Elements/Media

Types Comparison Which one do I use? Construction Testing

Types

Cellulose Fiberglass Wire Mesh Water Removal

Cellulose

Denoted by a “C” - (10C) Phenolic resins hold pleat shape after

curing Not recommended for HWCF Difficult to achieve < 5 micron removal

due to large fiber size Old technology, commodity type of

element

Wire Mesh

Stainless steel Cleanable media with some % loss of

life Difficult to clean elements rated below

40 micron Rated as mesh size or micron size

pore200 mesh = 74W (74 micron)

Element Cleaning

1)Remove external build-up with cleaning fluid in separate tank

2)Immerse element for 30 minutes in cleaning fluid

3)Flush opposite direction as oil flow with water & air

Element Cleaning

4)Continue to flush with air only

5)Immerse in ISO-Propyl -Alcohol to remove remaining water particle

6)Air dry element and package for future use

Fiberglass

Latest technology for solid particle removal

Microglass III is our current version Denoted by a “Q” - (10Q)

MicroGlass III

Dual Layer constructionUpstream Support Mesh

Micro-glass Capacity Layer

Micro-glass Efficiency Layer

Polyester Spun-bonded Support Layer

Downstream Support Mesh

Support Core

MicroGlass III

Dual Layer construction

Capacity Layer High Loft

– Void Volume– Protects

Efficiency Layer

Typical capacity layer (100x)

MicroGlass III

Dual Layer constructionMembrane Efficiency

Layer Ultrathin .007”

– Increased Filtration Area

Laminated to Support Scrim

– Fixed Pore Size Typical efficiency layer (100x)

MicroGlass III vs. II

Equivalent Efficiency Equal or Greater Dirt Holding Capacity Much Lower Clean Pressure Drop

Lower Energy ConsumptionLower stress on filter constructionLess chance of bypass in cold conditionsOpportunity to upgrade to higher efficiency

MicroGlass III vs. IITested Per ISO 16889 to 4 bar (60 PSID) 114LPM (30 GPM) 10mg/L BUGL

Dirt Holding capacity

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

CAPACITY (GRAMS)

MicroGlass III

PARKER HF3 3 micron ELEMENT PERFORMANCE

MicroGlass III

MicroGlass II

MicroGlass III vs. II Tested Per ISO 3968

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

FLOW RATE (GPM)

PR

ES

SU

RE

DR

OP

(P

SID

)

ELEMENT ONLY 130 cSt

MicroGlass IIIPARKER HF3 3 micron ELEMENT PERFORMANCE

MicroGlass IIIMicroGlass II

Flow vs. Pressure Drop

MicroGlass III vs. II Tested Per ISO 16889 to 4 bar (60 PSID) 114LPM (30 GPM) 10mg/L BUGL

Dirt Holding Capacity

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70

CAPACITY (GRAMS)

PARKER HF3 5 micron ELEMENT PERFORMANCE

MicroGlass III

MicroGlass II

MicroGlass III

MicroGlass III vs. II Tested Per ISO 3968

PARKER HF3 5 micron ELEMENT PERFORMANCE

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

FLOW RATE (GPM)

PR

ES

SU

RE

DR

OP

(P

SID

)

ELEMENT ONLY 130 cSt

MicroGlass III

Flow vs. Pressure Drop

MicroGlass III

MicroGlass II

MicroGlass III vs. IITested Per ISO 16889 to 4 bar (60 PSID) 114LPM (30 GPM) 10mg/L BUGL

Dirt Holding Capacity

0

20

40

60

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60

CAPACITY (GRAMS)

PARKER HF3 10 micron ELEMENT PERFORMANCE

MicroGlass III

MicroGlass II

MicroGlass III

MicroGlass III vs. II Tested Per ISO 3968

PARKER HF3 10 micron ELEMENT PERFORMANCE

0

5

10

15

20

25

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

FLOW RATE (GPM)

PR

ES

SU

RE

DR

OP

(P

SID

)

ELEMENT ONLY 130 cSt

MicroGlass III

MicroGlass II

MicroGlass III

Flow vs. Pressure Drop

MicroGlass III vs. Competition Tested Per ISO 16889 to 6.8 bar(100 PSID)

114LPM (30 GPM) 10mg/L BUGL January 8, 2001

Capacity - Retained4 µ (c)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Donaldson

Pall

Vickers

PARKER

PTI

Hycon

Schroeder

Fairey Arlon

Co

mp

eti

tor

Grams

Capacity - Retained10 µ (c)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Donaldson

Pall

Vickers

PARKER

PTI

Hycon

Schroeder

Fairey Arlon

Co

mp

eti

tor

Grams

MicroGlass III vs. Competition Tested Per ISO 16889 to 100 psid

114LPM (30 GPM) 10mg/L BUGL January 8, 2001

Efficiency Rating4µ (c)

98.2

98.7

99.1

99.2

99.6

97.3

99.6

97.3

96 97 98 99 100

Donaldson

Pall

Vickers

PARKER

PTI

Hycon

Schroeder

Fairey Arlon

Co

mp

eti

tor

Efficiency %

ß = 75 ß = 200

Efficiency Rating10µ (c)

99.4

98.8

99

99.6

99.8

99.6

99.6

99.7

96 97 98 99 100

Donaldson

Pall

Vickers

PARKER

PTI

Hycon

Schroeder

Fairey Arlon

Co

mp

eti

tor

Efficiency %

ß = 75 ß = 200

MicroGlass III vs. Competition Tested Per ISO 3968 January 8, 2001

Pressure Drop @ 50 GPM (130 cSt)4µ (c)

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

Donaldson

Pall

Vickers

PARKER

PTI

Hycon

Schroeder

Fairey Arlon

Co

mp

eti

tor

Pressure Drop (psi)

Pressure Drop @ 50 GPM (130 cSt)10µ (c)

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

Donaldson

Pall

Vickers

PARKER

PTI

Hycon

Schroeder

Fairey Arlon

Co

mp

eti

tor

Pressure Drop (psi)

Comparison

Comparison

Ecoglass II Line of non-metallic filter

elements meeting ecological demands for longer life and reduced disposal.

Up to 60% less disposal volume.

Par-Fit designs that do not require customer retrofit, or relocation of bypass valves which compromises performance.

Par-Gel

Small amounts of water

Removes free water only

Low flow density

Par-Gel

New pleat before absorption

Used pleat swelled from water retention

Par-Fit

Must compare efficiency, dirt capacity, and pressure loss at the same micron size

Price-Per-Gram

Element A

Price: $20.00

Dirt capacity: 5 grams

Price-per-gram: $4.00

Element B

$30.00

10 grams

$3.00

Multi-pass Test

To compare testsFlow RateTerminal Pressure Injection rateConcentrationElement sizeContaminant type