26
How useful are fraction bars for understanding fraction equivalence and addition? A difficulty factors assessment with 5 th , 6 th , and 7 th graders Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R. Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute Carnegie Mellon University [email protected]

Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R. Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

  • Upload
    edward

  • View
    49

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

How useful are fraction bars for understanding fraction equivalence and addition? A difficulty factors assessment with 5 th , 6 th , and 7 th graders. Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R. Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute Carnegie Mellon University [email protected]. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

How useful are fraction bars for understanding fraction equivalence

and addition?

A difficulty factors assessment with 5th, 6th, and 7th graders

Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R. KoedingerHuman-Computer Interaction Institute

Carnegie Mellon [email protected]

Page 2: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

2

Sam spent 5/7 of his money on a board game. The game cost $25. How much money did he have at first?

aid sense-making and become a bridge to abstract thinking

NCTM 2013 Leinwand & Ginsburg 2007

$25

?

harm performance if students can’t interpret them correctly

Diagrams can …

Rittle-Johnson & Koedinger2001Booth & Koedinger 2011

Page 3: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

3

Page 4: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

4

Page 5: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

5

Page 6: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

6

Page 7: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

7

I’m Done!!

1-2 timesper student per problemStampfer & Koedinger 2013

Page 8: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

8

How does fraction bar utility develop between 5th and 7th grade?

Page 9: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

9

What Makes This So Hard?1) Areas represent

amounts

2) Bars represent fractions

3) Mapping the relationship between the pictures to the relationship between the fractions

Page 10: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

10

Difficulty Factor Assessment• Paper & pencil quiz

• One question format per skill

• Tasks: addition and equivalence

• Within-subject design

• 5th – 7th graders at local public school (~150 students in each grade)

Page 11: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

11

is bigger than

is smaller than

is equivalent to

a)

b)

c)

Page 12: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

12

is bigger than

is smaller than

is equivalent to

a)

b)

c)

721

13

13

13

13

721

721

721

Pictures Only

1) Areas represent

amounts

Pictures &

Numbers2) Bars represent

fractions

Half Pictures &

Numbers3) Mapping

relationshipsNumbers OnlyControl

82% 88% 90%81% 86% 93%

5th 6th 7th

82% 86% 90%50%

67%

1

0

57%

Page 13: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

13

Hint:

True or false:

+ =FALSE

Page 14: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

14

Hint:

True or false:

Pictures Only

1) Areas represent

amounts

313

211

12+

211

12

313

Pictures &

Numbers2) Bars represent

fractions

+ =

Half Pictures

& Numbers3) Mapping

relationshipsNumbers Only

Control 5th 6th 7th

82% 87%79% 75% 84%64%46% 70% 77%52% 64%

1

0

21%

Page 15: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

15

Percent Correct by Grade & ScaffoldStudents did 2 problems of each type~150 students in each grade

5th 6th 7th

Pictures

Pictures & Numbers

Half Pictures & Numbers

Numbers 5th 6th 7th 5th 6th 7th

Equivalence Addition

Page 16: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

16

Repeated Measures ANOVAs by Grade

Pictures

Pictures & Numbers

Half Pictures & Numbers

Numbers 5th 6th 7th 5th 6th 7th

Equivalence Addition

Class Tracking Level x Scaffold x Task (repeated measures on scaffold and task)

Main Effects: Scaffold and Task (p<.01)Interactions: 5th grade Scaffold * Task (p<.01)

Page 17: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

17

Repeated Measures for EquivalenceGrade x Scaffold, repeated measures on scaffold

Pictures

Pictures & Numbers

Half Pictures & Numbers

Numbers 5th 6th 7th

Main Effects: Scaffold and Grade (both p<.01)

No Scaffold * Grade Interaction

Difficulty depends presence of picturesStudents improve from 5th to 7th grade

Page 18: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

18

Repeated Measures for AdditionGrade x Scaffold, repeated measures on scaffold

Pictures

Pictures & Numbers

Half Pictures & Numbers

Numbers 5th 6th 7th

Main Effects: Scaffold and Grade (both p<.01)

Scaffold * Grade Interaction (p<.01)

Difficulty depends on scaffoldRelative difficulty of scaffolds depends on gradePerformance improves with grade

Page 19: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

19

Separate ANOVAs on Scaffold by Gradewith Post-Hoc Tukey tests

Pictures

Pictures & Numbers

Half Pictures & Numbers

Numbers 5th 6th 7th

5th Grade: All differences (p<.01)

6th and 7th Grade:Numbers (p<.01)

For 5th graders, each scaffold type had a unique difficulty levelFor 6th and 7th graders, Numbers was more difficult than the others

Page 20: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

20

• One school

• False addition questions all used same foil (adding numerators and denominators)

• Does not untangle diagram interpretation from skills with fractions – both improve with grade

Limitations: Population & Design

Page 21: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

21

Fraction Bar Utility Depends on Task and Develops Through Middle School

• Equivalence: within each grade, performance is equally high with diagrams and lower without them

• Addition: 5th graders have different levels of difficulty with each scaffold.

• With 6th and 7th graders, differences among the scaffolds with pictures decrease, but do not disappear

Page 22: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

22

Diagram interpretation skills are sensitive to context, even when the domains are closely related and the diagrams being used are similar.

Equivalence Addition

Page 23: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

23

This Work Was Supported By:

A Graduate Training Grant awarded to Carnegie Mellon University by the Department of Education (R305B090023)

The Pittsburgh Science of Learning Center through NSF award SBE-0836012

Page 24: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

Thank you! How useful are fraction bars for

understanding fraction equivalence and addition?

Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Ken KoedingerCarnegie Mellon University

[email protected]

Page 25: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

25

+14

Hint:25

1320

The top shaded parts are the same

as the bottom

True or false:

+14

25

1320=

The amounts are the same, but is

that what the question is asking?

Confusion Because…Lack of Domain Knowledge?

Page 26: Eliane Stampfer Wiese, Kenneth R.  Koedinger Human-Computer Interaction Institute

26

Is it a Perceptual Problem?

• Calculated disparities for each item•ANOVAs showed no main effect of disparity, and no interaction between disparity and scaffold type