Electrokinetic Enhancement of Phenanthrene Bio Degradation in Creosote-polluted Clay Soil

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 Electrokinetic Enhancement of Phenanthrene Bio Degradation in Creosote-polluted Clay Soil

    1/7

    Electrokinetic enhancement of phenanthrene biodegradationin creosote-polluted clay soil

    Jose-Luis Niqui-Arroyo, Marisa Bueno-Montes, Rosa Posada-Baquero,Jose-Julio Ortega-Calvo*

    Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiologa, C.S.I.C., Apartado 1052, E-41080-Seville, Spain

    Received 5 May 2005; received in revised form 29 September 2005; accepted 2 October 2005

    Electrokinetic bioremediation is a potentially effective technology to treat PAH-polluted, clay-rich soils.

    Abstract

    Given the difficulties caused by low-permeable soils in bioremediation, a new electrokinetic technology is proposed, based on laboratory

    results with phenanthrene, to afford bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in clay soils. Microbial activity in a clay

    soil historically polluted with creosote was promoted using a specially designed electrokinetic cell with a permanent anode-to-cathode flow

    and controlled pH. The rates of phenanthrene losses during treatment were tenfold higher in soil treated with an electric field than in the control

    cells without current or microbial activity. Results from experiments with Tenax-assisted desorption and mineralization of 14C-labeled phenan-

    threne indicated that phenanthrene biodegradation was limited by mass-transfer of the chemical. We suggest that the enhancement effect of the

    applied electric field on phenanthrene biodegradation resulted from mobilization of the PAH and nutrients dissolved in the soil fluids.

    2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Keywords: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Bioremediation; Electrokinetics; Electro-osmosis; Desorption

    1. Introduction

    Creosote is a complex mixture of organic chemicals, mainly

    polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). Used worldwide as

    a wood preservative, its accidental spillage and improper use

    and handling at processing sites has led to the contamination

    of underlying soils and groundwater. Bioremediation of creo-

    sote-polluted sites is considered a realistic alternative to other

    remediation methods, as it has the advantages of relatively lowcost and reasonable execution periods (Mueller et al., 1989).

    A major factor limiting the success of bioremediation of

    PAH is the presence in soil of a high proportion of clay-sized

    particles. From the experience already gained in bioremedia-

    tion technology, a high clay content in a contaminated soil pla-

    ces serious doubts on the final success of bioremediation alone

    as a treatment strategy. Clay-rich soils may present a limited

    bioavailability of PAH, because of their high surface area

    available for sorption (Lahlou and Ortega-Calvo, 1999), and

    a difficulty for bacterial transport through the soil, what limits

    the access to the source of hydrophobic substrates (Lahlou

    et al., 2000). The oxygen and nutrient supply to the degrading

    populations may also be limiting, due to slow diffusion and

    low hydraulic conductivity. Associated operations such as han-

    dling, excavation, and nutrient amendments may be physicallyhampered because of the high consistency of clay-rich soils,

    which are also prone to bacterial clogging (Kaufman, 1994).

    Successful attempts at bioremediation in creosote-polluted

    sites have been documented only with sandy soils (Breedveld

    and Karlsen, 2000; Breedveld and Sparrevik, 2000; Carriere

    and Mesania, 1995; Eriksson et al., 2000).

    Electroremediation, consisting of the controlled application

    of low-power DC electric fields to polluted soils, is especially

    indicated for clay soils. This technology, which relies on

    three processesdelectromigration (movement of charges),* Corresponding author. Tel.: 34 95 462 4711; fax: 34 95 462 4002.

    E-mail address: [email protected] (J.-J. Ortega-Calvo).

    0269-7491/$ - see front matter 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2005.10.007

    Environmental Pollution 142 (2006) 326e332www.elsevier.com/locate/envpol

    mailto:[email protected]://www.elsevier.com/locate/envpolhttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/envpolmailto:[email protected]
  • 8/14/2019 Electrokinetic Enhancement of Phenanthrene Bio Degradation in Creosote-polluted Clay Soil

    2/7

    electro-osmosis (water), and electrophoresis (charged parti-

    cles)dhas already been used to remove heavy metals and

    organic pollutants from soil (Virkutyte et al., 2002).

    Its mobilizing potential can also be coupled to biodegradation

    processes, as has been shown in laboratory studies where

    (i) bacterial strains have been transported electrokinetically

    through diesel-contaminated soil (Lee and Lee, 2001) andmodel aquifer material (DeFlaun and Condee, 1997; Wick

    et al., 2004), (ii) the organic pollutant itself was transported

    towards soil zones harboring microbial populations able to

    degrade the pollutant, such as 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic

    acid (Jackman et al., 2001) or p-nitrophenol (Ho et al.,

    1995), and (iii) a co-metabolic substrate was injected into

    soil to promote TCE biodegradation (Rabbi et al., 2000). To

    our knowledge, there are no studies about the effect of this

    technology on the biodegradation of PAH, possibly due to the

    limited transport that these chemicals often exhibit in clay

    soil during electrokinetic treatment (Saichek and Reddy, 2003).

    This research focuses on the effect of an electric field on the

    biodegradation of PAH present in a clay-rich, creosote-pollutedsoil. We employed a historically polluted soil containing

    a high load of native PAH, of which phenanthrene was fol-

    lowed as a target compound. Compound disappearance was

    measured in electrokinetic cells designed to promote microbial

    activity, and the kinetics of phenanthrene desorption and bio-

    degradation were determined in solid phase and soil slurries.

    Our main objectives were (i) to determine if low-voltage DC

    currents promote phenanthrene biodegradation in clay-rich

    soil, and, if so, (ii) to determine the possible mechanism(s)

    involved.

    2. Materials and methods

    2.1. Soil

    The soil used in this study was a clay soil, classified as a calcaric fluvisol,

    provided by EMGRISA (Madrid, Spain) from a wood-treating facility in

    Andujar (Jaen, southern Spain), with a record of pollution by creosote exceed-

    ing 100 years. The site geology consists of a superficial granular fill of up to

    1 m in thickness, a horizon of silts and clays (2e3 m), a water-bearing horizon

    of sandy gravel, and compact marls. Groundwater is located at a depth of ap-

    proximately 4 m. After sampling different locations, which served as prelim-

    inary tests, a homogenous sample (50 L) of the silty clay layer from a heavily

    contaminated point was prepared by air drying for 2 weeks, thorough mixing,

    and sieving (2 mm mesh). The resulting soil sample was characterized accord-

    ing to standard methods of soil analysis (Klute, 1986; Page et al., 1982), and

    had the following characteristics: 6.6% moisture; pH 7.92; 23.4% CaCO3;

    3.26% organic matter; 0.106% organic nitrogen (Kjeldahl); 0.9 mg kg1 avail-

    able phosphorus; particle size distribution: 1.1% coarse-grained sand, 2.4%

    fine-grained sand, 37.0% silt, and 60.0% clay; 2777 mg kg1 total petroleum

    hydrocarbons; 4501 mg kg1 total PAH (sum of 16 EPA PAH). Phenanthrene

    content was 1319.5 78.5 mg kg1 dry soil. The number of indigenous mi-croorganisms able to grow with phenanthrene, estimated as colony-forming

    units on solid medium containing the chemical as the sole source of carbon

    and energy (Vila et al., 2001), was 2 104 cells g dry soil1.

    2.2. Electrokinetic treatment

    The cell designed, shown in Fig. 1, consisted of a polyethylene body

    protected with an inner layer of glass, to prevent phenanthrene loss due to

    sorption. Two cylindrical electrodes, made of stainless steel, were inserted

    in the soil inside cylindrical glass filtercandles (Robuglasfilter-Gerate

    GmbH, Hattert, Germany), which served as electrode reservoirs. The amount

    of dry soil packed in the cell was approximately 700 g. The filtercandles had

    porous walls (160e250 mm pore size), allowing the exchange of electrode

    solution into and out of the reservoirs. The separation distance between the

    electrodes was 16 cm. To promote maximum microbial activity in the soil

    by a permanent anode-to-cathode flow and controlled pH, these reservoirs

    were kept filled with a buffer solution, which was recirculated independently.

    The reservoirs were connected to a peristaltic pump, and 1 M phosphate buffer

    (K2HPO4/KH2PO4) adjusted to pH 8.00 (anode) or 5.80 (cathode) was recircu-

    lated at a constant flow rate of 12 mL min1. This buffer concentration was

    chosen not only because it allowed the efficient control of pH in the electrode

    reservoirs, but also to minimize possible changes induced in the pore fluid

    properties due to the P consumption associated to microbial assimilation,

    which is typical of bioremediation of hydrocarbons (Huesemann, 1994). In ad-

    dition, the soil was packed in the cell in layers after saturating with inorganic

    salts solution, which contained KH2PO4 (0.9 g L1), K2HPO4 (0.1 g L

    1),

    NH4NO3 (0.1 g L1), MgSO4 $ 7H2O (0.1 g L

    1), CaCl2 (0.080 g L1),

    FeCl3 $ 6H2O (0.01 g L1), and 1 mL L1 of a microelements stock to obtain

    the final concentrations of 0.0014 g L1 for Na2MoO4 $ 2H2O and 0.002 g L1

    for each of the following: Na2B4O7 $ 10H2O, ZnSO4 $ H2O, MnSO4 $ H2O

    and CuSO4 $ 5H2O. This solution presented a pH value of 5.8. The porosity

    of the soil packed in this way ranged from 0.158 to 0.188 (determined gravi-

    metrically). During packing, the soil was inoculated, along the line between

    the electrodes, with the bacterium Novosphingobium sp. LH128, which was ca-

    pable of using phenanthrene as a sole carbon and energy source for growth.

    The bacterium was cultured and prepared for the experiments as previously de-

    scribed (Garcia-Junco et al., 2003), and was added at a cell density of 2.6 107 cells g1. The test cell was treated for a total of 337 h (14 days), during

    which the voltage applied was 0.5e0.6 V cm1 (77 h) and 0.2e0.3 V cm1

    (260 h), in alternate periods. The DC power supply used was a Freak

    HY3005D-3 model unit. A control cell was maintained under exactly the

    same conditions (including saturation with water, inoculation, and recircula-

    tion of electrode fluids), but without an electric field. An abiotic control was

    also run with soil autoclaved three times, which received no inoculum, and

    was treated for 135 h at 0.7e0.8 V cm1. After treatment, soil cores (25 g

    dry soil) were taken from the cell along the anode-cathode axis and analyzed

    in duplicate for residual phenanthrene content. Statistical comparisons wereperformed with analysis of variance and Scheffe post hoc test at p 0.10and p 0.05.

    2.3. Electro-osmotic flow

    Percolated columns were used in a similar way to that one previously de-

    scribed for the study of bacterial transport through clay-rich porous media

    (Lahlou et al., 2000; Ortega-Calvo et al., 1999). The soil was wet-packed in

    glass columns with an inside diameter of 0.9 cm (cross-sectional

    area 0.125 cm2), and a length of 10 cm. A portion of soil (1 cm) next tothe cathode was spiked during packing with 27,000 dpm (266.3 ng) of

    [14C]phenanthrene (8.3 mCi mmol1, radiochemical purity >98%, SigmaChemical Co., St. Louis, MO) completely dissolved in 0.5 ml of inorganic

    salts solution. Hollow, stainless steel cylindrical electrodes were connected

    to each side of the columns. A reservoir with inorganic salts solution was con-

    nected to the anode side to keep the soil saturation conditions. The formation

    of an hydraulic gradient was prevented by height adjustment of the reservoir.

    A constant electric field of 1 V cm1 was applied for 5 h, and the column

    effluent passing through the cathode was collected and weighted. Then, it

    was mixed with 5 mL of liquid scintillation cocktail (Ready Safe, Beckman

    Instruments, Fullerton, CA, USA), and radioactivity was measured with a

    liquid scintillation counter (Beckman Instruments Inc., Fullerton, Calif.;

    model LS5000TD).

    2.4. Desorption

    Phenanthrene desorption kinetics were determined in duplicate with the

    Tenax solid-phase extraction method (Cornelissen et al., 1998). Briefly, 1 g

    dry soil, 70 mL milli-Q water, 0.35 mL formaldehyde (40%), and 1.5 g Tenax

    327J.-L. Niqui-Arroyo et al. / Environmental Pollution 142 (2006) 326e332

  • 8/14/2019 Electrokinetic Enhancement of Phenanthrene Bio Degradation in Creosote-polluted Clay Soil

    3/7

    TA beads were placed in a separation funnel. The funnel was continuously

    shaken at 23 2 C on an orbital shaker operating at 170 rpm. After certaintime intervals, the Tenax was separated from the soil suspension, and replaced

    by fresh Tenax. The sorbent was extracted by shaking with 50 mL of

    hexane for 48 h. The extract was evaporated to near dryness, redissolved in

    acetonitrile, and filtered. Analysis of phenanthrene was performed by HPLC

    as described later. The total mass of phenanthrene desorbed (extractedby Tenax) plus the amount still present in the soil at the end of the

    experiments was 97.3 1.7% of the initial mass determined by whole-soilextractions.

    2.5. Biodegradation

    Biodegradation was measured in solid phase and in slurries. Solid-phase

    experiments were performed in closed biometer flasks (Bellco glass, NJ)

    with 25 g of dry soil adjusted to 80% of field capacity with sterile, distilled

    water. A portion of the water used to adjust humidity was an aqueous solution

    of approximately 100,000 dpm of [9-14C]phenanthrene (8.3 mCi mmol1,

    radiochemical purity >98%, Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). This guar-anteed the homogenization of the labeled compound with native phenanthrene.

    The flasks were closed with Teflon-lined stoppers, and incubated at 23 2 C.

    Production of14CO2 was measured as radioactivity appearing in the alkali trap

    of the biometer flasks. The trap contained 1 mL of 0.5 M NaOH. Periodically,

    the solution was removed from the trap and replaced with fresh alkali. The

    NaOH solution was mixed with 5 mL of liquid scintillation cocktail, and the

    mixture kept in darkness for about 8 h for dissipation of chemiluminescence.

    Radioactivity was measured with a liquid scintillation counter. Residual con-

    tents of native phenanthrene were determined in separate flasks that were in-

    cubated under the same conditions but contained no 14C-labeled compound.After certain time intervals, duplicate flasks were sacrificed and kept frozen

    at 80 C until analysis for phenanthrene content by HPLC.For experiments with soil slurries, 15 g of soil was placed in 250-mL

    Erlenmeyer flasks, 1 mL of distilled water containing 100,000 dpm of radiola-

    beled phenanthrene was added to the soil, and the mixture was homogenized.

    A sterile, inorganic salts solution (pH 5.8), described above, was added to

    complete a final volume of 100 mL. The slurries were then inoculated with

    Novosphingobium sp. LH128, which was cultured and prepared for minerali-

    zation experiments as previously described (Garcia-Junco et al., 2003). Each

    flask received an inoculum of approximately 107 cells g1. The flasks were

    then closed with Teflon-lined stoppers, from which an 8-mL vial containing

    1 mL of 0.5 M NaOH was suspended to trap 14CO2. The flasks were incubated

    at 23 2 C on an orbital shaker operating at 100 rpm. Measurements ofmineralization of the radiolabeled phenanthrene and residual concentration

    of the native compound were carried out as above.

    B

    Filtercandle

    Peristaltic pumpA

    Phosphate

    buffer pH 8.00

    Phosphate

    buffer pH 5.80

    Contaminated clay soil

    Glass body cell

    Water flow

    Stainless steel

    cathode

    Stainless steel

    anode

    Magnetic stirrer

    Tygon tubes

    + -

    Fig. 1. Design of electroremediation cell used to treat creosote-polluted clay soil. (A) Schematic diagram. (B) Detail.

    328 J.-L. Niqui-Arroyo et al. / Environmental Pollution 142 (2006) 326e332

  • 8/14/2019 Electrokinetic Enhancement of Phenanthrene Bio Degradation in Creosote-polluted Clay Soil

    4/7

    2.6. Data analysis

    Desorption and mineralization/biodegradation data were analyzed in two

    ways. On the one hand, mineralization and biodegradation rates were calculated

    and compared as the slope of the regression lines drawn with the points

    belonging to the phase of maximum mineralization or disappearance in experi-

    ments with radiolabeled and native phenanthrene, respectively (Ortega-Calvo

    et al., 1995). On the other hand, data of desorption and biodegradation ofnative phenanthrene could be empirically described by the following two-

    compartment kinetic model:

    St=So Frap expKrapt

    Fslow expKslowt 1

    where St and So (g) are the soil-sorbed amounts of phenanthrene at time t(h)and

    at the start of the experiment, respectively (Cornelissen et al., 1998), Frap and

    Fslow are the rapidly and slowly desorbing (or biodegrading) fractions, Krapand Kslow (h

    1) are the rate constants of rapid and slow desorption/biodegrada-

    tion. Frap, Fslow, Krap and Kslow were obtained by minimizing the cumulative

    squared residuals between experimental and calculated values of ln(St/So).

    The software usedfor the minimization was MicrosoftExcel 97 (Solver option).

    It should be noted that the use of this empirical, two-compartment model with

    desorption and biodegradation data does not necessarily imply a direct depen-

    dence or influence of one of these two processes on the other.

    2.7. Phenanthrene analysis

    Soil samples were defrosted, dried at 40 C, ground with a mortar and pes-

    tle, and extracted in a Soxhlet with 100 mL dichloromethane for 8 h. Then, the

    organic solvent was evaporated to near dryness, and the residue was dissolved

    in 15 mL acetonitrile and filtered through Whatman grade 1 filter paper. Phen-

    anthrene analysis was carried out using a Waters HPLC system (2690 separa-

    tions module and 474 scanning fluorescence detector. Column: Nova-Pak C18Waters, 3.9 150 mm; flow: 1 mL min1; mobile phase: 60% acetonitrile40% water). Analysis of phenanthrene content of a reference material (diesel

    particulate matter 2975, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gai-

    thersburg, USA) was in good agreement with the certified value (the measured

    value being 10.8 2.8 mg kg1, and the certified value 17.0 2.8 mg kg1).A control was also run for possible losses during drying. The soil sample

    was wetted with distilled water up to 80% field capacity, and processed as

    described above. The concentration of phenanthrene was 1111.5 89.1 mg kg1. In experiments with soil slurries, the solids were collected by

    centrifugation at 7000 rpm for 10 min, and treated as described above.

    3. Results

    3.1. Electrokinetic bioremediation

    An electroremediation cell was designed to test the effect of

    electric fields on phenanthrene biodegradation in soil. Prelim-

    inary tests showed that for a successful electrokinetic bioreme-

    diation it was crucial to avoid the generation of extreme pH

    values in the electrode reservoirs (acidic pH at the anode

    and basic pH at the cathode) due to electrolytic reactions: Mi-

    gration of protons and/or hydroxyl ions into soil would have

    prevented biodegradation, due to unfavorable ecological con-

    ditions for phenanthrene-degrading bacteria and cessation of

    electro-osmotic flow. This was achieved by continuous renewal

    of electrode reservoir solutions, maintaining their pH at a con-

    stant value. Other relevant operating aspects were (1) the

    progressive increase in current intensity observed during the

    treatment, which accompanied the application of a constant

    potential (0.8 V cm1), and was possibly caused by a higher

    conductivity of the soil, and (2) an increased temperature of

    the treated soil (35 C, consistently 5e

    9 C above the

    temperature in the control cell without current). Voltage mea-

    surements along the anode-cathode axis at points located in

    the same sections of the cells showed a linear relationship to

    the distance from the electrodes, and confirmed the monodi-

    mensional distribution of voltage within the cell.

    Fig. 2 shows the results obtained in a representative exper-

    iment. Phenanthrene losses after treatment were significantlyhigher in the electroremediated soil than in the control cells

    without current or microbial activity. The enhancement effect

    of the electric current on biodegradation was observed in the

    middle of the cell and close to the cathode, where a significant

    reduction (p 0.10) of phenanthrene concentration was ob-served after treatment, whereas little or no compound was

    lost without current. Assuming that biodegradation occurred

    linearly during that period, the rate of compound disappear-

    ance in this region was 1.320 0.450 mg kg1 h1 withcurrent, tenfold higher than the rate without current (0.140 0.002 mg kg1 h1). No significant compound dissipation

    was detected in the abiotic control. There was a slight com-

    pound depletion observed close to the anode, but it was notstatistically significant (p 0.10 and p 0.05). This showsthat the electric current did not cause any chemical degrada-

    tion of phenanthrene.

    We considered two hypotheses that could explain the

    observed electrokinetic stimulation: (i) Direct effect of an

    increased soil temperature observed during electrokinetic

    treatment; (ii) a positive influence of the electro-osmotic

    flow through soil caused by the current.

    3.2. Effect of temperature

    The possible contribution to the observed electrokinetic stim-ulation by heating of the soil was examined in a experiment in

    Distance to anode (cm)

    2 10 12 14

    [phen](mg/Kg)

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    + FIELD

    - FIELD

    ABIOTIC

    4 6 8

    Fig. 2. Effect of electric field on phenanthrene biodegradation in creosote-

    polluted clay soil. Profiles of phenanthrene concentrations in soil treated in

    electrokinetic cells under current application (FIELD), as compared witha control without current (FIELD), and sterilized soil (ABIOTIC). Initialphenanthrene content is indicated by the dotted line. Error bars correspond

    to one standard deviation of duplicate measurements.

    329J.-L. Niqui-Arroyo et al. / Environmental Pollution 142 (2006) 326e332

  • 8/14/2019 Electrokinetic Enhancement of Phenanthrene Bio Degradation in Creosote-polluted Clay Soil

    5/7

    which [14C]phenanthrene mineralization was compared in du-

    plicate samples of soil maintained at 25 and 35 C. The soil

    (25 g) was inoculated with 8 107 cells of Novosphingobiumsp. LH128. Mineralization of the labeled compound was deter-

    mined as described in Section 2 for solid-phase experiments.

    The results showed that the increase in temperature observed

    during electrokinetic treatment of the soil had little influenceon biodegradation (Fig. 3). At 25 C, the maximum rate of

    mineralization was 1.03 0.03 mg kg1 h1, while at 35 Cthe rate increased only to 1.11 0.11 mg kg1 h1.

    3.3. Electro-osmotic mobilization of phenanthrene

    The electro-osmotic flow of water through soil is a well-

    documented process (see Section 1). Indeed, during electro-

    kinetic treatments we could observe macroscopically the

    movement of water in the anode-to-cathode direction. However,

    the design of the cell did not allow measurements of the

    mobilized volume of water. Therefore, to test whether the ap-

    plied electric field induced the electro-osmotic flow of water

    through this soil, and the mobilization of the phenanthrene dis-

    solved in the soil fluid, a different experimental setup was used.

    The system was a column-type cell in which the electric field

    was applied between two hollow, cylindrical electrodes. The

    portion of the soil close to the cathode was spiked with radiola-

    beled phenanthrene. In this way, we could estimate an electro-

    osmotic flow toward the cathode of approximately 0.03 ml/h.

    The amount of [14C]phenanthrene eluted after 5 h was 1.1 ng.

    3.4. Phenanthrene desorption and biodegradation

    A series of desorption and biodegradation experiments wasperformed in the absence of an electric field to understand pos-

    sible effects on bioavailability of phenanthrene by the observed

    electro-osmotic flow. The kinetics of desorption, determined by

    Tenax extraction for 41 days in sterilized soil suspensions,

    showed the existence of two first-order kinetic fractions

    (Fig. 4). The size of the rapidly desorbing fraction calculated

    by the model accounted for 96.1 0.1% of the initial amountof phenanthrene present in thesoil.The rate constant forthe rapid

    fraction (Krap) was 0.38 0.00 h1, and several orders of

    magnitude larger than the corresponding Kslow (2.70 0.03 103 h1). The dissipation of the native compound ob-

    served in biodegradation experiments, performed in solid- andslurry-phase conditions, also followed first-order kinetics

    (Fig. 5). The final extents of compound disappearance were

    very close to the size of the rapidly desorbing fraction deter-

    mined in Tenax experiments. Furthermore, Fig. 5 shows good

    agreement between phenanthrene concentrations determined

    experimentally in soil during biodegradation and those pre-

    dicted by the first-order model of Eq. (1). The calculated values

    forKrap were 4.05 0.21 103 and 45.95 5.80 103 h1

    in solid- and slurry-phase biodegradation experiments, respec-

    tively, while the corresponding Kslow were 1.74 2.46 105

    and 1.35 0.21 103 h1. The calculated values for Frap insolid- and slurry-phase experiments were, respectively,

    96.10 2.82% and 95.40 0.59%.

    4. Discussion

    The enhancement effect of an applied electric field on phen-

    anthrene biodegradation wasvery likely caused by the mobiliza-

    tion of the soil fluids associated to electro-osmosis. This is

    supported by (i) the results from mineralization experiments,

    showing that the enhancement of biodegradation by the electric

    field was not due to an increased temperature, (ii) the observed

    mobilization of water and associated [14C]phenanthrene due to

    electro-osmotic flow, and (iii) the occurrence of a significant

    amount (more than 95%) of phenanthrene as a fast-desorbingfraction, as revealed by Tenax-assisted desorption experiments.

    The electrokinetic mobilization of phenanthrene in soils

    has been observed in several studies that used solubility-

    enhancing agents (surfactants, co-solvents, and cyclodextrins)

    in the flushing solutions. These studies have shown that, in

    spite of the limited solubility of the compound (1.1 mg L1

    (Schwarzenbach et al., 2003)), which restricts its transport

    Time (days)

    0 2 8 10 12 14 16 18

    %1

    4Cmineraliz

    ed

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    4 6

    Fig. 3. Mineralization of phenanthrene in inoculated, creosote-polluted clay

    soil maintained at 25 C (circles) and 35 C (triangles).

    TIME (h)

    0 200 400 600 800 1000

    LnSt/S0

    -6

    -5

    -4

    -3

    -2

    -1

    0

    Fig. 4. Kinetics of phenanthrene desorption from creosote-polluted clay soil,

    as measured by Tenax extraction. The dashed line represents the curve fitting

    the two-phase desorption model in Eq. (1).

    330 J.-L. Niqui-Arroyo et al. / Environmental Pollution 142 (2006) 326e332

    http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-
  • 8/14/2019 Electrokinetic Enhancement of Phenanthrene Bio Degradation in Creosote-polluted Clay Soil

    6/7

    through the soil, phenanthrene can be mobilized even in the

    absence of these agents. For example, Saichek and Reddy

    (2003) observed the nearly complete removal of 500 mg kg1

    phenanthrene in the region adjacent to the anode after the elec-

    trokinetic treatment of kaolin soil for 60 days with only deion-

    ized water. In the rest of the soil profile, however, the

    phenanthrene concentration remained unaltered. A significant

    removal of compound (up to 35%) was also reported in another

    study where kaolinite samples were initially amended with

    1.9 mg kg1 phenanthrene and treated electrokinetically for

    6 days with a NaCl purging solution (Ko et al., 2000). In these

    studies, performed with column-type reactors, the uneven dis-

    tribution of phenanthrene through the soil after electrokinetic

    treatment evidences that the electro-osmotic flow may

    generally not be uniform. Some sections present variable

    flow rates and pore pressures, probably as a result of the com-

    plex nature of the factors that control the electro-osmotic flow,

    including zeta potential and electrical gradient. This may ap-

    ply to our study, and explain the differences in phenanthrene

    biodegradation along the anode-cathode axis.

    Although we observed mobilization of [14C]phenanthrene

    induced by electro-osmotic flow, the electrokinetic treatment

    in the absence of biological activity (Fig. 2) did not cause signif-

    icant changes in the phenanthrene concentration profile.

    However, the first-order kinetics of biodegradation observed

    in separate biodegradation experiments are indicative of con-

    centration-dependent biodegradation. It is therefore possible

    that the electrokinetic treatment caused a mobilization of

    0 25 50 75 100 1 25 1 50 1 75 2 00 2 25 250

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    B

    TIME(h)

    TIME(h)

    0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500

    %1

    4Cmineraliz

    ed

    %1

    4Cmineralized

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    mg/Kgsoil

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    1800

    mg/Kgsoil

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    1800

    A

    Fig. 5. Mineralization of [14C]phenanthrene (circles) and evolution of concentration of native phenanthrene (triangles) by indigenous microbial population in

    creosote-polluted clay soil (A) and inoculated soil slurries (B). The dashed line represents the curve fitting the two-phase desorption/biodegradation model in

    Eq. (1). Error bars correspond to one standard deviation of measurements in duplicate flasks.

    331J.-L. Niqui-Arroyo et al. / Environmental Pollution 142 (2006) 326e332

  • 8/14/2019 Electrokinetic Enhancement of Phenanthrene Bio Degradation in Creosote-polluted Clay Soil

    7/7