Upload
api-3721576
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/14/2019 Electrokinetic Enhancement of Phenanthrene Bio Degradation in Creosote-polluted Clay Soil
1/7
Electrokinetic enhancement of phenanthrene biodegradationin creosote-polluted clay soil
Jose-Luis Niqui-Arroyo, Marisa Bueno-Montes, Rosa Posada-Baquero,Jose-Julio Ortega-Calvo*
Instituto de Recursos Naturales y Agrobiologa, C.S.I.C., Apartado 1052, E-41080-Seville, Spain
Received 5 May 2005; received in revised form 29 September 2005; accepted 2 October 2005
Electrokinetic bioremediation is a potentially effective technology to treat PAH-polluted, clay-rich soils.
Abstract
Given the difficulties caused by low-permeable soils in bioremediation, a new electrokinetic technology is proposed, based on laboratory
results with phenanthrene, to afford bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in clay soils. Microbial activity in a clay
soil historically polluted with creosote was promoted using a specially designed electrokinetic cell with a permanent anode-to-cathode flow
and controlled pH. The rates of phenanthrene losses during treatment were tenfold higher in soil treated with an electric field than in the control
cells without current or microbial activity. Results from experiments with Tenax-assisted desorption and mineralization of 14C-labeled phenan-
threne indicated that phenanthrene biodegradation was limited by mass-transfer of the chemical. We suggest that the enhancement effect of the
applied electric field on phenanthrene biodegradation resulted from mobilization of the PAH and nutrients dissolved in the soil fluids.
2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Bioremediation; Electrokinetics; Electro-osmosis; Desorption
1. Introduction
Creosote is a complex mixture of organic chemicals, mainly
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH). Used worldwide as
a wood preservative, its accidental spillage and improper use
and handling at processing sites has led to the contamination
of underlying soils and groundwater. Bioremediation of creo-
sote-polluted sites is considered a realistic alternative to other
remediation methods, as it has the advantages of relatively lowcost and reasonable execution periods (Mueller et al., 1989).
A major factor limiting the success of bioremediation of
PAH is the presence in soil of a high proportion of clay-sized
particles. From the experience already gained in bioremedia-
tion technology, a high clay content in a contaminated soil pla-
ces serious doubts on the final success of bioremediation alone
as a treatment strategy. Clay-rich soils may present a limited
bioavailability of PAH, because of their high surface area
available for sorption (Lahlou and Ortega-Calvo, 1999), and
a difficulty for bacterial transport through the soil, what limits
the access to the source of hydrophobic substrates (Lahlou
et al., 2000). The oxygen and nutrient supply to the degrading
populations may also be limiting, due to slow diffusion and
low hydraulic conductivity. Associated operations such as han-
dling, excavation, and nutrient amendments may be physicallyhampered because of the high consistency of clay-rich soils,
which are also prone to bacterial clogging (Kaufman, 1994).
Successful attempts at bioremediation in creosote-polluted
sites have been documented only with sandy soils (Breedveld
and Karlsen, 2000; Breedveld and Sparrevik, 2000; Carriere
and Mesania, 1995; Eriksson et al., 2000).
Electroremediation, consisting of the controlled application
of low-power DC electric fields to polluted soils, is especially
indicated for clay soils. This technology, which relies on
three processesdelectromigration (movement of charges),* Corresponding author. Tel.: 34 95 462 4711; fax: 34 95 462 4002.
E-mail address: [email protected] (J.-J. Ortega-Calvo).
0269-7491/$ - see front matter 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2005.10.007
Environmental Pollution 142 (2006) 326e332www.elsevier.com/locate/envpol
mailto:[email protected]://www.elsevier.com/locate/envpolhttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/envpolmailto:[email protected]8/14/2019 Electrokinetic Enhancement of Phenanthrene Bio Degradation in Creosote-polluted Clay Soil
2/7
electro-osmosis (water), and electrophoresis (charged parti-
cles)dhas already been used to remove heavy metals and
organic pollutants from soil (Virkutyte et al., 2002).
Its mobilizing potential can also be coupled to biodegradation
processes, as has been shown in laboratory studies where
(i) bacterial strains have been transported electrokinetically
through diesel-contaminated soil (Lee and Lee, 2001) andmodel aquifer material (DeFlaun and Condee, 1997; Wick
et al., 2004), (ii) the organic pollutant itself was transported
towards soil zones harboring microbial populations able to
degrade the pollutant, such as 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic
acid (Jackman et al., 2001) or p-nitrophenol (Ho et al.,
1995), and (iii) a co-metabolic substrate was injected into
soil to promote TCE biodegradation (Rabbi et al., 2000). To
our knowledge, there are no studies about the effect of this
technology on the biodegradation of PAH, possibly due to the
limited transport that these chemicals often exhibit in clay
soil during electrokinetic treatment (Saichek and Reddy, 2003).
This research focuses on the effect of an electric field on the
biodegradation of PAH present in a clay-rich, creosote-pollutedsoil. We employed a historically polluted soil containing
a high load of native PAH, of which phenanthrene was fol-
lowed as a target compound. Compound disappearance was
measured in electrokinetic cells designed to promote microbial
activity, and the kinetics of phenanthrene desorption and bio-
degradation were determined in solid phase and soil slurries.
Our main objectives were (i) to determine if low-voltage DC
currents promote phenanthrene biodegradation in clay-rich
soil, and, if so, (ii) to determine the possible mechanism(s)
involved.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Soil
The soil used in this study was a clay soil, classified as a calcaric fluvisol,
provided by EMGRISA (Madrid, Spain) from a wood-treating facility in
Andujar (Jaen, southern Spain), with a record of pollution by creosote exceed-
ing 100 years. The site geology consists of a superficial granular fill of up to
1 m in thickness, a horizon of silts and clays (2e3 m), a water-bearing horizon
of sandy gravel, and compact marls. Groundwater is located at a depth of ap-
proximately 4 m. After sampling different locations, which served as prelim-
inary tests, a homogenous sample (50 L) of the silty clay layer from a heavily
contaminated point was prepared by air drying for 2 weeks, thorough mixing,
and sieving (2 mm mesh). The resulting soil sample was characterized accord-
ing to standard methods of soil analysis (Klute, 1986; Page et al., 1982), and
had the following characteristics: 6.6% moisture; pH 7.92; 23.4% CaCO3;
3.26% organic matter; 0.106% organic nitrogen (Kjeldahl); 0.9 mg kg1 avail-
able phosphorus; particle size distribution: 1.1% coarse-grained sand, 2.4%
fine-grained sand, 37.0% silt, and 60.0% clay; 2777 mg kg1 total petroleum
hydrocarbons; 4501 mg kg1 total PAH (sum of 16 EPA PAH). Phenanthrene
content was 1319.5 78.5 mg kg1 dry soil. The number of indigenous mi-croorganisms able to grow with phenanthrene, estimated as colony-forming
units on solid medium containing the chemical as the sole source of carbon
and energy (Vila et al., 2001), was 2 104 cells g dry soil1.
2.2. Electrokinetic treatment
The cell designed, shown in Fig. 1, consisted of a polyethylene body
protected with an inner layer of glass, to prevent phenanthrene loss due to
sorption. Two cylindrical electrodes, made of stainless steel, were inserted
in the soil inside cylindrical glass filtercandles (Robuglasfilter-Gerate
GmbH, Hattert, Germany), which served as electrode reservoirs. The amount
of dry soil packed in the cell was approximately 700 g. The filtercandles had
porous walls (160e250 mm pore size), allowing the exchange of electrode
solution into and out of the reservoirs. The separation distance between the
electrodes was 16 cm. To promote maximum microbial activity in the soil
by a permanent anode-to-cathode flow and controlled pH, these reservoirs
were kept filled with a buffer solution, which was recirculated independently.
The reservoirs were connected to a peristaltic pump, and 1 M phosphate buffer
(K2HPO4/KH2PO4) adjusted to pH 8.00 (anode) or 5.80 (cathode) was recircu-
lated at a constant flow rate of 12 mL min1. This buffer concentration was
chosen not only because it allowed the efficient control of pH in the electrode
reservoirs, but also to minimize possible changes induced in the pore fluid
properties due to the P consumption associated to microbial assimilation,
which is typical of bioremediation of hydrocarbons (Huesemann, 1994). In ad-
dition, the soil was packed in the cell in layers after saturating with inorganic
salts solution, which contained KH2PO4 (0.9 g L1), K2HPO4 (0.1 g L
1),
NH4NO3 (0.1 g L1), MgSO4 $ 7H2O (0.1 g L
1), CaCl2 (0.080 g L1),
FeCl3 $ 6H2O (0.01 g L1), and 1 mL L1 of a microelements stock to obtain
the final concentrations of 0.0014 g L1 for Na2MoO4 $ 2H2O and 0.002 g L1
for each of the following: Na2B4O7 $ 10H2O, ZnSO4 $ H2O, MnSO4 $ H2O
and CuSO4 $ 5H2O. This solution presented a pH value of 5.8. The porosity
of the soil packed in this way ranged from 0.158 to 0.188 (determined gravi-
metrically). During packing, the soil was inoculated, along the line between
the electrodes, with the bacterium Novosphingobium sp. LH128, which was ca-
pable of using phenanthrene as a sole carbon and energy source for growth.
The bacterium was cultured and prepared for the experiments as previously de-
scribed (Garcia-Junco et al., 2003), and was added at a cell density of 2.6 107 cells g1. The test cell was treated for a total of 337 h (14 days), during
which the voltage applied was 0.5e0.6 V cm1 (77 h) and 0.2e0.3 V cm1
(260 h), in alternate periods. The DC power supply used was a Freak
HY3005D-3 model unit. A control cell was maintained under exactly the
same conditions (including saturation with water, inoculation, and recircula-
tion of electrode fluids), but without an electric field. An abiotic control was
also run with soil autoclaved three times, which received no inoculum, and
was treated for 135 h at 0.7e0.8 V cm1. After treatment, soil cores (25 g
dry soil) were taken from the cell along the anode-cathode axis and analyzed
in duplicate for residual phenanthrene content. Statistical comparisons wereperformed with analysis of variance and Scheffe post hoc test at p 0.10and p 0.05.
2.3. Electro-osmotic flow
Percolated columns were used in a similar way to that one previously de-
scribed for the study of bacterial transport through clay-rich porous media
(Lahlou et al., 2000; Ortega-Calvo et al., 1999). The soil was wet-packed in
glass columns with an inside diameter of 0.9 cm (cross-sectional
area 0.125 cm2), and a length of 10 cm. A portion of soil (1 cm) next tothe cathode was spiked during packing with 27,000 dpm (266.3 ng) of
[14C]phenanthrene (8.3 mCi mmol1, radiochemical purity >98%, SigmaChemical Co., St. Louis, MO) completely dissolved in 0.5 ml of inorganic
salts solution. Hollow, stainless steel cylindrical electrodes were connected
to each side of the columns. A reservoir with inorganic salts solution was con-
nected to the anode side to keep the soil saturation conditions. The formation
of an hydraulic gradient was prevented by height adjustment of the reservoir.
A constant electric field of 1 V cm1 was applied for 5 h, and the column
effluent passing through the cathode was collected and weighted. Then, it
was mixed with 5 mL of liquid scintillation cocktail (Ready Safe, Beckman
Instruments, Fullerton, CA, USA), and radioactivity was measured with a
liquid scintillation counter (Beckman Instruments Inc., Fullerton, Calif.;
model LS5000TD).
2.4. Desorption
Phenanthrene desorption kinetics were determined in duplicate with the
Tenax solid-phase extraction method (Cornelissen et al., 1998). Briefly, 1 g
dry soil, 70 mL milli-Q water, 0.35 mL formaldehyde (40%), and 1.5 g Tenax
327J.-L. Niqui-Arroyo et al. / Environmental Pollution 142 (2006) 326e332
8/14/2019 Electrokinetic Enhancement of Phenanthrene Bio Degradation in Creosote-polluted Clay Soil
3/7
TA beads were placed in a separation funnel. The funnel was continuously
shaken at 23 2 C on an orbital shaker operating at 170 rpm. After certaintime intervals, the Tenax was separated from the soil suspension, and replaced
by fresh Tenax. The sorbent was extracted by shaking with 50 mL of
hexane for 48 h. The extract was evaporated to near dryness, redissolved in
acetonitrile, and filtered. Analysis of phenanthrene was performed by HPLC
as described later. The total mass of phenanthrene desorbed (extractedby Tenax) plus the amount still present in the soil at the end of the
experiments was 97.3 1.7% of the initial mass determined by whole-soilextractions.
2.5. Biodegradation
Biodegradation was measured in solid phase and in slurries. Solid-phase
experiments were performed in closed biometer flasks (Bellco glass, NJ)
with 25 g of dry soil adjusted to 80% of field capacity with sterile, distilled
water. A portion of the water used to adjust humidity was an aqueous solution
of approximately 100,000 dpm of [9-14C]phenanthrene (8.3 mCi mmol1,
radiochemical purity >98%, Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). This guar-anteed the homogenization of the labeled compound with native phenanthrene.
The flasks were closed with Teflon-lined stoppers, and incubated at 23 2 C.
Production of14CO2 was measured as radioactivity appearing in the alkali trap
of the biometer flasks. The trap contained 1 mL of 0.5 M NaOH. Periodically,
the solution was removed from the trap and replaced with fresh alkali. The
NaOH solution was mixed with 5 mL of liquid scintillation cocktail, and the
mixture kept in darkness for about 8 h for dissipation of chemiluminescence.
Radioactivity was measured with a liquid scintillation counter. Residual con-
tents of native phenanthrene were determined in separate flasks that were in-
cubated under the same conditions but contained no 14C-labeled compound.After certain time intervals, duplicate flasks were sacrificed and kept frozen
at 80 C until analysis for phenanthrene content by HPLC.For experiments with soil slurries, 15 g of soil was placed in 250-mL
Erlenmeyer flasks, 1 mL of distilled water containing 100,000 dpm of radiola-
beled phenanthrene was added to the soil, and the mixture was homogenized.
A sterile, inorganic salts solution (pH 5.8), described above, was added to
complete a final volume of 100 mL. The slurries were then inoculated with
Novosphingobium sp. LH128, which was cultured and prepared for minerali-
zation experiments as previously described (Garcia-Junco et al., 2003). Each
flask received an inoculum of approximately 107 cells g1. The flasks were
then closed with Teflon-lined stoppers, from which an 8-mL vial containing
1 mL of 0.5 M NaOH was suspended to trap 14CO2. The flasks were incubated
at 23 2 C on an orbital shaker operating at 100 rpm. Measurements ofmineralization of the radiolabeled phenanthrene and residual concentration
of the native compound were carried out as above.
B
Filtercandle
Peristaltic pumpA
Phosphate
buffer pH 8.00
Phosphate
buffer pH 5.80
Contaminated clay soil
Glass body cell
Water flow
Stainless steel
cathode
Stainless steel
anode
Magnetic stirrer
Tygon tubes
+ -
Fig. 1. Design of electroremediation cell used to treat creosote-polluted clay soil. (A) Schematic diagram. (B) Detail.
328 J.-L. Niqui-Arroyo et al. / Environmental Pollution 142 (2006) 326e332
8/14/2019 Electrokinetic Enhancement of Phenanthrene Bio Degradation in Creosote-polluted Clay Soil
4/7
2.6. Data analysis
Desorption and mineralization/biodegradation data were analyzed in two
ways. On the one hand, mineralization and biodegradation rates were calculated
and compared as the slope of the regression lines drawn with the points
belonging to the phase of maximum mineralization or disappearance in experi-
ments with radiolabeled and native phenanthrene, respectively (Ortega-Calvo
et al., 1995). On the other hand, data of desorption and biodegradation ofnative phenanthrene could be empirically described by the following two-
compartment kinetic model:
St=So Frap expKrapt
Fslow expKslowt 1
where St and So (g) are the soil-sorbed amounts of phenanthrene at time t(h)and
at the start of the experiment, respectively (Cornelissen et al., 1998), Frap and
Fslow are the rapidly and slowly desorbing (or biodegrading) fractions, Krapand Kslow (h
1) are the rate constants of rapid and slow desorption/biodegrada-
tion. Frap, Fslow, Krap and Kslow were obtained by minimizing the cumulative
squared residuals between experimental and calculated values of ln(St/So).
The software usedfor the minimization was MicrosoftExcel 97 (Solver option).
It should be noted that the use of this empirical, two-compartment model with
desorption and biodegradation data does not necessarily imply a direct depen-
dence or influence of one of these two processes on the other.
2.7. Phenanthrene analysis
Soil samples were defrosted, dried at 40 C, ground with a mortar and pes-
tle, and extracted in a Soxhlet with 100 mL dichloromethane for 8 h. Then, the
organic solvent was evaporated to near dryness, and the residue was dissolved
in 15 mL acetonitrile and filtered through Whatman grade 1 filter paper. Phen-
anthrene analysis was carried out using a Waters HPLC system (2690 separa-
tions module and 474 scanning fluorescence detector. Column: Nova-Pak C18Waters, 3.9 150 mm; flow: 1 mL min1; mobile phase: 60% acetonitrile40% water). Analysis of phenanthrene content of a reference material (diesel
particulate matter 2975, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gai-
thersburg, USA) was in good agreement with the certified value (the measured
value being 10.8 2.8 mg kg1, and the certified value 17.0 2.8 mg kg1).A control was also run for possible losses during drying. The soil sample
was wetted with distilled water up to 80% field capacity, and processed as
described above. The concentration of phenanthrene was 1111.5 89.1 mg kg1. In experiments with soil slurries, the solids were collected by
centrifugation at 7000 rpm for 10 min, and treated as described above.
3. Results
3.1. Electrokinetic bioremediation
An electroremediation cell was designed to test the effect of
electric fields on phenanthrene biodegradation in soil. Prelim-
inary tests showed that for a successful electrokinetic bioreme-
diation it was crucial to avoid the generation of extreme pH
values in the electrode reservoirs (acidic pH at the anode
and basic pH at the cathode) due to electrolytic reactions: Mi-
gration of protons and/or hydroxyl ions into soil would have
prevented biodegradation, due to unfavorable ecological con-
ditions for phenanthrene-degrading bacteria and cessation of
electro-osmotic flow. This was achieved by continuous renewal
of electrode reservoir solutions, maintaining their pH at a con-
stant value. Other relevant operating aspects were (1) the
progressive increase in current intensity observed during the
treatment, which accompanied the application of a constant
potential (0.8 V cm1), and was possibly caused by a higher
conductivity of the soil, and (2) an increased temperature of
the treated soil (35 C, consistently 5e
9 C above the
temperature in the control cell without current). Voltage mea-
surements along the anode-cathode axis at points located in
the same sections of the cells showed a linear relationship to
the distance from the electrodes, and confirmed the monodi-
mensional distribution of voltage within the cell.
Fig. 2 shows the results obtained in a representative exper-
iment. Phenanthrene losses after treatment were significantlyhigher in the electroremediated soil than in the control cells
without current or microbial activity. The enhancement effect
of the electric current on biodegradation was observed in the
middle of the cell and close to the cathode, where a significant
reduction (p 0.10) of phenanthrene concentration was ob-served after treatment, whereas little or no compound was
lost without current. Assuming that biodegradation occurred
linearly during that period, the rate of compound disappear-
ance in this region was 1.320 0.450 mg kg1 h1 withcurrent, tenfold higher than the rate without current (0.140 0.002 mg kg1 h1). No significant compound dissipation
was detected in the abiotic control. There was a slight com-
pound depletion observed close to the anode, but it was notstatistically significant (p 0.10 and p 0.05). This showsthat the electric current did not cause any chemical degrada-
tion of phenanthrene.
We considered two hypotheses that could explain the
observed electrokinetic stimulation: (i) Direct effect of an
increased soil temperature observed during electrokinetic
treatment; (ii) a positive influence of the electro-osmotic
flow through soil caused by the current.
3.2. Effect of temperature
The possible contribution to the observed electrokinetic stim-ulation by heating of the soil was examined in a experiment in
Distance to anode (cm)
2 10 12 14
[phen](mg/Kg)
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
+ FIELD
- FIELD
ABIOTIC
4 6 8
Fig. 2. Effect of electric field on phenanthrene biodegradation in creosote-
polluted clay soil. Profiles of phenanthrene concentrations in soil treated in
electrokinetic cells under current application (FIELD), as compared witha control without current (FIELD), and sterilized soil (ABIOTIC). Initialphenanthrene content is indicated by the dotted line. Error bars correspond
to one standard deviation of duplicate measurements.
329J.-L. Niqui-Arroyo et al. / Environmental Pollution 142 (2006) 326e332
8/14/2019 Electrokinetic Enhancement of Phenanthrene Bio Degradation in Creosote-polluted Clay Soil
5/7
which [14C]phenanthrene mineralization was compared in du-
plicate samples of soil maintained at 25 and 35 C. The soil
(25 g) was inoculated with 8 107 cells of Novosphingobiumsp. LH128. Mineralization of the labeled compound was deter-
mined as described in Section 2 for solid-phase experiments.
The results showed that the increase in temperature observed
during electrokinetic treatment of the soil had little influenceon biodegradation (Fig. 3). At 25 C, the maximum rate of
mineralization was 1.03 0.03 mg kg1 h1, while at 35 Cthe rate increased only to 1.11 0.11 mg kg1 h1.
3.3. Electro-osmotic mobilization of phenanthrene
The electro-osmotic flow of water through soil is a well-
documented process (see Section 1). Indeed, during electro-
kinetic treatments we could observe macroscopically the
movement of water in the anode-to-cathode direction. However,
the design of the cell did not allow measurements of the
mobilized volume of water. Therefore, to test whether the ap-
plied electric field induced the electro-osmotic flow of water
through this soil, and the mobilization of the phenanthrene dis-
solved in the soil fluid, a different experimental setup was used.
The system was a column-type cell in which the electric field
was applied between two hollow, cylindrical electrodes. The
portion of the soil close to the cathode was spiked with radiola-
beled phenanthrene. In this way, we could estimate an electro-
osmotic flow toward the cathode of approximately 0.03 ml/h.
The amount of [14C]phenanthrene eluted after 5 h was 1.1 ng.
3.4. Phenanthrene desorption and biodegradation
A series of desorption and biodegradation experiments wasperformed in the absence of an electric field to understand pos-
sible effects on bioavailability of phenanthrene by the observed
electro-osmotic flow. The kinetics of desorption, determined by
Tenax extraction for 41 days in sterilized soil suspensions,
showed the existence of two first-order kinetic fractions
(Fig. 4). The size of the rapidly desorbing fraction calculated
by the model accounted for 96.1 0.1% of the initial amountof phenanthrene present in thesoil.The rate constant forthe rapid
fraction (Krap) was 0.38 0.00 h1, and several orders of
magnitude larger than the corresponding Kslow (2.70 0.03 103 h1). The dissipation of the native compound ob-
served in biodegradation experiments, performed in solid- andslurry-phase conditions, also followed first-order kinetics
(Fig. 5). The final extents of compound disappearance were
very close to the size of the rapidly desorbing fraction deter-
mined in Tenax experiments. Furthermore, Fig. 5 shows good
agreement between phenanthrene concentrations determined
experimentally in soil during biodegradation and those pre-
dicted by the first-order model of Eq. (1). The calculated values
forKrap were 4.05 0.21 103 and 45.95 5.80 103 h1
in solid- and slurry-phase biodegradation experiments, respec-
tively, while the corresponding Kslow were 1.74 2.46 105
and 1.35 0.21 103 h1. The calculated values for Frap insolid- and slurry-phase experiments were, respectively,
96.10 2.82% and 95.40 0.59%.
4. Discussion
The enhancement effect of an applied electric field on phen-
anthrene biodegradation wasvery likely caused by the mobiliza-
tion of the soil fluids associated to electro-osmosis. This is
supported by (i) the results from mineralization experiments,
showing that the enhancement of biodegradation by the electric
field was not due to an increased temperature, (ii) the observed
mobilization of water and associated [14C]phenanthrene due to
electro-osmotic flow, and (iii) the occurrence of a significant
amount (more than 95%) of phenanthrene as a fast-desorbingfraction, as revealed by Tenax-assisted desorption experiments.
The electrokinetic mobilization of phenanthrene in soils
has been observed in several studies that used solubility-
enhancing agents (surfactants, co-solvents, and cyclodextrins)
in the flushing solutions. These studies have shown that, in
spite of the limited solubility of the compound (1.1 mg L1
(Schwarzenbach et al., 2003)), which restricts its transport
Time (days)
0 2 8 10 12 14 16 18
%1
4Cmineraliz
ed
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
4 6
Fig. 3. Mineralization of phenanthrene in inoculated, creosote-polluted clay
soil maintained at 25 C (circles) and 35 C (triangles).
TIME (h)
0 200 400 600 800 1000
LnSt/S0
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
Fig. 4. Kinetics of phenanthrene desorption from creosote-polluted clay soil,
as measured by Tenax extraction. The dashed line represents the curve fitting
the two-phase desorption model in Eq. (1).
330 J.-L. Niqui-Arroyo et al. / Environmental Pollution 142 (2006) 326e332
http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-8/14/2019 Electrokinetic Enhancement of Phenanthrene Bio Degradation in Creosote-polluted Clay Soil
6/7
through the soil, phenanthrene can be mobilized even in the
absence of these agents. For example, Saichek and Reddy
(2003) observed the nearly complete removal of 500 mg kg1
phenanthrene in the region adjacent to the anode after the elec-
trokinetic treatment of kaolin soil for 60 days with only deion-
ized water. In the rest of the soil profile, however, the
phenanthrene concentration remained unaltered. A significant
removal of compound (up to 35%) was also reported in another
study where kaolinite samples were initially amended with
1.9 mg kg1 phenanthrene and treated electrokinetically for
6 days with a NaCl purging solution (Ko et al., 2000). In these
studies, performed with column-type reactors, the uneven dis-
tribution of phenanthrene through the soil after electrokinetic
treatment evidences that the electro-osmotic flow may
generally not be uniform. Some sections present variable
flow rates and pore pressures, probably as a result of the com-
plex nature of the factors that control the electro-osmotic flow,
including zeta potential and electrical gradient. This may ap-
ply to our study, and explain the differences in phenanthrene
biodegradation along the anode-cathode axis.
Although we observed mobilization of [14C]phenanthrene
induced by electro-osmotic flow, the electrokinetic treatment
in the absence of biological activity (Fig. 2) did not cause signif-
icant changes in the phenanthrene concentration profile.
However, the first-order kinetics of biodegradation observed
in separate biodegradation experiments are indicative of con-
centration-dependent biodegradation. It is therefore possible
that the electrokinetic treatment caused a mobilization of
0 25 50 75 100 1 25 1 50 1 75 2 00 2 25 250
0
10
20
30
40
50
B
TIME(h)
TIME(h)
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500
%1
4Cmineraliz
ed
%1
4Cmineralized
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
mg/Kgsoil
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
mg/Kgsoil
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
A
Fig. 5. Mineralization of [14C]phenanthrene (circles) and evolution of concentration of native phenanthrene (triangles) by indigenous microbial population in
creosote-polluted clay soil (A) and inoculated soil slurries (B). The dashed line represents the curve fitting the two-phase desorption/biodegradation model in
Eq. (1). Error bars correspond to one standard deviation of measurements in duplicate flasks.
331J.-L. Niqui-Arroyo et al. / Environmental Pollution 142 (2006) 326e332
8/14/2019 Electrokinetic Enhancement of Phenanthrene Bio Degradation in Creosote-polluted Clay Soil
7/7