35
Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin http://www.ece.utexas.edu/~bevans

Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin

Prof. Brian L. EvansDept. of Electrical and Computer

Eng.The University of Texas at Austin

http://www.ece.utexas.edu/~bevans

Page 2: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

2

Got to Texas as Fast I Could…

BSEE/CS Rose-Hulman 1987 MSEE Georgia Tech 1988 PhDEE Georgia Tech 1993 Post-Doc UC Berkeley 1993-1996 Very happy to land in Austin in Fall 1996

at …

Page 3: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

3

Summary of Previous NI Interaction

NI Support Prior to Fall 2002 Funding for Babar Ahmed (undergraduate)

Real-Time DSP Lab alumni who went to NI Prethi Gopinath, Newton Petersen, Junichi

Suguira NI employees in Embedded Software

Systems Hugo Andrade, Scott Kovner, Sadia Malik,

Kurt Nee, Newton Petersen, Ram Rajagopal,Michael Schaeffer

Page 4: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

4

Outline

Real-Time Digital Signal Processing Lab Programmable Digital Signal Processors Future Uses of LabVIEW

Embedded Software Systems graduate course Electronic Design Automation Tools Interaction with National Instruments

Research Group (Embedded Signal Proc. Lab) Common Themes ADSL Transceiver Design

Page 5: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

5

Real-Time DSP Lab

Introduced Fall 1997: 384 served Digital signal processing theory/algorithms Digital communication systems Digital signal processor architecture Deliverable: Voiceband modem

Design of sinusoidal generators, filters, etc. Implementation in C/assembly on TI floating-

point TMS320C6700 DSP using Code Composer Studio

Test implementation with spectrum analyzers, etc.

Page 6: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

6

Digital Signal Processors (DSPs)

For real time (guaranteed delivery) Fixed-point DSPs for high-volume products

Battery-powered: cell phones, dial-up modems, portable MP3 players, digital still cameras, and digital video (e.g. TI C5000)

Wall-powered: ADSL modems, VDSL modems, cell phone basestations, modem banks, laser printers, video conferencing systems (e.g. TI 6200, C6400)

Floating-point DSPs for low-volume products and feasibility analysis on fixed-point DSPs

TI 45%, Agere 25%, Mot 10%, 8% Analog

Page 7: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

7

Digital Signal Processor Architecture

Harvard architecture: program/data memory separated and can be accessed on same cycle

Word size: 16, 20, 24, or 32 bits Programmer must manage memory

32-128 kwords data/program on chip On-chip data cache rare (TI C6000) No support for virtual memory

Predictable input/output: deterministic interrupt service routine latency (e.g. 11 cycles on TI C6000)

Page 8: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

8

Digital Signal Processor Architecture

Deterministic, no-overhead looping Single instruction cycle multiply unit(s) No-overhead addressing modes in hardware

Modulo addressing for circular buffers, e.g. filters Bit-reversed addressing, e.g. fast Fourier

transforms (not available on TI C6000) Native number formats

Integer: binary point on far right of bit pattern Fractional: binary point just right of sign bit Floating-point: could emulate on fixed-point DSPs

Page 9: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

9

Drawbacks to Programming DSPs

General drawbacks Limited on-chip memory Poor C compiler performance

Fixed-point issues Non-standard C extensions for fractional data Converting floating-point programs to fixed-

point Manual tracking of binary point prone to error

Conventional DSPs No byte addressing (needed for image/video) Limited addressable memory on fixed-point

DSPs

Page 10: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

10

LabVIEW for Real-Time DSP Lab

Students use LabVIEW in a pre-requisite Fall 2003: System-level representation

In the first lab, students are given a LabVIEW simulation of voiceband modem running on PC

In each subsequent lab, students substitute the subsystem implemented on the DSP in the LabVIEW simulation to test the design

Future: Synthesis vs. handcoding In each lab, students use the LabVIEW modem

simulation to synthesize the subsystem being designed and compare their handcode with it

Page 11: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

11

Embedded Software Systems

Introduced in Spring 1997: 87 served Modern methods for specifying, simulating,

and synthesizing embedded systemsProgramming languages ConcurrencyDataflow models Process networkScheduling Software synthesisDiscrete-event models Cosimulation

Students evaluate/build system designs in Ptolemy from UC Berkeley Advanced Design System from Agilent

Page 12: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

12

Dataflow Models

Examples in modern design automation tools

EDA Tool Dataflow Models Example Application

Agilent Advanced Design System

Synchronous Dataflow,Timed Synchronous

Dataflow

Mixed analog, digital, and RF communication systems

(data transmission subsystem)

Co-Centric System Design Studio

Cyclostatic Dataflow Periodic digital systems, e.g. data converters, MP3 decoder, digital

baseband communications

Cadence Signal Processing Worksystem

Synchronous Dataflow, Dynamic Dataflow

Periodic digital systems

UC Berkeley Ptolemy Synchronous Dataflow,Boolean Dataflow,Dynamic Dataflow

Periodic and aperiodic digital systems

Page 13: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

13

Synchronous Dataflow [Lee 1986]

Arcs: one-way first-in first-out queues A block is enabled for execution when enough

tokens are available on all inputs Source blocks are always enabled

When block executes, it always produces and consumes the same fixed amount of tokens

Consumed data is dequeued from arc Flow of data through graph may not depend on

values of data Delay is a property of an arc

Delay of n samples means that n tokens are initially in the queue of that arc

Page 14: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

14

Synchronous Dataflow

Systems are determinate History of tokens produced on communication

channels do not depend on the execution order May be executed sequentially or in parallel with

the same outcome Scheduling

Load balancing to make sure that all tokens produced can be consumed: linear complexity

Find a periodic schedule List scheduling: worst-case is exponential complexity Heuristics to minimize buffer size: cubic complexity

Page 15: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

15

Synchronous Datalflow Modeling Signal Processing

Finite impulse response filters Infinite impulse response filters Fast Fourier transform Multirate systems and filter banks

Communication Systems Sinusoidal modulation and demodulation Pulse shapers Transmission subsystem

Inappropriate for data-dependent graphs, e.g. baud rate negotiation at modem startup

Page 16: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

16

Process Network [Kahn 1974]

A set of concurrent processes that communicate through network of one-way infinite first-in first-out (FIFO) queues

Reads from queues are blocking If the queue is empty, the process will

suspend until there is enough data in the queue.

When a process blocks, the scheduler will not run the process until enough data becomes available.

Writes to the queues are non-blocking

Page 17: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

17

Process Network A process is either enabled or blocked

waiting for data on only one of its input channels

Systems are determinate History of tokens produced on communication

channels do not depend on the execution order

May be executed sequentially or in parallel with the same outcome

Supports recurrence and recursion Formal mathematical representation:

processes are functions that map streams into streams

Page 18: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

18

Process Network Turing complete: questions of termination

and bounded buffering are undecidable Undecidable (in finite time) if process

network Terminates Requires bounded memory

Signal processing: run for infinite time Scheduler can find a bounded memory

solution using infinite time [Parks 1995] Ptolemy Process Network domain UT Austin Computational Process Network

framework in C++http://www.ece.utexas.edu/~allen/PNSourceCode/

Page 19: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

19

NIers in Embedded Software Systems

Hugo Andrade and Scott Kovner, 1998,“Software Synthesis from Dataflow Models for

Embedded Software Design in the G Programming Language and the LabVIEW Development Environment”

Kurt Nee (with Chad Roesle), 1999,“Feasability of Implementating an H.263+

Decoder on a TMS320C6x Digital Signal Processor”

Page 20: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

20

NIers in Embedded Software Systems

Michael Schaeffer, 1999,“An Extension to the Foundation Fieldbus

Model for Specifying Process Control Strategies”

Sadia Malik and Ram Rajagopal, 2000,“LabVIEW Based Embedded Design”

Newton Petersen (with Martin Wojcik), 2000,“Node Prefetch Prediction in Dataflow Graphs”

Page 21: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

21

Image Analysis

Ph.D. graduates: Dong Wei (SBC Research) K. Clint Slatton (UT Center for Space Research) Wade C. Schwartzkopf

Real-Time Imaging Ph.D. graduates: Thomas D. Kite (Audio Precision) Niranjan Damera-Venkata (HP Labs)Ph.D. students: Gregory E. Allen (UT Applied Research Labs) Serene BanerjeeMS graduates: Young Cho (UCLA)MS students: Vishal Monga

Ph.D. graduates: Güner Arslan (Cicada) Biao Lu (Schlumberger)Ph.D. students: Dogu Arifler Ming Ding Milos Milosevic (Schlumberger)

ADSL/VDSL Transceiver Design

Wireless Communications

Ph.D. graduates: Murat Torlak (UT Dallas)Ph.D. student: Kyungtae Han MS graduates: Srikanth K. Gummadi (TI) Amey A. Deosthali (TI)MS students: Zukang Shen Ian Wong

http://signal.ece.utexas.edu

Wireless Networking and Comm. Group: http://www.wncg.org

Center for Perceptual Systems: http://www.cps.utexas.edu

Prof. Brian L. Evans

Page 22: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

22

Common Themes Find or derive optimal algorithm Develop low-complexity algorithms

(bottom-up design) Keep in mind that these algorithms will

ultimately be realized in real time on a fixed-point DSP

Algorithms should be statically scheduled Evaluate performance-implementation tradeoff

System-level design (top-down design) Dataflow modeling for synthesis Simulate system to validate algorithm

Software releases

Page 23: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

23

ADSL Transceiver Design

Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line modem Line driver (single chip) Transceiver: analog front end + digital baseband

Sampling rate: 2.208 Mbps (real time) Bit error rate: 10-7 (Reed-Solomon codes) Symbol rate: 4,000 symbols/s Frame is symbol plus redundant information Single frame transmission (low delay) Proper equalizer design can double bit rate

Page 24: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

24

Digital Subscriber Line (DSL)Broadband Access

Customer Premises

downstream

upstream

Voice

Switch

Central Office

DSLAM

DSL modem

DSL modem

LPFLPF

Telephone Network

Internet

DSLAM - DSL Access Multiplexer

LPF – Low Pass Filter

Page 25: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

25

Discrete Multitone (DMT) Standards ADSL – Asymmetric DSL (G.DMT Standard)

Echo cancelled no longer deployed in central office

Frequency division multiplexing max. data rates:13.38 Mbps downstream, 1.56 Mbps upstream

ADSL:cable modem –1:2 in US & 5:1 non-US

DMT VDSL – Very HighRate DSL (Proposed) Faster G.DMT ADSL Freq. division multiplex 2m subcarriers m [8, 12]

G.DMT ADSL

Asymmetric DMT VDSL

Data band 25 kHz – 1.1 MHz

1 MHz – 12 MHz

Upstream subcarriers

32 256

Downstream subcarriers

256 2048/4096

Target up- stream rate

1 Mbps 3 Mbps

Target down- stream rate

8 Mbps 13/22 Mbps

Page 26: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

26

Multicarrier Modulation

Divide channel into narrowband subchannels No inter-symbol interference

(ISI) if constant gain in everysubchannel and ideal sampling

Discrete multitone modulation Based on fast Fourier transform (FFT)

subchannel

frequency

magnitude

carrier

DTFT-1pulse sinc

kcc

k

kc

sin

channel

Subchannels are 4.3 kHz wide in ADSL and DMT VDSL

Page 27: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

27

Discrete Multitone Modulation Symbol

Subsymbols are complex-valued ADSL training uses 4-level Quadrature

Amplitude Modulation (QAM) ADSL uses QAM of 22, 23, 24, …, 215

levels during data transmission

In-phase

Quadrature

iX

QAM

N-pointInverse

FFT

X1

X2

X1*

x1

x2

x3

xNX2*

XN/2

XN/2-1*

X0

one symbol of N

real-valued samples

N/2 subsymbols(one subsymbol

per carrier)

Page 28: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

28

Discrete Multitone Modulation Frame Frame through D/A converter and

transmitted Frame is the symbol with cyclic prefix prepended Cyclic prefix (CP) is last samples of symbol

Linear convolution of framew/ channel impulse response Is circular convolution if channel

length is CP length plus one or shorter If circular, frequency equalization in FFT domain

N samplesv samples

CP CPs y m b o l i s y m b o l i+1

copy copy

ADSL G.DMT Values Down

stream Up

stream 32 4

N 512 64

Page 29: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

29

Eliminating Inter-Symbol Interference Time domain equalizer (TEQ)

Finite impulse response (FIR) filter Effective channel impulse response:

convolution of TEQ impulse responsewith channel impulse response

Frequency domain equalizer (FEQ) Compensates magnitude and phase

distortion of channel + TEQ by dividingeach FFT coefficient by complex number

ADSL G.DMT equalizer training Reverb: same symbol sent 1,024 to 1,536 times Medley: aperiodic sequence of 16,384 symbols At 0.25 s after medley, receiver returns number

of bits on each subcarrier that can be supported

channel impulse response

effective channel impulse response

: transmission delay: cyclic prefix length

Page 30: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

30

P/S

QAM demod

decoder

invert channel

=frequency

domainequalizer

S/P

quadrature amplitude

modulation (QAM) encoder

mirrordataand

N-IFFT

add cyclic prefix

P/SD/A +

transmit filter

N-FFTand

removemirrored

data

S/Premove

cyclic prefix

TRANSMITTER

RECEIVER

N/2 subchannels N real samples

N real samplesN/2 subchannels

time domain

equalizer (FIR filter)

receive filter

+A/D

channel

ADSL Transceiver: Data Transmission

Bits

00110

conventional ADSL equalizer structure

Page 31: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

31

Simulation Results for 17-Tap TEQ

Achievable percentage of upper bound on bit rate

ADSL CSA Loop

Minimum

MSE

Maximum Geometric

SNR

Maximum Shortening

SNR

Minimum

ISI

Maximum

Bit Rate

Upper Bound

(Mbps) 1 43% 84% 62% 99% 99% 9.059

2 70% 73% 75% 98% 99% 10.344

3 64% 94% 82% 99% 99% 8.698

4 70% 68% 61% 98% 99% 8.695

5 61% 84% 72% 98% 99% 9.184

6 62% 93% 80% 99% 99% 8.407

7 57% 78% 74% 99% 99% 8.362

8 66% 90% 71% 99% 100% 7.394

Cyclic prefix length 32FFT size (N) 512Coding gain 4.2 dBMargin 6 dB

Input power 23 dBmNoise power -140 dBm/HzCrosstalk noise 8 ADSL disturbersPOTS splitter 5th order Chebyshev

Page 32: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

32

Simulation Results for 3-Tap TEQ Achievable percentage of matched filter bound on bit rate

ADSL CSA Loop

Minimum

MSE

Maximum Geometric

SNR

Maximum Shortening

SNR

Minimum

ISI

Maximum

Bit Rate

Upper Bound

(Mbps) 1 54% 70% 96% 97% 98% 9.059

2 47% 71% 96% 96% 97% 10.344

3 57% 69% 92% 98% 99% 8.698

4 46% 66% 97% 97% 98% 8.695

5 52% 65% 96% 97% 98% 9.184

6 60% 71% 95% 98% 99% 8.407

7 46% 63% 93% 96% 97% 8.362

8 55% 61% 94% 98% 99% 7.394

Cyclic prefix length 32FFT size (N) 512Coding gain 4.2 dBMargin 6 dB

Input power 23 dBmNoise power -140 dBm/HzCrosstalk noise 8 ADSL disturbersPOTS splitter 5th order Chebyshev

Page 33: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

33

Contributions by Research Group New time-domain equalizer design

methods Maximum Bit Rate method maximizes bit rate

(upper bound) Minimum Inter-Symbol Interference method

(real-time, fixed-point) Minimum Inter-Symbol Interference TEQ

design method Reduces number of TEQ taps by a factor of ten

over Minimum Mean Squared Error method for the same bit rate in discretized simulation

Implemented in real-time on Motorola 56000, TI TMS320C6200 and TI TMS320C5000 DSPs:http://www.ece.utexas.edu/~bevans/projects/adsl

Page 34: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

34

Matlab DMT TEQ Design Toolbox 3.1

FIR, dual-path, per-tone & filter bank equalizers: http://www.ece.utexas.edu/~bevans/projects/adsl/dmtteq/

variousperformance

measures

default parameters

from G.DMT ADSL

standard

different graphical

views

-140

23

Page 35: Embedded Signal Processing Laboratory at UT Austin Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Eng. The University of Texas at Austin bevans

35

Future Interaction with NI

Integrate LabVIEW into Real-Time DSP Lab to reinforce modem system being designed

Add lecture on LabVIEW computational model in Embedded Software Systems course

Discuss ideas for extensions to LabVIEW for synthesis onto programmable DSPs Evaluate restrictions and extensions to the G

language for synthesis Investigate methods for conversion of floating-

point source code to fixed-point