Upload
daniel-cross
View
212
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Emotion
Involve a mixture of: Physiological arousal
Heart pounding, etc. Expressive behavior
Teeth clenched Conscious experience
Interpreting others behaviors Interpreting your own feelings
The Physiology of Emotion When you are emotionally aroused, your body is physically
aroused… Autonomic Nervous System
Remember this is the “automatic pilot” part of the nervous system – controls the glands and muscles of the internal organs (like your heart)
It’s a dual system that is working together to help maintain homeostasis
This dual system is constantly active trying to keep a steady internal state
Sympathetic Nervous System Arouses the body – mobilizes energy in stressful situations Increases such things as HR, breathing, production of
sweat, and the flow of epinephrine (adrenaline) Parasympathetic Nervous System
Calms you down
The Physiology of Emotion
Opponent Process Theory (Solomon & Corbit, 1974) Two assumptions:
Any reaction to a stimulus is followed by the opposite reaction
For example: sky-diving Initial reaction: arousal (terror) Opposite reaction: calm (relief)
Repeated exposure to the same stimulus causes the initial reaction to weaken and the opposite reaction is quicker and stronger
For example: the fifth or sixth ride on the same roller coaster on the same day doesn’t produce the effect it did on the first ride
Early Theories of Emotion
James-Lange Theory (James, 1890)
According to this theory, people experience emotion based on observations of their own physical behavior and peripheral responses
We basically check our body responses to determine our emotions
We feel sorry because we cried…
We feel afraid because we are trembling…
The feeling follows the response and is caused by the response
The smile made me happy…
James-Lange Theory
Emotions are caused by a change in our physiological state
This change in the physiological state is caused by some stimulus in our environment
Criticism of James-Lange Theory
The problem is that this theory predicts that there should be a fairly fixed relationship between physiological state and emotion
But other researchers feel there is not this one-to-one relationship
A single physiological state change may actually be correlated with a number of different emotions
Early Theories of Emotion
Cannon-Bard Theory This theory developed in response to this observation
that there is not a one-to-one relationship between our physiological state and our emotional state
This theory of emotion states that an emotion is produced when some stimulus triggers the thalamus to send information simultaneously to the brain (specifically, the cerebral cortex) and the autonomic system (including the skeletal muscles)
Thus, the stimulus is perceived at both a physiological and the subjective level
Cannon-Bard Theory
These researchers felt that body arousal and the experience of emotion occur simultaneously Your heart starts pounding at the same
time you experience the fear But one does not cause the other
Other Theories of Emotion
Schachter-Singer’s Two-Factor Theory The intensity level of our body responses determines
the intensity of the emotion but doesn’t tell us which emotion we are experiencing
We must use cognitive processes to determine and label which emotion it is
More awareness here than in James Lange theory This interpretation involves reflecting back on the
situation the physiological response is coming from Thus, giving a cognitive appraisal so we can
determine the emotion
Transferred Excitation
Reisenzein (1983) Also, referred to as a “spillover effect”…
When arousal from one experience carries over to an independent situation
Non-emotional sources may intensify a new emotional experience
For example, you just finish your weight-lifting work-out and you are provoked by someone 10 minutes later – you become more angry than you would had you not been working out
So, maybe overt signs of physical arousal had subsided but the sympathetic nervous system is still active
Transferred Excitation
Also possible is that one emotion can also transfer to another… Dutton & Aron (1974)
Found that a the emotion of fear enhanced men’s sexual feelings
Dutton & Aron (1974)
Participants: Men Ages 18-35
Site: Capilano Canyon Method
Procedures: Men approached by experimenter Asked to invent short story from TAT picture Encouraged to call experimenter for results
Social Referencing
The process of letting another person’s emotional state guide our own behavior Especially for those that are unsure Might check others facial expressions before
producing a behavior
Schachter and Singer (1962)
Procedures: Gave injections to participants Deception used in several ways
Schachter and Singer (1962)
DV: social referencing
IV1: injection of epinephrine vs. saline solution
IV2: information IV3: euphoric or angry “confederates”
The two dimensions of emotion…
Watson, Russell, and Tellegen (1989) Described emotions as variations of two
dimensions: Unpleasant vs. pleasant feelings Low vs. high arousal
The two dimensions of emotion…
Need to take that big psychology test, participate in some sporting event, or give a speech??? Some label this arousal as energizing…
They feel “up” for the game It gives them an edge Just a few ‘butterflies” – I’ll be okay This is a positive valence
But some become terrified… I’m going to have a panic attack when I give that presentation Some even get physically ill Here, arousal is both too high and valence is unpleasant
Detecting Emotion: Lie Detection
Polygraph (“the lie detector”) Once employed in both law enforcement work and national security
matters By mid-1980’s it was used approximately 2 million times a year in
U.S. Mostly in attempts to screen new employees for honesty or to
uncover employee theft Does not literally detect lies…
It measures several of the physiological responses that accompany emotions including HR, BP, and electrical conduction of the skin (perspiration)
Underlying assumption is that lying is stressful and that a person who is lying will become physiologically aroused
The Typical Procedure
First of all, the examiner tries to convince the individual that the instrument is highly accurate A lie in itself ???
Once he/she feels the individual is relaxed (another problem?) several control questions are asked These are designed to make anyone a little nervous
In the last 10 years have you ever taken something that didn’t belong to you
Many tell a “white lie” here and often the polygraph picks up on this with slight physiological changes
Then the critical questions are asked: Did you steal that laptop from your professor’s office last week???
The Typical Procedure
Analysis: If the subject’s physiological reactions to the
critical questions are stronger than the control questions, then the examiner can infer that they are lying on the critical questions
The assumption is that only a thief would become agitated when denying the theft
How well does the lie detector work?
Do liars exhibit anxiety when lying? Can a hardened psychopathic criminal “beat” the machine? Or worse yet, can an innocent person feeling a heightened
degree of tension caused by the accusations fail the test? Despite these problems some the American Polygraph
Association points to near 100% accuracy (if not counting the inconclusives) Daytime talk shows say its like 99.99%
Most other studies say its about 66% accurate So not much better than flipping a coin (50% accurate)
False Positives
Most of the errors made by the polygraph are “false alarms” Falsely predicting that innocent people are lying
Many psychological studies have witnessed the polygraph call more than half of the innocent as liars Maybe we should flip a coin?
The biggest advantage of the polygraph appears as a tool in criminal investigations as police are sometimes able to use the polygraph to induce confessions by criminals who are not knowledgeable enough to know the pitfalls involved in this type of testing
Experiencing Emotion: Anger
Anger Sometimes referred to as a “short madness” Can lead to acts of aggression Can be many times more hurtful than the injury that
caused it Can make a coward act brave
Averill (1983) Anger is often a response to a perceived misdeed of
a friend or loved one when it is considered willful, unjustified, and avoidable
Lets take a look at what makes us angry?
Anderson and Anderson (1984, 1998) Found that uncomfortably hot weather
heightened aggressive reactions
Effects of Temperature on Anger and AggressionEffects of Temperature on Anger and Aggression
Source: Anderson, C. A. & Anderson, K. P. (1998)
Anderson (1987) (Anderson, Bushman, & Groom (1996)
Time period studies show that violent crimes are more likely to occur during warm-weather months than on cold weather months, and also that violent crimes tend to be more common in hot years than in cooler years and that the usual summer increase in violent crime is magnified during hotter years
Unpleasant Situations:Sweltering heat
Increases in temperature are associated with: More aggressive
horn-honking Increases in
assaults Increases in
murders Increases in
urban riots Major league
pitchers throwing more balls at batters
See next slide –>
below 70below 70 70-7970-79 80-8980-89 90 +90 +
Pla
yers
Hit
Per
Gam
eP
laye
rs H
it P
er G
ame
0.30.3
0.40.4
0.50.5
0.60.6
Reifman, Larrick, & Fein, 1991
Unpleasant Situations
Swedish teens asked to categorize anger-producing situations commonly listed: Thwarted plans
Example: Your parents refuse to send money for your
planned spring break ski vacation) Environmental frustrations
Example: A traffic jam when you’re late for class
GETTING IT OFF YOUR CHEST
Many therapists believe that unconsciously repressed emotions cause a variety of major problems: neurotic and psychotic behaviors, interpersonal conflicts psychosomatic disorders, etc.
Some people become overwhelmed by their emotions; others hold in their feelings and may not even know they are there
Catharsis... Venting... Discharging...
Expressing Emotions...
Freud felt that holding in one’s feelings causes mental and physical stress
And, stress can be very destructive Often suppressing and hiding "awful"
thoughts actually results in uncontrollable obsessions about the very thing we are trying to hide
It might make you feel better…
So, maybe its better to let all our vile feelings spew out to the guy down the block who is happily watering his lawn on a summer day?
Catharsis: Good or Crazy?
Well, maybe that’s going too far but… Venting or discharging emotions involves
vigorously expressing the emotion--fear, sadness, anger, dependency--so completely you feel "drained"
Then, according to Freud, the strength of the emotion is markedly reduced or eliminated. And you feel better. Are healthier.
So is it healthy or abnormal to punch a hole in the wall when you bomb that big psych test???
But not all researchers agree…
Expressing anger can be temporarily calming but usually it fails to cleanse one’s rage
Often expressing anger breeds more anger May provoke retaliation May become reinforcing and thus habit forming
Ebbesen, Duncan, & Konecni (1975)
Interviewed recently fired employees and encouraged them to talk about their hostility towards the company
Interestingly, this talking increased their hostility Catharsis actually led to greater amounts of anger
Like a movie played over and over…
The researchers concluded: If we talk about it then we tend to think about it a
lot It becomes an obsession, like a movie played
over and over The more we think about it, the angrier we get