135
ELECTRON METALLOGRAPHY OF ORDERING REACTIONS IN TITANIUM-ALUMINIUM ALLOYS A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the UNIVERSITY OF LONDON by PETER JOHN ASH Department of Metallurgy Royal School of Mines The Imperial College of Science and Technology LONDON SW7 JANUARY 1973

ELECTRON METALLOGRAPHY OF ORDERING REACTIONS … · ELECTRON METALLOGRAPHY OF ORDERING REACTIONS IN TITANIUM-ALUMINIUM ALLOYS A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of ... structure differing

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

ELECTRON METALLOGRAPHY OF ORDERING REACTIONS IN

TITANIUM-ALUMINIUM ALLOYS

A Thesis Submitted for the Degree

of

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY

in the

UNIVERSITY OF LONDON

by

PETER JOHN ASH

Department of Metallurgy Royal School of Mines The Imperial College of Science and Technology LONDON SW7

JANUARY 1973

ABSTRACT

The titanium-aluminium phase diagram has been studied

using electron and light metallography between 22 and 50 atomic

per cent aluminium, and 1000°C to 1250°C.

Observations have been made on thep÷ec martensitic

transformation, the ordering of the phase Ti3A1 and its relation-

ship to the disordered hcp phase« and the high temperature phase p

and the precipitation of the y phase (TiA1). This latter

reaction has similarities to the fcc hcp transformation in

elemental cobalt, but in this case both product and parent phase

are ordered.

Further, some complex networks of dislocations obtained

by reverting the y phase have been studied and analysed, this

'being the first time such networks have observed in a DO19

lattice.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION 1

CHAPTER TWO

LITERATURE REVIEW

3

2.1 Synopsis

2.2 The Titanium-Aluminium Phase Diagram

2.3 The Crystal Structure of Ti3A1 and the Effects of Ordering

3 3

19 2.3.1. Introduction 19 2.3.2. The Structure Factor of the DO

19 Superlattice 21 2.3.3. Antiphase Boundary Contrast in Ti3A1 2.3.4. Dislocations in Ti3A1 2.3.5. Dislocation Contrast

2.4 The Crystal Structure of TiAl

2.4.1. Introduction 2.4.2. The Structure Factor of the Llo Superlattice 2.4.3. Dislocation Arrangements in TiA1

2:5 Martensites in Titanium Alloys

CHAPTER THREE EXPERIMENTAL METHOD

23 26 3o

33 33 33 35 36

41

3.1 Materials

3.2 Alloy Preparation

3.3 Heat Treatment and Specimen Preparation

3.4 Specimens for Electron Metallography

3.5 A Low Temperature Jet Polisher

3.6 Specimens for Light Microscopy

3.7 Examination of Specimens

41 41 42 43 46 48 49

CHAPTER FOUR

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 50

4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9

Introduction Alloys Quenched from the cc Phase Field Alloys Quenched from the ( cc+ cc2) Phase Field Alloys Quenched from the cc2 Phase Field Alloys Quenched from the f3 Phase Field Alloys Quenched from the ( cc + f3) Phase Field The Possible Peritectoid Reaction ( cc 2 + P ) oc Alloys Containing the y Phase The Peritectoid Reaction ( + y) 4x2

50 50 51 52 52 55 56 56 62

CHAPTER FIVE

DISCUSSION

5.1 Consideration of the Phase Diagram

5.1.1. The Phases Observed 5.1.2. The Peritectoid Reaction (cc2 -f.r3 5.1.3. Antiphase Boundaries in Ti3A1 5.1.4. The Ordering of Ti3A1 5.1.5. The Peritectoid Reaction (cc-Ey ) -1.cc 2

5.2 Observations on the Martensitic cx Transformation 5.2.1. Morphology and Habit Plane- 5.2.2. Twin Related Plates in Ti-Al Martensites 5.2.3. Dislocations in the Martensite 5.2.4. The 'Block' Martensite

85 85 85 85 86 88 91

91 91 94 95 95

5.3 The Precipitation of y 99

5.3.1. Introduction 99 5.3.2. The Effect of Order on the Transformation 101 5.3.3. Dislocation Dissociation in them 2 Tettice 105 5.3.4. Growth of the y Platelets Normal to the Basal

Plane

CHAPTER SIX SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER WORK 121

CHAPTER SEVEN

CONCLUSIONS 125

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

127

REFERENCES

128

107

5.4 The Networks Observed in the Reverted y Alloys 111

5.4.1. Measurement of Stacking Fault Energy 119

CHId?TER ONE

INTRODUCTION

Despite a number of attempts to elucidate the phase equilibria in titanium

aluminium alloys, considerable confusion still exists about the form of the

phase diagram up to 50 at % titanium. It has been shown (section 2.2)

that two ordered phases exist in these alloys. These are Ti3A1 (c2) which

has the D019 ordered hexagonal structure isomorphous with Mg3Cd and TiAl

(y) which has the Llo tetragonal structure isomorphous with CuAuI.

Above 8 wt % aluminium (n., 16 at %), precipitation of Ti3A1 produces a

marked deterioration in the mechanical properties, notably a drop in

ductility to such an extent that even hot working of the alloys becomes

extremely difficult. However titanium alloys with higher aluminium contents

would be advantageous on two counts. Firstly on weight saving grounds there

is a considerable advantage, the density of aluminium being only 60% that of

titanium. Secondly the price of aluminium is about one quarter to one third

that of titanium (1275 and £1000 a ton respectively).

Because of the confusion as to the exact form of the phase diagram and to

obtain information about the mechanics of the order of m2 (Ti3A1) this

study was undertaken. During the course of the investigation the trans-

formation of cc (disordered hcp) or m2 to y was found to be interesting in

that it has similarities to the allotropic transformation in cobalt

(fcc hcp). The situation in the titanium aluminium case is complicated

by the existence of the ordering, and here the crystal structure change is

hcp,-T4fct.

In deciding upon an experimental technique for this study, the following

factors had to be borne in .aind. One technique for the study of ordering

reactions is x-ray diffraction. However the high ordering temperature of

Ti Al combined with the high reactivity of the alloys would make direct

studies difficult. The study of quenched samples, would still produce a

problem in that if the mechanics of the ordering are to be examined, it is

2

not easy to distinguish between a general low degree of order, and the

existence of small ordered regions in a disordered matrix. The weakness

of superlattice reflections in x-ray studies must also be considered.

Optical metallography presents difficulties since it would be necessary

to distinguish between phases which have the same crystal symmetry

structure differing only by the existence of order in one of the phases.

Furthermore the resolution limit of the optical microscope might well

have proved to be limiting. Hence although optical metallography has

been employed in some circumstances, it was decided to study the

reactions using electron metallography. This has the added advantage

that simultaneous electron diffraction allows one to ascertain in a

qualitative way the degree of order in a given sample.

It was decided to work on alloys containing from 22 to 50 atomic %

aluminium because most investigations limit the upper aluminium content

tot-25 atomic % and it was thought that information about this relatively

little studied region would be useful in understanding the lower

aluminium alloys.

3

CHAPTER TWO

2.1 SYNOPSIS

In this chapter a review is given of the available literature on the

titanium aluminium equilibrium diagram. Whilst every effort has been

made to ensure completeness; the large volume of material available

would have made this part extremely lengthy and tedious. Hence to

a certain extent the review is selective as far as older work is

concerned, but it is hoped it is complete as regards the more recent

work. Consideration is given to the ordered phases Ti3Al and TiAl,

and the effects of order (ie antiphase boundaries, structure factor

changes and dislocation configurations). The final section briefly

considers the p (bcc) to m (hcp) transformation in titanium and its

alloys.

2.2 THE TITANIUM ALUMINIUM PHASE DIAGRAM

This diagram has been the subject of many investigations over the

last twenty years. Even so a great deal of controversy still surrounds

the titanium rich side of the system and the form of the phase diagram

has still not been conclusively established. In earlier works the

existence of the intermediate compound Ti,,,A1 has caused some confusion,

:and it has recently been pointed out that heat treatments in the (m + p)

phase field can cause marked segregation which is. subsequently difficult

to remove.

Before proceeding with a survey of the available literature on this system

it is worthwhile considering two separate and confusing effects which

have been shown to produce spurious microstructures. These are the so

called "two phase syndrome" mentioned above and the results of hydrogen

contamination of the alloys.

4

(1) The Two Phase Syndrome

It has been shown recently by Crossley1

that alloys that are annealed

or hot worked in the (0: + p) field, may undergo severe segregation which

is subsequently difficult to remove by prolonged (>100 hrs) annealing at

temperatures below 1000°C. He showed that an apparent two phase

structure, consisting of two hcp phases in a 16 at % aluminium alloy

after 1000 hrs at 600°C, was in fact single phase by examination with

polarised light microscopy. Examination of the past thermal history of

this alloy and others that also had this ghost structure showed that

they had all either been hot worked or annealed in the (« + 3) phase

field. To confirm the suspicion that this had produced segregation, a

specimen showing this effect was cold pressed 50% and reannealed just

below the «/(« + (3) transus. It was then found to be single phase.

This segregation effect is so severe and persistent that alloys in

this condition have physical and mechanical properties typical of a two

phase material, even to the extent of giving, apparently, two hcp phases

which can be distinguished by x-ray diffraction analysis.

(2) Hydrogen Contamination

It has been shown that hydrogen, either in'solution or precipitated out

as the y hydride (Tili1.75), may affect specimens examined by electron

and light microscopy.

Blackburn and Williams2 have shown that hydrogen can be introduced into

thin foils of these alloys by electropolishing unless the temperature of

the polishing solution is kept low (ie <-25°C). If this precaution is

not taken the precipitation of the hydrides on the (1011) planes may occur.

The problem is magnified if preliminary thinning is done chemically since

hydrogen may become charged into the material and then precipitate out on

final thinning. This effect may be so marked that it obscures the real

structure of the alloy.

Y+Ti A13

1800

1400 P // j / T / 1 / -/

1 1°C /

1 // i

i

// 1

1000 I

LIQUID

600

400 Ti 20 40 60

L+TiAl3

TiAI3+AI

86 AI

a a+y

5

Ogden,Maykruth,Finlay and Jaffee .

Atomic 0/0 Aluminium—A.

Figure 2.1. The original phase diagram of Ogden et. al.

(Reference 4). The region from 50 to 100 atomic % aluminium

has been shown to be substantially correct by later investigations.

(See for example R D Elliott, Constitution of Eindry Alloys (1st

Supplement) McGraw-Hill 1965). The area of interest covers the

aluminium lean alloys in which the ordered intermetallic Ti3 Al

has been shown to exist.

6

Margolin3 has also shown a Ti-6 at % Al alloy containing 150ppm hydrogen

introduced by a Sieverts apparatus, showed both visible hydride

precipitation, and structures similar to martensitic transformation

products without any precipitation. The solution of hydrogen will also

cause a change in the lattic parameters of the'matrix, and hence x-ray

measurements on samples that have been chemically polished may give

anomalous results. This hydrogen charging is almost certainly3 the

cause of the striated structures reported by some workers in low aluminium

alloys (< 20 at %).

The earliest comprehensive study of the Ti-Al system was undertaken by

Ogden, Maykruth, Finaly and Jaffee4, and their diagram is shown in figure

2.1. Using micrographic and x-ray methods on alloys quenched from up to

1100°C, supplemented by thermal analysiS'and melting point determinations,

they confirmed that, as earlier preliminary investigations showed, aluminium

stabilizes the hcp low temperature allotrope of titanium. In this respect

it is somewhat unusual since the majority of elements stabilize the high

temperature bcc form. As well as the already identified compound TiA13

they observed a phase TiAl in the composition range 47.5 to 60 a %

aluminium. The solubility limit of aluminium in m-Ti was found to be

about 38 at % at 1100°C decreasing to about 35 at % at lower temperatures.

X-ray work by Duwez and Taylor5 confirmed many of the results of Ogden et al.

They identified TiAl (y) as having the CuAu or Lao structure with a = 3.97A°

and c = 4.05A°, and as being of variable composition within narrow limits.

A later study by Bumps, Kessler and Hansen6

using similar techniques but

extending the temperature range up to 1400°C broadly speaking showed the

same features. However they found that the cc solid solution forms not

from the melt but by the peritectoid reaction p+ m at 1240°C. There

. are also some minor discrepancies in the positioning of the cc/(c + y) phase

boundaries.

7

However all these workers came to the conclusion that aluminium is a

powerful os stabilizer and also that the limiting solubility of aluminium

in oc-Ti was approximately 37.5 at % at 750°C rising slightly as the

temperature increased.

For several years after the publication of these three studies, various

investigators noted an anomalous decrease in the hot workability of

cc alloys with increasing aluminium content. For example Ogden, Maykruth,

Finlay and Jaffee7

found that with greater than about 15 at % Al, alloys

became increasingly difficult to hot roll at 850°C. Since the base

materials were pure and precautions were taken to avoid the pick up of

oxygen and other interstitials in the preparation of the alloys, they

suspected that the alloys containing more than 15 at % aluminium might

be ordering, but could find no proof of this from x-ray studies. No

other explanation for this change in mechanical properties seemed

plausible however.

8 Following this, Sagel, Schultz and Zwicker studied alloys containing up

to 40 at % Al, using metallography, electrical resistivity, magnetic and

dilatometry methods and x-ray diffraction. On the basis of this study

they concluded that in'the extensive cc. solid solution field already defined

there were in fact two intermediate compounds m2

and e. Since the

metallographic and x-ray identification of these two phases was difficult,

they relied heavily on the more indirect methods to locate the phase fields.

Their version of the diagram is shown in Figure 2.2.

The x-ray diffraction studies showed hexagonal structure in alloys aged

under the 0:/(0c + p) transus defined by Bumps et al. In some alloys

containing 15 to 16 at % Al doubling of the cc lines occurred. Further,

additional lines were found in patterns from alloys containing 27.5 and

42.5 at %. They interpreted the results as consisting of patterns from

8

1300

1100

900

Tt

700

500

300 0 10 20 30 Atomic % Aluminium —a0.

Figure 2.2. The first diagram to show the existence of an

intermediate compound in the original all cc phase field

(figure 2.1.). In fact Sagel et. alb identified two such

compounds, cc2 and e (See text).

9

two phase oc2

and e, and then indexed the two phases as both having

tetragonal symmetry.

Anderko, Sagel and. Zwicker9, however, in the following year stated that

an ordered phase based on Ti3Al had been identified in alloys containing

10 to 28.5 at % Al. This compound was found to have the ID019 structure

(ie an ordered lattice based on the cph structure with the same c

parameter as the disordered structure but twice the a parameter). No

report of the lattice parameters of this phase was given and no mention

is made in this later study of the results of the previous investigation.

Since this time many reports of at least one ordered phase in the original

m phase field have been made.

Clark and Terry10 reported an abrupt discontinuity between the ordered

and disordered state for alloys containing up to 30 at % aluminium between

650oC and 850

oC. No data on the structure was actually given but the

authors reported that the study indicated the existence of Ti3A1.

Ence and Margolin11 '12 identified a compound having a range of solubility

about Ti2Al at 1000°C to 1200°C. They published here diffraction data

for a 25% (although whether weight or atomic % was not stated) alloy

quenched. from 1000°C. They found a = 5.775A°, c = 4.638A° and c/a =

0.803 and a structure isomorphous with Mg3Cd (D019). The authors also

reported the existence of another phase in alloys leaner in aluminium;

later work on this has been reported and is considered below. It is

thought however that the Ti2Al phase they identify here is in fact based

on Ti3Al and in a later paper Margolin

3 concurred with this.

Schroeder13 using neutron diffraction identified Ti Al in the system and

obtained interplanar spacings very close to the proposed Ti2Al phase

parameters as reported by Enc and Margolin11 . He also observed that

all but one of the unidentified lines in the lower aluminium content

alloys (which Ence and Margolin attributed to a second unidentified phase)

10

could be explained in terms of stacking faults in the powdered alloy

samples used.

Goldak and Parr14 also pointed out that the observed intensities

reported by Ence and Margolin11 for their 25% aluminium alloy do not

fit the calculated line intensities for a DO19 structure. In this

paper they reported that well annealed powder samples of a 25 at %

alloy showed superlattice lines below 600°C, and that the intensities

of the observed lines compared extremely well with calculated values for

the DO19

structure.

Another phase which has been reported by Kornilov et al15 is the phase

Ti6A1. However one of the authors (I.I. Kornilov) has since discounted

the existence of this phase16

which was 'detected by Hall coefficient,

resistivity and hardness measurements, and agreed that the results can

be explained as due to crossing of the 4, Ti3A1) transus. This phase

will not therefore be considered further.

In recent years, post 1960, the concensus of opinion has been that only

- — one ordered phase ie Ti3Al exists in the original cc solid solution field

4 proposed by Ogden et at . The only recent study of this system to

include any other compound is that due to the second investigation by Ence

12 and Margolin . They claimed here to have detected two phases; y based

on Ti3Al and based on Ti

2Al.

Tsujimoto and Adachi17 in a recent paper comment on the evidence as

follows. Ence and Margolin claimed that the y and S phases could be

detected by a difference in the optical acitivity of the two phases.

• Tsujimoto and Adachi however show that this apparent change is in fact due

to an etching effect and that lightly polished specimens showed no such

change. Further Ence and Margolin stated that in the two phase oc +y

11

field an equiaxed grain structure was seen, the individual grains being

either all m or all y. These two phases they claimed could be distinguished

by hardness measurements, but Tsujimoto and Adachi demonstrated that such

measurements even within one grain show a marked scatter, and thus the

results are therefore suspect. The original authors themselves commented

on the fact that the (o + y) phase field they proposed did not show

typical two phase behaviour.

Finally one of the authors (Margolin)3 having made a careful x-ray study

of alloys in the y region found that they have an0C-Ti structure and

evidence of Ti3Al superlattice lines was found. Accordingly it was

concluded that no such y phase existed and that the 8 phase must have the

DO19

structure based upon Ti3Al.

The present controversy is now centred about the mode of formation of

Ti3A1 (now designated m2), its critical ordering temperature and the extent

of the m2

phase field. In the concluding section of this review it is

intended to survey the more recent investigations of this system to

demonstrate these uncertainties. The actual structure of the Ti,A1 phase

will be considered separately in section 2.3.

Some recent investigations of the phase equilibria favour a peritectoid

17-20 reaction (m

2 + p)--, whereas other authors find a "closed loop"

region of m2 with the 3 phase transforming first to m 21-27. Examples

of these two differing views are shown in figures 2.3 and 2.4.

The investigations of Tsujimoto and Adachi,17'18 Sato and Huang,19 and

Clark, Jepson and Lewis20 favour a peritectoid form of the diagram. These

diagrams are shown in figures 2.3, 2.5 and 2.6.

In the case of the m/(« + p) transus ( and the (m + (3)/p transus)). OVL3

Ifidependent investigations show good agreement in the results obtained.

300 0 10 20 30 Atomic Vo

12

Figure 2.3.

Phase Diagram due to Tsujimoto

and Adachi, Reference 17.

Typical of the peritectoid type

of phase diagram.

1300

1100

500

300 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Atomic 0/0 Aluminium

Figure 2.4.

After M J Blackburn, Reference 24.

The "closed loop" phase diagram.

The signigicance of the shaded

region -is explained in chapter 5.

0

1 900

TC

700

1500 L+6

1300 p

1100

T

900

a 700

5000

a + a 2

1

a2

10

20 30

40 50 Atomic °to Aluminium

+8

Figure 2.5. Phase diagram due to Sato and Huang (19). The

features of this diagram are the high temperature phase 8 and the

high ordering temperature of Ti3 Al (quoted as being between 1300°C

and 1400°C).

I3

14

However in the case of «2 stability a range of differences is found. It

would seem however that the discrepancies are due to the difficulties in

following the ordering reaction both by light microscopy and using

other physical methods. It would appear that the Ti3A1 phase has a

relatively high critical temperature of the order of 1000°C at 25

at % aluminium.

Tsujimoto and Adachi17 '18 studied alloys containing 14.6, 16.5 and 19.4

at % aluminium by light and electron microscopy and hardness measurements.

No electron microscopical evidence is reported and the results quoted are

mainly light microscopy results. In the case of the 164at % alloy they

state that a structure seen after annealing at 1100°C and then quenching

"may possibly" indicate a peritectoid. The «/(m «2) transus was

taken from the work of Clark, Jepson and Lewis20 and the «/(« + p) transus

from the same source. It should be noted that they used a stepwise

cooling routine which could give rise to the two phase syndrome effect.

The same authors have also studied the Ti-Al-Co28 system where they say

that the binary work is confirmed. However the nature of Co as a p

stabilizing element is well documented29

and hence relatively small

additions may well depress the m/(« + (3) transus sufficiently for the «2

phase then to interact with the p-phase'producing the observed peritectoid,

even if no such interaction occurs in the binary system.

Sato and Huang19

studied alloys containing up to 70 at % aluminium using

electrical resistivity, x-ray measurements and light microscopy. In the

region from 0 to 50 at % aluminium they found «, Ti2A1, p and y together

with a 5th phase which they designate 8 (not to be confused with Ti2A1).

A diagram from their work is shown in figure 2.5. They state that the

8 phase is easily retained on quenching but no other study of the system

has found any such phase. Further although the phase could be retained

thus, they do not give any information about its structure. Another

1 5

Figure 2.6. The diagram due to

Clark, Jepson and Lewis (20).

The feature of this diagram is the

proposed miscibility gap in the

oc2 phase field.

Atomic Vo Aluminium

1300

1100

1 900

T'C

Figure 2.7. Phase diagram proposed

by F A Crossley (21). Notice the

very narrow composition range of Ti3

Al and the low ordering temperature

of --880oC.

700

• 500

// 300

0 5 Atomic

t

10 15 20 25 30 A tuminium--).

a

a + a2 a2+ a

16

feature of their work is the extremely high critical temperature they

claim for their Ti2Al phase (1400°C). This is deduced from extremely

small inflections in the electrical resistivity curves. No limits of

accuracy of these measurements are given, and though they show very

approximately the upper and lower limits of the « + p phase field there

is a very large scatter ("4- 100°C).

Clark, Jepson and Lewis20 studied a series of alloys containing between

0 and 38 at % aluminium by means of light microscopy, electrical

resistance measurements and x-ray diffraction. Their results are

summed up in the diagram shown in figure 2.6. The only remarkable

feature is the miscibility gap with the two forms of o(2 (Ti3Al). Apart

from this the diagram is, relatively speaking, very similar to those

proposed by the above two studies. It seems extremely likely that their

heat treatment regimes gave a two phase syndromeeffect, thus explaining

the(m + (Vmiscibility gap. In this work an examination was made of

the striated structures mentioned in the section of hydrogen contamination,

and seen by a number of investigators. They found that no x-ray evidence

existed to confirm the presence of two phases in striated structures and

they found the structure was hcp. The important point in this paper was

the comment made during the discussion of x-ray results, in which they say

that the existence of a narrow disordered region between the m2

and(m + p)

phase fields could not be dismissed "with any certainty".

Against this body of opinion which favours a peritectoid reaction, two of

the most recent investigations favour a diagram which shows no interaction

between m2

and the f3 phase field. Firstly Crossley21,22,23 has produced

the equilibrium diagram shown in figure 2.7. As can be seen the phase

Ti3A1 is shown as a narrow compound having extensive m + m2

phase fields

on either side. The methods used in this study were light and electron

17

microscopy, differential thermal analysis, x-ray and electron diffraction

and resistometry.

It would appear that x-ray and electron diffraction methods were not

employed above 900°C. Also, at this temperature an alloy containing

16.5 at % aluminium was shown to have an a2 structure but it is not

included in the phase diagram as either m2 or (m + 2). Further, the

results are not presented in such a way as would make it clear whether

light or electron microscopy' was used to obtain the limits of the two

phase fields. The only result quoted from the electron microscopy

study is a replica of the striated structure which was found in alloys

containing 15 to 18 at % aluminium.

The last study made of the equilibrium diagram is that made by Blackburn24'25'

26,27 This involved the use of electron microscopy and x-ray diffraction

techniques and the resulting diagram is shown in figure 2.4. No evidence

of the striated structure was found in the study. As can be seen by

comparing figures 2.7 and 2.4, the diagrams are somewhat dissimilar. In

the latter case the ordering temperature at 25 at % is in excess of 1100°C

and also only a narrow a.2 + a phase field is found. In contrast to Crossley's

results a2 is shown to have a fairly wide single phase field about 25 at %

as shown by Tsujimoto and Adachi. As pointed out by Blackburn this may be

because light microscopy is not an effective method of distinguishing

between ordered and disordered phases where no change in crystal structure

is involved. With the electron microscope however the two phases may

readily be seen and identified by simultaneous electron diffraction.

This diagram has a form which is often found in alloy systems where an

ordering transformation takes place (The Mg-Cd system for example).29

It is also possible to explain many of the results obtained from other more

indirect studies of physical properties 30,7

18

Further support for the general form of this proposed diagram is found

in later studies. For example Gehlen31

in a detailed study of the

structure of Ti3Al by x-ray methods has shown that the ordering

temperature at the stoichi6m'etric composition is in excess of 1000°C.

Baggerly32 in a study of the growth of Ti

3Al precipitates from an m matrix

has shown that the solvu>S for a 16 at % alloy is approximately 675 to

700°C, which agrees with Blackburn's results. Work by Lajering and

Weissman33

on the precipitation of m2 from alloys containing 14 to 18 at

% aluminium also shows an m/(m + m2) transus very similar to that proposed

by Blackburn, although it is displaced upwards by about 30°C at the

higher aluminium contents.

It would seem that the positioning of the m/(m + m2) transus is

substantially correct. As can be seen by comparing figures 2.3 and 2.4

there is quite good agreement between the work of Blackburn and Tsujimoto

and Adachi on this point although Blackburn curves the transus over more

sharply above about 800°C. The possibility of a peritectoid reaction

in this system was discounted by Blackburn, but in his papers no experimental

data was given on the, determination of the position of the m/(m + p) transus,

nor does he quote a reference to the use of any previous determination.

In fact, he positioned this boundary a little higher than most recent workers.

• No experimental work seems to have been done above 1100°C, about the

peritectoid temperature proposed by Tsujimoto and Adachi. In general the

results shown are a little sparse at higher temperatures and aluminium

contents.

In conclusion then, there is still some confusion as to the presence or not

of a peritectoid reaction, and it is hoped in the present work to clarify

this position and to extend the study to higher aluminium contents (up to

50 at %) and thus to construct an equilibrium diagram up to the TiAl (y)

boundary.

19

2.3 THE CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF Ti3A1 AND THE EFFECTS OF ORDERING

2.3.1 INTRODUCTION

It has been noted in the last section that Ti Al has the DO19

crystal structure. This is essentially that of a close packed

hexagonal structure in which ordering has occurred, with the result

that the unit cell of the ordered phase consists of 4 of the normal

random cph structure. This structure is shown in figure 2.8.

The a parameter of the ordered cell is double that of the disordered

cell but the c parameter is unchanged.

It is worth noting here that the DO19 crystal structure is closely

related to the L12 or Cu

3Au structure. If layers of atoms of the

composition A3B are considered to be stacked one on the other then

the Cu3Au structure is made up by stacking in the sequence ABCABC...

and the Ti3Al structure by packing in the sequence ABABAB...

In order to avoid confusion in consideration of the crystallography,

it is intended to distinguish between the disordered (cph) and

ordered (DO ) cells by using the subscripts d and s ie the <1010> 19:-

direction in the superiattice as <1070>s

and in the disordered cell

by <1010>d. Similarly the a parameters of the two cells will be

represented by the same convention; as = 2a

d.

A review of the various systems that may be used to index the planes

and directions in hexagonal crystals has been published by Partridge34.

In line with the recommendations made there, throughout this work the

4 axis, 4 index notation will be used exclusively. This system has

the advantage that similar planes have similar indices which is not

true in the 3 index notation (for example (1170) E (1210) E (7110) but

it is not immediately obvious that (110) is identical to (270)).

20

Unit cell of the D019 superlattice.

0 ALUMINIUM

0 TITANIUM

Figure 2.8.

3

Figure 2.9. An extended superlattice dislocation on the basal plane.

b = Ck-- (1170) , b = (10-170 and b1 - (Is (0110> 3 6 2 6 1 - -6— ,

21

Also since rational planes do not have rational directions normal

to them, (except in the case of (0001) and 11-Aci0 planes) the

normals to the planes are described in terms of the indices of the

plane.

The indiCes of planes and directions in either cell can easily be

transformed one to the other if it is remembered that for planes

1hkilld

equals 12h 2k. 2i'1 s and that for directions <hkil>

d

Consider for example the (1071)d plane and the [011d direction.

The (10-71)d

plane makes intercepts ad'oo'd' c on the 4 axis. When

the cell orders, these now become iass' . c. Taking reciprocals

in the'conventional way gives the plane (201)s. One represents a

direction as a vector passing through the origin and the lattice

point hkil. The Liolqj d direction then, on ordering will become

E10121

s, o 1

s, c, which simplifies to give 11.012,1

s.

2.3.2 THE STRUCTURE FACTOR OF THE D019 SUPERLATTICE

The structure factor of the DO19

superlattice with perfect long

range order is stated by Marcinkowski35

to be complicated and not

expressable in any simple analytical form. However this is not

the case and an equation is derived below.

The atom positions are:

Al : ClOp; 1/31 2/3,1/2.

Ti : 1/41o; ov2p; 1/21/2p; and 1/3 11/61 1/2", 5/6 11/6)1/2; 5/61 2/3;1/2.

31 (Gehlen has shown that in this structure the atom positions are not

exactly those of the DO19 structure, but that the titanium atoms are

displaced by a very minute amount, so that they in fact bind together

into tetrahedra. This would appear to indicate the presence of a

covalent factor in the bonds between atoms and this is seemingly

confirmed by the work of Collinge and Ho30

who find that the effective

22

number of free electrons drops rapidly on ordering of the lattice.

However these displacements are very small, and do not affect the

resulting structure factor calculations, unless the intensity of a

high angle line is required accurately).

The structure factor may then be written:

F = SOA,1 + exp 27-i(h/3 + 2k/3 .1- f/2)]

+ SOTi exp Tik + exp Tah + exp Ti (h+k)

+ exp 2 Ti (5h/6+ k/6 + 1/2) + exp 2 Ti (h/3 + k/6 + 4/2)

+ exp 2 Ti (5h/61-41.k/6 + 1/2)1

This may be rewritten (equation 1).

F = J

1-1 + exp 2Ti(h+2k + 101 3 7

+ + + exp 2Ti(h+2k - 11 eTi --77 (exp Tih + exp Tik + expni(h+k))]

and hence (equation 2).

F = [1 + exp 2Ti(h+2k + LT .S0Al +1OTi (exp rah + exp ilk + exp Ti (h+k)1 3 2

It can now be seen that the term in the first bracket is the structure

factor for the normal disordered close packed hexagonal cell. Thus

the conditions for a cph structure must be satisfied for a given

reflection to occur. The effect of ordering is to impose additional

restrictions on the allowed reflections as shown in the second bracket.

However it should be realised that the unit cell used here is the

unit cell of the superlattice, and further that the second bracket

does not give any condition whereby complete extinction could occur.

If equation 2 is split into two parts ie

(1) [1 + exp (h+2k + 1)1 = T

3 2

and (2 )[e Al + Se Ti exp ih + exp ik + exp i (h+k))1 =

then the conditions for a given reflection to be seen, and its intensity,

may readily be calculated. Taking * first it will be seen that the

23

condition both h and k are even gives the result

* = 00 A1 ) Any other combination of h and k gives the result

* = eAl SeTi )

Considering now(, and letting h+2k + t be equal to g, it may be 3 2

seen that

+ eig) (1 + er27ig))

=V (2 + 2cos1.(7g))

=i (2 + 2(2cos1 919 - 1))

=V (4 cos2̀.icg)

:. 61 =.1 {4 cos2tit(h+2k + 3 5,

The possible conditions are then summarised in table 2.4.

It can readily seen that on disordering, the structure factor reverts

to 4 times the structure factor for a close packed hexagonal cell

since cc2 has 8 atoms per unit cell whereas a normal cph cell has

2.- Further, fundamental lines are relatively strong, but the

superlattice lines are extremely weak in comparison, being the

difference between two scattering factors.

:2.3.3 ANTIPHASE BOUNDARY CONTRAST IN Ti3A1

Marcinkowski35

has given a detailed account of the contrast mechanism

whereby an antiphase boundary (APB) may be revealed by transmission

electron microscopy, and it is not therefore proposed to go into any

great depth here.

In.this structure, two types of APB may occur. These are antiphase

boundaries of the type as <1120> and as <1010>. The first of these 6 —6-

two is a perfect lattice vector in the disordered cell. It may then

be said to characterise only an antiphase boundary. The second type

(3)

24

is not a perfect lattice vector in the disordered cell and thus

characterises both an antiphase boundary and a stacking fault.

One would thus expect thermal APBs, those produced by ageing a

specimen so that ordered domains nucleate and grow to impinge on

one another, to be of the former type.

An APB is seen in transmission electron microscopy as a consequence

of the fault introduced into the superlattice at the APB. Hence

it is important to know the phase angle m, associated with the

fault vector R. This angle, cc, is given by the equation 38

cc = 27g.R (4)

TABLE 2.4

h + 2k L

h + 2k is a multiple of 3 odd 0

h + 2k is a multiple of 3 even 2

h + 2k is not a multiple of 3 odd i 3

h + 2k is not a multiple of 3 even - 1

h and k even = 3Se ) Ti

all other combinations ,

of h and k give c = °Ai erri

TABLE 2.5

Phase a% &e. tC•

(hkil)s

Type of reflection and structure

factor R=as <1120 > 6

R=as <1010 > —6

(A0)

(1010) elAl— feTi (S) _ Aor 0 4- A or 1- 27t 4,826 3 3

(1120) 2[ eAl - feTi] (S) Aor 0 ± A or 0 2,378

(2020) i'6A1 + 3feTi (F) 0 2A or 0 _ 730 3-

(0002) 2[ 6A1 + 3 ieTi] (F) 0 0 376

NOTE: S = Superlattice F = Fundamental

25

The contrast seen at the fault will also depend upon the

extinction distance g42. This is given by the equation:

t,Lg = 7tVc cos.0 (5) xFg

where Vc = volume of the unit cell

8 = Bragg angle

Fg = Structure factor for the g vector used

Since 0 is small this may be reduced to

g = 7cVc

(6) XFg

For Ti3Al at 25 at % this may be equated to

= 9.46 x 103 (7) Fg

Table 2.5 gives values of the structure factor, the contrast seen

for the two types of APB and the extinction distance for the first

four reflections.

The values given for the structure factor here are not consistent

with those calculated by Marcinkowski35

for the compound Mg3Cd which

also has the15019

structure. He notes however that using his

results, the extinction distances for the superlattice and

fundamental reflections are found to be almost the same. As can

be seen from table 2.5 however this does riot prove to be the case and

s is about three to five times the value of in line with results

found for other ordered structures.

In some previous work the APB vectors as <1120> and as <1070> have 2 6

been used. As stated above, the former of these two should be of

the type as <1170>. It is thought that an error has occurred here —6"

due to a confusion between the three axes and four axes methods of

denoting planes and directions. as <1120> is equivalent to (in the

three axes notation) the vector as <110>. Hence it would appear

26

that the three index notation has been used and then converted

to the 4 index notation incorrectly.

The value of cc, the phase angle, for the two types of APB are

however in agreement with those calculated in this work.

The value of m for a fault of the type as <1120> will always be 6

zero for a fundamental reflection as table 2.4 shows. However

since the as <1610> fault is an imperfect vector in the disordered 6

lattice it will be visible under some fundamental reflections as a

consequence of the stacking fault contrast.

2.3.4 DISLOCATIONS IN Ti3Al

The possible dislocations and slip systems in close packed

hexagonal metals have been extensively reviewed34'36-39

In this

section the effects of ordering on the dislocations and their motion

will be considered.

The movement of any dislocation in ordered lattice will involve

the creation of an APB. It is therefore energetically more

favourable for dislocations in these alloys to move in groups such

that their total Burgers vector is a superlattice translation. For

example it has been proposed that the as <1120> dislocations in the 6

DO19 structure will move as close bound pairs separated by an APB,

in a manner analogous to an extended dislocation, figure 2.9.

An as <1120> dislocation may move on the (0001) basal plane, the 6

1100! prism planes and the f1011 pyramidal planes. In unalloyed

titanium it has been shown that these are the most common slip systems.

However a limited number of i <1123> type dislocations have been

observed with possible slip planes of k07i1i and 11172. These

latter two systems will not be considered here. Twinning will also

(00011

W1TIA

Type Type 2 Type 1

Type 2 Type 1 y A

B

U)

(2110) Projection B

27

NORMAL. FAULTED.

eigure 2.10. showing (A) the normal HCP basal plane and (B) the plane

s a after a 6 — 41010> type fault has passed over the plane above.

A (0001) Projection

(2110) Type 1 Type 2 Type 1 Type 2

Figure 2.11 (A) Basal projection showing 2 types of (0170) planes.

2.11 (B) (7110) projection showing both (0110) and (0171) planes.

28

not be considered although a model for the twinning of the DO 19

structure has been proposed40.

The (0001) <1170> slip system

In the disordered hexagonal lattice, the as <1120> dislocation 6

may dissociate on the.basal plane into two as <1010> partials 6

separated by an intrinsic stacking fault of type two (following

the notation of Hirth and Loethe37). However in the ordered

lattice, the as <1120> dislocations will travel in pairs as shown 6

in figure 2.9. In this case the two as <1010> partials will have 6

between them both a stacking fault and an antiphase boundary. The

as <1010> APB energy is in fact higher than the as <1120> fault. 6 6 It is assumed that the most of the energy is bound up in nearest

neighbOur bonds. Consider figure 2.10. The squares are atoms

above the basal plane and the circles are atoms in the basal plane.

Figure 2.10 shows the lattice before moving the upper plane by as 6

<1010> and the figure 2.10 shows the atoms after this shear has

passed over the upper plane.

As may be seen, 2AB bonds are broken and an AA and a BB bond are

created per unit cell leading to an increase in energy over the

fault plane. Also the normal hexagonal stacking sequence is now

interrupted by an 12 type intrinsic fault layer (ie ABABAB a ABCACA).

In the case of as <1120> type fault, 2AB bonds are broken and 1AA and 6

1BB bond created/unit cell, giving an identical increase in energy.

In this case however, the stacking sequence is normal hexagonal.

Thus one would expect the as <1010> dislocations to be more tightly 6 '

bound together than the as <1120> types. Another factor that enters 6

here is that the mutual repulsion between two as <M10> type vectors 6

will in fact be lower than the repulsion between two as <1150> types 6

29

since the Burgers vector is of smaller magnitude. Observations

of the dislocations in ordered Mg3Cd have confirmed that this is

indeed the case41.

The (1010) <1120> Slip system

Slip on this system has been considered by Blackburn41. The as 6

<1170> dislocation will not dissociate on this plane, but again

due to the ordering of the lattice, these dislocations will be

expected to travel in pairs bound by an APB. Figure 2.11A shows

a basal plane projection with the 101701 planes shaded in. It is

apparent that there are two types of 01701 plane.

Type 1: Slip on this plane produces no next nearest neighbour

faulting but changes the second nearest neighbour of an Al atom

such as F from 6 Al to four Al plus 2 Ti atoms. The APB eflergy

would thus be extremely small and the expected separations thus

quite wide.

Type 2: Slip on this plane will produce 2 wrong nearest

neighbours and 4 wrong second nearest neighbours for an Al atom

such as G. The APB energy of this type will be similar to the

energy of an ad <1120> type APB on the basal plane, and hence the 3

disloCation separation should be of the same magnitude.

The <1120> (0171) Slip System

A similar arguement leads to the conclusion that there are two

types of (0171) planes (See fig 2.1113). An as <1120> type shear 6

on one plane produces no wrong nearest neighbours on the type one

plane, but does so on the type two planes. The value of the APB

on the latter type of plane is however somewhat lower than an (0001)

<1120> type APB.

30

2.3.5 DISLOCATION CONTRAST

• The visibility of dislocations observed in transmission electron

microscopy depends upon the diffracting conditions operating. It

is not intended to deal in any great detail with these conditions

since they are dealt with comprehensively in references 38 and 42.

Briefly the visibility criteria may be stated as

g b = n - (8)

where g is the operating reflection and b is the Burgers vector of

the dislocation. If the dot product, n is equal to 0 or< + the

dislocation image will be invisible. Physically this means that

the plane giving rise to the reflection g is undistorted by the

stress field about the dislocation. If n has a value> + the image

will be visible, ie there is some distortion of the relevant plane.

Strictly, equation 8 applies only to pure screw dislocations and

for pure edge dislocations it should be modified to take into

account the asymmetric stress field about the dislocation. This is

done by applying the equation

g bAu n - (9)

where u is a vector along the dislocation line. Again further

details of this can be found in reference 38.

A related problem is the contrast observed at planar faults in the

lattice such as stacking faults and antiphase boundaries. In these

cases the contrast arises due to the phase difference between waves

diffracted by the lattice on either side of the fault plane.

This results in a characteristic fringe pattern which depends upon

the phase angle between the waves (equation 4) and the extinction 38

distance in the crystal. A table of g b criteria is given in

Table 2.6.

TABLE 2.6 CONTRAST CRITERIA FOR DISLOCATIONS IN HEXAGONAL METALS

Reflection (indexed for the cph cell)

Dislocation

+ c.:0001j + ad {1070 3

_ ad 1700 3

ad N101 - 7

+ ad [1120 3

_ ad [1210 3

.+ ad C2110] 3

0170

1010

17_00

0

0

0

_ i. 3

+ 2 - 3

+ J. - 3

- 3 1.

+ .1 - 3

+ 2 - T

- 3 2

+ J.. - 3

+ 1 - -3'

+ - 1

+ - 1

+ - 0

+ - 1

1- : 0

± 1

- 0

± 1

+ - 1

0002 0 0 0 0 0 0

112-0

1210

2110

0

0

0

+ - 1

+ - 0

+ - 1

0

- 1

+ - 1

+ - 1

+ - 1

0

+ - 2

+ - 1

+ - 1

-+ 1

± 2

- 1

+ - 1

+ 1

1: 2

CAI

(A)

32

(B)

900

T 3 1../

1: (1D-0 2: a 5-1 61 3: a [121] 6-

Figure 2.13 (A) The unit cell of the Llo structure. A atoms sit on type I and IV sites and B atoms on type II and III sites. Consequently alternate (002) planes have all A or all B atoms on them.

(B) Diagramatic representation of the rotational vector. Only atoms on type I and IV sites are shown.

33

2.4 THE CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF y

2.4.1 INTRODUCTION

A brief consideration of the y structure is given for completeness.

TiAl has the L10 (CuAuI) structure. This structure shown in

figure 2.13 is an ordered fcc crystal with titanium atoms on type

and IV sites and aluminium atoms on type II and III sites. This

results in alternate (002) planes being either all titanium or all

aluminium, and hence the structure is distorted into a tetragonal

cell. This tetragonality is very small in the present case, and

the cell will be treated as cubic.

Because of the stacking of the two atom species on alternate (002)

planes, certain unusual features arise. For example, vectors of

the type 4[7011 will obviously place both A and B atoms on wrong

sites, (see figure 2.13A) and hence cause an APB. In the case of

vectors which are perpendicular to the [001] direction this does

not occur and hence no' APB is produced. This will be shown later

to affect the dislocation arrangements in ordered alloys having

this structure. As in the DO19

lattice the vector 10-1-10ii will 2 vector [ 10i]

an APB only, but vectors of the type 1/6 <112> will

characterise both an APB and a stacking fault, except as detailed

beloW. In this structure, a third type of APB is possible. This

arises because the c axis of the cell may lie along any of the

disordered Cube axes [100] [010] and as considered above [0011.

In this case two different orientations of the c axis lead to

domains that are related to each other not by a shear vector but

by a rotation of 90°, as in figure 2.13B.

2.4.2 THE STRUCTURE FACTOR OF TiAl

The structure factor for the 1,10 superlattice confirms the uniqueness

of the c axis, ie:

B

34

(A)

b

a

PLANE

a A A A t [11 0]

A\ /A\ B (111)

6 a Ti a[„2]

(C)

6

APB.SF

2

APB +SF\ \ APB SF only

[0 1ij 2

Figure 2. 12 (A) The (III) slip plane in the Llo structure.

(B) An a/2 [110] dislocation that moves on the (III) plane without producing an APB.

(C) The arrangement of a/ 2 (011.3 dislocations, showing the expected pairing, the two unit dislocations bound by an APB.

Fundamental reflections, h, k, 1 unmixed ( 246Ti

+ 2S6A4)

Superlattice reflections, h, k even 1 odd (2 i.0Ti - 210 1 Al /

In the case of the superlattice reflections, only those mixed

indices where 1 is different to both h and k occur. Hence there

is a superlattice reflection (001) but no reflections such as

(100) or (010). The phase change cc associated with the APB

types mentioned above are as follows:

Reflection Type 1/2 <101> 1/6 <112>

001

110

111

200

S

S

F

F

+ - gt

7, + _

0

0

4 9, - ___ 3

+ - it

or

or

or

or

1- -____ 3

t 27,

3

- + 2,1

3

0

0

3 _ 27c

3

2.4.3 DISLOCATION ARRANGEMENTS IN TiAl

The (111) slip plane of the Ll0 structure is shown in figure 2.12A.

a r- From this it can be seen that dislocations of the type 2 — L110.1 are

both unit disfocations in the disordered and ordered state, since

there is no APB produced by the passage of these dislocations

across the slip plane, figure 2.12B. Dislocations, such as

a, 10111, must however occur in pairs as do the as <1120> Superlattice 6

pairs in the DO19

Superlattice. However, the arrangement of the

pair as shown in figure 2.12C is somewhat different in that there

are three ribbons of fault.

r The leading partial 6 0121) does not produce an APB although it

does produce a stacking fault. The penultimate partial, which is

also of this type, does however characterise both an APB and a

35

36

stacking fault. This can be seen clearly by considering these

displacements on figure 2.12A.

2.5 MARTENSITES IN TITANIUM ALLOYS

Pure titanium undergoes an allotropic change at 882.5°C from the high

temperature bcc 3 - Ti to the hcp o Ti. If the transformation occurs

on rapid cooling, the product shows equiaxed, serrated edged grains

typical of a massive martensitic reaction. This changes normally on

alloying to the more conventional lenticular type of plate. On slow

cooling the transformation takes place by a conventional nucleation and

growth reaction.

The crystallography of the transition was deduced by Burgers43

originally

for Zr but the same orientation relationship occurs in Ti. He showed

that the transformation takes place by a shear on the !1121ff plahes in the

<111> direction (or vice versa) to give the orientation relationship.

(0001) m //el (011)p

(21I0) m//el(7,11),13

It can be seen in figure 2.14 that the shear reduces the angle between the

planes from 70° 32 to 60° to give two new 11120} m planes. The

central atom of the cell has then to be shifted in the <1010> direction to

the correct position, and further small dilations give the new m -hcp

structure. It can be seen that 1 grain will give 12 new variants (6

illotp planes with 2 <111> directions contained in them).

Barrett, Williams and Cahn44

using back reflection x-ray techniques on

iodide-titanium obtained accurate measurements of the orientation relationship.

If the Burgers relationship is followed exactly the (0001) planes of the

various variants should lie at 60° or 90° to each other (ie the angles

between the original [1100 planes). They find however that there is a

(c) (c1 Vas/3=3.12 A 3-12 310 A DA 3.12A s/

[11i) 3f0 A

P-Zr ac-Zr 5.10 A -.516A

3.5(0 A 3.12A A

Pigure 2.14. The crystallography of the

martensitic transformation (after Burgers,

Reference 43.).

38

deviation from this ideal relationship of 1.5°. Furthermore if one

<1120> is parallel to a <111> then one other <1120> direction should

+ be at 100 32' from this. The measured value was in fact 90 - 0.5.

Thence it was concluded that the (0001) is not quite parallel with

1110113 but deviates from it by about 0.5°. The habit plane was found

to be the 18,9,1213 plane and the deviation from the ideal 111243 habit

plane was assumed to be due to accommodation slip. Later work concurs

with this, showing the habit plane to be very close to 1334dp, and an

analysis of the transformation using the Bowles-Mackenzie theory has

shown that this agrees with theoretical predictions45.

A second habit plane, 1344113 has been observed however in alloys

46-48 containing the transition metals, particularly Mo and Mn. The

plates of this [34443 type, have been found by Hammond and Kelly49 to

contain a fine structure of 11011 type twins and employing an analysis

based on the Bowles-Macken2ie theory, they were able to show that this

type of martensite may be expected, the twins forming to take up the

dilation strains of the transformation. In fact each twin m/p interface

lay on a 133413 plane related so that the general effect was that the

interface lay on the 134413 plane. They were able to relate the

occurrence of this type of habit to the ratio, of the parameters of the

and 13 phase, finding that as a m/a (3 rises the twinned martensite

should become increasingly likely to form, since the dilation strains

increase.

Most of the work on Ti alloy martensites has been concentrated on the

13-stabilised alloys mainly because of their greater commercial interest

and also because the vast majority of elements tend to stabilise the

P-allotrope. It has been shown by Duwez50

that these elements tend to

depress the Ms of the pure element at a rate which is roughly proportional

39

to the fall in the p transus temperature with increased alloying

additions. In contrast to this, Clark et ar'k% have shown that the

Ms_in Ti-Al alloys rises as the aluminium content increases, again at

a rate proportional to the increase in the (3 transus temperature.

A further type of martensite has been reported in titanium alloys.

This was a fct or fcc phase reported by Blackburn52

and subsequently by

other workers53. This has been shown however to be an artefact formed

presumably by spontaneous transformations in thin foils, since no

evidence of its existence has been found by x-ray analysis of bulk samples,

although Hammond and Kelly48 were able to detect it in powder specimens

produced from thin foils. This fcc phase has an a parameter a = 4.5A°.

This is larger than the expected a parameter calculated for the close

packing of Ti atoms (4.13A°) and it has been proposed that this phase is

stabilised by interstitial atoms

Other features that have been reported in the 1330p martensite are:

1) Stacking faults, reported by Williams and Blackburn43

have been

shown to be (by the analysis of the contrast of the dislocations

at the end of the faults) intrinsic 14<10i0> type faults, and be in

the basal plane. It has been noted that higher aluminium contents

favour the formation of these faults.

2) Occasionally 11071A twins have been observed in the martensite

plates52.

3) Twin relations between martensite plates on a {10111 twinning plane

have frequently been reported in (334)pmartensite. An explanation

for this in terms of the transformation from m to p has been given

by Flower, West and Swann55.

There are in fact two ways in which this could be produced.

Consider firstly two specific twins and their parent ie

(0001) - 0171 twin 57_210

2110 .(0001) - matrix = 571°

common

(0001) - 0171 twin

and now three variants of the Burgers relationship.

2110 1

common

2 //e1171 3

(0001)

(000 1)

(0001)

1

2

3

//

//

//

(701)

(011)

(110) =

60o

60°

It can be seen that the difference between the genuinely twin. related 3ra_iilS

and the Burgers related grains is small and in the work of Flower et,al,

l it was shown that careful measurement gives an angle (59

o -2-

o - ) that is

closer to the Burgers related plates. It was thought that the plates

may form in this manner to give mutually compensating strains.

41

CHAPTER THREE

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

3.1 MATERIALS

The alloys in this study were prepared from high purity sponge

titanium supplied by Imperial Metal Industries, and high purity

aluminium (99.999% Al). The impurity contents of the base materials

are given in Table 3.1. in weight per cent.

Table 3.1 - Purity of Materials

IMI Sponge Titanium

Carbon 0.01 Hydrogen 0.002 Iron 0.02 Nitrogen 0.003

Oxygen 0.04 Sodium 0.009 Chlorine 0.14

All values are in weight percentages

Aluminium Standard 99.999%

3.2 ALLOY PREPARATION

Batches of sponge titanium were melted in a non consumable electrode

arc furnace on a water cooled copper hearth. The melting was done

under a protective atmosphere of high purity argon (at about one third

atmospheric pressure) after thorough flushing through of the furnace.

As an added precaution a titanium getter was melted prior tc melting,

the alloy. This preliminary melting removes chlorine from the metal.

The hardness of such material was typically 115 Hv(30), in good agreement

with published figures, and indicates an interstitial content of about

200 ppm. The components required for each alloy were weighed out to

± 0.0002gms in quantities to give a total weight of about 30 to 50gms.

Prior to this they were thoroughly cleaned by surface grinding, decreasing

and chemical removal of any oxide layer. They were then placed in

the furnace with the aluminium on top of the titanium and melted as

described above in a small semicircular hearth. The alloy was kept

42

fully molten for about 90 seconds and then allowed to cool. It was

then turned and remelted. This was repeated four times to ensure

homogeniety and then the "button" ingot was remelted in a rod shaped

hearth to give an ingot typically 50mm x 10mm x 10mm. The ingot was

then allowed to cool to room temperature, removed from the furnace and

reweighed. It was found that the weight changes on melting were

within the limits ± 0.06%. Since the changes were very small the

composition of each alloy has been taken to be the weighed composition.

The alloy compositions prepared for this work are given in table 3.2.

It is intended to refer to the alloys in future in terms of the atomic

percentage of Al as shown in column 1 of this table.

Table 3.2 Alloys used in the present study

Alloy Atomic per cent Al Weight per cent Al

22 22.71 13.72

25 25.07 15.84

30 29.26 18.88

35 35.05 23.38

40 40.07 27.25

41 41.04 28.13,

42.5 42.49 29.36

45 44.97 31.50

50 50.03 33.77

3.3 HEAT TREATMENT AND SPECIMEN PREPARATION.

Specimens were heat treated in vertical crusilite furnaces with

a temperature control of - 3°C on 1200°C. Alloy specimens were wrapped

in molybdenum foil and sealed in silica under a protective atmosphere

of high purity argon. The molybdenum foil is necessary to prevent

any reaction between the silica and the alloy at elevated temperatures.

In no case was any interaction found between the foil and specimens.

The alloys could be quenched directly into either iced water or

43

brine the capsule being smashed on quenching to ensure a rapid quench.

The surface of the specimen, which was inevitably heavily ta:riliSked. -

during the quenching procedure was ground off before any further steps

were taken.

Specimens were cut from the ingot using an oil cooled,

carborundum slitting wheel. The specimens were usually cut to a

thickness of about 5mm from the original 50 x 10 x 10mm ingot, this

size being the most convenient for heat treatments and subsequent

examination. After the desired treatment, three of four slices were

cut 0.25mm thick for electron microscopy specimens and the rest of the

specimen was kept for light microscopy.

3.4 SPECIMENS FOR ELECTRON METALLOGRAPHY •••

The slices described above were fixed to a flat surfaced block

with "Twinstick" adhesive tape and ground down to about 0.08mm in

thickness on a water cooled rotary grinding wheel using successively

fine grades of silicon carbide paper, down to 600 grade for final

polishing. To obtain a flat parallel sided specimen, it was found

convenient to surround the specimen with pieces of broken razor blade

during this process. In order to avoid deforming the specimens the

adhesive was softened by soaking in acetone and they could then be gently

lifted away from the block with a scalpel blade.

Final polishing was done electro-chemically using the window technique.

The solution used here was based upon polishing solution developed by

Blackburn and Williams, but the amount of perchloric acid was increased

slightly, so that the composition was:

250 mis Methanol

150 mis n-butanol

10 mis conc. Perchioric acid

In view of the danger already mentioned of contamination

44

by hydrogen (see Section 2.2) the electrolyte was cooled to below

-40°C using a methanol-liquid nitrogen bath. Under these conditions

no evidence of hydrogen contamination could be found, unless the

specimen was allowed to stay in cantact with the electrolyte after

polishing. The specimens were protected from edge attack initially

with a layer of "Lacomit" varnish, held in a pair of stainless steel

tweezers, and immersed in a stainless steel beaker holding the electrolyte

(the beaker acts as a cathode). The best profile could be obtained

with a potential of 35 volts and rapid stirring of the electrolyte. The

specimen was mounted near one side of the beaker so that the faces were

parallel to the electrolyte flow and turned through 180° every five

minutes. When the foil perforated, usually after 40 to 60 minutes, the

specimen was removed from the solution, washed in methanol and the lacomit

lacquer removed from the edges. It was then replaced in the solution,

and allowed to cool. The voltage was then dropped to 30 volts and the

foil moved slowly in and out of the solution, care being taken not to

overheat the foil. This "water-line" technique generally produces fairly

extensive thin areas where perforations joined. These thin areas could

then be cut to -ef suitable size using a surgical sc*el, after the foil

has been washed in methanol and carefully dried.

The only trouble encountered with this method was that although

with a little practice good thin areas were produced, occasionally

(especially with higher aluminium contents) the surface of the foil had

a fine "orange peel" appearance. However this effect was not very serious.

The disadvantages of this system of preparing specimens are that it

is relatively slow taking up to 11 hours per specimen and also, even

with extreme care, some damage of the foil is inevitable when cutting

a specimen to put into the microscope. For these reasons, it was thought

that it would be preferable to prepare disc specimens for insertion

directly into the microscope cartridge. In this case a thick ring of

unthinned specimen protectS the actual thin foil from damage. In the

45

!Ilk\ '41-1

,7 , I ; T • \ rff VI e • / / • / / •

• W ./.4" `\ ,

777.-2

\\:\

k* S t I LS ..sttS.

141111°'

PTFE Stainless steel

Fig. 30l The jet polishing apparatus.

With the polisher in the open position, the specimen is placed onto the

platinum anode (A) and on closing the two halves, the specimen is clamped

in position. The electrolyte flows by gravity through the inlets ,(I)„

through the jets (s) and returns to the circulating pump via the outlets

(0). On perforation of the specimen, the light emitted from the bulb (L)

is transmitted through the windows (77) and detected by the infra red

sensitive photocell (P/c) which operates a relay cutting off the polishing current.

46

later stages of this project therefore a jet polishing device was

developed following lines already found successful in these laboratories

for the rapid preparation of Fe-Al, Cu-Al-Ni alloys. This polisher

is described in the next section, and has been successful in that

polishing time is reduced drastically to about 10 to 15 minutes. The

thin areas however are not usually as extensive as in a good foil

produced by the window technique, and hence it was not used extensively.

3.5 A LOW TEMPERATURE JET POLISHER

In this laboratory a jet thinning device for the rapid routine

preparation of several different alloys had been developed and full

56 details are available elsewhere. Briefly a disc of a suitable diameter

to fit straight into the microscope cartridge is electropolished whilst

being jetted on both sides with fresh electrolyte. At perforation, a

light source triggers a photocell which switches off the polishing current.

The specimen is then removed, washed and dried. However, as pointed out

in the text, it is necessary to polish titanium alloys at low temperatures

(below - 40°C). Hence the polisher described in the work above had

to be redesigned to take electrolytes at this temperature. A diagram of

the original polisher is shown in figure 3.1 and of the developed version

in figure 3.2 The points that arise are:

(1) In the second version advantage is taken of the fact that a clear

electrolyte is being used and hence a teflon membrane could be employed

instead of the glass window used in the first version, where a semi-opaque

electrolyte (Chrome-Acetic acid) was used. As can be seen this simplifies

construction considerably.

(2) It was thought to be more convenient to construct a holder for the

specimen that could be separated easily from the body of the polisher.

This makes insertion of the specimen easier, and also washing of the

specimen when it has perforated since it may be removed and dipped

Figure 3.2

The Modified Polisher.

(A) Showing the complete unit.

(B) A close up of the specimen holder.

47

48

straight into a wash bath.

(3) A cooling tank has to be provided. In this case a cooling

reservoir is used containing 250 mis of solution. This reservoir is

dipped into a Dewar of liquid nitrogen, to a depth of about 10 Cats

up the body. In this way the electrolyte could be cooled to below-50°C,

but continuous circulation prevented freezing of the electrolyte in

the tank.

As far as the actual construction of the polisher is concerned,

the only major difficulty was the marked shrinkage of the teflon on

cooling (1.5% on cooling from room temperature to -196°C)'. This was

taken advantage of finally, by machining the teflon pieces oversize,

freezing them in liquid nitrogen and then inserting them into the stainless

steel body. On heating up, the teflon expands and gives an excellent

seal between itself and the steel body. The specimen holder was also

machined a little over the dimensions given to allow for shrinkage in

use, and to give a good seal.

Another practical difficulty was the use of a pump to circulate

the cold, corrosive electrolyte. It was found best to use a peristaltic

pump, and the tubing most resistant to attack by the electrolyte proved

to be silicone rubber tubing. This tubing did perish, but if after

use the system was flushed through with clean methanol, a reasonable

life could be obtained. However the life was considerably shortened

by allowing the electrolyte to remain in contact with the tubing.

This material also remained adequately flexible at low temperatures.

3.6 SPECIMENS FOR LIGHT MICROSCOPY

The light microscopy specimens were ground on successive grades

of silicon carbide papers down to 600 grade and then f.inelly electro-

polished for about five minutes as described above. They were then

49

etched in a solution. containing:

3 mis Hydrofluoric acid

20 mis Nitric Acid (cone)

100 mis Distilled water

The best results were obtained if the specimen was just dipped

in and out of the solution for about twenty five seconds and then

washed with water after the surface had apparently been overetc'ied.

The specimens were then examined and then repolished and etched,

and re-examined.

3.7 EXAMINATION OF SPECIMENS

Thin foils were examined using either a Siemens Elfracdp I or a

modified AEI 6G electron microscope. Standard techniques including

dark field microscopy, selected area diffraction and two beam analysis

of structural defects were employed. Optical microscopy was carried

out using a Reichert projection microscope.

PJA/KR

50

Ate

CHAPTER FOUR

EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

4.1 Introduction

In order to discuss the results obtained without needless repetition,

it has been decided to present the work in relation to figure 4.1 the

phase diagram that has been drawn as a consequence of the observations

made. The results will therefore be split into relevant sections dealing

with the microstructures of each part of the diagram. In the course

of this investigation no other phases were observed other than m, m2

(Ti3Al), and y (TiA1).

4.2 Alloys Quenched from them Phase Field

Alloys which at the ageing temperature had been in the 0(phase field

were readily identifiable using the electron microscope. When examined,

the microstructure was found to consist of small antiphase

(APR's) having a diameter of typically... 150A°. This structure is shown a

in figure 4.2., which also shows an analysis showing them to be s 6

<1120> type APB's. Such APB's have a phase angle m = 29tg.R of 7t under

the reflection used. Hence the reversal of the contrast observed in

figures 4.2b and c shows that these faults must be of this type rather

than as <1070> faults. It was of course obvious that the faults must 6

be of the former type since at no time was displacement fringe contrast

found with a fundamental reflection as would have been the case with

the latter fault. The small size of these APB's suggests that they

have formed on the quench from the ageing temperature. The superlattice

reflections were always present, quite strongly, in diffraction patterns.

It was not possible to suppress the formation of ordered domains with

the quenching methods used in this study. Notice that the boundaries

lie randomly, not on any specific plane in the foils.

51

The extinction distance y see table 2.040for reflections producing APB

contrast was found to be usually of the same order as the thickness

of the foil, and hence one would not expect fringes to be observed at

the APB's. Very broad fringes could be observed in the APB's when

the value of s (the deviation parameter) was not equal to zero. Also

when the alloy composition deviated from the stoichiometric composition

the APB's could be seen in dark and bright field micrographs taken with

strong fundamental reflections due to the anomalous contrast produced

at the boundary. This effect became more marked as the aluminium

content increased.

4.3 Alloys Quenched from the ( cc-Fcc2) Phase Field

Specimens quenched from this region at high temperatures had a morphology

as shown typically in figure 4.3. There are regions (A) in which no

APB's could be imaged despite the fact that selected area diffraction

showed that they were ordered, and the regions (B) where APB's identical

to those discussed above are seen. Similar reasoning to that above

,leads to the conclusion that the areas (A) were fully ordered at

temperature whereas the (B) areas were disordered. Note that the APB's

in regions B terminate at the dislocations in the interface between the

=and «2. This effectively shows that they are of the type as <117)> 6

dislocations. The appearance of the precipitate shows that it is

ellipsoidal, being extended in the [6oq « direction. This is most clearly seen in figure 4.36 which shows the structure of a 16.5 atomic

% alloy aged for 67 hours at 800°C, and quenched. As can be seen this

alloy is in the(oc+ce2) region to room temperature, and thus the ordered

cc2 precipitate appears bright when imaged with a superlattice

reflection, and the matrix being disordered does not.

52

Examination of these alloys by light microscopy failed to distinguish

between all cc and (cc + m2) structures. In general the small size of

the m2 particles would have precluded direct resolution of them 2

particles with light microscopy. No noticeable change in etching

characteristics of cc, + cc2) and all= 2 alloys could be detected

that could be used reliably to detect the limits of these phase fields.

4.4 Alloys Quenched from them 2 Phase Field

The structure of this phase was confirmed both by x-ray and electron

diffraction to be of the DO19 type. If aged at high temperatures the

structure was comparitively featureless as in any single phase material,

and selected area diffraction gave very strong superlattice reflections.

From this it must be concluded that each individual grain is a single

antiphase domain and that it is highly ordered.

Alloys quenched from them phase field and then subsequently aged in

the ce2 region at about 800°C showed growth of the APB's. No

systematic study of APB growth rates was undertaken, but it was found

convenient to use low temperature anneals to grow the APB's to a

reasonable size for analysis of the vectors in the initial stages of

the project. However it was found that APB growth in this system was

unusual in that subgrain boundaries appeared to be preferential sites

for the nucleation of large APD's, leading to complete annihilation of

APB's about the boundaries before significant growth had occurred

within the grain.

4.5 Alloys Quenched .From el* 4 Phase- 1 ie4

When examined by light microscopy these alloys showed, at both 25 and

22 atomic %, a mixture of large and small,martensite plates, as can be

seen in figure 4.4. Examination in the electron microscope showed that

these two had different internal structures. The larger plates

53

("blocks") although relatively dislocation free, contain numerous

stacking faults which normally ran right across the grains, but

frequently ended at dislocations within the grain. These faults

were shown by slip trace analysis to be lying in the basal plane

and contrast criteria showed that they are of the type as <1010>. 6

Consider figure 4.5. This shows the faults as observed under three

different reflections ie 4.5a, gs = 2420, 4.5b g = 0222, and 4.5c

g = 2202. The table below shows that these reflections give the

following contrast conditions.

7470 0222 2202

RsX 6

+ 2wg.R

loTO

0

01 TO

2A

-ITO()

2A

loTo

2A/3

01 TO

n/.3

1Too

21t/3

loTo

21/3

01To

25v3

1Too

47/3

Visible NO NO NO YES YES YES YES YES YES

This is consistent with the faults being of the type as <1010>. 6

Although the faults are generally found to lie in the basal plane,

evidence of "kinking" could be seen as in figure 4Xd, where it can

be seen that the-fault also lies on another plane, which has been

identified by trace analysis to be of the type 110T11 -.71207e" m2.

When the faults were first observed, several specimens were examined

taking great care to ensure minimal damage to the foil, to prove that

the faults were not introduced by careless handling. It was found

possible in all of them to distinguish between the small inevitable

amount of induced damage and the faults described above. This together

with their consistent occurrence must mean that they are genuine

features.

54

As can be seen from figure 4.6 the other form of martensite consists

of "bundles" of plates separated by low angle boundaries. (Selected

area diffraction over a large area such as in figure 4.6a shows a single

well developed diffraction pattern, and a dark field micrograph such

as 4.613 shows that several of the plates appear bright with one

reflection. These facts together with the extremely small displacement

of bend contours over the boundaries indicate that they are of the low

angle type).

Within the plates randomly distributed arrays of dislocations was found.

Two beam analysis of these dislocations (figure 4.7 ab ) shows that

the majority of them must be of the type as <1120>, but that some of 6

them have a Burgers vector, which contains a c component ies< 1123>

■ 3 or c (0001). They must in this case be of the type c <pool', being

visible with an 0002 reflection but invisible under 1120 type reflection.

Dislocations of the type as <1123> would be visible under both 6

reflections g.b being 2 and 2 or 1 respectively. The presence of an

occasional as <1123> dislocation cannot be conclusively discounted in 6

all cases however. Stacking faults in these plates were rarely seen

especially as the aluminium percentage was increased. Figure 4.66 shows

an example of one such fault found. Trace analysis shows that this

fault lay on the basal plahe and once again contrast criteria established

were consistent with it being of the type as <1010> . 6

This type of martensite was found exclusively in alloys having been

quenched from the (m + p) phase fields.

In all the alloys studies there was no evidence of retained p, all the

diffraction patterns obtained being indexable in terms of the

hexagonal cell. Despite this the habit plahe for the martensite has

been shown by a trace analysis technique to be of the type €334 1p.

55

This involves making two assumptions. Firstly that the plate

boundaries are parallel to the original 1 habit plane, and secondly

that the Burgers orientation relationship (see section 2.5) is

followed. By measuring the orientation of the intersection of the

plate boundary with the foil surface in several specimens using

trace analysis and a hcp lattice stereogram, the hexagonal indices

of the plate normal may be found. This is then transferred to a

composite stereographic projection of the cubic p- and the m phase

and the cubic indiv.es determined. To within 20 this was found to be

the pole of a [339 f-3 plane.

The final observation of the lenticular martensite concerns the

observation. of twin related plates. Figure 4.8 c,b,o, show respectively

the diffraction pattern and two dark fields taken from the same region.

Figure 4.8.0t was taken using reflection 1 and 4.86 with reflection 2.

Figure 4.8d, the key to the pattern shows that there are in fact two

patterns, both having a common [1011lm plane, and the initial impression

is that they are ,twin related (hence the matrix and twin notation).

Careful examination of the diffraction pattern shows that they are not

perfectly twin related, but that a rotation of about 3° about the zone

axis has also occurred. One further point is that i10111 m twins

within the plates, reported in several titanium martensites, were not

observed in these alloys.

4.6 Alloys Quenched from the (m ±L3 ) Region

Very: little need to be said in addition about alloys quenched from this

region. As stated above the lenticular martensite was exclusively found,

and the microstructure simply showed this martensite and the a phase.

It was found that the (4 around the transformed p had a similar but not MM.

so dense array of dislocations of the as <1120> type, due presumably 6

to the transformation stresses. This dense array did not penetrate far

into the untransformed m.

56

4.7 The Possible Peritectoid Reaction (=2 + 13)-4 m

The possibility of such a reaction occurring was checked by ageing at

successively higher temperatures, and examining the microstructure of

alloys in this region both by light and electron metallography. At

all times it was found that there was a region of disorderedok between.

the ( ) and (a2 -1-(r) phase fields shown on figure 4.1.

4.8 Alloys Containing the y Phase

Alloys containing greater than 40 at % aluminium were found to have a

two phase structure as shown typically in figure 4.10. These two

phases were identified by electron and x-ray diffraction as being

(depending upon the ageing temperature) either m or =2 and the yphase

based on the compound TiAl. The morphology of the precipitate was not

affected by the degree of order in the hexagonal phase at the ageing

temperature (figure 4.10b and c). At all times the ywas found to be

fully ordered having the Llo (CuAu )structure. No APB's were seen in

the yphase and hence each plate must be a single domain. The

precipitate has.two variants about the [1111 twin plane (figure 4.11)

and A definite orientation relationship was found ie

(0001) cc/Al [111! y

<1120>oc //el <101> y

The habit plane was found to be the (0002) =plane.

The precipitate is partially coherent with the matrix and figure 4.12

shows the interface between =2 and y phases. In the case of the Moire

fringe contrast the interface has been imaged with g = 1120. Hence the

fringes are due to [11201 and [110! plane mismatch.

The lattice parameters of a 40.5 atomic per cent aluminium alloy were

measured by x-ray diffraction. The results of this are given in table

4.1. Using the d value obtained for the [1170! plane, the d for f110

The observed mismatch would correspond to a necessity for as <1120> 6-

dislocations to occur about every 220Ao. At times, the observed

planes was calculated using the formula 42

X = {d1120 d110 - 4.1

d110 d1120

Where X = the measured Moire fringe periodicity. This gave for

X = 160.5A° a value of d110 = 2.83A° which compares well with the

value obtained by x-ray diffraction.

As can be seen from the x-ray figures there is an expansion of about

0.69% along the c axis, together with a contraction along the close

packed directions of 0.969/for <1170> Pel<101> and 1.5% for <1170>//el 0

<110>. In all cases the mismatch is small, and the interface would be

expected to be semicoherent.

5'7

dislocation spacing is between 200 and 250A°, but at others, complex

dislocation arrays were observed at the interface. In some instances

the boundary between the two phases has been found to have lengths of

...1000A° in which no dislocations could be imaged. The dislocations

considered here were, as far as could be ascertained, of the type as 6

<1120> . Despite the important role played by the splitting of these

dislocations into partials in the formation of they plates, and the

low stacking fault energy as shown below, partial dislocations were

. not imaged at the interface of perfect y platelets.

The morphology seen in figure 4.10 develops extremely rapidly at high

temperatures. For example a 42.5 atomic % alloy aged at 1200°C for 15

minutes shows a well developed lamella structure. In order to follow

the initial precipitation of the y therefore, ageing treatments at

lower temperatures were tried. In practice 800°C was found to give a

reasonably rapid but controllable precipitation rate. Further since

the 40 atomic % alloy could be quenched from the all cc or allm 2 phase

58

fields into the cc2 +yphase field, this was the alloy which was

principally studied, and further comments refer to this alloy.

The precipitation rate of the y alters with temperature as follows

(see figure 4.13). At low temperature (below--650°0) the reaction.

is extremely sluggish, very few faults occurring even after prolonged

( >50 hours) heat treatments. Above this temperature the process

speeds up tremendously but rather than thin plates forming dense arrays

of stacking faults are seen. These form rapidly as shown in figure 4.14

showing a 40 atomic % alloy quenched from 1150°C and aged for (a) 5

hours (b) 1 hour and (c) 2 hour at 800°C. (Figure 4.11 is a diffraction

pattern taken from a sample as in 4.14 (a) and typical intense streaking

perpendicular to the basal plane due to the faulting is seen). The

faults do not grow together or coalesce to form unfaulted plates with

longer ageing times.

Above-.950°C rather than this dense array of, faults, thin perfect

plates of yare seen, and as the temperature is raised the width of the

plates increases.

. A point discussed in Chapter 5 is that when quenched directly to room

temperature and examined no faulting was observed whereas with slow

cooling some faulting was seen.

The faults are of the type as < 1010> , and from short time ageing it 6

could be seen that they nucleate preferentially at subgrain boundaries

and to a limited extent from grain boundaries. They also occur by the

splitting of the unit dislocations in the grains (figure 4.15).

59

Each group of faults was found to be made up of faults all having

the same specific as <10.50> fault vector. This is demonstrated in 6

figure 4.17, where figure 4.16a is taken with full 0001 zone pattern,

showing all the faults. Figure 4.16b however is taken with a two beam

condition with g = 1120. As can be seen one set of faults has

disappeared effectively. The g.b criteria for g = 1120 with the three

as< 1010> dislocation vectors shows, that two will be visible and one 6 invisible. Thus all the faults in this one bundle must be of the same

type. Another noticeable effect in the bundles was an alternate wide-

narrow spacing is seen between them in the basal plane.

Specimens containing y plates were aged at temperatures above the oc+ y

transus, for short periods in order to observe the reversion behaviour.

In these it was found that reversion tended to occur by the plates

shrinking back, and the broad edges of the plates had a characteristically

ragged appearance, figure 4.17. In a few cases however networks of

as <1120> dislocations were found lying in the basal plane as in 6 figure 4.18. An-analysis of these faults is difficult owing to the

necessity of obtaining a foil with an L0001] foil normal. Only with

this orientation is a complete analysis possible. Such an analysis is

shown in figures 4.19 and 4.20 for the network shown in figure 4.19,

and a diagram of the net in figure 4.21. Note the symmetry of the

network and the identical radii of curvature of all the nodes.

From these nodes, the fault energy of the as <1010> faults,y1010, 6-

can be calculated, and from the straight segments a measurement of the

as <115D> fault energy y 1120, estimated. For the calculation of y1010 6 the equation due to Friedel 57 has been employed ie

y = Gb2 lnR / - (4.2)

60

Where G = the shear modulus

b = the Burgers vector

R = 1'adius of the node

E = cut off radills = b

A value for the shear modulus of Ti3 Al is not available, and hence the

value for pure titanium, G = 3.5 x 1011 dynes will be assumed. The

other assumed value is that of the cut off radius E., which will be put

equal to the value ofT s <1010> dislocation Burgers vector (1.7A°')..

The radius of the nodes was measured from an enlarged print,at a total

magnification of 166,500 times and an average value of 1,336A° (-1---50e)

was obtained. No correction for projection effects is necessary since

the net was imaged with the basal plane parallel to the photographic

plate. Using these values a value of y 1010 equal to 7.27 ergsAm2 was

obtained.

The inaccuracies in this determination are discussed in the next chapter.

For the calculation of y 1120 the equation due to Read 58 is used ie

y 1120 = Gb2 P--a--2a col - 4.3 ( 1-a

Where b = the Burgers vector

a . Poissons ratio

d = the separation between dislocations

9 anjle_ be:I-toter, tine a-total Gmomil on and ids Again the problem arises that no value of Poissons ratio is available,

and the value for pure titanium has been applied (a = 0.361). The

value of 1120 was found to be 114 ergsAm. Note that although there

is a small separation into partials it is assumed that the stress fields

at the distances involved are equivalent to as <1120> dislocations. 6

61

.4.9 The Peritectoid Reaction cc+y-*Gc2_

In the region shaded in figure 4.1, microstructures such as those

shown in figure 4.22 are seen. This shows an apparent three phase

region ofoc+ =2 +y. Such microstructures persist even after ageing

for in excess of 50 hours and are seen right across the compositional

range from > 40 at % to 50 at % aluminium. The explanation of this

effect is discussed in the next chapter, but this together with the

evidence of the rising value of the ordering temperature are taken

as circumstantial evidence for the existence of the proposed

peritectoid.

62

TABLE 4.1

The lattice parameters ofC 2 and at 40.5 at % aluminium

Observed d spacings

(e)

Hexauonal Reflections 0 DO19

Cubic Reflections L1o

4.98 10710 (s)

4.059 001(S)

3.374 1071 (s)

2.876 1170 (s)

2.832 110(S)

2.489 2020

2.321 0002 111

2.192 2021

2.028 002

2.006 200,020

1.695 2022

1.439 2240

1.428 202.022

1.421 220

1.308 2023

1.248 464o

1.223 2242 113

1.212 ---- 131

1.204 4641

1.163 222

1.157. 0004

0.9707 4643 313

DO19 ; a = 5.764 c = 4.630

C/a 0.803

Llo a = 4:020 c = 4.058 c/a 1.009

Cu k radiation = 1.541A° at 18°C 0(

ati

O

z H

TEM

PERA

TURE

63

4w

30

4c)

50

ALUMINIUM (ATOMIC PER CENT)

The Proposed Phase Diagram for the Titanium-Aluminium

System between 25 and 50 atomic per cent Aluminium

0.2pm

D,F: /30/1200/20 +800/50 25/1125/21) 13.F

30/1200/20 +800/50

05pm

D.F.

4(2)

D3;4„- i. t1;4 10','N. ..,. - ) • • i . +, •

ir4- 4 A . .4 ."4-

e \-....‘' ,.., 00* .. 1, asir ir- - - ...,--7 4 • ••••: 11,& r

1•‘:- lk , +4 1 N 0. . 't . L j,e; .46 it . ' 1 4 4 , , s ?, .3. .'4.,

ir i 4, - -I. . b.'. ,,,a. - 1 • ■ •)-- — •-.4 is•-& ' T • . •• ... _ \

,

r — 1- • 'i - _ . -.i ........ • 4.s., .• ''.

... 3 ,... -

:"1-.1:1.- '"%■•:::%"7"--3P-''". , 1. • 9 •

- ,

.;.-...0. ■;:.N.P.IL-13- r ,.. ' - . - :•• a , ..,t ,......„

. N. ...7 1 , ' • ' ...,

1. N. .. . .. %-• 1.4 :. .. 4 - . :Izr?' ' 0511m -• -_-*--- - .... "'..i.:

40/1200/20 DF

(a) Typical structure of alloys quenched from the at-phase field.

(b) & (c) The lt reversal of contrast expected of as <1170> APB's.

(d) The absence of typical stacking fault contrast which again shows the APB's are of the type as <1120> (Compare with figure4.15)

64

• 0-• maw- 7 . • -..

--Z-N4aitka kb • - • " I

• e'.A1 Air'%4 it I • -

• '

4i3 'k* .44 4/L1.. sit cji

/14

25/1100/20

1.1 04 440

■• .4t*,&7 -

411 4t

'31.. ■At , I.NeA Ay` ,-TOlk4

itt • 4.r.

0.5 µm

,

'

35/1160/20

B

NISK 16.'800/70

4(3)

Specimens quenched from the (CX+0C2) phase field have

structures as shown above. Note the strong anomalous as contrast shown by the 7 <1170> APB's in (c).

65

4(4)

A

Light micrographs showing the structures obtained by quenching from the fit phase field. (a) shows the "block" martensite found in low aluminium content alloys, and (b) the more typical martensite in commercially pure titanium

66

4,;,,,stramosasinixamingnava.

C D

---="■•••• •

111M

45)

22/1250/20 as A

as A aS A

An analysis of the stacking faults found in the block martensite. The invisibility criteria established are described in the text, and are consistent only with the faults being of the type as <1070?

67

11111/1aw 30/1250/20 BF

DF 22/1150/20

A 0,

DF 22/1250/20 Electron micrographs of the more familiar lenticular titanium martensites. This figure shows (a) a typical area, (b) a dark field micrograph illustrating the small misorientation at the boundaries, and (c) a stacking fault of the type as <1010,

68

4(7)

22 /1250/ 20

BF

iwo

As A.

BF A two beam analysis of the dislocations in the lenticular martensite which shows the majority to be of the type as <1120>

Again the contrast conditions are described in the text.

69

•• • •

• • • •

zoz%!

A B

25/1150/ 20 DF 1 As A DF 2

C D

S.A.P.P. of A and B

An illustration of the "pseudo-twinning" observed in these martensites. Note the small deviations in perfect angular relationship ( `-^ 3°) in (c).

70

(13)

a 15 urn

22/1150/20

5pm

4(9)

22/1150/20 x150

As B The structure of samples quenched from the (C441) phase field. It can be seen that the tangled <11a)). dislocations occur in the untransformed oc, but that the density drops off rapidly. Hence they must be due to transformation stresses rather than quenching stresses.

71

C

4(10)

A

41/1150/110

x300

45/1100/20

BF

45/12 50/20

DF

Typical microstructures of the ot + y region. Note that the degree of order in the matrix (b and c) does not appear to affect the morphology of the precipitate.

72

0 0 V / pooT •

/ Ili

0 - 0 0 • llQ L

4(11)

• •

• •

2022

O

2020 E •

O 0 0 • ❑

0002 Ftli,IfT 0 OID 0

❑ • 0 0 • 0

0 0

A diffraction pattern obtained from an area such as is shown in Figure 4. The intense streaking of the spots is due to the faulting, and the presence of two twin related)/ orientations can be seen clearly.

73

45/1050/20 BF

0.5pm

402)

42.5/1200/5

DF As B

DF

The otA interface shown in (a) Moire fringe contrast and (b) and (c) more complex interface structures.

74

1µm

4(13)

The effect of temperature on it precipitation can be seen by comparing the structures obtained after 0.5 hours

at (a) 700 , (b) 800 and (c) 900°C.

211 m

BF 40/1150/20 + 800/1

BF 40/1150/20 + 800/

0.5[1m

40/1150/20 + 800/5

4(14)

The effect of time can be seen by comparing the structures

found on examining specimens aged at 800°C for 5 hrs,

1 hr and - hr respectively.

76

40/1130/ 20 4. 800/0.5 BF

40/1200/20 * 800/12 mins.

y,.

♦,

0 5 M

BF

The splitting of dislocations to give the g platelets, (a) at sub grain boundaries and (b) at dislocations within the grains. Not all the latter separated, because they do not have a section lying in the basal plane.

) ;

77

05µm a

41

40/1150/20 4. 800/12minutes

4(16)

An analysis showing that the dislocations within a group

are all the same type, ie are all characterised by the

same [1010] vector.

78

40/1050/20 +2/1150

B

AK

0-5µm

As A BF

BF

4(17)

/ 0.5µm

As A BF

The reversion of i takes place by the contraction of the plate in the (0001) plane. The structure is typically "ragged" at the edges, and dislocation "debris" is left behind.

79

02µm

40/1050/20 +1150,17 B.F.

As A BF.

0.4m

B

4(18)

Two complex dislocation networks at the receding tip of a reverting ' platelet. Note the anomalies in the nets and also that all the nodes are extended and have identical curvature.

80

4(19)

A

An analysis using reflections of the type g = 1120 . In this case only two of the three

<1010> partials are visible In each micrograph. In the first case g = 2110, and the missing dislocation has the vector as [0150] .

Similarly g = 1210. The missing dislocation has the vector b = 7-[101C]

Finally the third reflection used, g = 1120 , and the invisible dislocation has the

r vector as LiToqj

Compare these figures with the diagram overleaf.

81

4(20)

A

THE ROSETTE PATTERN

The operating reflection is g = 1100 and the missing dislocation has the vector a [1120]

20,000 x 2

The operating reflection is now g = 0110 and the invisible dislocation has the vector as C21100 Y

B

C

Finally the third dislocation, as [1210 1210] is absent under

the reflection g = 1010

82

A diagram of the dislocations making up the regular portions of the networks. The anomalies are dealt with in Chapter 5, where a.discussion of the nodes is also included.

vi)

83

BF 41/1175/20

1µm-S

BF 41/1175/50

4(2 2)

Structures found about the region in reaction is proposed. There appear ie OC,CX and if coexisting, due to ordering reaction being very slow in range.

which the peritectoid to be three phases, the kinetics of the this temperature

84

85

CHAPTER 5

DISCUSSION

5.1 CONSIDERATION OF THE PHASE DIAGRAM

5.1.1 The Phases Observed

No evidence has been found in this study of any other phase other than the

solid solution (m), Ti3 Al (0:2) and Ti Al (y). The presence of p (the bcc

solid solution) at the annealing temperature is inferred from the observation

of martensitic min quenched samples. No p could be retained in the alloys

studied.

This is in agreement with all the most recent investigations of the system

with the exception of the work of Sato and Huang.19

Despite their claim

that a high temperature phase .5 of unspecified crystal structure existed that

could be retained on quenching, no suchiphase was detected in this study.

5.1.2 The Possibility of a Peritietoid Reaction

Because of the controversy about the possibility of a peritectoid reaction

( p-f-tx2) m occurring in this system a careful study was made in this area

of the diagram, involving both quenched and slow cooled specimens(2°C.per min fror

the annealing temperature). Before discussing the results two points must

be re-emphasised. -Firstly Crossley has shown that the two phase syndrome may

have a marked and confusing effect on microstructures observed in samples

quenched or slow cooled through the (cc-4-13 ) region. Secondly the more

indirect methods employed.in previous studies make it difficult to assess theactu

ordering temperature precisely.For example a problem with this proposed reaction

is that no crystal structure change would be involved in a peritectoid reaction

f3+m2

m and despite a variety of claims by certain investigators to be

able to distinguish by etching between m andm2

metallographically it was

found in this work not possible to make a positive distinction between the

two using various etchantS.(Those techniques that involved prolonged immersion

in strong acids should obviously be avoided as has been shown in section 2.2(2).)

The extremely rapid ordering kinetics of them2 phase would again lead to

confusion, since room temperature X-ray diffraction studies on quenched sairples

86

will give misleading indications that the sample was ordered at the

annealing temperature.

The evidence in this study24

of the system firmly supports the form of

diagram proposed by both Blackburn and Crossley21 This evidence can be

summed up as follows. Firstly electron metallography has shown that a

disordered region of m always occurs in between the (m+04) and(m+(3)phase

fields in regions where a peritectoid reaction has been proposed previously.

Secondly no evidence of the peritectoid microstructures found by other

workers has been observed. It is significant that all the works, without

exception, which propose such a diagram have used heat treatment regimes

which have been shown to give rise to gross segregation in them+ p field.

This is particularly clear in the diagram of Clark et al amd must be the

reason for the miscibility gap they claimed existed. One can in fact correlate

this gap approximately with the width of the (0=4-p) phase field.

These results also show that the diagram due to Blackburn24 is substantially

correct since the ordering temperature has found to be far in excess of the

ordering temperature proposed by Crossley21,22 and in good agreement with

the values obtained by Blackburn and other workers. (Chapter 2).

There is the alternative that the differences may be due to different impurity

levels. However this is unlikely since the modern studies have all been

performed on material of comparable impurity levels. The most likely impurity,

oxygen, is not expected to have any marked effect at the levels encountered.

As already pointed out the work of Tsujimoto and Adachi28 on the ternary system

Ti-Al-Co must be regarded with some caution since cobalt is an extremely

potent /3 stabilizer, and fractional percentages may well have a marked effect

on the phase equilibria, especially bearing in mind the narrow temperature

gap between the (m + p ) and (01c2 m) phase fields.

5.1.3 Antiphase Boundaries (APB) in Ti Al 3

In agreement with previous work on superlattices having the DO19

structure

the antiphase boundaries in this material have been found to be of the types

87

as as <1120>(thermal APB's) and -76.<1010>(formed by separation of <1120>

N 24,41 dislocations into partials).

The grown;in APB network showed no preference to lie on specific planes in the

material after extended ageing, which indicates that the APB energy in the

material is isotropic in contrast to some ordered systems where a strong

preference is shown for the APB to lie on specific planes, due to the

anisotropy of the APB energy.35 It was shown by Blackburn41

that the APB

energy calculated as a function of the number of wrong nearest neighbour

bonds created at the fault is comparable on both the (0001), the f01101 and

thef0171Iplanes. However he also showed that there are two types of101101

and 10111 plane. The type mentioned above and also a second type on .uhich

there is no nearest neighbour faulting, merely second nearest neighbour

faulting. It is therefore conceivable that these latter planes might have

been preferred, but this does not occur.

The .2 <1120> superdislocation pairs seen in these alloys are always very

tightly bound together, so much so that careful study is required to show

that they are in fact paired. This could be deduced from the high ordering

temperature of thec42 phase, itself indicative of a fairly high ordering energy.

No separation of - as

<1120> dislocations into partials was observed except in

the special case oftheliphase precipitation discussed later.

No study of APB growth in the material was made. However it was found in

confirmation of prior work24

that the sub-boundaries in the ordered material

appeared to be the site for the preferential growth of APB's leading to

morphologies as shown in this paper. The reason for this effect is obscure,

but there seem; two likely explanations. Firstly that enhanced diffusivity

in the region of the boundary enables preferential growth to take place there.

However one might expect if this were true that grain boundaries would be

better sites than subgrain boundaries but this does not appear to be so.

Alternatively the explanation might be in terms of the climb of dislocations

near the boundary, or even from networks at the boundary leads to Preferential

annihilation of some of the APB's. This would also apply to other ordered

88 systems however, and no similar effect has been reported in other alloys.

The APB's in the system could be easily imaged using anomalous contrast

(i.e.imaging with a strong fundamental spot in either bright or dark field)

when the composition deviated from stoichiometry. This is due to the

rejection of excess aluminium atoms from the growing domain to the boundary,

a tendency which would be more marked as one deviates further from

stoichiometry as was indeed observed. Evidence for such a rejection has

been obtained by Swann59 who showed that APB's at which anomalous contrast

was observed were preferred sites for the nucleation of precipitates. The

successful analysis of this anomalous contrast due to Gemperle et al,6o '

61 is

also based on the segregation of atoms to the APB producing a strain in the

lattice so that the ideal fault vector R is replaced by a new vector equal

to (R + 8) where is a small increment in R due to lattice strains.

5.1.4 The Ordering of Ti3Al

The ordering of the cc2 solid solution to Ti3Al has been shown to be first

order, as in the case of Mg3Cd,62 since there is a two phase region of

(«t-a2) between the and cc phase field. The temperature at which ordering 2

occurs, taken as the temperature of the « 4. (cc +cc) transus rises rapidly up to 2 2

about 30 atomic % aluminium and then more slowly up to the proposed peritectoid

(«+y) -. cc reaction at 1210°C. 2

This present study confirms the cursory investigation made by Blackburn ?

There are however points of divergence. The (a+ 2) region at about 25 atomic

% and upwards is much wider than in the original proposed diagram (figure 2,4)

of Blackburn24 The temperature of the (cc+cc )4cc transus also is shown in

2 2

ref.27 to be at a constant temperature as the aluminium content increases

whereas in the present case it has been shown to rise continuously. Also the

value of Tc seems at all points to be above that proposed by Blackburn by

approximately 30 to 40oC. However despite these detailed differences which can

be reasonably explained by the differences in the completeness of investigation

the general form of both diagrams is identical. It is not clear what

Blackburn's41 extension into the («2+y) region signifies, and he does

89

not attempt to explain or make any hypotheses about this region of the

equilibrium diagram. However this is discussed below (5.1.5.)

Returning to the stability of the Ti3Al based «z phase, it is interesting

that no maximum at the approximate 25 atomic % aluminium composition is found

in T. Exactly parallel behaviour is found in the Mg-Cd63,64

system for the

DO19

Mg3Cd compound, and is unusual in ordered alloys.

If one assumes that firstly that as one deviates from stoichiometry, aluminium

atoms in excess of 25 atomic per cent substitute only on the titanium sub-

lattice sites in a random fashion and no vacancies are produced and secondly

that the ordering temperature Tc is directly related to the number of A-B

bonds (i.e. unlike neighbours' bonds) then a possible explanation may be affected.

Let the probility of an original titanium atom being aluminium equal p,

as one deviates from the A. yomposition.

Considering figure 2.8, the number of nearest neighbour bonds between the

1+ atoms in the centre and their twelve nearest neighbours can be shown to

be 24AB bonds and 24BB bonds where A is equivalent to aluminium. Note there are

no aluminium-aluminium bonds.

If all the B atoms now have a probability p of being A atoms, then an AB bond

must now be writtenp-B = A PAA 2

P AA 4(1-P)2 2p(1-D P

BB - BB —)AB

if Thence at stoichiometry the total bond numbers = 24 (AB + BB)

As one deviates this becomes:

N = 2 2 -J4.13 + (1-) + p AB 2p p 2

1 AA P 2 + (1-p) AA (1-)AIN

+ (1+2p)(1-p P BB N = 4P+P2)AA 1-(1- )2 )AB7(

As can be seen, as p increases, the number of Al-Al bonds increases, the

number of Ti-Ti bonds falls and the number of Al-Ti bonds increases.

(1-p)AB_and a BB bond must now be

90

Table 5.1 Variation in AB, BB and AA bond numbers (divided by 24)

Atomic %A. 3o 35 4o 45 50

p 0.0666 0.1333 0.200 0.266 0.333

No AB bonds 1.058 1.095 1.120 1.124 1.111

NO BB bonds .8711 .750 .64o .538 .444

No AA bonds .071 .151 .24o .338 .444

The variation in AB bond numbers would appear to predict fairly accurately the

observed behaviour of the Ti3A1 phase. The value of Tc

rises as one fills

the aluminium sublattice until it is completely filled at. 25 atomic per cent.

It then continues to rise very slowly as the introduction of further aluminium

atoms on the remaining titanium sublattice sites leads to a slight increase

in the AB bond probability, falling away again as the number of AB bonds starts

to fall. Likewise it can be shown that the transformation from cc to (a +,0 which 2

occurs at 40 at % aluminium might occur because the number of AB bonds in the

alloy can be increased again by this separation into two phases. The Mg-Cd system

has a similar DO19

to orthorhombic transformation (Mg3Cd to Mg Cd).62 In this

system which shows_a very small negative deviation from ideal behaviour the

treatment just proposed predicts very accurately the ordering temperature

variation with composition.

Hence in the present alloy system the variation of the AB bond probability shows

good agreement with the variation of the ordering temperature T.

Strictly one should consider the bonding energies not the number of bonds.

However the ordering temperature Tc is proportional to the ordering energy

which may be represented using the Bragg-Williams65 approach as

Tc = lEAB 4 (EAA EBB))

where C is a constant and E1. is the energy of an i-j bond.

Since at Tc

the value of EAB should equal 1(EAA EBB) i.e.there is no preferred

interaction, Tc will be proportional to the number of A-B bonds.

91

5.1.5 The Peritectoid reactionm y a 2

The microstructures obtained in the shaded region of the phase diagram (figure 4.1:

are shown in figures4,224,q.As can be seen, the microstructure consists of an

apparent mixture ofm,m andy. However such a phase equilibria cannot exist

in a binary system. An explanation of this effect might be that the alloys

are microsegregated but this seems unlikely since a) no evidence of such

segregation has been found in other specimens and b) this microstructure is

found after prolonged times (50 hours) at temperature. Alternatively the

precipitation ofy might be suspected of altering the composition locally, but

again there is no consistency in the occurrence of them or m 2 regions (i.e. one

does not find for example the disorderedm around the y platelets and the m 2

between they).

The only explanation that one can convincingly propose is that the kinetics

of the ordering reaction are extremely slow in this region, and that this is

so because one is very close to the ordering temperature. Hence it is proposed

+ that a peritectoid reaction occurs at 1210° 15o cc+yil- cc.2One cannot, on the

evidence presented here exclude the possibility that the (cc '4, m +m ) 2

transus rises above this temperature to a maximum and then drops to give a

entectoid reaction cc 2+ •y at about 40.5 atomic per cent aluminium for example.

5.2 OBSERVATIONS ON THE MARTENSITIC p.+(xTRANSFORMATION

_5.2.1 Morphology and Habit Plane

The martensite in these alloys is very similar to the martensite in pure

titanium66 Contrary to the usual alteration in martensite morphology from

plates separated by low angle boundaries to the more lenticular martensite

found with most other common alloying additions, the morphology does not

.change at all even at high alloy contents (>25 at %). Presumably this is because

the aluminium is an mstabiliser, not (as are most other additions) a p

stabiliser. The work of Clark et al51

showed that aluminium raises the

Ms

of titanium, presumably because either aluminium alters the energies of

the two phases so that the driving force for the transformation rises and the

92

reaction takes place at higher temperatures, or that the addition of

aluminium reduces the strains involved in the transformation allowing it to

take place at a higher temperature.

Before considering the observations made, it is worth making some simple

calculations of the effects of aluminium additions on the parameters of the

cc and p phases. It will be based on the lattice parameters given below.

a parameter of f3 Ti at 902°C a parameter of cc Ti at 25°C c parameter of <:c Ti at 25

oC

= = =

3.33A° 2.950A° 4.683

The values of a and c for a obtained by Goldak and Parr at 25 atomic per cent 14

aluminium are: 0

a = 5.77A at 25°C

c = 4.62A° at 25°C

From figure 2.14 the crystallography of the transformation involves the

transformation of the cell of heightal2 into a hexagonal cell of height c.

In pure titanium, these values area,i2 =, 4.725A° and c = 4.683A°. Hence the

ratio aPli2/c = 1.01. Thus there is contraction of %"1% involved in the p--)

transformation. At 25 atomic % aluminium, the value of c = 4.62A°.

No values of a py have been determined experimentally and hence it is necessary

to calculate the parameter. It is assumed that the value ofapcan be calculated

arithmetically (i.e. the system is ideal). The closest distance of approach of

aluminium in pure aluminium is 2.86A°. Assume that as the aluminium atoms are

placed on a lattice with a co-ordination number of 8, they contract by 3%67.

This means that its radius in p-a.i will be 2.78e.

Therefore the c.d.a. of an "average" atom will be given by

c.d.a. = x 2.78 + * x 2.89) A°

= (0.69 + 2.167)A°

= 2.86A°

Thence the a p' parameter at 25% Al = 2 x c.d.a.

= 3.30A° Thence the value of ap /2/c = 0.99

93

Thus the addition of aluminium must successively reduce the contraction

involved in the transformation, until eventually it leads to an expansion

being necessary, inAhe (0001) direction.

The other value which is of interest is the ratio moVal3. These values are

respectively 0.887 and 0.876 in the pure Ti and the 25% Al alloy.

These approximate calculations show that the addition of aluminium to the

titanium lattice has two effects. It reduces both the magnitude of the dilation

strains in a direction parallel to the c direction and also the value of the

ratio a«/,r. In the light of this the observations made may be explained.

For example, it was shown that as the aluminium content increased, the

density of dd ‹1070> stacking faults decreased. Such stacking faults are 3

fairly frequently seen in pure titanium martensite, but were relatively speaking

uncommon in these alloys. Faulting on the basal plane will reduce the dilation of

the transformation in the (0001) ((Oil>) direction. However if tne dilation .L

stress in the transformation falls, then the stacking fault density would also

be expected to fall.

The absence of [10711m twins within the martensite plates may also be explained

in terms of the explanation put forward by Hammond and Kelly49 based on the

- - Bowles-Mackenzie theory. They show that the internally twinned martensites

having a f3441p habit plane may be explained in terms of a minimisation of

transformation stresses. For the specific case considered, they found that the

observed macroscopic (434)3 habit plane was made up of a zigzag interface made

up of alternate (473) F and (745) (3' interface as shown below.

Such a twinned morphology effectively cancels out the stresses of each of the

two [5541 13' habits, and would only be expected to occur when the stresses

involved are high. They show here that this occurs as aola,P increases. In this

9 4 case as has been shown aloove,a„oc/ap falls. Hence one would not expect

110711mtwins to occur, in agreement with the observed behaviour on these

alloys. The same is true for the Ti-Cu68

system at low copper ,contents and

again in this system no twinning was observed.

5.2.2 Twin Related Plates in Ti-Al Martensites

The simplest case of diffraction patterns from twin related Crystals 42

occurs when the twin plane lies parallel to the electron beam. The

twin axis must then lie in the reciprocal lattice plane which corresponds to

the diffraction pattern. In the present case the possibility of twinning

about the flOTlimplane is to be:considered. Hence a diffraction pattern

which contains a 1107f1lmreflection will satisfy this requirement.

In this sample case, the diffraction pattern from the twin can be obtained

by simple rotation. A rotation of 180°,:about the twin axis is identical to

a mirror image of the matrix pattern across the twin axis, and hence having

indexed the matrix the twin reflections are easily identifiable. A necessary

consequence of this is that the twin reflections must occur in straight lines

parallel to the normal to the twin plane, and must also lie on the straight

line joining up matrix reflections parallel to this normal.

A cursory inspection of figure 4.8d seems to indicate that indeed there is a

twin relationship between the two crystals from which this pattern was obtained.

However a closer examination makes it clear that this is not the case, since the

twin reflections do not lie in the same line as the matrix reflections. In

fact it is apparent that there is a rotation about the zone axi:, of 3°. Hence

the f10111(xplane of the apparent twin can be considered to be rotated by 3o

from the pseudo twinning plane of the matrix, and not exactly parallel to it

as would be the case for a genuine twin.

If the plates were related by the Burgers relationship such a small rotation

could be expected. Consider the case of two plates sharing a common L]120j

direction in a 25 atomic % Al-,alloy which has a c/a ratio of 1.602. The

angle between (0001) and the (7(101)0c plane in this case is 61.6° (cf 61.23

for pure Ti).' Assuming the Burgers relationship, the second (0001) plane

95

would be at 59.5° from the first. Rotation of the (1101) plane normal by this • ... —

amount shows that this plane now deviates only 2.7° from the original (1101)cc

normal of the first plate. This then shows that the angular rotation measured

from the diffraction pattern above is consistent with the Burgers relationship

having been obeyed, and the two martensite plates which give rise to the

diffraction pattern shownin figure 4.13d are not twin related.

5.2.3 Dislocations in the Martensite

As shown in section 4.5, the dislocation sub-structure in the martensite plates

as consists of random arrays of <1120> dislocationswhich make up the

Majority of the dislocations, and a small fraction of c(0001) dislocations.

In other titanium alloy systems, the c(0001) dislocations have been found to

have long stright segments lying in the <1170> direction and be edge in character.

Because such dislocations have not been observed in mechanically deformed alloys

it has been proposed that they are a product of the transformation. In these

alloys no such strong tendency has been observed. The random ad <1120> 3

dislocations are frequently seen in the titanium alloy martensites and have

been assumed to arise from a combination of quenching and transformation stresses.

Such a hypothesis is supported in the present work by the observation that in

alloys quenched from„thecc+p region the m phase has a very low dislocation

density except in regions adjacent to the transformed p where the dislocation

density increases markedly up to the density in the transformed p. This strongly

suggests that most of the dislocations are produced by transformation stresses,

rather than quenching stresses or as a consequence of damage to the foil by

handling.

5.2.4 The 'Block' Martensite

A point has already been made in the results section that the morphology and

internal structures of the blocky grains of c formed in the 22 at % alloy quenched

• from 125000 are completely different to the "subgrain" martensite. Such a

substructure has not previously been reported in the literature, but Flower69

has observed some featureless grains not like the normal martensite in pure

titanium specimens.

96

The microstructure shows features that might be expected of a massive

transformation.70 The boundaries are of the high angle type and, rather than

the dense dislocation tangles observed in the martensite, the substructure

consists of the long stacking faults shown in figure/4.5

Because of the confusion that surrounds the term "massive" in the literature

I wish to define more closely the terms massive transformation and phase,

and massive martensite as I use them. The term massive martensite should be

attributed only to transformation products which occur as the result of a shear

:type of transformation. These have the characteristics that there is an

observable surface rumpling and that the product phase does not cross the original

matrix boundaries. However a massive transformation is one in which the

product phase grows by the movement through the parent phase of an interface

which corresponds to a high angle boundary. The parent is converted by a short

range diffusional process at this boundary to the product. It follows therefore

that such a transformation can cross grain boundaries in the parent with ease,

and further that no surface rumpling should occur. (It has been pointed out that

..a surface rumpling may occur if the volume of product and parent phase were

sufficiently different)70. The product in this case is a true massive phase.

The term massive martensite has often been used to describe the martensite

product which up until now I have described as 'sub-grain martensite', in which

a large part of the original grain is converted to a single variant of the

product, consisting of the parallel plates separated by low angle boundaries.

The vast majority of work on titanium alloy martensites is related to alloys

containing the pstabilising elements. The common feature cf all these is that the

Ms falls, and that the martensite morphology changes from massive through lenticular

to acicular (as for example in the titanium copper or titanium molybdenum

systems). In the case of aluminium it has been shown51 that theMs increases with

increased aluminium content.

It is proposed in this case that the rise in the Ms temperature may mean that

the athermally produced nucleus is able to grow by a diffusional (or massive)

process, rather than by the shear (or martensitic)mechanism. Aspointed out above

the diffusion needs only be short range in order that over the boundary between

El 7

the , and m phases the atoms are rearranged from the bcc to hcp lattice structure.

No composition change would be necessary.

The duplex massive plus massive martensite structure may arise in one of two ways.

1) The first nuclei that form grow rapidly by diffusion, but nuclei forming at a later

stage in the quench transform martensitically or

2) The first martensitic transformation gives out sufficient energy to allow

some of the remaining p to transform diffusionally.

The sequence of events might be represented by the sequence;

titanium + m stabiliser P-÷m massive + massive martensite

titanium p--)m massive martensite

titanium +p stabiliser p lenticular martensite

The critical experiment in this case would be the observation by hot stage microscopy

of the growth of.the suspected massive phase, and observing whether it is confined

within the original pgrain boundaries or whether it is able to cross them. All that

can be said on the evidence available is that the block product may well be a massive

product.

The stacking faults in these large grains are not unusual excepting the observation

of apparent cross-slip onto the planes of the type f107T.IL from the basal plane. The

difficulty encountered here is that the ad <1010> faults should not occur on this 3

plane. In the figure showing the kinking of the faults it can be seen that in case A,

a dislocation interaction occurs at the end of the fault lying on the 110111 plane.

In case B, no such interaction apparently occurs, but this may be due to the contrast

conditions being such as to give invisibility.

A possible vector that could be proposed to give rise to this fault is ad <1012 > 3

A dissociation which gives such a fault is given below.

ad ad 2.1 ad 7 [11203 - -7 [16-123 + C01703 + — [0002] - (1)

3 3

(1071) (000l)

The difficulty here is the high energy of the ad C1012) dislocation. The energy 3

balance of this equation is given below.

27a2 a 41a2

27 27

+ 9a2

27

8a2

27

98

However in titanium zirconium martensites some contrast evidence has

been obtained which is not inconsistent with faults characterised by a

vector of the type na <161-2>.71

The examination of energies produced by atom matching on the {10111 plane

in this work indicates thatil is equal to 27 not -1. No possible

dislocation reaction to form this vector is proposed. This does present

one possible explanation.

The alternative explanation may be that these are small .10103type twins.

However no diffraction evidence for twinning was obtained, and hence no

definite conclusion can be reached.

9 9

5.3. THE PRECIPITATION OF ‘6,

5.3.1 Introduction

The orientation relationship between the two phases, i.e.

(0001)c4

.2 //el

11111 y

<1170>o:2/ell. <110>y

together with the observation of 'stacking faults in the m2 matrix are both

evidence for the transformation being identical to that observed in

elemental cobalt72, 73 and its alloys,74 and other alloy systems such as

Cu-Ge,75 Al-Ag76 and Cu-Si.77,78 In cobalt the transformation may be

achieved by the passage of a/6 <112> partials over every other close packed

plane, and the crystallography is identical in the case oX the transformations

in the alloy systems. In cobalt this reaction may be regarded as purely

martensitic, the fcc phase being converted into the hcp by a homogenous

shear of s = W2 in the <112> direction on a 1111 plane. If this shear

were homogenous, only half of the atoms in the new structure will be in

the correct position as is obvious since the primitive cell of the new hcp

lattice has two atoms per cell compared with one in the primitive fcc cell.

However the atom shuffles necessary are simplified since they may be achieved

if, as suggested above, 1111 planes are considered to be locked together

in pairs. In elemental cobalt this mechanism adequately describes the reaction

and in the DO19

to L10 transformation the basic crystallography is identical if

the ordering of atoms is ignored.

In any alloy system, some diffusion must be involved in order to attain the

equilibrium concentrations of the parent and product phases. One might

imagine this occurring either concurrently with the separation into partials

or the separation occurring first followed by diffusion to enrich the faults

to the equilibrium y composition.

In the other alloy systems mentioned above, stacking faults are always

observed in samples quenched from above the fcc hcp transus, and it is

frequently proposed that the stacking fault energy (SEE), which is positive

but small above the transus goes to zero,73 and then becomes negative at

100

temperatures below the transformation temperature (Tt). However it seems

more likely that in every case although the SEE is low, it does not become

negative below Tt

which would correspond to the separation then diffusion

case above. If this were so, then there would be very small barrier

energetically for the dissociation process, and all dislocationsin the lattice

should dissociate to give the intermediate non-equilibrium faults. It would

also mean that just above Tt

the dislocations should show some dissociation.

In the case of Al-Ag76 which has been studied by in situ hot stage microscopy

by Hren and Thomas, it was shown that the a/2 <101> dislocations were not

dissociated at all at temperatures just above Tt since they were able to

cross-slip. When quenched to below Tt, they ceased to move, paused, and then

dissociated and the partials spread out on the (1111 plane.

They concluded, from kinetic data that this process was diffusion controlled.

In Cu-Ge,75 Kotval and Honeycombe showed that deformation at room temperature of

a metastable fcc phase quenched from above Tt produced dense faulting

indicating that the fault energy is very low. Such fault bundles did not

however give hcp reflections, but subsequent ageing at 400°C ','0.5Tm) for less

than 5 minutes produced the missing hcp reflections. They also found that the

transformation occurred very rapidly at high temperatures and slowed down very

quickly as the temperature fell.Both in Cu-Ge & Cu-Si75'77faulting is seen at

room temperature after quenching from above Tt. Kinsman77 et al have

suggested that the quenching stresses are sufficient to separate the unit

dislocations with low SJE. In both cases the melting point is relatively low

(Cu-Ge: Tm

1125°K, Tt = 1075°K at 12.5 Wt % Ge, and Cu-Si: Tm = 1173°K,

Tt = 1073°K at 5.09 Wt % Si) and T

t sufficiently high so that significant

diffusion may occur during the quench. Thus it is felt that diffusion

enrichment rather than quenching stresses are responsible for the extensive

separation observed in these alloys. These examples may be realistically

compared with air-cooled Titanium Aluminium samples (TITI 1770 Tt = 1400°K)

especially when the effects of the ordering of the reaction described in the

next section are considered.

1,01

In conclusion therefore, although the transformation in cobalt may occur entirely

martensitically by the passage of a/6 <112> (a/3<1070>)partials over every

other close packed plane, in alloy systems (although the, crystallography is

identical) there must be concurrent with this shear a continual enrichment

of the faults with solute atoms. It does not necessarily follow that the

final equilibrium concentration is reached immediately.

5.3.2 The Effects of Order on the Transformation

Alternative ways of stacking L10 and DO

19 layers, and their relative energies

are now considered. The tetragonality of they phase has been shown by X-ray

diffraction to be very small (table 4.1) and hence this will be ignored.

It should be remembered however that because of the ordering, directions of the

type <110> differ from directions of the type<101> (Section 2.4). In the

DO19 structure however all three <1120> and <10710> directions are equivalent.

The change in nearest neighbour bonds between planes only will be considered,

in order to assess the energy of a given arrangement, apart from any stacking

fault energy. This latter energy will be considered to be constant whatever

the atom arrangement.

Firstly consider the DO19 lattice. Two DO

19 layers are shown in figure 2.g)

and serve to illustrate the method used to assess energies of various

arrangements.

Counting nearest neighbour bonds shows that between the A and B plane there are

6BA + 6BB bonds. One must of course always count for a complete basis such

as the 4 atoms in the B plane, to get a true value.

Having done this it can be shown that if the B plane is sheared over the A

plane by any of the vectors El, E2 or r3 to give AC stacking, that the bonds now

total 4Bg+ BBB +

Figure 2.13 shows two Llo layers stacked one on the other.

The bond total in this case is 81111 2flff+ 2BB, and if sheared by r2 or r

3 this

changes to 4 BA + AA + BB.

102

The interesting feature is when one considers an L10 plane stacked on a

DO19 plane. The total bonds are now equal to 7BA + 4f1A+ 1BB. This

stacking produces more AB bonding than the D019/D0

19 stacking in figure210.

Shearing by r1

the L10 layer over the DO

19 layer produces no change but the

r2 and r

3 shears, gives a total of 5BA + + 2BB.

Stacking Normal +r1

+r2

+r3

DO19/D019 6BA + CAR 4BA +74R+1BB as r1

as r • 1

L10 /L10 8BA +21141+2BB as normal 4(BA+BB+11-#) as r2

D019/L10 7BA +44A+1BB as normal 5BA+5/141+2BB as r2

In the above examples both the 1,10 and DO

19 structures have been taken

at the stoichiometric composition. However it is possible to calculate the

number of AB, BB and 1I bonds in a non-stoichiometric D019 alloy'at 40

atomic per cent aluminium by using the method employed in section 5.4.

If this is done then one obtains the result at 4o atomic %

D019

/D01 6.729B+ 1.44BB + 3.84AA

b) b019/Do19 + r

1 or r

2 or r3 5.44E14 + 2.08BB + 4.404

If one considers stoichiometric L10 over DO19 at 40 atomic % aluminium the

results are:

c) D019/t10 and D0

19/t10

+ r1 6.8BA + 2BB + 3.2AA

D019/t1

0 + r

2 or r

3 5.2BA + 2.8BB + 4.01*

Finally if the Llo structure is also considered to be non-stoichiometric then

an aluminium lean 1,10 plane over a non-stoichiometric DO

19 plane will have the

following nearest neighbour bonds:

103

e) DO19

at 40/1,10

at 40

and D019

/1/10

+ r1

6.48BA + 2.16BB + 3.36iNk

f) DO19

at 40/1,10 at 40 + or r2 r3 5.52Bil + 2. 64BB + 3.84Aii.

These results show that the effect of non stoichiometry in the matrix on the

energy required to separate unit dislocation into partials falls slightly due

to the fall in the degree of order in the lattice. The other feature that

emerges is that an 1,10/D019 interface at 40 atomic % aluminium has a very

similar energy to normal D01„/D019 stacking.

as ConSider then DO

19 matrix at 40 atomic % aluminium in which as <1120 > 6

dislocation has started to dissociate into 2f<10701>partials. There is a

decrease in Ti-Al atom interactions within the fault compared with the matrix.

However should the alloy be aged at some temperature where significant diffusion

can occur, then since there is a chemical driving force for the transformation

there will be a net flux of aluminium atoms into the fault. Comparison of c

and e show that this increases the number of Ti-Al bonds across the fault plane

and will hence reduce the energy of the fault, which can then separate further

apart. The fact that the o(2phase has a very high ordering temperature suggests

that the aluminium atoms diffusing in will tend to adopt the site giving the

maximum number of AB bonds. Concurrent with this aluminium flux into the

fault there will be a corresponding increase in the titanium atom numbers in

the adjacent DO19

planes, which will also aid this process. The fault will

not therefore be hampered in growing within the basal plane and does in fact

result in a decrease in the ordering energy which counter balances the stacking

fault energy.

At high temperatures as just described the dissociated partials can move rapidly

over the basal plane. This is a process that gets more difficult as the

temperature is lowered until finally the energy needed to form a stacking

fault and an APB in the DO19

matrix without diffusion occurring to enrich the

5(1)

1 11

(0001)

(a) The dissociation into partials of the AB dislocation lying on the basal plane, to give a 'T' junction. This must be forbidden since the APB will then terminate within the crystal.

(b) An type junction, with the partial oB at the inter- section of the (hkil) and (0001) planes.

104

105

fault is too high, and the dislocationscan no longer dissociate. Also one

would expect, as is observed, that the quenched samples would show no

faulting since insufficient time for diffusion occurs, whereas the aircooled

samples show some faulting because a little diffusion occurred. This

argument also explains the extreme rapidity at which faults form at temperatures

of about 800°C ( 0.55 Tm) and above.

5.3.3. Dislocation Dissociation in the cc2 Lattice

The heterogeneous nature of the precipitation process has been pointed out

earlier, and nucleation takes place both at individual dislocations in the

grains, when they have a segment lying in the basal plane, and at subgrain

boundaries. Both such sites would be expected to be surrounded by a higher

aluminium concentration than the lattice. This would occur not so much due to

relaxation of the stress field about the dislocations but because of the

chemical interaction described by Suzuki79 and the enrichment of the

nucleation sites is clearly seen in the case of dislocations in the APB

networks, due to the anomalous contrast it produces.

In other hop F fcc transformations the unit a/3 <1120 > dislocations simply

split into partials. However in this case the ordering has an effect on this

as behaviour. For example the dislocations at which 7 <1120>type APB's

terminate will split into partials. This separation must not result in the

APB ending within the crystal. Because of the random orientation of the APB's

it is difficult to see clearly just what occurs. It would seem that the

separation takes place as in figure 5.18 rather than as in figure 5.111

resulting in an "L" junction not a "T" junction. The separation of the

7 <1120> dislocation into partials must lock this junction in position

so that movement is only possible by a diffusional process.

Considering now the separation of a superdislocation, it has been suggested

above that because of the high L10 ordering temperature the aluminium atoms

as they diffuse to the faults sit in the sites that give maximum AB bonding.

5(2)

DO19 D0,9

A cr- a- B A -AI,Ti on A o,0..A1,Ti on B

The dissociation of a superlattice dislocation on the (0001) plane. The A plane (dark circles) is arranged with atoms in the DO19 lattice positions. However, the B plane atoms (open circles) have either the DO19 or the Llo arrangement as indicated. It can be seen that the two different Llo stackings that occur, assuming the mechanism proposed, are related by the rotational vector R from the diagram underneath. This shows the Llo structure in the cen4,re with the four sublattices labelled. The outer two cells show the actual orientations of the two different Llo orientations formed by the two different vectors Acr and scr B, as they move outwards.

106

1.07 as The two outer <1070> partials of the superdislocation if they move out

from the parent, must have different aluminium atom sites filled to meet this

criterion since they have different shear vectors. The two different

arrangements of aluminium atoms are related to each other by the rotational

APBVectorHdescribed in section 2 i.e. the C axis changes direction by 90°.

The inner two partial dislocations will be left as a dislocation of the type

a/2 (101) at the interface between the two types of stacking. (See Figure 5.2)

5.3.4 Growth of the 6 Platelets Normal to the Basal Plane

It is obvious from the results that separation of the dislocations to give

faults (the nucleation stage) is difficult at low temperatures (600°C) for

the reasons discussed above, but it becomes more rapid as the temperature is

raised above this level. However the propagation of the faults on successive

(0001)04 planes to give plates rather than individual faults (the growth stage) 2

would seem difficult, and not until the temperature is raised further does this

occur. Such growth cannot proceed by a diffusional mechanism8° and indeed has

been shown in several systems to be independent of long range diffusion. Three

basic mechanisms have been proposed to explain the growth of the phase normal to

the basal plane. These are

1) The Pole mechaniSM (81 - 83)

2) Spontaneous nucleation of loops at the interface (73)

3) The ledge mechanism (84)

It should be emphasised that on this point there is only circumstantial

evidence for any mechanism since hot stage microscopy was not possible,

precluding any direct observations of the reaction.

Briefly these three different mechanisms suggest firstly that a partial

dislocation moving through the lattice meets a suitable "pole" dislocation

and that it spirals up and o.ownitto give a plate of fcc material. Such a pole

in this case would be the C(0001>dislocation.The objections to this theory

have been discussed elsewhere85

in some detail and hence will not be dealt with.

The major objection centres around the crossing of the two arms of the partial

at a narrow separation after one revolution. The second mechanism involves

108

the nucleation of a pill box of the newphase at the hcp/fcc interface;

the edges are glissile partials of the correct vector to give the necessary

shear. Finally the ledge mechanism involves the nucleation of partials

at some point such as the edge of a plate or at any other local stress

centre. These sweep over the interface.to advance it one step height,

for each dislocation that moves across.

In this particular case the mechanism occurring must basically explain the

extreme rapidity of the growth to give perfect unfaulted platelets and the

fact that any one fault bundle is characterised by one particular fault

vector. Both these facts strongly suggest that the pole mechanism is the

one which occurs in this case, sincesuchamechanism explains easily the '

reason for there being one fault vector associated with a bundle and the

rapidity of growth. In the other two cases there seems no reas(,n why a

random selection of all three as/6 <1070>dislocation should not be nucleated

unless local stress conditions made one particular shear energetically more

favourable than the other two.

Indeed successive nucleation of the same fault vector leads to an accumulative

shear being built-up in the lattice the back stress from which would tend to

suppress this process.

Again, once the inherent barrier mentioned above is overcome, the pole

' mechanism should operate extremely rapidly until the back stress built up

forces it to stop, or the pole dislocation ends or lies in another direction.

. Pole dislocations have not however been actually observed in previous

electron microscopy studies72

or in the present case. However this may

be the to experimental difficulties. It has been shown that dislocations of

the correct Burger's vector, C<0001>,do occur, and at times it seems the

as/6<1010>partials do have the appearance of lying on a spiral ramp.

Recent work by Kinsman et al77 and Tien et al78 on the precipitation of K

plates in Cu-Si alloys also point to the pole mechanism being the operative

109

transformation mechanism. The former workers found that the K plates grew

in sudden micron size jumps (liin0.4- seconds) indicating that they grow

rapidly over atomically very large distances. In Tien's work, electrical

resistivity changes were used to obtain data on the kinetics of reaction

and hence its activation energy. They showed that for temperatures just

below the transus, the evidence was consistent with the pole mechanism

but at a lower temperature another unknown mechanism also occurred.

Therefore it is thought that the pole mechanism is responsible

for the growth of the yprecipitate, normal to the basal plane but it

may well be that one or both of the others also contributes to the thickening

of the yplates normal to the C plane.

PJA/KJB

ST=±0001

••••••■••••••••••■••• •.•••••••••■•■■__ tolTo---_ I11-071

tif2o 2110

AR faces are planes of the type .110Ill

Berghezans Bi-pyramidal representation of the dislocation vectors in the close packed hexagonal lattice. The plane ABC corresponds to the basal plane. The relevant vectors are considered in the text.

110

I 1 1

5.4 THE NETWORKS OBSERVED IN REVERTED yALLOYS

The network of dislocations observed in these alloys and shown in Figs 4.19 - 4.22

are most conveniently discussed using the bipyramidal represetation for

dislocation vectors in hexagonal metals as proposed by Berghezan et al.86

8 This representation which is based on the Thompson tetrahedron

7 used for

fcc metals is useful since intrinsic and extrinsic faults are easily

distinguished and its use facilitates discussion of the dislocation inter-

actions. (Although it could be easily modified to take account of the

ordering of the hexagonal lattice, this would result in a somewhat clumsy

notation)

Briefly, the common dislocations found in this lattice can be represented

thus:

24 <1170> by ± 3

<1010> by 2:

-a-ci <11 2:23> by 3

AB, BC and CA..

AaBT and C0

AS, BS and CS'i AT, BT and CT;

As was pointed out in Chapter 2, the ordering of the lattice leads to the

pairing of dislocations of the type AB into superdislocations of the type

AB + AB bound together by an APB of the type AB. Pairings of the type

AB + BC will produce the third APB, Dissociation of the unit dislocation

AE into partials may be written:

AB = Ar + c7 B (1) or

AB = aB + (2)

In the hexagonal structure which is formed by close packed planes stacked

abababab... dissociation (1) may be defined as producing an intrinsic fault

b

c &d

5(4)

The effects of ordering on a Basal Plane Network:

(a) the arrangement of hexagons with and without AB

(b) as A, but allowing the dislocations to move together to minimise APB energy

(c) Possible dissociations at the points marked extrinsic and and intrinsic in (B). (d)

112

1 1 3

on the a plane. IL therefore follows that dissociation (2) produces an

extrinsic fault, on the a plane. However on the b plane, the same"

dissociations produce the opposite faults i.e. (1) gives an extrinsic fault and

(2) an intrinsic fault.

dissociation Plane (a) Plane (b)

AB = + crB

AB = uB + Au

When the lattice orders these partial dislocations will also- produce an

AO type APB as was also pointed out in Chapter 2.

The combinations of unit and partial dislocations in the ordered alloy are

tabulated below.

Dislocation group

AB

AB + AB nil

AB + BC AC type APB

AB + Au

Acrtype APB + Intrinsic fault

AB -F'crA

orA type APB + Extrinsic fault

AB + Ca

Intrinsic no APB

AB +* orC Extrinsic

It was shown inBerghezanispaper that hexagonal network were produced on'the

basal plane in zinc by the interaction AB + BC 4 AC. However in an ordered

alloy such a reaction will produce a network in which some of the hexagons

contain APB and others do not (Figure 5.4 ). If one allows the APB energy to

be minimised by the contraction of the network as in Fig 5.4.13, then the

network approaches the final result seen in Fig 4.19. One need only now

dissociate the nodes to give the final result.

Resulting fault ' (all on the a plane)

AB type APB

There are however two ways in which this could be achieved as shown in

Figs (5. k .0 and (5. h.d). Firstly the result observed, and secondly one

5(5)

The cross-slip mechanism whereby all the nodes become intrinsic. (a) The dislocations constricted at the contracted node, (b) Cross-slip having occurred on ilOTO. planes the as <112o> dislocations now dissociate on the B

game, giving an intrinsic fault.

114

115

in which alternate nodes have been allowed to dissociate to give the AB +

fault.

Considering the first case however it can be seen in Fig 4.19 that all the

nodes appear to have about equal radii of curvature. In the net shown in

figure 5.4.b. however'the nodes must alternately intrinsic then extrinsic

then intrinsic as one goes around the hexagon. This may mean that the

intrinsic and extrinsic stacking fault energies are roughly equal. The

extrinsic fault, which has the stacking sequence ababacbaba has two

surfaces of APB a-c and b-c as against the one surface in the intrinsic

fault which leads to a stacking sequence ababacbcbcb, leaving only the APB

a-c. Thus it is felt that this is unlikely, and that an alternative

explanation must be used to explain the apparent equality of fault energies.

A possible explanation is that the extrinsic fault energy is less than the

intrinsic fault energy by enough to balance out the ordering energy, but it

has been shown theoretically and experimental in fcc metals that these two

energies are roughly equal. Thus this is not thought to be a valid explanation.

The only possible solution would appear to be that they are in fact all

intrinsic faults. This can be envisaged as follows. All the unit AB

dislocations are lying in screw orientations. This means that they lie at

the intersection of the (0001) plane and an 101101 prism plane. The

dislocation can cross-slip onto this plane as long as it is not dissociated -

into partials, which happens at the constricted nodes and the three dislocations

can cross slip so that they now lie in the b atomic plane (c/2 up). If they now

undergo the dissociation 553 + ACT they will bound an intrinsic fault on this

plane. This means that instead of the whole network being confined to one

(0001) plane each pseudo extrinsic node lie on the b plane and all the intrinsic

nodes on a planes.

EXTRINSIC INTRINSIC INTRINSIC

APP No

FAULTING FAULTING + A PB FAULTING No AP B-

FAULTI NG

1 1 7

The energies of the faults will obviously all be equal in these circumstances.

One objection could be that the "legs" not in the basal plane would be unable

to expand outwards because the ordering would prevent it. However MS pointed

41 out by Blackburn there are two types of {OlT.03 plane one of which leads

to no incorrect nearest neighbour interactions. The APB produced by an AB

dislocation on the prism planes will thus be of, low energy and Will not hamper

the dislocation movement.

Considering now to the second case, illustrated in Figure. 5.4.d. Such a

dislocation arrangement does exist in the large network, Fig 48 and appears as

the dark band of faulting labelled x-x. This occurs by the re-arrangement of

dislocations in Figure 5.4 to positions shown in Figure 5.6 This rearrangement

presumably arises due to the strong elastic forces on the nodeS at which the

six partials meet. Notice here that the extrinsic faulting, does

occur and from the nodes it can be seen that the energy appears much higher than

the intrinsic fault energy. The AB + Ccr type of fault appears also to have

a lower energy than the AT type of fault. This arrangement will occur when

the unit dislocations do not cross-slip at the nodes as described above to give

the all intrinsic fault nets.

There remains one other anomaly in the networks to be explained, and that is

the rosette pattern in Figure 4.18b. A diagram of a possible configuration of

dislocations that may give rise to such an arrangement is given in Figure 5.7

The explanation of this diagram is as follows. As can be seen again alternate

nodes lie on different basal planes . However in this case the inner partial

is not coplanar with the others in the group. (As for example at the arrowed

position). This leads to the centre of the star itself being a kind of

stacking fault, which can be represented by the sequence ababcabab. Such a

fault will not produce the typical stacking fault contrast associated with a

normal fault since there is only one layer which is the wrong position; there is

therefore no phase difference between waves diffracted from above and below the

KEY -̀ 0 THE RO:1•;711..;

II

11

A' \BA/ \ B / a \/ a

A/ -7\--E-

a B

A / \B A/ /a

C A / \B / a

\ BA/ \B cr

A / cc \ B

/

aa,

B A

s A er

X B

C C

B A

A e

C

A l

5(7)

dislocation on A

__dislocation on B

118

1 1 9

the fault plane. One can deduce its presenCe from the bowing in of the

dislocations at the centre to annihalate this fault, because this single

layer fault has two violations of the stacking sequence and consequently a

. high energy. The reason why the dislocations have behaved differently

here. is not at all obvious but faults such as this have been observed in

graphite.

5.4.1 MEASUREMENT OF STACKING FAULT ENERGY

The values of the stacking fault energies calculated in chapter four were 57

obtained using the equation due to Friedel, which has been extensively used

for measurement of stacking fault energies from extended nodes. However

there are basically three sources of error in such a determination other

than measurement errors. These are:

(i) The non-coincidence of the dislocation line and its

image

(ii) The neglect of the elastic interactions of the partials

at the node

(iii) The accuracy of the formula used for the line tension of

a curved dislocation

The first of these errors is likely to be very small in this case since the

radii of the nodes is relatively large compared with the possible image

displacement. The other two sources of error have been considered in detail 89

by Brown. He has developed equations which take into account these possible

errors and concludes that for edge nodes the value of the fault energy

calculated using Friedel's equation, is approximately correct since errors

(ii) and (iii) are opposite and cancel. This is not the case however for

screw nodes (which occur in the present networks) and multiplication by a

factor of about 2.5 is necessary in order to give a more accurate value.

In this case then the energy of the ACrAPB + SF is von 20 ergs/cm2. It

should be emphasised however that these calculations are sensitively

120

dependent both on U (which in this case has been put equal to the value for

pure titanium) and also on the value of the cut off radius chosen (in this

case equal to b). Thus the absolute accuracy of the value 29 ergs/cm2

is probably accurate to no more than + - 5 ergs/cm2. Nevertheless, the

stacking fault energy which occurs in these alloys at the c ,-0,1,* 4-Y transus is obviously very low.

The stacking fault energy obtained here is comparable to the values obtained

90 in, for example, Co-Ni alloys near the fcc 7 hcp transformation temperature .

In the present case the ordering of the, lattice will be expected to have an

effect on this value.

The simplest method of estimating the energy of a given fault is to assume

that the energy due to the error in-stacking and the energy contribution due

to the disruption of the order in the lattice are simply additive.

TOTAL )S

SF + APB

92 However it has been shown by several workers 91,

that this is not necessarily

true. For example in Ni-Mn, the fault energy is not markedly affected by the

degree of order in the lattice, whereas in Cu3Au, the fault energy actually

falls as the degree of order increases. An explanation for this effect has

been attempted in terms of the interaction between the fault and electrons

near the BrillOaM zone boundaries in the crystal but such theories are

unproven and speculative; it is obvious however that equation above is an

oversimplification of the actual fault energy.

121

CHAPTER SIX

SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER WORK

There are certain parts of the work reported here which may be

profitably continued. These may be divided into the following sections,

in roughly ascending order of importance:-

6.1 The Martensitic Transformation

6.2 The Peritectoid Reaction (m+y)#

6.3 Reversion of the Dislocation Networks

6.4 Growth of they Phase

6.1 The basic 13->o:transformation in these alloys has been shown to be

similar if not identical to the transformation in pure titanium.

However, the existence of a possible massive transformation has been

proposed to explain the existence of large block grains which have a

'different internal substructure to the more familiar massive Martensite.

This transformation could be examined in greater depth to ascertain the

effects of both cooling rate and annealing temperature on the morphology

of the room temperature« phase.

(Note: Subsequent to the completion of this work it has been shown that

little if any surface tilting is produced by the block product, which

may be considered as further evidence for the diffusional nature of the

transformation).

6.2 The present proposed peritectoid reaction (=x+y)-)-«2 seems on the

available evidence the most logical solution to the phase equilibria

existing at this point. It was pointed out that there may be a

possibility of a eutectoid reaction at this point could not be

conclusively on the evidence available. This seems a point of no more

than academic interest.

122

6.3 The networks produced by the reversion of the y phase, when reaged

at a temperature below the y transus have been found to rearrange

themselves. No detailed analysis was obtained, but it is felt that the

rearrangement would be of some interest and would be of value in

elucidating the initial precipitation mechanism of the y phase.

6.4 Finally a more exhaustive study could be made of the hcp Ofct

transformation, which the present study has shown to be of some

complexity. The features of the reaction which could be studied in

more depth are itemised and discussed below.

(I) Observation of Surface Tilts

In all the other systems quoted in the discussion in which an foot- hcp

transformation occurs, a notable feature of the transformation is a

rumpling of a previously flat surface due to the shear nature of the

change. In this specific case attempts to confirm this characteristic

have been inconclusive due to oxidation or thermal etching of the

prepared surface-.--

From the observation of surface shears is derived the proof by Kotval

and Honeycombe of both the existence of the same shear over large

atomic distances and also the growth of large plates having a total

shear of almost zero, being made up of smaller bundles having the same

vector per bundle but so arranged as to give a very small total

deformation. It has been shown that the initial small bundles of faults

are in this case characterised by the same vector and secondly that

bundles of y plates having different vectors are observed. The surface

tilt information might have a bearing on the interpretation of the

growth mechanism of the plates, normal to the basal plane.

123

(2) Growth Kinetics

It would be valuable to have more information on the growth kinetics

and nucleation rate of the y phase. The most obvious methods that may

be applied here are electrical resistivity, dilatometry, optical

microscopy and x-ray diffraction.

In the former two cases a continuous change with time must occur in the

restivity or length of specimens upon ageing and this data used to

follow the progress of the precipitation reaction. These methods would

have to be backed by optical and electron metallography since they

effectively integrate the behaviour of many y plates. Were the plates

to grow in bursts followed by periods of inactivity as in the copper-

silicon case quoted in Chapter 5, this would not necessarily be obvious

using these techniques.

X-ray diffraction could be used to follow the changes if any, in the

lattice parameters of the y phase in order to estimate the aluminium

content of the y at various stages, and also the disparity in lattice

parameters in the initial stages.

In all cases, those techniques which involve observations of the reaction

at the ageing temperature rather than by ageing and quenching are going

to be complicated by the reactivity of the alloys, and will need to be

done under a protective atmosphere of inert gas.

(3) Hot Stage Electron Microscopy

All aspects of this work could be studied using hot stage microscopy,

using a cell with a protective atmosphere. The method has been used with

considerable success by Hren and Thomas in aluminium-silver alloys. This

would be particularly useful when used with the higher penetrating power

of the million volt microscope now available. Caution would have to be

124

exercised in extrapolating this data to bulk material behaviour but

this could be correlated with simultaneous work on the bulk material.

125

CHAPTER SEVEN

CONCLUSIONS

(i) The Phase Diagram

Only the phases oz 6C2

and have been observed. The structure of m2 has been

confirmed both by electron and X-ray diffraction as DO19, and similarly the

structure of y as Llo (Cu Au I).

The results indicate that no peritectoidp +cc occurs and that there is always

a region of disordered m between the (m +cc) and the ((3 + cc ) phase fields.

The existence of the (cc2 +cc ) phase field shows that the ordering reaction hcp

to DO19

is 1st order.

The ordering temperature, Tc of the DO19

rises slowly as the aluminium content

increases until the limiting value of --40 atomic % aluminium at which point

the y phase starts to precipitate out.

A peritectoid reaction cc y -*cc is proposed, at 1210 + 5 °C.

(ii) The Martensitic Reaction p-->

There is no evidence for the retention of p at room temperature, they phase

transforming completely to the hcp phase. Despite this it has been found that

the martensite is of the 3341p type. An explanation of this, and the absence

of such typical features of titanium martensites as 165:.11 twins and a/3 <1C70.>

stacking faults, is effected in terms of the work of Hammond and Kelly.

Further the presence of apparently twin related martensite plates is explained

on the basis of the crystallography of the transformation. The random array

of a/3 <1120> dislocations found in the martensite arises from the transformation

stresses involved.

Evidence has been presented to show that thep->m transformation in titanium

aluminium alloys may occur by a massive reaction, identified by its different

morphology compared with the more familiar massive martensite.

126

(iii) Precipitation of y

They phase has been shown to precipitate out by a shear mechanism siilar

to that found in Co-Ni or Cu-Si alloys, having the orientation relationship

(0001)//1111 and < 1170>//<110>.

This occurs by the dissociation of a/3<1170> dislocations into a/3 <1010>

partials which is thought to be diffusion controlled to a certain extent.

At low temperatures extremely dense arrays of such faults are observed, but

as the temperature of the reaction is increased, this gives way to thin but

perfecty plates to thickery plates.

In the nucleation stage individual faults within thin bundles of faults have

been shown to have the same shear vector, and this together with the extreme

rapidity of the growth of y has been taken as an indication that a pole

mechanism of plate thickening is operative.

(iv) Dislocation reactions

Unique observations have been made on networks of dislocations in the DO19

superlattice. As a consequence a full discussion has been given of the

possible fault configurations which may arise with different dislocation

configurations. A simple cross-slip mechanism is proposed whereby the nets

have only intrinsic faulting at the nodes, and certain irregularities

observed are explained.

PJA/

127

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I wish to thank my Supervisor, Dr P R Swann for his patience, guidance

and interest during the course of this work. The many interesting

discussions and comments, both serious and otherwise, of my colleagues

in the Electron Microscopy Group (particularly Prandip Mukhopadhyay,

Harvey Flower and Dick Adams) have also been much appreciated.

Of the technical staff I would like to thank Bill Bishop for processing

the photographic plates, Tony Lloyd for advice and assistance, and

Miss Pam Martins for preparing the photographs in Chapter 4 of this

thesis.

I am indebted to the Science Research Council for their financial support

and Professor J G Ball for the provision of laboratory facilities.

Finally I would like to express my gratitude to my wife for her

encouragement and kindness at all times.

128

REtihRENCES

1 F A Crossley - Trans ASM 60 (4) p.714 1967

2 M J Blackburn and J C Williams - Trans AIME 239 p.287 1967

3A H Margolin - Trans AIME 242 p.742 1968

3B H Margolin and H Portisch - Trans AIME 242 p.1901 1968

4 H Ogden, D Maykruth, W Finlay and R I Jaffee - Trans AIME 191

p.1150 1951

5 P Duwez and D Taylor - Trans AIME 194 p.70 1952

6 E Bumps, H D Kessler and MHansen - Trans AIME 194 p.609 1952

7 H Ogden, D Maykruth, W Finlay and R I Jaffee - J of Met p.267 1953

8 K Sagel, E Schultz and U Zwicker Z Metallk 46 p.529 1956

9 E Anderko, K Sagel and U Zwicker - Z Metallk 48 p.57 1957

10 D Clark and J Terry - Bull Inst Metals 3 p.116 1956

11 E Ence and H Margolin - Trans AIME 209 p.484 1957

12 E Ence and H Margolin - Trans AIME 221 p.152 1961

13 J Schroeder - M S Thesis Ohio State Univ. 1958

14 A J Goldak and J Parr - Trans AIME 221 p.639 1961

15 1.1 Kornilov et al - Dokl. Akad, Nauk SSSR 131 p.837 1960

16 1.1 Kornilov Private Communication

17 T Tsujimoto and K Adachi - Trans Nat. Res. Inst. Japan 9(a) p.9 1967

18 T Tsujimoto and K Adachi - J Inst. Met 94 p.358 1966

and J Inst. Met 95 p.222 1967

19 T Sato and Y Huang - Trans. Japan Inst. Metals 1 p.22 1960

20 D Clark, K Jepson and G Lewis - J Inst. Met. 91 p.197 1962

21 F A Crossley - Trans. AIME 236 p.1174 1966

22 F A Crossley - Jnl. Inst. Met. 95 p.221 1967

23 F A Crossley - Trans AIME 242 p.726 1968

24 M J Blackburn - Trans AIME 239 p.1200 1967

25 M J Blackburn - Trans AIME 242 p.728 1968

26 M J Blackburn - Trans AIME 242 p.743 1968

1.29

27 M J Blackburn - "Science, Technology and Applications of Ti"

Pergammon 1970 p.633

28 T Tsujimoto and K Adachi J Inst. Met. 95 p.146 1967

29 M K McQuillan and A D McQuillan - "Titanium" Butterworths 1956

30 E Collinge and J C Ho - Science Technology & Applications of

Titanium Pergammon 1970 p.331

31 P C Gehlen - "Science, Technology & Applications of Titanium"

Pergammon 1970 p.349

32 P G Baggerly - Siemens Sci. Rev. XXXV 1968 p.62

33 G Lutjering and S Weissman - Acta Met 18 785 1970

34 P G Partridge - Met. Rev. 118, Metals & Materials - p.169 1967

35 M Marcinkowski - "Electron Microscopy and Strength of Crystals"

Ed: G Thomas & J Washburn, Interscience 1963

36 D Hull - "Introduction to Dislocations" Pergammon Press, 1964

37 J P Hirth and J Loethe - "Theory of Dislocations" McGraw-Hill 1968

38 S Amelinckx - Sol. State Phys. Supplement 6 Academic Press 1964

39 L K Ives and A W Ruff Jnr. - Met. Sci. Jnl: 4(ii) p.201 1970

40 E J Rapperport, C Hartley and E Levine - As reported in Prog. in

Mat. Sci. 13(i) p.29 1966

41 M J Blackburn - Trans AIME 239 p.660 1967

42 P Hirsch, A Howie, R Nicholson, D Pashley and M Whelan - "Electron

Microscopy of Thin Crystals" Butterworths London. 1965

43 W G Burgers - Physica 1 p.561 1934

44 C S Barret, A J Williams and R W Cahn - Acta. Met. 2 p.117 1954'

45 J S Bowles and J K Mackensie - Acta Met. 5 p.137 1957

46 Y C Lui and H Margolin - Trans AIME 197 p.667 1953

47 S Weinig and E S Machlin - Trans AIME 200 p.1280 1954

48 P Gaunt and J Christian - Acta Met. 7 p.534 1959

49 C Hammond and P M Kelly - Acta Met. 17 p.869 1969

50 P Duwez - Trans ASM Quart. 45 p.934 1953

130

51 D Clark, A R Brown, J A Gray and G Lewis -"Science, Technology and

Application of Titanium" Pergammon p.677 1970

52 M J Blackburn - Trans ASM Quart 59 p.876 1966

53 Z Nishiyama et all - Trans Jap Inst Met 8 p.127 1967

54 J C Williams and M J Blackburn - Trans ASM Quart 60 p.373 1967

55 H M Flower, D R West and P R Swann - To be published

56 H Ali, R Adams and P R Swann - To be published in Jnl Sci. Inst.

57 J Friedel "Les Dislocations" Gautier-Villiars Paris 1953 p.22

58 W Read - "Dislocations in Crystals" McGraw-Hill London 1953 p.131

59 P R Swann - Phil. Mag. 14 461 1966

60 A Gemperle - Phys. Stat. Sol. 19 333 1967

61 A Gemperle and J Kocik - Phys. Stat. Sol. 30 541 1968

62 N Stoloff and S Davies - Trans AIME 230 390 1964

63 M Hansen - "Constitution of Binary Alloys" McGraw-Hill London 1958

64 R P Elliot - "1st Supplement - Constitution of Binary Alloys" McGraw-Hill London 1965

65 T Muto and Y Takagi - Sol. Stat. Phys. 1 193 1955

66 M K and A D McQuillan "Titanium" Butterworths Press London 1958

67 H W King - "Physical Metallurgy" Ed. R W Cahn, North Holland, Amsterdam 1965

68 J C Williams, R Taggart and D H Polonis - Met. Trans 1 2265 1970

69 H M Flower - Unpublished work

70 T B Massalski - "Phase Transformations"1. Chapman and Hall (for ASM) London 1970

71 H M Flower and P R Swann - "2nd International Conference on Titanium" to be published by Metalurgical Society of AIME

72A E Votova - Acta Met. 8 901 1960

72B E Votova - J.Inst. Met. 90 129 1961-62

73 H Bibring, F Sebilleau and C Buckle - J. Inst. Met. 87 71 1958

74 E de Lamotte and C Alstetter - Trans AIME 245 651 1969

75 P S Kotval and R W K Honeycombe - Acta Met. 16 596 1968

131

76 J A Hren and G Thomas - Trans AIME 227 308 1963

77 K Kinsman et al - Met. Trans 2 1041 1971

78 J K Tien et al - Met Trans 2 1193 1971

79 H Suzuki and C S Barrett - Acta Met. 6 156 1958

80 C S Smith - Trans ASM 45 533 1953

81 Z S Basinski and J W Christian - Phil. Mag. /1/i 791 1953

82 A Seeger - Z fur Metallk 44 247 1953

83 A Seeger - Z fur Metallk 47 653 1956

84 H I Aaronson - "Decomposition of Austenite by Diffusional Processes" John Wiley, New York 1962 p.387

85 J W Christian and P R Swann - "Alloying Behaviour and Effects in Solid Solutions" Ed. T B Massalski, Gordon and Breach, New York 1965 p.105

86 A Berghezan et al - Acta Met. 9 464 1961

87 N Thompson - Proc. ,Roy. Soc. Series A 66 481 1959

88 S.Amelinckx and P Delavignette Jnl. Nucl. Mat. 5(1) 17 1962

89 L M Brown - Phil. Mag. 10 441 1964

90 A Howie and P R Swann - Phil. Mag. 6 1215 1961

91 J C Slater - Phys. Rev. 84(2) 179 1951

92 D E Mikkola and J B Cohen - Jnl. Appl. Phys. 33(3) 892 1961