band (1.6 GHz, CP) Measurementsof Single Trees
T r e e T y p e A v e r a g e
A t t e n u a t i o n ( d B )
A t t e n u a t i o n C o e f f i c i e n t
( d B / m )
W i l lo w 1 0 . 4 5 1 . 1
P i n e 1 8 . 0 1 . 8
L i n d e n 9 . 1 1 . 4
E u r o p e a n A l d e r 7 . 0 1 . 0
A c a c i a 6 . 7 5 0 . 9
P o p la r 3 . 5 0 . 7
E lm 9 . 0 1 . 2
H a z e l n u t 2 . 7 5 1 . 1
M a p l e 1 6 . 2 5 1 . 2 5
W h i t e S p r u c e 2 0 . 1 1 . 7 5
L a u r e l C h e r r y 1 2 . 0 2 . 0
P l a n e 1 6 . 9 1 . 3 5
F i r 1 2 . 7 5 1 . 5
F r u i t 9 . 6 1 . 2
A v e r a g e 1 1 . 0 1 . 3
R M S 5 . 1 0 . 3 5
ISART '99 Boulder, Sept. 8-10, 1999 12
Signal Variation with Position
Edge of Tree
(CP)
No 1:1 frequency correlation due to scattering
ISART '99 Boulder, Sept. 8-10, 1999 13
Simultaneous L- and S-Band Measurementsof Single Trees VS Position
PecanCottonwood Pine
Large variations with positiondue to scattering
weak frequency dependence
L
L
LS S
S
ISART '99 Boulder, Sept. 8-10, 1999 14
Signal Variation with FrequencyPine Tree; 5, 10, 15, 20 dB average fade
160 MHz
Short delay times of mostly forward scattered waves
Relatively flat fading
ISART '99 Boulder, Sept. 8-10, 1999 15
2 GHz MeasurementsDeciduous tree grove, TDRSS, CP
WestEast
South
Measurement 1Measurement 2(2 weeks later)
TDRS-1 was drifting East
TDRS-7 was fixed
ISART '99 Boulder, Sept. 8-10, 1999 16
Tree Grove Fading at 2 GHz (TDRSS)Elevation Angle Dependence, 24° vs 41° and 49°
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30Fade (dB)
2
3
4
56789
2
3
4
56789
1
10
100
Pro
bab
ility
th
at F
ade
> A
bsc
issa
(%
)
T7, T1 Independent
T1 (41°, 49° el)
T7 (24° el)
Max(T7,T1)Diversity
ISART '99 Boulder, Sept. 8-10, 1999 17
Comments to 2 GHz TDRSS Data
• CDFs for T7 at 24° repeated to within 0.5 dB rms
• CDFs for T1 at 49° and later at 41° are almost identical– for a layer of uniform-height vegetation
– if attenuation proportional to path length in the medium
– fading at 41° should be 87% of fading at 49°
• Loo Model for tree shadowing
°°==°° 49sin/24sin54.0/ 2449 µµ
2
2
02
)log20(exp[
12686.8)(
σ
µ
πσ
−= ∫
∞z
z
KxxpLoo
- ratio of means agrees with layer model
ISART '99 Boulder, Sept. 8-10, 1999 18
K-Band MeasurementsRoadside Trees in Maryland
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45
Fade Depth (dB)
1
10
100
2
3
4
56789
20
30
40
5060708090
Per
cen
tag
e o
f D
ista
nce
Fad
e >
Ab
scis
sa
ACTS Meas. (No Foliage)ACTS (Foliage Scaled)Helo Meas. (Freq. Scaled)EERSFoliage scaling of
fading in dB:
UHFAF=1.35* ANF
L-BandAF=2.33+0.9* ANF
K-Band58.08.635.0 NFF AA +=
ISART '99 Boulder, Sept. 8-10, 1999 19
Frequency Scaling of Fade DistributionSingle Tree: Pecan in Leaf
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
Fade (dB)
1
10
100
2
3
4
56789
20
30
40
5060708090P
erce
nta
ge
of
Dis
tan
ce >
Ab
scis
sa
L-Band Measurement K-Band Measurement
Scaling Model
−
⋅=
5.0
2
5.0
112
11exp)()(
ffbfAfA
With b =1.5scales best below ~30%
ISART '99 Boulder, Sept. 8-10, 1999 20
Frequency Scaling for Median FadeValid for Trees with Foliage, b=1.173
No Foliage
100 1000 10000
200
400
600
800
2000
4000
6000
8000
2000
0806040
Frequency (MHz)
0
1
2
3
4
5
Sp
ecif
ic T
ree
Att
enu
atio
n (
dB
/m)
ISART '99 Boulder, Sept. 8-10, 1999 21
Conclusions - 1• Average short path multi-tree attenuation at
– VHF (100 MHz) is 0.03 to 0.15 dB/m– VHF (400 MHz) is 0.075 to 0.2 dB/m
• Average single tree attenuation at– UHF (870 MHz) is 10.6 dB (2.6 dB RMS) – L-Band (1.6 GHz) is 11 dB (5.1 dB RMS)– K-Band (20 GHz) is 23 dB
• The frequency scaling formulation pertaining to trees in full foliage at frequencies between VHF (25 MHz) and K-Band (20 GHz) is given by
where A(f1 ), A(f2 ) are the respective equal probability attenuations (dB) at frequencies f1, f2 (in GHz), with b=1.173 for median, b=1.5 for 1% to 30% of distribution.
−
⋅=
5.0
2
5.0
112
11exp)()(
ffbfAfA
ISART '99 Boulder, Sept. 8-10, 1999 22
Conclusions - 2
• The dominant contributor to attenuation is the wood part of the tree at frequencies between VHF (50 MHz) and S-Band (4 GHz). For example, foliage has been found to introduce approximately 35% additional attenuation at UHF and 15% at L-Band
• At K-Band (20 GHz), the wood and leaf parts of the tree are both important showing increases due to foliage ranging from 2 to 3 times the attenuation
• As most signal variations in the shadow of a tree are due to forward scattering effects, the delays associated with the multipath are short and the fading is flat.