20
Follow @CIBSE Embodied Carbon and Building Services Dr Julie Godefroy, Technical Manager 23 rd July 2020

Embodied Carbon and Building Services · 2020. 7. 28. · MEP vs Total initial embodied carbon LETI, from Cradle to Gate CIBSE TM56 Fig u re 8.1 - Big tic ke t ite m s stud y fo r

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Embodied Carbon and Building Services · 2020. 7. 28. · MEP vs Total initial embodied carbon LETI, from Cradle to Gate CIBSE TM56 Fig u re 8.1 - Big tic ke t ite m s stud y fo r

Follow @CIBSE

Embodied Carbon and Building Services

Dr Julie Godefroy, Technical Manager

23rd July 2020

Page 2: Embodied Carbon and Building Services · 2020. 7. 28. · MEP vs Total initial embodied carbon LETI, from Cradle to Gate CIBSE TM56 Fig u re 8.1 - Big tic ke t ite m s stud y fo r

CIBSE Climate Action Plan

https://www.cibse.org/news-and-policy/july-2019/cibse-climate-action-plan-building-services-engi

POLICY FRAMEWORK

https://www.cibse.org/news-and-policy/policy

Regular engagement with policy consultations

including Building Regulations, retrofit, energy

efficiency, low-carbon heat, climate adaptation

Position statements e.g. Building Regulations

Part L, overheating

Members of Part L, Part F and overheating

working groups for the 2019 Building

Regulations review

Collaboration with other institutions to align our

policy recommendations where possible e.g.

Green Building Council, LETI

Update our policy statements on zero carbon

buildings, climate change mitigation and

adaptation

Seek more opportunities to collaborate with

others to send consistent policy messages e.g.

with RTPI on planning & climate change,

RAEng on data sharing and disclosure, RICS on

valuing sustainability and encouraging more

focus on operational outcomes in asset valuation

COMPETENCE AND TRAINING

Regular training and CPDs covering climate

change, low-carbon buildings, and building

performance

Low-carbon consultant and Low Carbon Energy

Assessor certification schemes

Joint training with Green Register on

collaborative design and overheating risk

Review training programme in line with new

technical guidance

Explore further opportunities for multi-

disciplinary training with other organisations

e.g. retrofit, professional ethics

⁇ Introduce mandatory CPDs on climate change

and zero-carbon buildings

EVENTS, DISSEMINATION AND AWARDS

Regular reporting on low-carbon buildings in

CIBSE Journal, blog, newsletter and on website

Regular CIBSE events on low-carbon buildings

Since 2012, requirement for in-use performance

data for the CIBSE awards

Initial steps with RIBA to better align the

sustainability criteria in our awards

Increase our coverage of retrofit design & skills

Seek opportunities to further encourage and

reward the monitoring, disclosure and sharing of

building performance data e.g. through our

awards or energy benchmarks platform

Seek more alignment with other institutions on

sustainability awards e.g. with RIBA on

operational performance, with IStructE and ICE

on embodied impacts

RESEARCH

https://www.cibse.org/knowledge/research

Research on low-carbon buildings, climate

change adaptation, and future weather files

Updated energy benchmarks and benchmarking

tool to encourage continuous improvement

Continuous review of research areas to align with

needs for future guidance, in collaboration with

other research organisations e.g. retrofit, circular

economy, fuel cells, hydrogen boilers, energy

benchmarks for low carbon buildings

⁇ BSERT Special Issues e.g. zero carbon, retrofit

TECHNICAL GUIDANCE

Extensive guidance on low-energy and low-

carbon buildings; upcoming publications include

the revised Code of Practice for heat networks

(CP1) and revised Guide L- Sustainability, 2019

Coverage of climate change adaptation in

existing guidance and weather files

Collaboration with RIBA: input to upcoming

RIBA sustainability outcomes

Collaboration with others on guidance e.g. BSI

on standards for retrofit and building

performance evaluation

Keep our guidance under review, and seek to

ensure it represents best practice on low and zero

carbon built environments; members are invited

to let us know where they think guidance should

be updated

Work with others to harmonise our

recommended building performance outcomes

Extend our guidance in low-carbon buildings,

with priority themes including:

Defining and achieving low embodied and

whole life carbon, in collaboration with

others including UK-GBC, RICS, IStructE

Building simulation

Hot water temperatures for low-carbon heat

Heat pumps

Heat networks: low-temperature, ambient

loops, and low-carbon network retrofits

Demand management

Reducing plant requirements for demand

management and lower embodied carbon

Retrofit – in collaboration with others

Collaborate with others for guidance on trees and

green infrastructure, and how they can contribute

to climate mitigation, adaptation and wider

sustainability outcomes e.g. with the Trees and

Design Action Group and Landscape Institute

⁇ Produce a Code of Practice for zero carbon

buildings

Action on embodied

carbon in all these

streams:

➢ Events

➢ Training

➢ Policy

➢ Research

➢ Guidance

+ Possibly in future:

➢ Awards

Page 3: Embodied Carbon and Building Services · 2020. 7. 28. · MEP vs Total initial embodied carbon LETI, from Cradle to Gate CIBSE TM56 Fig u re 8.1 - Big tic ke t ite m s stud y fo r

MEP vs Total initial embodied carbon

LETI, from Cradle to Gate CIBSE TM56

Figure 8.1 - Big ticket items study for a typical mixed use development: commercial & residential.Study by Mirko Farnetani

Figure 8.2 - Embodied carbon break-down per element (Cradle to Gate)

Proportions of embodied carbon by building element

The diagram below shows the relative proportions of

embodied carbon by building element and illustrates

the elements where the most savings may be made.

What is important is not just the proportion of

embodied carbon per element, but the potential

total embodied carbon reductions of all the elements.

At RIBA Stage 3 a full building detailed whole life

carbon assessment should be undertaken. As part of

this a study should be undertaken that identifies the

breakdown of embodied carbon by element and

the carbon reductions that could be achieved for

each element. This helps to identify ‘big ticket items’ –

where the greatest embodied carbon reductions can

be achieved. Figure 8.1 shows the results of this type

of assessment for an example of a typical mixed used

development commercial + residential. It is evident

that the top five building parts (Piling, Foundation,

Frame, Upper Floor and Envelope) provide the greatest

embodied carbon reduction opportunities, and thus

should be the focus of embodied carbon reductions.

8.0 Reducing embodied carbon – by building element

Nevertheless, the remaining bottom items (Ceiling

Finishes, Internal walls, Floor Finishes and External

Works) should also be considered for establishing the

project Embodied Carbon Reduction Strategy.

Rules of thumb for reducing embodied carbon per

building element

Page 27 identifies the big wins by building element.

For further detailed information refer to Appendix 6 -

Rules of Thumb.

SIGNPOST Appendix 6 - Rules of Thumb

48%4%

16%

15% 17%

Substructure

Superstructure

InternalFinishes

Facade

MEP

Office

Medium

scale resi-

dential

School

46%

Superstructure

4%

21%13%

16%

Substructure

MEP

InternalFinishes

Facade

31%13%

17%

22% 17%

SuperstructureInternalFinishes

Facade

MEPSubstructure

Upper Floors

Foundation

Envelope

Frame

Piling

Internal walls

Ceiling Finishes

Floor finishes

External works

0 5 10 15 20 25

Percentage of Embodied Carbon (%)

Embodied Carbon Baseline Emissions

Embodied carbon emissions after reduction measures

26

11

generated and used, without creating barriers to trade (NBS, 2012). This work has resulted in the development of a suite of standards including BS EN 15804.

BS EN 15804 (BSI , 2012) is a standard for developing a Type I I I environmental declaration of construction products that is intended to assess the sustainabil i ty of construction works. I t provides a structure to ensure that all EPDs of construction products, construction services and construction processes are derived, verified and presented in a harmonised way. Manufacturers only need to undertake one li fe cycle study to obtain a TC 350 complaint Environmental Product Declaration for their product wherever i t is used in Europe.

8.4 Embodied energy/carbon

8.4.1 Definition of embodied carbon/energy

Carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) includes other

greenhouse gas emissions as well as carbon dioxide (e.g. methane and nitrous oxide). Carbon dioxide equivalents of different gases are calculated according to how they contribute to global warming if they are released into the atmosphere.

In the Inventory of Carbon and Energy (a commonly used database for embodied energy and carbon factors for generic materials in the UK ) (Hammond et al., 2011) i t states

‘Embodied energy (carbon) is the total primary energy consumed

(carbon released) from direct and indirect processes associated

with a product or service and within the boundaries of cradle-to-

gate. This includes all activi ties from material extraction

(quarrying/mining), manufacturing, transportation and right

through to fabrication processes unti l the product is ready to

leave the fin

a

l fact or y gat e’ .

The inventory does not include additional processes that may be applied to materials after they leave their factory gate. For example, steel wil l require further fabrication, such as bending, cutting and welding, to form the casing of an air handling unit. I t is clearly important to understand for a given material what the ‘factory gate’ represents as there may be numerous factories along the supply chain.

The fina l value for cradle-to-gate for a product (A1 to A3 in Figure 8) should include all the manufacturing processes unti l the product is ready to be purchased and delivered to site. This should be based on actual data from suppliers (e.g. include the energy they use in their own factory) whenever possible instead of using average values for materials.

A comprehensive assessment of embodied carbon would also need to consider the whole li fe implications including the construction stage (A4 to A5), maintenance and replacement of components during operation (i tems B1 to B5) and disposal at end of l i fe (Category C and D).

Section 8.4.3 provides more detai l on how to calculate embodied carbon.

Assessment and tools

0 200 400

Low Typical

kgCO2/m2 of GIA

Substructure Superstructure Cladding Fit-out (shell and core)

M&E Delivery and construction Category A All (not itemised)

High

600 800 1000 1200

1650

Ropemaker place

One Kingdom Street (target zero)

One Kingdom Street (Deloit te)

3 storey – concrete framed (Bennett)

3 storey – steel framed (Bennett)

7 storey – concrete framed (Bennett)

7 storey – steel framed (Bennett)

4 storey – steel (Eaton and Amato)

4 storey – RC (Eaton and Amato)

4 storey – precast (Eaton and Amato)

8 storey – steel (Eaton and Amato)

8 storey – RC (Eaton and Amato)

8 storey – steel (Eaton and Amato)

BCO Report – Central London – air con

BCO Report – regional city – air con

BCO Report – regional city – no air con

Davis Langdon – average of 30no.

Davis Langdon – maximum

Davis Langdon – minimum

WRAP medium rise office

Barangaroo Offices, Sydney

Stanhope – Building A

Stanhope – Building B

Stanhope – Building C

Okehampton Business Centre

Pool Innovation Centre

Brunel Business Park

Leadenhall Building, London

Figure 10 Summary of embodied

carbon in construction of new office

buildings from various studies

(source What colour is your building,

(Clark, 2013))

TM56 text final (KB).indd 11 20/08/2014 12:45

Th

is p

ublic

atio

n is

su

pplie

d b

y C

IBS

E fo

r the

sole

use o

f the p

ers

on

makin

g th

e d

ow

nlo

ad

. The

con

tent re

main

s th

e c

op

yrig

ht p

rop

erty

of C

IBS

E

40-75 in Swiss study

mentioned by Jane

Page 4: Embodied Carbon and Building Services · 2020. 7. 28. · MEP vs Total initial embodied carbon LETI, from Cradle to Gate CIBSE TM56 Fig u re 8.1 - Big tic ke t ite m s stud y fo r

Embodied & whole-life carbon

Source: LETI Embodied Carbon Primer, 2020

MEP often has shorter cycle

➢ Over building life cycle,

total MEP embodied

carbon is not negligible

Comparisons are difficult

Many assumptions for both operational and embodied elements

➢ Operational: “performance gap”, future use

➢ Embodied: data, supply chains, future use…

Page 5: Embodied Carbon and Building Services · 2020. 7. 28. · MEP vs Total initial embodied carbon LETI, from Cradle to Gate CIBSE TM56 Fig u re 8.1 - Big tic ke t ite m s stud y fo r

There is a lot we can already do

to reduce MEP embodied carbon

(even if we can’t quite quantify it well)

Page 6: Embodied Carbon and Building Services · 2020. 7. 28. · MEP vs Total initial embodied carbon LETI, from Cradle to Gate CIBSE TM56 Fig u re 8.1 - Big tic ke t ite m s stud y fo r

CIBSE guidance on embodied carbon

CIBSE TM56 Resource Efficiency, 2014

Contribution to LETI Embodied Carbon Primer, 2020

CIBSE Guide L Sustainability, 2020

Resource efficiencyof building services

Reso

urce

effi

cien

cy o

f bu

ildin

g se

rvice

s TM

56

The Chartered Institut ion of Building Services Engineers

222 Balham High Road, London SW12 9BS

+ 44 (0)20 8675 5211

www.cibse.org

TM56: 2014

9 7 8 1 9 0 6 8 4 6 4 6 6

ISBN 978-1-906846-46-6

cover v3.indd 1 20/08/2014 14:07

Th

is p

ub

licatio

n is

su

pp

lied

by C

IBS

E fo

r the s

ole

use

of th

e p

ers

on

ma

kin

g th

e d

ow

nlo

ad

. Th

e c

onte

nt re

ma

ins th

e c

opyrig

ht p

rop

erty

of C

IBS

E

The Chartered Institut ion of Building Services Engineers

222 Balham High Road, London SW12 9BS

+ 44 (0)20 8675 5211

www.cibse.org

Su

stain

ab

ility

C

IBSE G

uid

e L

20

20

Sustainability

CIBSE Guide L: 2020

Page 7: Embodied Carbon and Building Services · 2020. 7. 28. · MEP vs Total initial embodied carbon LETI, from Cradle to Gate CIBSE TM56 Fig u re 8.1 - Big tic ke t ite m s stud y fo r

CIBSE guidance on embodied carbon

Why resource efficiency

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) tools

Embedding resource efficiency in projects & contracts

Principles for circular economy, and in building services:

1. ‘Designing-out’

2. Resource-efficient systems design

3. Safeguards against premature or planned obsolescence

4. Use of Building Information Modelling (BIM)

5. 3D printing (additive manufacturing)

6. Design for off-site construction

7. Recycled content

8. The standardisation of products and systems

9. Design for deconstruction/disassembly

10. Label products with a list of materials and components

11. Leasing equipment or services

12. Transport and packaging

13. End-of-life recovery, reuse and recycling

Resource efficiencyof building services

Reso

urce

effi

cien

cy o

f bu

ildin

g se

rvice

s TM

56

The Chartered Institut ion of Building Services Engineers

222 Balham High Road, London SW12 9BS

+ 44 (0)20 8675 5211

www.cibse.org

TM56: 2014

9 7 8 1 9 0 6 8 4 6 4 6 6

ISBN 978-1-906846-46-6

cover v3.indd 1 20/08/2014 14:07

Th

is p

ub

licatio

n is

su

pp

lied

by C

IBS

E fo

r the s

ole

use

of th

e p

ers

on

ma

kin

g th

e d

ow

nlo

ad

. Th

e c

onte

nt re

ma

ins th

e c

opyrig

ht p

rop

erty

of C

IBS

E

Page 8: Embodied Carbon and Building Services · 2020. 7. 28. · MEP vs Total initial embodied carbon LETI, from Cradle to Gate CIBSE TM56 Fig u re 8.1 - Big tic ke t ite m s stud y fo r

CIBSE guidance on embodied carbon

Resource efficiencyof building services

Reso

urce

effi

cien

cy o

f bu

ildin

g se

rvice

s TM

56

The Chartered Institut ion of Building Services Engineers

222 Balham High Road, London SW12 9BS

+ 44 (0)20 8675 5211

www.cibse.org

TM56: 2014

9 7 8 1 9 0 6 8 4 6 4 6 6

ISBN 978-1-906846-46-6

cover v3.indd 1 20/08/2014 14:07

Th

is p

ub

licatio

n is

su

pp

lied

by C

IBS

E fo

r the s

ole

use

of th

e p

ers

on

ma

kin

g th

e d

ow

nlo

ad

. Th

e c

onte

nt re

ma

ins th

e c

opyrig

ht p

rop

erty

of C

IBS

E

Opportunities in HVAC, lighting and vertical transportation:

➢ ‘Designing-out’

➢ Systems design

➢ Product selection

➢ Reuse

➢ End of life

Opportunities in HVAC, lighting and vertical transportation:

➢ ‘Designing-out’

➢ Systems design

➢ Product selection

➢ Reuse

➢ End of life

Page 9: Embodied Carbon and Building Services · 2020. 7. 28. · MEP vs Total initial embodied carbon LETI, from Cradle to Gate CIBSE TM56 Fig u re 8.1 - Big tic ke t ite m s stud y fo r

“Designing out”

Could it be less ?

Or at least much smaller ?

Page 10: Embodied Carbon and Building Services · 2020. 7. 28. · MEP vs Total initial embodied carbon LETI, from Cradle to Gate CIBSE TM56 Fig u re 8.1 - Big tic ke t ite m s stud y fo r

Opportunities in heating & cooling

Design

➢ Challenge the brief, design criteria & internal conditions

➢ Size with appropriate margins & avoid oversizing

“Heating plant is often oversized due to excessive design margins.

The use of multiple boilers has led to considerable oversizing – up to 500% compared with even the maximum design load” (AM14, 2010)

➢ For heating, use CIBSE KS8 (2006) and send feedback to CIBSE➢ Clear statement of assumptions and implications on design limits➢ Revisit assumptions, design load and sizing as detail progresses➢ Monitor in use, if possible, and send feedback to CIBSE

Resource efficiencyof building services

Reso

urc

e e

fficie

ncy o

f bu

ildin

g se

rvic

es

TM

56

The Chartered Institut ion of Building Services Engineers

222 Balham High Road, London SW12 9BS

+ 44 (0)20 8675 5211

www.cibse.org

TM56: 2014

9 7 8 1 9 0 6 8 4 6 4 6 6

ISBN 978-1-906846-46-6

cover v3.indd 1 20/08/2014 14:07

Th

is p

ub

licatio

n is

su

pp

lied

by C

IBS

E fo

r the s

ole

use

of th

e p

ers

on

ma

kin

g th

e d

ow

nlo

ad

. Th

e c

onte

nt re

ma

ins th

e c

opyrig

ht p

rop

erty

of C

IBS

E

Future data & functions: ➢ Peaks? ➢ Profiles ?

Resource efficiency

of building services

Reso

urce

efficie

ncy o

f build

ing se

rvices

TM56

The Chartered Institut ion of Building Services Engineers

222 Balham High Road, London SW12 9BS

+ 44 (0)20 8675 5211

www.cibse.org

TM56: 2014

97 8 1 9 0 6 8 4 6 4 6 6

ISBN 978-1-906846-46-6

cover v3.indd 1

20/08/2014 14:07

This p

ublica

tion is su

pplie

d b

y CIB

SE

for th

e so

le u

se o

f the p

erso

n m

akin

g th

e d

ow

nlo

ad. T

he co

nte

nt re

main

s the co

pyrig

ht p

roperty o

f CIB

SE

Page 11: Embodied Carbon and Building Services · 2020. 7. 28. · MEP vs Total initial embodied carbon LETI, from Cradle to Gate CIBSE TM56 Fig u re 8.1 - Big tic ke t ite m s stud y fo r

Opportunities in heating & cooling

Design: reducing demand

➢ Influence early stage decisions: site layout, building form,

orientation and fabric

➢ Minimise thermal bridging, ventilation and air infiltration

heat losses

➢ Reduce heat loss by insulating pipework, valves etc

Resource efficiency

of building services

Reso

urce

efficie

ncy o

f build

ing se

rvices

TM56

The Chartered Institut ion of Building Services Engineers

222 Balham High Road, London SW12 9BS

+ 44 (0)20 8675 5211

www.cibse.org

TM56: 2014

97 8 1 9 0 6 8 4 6 4 6 6

ISBN 978-1-906846-46-6

cover v3.indd 1

20/08/2014 14:07

This p

ublica

tion is su

pplie

d b

y CIB

SE

for th

e so

le u

se o

f the p

erso

n m

akin

g th

e d

ow

nlo

ad. T

he co

nte

nt re

main

s the co

pyrig

ht p

roperty o

f CIB

SE

Resource efficiencyof building services

Reso

urc

e e

fficie

ncy o

f bu

ildin

g se

rvic

es

TM

56

The Chartered Institut ion of Building Services Engineers

222 Balham High Road, London SW12 9BS

+ 44 (0)20 8675 5211

www.cibse.org

TM56: 2014

9 7 8 1 9 0 6 8 4 6 4 6 6

ISBN 978-1-906846-46-6

cover v3.indd 1 20/08/2014 14:07

Th

is p

ub

licatio

n is

su

pp

lied

by C

IBS

E fo

r the s

ole

use

of th

e p

ers

on

ma

kin

g th

e d

ow

nlo

ad

. Th

e c

onte

nt re

ma

ins th

e c

opyrig

ht p

rop

erty

of C

IBS

E

Examples

Passivhaus criteria:

Max space heating demand of 15kWh/m2/yr or 10W/m2

Guide L case study: Office in Switzerland, 2009:

hardly any heating or cooling plant

Page 12: Embodied Carbon and Building Services · 2020. 7. 28. · MEP vs Total initial embodied carbon LETI, from Cradle to Gate CIBSE TM56 Fig u re 8.1 - Big tic ke t ite m s stud y fo r

Layout & strategic decisions

Where to put which uses?

Page 13: Embodied Carbon and Building Services · 2020. 7. 28. · MEP vs Total initial embodied carbon LETI, from Cradle to Gate CIBSE TM56 Fig u re 8.1 - Big tic ke t ite m s stud y fo r

Non-domestic buildings:

➢ Need balance incl. occupancy density & natural ventilation potential

Less articulated (form & façade): smaller heat loss area

Insulation to achieve Passivhaus (BRE Passivhaus primer)

heatingcooling and lighting

Building form

Page 14: Embodied Carbon and Building Services · 2020. 7. 28. · MEP vs Total initial embodied carbon LETI, from Cradle to Gate CIBSE TM56 Fig u re 8.1 - Big tic ke t ite m s stud y fo r

Opportunities in heating & cooling

System Design

➢ Consider the whole system to reduce demand overall

➢ E.g. influence of equipment on heating and cooling

demand

➢ E.g. no suspended ceilings: impact on materials,

thermal mass, and coordination and quality of works

➢ Review overall impacts of system & product selection:

➢ Function

➢ Comfort

➢ Whole-life carbon

➢ Other environmental impacts >> e.g. Environmental

Product Declarations

➢ Reduce the length of distribution systems, incl. location

of plant room

➢ Reduce heat emitters as far as possible

➢ Select systems with low refrigerant volumes

➢ …..

Resource efficiency

of building services

Reso

urce

efficie

ncy o

f build

ing se

rvices

TM56

The Chartered Institut ion of Building Services Engineers

222 Balham High Road, London SW12 9BS

+ 44 (0)20 8675 5211

www.cibse.org

TM56: 2014

97 8 1 9 0 6 8 4 6 4 6 6

ISBN 978-1-906846-46-6

cover v3.indd 1

20/08/2014 14:07

This p

ublica

tion is su

pplie

d b

y CIB

SE

for th

e so

le u

se o

f the p

erso

n m

akin

g th

e d

ow

nlo

ad. T

he co

nte

nt re

main

s the co

pyrig

ht p

roperty o

f CIB

SE

Resource efficiencyof building services

Reso

urc

e e

fficie

ncy o

f bu

ildin

g se

rvic

es

TM

56

The Chartered Institut ion of Building Services Engineers

222 Balham High Road, London SW12 9BS

+ 44 (0)20 8675 5211

www.cibse.org

TM56: 2014

9 7 8 1 9 0 6 8 4 6 4 6 6

ISBN 978-1-906846-46-6

cover v3.indd 1 20/08/2014 14:07

Th

is p

ub

licatio

n is

su

pp

lied

by C

IBS

E fo

r the s

ole

use

of th

e p

ers

on

ma

kin

g th

e d

ow

nlo

ad

. Th

e c

onte

nt re

ma

ins th

e c

opyrig

ht p

rop

erty

of C

IBS

E

Page 15: Embodied Carbon and Building Services · 2020. 7. 28. · MEP vs Total initial embodied carbon LETI, from Cradle to Gate CIBSE TM56 Fig u re 8.1 - Big tic ke t ite m s stud y fo r

“End of life” and circular economy

Guidance and case studiesResource efficiencyof building services

Reso

urce

effi

cien

cy o

f bu

ildin

g se

rvice

s TM

56

The Chartered Institut ion of Building Services Engineers

222 Balham High Road, London SW12 9BS

+ 44 (0)20 8675 5211

www.cibse.org

TM56: 2014

9 7 8 1 9 0 6 8 4 6 4 6 6

ISBN 978-1-906846-46-6

cover v3.indd 1 20/08/2014 14:07

Th

is p

ub

licatio

n is

su

pp

lied

by C

IBS

E fo

r the s

ole

use

of th

e p

ers

on

ma

kin

g th

e d

ow

nlo

ad

. Th

e c

onte

nt re

ma

ins th

e c

opyrig

ht p

rop

erty

of C

IBS

E

The Chartered Institut ion of Building Services Engineers

222 Balham High Road, London SW12 9BS

+ 44 (0)20 8675 5211

www.cibse.org

Su

stain

ab

ility

C

IBSE G

uid

e L

20

20

Sustainability

CIBSE Guide L: 2020

2020 CIBSE Research insight:

Circular economy principles for building

services

https://www.cibse.org/knowledge/knowled

ge-by-publication-type/research-insight

Research InsightCircular economy principles for building services

Circular economy principles for building services 15

3 Conclusions

3.1 The five scenarios

The five scenarios outlined in this document provide a framework that can be applied to any

project to incorporate circular economy principles. Embedding these principles in project

briefs is a step that can be taken to address both the environmental issues associated

with the production of building services equipment and the challenges faced by building

operators. There are also potential reductions in the whole life cost of ownership.

universal

passive

joint venturerecover

pre-loved project-specific

circular economy design space

Figure 5 The five scenarios provide a framework which can be applied to any project design

3.2 Early engagement is important

A common theme throughout the research was the importance of early stakeholder

engagement. Scenarios such as ‘universal’, ‘joint venture’ and ‘passive’ require buy-in from

the client and early engagement with the supply chain, whether it be deciding the future

use of the space, agreeing to novel contractual arrangements, or defining different design

conditions. Outlining the implications of circular design at an early stage of the project

allows more informed decision making. A TOTEX approach to planning and funding projects

can allow the full value of circular economy to be realised. If this is not possible, however ,

different briefs can be used to deliver improved value within specific financial contraints, e.g.

divided CAPEX and OPEX budgets.

3.3 Collaboration

Close collaboration between members of the project team is another recurring theme. Joint

ventures incentivise the management of systems so that they retain their highest value.

Digital technology is a major enabler for this collaboration, providing the opportunity for

a data-driven approach to system operation, preventative maintenance, appropriate plant

replacement and improved stakeholder engagement.

Ensuring that there are open channels of communication within projects enables this

collaboration and provides stakeholders with visibility of the relevant data. The result is a

reduction in the performance gap between design and operation that is present in many

buildings.

Th

is pu

blica

tion

is sup

plie

d b

y C

IBSE fo

r the so

le u

se o

f the p

erso

n m

akin

g th

e d

ow

nlo

ad

; it sho

uld

no

t be co

pie

d o

r forw

ard

ed

to a

ny o

ther p

erso

n o

r info

rmatio

n so

urce

.

Page 16: Embodied Carbon and Building Services · 2020. 7. 28. · MEP vs Total initial embodied carbon LETI, from Cradle to Gate CIBSE TM56 Fig u re 8.1 - Big tic ke t ite m s stud y fo r

Operational & embodied carbon

Win-wins

➢ Very often the big wins

➢ Seek & prioritise them

Demand reduction

Efficient shapes

Shorter distribution routes

Low refrigerant leakage

Easy maintenance

Case-by-case balance

➢ Maybe other impacts

e.g. comfort

GWP of refrigerant

Thermal mass

Level of insulation

(in non-domestic)

Shading, filters - too important

to be gauged on carbon alone

Figure 8.1 - Big ticket items study for a typical mixed use development: commercial & residential.Study by Mirko Farnetani

Figure 8.2 - Embodied carbon break-down per element (Cradle to Gate)

Proportions of embodied carbon by building element

The diagram below shows the relative proportions of

embodied carbon by building element and illustrates

the elements where the most savings may be made.

What is important is not just the proportion of

embodied carbon per element, but the potential

total embodied carbon reductions of all the elements.

At RIBA Stage 3 a full building detailed whole life

carbon assessment should be undertaken. As part of

this a study should be undertaken that identifies the

breakdown of embodied carbon by element and

the carbon reductions that could be achieved for

each element. This helps to identify ‘big ticket items’ –

where the greatest embodied carbon reductions can

be achieved. Figure 8.1 shows the results of this type

of assessment for an example of a typical mixed used

development commercial + residential. It is evident

that the top five building parts (Piling, Foundation,

Frame, Upper Floor and Envelope) provide the greatest

embodied carbon reduction opportunities, and thus

should be the focus of embodied carbon reductions.

8.0 Reducing embodied carbon – by building element

Nevertheless, the remaining bottom items (Ceiling

Finishes, Internal walls, Floor Finishes and External

Works) should also be considered for establishing the

project Embodied Carbon Reduction Strategy.

Rules of thumb for reducing embodied carbon per

building element

Page 27 identifies the big wins by building element.

For further detailed information refer to Appendix 6 -

Rules of Thumb.

SIGNPOST Appendix 6 - Rules of Thumb

48%4%

16%

15% 17%

Substructure

Superstructure

InternalFinishes

Facade

MEP

Office

Medium

scale resi-

dential

School

46%

Superstructure

4%

21%13%

16%

Substructure

MEP

InternalFinishes

Facade

31%13%

17%

22% 17%

SuperstructureInternalFinishes

Facade

MEPSubstructure

Upper Floors

Foundation

Envelope

Frame

Piling

Internal walls

Ceiling Finishes

Floor finishes

External works

0 5 10 15 20 25

Percentage of Embodied Carbon (%)

Embodied Carbon Baseline Emissions

Embodied carbon emissions after reduction measures

26

Initial embodied carbon

(LETI, from Cradle to Gate)

Page 17: Embodied Carbon and Building Services · 2020. 7. 28. · MEP vs Total initial embodied carbon LETI, from Cradle to Gate CIBSE TM56 Fig u re 8.1 - Big tic ke t ite m s stud y fo r

Poll

Help inform CIBSE Activities

Q1 - How could CIBSE most help you reduce MEP embodied carbon?

a) Guidance on reducing peak loads

b) Guidance on reducing plant: design margins, back-up…

c) Guidance on products: selection, assessment methodology

d) Guidance on systems: selection, assessment methodology

e) A database of EPDs

f) Case studies

g) More training on TM56

h) Something else – please detail in the chat box

i) I’m not sure

Page 18: Embodied Carbon and Building Services · 2020. 7. 28. · MEP vs Total initial embodied carbon LETI, from Cradle to Gate CIBSE TM56 Fig u re 8.1 - Big tic ke t ite m s stud y fo r

Poll

Help inform CIBSE Activities

Q2 – What is the lowest priority for CIBSE to spend efforts on?

a) Guidance on reducing peak loads

b) Guidance on reducing plant: design margins, back-up…

c) Guidance on products: selection, assessment methodology

d) Guidance on systems: selection, assessment methodology

e) A database of EPDs

f) Case studies

g) More training on TM56

h) Something else – please detail in the chat box

i) I’m not sure

Page 19: Embodied Carbon and Building Services · 2020. 7. 28. · MEP vs Total initial embodied carbon LETI, from Cradle to Gate CIBSE TM56 Fig u re 8.1 - Big tic ke t ite m s stud y fo r

Take-aways

We need more data & guidance (CIBSE are working on it),

But there is already a lot we can do

Simpler buildings, less complex systems

Optimised shapes

Lower demand to reduce or avoid HVAC

➢ Consider whole-life carbon

➢ Look for co-benefits: operational carbon, comfort

➢ Let clients know – capex benefits, design limits

➢ Ask for Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs)

➢ Look out for new CIBSE guidance

➢ Contribute to benchmarks – annual & peak demand

=Operational & Embodied

carbon benefits

Resource efficiencyof building services

Reso

urce

effi

cien

cy o

f bu

ildin

g se

rvice

s TM

56

The Chartered Institut ion of Building Services Engineers

222 Balham High Road, London SW12 9BS

+ 44 (0)20 8675 5211

www.cibse.org

TM56: 2014

9 7 8 1 9 0 6 8 4 6 4 6 6

ISBN 978-1-906846-46-6

cover v3.indd 1 20/08/2014 14:07

Th

is p

ub

licatio

n is

su

pp

lied

by C

IBS

E fo

r the s

ole

use

of th

e p

ers

on

ma

kin

g th

e d

ow

nlo

ad

. Th

e c

onte

nt re

ma

ins th

e c

opyrig

ht p

rop

erty

of C

IBS

E

Page 20: Embodied Carbon and Building Services · 2020. 7. 28. · MEP vs Total initial embodied carbon LETI, from Cradle to Gate CIBSE TM56 Fig u re 8.1 - Big tic ke t ite m s stud y fo r

Follow @CIBSE

Thank you

[email protected]